the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Can Saharan dust deposition impact snowpack stability in the French Alps?
Oscar Dick
Léo Viallon-Galinier
François Tuzet
Pascal Hagenmuller
Mathieu Fructus
Benjamin Reuter
Matthieu Lafaysse
Marie Dumont
Abstract. Saharan dust deposits can turn snow covered mountains into a spectacular orange landscape. When avalanches release, a formerly buried dust layer can become apparent, possibly marking the base of the crown. This appearance may suggest a relation between avalanche release and the prior deposited dust, which found mention among recreationists and avalanche professionals alike. While dust deposition affects the absorption of solar energy altering snowpack temperatures and melt rates, to date, there is no clear scientific evidence that dust deposition can significantly modify avalanche activity. Here we investigate, using an ensemble snow cover model, the impact of dust deposition on snow properties and mechanical stability by comparing simulations with and without dust deposition for synthetic and observed dust deposition events. The study focuses on two typical avalanche situations: artificial triggering on persistent weak layers and natural release of wet-snow avalanches. We study several situations with and without dust deposition and demonstrate how sensitive the impact of dust deposition is to the deposited dust mass, the slope aspect, the elevation and the meteorological conditions following the dust deposition. The additional energy absorbed by the dust layer speeds up warming and may advance surface wetting to ease the formation of a melt-freeze crust. If the crust is buried, the phenomenon of a strong temperature gradient close to the crust may promote the formation of persistent weak layers inside the snowpack after weak layer burial. On the other hand, the melt-freeze crust may also lead to an increase of snowpack stability by redistributing the stress applied to buried weak layers. Regarding wet-snow instabilities, we show that dust deposition can advance the onset of wet-snow avalanche activity by up to one month in spring, as hypothesized in previous studies. Thus, the impact of Saharan dust deposition on snow mechanical stability can be either neutral, positive or negative, depending on the local snow and meteorological conditions. Even though not all physical processes are implemented, state-of the art snow cover models are able to mimic the speed-up of crust formation and snow instability models can point out relevant situations for avalanche forecasting.
Oscar Dick et al.
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on tc-2022-219', Kevin Hammonds, 26 Jan 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-219/tc-2022-219-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Léo Viallon-Galinier, 28 Feb 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-219/tc-2022-219-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Léo Viallon-Galinier, 28 Feb 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on tc-2022-219', Ingrid Reiweger, 27 Jan 2023
Review TC-2022-219
The paper “Can Saharan dust deposition impact snowpack stability in the French Alps?“ deals with the question on how Saharan dust deposition influence snowpack stability with respect to avalanche release. To investigate the subject, the authors use both real and simulated snowpacks with and without dust and calculate stability indices for both snowpacks (dust vs. no dust). These stability indices are then compared to estimate the dust’s influence on snowpack stability. The short answer to the initial question is, not surprisingly, found to be “it depends”. Nevertheless, the paper provides interesting insights, cool modelling chains with ensemble modelling, as well as splendid presentation of the resulting statistics, and I would certainly recommend publication, taking into consideration the detailed comments below.
2.3 Here suddenly you change to present tense!
p.6 l. 24 are not
p.6 l. 26 The stresses due to a skier or due to the load of the overlying snow layers?
p.6. l.28 What about surface hoar as a weak layer?
p.23 l. 13: had not
Formula 1: I guess i = 1 … i_max What is i_max?
Moreover, I really wonder whether dust inhibits growth of surface hoar and this increases snowpack stability for this particular case?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-219-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Léo Viallon-Galinier, 28 Feb 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-219/tc-2022-219-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Léo Viallon-Galinier, 28 Feb 2023
Oscar Dick et al.
Oscar Dick et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
480 | 132 | 16 | 628 | 9 | 6 |
- HTML: 480
- PDF: 132
- XML: 16
- Total: 628
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1