the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Assimilation of satellite swaths versus daily means of sea ice concentration in a regional coupled ocean-sea ice model
Marina Durán Moro
Ann Kristin Sperrevik
Thomas Lavergne
Laurent Bertino
Yvonne Gusdal
Silje Christine Iversen
Jozef Rusin
Abstract. Operational forecasting systems routinely assimilate daily means of sea ice concentration (SIC) from microwave radiometers in order to improve the accuracy of the forecasts. However, the temporal and spatial averaging of the satellite individual swaths into daily means of SIC entails two main drawbacks: (i) the spatial resolution of the original product is blurred (specially critical on periods with strong sub-daily sea ice movement), and (ii) the sub-daily frequency of passive microwave observations in the Arctic is not used, providing less temporal resolution in the data assimilation (DA) analysis and therefore, in the forecast. Within the SIRANO (Sea Ice Retrievals and data Assimilation in NOrway) project, we investigate how challenge (i) and (ii) can be avoided by assimilating satellite individual swaths (Level-3 Uncollated) instead of daily means (Level-3) of SIC. To do so, we use a regional configuration of the Barents Sea (2.5 km grid) based on the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) and The Los Alamos Sea Ice Model (CICE) together with the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) as the DA system. The assimilation of individual swaths significantly improves the EnKF analysis of SIC compared to the assimilation of daily means; the Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) shows a 10 % improvement at the end of the assimilation period, and a 7 % improvement at the end of the 7-day forecast period. This improvement is caused by better exploitation of the information provided by the SIC swath data, in terms of both spatial and temporal variance, compared to the case when the swaths are combined to form a daily mean before assimilation.
- Preprint
(18306 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Marina Durán Moro et al.
Status: open (until 02 Nov 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on tc-2023-115', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Sep 2023
reply
Summary: In this study, a regional configuration of the Barents Sea modeling system composed of ROMS and CICE 5.1.2 is used to study the impact of the assimilation of swath AMSR2 sea ice concentration data versus daily means of SIRANO sea ice concentration data. Particular focus was given to sub-regions with the 2.5km domain for the Barents and Greenland Sea. Two sets of atmospheric forcing are used to introduce ensemble spread: 1) Integrated Forecast System developed at ECMWF which provided members 1-5, and MET-AA which provided member 6. The EnKF is used as the data assimilation system in this study. Three experiments are performed: 1) Control run without DA, 2) synchronous assimilation using SIRANO data, and 3) asynchronous assimilation using AMSR2 swath data. This study found that the assimilation of the swath AMSR2 sea ice concentration led to a 10% improvement in the MAD at the end of the assimilation period and 7% improvement at the end of the 7-day forecast period.
This is a very thorough and well written paper. I only have minor comments listed below. I recommend publication.
General Comments:
Line 304: Rephrase “As CICE does not…” to something like “While CICE 5.1.2 used in this study does not differentiate between stationary ice attached to land, CICE6 includes a landfast ice parameterization (https://zenodo.org/record/7419531).
Fig. 5: Why was this particular month chosen (April 2022), with the Easter Holiday occurring mid-April? You lose data for 5 days (April 14-18) versus the typical 2 days on weekends? Since you should have the SIRANO data, I suggest you add that information for the Barents, Greenland, and Entire region to the plot.
Figure 9 caption: “Mean Absolute Difference” is defined as Mean Absolute Deviation on line 166. Please make correction.
Lines 443-450: Do you have any graphics or tables to support your (29% lower), (14.3% improvement) statements?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-115-RC1
Marina Durán Moro et al.
Data sets
Ice-charts MET Norway https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00128
Model code and software
metno/metroms: Version 0.4.1 Jens Debernard, Nils Melsom Kristensen, Sebastian Maartensson, Keguang Wang, Kate Hedstrom, Jostein Brændshøi, and Nicholas Szapiro https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5067164
EnKF-C v.2.9.9 Pavel Sakov https://github.com/sakov/EnKF-C.git
Marina Durán Moro et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
136 | 49 | 8 | 193 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 136
- PDF: 49
- XML: 8
- Total: 193
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1