Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-148
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-148
09 Nov 2023
 | 09 Nov 2023
Status: a revised version of this preprint is currently under review for the journal TC.

Multiscale modeling of heat and mass transfer in dry snow: influence of the condensation coefficient and comparison with experiments

Lisa Bouvet, Neige Calonne, Frédéric Flin, and Christian Geindreau

Abstract. Temperature gradient metamorphism in dry snow is driven by heat and water vapor transfer through snow, which includes conduction/diffusion processes in both air and ice phases as well as sublimation and deposition at the ice-air interface. The latter processes are driven by the condensation coefficient α, a poorly constrained parameter in literature. In the present paper, we use an upscaling method to derive heat and mass transfer models at the snow layer scale according to α in the range 10−10 to 1. A transition α-value arises, of the order of 10−4 for typical snow microstructures (characteristic length ∼ 0.5 mm), such as the vapor transport is limited by sublimation-deposition below that value and by diffusion above. Accordingly, different macroscopic models with specific domains of validity with respect to α-values are derived. A comprehensive evaluation of the models is presented by comparing with three experimental datasets as well as with pore-scale simulations using a simplified microstructure. The models reproduce the two main features of the experiments: the non-linear temperature profiles, with enhanced values in the center of the snow layer, and the mass transfer, with an abrupt basal mass loss. However, both features are overall underestimated by the models when compared to the experimental data. We investigate possible causes of these discrepancies and suggest potential improvements for the modeling of heat and mass transport in dry snow.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Lisa Bouvet, Neige Calonne, Frédéric Flin, and Christian Geindreau

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on tc-2023-148', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Dec 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Lisa Bouvet, 16 May 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on tc-2023-148', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Jan 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Lisa Bouvet, 16 May 2024
Lisa Bouvet, Neige Calonne, Frédéric Flin, and Christian Geindreau
Lisa Bouvet, Neige Calonne, Frédéric Flin, and Christian Geindreau

Viewed

Total article views: 373 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
270 74 29 373 34 24 28
  • HTML: 270
  • PDF: 74
  • XML: 29
  • Total: 373
  • Supplement: 34
  • BibTeX: 24
  • EndNote: 28
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Nov 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 359 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 359 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Three different macroscopic heat and mass transfer models have been derived for a large range of condensation coefficient values by an upscaling method. A comprehensive evaluation of the models is presented based on experimental datasets and numerical examples. The models reproduce the trend of experimental temperature and density profiles, but underestimate the magnitude of the processes. Possible causes of these discrepancies and potential improvements for the models are suggested.