<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
						  <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
						  <channel rdf:about="http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/4855/2013/tcd-7-4855-2013-rss1_0.xml">
						  <title>&quot;Black carbon concentrations from a Tibetan Plateau ice core spanning 1843-1982: recent increases due to emissions and glacier melt&quot; - Interactive Discussion</title>
						  <link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/4855/2013/tcd-7-4855-2013-discussion.html</link>
						  <description>&quot;Black carbon concentrations from a Tibetan Plateau ice core spanning 1843-1982: recent increases due to emissions and glacier melt&quot; - Interactive Discussion</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="" /><rdf:li resource="" /><rdf:li resource="" /><rdf:li resource="" /><rdf:li resource="" /><rdf:li resource="" /><rdf:li resource="" /><rdf:li resource="" /><rdf:li resource="" /></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about=""><title>AC C2954: 'Normalized data as a solution to address data limitations', Susan Kaspari, 04 Jan 2014</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2954/2014/tcd-7-C2954-2014.pdf</link><description>AC C2954: 'Normalized data as a solution to address data limitations', Susan Kaspari, 04 Jan 2014</description><dc:date>2014-01-04T03:37:41+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about=""><title>AC C2952: 'Clarification regarding albedo reductions from BC in the presence of dust.', Susan Kaspari, 04 Jan 2014</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2952/2014/tcd-7-C2952-2014.pdf</link><description>AC C2952: 'Clarification regarding albedo reductions from BC in the presence of dust.', Susan Kaspari, 04 Jan 2014</description><dc:date>2014-01-04T03:28:07+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about=""><title>RC C2936: 'The authors do not believe their own numbers.', Anonymous Referee #4, 02 Jan 2014</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2936/2014/tcd-7-C2936-2014.pdf</link><description>RC C2936: 'The authors do not believe their own numbers.', Anonymous Referee #4, 02 Jan 2014</description><dc:date>2014-01-02T21:54:43+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about=""><title>RC C2853: 'Need further works before the acceptance.', Anonymous Referee #3, 25 Dec 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2853/2013/tcd-7-C2853-2013.pdf</link><description>RC C2853: 'Need further works before the acceptance.', Anonymous Referee #3, 25 Dec 2013</description><dc:date>2013-12-25T00:34:34+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about=""><title>AC C2813: 'Black carbon increase due to deposition vs. melt: analysis of accumulation rate records and black carbon flux', Susan Kaspari, 22 Dec 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2813/2013/tcd-7-C2813-2013.pdf</link><description>AC C2813: 'Black carbon increase due to deposition vs. melt: analysis of accumulation rate records and black carbon flux', Susan Kaspari, 22 Dec 2013</description><dc:date>2013-12-22T17:23:54+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about=""><title>AC C2789: 'Revised figures to more clearly display data trends', Susan Kaspari, 22 Dec 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2789/2013/tcd-7-C2789-2013.pdf</link><description>AC C2789: 'Revised figures to more clearly display data trends', Susan Kaspari, 22 Dec 2013</description><dc:date>2013-12-22T00:55:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about=""><title>AC C2786: 'Clarification regarding  &quot;contradictory conclusions&quot;', Susan Kaspari, 20 Dec 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2786/2013/tcd-7-C2786-2013.pdf</link><description>AC C2786: 'Clarification regarding  &quot;contradictory conclusions&quot;', Susan Kaspari, 20 Dec 2013</description><dc:date>2013-12-20T17:55:48+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about=""><title>RC C2621: 'new data from important region, analysis has limited utility', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Dec 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2621/2013/tcd-7-C2621-2013.pdf</link><description>RC C2621: 'new data from important region, analysis has limited utility', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Dec 2013</description><dc:date>2013-12-03T05:39:13+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about=""><title>RC C2390: 'Well written paper without substantive conclusions', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Nov 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2390/2013/tcd-7-C2390-2013.pdf</link><description>RC C2390: 'Well written paper without substantive conclusions', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Nov 2013</description><dc:date>2013-11-16T05:44:54+01:00</dc:date></item></rdf:RDF>