<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-9-1933-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Photopolarimetric retrievals of snow properties</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Photopolarimetric retrievals of snow properties}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Ottaviani et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ottaviani</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          <email>matteo.ottaviani@nasa.gov</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>van Diedenhoven</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5622-8619</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cairns</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Center for Climate System Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">M. Ottaviani (matteo.ottaviani@nasa.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>8</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>1933</fpage><lpage>1942</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1933/2015/tc-9-1933-2015.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1933/2015/tc-9-1933-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1933/2015/tc-9-1933-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1933/2015/tc-9-1933-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Polarimetric observations of snow surfaces, obtained in the
410–2264 nm range with the Research Scanning Polarimeter
onboard the NASA ER-2 high-altitude aircraft, are analyzed and
presented. These novel measurements are of interest to the remote
sensing community because the overwhelming brightness of snow
plagues aerosol and cloud retrievals based on airborne and spaceborne
total reflection measurements. The spectral signatures of the
polarized reflectance of snow are therefore worthwhile investigating
in order to provide guidance for the adaptation of algorithms
currently employed for the retrieval of aerosol properties over soil
and vegetated surfaces. At the same time, the increased information
content of polarimetric measurements allows for a meaningful
characterization of the snow medium. In our case, the grains are
modeled as hexagonal prisms of variable aspect ratios and microscale
roughness, yielding retrievals of the grains' scattering asymmetry
parameter, shape and size. The results agree with our previous
findings based on a more limited data set, with the majority of
retrievals leading to moderately rough crystals of extreme aspect
ratios, for each scene corresponding to a single value of the
asymmetry parameter.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The development of accurate techniques for the retrieval of
climatologically relevant parameters in snow-covered regions is of
obvious importance for the success of climate model
predictions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.1"/>. For instance, the
retrieval of grain size and surface temperature leads to
information that can be used to map the snow melting state,
valuable to understand the mass balance of the ice
sheets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.2"/>. Passive optical sensors are
employed in this regard to evince the optical and microphysical
properties of snow grains from measurements of snow reflectance,
and advanced algorithms have been applied to data collected by the
MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and sensors
with similar capabilities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.3"/>. However, the limited information content of such
measurements translates into uniqueness problems during the
retrieval process, with the result that operational snow products
are still limited to snow covered area and albedo (with the
exception of the recent addition to MODIS of the dust radiative
forcing product as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="altparen.4"/>). Polarimetric remote
sensing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.5"/> adds to MODIS-type
observations because it can provide information on the ice grain
shape <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.6"/> and an accurate
characterization of the optical and microphysical properties of
aerosols present in the scene, including possible impurities
embedded in the snowpack. The benefits of passive polarimetric
observations originate from both their extreme sensitivity to
particle microphysics and the specifics of surface polarized
reflectance. For conventional land types (soil, vegetation), the
latter can be effectively parameterized as a scaled Fresnel
reflection function with negligible spectral dependence.  As
a consequence, the separation of the signal into its surface and
atmospheric contributions (i.e., the atmospheric correction
procedure) is achieved with improved accuracy.</p>
      <p>There certainly is debate on the applicability of the radiative
transfer theory to such a densely packed medium as snow. However,
the formalism is recognized to model the total reflectance with
sufficient accuracy for reasons likely associated with the large
number of scattering events taking place within the
snowpack. Based on this assumption, the method is expected to
perform even better for the polarization component because the
polarimetric signatures of a medium are known to originate from
its top layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.7"/>: deeper into the medium
(i.e., past the first units of optical depth) multiple scattering
randomizes polarization.</p>
      <p>The NASA GISS Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.8"/>), born as an aerosol research instrument,
provides a target's total and polarized reflectance with high
accuracy in nine bands between 410 and 2264 nm and at 152
viewing angles per scene. Specifically, the dimensionless reflectances are obtained from the measurements of the first three components of the Stokes vector (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) as follows:

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>total reflectance</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>polarized reflectance</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the (annual average) extraterrestrial solar irradiance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is corrected for the Sun–Earth distance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the solar zenith angle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>A recent deployment led to the first
published study of the polarimetric signatures of snow reflectance
from airborne observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="altparen.9"/>, hereafter
referred to as O12). In that case, the measurements were acquired
over a topologically complex terrain in the Yosemite National Park
region and processed with an automated, iterative atmospheric
correction scheme purposely created to analyze the spectral
dependence of the polarized reflectance. A preliminary retrieval
of crystal microphysical and optical properties was also
tested. The purpose of this new work is to apply the same
atmospheric correction procedure and to extend the surface
properties retrieval scheme to a more recent data set of improved
quality, in terms of the flatness of the surveyed terrain.</p>
      <p>In the next section we describe the data collection, and in
Sect. 3 the processing scheme. In Sect. 4 we discuss the results
obtained from the analysis. The conclusions are found in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data collection</title>
      <p>The data analyzed here were collected onboard the high-altitude
ER-2 aircraft during the POlarimeter Definition EXperiment (PODEX)
mission, a NASA effort to ultimately test and compare the
performance of different polarimeters, as part of the Decadal
Survey activities and in preparation of the Studies of Emissions
and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by
Regional Surveys (SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS) campaign.  Compared to more traditional
aircraft such as the King Air B200 used in O12, the ER-2 offers
the advantages of a perspective more similar to that of
a satellite. For example, interference caused by cirrus clouds is
readily assessed using the RSP 1880 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> channel, which is
usually very dark because of the strong absorption by tropospheric
water vapor that masks the surface, and is therefore very
sensitive to high-altitude clouds. There is in fact interest in
exploiting this wavelength as a cirrus screener in a broader
context, since cold places tend to have dry atmospheres and the
reflectance of snow at 1880 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is much less than at, say,
1380 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (the effective strength of absorption by ice at
1880 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is twice that exhibited at 1380 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Also,
RSP operations on the ER-2 benefit from the stable attitude
intrinsic to stratospheric flights, which enhances data quality
since the RSP scans along the flight track (approximately
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on either side of nadir) to assemble the multiangle
view of a target's reflectance from subsequent scans.</p>
      <p>About a dozen snow-covered targets were selected for the
6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> flight over Colorado and the Sierra Nevada range in
California on 15 March 2012. Well-formed snowpacks with little to
no interference from vegetation and flatness of terrain were the
main priorities. Three scenes were chosen for this analysis. The
Grand Mesa plateau (39<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>08<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
108<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in western
Colorado exhibits remarkable flatness and was covered by a consistent snowpack
with a depth of greater than 1 m as reported by nearly simultaneous
in situ surveys (Mesa Lakes snow telemetry (SNOTEL) site, managed by the Natural
Resources and Conservation Service of the US Department of
Agriculture; M. Skiles, personal communication, 2013). Lake
Granby (40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 105<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>53<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the third-largest body of water in
Colorado and second-largest reservoir, was frozen at the time of
the overpass and covered with a thin layer of aged, likely
metamorphosed snow (the SNOTEL site at Stillwater Creek recorded
a snow depth of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The scene denoted by Derby
Peak (39<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>59<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 107<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is another high-altitude, rather flat region
(in fact belonging to the Flat Tops Wilderness Area).  The closest
SNOTEL site, at Trapper Lake, 2950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, reported
a snow depth of 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methodology</title>
      <p>The method employed for the atmospheric correction
procedure is explained in detail in O12, to which the reader can refer if
interested in the rigorous mathematical formalism. To provide a brief
summary, the signal measured by the instrument is a nonlinear function of the
surface reflectance due to the interaction of the radiation reflected by the
surface with the atmosphere above. For this reason, a linear regression
cannot be applied to infer the model parameters. Nevertheless, a cost
function with the departure of the model from the measurements can still be
computed and minimized, provided the availability of the derivatives
(Jacobians) of the radiative transfer model with respect to the descriptive
parameters. The Jacobians, generated without extra-computational cost from
the linearization of the doubling–adding radiative transfer code in use at GISS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.10"/>, are used
in an iterative scheme based on an inversion and optimization procedure of
the Gaussian–Newton kind <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.11"/> to search for a minimum of the
cost function. The result is the decoupling of the total signal measured at
instrument altitude into its surface and atmospheric contributions,
i.e., an automated atmospheric correction. Within this scheme, the surface
total reflectance is expressed as the weighted sum of three kernels as in the
RossThick–LiSparse form <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.12"/>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>iso</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vol</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vol</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>geo</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>geo</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the scattering angle. The three terms on the
right-hand side describe different scattering mechanisms:
a Lambertian component for isotropic reflection, a volumetric term
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for scattering from small structures and
a geometric term <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>geo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a macroscopic shadowing from
large objects. Although this model was created for reflection from
surfaces other than snow, its mathematical form adapts without
problems to snowpacks, with the isotropic kernel systematically
assuming the largest weight because of the dominance of multiple
scattering in the reflection of light from snow.</p>
      <p>As far as the polarized reflectance is concerned, we instead employ
a scaled Fresnel kernel elsewhere used for vegetated
surfaces <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.13"/>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        with the fractional polarized reflectance
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.14"/>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8}{8}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where in our case <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the indices of refraction of pure
air and ice, respectively, and the angle of refraction <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is connected
to the angle of incidence <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by Snell's law.</p>
      <p>For the retrieval of crystal habit, the
polarized reflectance at 864 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is used because of the
very weak ice absorption at this wavelength and the relatively
weak Rayleigh scattering contribution.
Ice crystals are found to vary within a virtually countless set of shapes,
but, limited by the lack of constraints on the correct
optical properties, very few studies have departed from the common
practice of assuming spherical shapes for the snow grains, an
approximation which can negatively impact the quality of the
albedo products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.15"/>.
Among the available optical models for non-spherical grains are for example
those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx5" id="text.16"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.17"/>. Incidentally,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.18"/> recently attempted to fit measured phase functions of
blowing snow by using phase functions of several complex habits provided
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.19"/> in addition to phase functions of other habits. However,
the selection of habits in their study remained limited, and to fit the data
a rather arbitrary mixture of droxtals, aggregates of plates and Koch
fractals was needed, leading them to conclude that this mixture “most
probably does not represent properly the actual distribution of snow grain
shapes in blowing snow (or snow on ground)”. In our case, the
description of the snowpack is refined by treating it as
a compact, optically semi-infinite medium composed of ice crystals
modeled as hexagonal prisms with variable aspect ratios and
microscale facet roughness.</p>
      <p>It should be noted that for the specific task of remote
sensing of aerosols over snow, a model capable of accurately
reproducing the contribution of the surface to the total signal
should be considered successful regardless of its capability to
mimic the true shape of the crystals.
Our approach is based on the recognition that
hexagonal plates and columns can be effectively used as radiative
proxies for more complex crystal
habits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.20"/>. As
demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.21"/>, matching measured
polarized reflectances with a look-up table of values simulated by adjusting the
aspect ratios and roughness parameters of simple hexagonal
particles yields an estimate of the asymmetry parameter of
more complex ice crystals. Our
database, initially created to be of use for the retrieval of ice
cloud properties, contains 765 different combinations of aspect
ratios and roughness parameters and was computationally assembled
by running Monte Carlo simulations based on geometric
optics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.22"/>, the performance of which was evaluated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.23"/>.
The retrieved aspect ratios are interpreted as the mean of the aspect ratios of the components of the complex crystals.</p>
      <p>The microscale surface roughness is statistically accounted for by tilting,
for each interaction with a ray, the normal to the crystal surface by an
angle randomly selected in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
interval, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is referred to as the roughness parameter. In our
case, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is limited to 0.7 (i.e., a maximum tilt angle for the facet of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>63</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) because for higher values the probability of unphysical
scattering events strongly increases, resulting in progressively larger loss
of accuracy of the GO calculations of a
given number of rays. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="normal.24"/> have shown that various other
definitions and parameterizations of crystal surface roughness lead to
similar results. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="normal.25"/> found that such approaches are efficient yet
accurate treatments of microscale roughness. Furthermore, the effects of
microscale surface roughness and macroscale crystal distortion were shown to
be largely equivalent by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="normal.26"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Atmospherically corrected polarized (second row) and total (third
row) reflectance for three snowfields (columns) overflown in Colorado,
USA. The first row shows real-time imagery from the high-resolution camera
onboard the ER-2, captioned by the scene altitude above sea level together
with the solar zenith angle and the Sun-sensor
relative azimuth at the time of
observation. The last row pertains to the search of the optimal ice grain
model: the contour plots map the RMSE of the fit to the polarized reflectance
at 864 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> when simulating the snowpack with each crystal habit (i.e.,
each combination of aspect ratio and roughness parameter) in the database.
The red circles locate the values of the RMSE falling under a predetermined
threshold and are taken to represent the retrieved (optimal) habits.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1933/2015/tc-9-1933-2015-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The retrieval of grain size is instead based on the total
reflectance at selected shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands where ice
absorption is high. The total reflectance of an optically
semi-infinite snow layer at 2264 and 1594 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
effectively determined by the asymmetry parameter and the single
scattering albedo at the respective wavelength, which in turn is mainly
determined by the effective diameter of the ice crystals. The
grain diameter is not unequivocally defined in the literature,
which is understandable since the definition of snow grain itself
is often ambiguous. There is a consensus for expressing grain
effective diameter as proportional to the ratio of crystal volume
to projected area, but the value of the multiplier can vary
according to the specific choice of the
author <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.27"/>. In line with
several recent publications (see, for
example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx19" id="altparen.28"/>), we define it as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times the
ratio of the crystal volume over its surface area, as outlined in
Appendix A, which includes the details of the relationship to
geometric size. The effective diameter of snow for a given scene is estimated
by matching the measured reflectance with an ice crystal model whose
asymmetry parameter is consistent with that retrieved for that scene using
the method described above. To this end, various
modified gamma size distributions were applied to yield varying
effective diameters, and the radiative transfer
code was used to simulate the corresponding 1594 and
2264 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reflectances <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.29"/>. For
conditions equivalent to those found in snowpacks, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.30"/>
showed that the errors in retrieved effective radius attributable
to the use of the conventional geometric optics approach are below
5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Another important aspect to consider is that the
1594 and 2264 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> channels experience different penetration
depths, with the former weighted more towards the top layer, while
the latter probes deeper into the medium; as a consequence, the
retrieved sizes contain information on the vertical structure of
the snowpack <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.31"/>.</p>
      <p>As far as the atmospheric component is concerned, the high
elevation of these alpine regions allowed us to assume negligible
contributions from aerosols, so that in the radiative transfer
code a standard Rayleigh atmosphere was used with a surface
pressure extrapolated at the indicated altitude. Cirrus-free
conditions were guaranteed from the screening procedure described
earlier. The SWIR channels were corrected for the minimal
interference caused by absorption from a standard amount of trace
gases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>The core of our findings is condensed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. For each of the
three scenes (different columns in the figure) the analysis was performed
over a single RSP pixel, corresponding to a spatial
resolution of about 225 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Indeed, averaging over a few
adjacent aggregated scans did not show appreciable scan-to-scan
variability, revealing more or less uniform snow conditions on a scale larger
than the instrument instantaneous field of view. Real-time imagery from the
high-resolution camera onboard the ER-2, overlaid to Google Earth, is
included for context. The second and third rows of
panels show the results of the iterative correction scheme
applied to the relevant RSP channels. With the exception of O12,
the visible and SWIR behavior of the polarized reflectance of
snow has not been previously published.</p>
      <p>The total reflectance exhibits the familiar high spectral albedo
in the visible, albeit with some expected scene-to-scene
variability. Lake Granby in particular shows lower total
reflectance than the other two scenes; in situ simultaneous
surveys from the personnel at the US Forest Service in Arapaho
National Forest reported a snow depth on the order of
5–8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. These values are close to the limit of thickness
required to visually mask the underlying surface, leaving the
possibility that the lake ice underneath the snow cover is
darkening the reflectance. Nevertheless, a layer of a few millimeters is
sufficient to fulfill the semi-infinite approximation at the longer
wavelengths used for the retrieval of grain size: the RSP SWIR channels at
1594 and 2264 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are very dark because of the strong absorption of
ice at these wavelengths.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>The “butterfly” pattern of the contour plot for the asymmetry
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of aspect ratio and roughness parameter resembles
that obtained for the RMSE plots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. The red circles in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> (here in green for Grand Mesa, magenta for Lake Granby
and blue for Derby Peak) that identify the retrieved optimal crystal habits
are found for each scene clustered around a single value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1933/2015/tc-9-1933-2015-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The polarized reflectance
as a function of the scattering angle is very similar among the
three scenes. Note that in the case of Derby Peak the flight
track was oriented at about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>45</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the
principal plane (i.e., the plane defined by the solar azimuth and
the normal to the surface), leading to a smaller range of
scattering angles collected by the RSP. It has already been
observed in O12 as the land model used for the polarized
reflectance converges to zero toward backscatter (scattering
angle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>160</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and in this region agreement with the
data is not to be expected. It is useful to quantify the spectral
spread of the channels by examining the differences from the
reference 2264 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> channel. The signal in this band is in
fact a proxy for the surface contribution, since the Rayleigh
(and fine-mode aerosol) contribution becomes more and more
negligible as the observation windows shifts to the SWIR. If the
spectral differences are small, that same signal can then be
subtracted from the shorter RSP wavelengths when aerosol
retrievals are attempted. The residuals with respect to the
2264 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> polarized reflectance are found to be within
0.005, which as in O12 is larger than conventional land surfaces
but still very small. The polarized reflectance is small too in
absolute value.</p>
      <p>Shifting the attention to the search of a snow model, the plots
at the bottom contour the root mean square error (RMSE) of the
data fit to each combination of aspect ratio and roughness
parameter in the database. Multiple combinations led to
a satisfactory fit to each of the three polarized reflectance
observations, so we considered as optimal all habits with an RMSE
falling below a small threshold value (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These minima, marked with red circles, therefore
correspond to those crystal habits that when used to model the
snowpack at the bottom of the simulated atmosphere yield the best
fits to the data. The analysis shows that the polarized
reflectances are consistent with particles that have components
that are like thin plates or like thin columns, a fact already
observed in O12. Interestingly, the butterfly-like topology of
the RMSE was recognized to closely resemble that obtained for the
asymmetry parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plotted versus the same coordinates
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). In each scene, the optimal crystal habits are
associated with very similar values of the asymmetry parameter
(0.84 for Lake Granby, 0.876 for Derby Peak and 0.90 for Grand
Mesa). This result is understood by considering that the
asymmetry parameter is the main descriptor for the scattering
properties. As demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.32"/> using
a large variety of complex ice crystal shapes, all the
combinations of aspect ratio and roughness parameter fitting
a polarized reflectance measurement are ultimately characterized
by similar values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, they will also yield
similar particle size retrievals.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows the phase function and the degree of linear
polarization, obtained for each scene by averaging the
phase matrices associated with the retrieved minima. The lack of halo peaks
in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range, typical of the phase functions of pristine crystals, and the general
smooth behavior (except from the strong forward peak) are consistent with the
moderate-to-high roughness parameters determined in the analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Phase functions (upper panel) and degree of linear polarization
(DoLP, lower panel), resulting from the
average over the optimal habits retrieved for each scene. The color coding is
the same as for the circles in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1933/2015/tc-9-1933-2015-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>All retrieved parameters are reported for comparison
in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, together with the results of the size
retrievals. Using the simple approach outlined in the previous
section, we obtained effective diameters equal to 152, 182 and
144 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Grand Mesa, Lake Granby and Derby Peak
scene, respectively, when using the RSP band at
2264 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using instead the 1594 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> channel,
diameters typically 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> smaller are obtained for
each scene, which can be explained by the different penetration
depths of the two channels, indicating crystal size increasing
with depth as expected <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.33"/>. These
values, at the lower end of common retrieval ranges, are normally
associated with fresh snow conditions as found in studies based
on other remote sensors in alpine
regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.34"/> and polar
plateaus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.35"/>. However, a direct comparison
is challenged by differences in the definition of grain size,
assumptions on grain sphericity and different penetration depths
achieved by the use of different instrument channels. The larger
grain sizes obtained for the Lake Granby scene were attributed to
the shallow aged snow over the lake, since metamorphosed snow is
recognized to be composed of larger
grains <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.36"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>List of ice crystals' parameters retrieved for the three analyzed
scenes. The value in parentheses indicates the RSP band used in the
retrieval. The effective diameter can be obtained using either the 2264 or
the 1594 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> channel (see text), together with a crystal habit
characterized by the asymmetry parameter retrieved for the corresponding
scene.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Retrieved parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Grand Mesa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lake Granby</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Derby Peak</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asymmetry parameter (864 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.876</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aspect ratio (864 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Roughness parameter (864 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.3–0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.6–0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2–0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Effective diameter (2264 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">152 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">182 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">144 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Effective diameter (1594 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">122 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">152 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">114 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>We have presented the extension of a novel analysis described
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.37"/> to a data set acquired with the
high-accuracy RSP airborne instrument overflying high-altitude
snowfields. The data were processed within an automated
retrieval scheme capable of isolating the surface
contribution to the total signal. The spectral dependence of the retrieved polarized
surface reflectance is slightly larger than for soil or vegetated surfaces, but
nonetheless small relative to typical aerosol contributions (cf. Fig. 6 in O12). This fact has important implications for the
construction of advanced algorithms which aim at the retrieval of
the microphysical properties of aerosol layers located over ice
and snowfields.</p>
      <p>Furthermore, we applied a retrieval procedure which is
demonstrated to yield snow microphysical parameters of primary
climatological interest. <?xmltex \hack{\vadjust{\newpage}}?>We retrieve snowpacks behaving as
a collection of grains of extreme geometries (thin plates and/or
long columns) and moderate to high microscale roughness. These
results reinforce those of our previous study based on a limited
data set acquired over very rugged terrain. For each scene, the
best fits are obtained for a set of crystal habits characterized
by very similar values of the asymmetry parameter and extreme aspect ratios. Size
retrievals were also tested, leading to grain effective diameters in
the 140–180 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range at the top of the snowpack.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Size descriptors for hexagonal prisms</title>
      <p>The results of Macke's geometric optics code <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.38"/> were tabulated with the
choice of the radius of the sphere with equal surface area,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sph</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a size descriptor. This parameter is linked to
the geometric size of hexagonal prisms and to the grain effective
diameter by the following relations:

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hex</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sph</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mtext>(surface area of sphere and hexagonal prism)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hex</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sph</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mtext>(projected surface area of hexagonal prism)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hex</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mtext>(radius or side length of hexagonal prism)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hex</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mtext>(volume of hexagonal prism)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hex</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>(effective diameter),</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aspect ratio, defined as the ratio of
the
cross-section width of the prism to its length. The last expression
is valid for a single particle of any solid shape. In case of
a polydisperse collection of particles, the effective diameter is
obtained through integration over a size distribution:

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denoting the number density of crystals with maximum
dimension <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be defined as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hex</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for plates
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hex</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for columns.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was possible through the dedication of the ER-2 pilots Tom
Ryan, Dean Neeley and Stu Broce. Their exceptional skills and
proactive attitude towards the goals of the mission were critical to
success. The assistance of personnel on the ground was invaluable,
especially that of Hans Moosmüller from the Desert Research
Institute, Davide Sartoni from Mistras-Ropeworks, Rick Brinkam from
Water Services at the City of Grand Junction, Sam Williams and Aldin
Strautins from NOAA, McKenzie Skiles from NASA JPL, Holly King from
the Trappers Lake Lodge, and Dan Matthews and John Saye from the US
Forest Service in Arapaho National Forest. We also thank Rose
Dominguez and Dennis Gearhart from NASA GSFC for providing access to
the ER-2 DCS camera imagery, and the reviewers for improving the overall quality of the manuscript. The RSP data used for this analysis are
publicly available on the GISS server
(<uri>http://data.giss.nasa.gov/pub/rsp/</uri>). The graphs were produced
with IDL<sup>©</sup> supplemented by David Fanning's Coyote
Graphics free library of routines. Partial support from the
Radiation Sciences Program managed by Hal Maring is gratefully
acknowledged.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by:  A. Klein</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aoki et al.(2000)Aoki, Aoki, Fukabori, Hachikubo, Tachibana, and
Nishio</label><mixed-citation>
Aoki, T., Aoki, T., Fukabori, M., Hachikubo, A., Tachibana, Y., and Nishio, F.:
Effects of snow physical parameters on spectral albedo and bidirectional
reflectance of snow surface, J. Geophys. Res., 105,
10219–10236, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Aoki et al.(2007)Aoki, Hori, Motoyoshi, Tanikawa, Hachikubo, Sugiura,
Yasunari, Storvold, Eide, Stamnes et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Aoki, T., Hori, M., Motoyoshi, H., Tanikawa, T., Hachikubo, A., Sugiura, K.,
Yasunari, T. J., Storvold, R., Eide, H. A., Stamnes, K.,   Li, W.,  Nieke, J.,  Nakajima, Y., and  Takahashi, F.:
ADEOS-II/GLI snow/ice products – Part II: Validation results using GLI and
MODIS data, Remote Sens. Environ., 111, 274–290, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Baran(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Baran, A.: A review of the light scattering properties of cirrus, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110, 1239–1260, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Baum et al.(2011)Baum, Yang, Heymsfield, Schmitt, Xie, Bansemer, Hu,
and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Baum, B. A., Yang, P., Heymsfield, A. J., Schmitt, C. G., Xie, Y., Bansemer,
A., Hu, Y.-X., and Zhang, Z.: Improvements in shortwave bulk scattering and
absorption models for the remote sensing of ice clouds, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Climatol., 50, 1037–1056, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Baum et al.(2014)Baum, Yang, Heymsfield, Bansemer, Cole, Merrelli,
Schmitt, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Baum, B. A., Yang, P., Heymsfield, A. J., Bansemer, A., Cole, B. H., Merrelli,
A., Schmitt, C., and Wang, C.: Ice cloud single-scattering property models
with the full phase matrix at wavelengths from 0.2 to 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 146, 123–139,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.02.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.02.029</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bi et al.(2014)Bi, Yang, Liu, Yi, Baum, van Diedenhoven, and
Iwabuchi</label><mixed-citation>Bi, L., Yang, P., Liu, C., Yi, B., Baum, B. A., van Diedenhoven, B., and
Iwabuchi, H.: Assessment of the accuracy of the conventional ray-tracing
technique: Implications in remote sensing and radiative transfer involving
ice clouds, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 46, 158–174, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.03.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.03.017</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Born and Wolf(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Born, M. and Wolf, E.: Principles of optics, Cambridge University Press, 7th
(expanded) Edn., 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Cairns et al.(1999)Cairns, Russell, and Travis</label><mixed-citation>
Cairns, B., Russell, E., and Travis, L.: Research Scanning Polarimeter:
calibration and ground-based measurements, in: Society of Photo-Optical
Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series,  3754,  186–196,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Cairns et al.(2009)Cairns, Waquet, Knobelspiesse, Chowdhary, and
Deuzé</label><mixed-citation>
Cairns, B., Waquet, F., Knobelspiesse, K., Chowdhary, J., and Deuzé, J.:
Polarimetric remote sensing of aerosols over land surfaces, chap. 10,
Springer-Praxis Books in Environmental Sciences, Chichester, UK,
295–325,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Chowdhary et al.(2012)Chowdhary, Cairns, Waquet, Knobelspiesse,
Ottaviani, Redemann, Travis, and Mishchenko</label><mixed-citation>Chowdhary, J., Cairns, B., Waquet, F., Knobelspiesse, K., Ottaviani, M.,
Redemann, J., Travis, L., and Mishchenko, M.: Sensitivity of multiangle,
multispectral polarimetric remote sensing over open oceans to water-leaving
radiance: Analyses of RSP data acquired during the MILAGRO campaign, Remote
Sens. Environ., 118, 284–308, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.003</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Comiso(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Comiso, J. C.: Arctic warming signals from satellite observations, Weather,
61, 70–76, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>De Haan et al.(1987)De Haan, Bosma, and Hovenier</label><mixed-citation>
De Haan, J., Bosma, P., and Hovenier, J.: The adding method for multiple
scattering calculations of polarized light, Astronomy  Astrophysics,
183, 371–391, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Diner et al.(2007)Diner, Davis, Hancock, Gutt, Chipman, and
Cairns</label><mixed-citation>
Diner, D. J., Davis, A., Hancock, B., Gutt, G., Chipman, R. A., and Cairns, B.:
Dual-photoelastic-modulator-based polarimetric imaging concept for aerosol
remote sensing, Appl. Optics, 46, 8428–8445, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Dozier and Painter(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Dozier, J. and Painter, T.: Multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing of
alpine snow properties, Annu. Rev. Earth  Pl. Sc., 32,
465–494, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Dubovik et al.(2011)Dubovik, Herman, Holdak, Lapyonok, Tanré,
Deuzé, Ducos, Sinyuk, and Lopatin</label><mixed-citation>Dubovik, O., Herman, M., Holdak, A., Lapyonok, T., Tanré, D., Deuzé, J.
L., Ducos, F., Sinyuk, A., and Lopatin, A.: Statistically optimized inversion
algorithm for enhanced retrieval of aerosol properties from spectral
multi-angle polarimetric satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4,
975–1018, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-975-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-975-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Fu(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, Q.: A new parameterization of an asymmetry factor of cirrus clouds for
climate models, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 4140–4150, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Hasekamp et al.(2011)Hasekamp, Litvinov, and Butz</label><mixed-citation>Hasekamp, O. P., Litvinov, P., and Butz, A.: Aerosol properties over the ocean
from parasol multiangle photopolarimetric measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 116,
D14204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015469" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015469</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Hori et al.(2007)Hori, Aoki, Stamnes, and Li</label><mixed-citation>
Hori, M., Aoki, T., Stamnes, K., and Li, W.: ADEOS-II/GLI snow/ice
products – Part III: Retrieved results, Remote Sens. Environ., 111,
291–336, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Jin et al.(2008)Jin, Charlock, Yang, Xie, and Miller</label><mixed-citation>
Jin, Z., Charlock, T., Yang, P., Xie, Y., and Miller, W.: Snow optical
properties for different particle shapes with application to snow grain size
retrieval and MODIS/CERES radiance comparison over Antarctica, Remote
Sens. Environ., 112, 3563–3581, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Knobelspiesse et al.(2012)Knobelspiesse, Cairns, Mishchenko,
Chowdhary, Tsigaridis, van Diedenhoven, Martin, Ottaviani, and
Alexandrov</label><mixed-citation>
Knobelspiesse, K., Cairns, B., Mishchenko, M., Chowdhary, J., Tsigaridis, K.,
van Diedenhoven, B., Martin, W., Ottaviani, M., and Alexandrov, M.: Analysis
of fine-mode aerosol retrieval capabilities by different passive remote
sensing instrument designs, Opt. Express, 20, 21457–21484, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Kokhanovsky and Zege(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Kokhanovsky, A. and Zege, E.: Scattering optics of snow, Appl. Optics, 43,
1589–1602, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Kokhanovsky et al.(2011)Kokhanovsky, Rozanov, Aoki, Odermatt,
Brockmann, Krüger, Bouvet, Drusch, and Hori</label><mixed-citation>
Kokhanovsky, A., Rozanov, V., Aoki, T., Odermatt, D., Brockmann, C.,
Krüger, O., Bouvet, M., Drusch, M., and Hori, M.: Sizing snow grains
using backscattered solar light, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32,
6975–7008, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Li et al.(2001)Li, Stamnes, Chen, and Xiong</label><mixed-citation>
Li, W., Stamnes, K., Chen, B., and Xiong, X.: Snow grain size retrieved from
near-infrared radiances at multiple wavelengths, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 28, 1699–1702, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Liu et al.(2014)Liu, Panetta, and Yang</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, C., Panetta, R. L., and Yang, P.: The effective equivalence of geometric
irregularity and surface roughness in determining particle single-scattering
properties, Opt. Express, 22, 23620–23627, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Lucht et al.(2000)Lucht, Schaaf, and Strahler</label><mixed-citation>
Lucht, W., Schaaf, C., and Strahler, A.: An algorithm for the retrieval of
albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models, IEEE T.  Geosci. Remote, 38, 977–998, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Lyapustin et al.(2009)Lyapustin, Tedesco, Wang, Aoki, Hori, and
Kokhanovsky</label><mixed-citation>
Lyapustin, A., Tedesco, M., Wang, Y., Aoki, T., Hori, M., and Kokhanovsky, A.:
Retrieval of snow grain size over Greenland from MODIS, Remote Sens.  Environ, 113, 1976–1987, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Macke et al.(1996)Macke, Mueller, and Raschke</label><mixed-citation>
Macke, A., Mueller, J., and Raschke, E.: Single Scattering Properties of
Atmospheric Ice Crystals, J. Atmos. Sci., 53,
2813–2825, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Nadal and Bréon(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Nadal, F. and Bréon, F.-M.: Parameterization of surface polarized
reflectance derived from POLDER spaceborne measurements, IEEE T.  Geosci. Remote,  37, 1709–1718, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Negi and Kokhanovsky(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Negi, H. S. and Kokhanovsky, A.: Retrieval of snow grain size and albedo of
western Himalayan snow cover using satellite data, The Cryosphere, 5,
831–847, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-831-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-5-831-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Neshyba et al.(2013)Neshyba, Lowen, Benning, Lawson, and
Rowe</label><mixed-citation>
Neshyba, S., Lowen, B., Benning, M., Lawson, A., and Rowe, P.: Roughness
metrics of prismatic facets of ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 3309–3318, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Nolin and Dozier(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Nolin, A. and Dozier, J.: A hyperspectral method for remotely sensing the
grain size of snow, Remote Sens. Environ., 74, 207–216, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Ottaviani et al.(2012a)Ottaviani, Cairns, Chowdhary,
Diedenhoven, Knobelspiesse, Hostetler, Ferrare, Burton, Hair, Obland, and
Rogers</label><mixed-citation>Ottaviani, M., Cairns, B., Chowdhary, J., Diedenhoven, B. V., Knobelspiesse,
K., Hostetler, C., Ferrare, R., Burton, S., Hair, J., Obland, M. D., and
Rogers, R.: Polarimetric retrievals of surface and cirrus clouds properties
in the region affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, Remote Sens.  Environ., 121, 389–403, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.016</ext-link>,
2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Ottaviani et al.(2012b)Ottaviani, Cairns, Ferrare, and
Rogers</label><mixed-citation>Ottaviani, M., Cairns, B., Ferrare, R., and Rogers, R.: Iterative atmospheric
correction scheme and the polarization color of alpine snow, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 113, 789–804,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.03.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.03.014</ext-link>,
2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Painter et al.(2009)Painter, Rittger, McKenzie, Slaughter, Davis, and
Dozier</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T., Rittger, K., McKenzie, C., Slaughter, P., Davis, R., and Dozier,
J.: Retrieval of subpixel snow covered area, grain size, and albedo from
MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 868–879, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Painter et al.(2012)Painter, Bryant, and Skiles</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Bryant, A. C., and Skiles, S. M.: Radiative forcing by light
absorbing impurities in snow from MODIS surface reflectance data, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 39, L17502, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052457" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052457</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Räisänen et al.(2015)Räisänen, Kokhanovsky, Guyot,
Jourdan, and Nousiainen</label><mixed-citation>Räisänen, P., Kokhanovsky, A., Guyot, G., Jourdan, O., and Nousiainen,
T.: Parameterization of single-scattering properties of snow, The Cryosphere,
9, 1277–1301, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1277-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-1277-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Rodgers(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C.: Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding theory and practice,
vol. 2 of Series on atmospheric, oceanic and planetary physics,
World Scientific Publishing Company, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Stamnes et al.(2007)Stamnes, Li, Eide, Aoki, Hori, and
Storvold</label><mixed-citation>
Stamnes, K., Li, W., Eide, H., Aoki, T., Hori, M., and Storvold, R.:
ADEOS-II/GLI snow/ice products – Part I: Scientific basis, Remote Sens.
Environ., 111, 258–273, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Stamnes et al.(2011)Stamnes, Hamre, Stamnes, Ryzhikov, Biryulina,
Mahoney, Hauss, and Sei</label><mixed-citation>Stamnes, K., Hamre, B., Stamnes, J., Ryzhikov, G., Biryulina, M., Mahoney, R.,
Hauss, B., and Sei, A.: Modeling of radiation transport in coupled
atmosphere-snow-ice-ocean systems, J. Quant. Spectrosc.
Ra., 112, 714–726, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.06.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.06.006</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Tedesco and Kokhanovsky(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Tedesco, M. and Kokhanovsky, A.: The semi-analytical snow retrieval algorithm
and its application to MODIS data, Remote Sens. Environ., 111,
228–241, 2007.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Um and McFarquhar(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Um, J. and McFarquhar, G. M.: Single-scattering properties of aggregates of
bullet rosettes in cirrus, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim.,
46, 757–775, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Um and McFarquhar(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Um, J. and McFarquhar, G. M.: Single-scattering properties of aggregates of
plates, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 135, 291–304,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>van Diedenhoven et al.(2012)van Diedenhoven, Cairns, Geogdzhayev,
Fridlind, Ackerman, Yang, and Baum</label><mixed-citation>van Diedenhoven, B., Cairns, B., Geogdzhayev, I. V., Fridlind, A. M.,
Ackerman, A. S., Yang, P., and Baum, B. A.: Remote sensing of ice crystal
asymmetry parameter using multi-directional polarization measurements – Part
1: Methodology and evaluation with simulated measurements, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 5, 2361–2374, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2361-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-2361-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>van Diedenhoven et al.(2013)van Diedenhoven, Cairns, Fridlind,
Ackerman, and Garrett</label><mixed-citation>van Diedenhoven, B., Cairns, B., Fridlind, A. M., Ackerman, A. S., and
Garrett, T. J.: Remote sensing of ice crystal asymmetry parameter using
multi-directional polarization measurements – Part 2: Application to the
Research Scanning Polarimeter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3185–3203,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3185-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-3185-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>van Diedenhoven et al.(2014)van Diedenhoven, Fridlind, Cairns, and
Ackerman</label><mixed-citation>
van Diedenhoven, B., Fridlind, A. M., Cairns, B., and Ackerman, A. S.:
Variation of ice crystal size, shape, and asymmetry parameter in tops of
tropical deep convective clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 11–809, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Wang et al.(2009)Wang, Liou, Ou, Mace, and Deng</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Liou, K., Ou, S. S., Mace, G., and Deng, M.: Remote sensing of cirrus
cloud vertical size profile using MODIS data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D09205, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011327</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Wanner et al.(1995)Wanner, Li, and Strahler</label><mixed-citation>
Wanner, W., Li, X., and Strahler, A.: On the derivation of kernels for
kernel-driven models of bidirectional reflectance, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 21077–21089, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Waquet et al.(2009)Waquet, Cairns, Knobelspiesse, Chowdhary, Travis,
Schmid, and Mishchenko</label><mixed-citation>Waquet, F., Cairns, B., Knobelspiesse, K., Chowdhary, J., Travis, L., Schmid,
B., and Mishchenko, M.: Polarimetric remote sensing of aerosols over land,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D01206, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010619</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Warren(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Warren, S.: Optical properties of snow, Rev. Geophys., 20, 67–89,
1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Yang et al.(2008)Yang, Hong, Kattawar, Minnis, and Hu</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, P., Hong, G., Kattawar, G. W., Minnis, P., and Hu, Y.: Uncertainties
associated with the surface texture of ice particles in satellite-based
retrieval of cirrus clouds: Part II – Effect of particle surface roughness on
retrieved cloud optical thickness and effective particle size, Geoscience and
Remote Sensing, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens., 46, 1948–1957, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Yang et al.(2013)Yang, Bi, Baum, Liou, Kattawar, Mishchenko, and
Cole</label><mixed-citation>Yang, P., Bi, L., Baum, B. A., Liou, K.-N., Kattawar, G. W., Mishchenko, M. I.,
and Cole, B.: Spectrally consistent scattering, absorption, and polarization
properties of atmospheric ice crystals at wavelengths from 0.2 to 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 330–347, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Zatko et al.(2013)Zatko, Grenfell, Alexander, Doherty, Thomas, and
Yang</label><mixed-citation>Zatko, M. C., Grenfell, T. C., Alexander, B., Doherty, S. J., Thomas, J. L.,
and Yang, X.: The influence of snow grain size and impurities on the vertical
profiles of actinic flux and associated NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions on the Antarctic and
Greenland ice sheets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3547–3567,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3547-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-3547-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Zege et al.(2011)Zege, Katsev, Malinka, Prikhach, Heygster, and
Wiebe</label><mixed-citation>
Zege, E., Katsev, I., Malinka, A., Prikhach, A., Heygster, G., and Wiebe, H.:
Algorithm for retrieval of the effective snow grain size and pollution amount
from satellite measurements, Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 2674–2685,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Zwally and Giovinetto(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Zwally, H. J. and Giovinetto, M. B.: Overview and assessment of Antarctic
ice-sheet mass balance estimates: 1992–2009, Surv.  Geophys., 32,
351–376, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
