Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-116
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-116
28 Aug 2023
 | 28 Aug 2023
Status: a revised version of this preprint was accepted for the journal TC and is expected to appear here in due course.

Suitability of CICE Sea Ice Model for Seasonal Prediction and Positive Impact of CryoSat-2 Ice Thickness Initialization

Shan Sun and Amy Solomon

Abstract. The Los Alamos sea ice model (CICE) is being tested in standalone mode to identify biases that limit its suitability for seasonal prediction, where CICE is driven by atmospheric forcings from the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and a built-in mixed layer ocean model in CICE. The initial conditions for the sea ice and mixed layer ocean are also from CFSR in the control experiments. The simulated sea ice extent agrees well with observations during the warm season at all lead times up to 12 months, in both the Arctic and Antarctic. This suggests that CICE is able to provide useful sea ice edge information for seasonal prediction. However, the model’s Arctic sea ice thickness forecast has a positive bias that originates from the initial conditions. This bias often persists for more than a season, which limits the model’s seasonal forecast skill. To address this limitation, additional CS2_IC experiments were conducted, where the Arctic ice thickness was initialized using CryoSat-2 satellite observations while keeping all other initial fields the same as in the control experiments. This reduced the positive bias in the ice thickness in the initial conditions, leading to improvements in both the simulated ice edge and thickness at the seasonal time scale. This study highlights that the suitability of CICE for seasonal prediction depends on various factors, including initial conditions such as sea ice thickness, oceanic and atmospheric conditions in addition to sea ice coverage. By reducing the bias in the initial ice thickness, CICE has the potential to improve its seasonal forecast skill and provide more accurate predictions of sea ice extent and thickness.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Shan Sun and Amy Solomon

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on tc-2023-116', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Oct 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on tc-2023-116', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Nov 2023

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on tc-2023-116', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Oct 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on tc-2023-116', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Nov 2023
Shan Sun and Amy Solomon
Shan Sun and Amy Solomon

Viewed

Total article views: 467 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
305 129 33 467 28 26
  • HTML: 305
  • PDF: 129
  • XML: 33
  • Total: 467
  • BibTeX: 28
  • EndNote: 26
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Aug 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Aug 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 450 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 450 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
The study brings to light that the suitability of CICE for seasonal prediction is contingent on several factors, such as initial conditions like sea ice coverage and thickness, as well as atmospheric and oceanic conditions including oceanic currents and SST. It suggests that there is potential to improve seasonal forecasting by using a more reliable sea ice thickness initialization. Thus, data assimilation of sea ice thickness is highly relevant for advancing seasonal prediction skills.