<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
						   <!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">
						   <rss version="0.91">
						   <channel>
						   <title>&quot;Black carbon concentrations from a Tibetan Plateau ice core spanning 1843-1982: recent increases due to emissions and glacier melt&quot; - Interactive Discussion</title>
						   <link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/4855/2013/tcd-7-4855-2013-discussion.html</link>
						   <description>&quot;Black carbon concentrations from a Tibetan Plateau ice core spanning 1843-1982: recent increases due to emissions and glacier melt&quot; - Interactive Discussion</description>
						   <language>en</language><item><title>AC C2954: 'Normalized data as a solution to address data limitations', Susan Kaspari, 04 Jan 2014</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2954/2014/tcd-7-C2954-2014.pdf</link><description>AC C2954: 'Normalized data as a solution to address data limitations', Susan Kaspari, 04 Jan 2014</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 03:37:41 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>AC C2952: 'Clarification regarding albedo reductions from BC in the presence of dust.', Susan Kaspari, 04 Jan 2014</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2952/2014/tcd-7-C2952-2014.pdf</link><description>AC C2952: 'Clarification regarding albedo reductions from BC in the presence of dust.', Susan Kaspari, 04 Jan 2014</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 03:28:07 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>RC C2936: 'The authors do not believe their own numbers.', Anonymous Referee #4, 02 Jan 2014</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2936/2014/tcd-7-C2936-2014.pdf</link><description>RC C2936: 'The authors do not believe their own numbers.', Anonymous Referee #4, 02 Jan 2014</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:54:43 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>RC C2853: 'Need further works before the acceptance.', Anonymous Referee #3, 25 Dec 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2853/2013/tcd-7-C2853-2013.pdf</link><description>RC C2853: 'Need further works before the acceptance.', Anonymous Referee #3, 25 Dec 2013</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 00:34:34 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>AC C2813: 'Black carbon increase due to deposition vs. melt: analysis of accumulation rate records and black carbon flux', Susan Kaspari, 22 Dec 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2813/2013/tcd-7-C2813-2013.pdf</link><description>AC C2813: 'Black carbon increase due to deposition vs. melt: analysis of accumulation rate records and black carbon flux', Susan Kaspari, 22 Dec 2013</description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 17:23:54 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>AC C2789: 'Revised figures to more clearly display data trends', Susan Kaspari, 22 Dec 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2789/2013/tcd-7-C2789-2013.pdf</link><description>AC C2789: 'Revised figures to more clearly display data trends', Susan Kaspari, 22 Dec 2013</description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 00:55:00 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>AC C2786: 'Clarification regarding  &quot;contradictory conclusions&quot;', Susan Kaspari, 20 Dec 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2786/2013/tcd-7-C2786-2013.pdf</link><description>AC C2786: 'Clarification regarding  &quot;contradictory conclusions&quot;', Susan Kaspari, 20 Dec 2013</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:55:48 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>RC C2621: 'new data from important region, analysis has limited utility', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Dec 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2621/2013/tcd-7-C2621-2013.pdf</link><description>RC C2621: 'new data from important region, analysis has limited utility', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Dec 2013</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 05:39:13 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>RC C2390: 'Well written paper without substantive conclusions', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Nov 2013</title><link>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/7/C2390/2013/tcd-7-C2390-2013.pdf</link><description>RC C2390: 'Well written paper without substantive conclusions', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Nov 2013</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:44:54 +0100</pubDate></item></channel>
							</rss>