<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-20-2923-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Simulating liquid water distribution at the pore scale in snow: water retention curves and effective transport properties</article-title><alt-title>Simulating liquid water distribution at pore scale in snow</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Bouvet</surname><given-names>Lisa</given-names></name>
          <email>lisa.bouvet@meteo.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6335-0484</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Allet</surname><given-names>Nicolas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2531-6905</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Calonne</surname><given-names>Neige</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-0186</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Flin</surname><given-names>Frédéric</given-names></name>
          <email>frederic.flin@meteo.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9931-7769</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Geindreau</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6899-4879</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Météo-France, CNRS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Toulouse, CNRM, Centre d’Études de la Neige, 38000 Grenoble, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, 3SR, Grenoble, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Lisa Bouvet (lisa.bouvet@meteo.fr) and Frédéric Flin (frederic.flin@meteo.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>2923</fpage><lpage>2946</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>June</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Lisa Bouvet et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e127">Liquid water flows by gravity and capillarity in snow, drastically modifying its properties. Unlike dry snow, observing wet snow remains a challenge and data from 3D pore-scale imaging are scarce. This limitation hampers our understanding of the water, heat, and vapor transport processes in wet snow, as well as their modeling. Here, we explore a simulation-based approach, namely a pore morphology model, to simulate the distribution of liquid water in the pore space of snow for various water contents. Using the Young-Laplace equation and pore radius as a probe, liquid water is gradually introduced and then removed during wetting (imbibition) and drying (drainage) simulations, respectively. This model was applied to a set of 34 3D tomography images of dry snow of varied microstructures. For each microstructure, a series of 3D images of wet snow at different stages of drainage and imbibition was obtained. From these series, we examine key properties for the modeling of wet snow processes. First, we describe the water retention curves obtained for imbibition and drainage for the different microstructures. The classical van Genuchten model is used to describe our simulated water retention curves. The obtained model parameters, i.e., the shape parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the residual water content, are compared to the ones obtained in laboratory experiments from literature. New parameterizations of these parameters based on snow density, grain size, and the interfacial mean curvature are proposed. Then, we present estimates of hydraulic conductivity, water permeability, effective thermal conductivity, and water vapor diffusivity, computed on the simulated wet snow images. We study their evolution in relation to water content, density, and snow type. Our estimates are compared to existing parameterizations of the wet snow properties; new parameterizations are proposed when needed. Our simulations are a first step toward a better characterization of the micro-scale distribution of liquid water in snow, and contribute to improving the modeling of the hydraulic and physical properties of wet snow.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Agence Nationale de la Recherche</funding-source>
<award-id>ANR-19-CE01-0009</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e161">Wet snow is characterized by the presence of liquid water in the dry snow microstructure itself, composed of air and ice. Liquid water, introduced by rain or melt, is transported in the snowpack and causes drastic changes in the microstructures and properties of the snow, which can lead to wet snow avalanches <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> or the release of large amounts of water and flooding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The rapid morphological transformation of the wet snow microstructure is called wet snow metamorphism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> and is characterized by the formation of large, rounded, often clustered grains, referred to as melt forms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.4"/>.  Liquid water transport in snow is a complex phenomenon that involves water flow by gravity and capillarity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. It can present features such as preferential flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, capillary rise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.7"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, capillary barriers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, or hysteretic wetting-drying processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Liquid water transport is coupled with heat and water vapor transport, driven by heat conduction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, heat convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.11"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, latent heat and vapor fluxes from phase changes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.12"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, and vapor diffusion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.13"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.  Several models have been proposed to simulate wet snow and water transport in the snowpack, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.14"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, including large-scale operational models such as Crocus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.15"/> and Snowpack <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx83" id="paren.16"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e240">The movement of water is classically described by the Richards equation, which expresses the volumetric liquid water content evolution in unsaturated porous media <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.17"/>:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M3" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (–) the volumetric water content, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the liquid pressure head (linearly related to the capillary pressure), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) a source/sink term, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the vertical direction pointing upwards.  To solve this equation, the liquid pressure head and the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity need to be specified.  In general porous media applications, the water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is expressed as a function of the liquid pressure head <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> through the water retention curve (WRC). The WRC describes the evolution of capillary pressure in pores as a function of water content, which reflects the hydraulic behavior of the porous medium. This relationship can be obtained for primary imbibition, which corresponds to the wetting of a dry porous medium by a liquid until it reaches saturation, for primary drainage, which corresponds to the drainage of a fully saturated porous medium, and for drainage or imbibition of a porous medium at any intermediate state of saturation.</p>
      <p id="d2e422">WRCs are traditionally derived based on laboratory experiments, in which the liquid pressure head in the porous material under study is measured during a drainage or imbibition experiment, at different water contents.  For snow, some WRC measurements are available <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.18"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. They, however, show different limitations.  In these studies, the liquid pressure head was typically measured with a coarse vertical resolution on the order of centimeters, except for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.19"/>, who provide measurements at a spatial resolution of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the magnetic resonance imaging method (MRI), and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.20"/>, who provide measurements at 92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using neutron radiography.  Another limitation concerns the snow samples under study, which, in the majority, were dense melt forms. The measurements of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.21"/> are the most extensive, based on 60 snow samples, yet restricted to sieved or natural melt forms and natural rounded grains, with high density values from 360 to 630 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and grain sizes from 0.3 to 5.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  These results highlight the need to extend our knowledge on the impact of snow microstructure on the WRCs to a broader range of snow types.  Finally, most of the WRC measurements were performed for drainage; only <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.22"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.23"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.24"/> provided experimental WRCs for imbibition.</p>
      <p id="d2e492">Besides direct measurements, WRCs can be described using the widely-used van Genuchten (VG) model, initially developed for soils <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.25"/>. The VG model reads:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M18" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e594">The term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the effective water saturation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.26"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the residual water content after drainage and the maximum water content reached during imbibition, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the adjusted parameters of the VG model that determine the shape of the WRC.  These shape parameters depend on the material's morphology and need to be specified.  For that, regressions to estimate the shape parameters from microstructural properties were developed by fitting the VG model to WRCs obtained experimentally. For snow, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.27"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.28"/> proposed regressions based on snow grain size, developed from a few drainage experiments on similar snow samples composed of dense melt forms.  Later, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.29"/> presented improved regressions based on both snow density and grain size, using additional drainage experiments, but based on the WRCs of the snow samples made of sieved melt forms only, thus limiting the validation of the regressions to coarse-grained, high-density snow. To date, no regression of the shape parameters of the VG model has been presented specifically for imbibition in snow.</p>
      <p id="d2e688">The water unsaturated hydraulic conductivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the second unknown of the Richards equation (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), can be expressed as a function of the liquid water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the saturated hydraulic conductivity of snow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which depends on the intrinsic permeability of snow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), on the water viscosity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), on the water density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and on the gravitational acceleration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  The intrinsic permeability of snow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depends solely on the microstructure of dry snow and can be estimated from empirical parameterizations, such as the one of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.30"/> based on measurements or the one of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.31"/> based on numerical computations on 3D tomographic images of snow.  The term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the relative water permeability at a given saturation, and is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the unsaturated water permeability. The unsaturated water permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or equivalently the relative water permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are classically modeled using the van Genuchten–Mualem (VGM) equation for unsaturated soils, which relates the permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the liquid water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.32"/>.  The VGM equation is written as:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M46" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where the shape parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the same as those defined in the VG model (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). The exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the effects of the connectivity and tortuosity of the flow paths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.33"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The estimation of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of snow is affected by the same limitations as those described for the estimation of the WRCs of snow.</p>
      <p id="d2e1212">The processes of heat transport and water vapor transport in wet snow are driven by the unsaturated effective thermal conductivity of snow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the unsaturated effective water vapor diffusivity of snow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which have been little studied.  These properties were investigated for dry snow, in particular using X-ray tomography, which provides the 3D distribution of the ice and air structure at the pore scale, thus enabling accurate computations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.34"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  The modeling of heat and vapor transport in dry snow could thus be improved in macro-scale models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.35"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.  These advances are, however, limited to dry snow.  Performing X-ray tomography on wet snow samples is still a challenge, notably due to the lack of contrast between the X-ray absorption of ice and liquid water. The literature studies generally propose refrozen states of wet snow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.36"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> which do not allow a precise imaging of the ice-water interface. Direct 3D imaging of wet snow is presently only achieved by MRI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx88" id="paren.37"/>, with mm-scale images, whereas observing pore-scale processes requires a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-scale resolution. Due to these limitations, wet snow models rely on simple approaches to estimate the effective properties of wet snow.  In many models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.38"/>, the unsaturated thermal conductivity of snow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is derived based on an arithmetic mean, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the effective thermal conductivity of dry snow and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the intrinsic thermal conductivity of liquid water. In doing so, the impact of the microstructure and phase connectivity is not fully considered, although their importance was shown in dry snow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.39"/>. In the operational Crocus model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.40"/>, the parameterization of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="text.41"/>, which is only valid for dry snow, is extrapolated to wet snow, leading to the assumption that ice and water have the same impact on the snow effective thermal conductivity, although ice conducts four times more than water.  Finally, the unsaturated effective water vapor diffusivity of snow has not yet been studied, as water vapor transport by diffusion has not yet been implemented in wet snow models. For unsaturated soils, different parameterizations are used depending on the soil nature, such as the ones of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.42"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.43"/>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.44"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1400">Different methods are currently used to compute the WRCs within porous media from 3D images of their microstructure. The first approach consists in performing two-phase flow simulations at the pore scale using different numerical methods, such as the lattice-Boltzmann method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.45"/>, the volume of fluids method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.46"/>, or the phase-field modeling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.47"/>. These simulations accurately describe the dynamics of the physical processes at the pore-scale, but they require substantial computational resources when applied to complex 3D microstructures. To overcome this drawback, other methods such as the Pore Network Model (PNM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.48"/> or the Pore Morphology Method (PMM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx71" id="paren.49"/> can be used. The PNM consists of creating a virtual representation of the porous medium, consisting of pore bodies (nodes) and pore throats (edges) of different sizes connected to each other. It is then possible to simulate the fluid flow and other transport processes of interest at the meso-scale through this network, with the relevant 1D physics implemented between nodes. The construction of such a model requires the extraction of microstructural parameters from the 3D images, such as pore sizes, throat sizes, coordination number, or shape factor, which is not always straightforward and impacts the accuracy of the modeling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.50"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references herein</named-content></xref>. In the quasi-static regime, the Pore Morphology Method (PMM) can be used to compute, from a 3D image, the fluid phase distribution through a series of image-processing operations without solving any partial differential equation. The obtained 3D images, corresponding to different water content values in the porous medium, can then be used to compute the effective properties such as permeability, thermal conductivity, or effective diffusivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.51"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1429">In the present paper, the Pore Morphology Method (PMM) is used to compute the WRCs during imbibition and drainage of snow. The ice structure is fixed, i.e., the wet snow metamorphism is not represented. The PMM is applied to 34 experimental 3D tomography images of dry snow, presenting a wide range of snow microstructures, in terms of density, grain size, and shape. A series of 3D images is obtained, showing distributions of air, ice, and liquid water in snow at different stages of drainage or imbibition, so for different liquid water contents. The first part of this work is dedicated to the study of the WRCs, which are directly obtained from the simulations.  The impact of the snow microstructure on the WRC shape is analyzed. The simulated WRCs are compared to experimental WRCs from the literature, including a comparison of the adjusted parameters of the VG model. New regressions of these parameters are proposed for both imbibition and drainage and compared to existing ones.  In the second part, the series of 3D snow images at different stages of drainage or imbibition are used to compute the effective properties required for the modeling of water flow, heat, and vapor transport in wet snow. The studied properties are the relative permeability (i.e. the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity), the effective thermal conductivity, and the effective water vapor diffusivity. The numerical results are compared with commonly used estimates from the literature, such as the VGM model for the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. New regressions of effective thermal conductivity and vapor diffusivity are presented to account for the level of water saturation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Definition of the micro-scale variables</title>
      <p id="d2e1447">Within the representative elementary volume (REV) of snow noted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we define <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the volumes occupied by the ice, the water, and the air phase, respectively, as illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>. The volume fractions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the different phases (ice, water, air) are written:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M65" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The porosity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the water saturation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and air saturation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are, respectively defined as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which leads to:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M71" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>and</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1851">Illustration of the micro-scale air (white), ice (light blue), and liquid water (dark blue) phases in wet snow. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the volume of air, ice, and liquid water, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>3D images of snow and microstructural properties</title>
      <p id="d2e1901">The set of 3D images of snow used in this study for the simulations corresponds to the one from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.52"/> (see the related Supplement for details). This set consists of 34 images of different dry snow microstructures obtained by X-ray micro-tomography, covering a wide range of snow properties in terms of density, grain size, and snow type. The imaged snow samples are composed of natural snow collected in the field as well as snow obtained from evolution under controlled environmental conditions in cold laboratory, which replicates natural snow evolution. The image volumes are cubic, with sides ranging in size from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and resolution from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Of these 34 images, 5 images representative of the diversity of all the images were selected for detailed investigations. They include two images of melt forms at different densities and grain sizes, and one image of depth hoar, rounded grains, and precipitation particles. Their main characteristics are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>. To characterize these dry snow microstructures, we rely on the snow density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in the following the snow density will always refer to the dry density without liquid water), which is computed from the snow porosity as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the ice density taken as 917 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the spherical equivalent radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>es</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, derived from the specific surface area (SSA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>es</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the ice density. Snow density and SSA values were provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.53"/> (see the related Supplement for the detailed table) based on 3D image computations using simple voxel counting and a stereological method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.54"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2112">Main characteristics of the 5 selected 3D images. The image size is the side length of the cubic image. Snow types are given according to the international classification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.55"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Snow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Image size</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>es</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(voxel)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">651</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">503</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">473</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">grad3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">600</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">369</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">315</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1192</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">125</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Numerical simulations of imbibition and drainage</title>
      <p id="d2e2352">The SatuDict module of the Geodict software (Math2Market GmbH) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.56"/> based on the Pore Morphology Method (PMM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.57"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> was used to compute water retention curves (WRCs) of snow. This method, valid in a quasi-static regime, is applicable when the gravity and viscous forces are negligible compared to capillary forces, which is the case in snow. Indeed, at the pore scale, capillary forces usually play a much more important role than gravity. For air and water, the Bond number, which measures the ratio between gravitational force and surface tension force, is defined as: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Bo</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the water and the air density, respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gravity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the surface tension, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a characteristic length of the snow microstructure at the pore scale, such as the pore size. This dimensionless number varies between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a pore size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> varying between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as in snow. These estimations show that gravitational forces are negligible at the pore scale in comparison to capillary forces. Similarly, it can be shown <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.58"/> that within a porous medium for small Reynolds numbers and capillary numbers, the viscous stress (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the pore scale is negligible in comparison to the fluid pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The latter is of the order of the capillary pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a macroscopic length, i.e. the characteristic size of the snowpack. If we assume that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−3</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the capillary pressure is around 100 times larger than the viscous stress.</p>
      <p id="d2e2645">The PMM uses a sphere with a radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a probe to detect the pore space that is accessible by the non-wetting phase (NWP, here the air). This radius is computed from the Young–Laplace equation: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cos</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the capillary pressure, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface tension, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the contact angle between ice and liquid water. At 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0756 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12° <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.59"/>. Morphological operations, namely, erosion and/or dilation, are used in the PMM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.60"/>. The algorithm of the PMM can be decomposed into several steps as follows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.61"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g. Fig. 2 in</named-content></xref>: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2779">In drainage conditions, the porous medium is initially saturated with the wetting phase (WP, here the water) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0. The invading NWP is connected to the inlet, which is the NWP reservoir, and the WP can escape through the outlet, the WP reservoir. (i) Then, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is increased incrementally, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is decreased incrementally. The solid phase is first dilated by a sphere with radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. (ii) All the pores connected to the NWP reservoir are labeled as NWP. (iii) The NWP is then dilated with the same sphere with radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The remaining pores are filled with the WP. The saturation can then be calculated. (iv) All the pores filled by the WP disconnected from the WP reservoir are considered as WP residual, and are no longer considered in the next steps. All these steps (i to iv) are repeated by increasing the value of the pressure, i.e. by decreasing the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the present case, the radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was decreased gradually with a step of 2 pixel size.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2848">In imbibition conditions, the porous medium is initially saturated with the NWP. The invading WP is connected to the inlet, which is the WP reservoir, and the NWP can escape the NWP reservoir through the outlet. (i) Then, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is decreased incrementally, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is increased incrementally. The solid phase is first dilated by a sphere with radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. (ii) The NWP is then dilated with the same sphere with radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. (iii) All the pores connected to the WP are now labeled as WP. The remaining pores are NWP. The saturation can then be calculated. (iv) All the pores filled by the NWP disconnected from the NWP reservoir are considered as NWP residual, and are no longer considered in the next steps. As for the drainage conditions, all these steps (i to iv) are repeated for the next value of the pressure, i.e. the next value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the present case, the radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was increased gradually with a step of 2 pixel size.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e2898">In imbibition conditions, if the step (iv) is ignored, the PMM also allows to compute the Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure (MICP) curves, which are a commonly-used technique for measurements of porosity or pore throat size distribution, for instance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.62"/>. As underlined in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.63"/>, the accuracy of the PMM may depend on the resolution and size of the 3D images and of the definition of the structural element. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the boundary conditions applied on the four sides of the 3D images that are not connected to the NWP or WP reservoirs may also play a role in the WRC simulations, even if this point has not been discussed in the literature, to the best of our knowledge. In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.64"/>, impervious boundary conditions are applied, whereas other conditions, such as symmetry, displaced fluid outlet, or invading fluid inlet, may also be applied <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.65"/>. These boundary conditions may lead to different values of the NWP (air) residuals during the imbibition process, since these residuals can be trapped or not at the boundaries. Depending on the boundary conditions, the maximum water content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) may range from 45 % to 90 % of the porosity. Despite such large differences, the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Van Genuchten (VG) model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.66"/> remains almost constant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.67"><named-content content-type="post">see also Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/></named-content></xref>. The impact of the boundary conditions is less pronounced in drainage conditions, since the water residuals are mainly located at the junction between closegrains.</p>
      <p id="d2e2958">In the present study, the PMM implemented in the SatudDict software was used to compute the WRCs of the 34 snow samples. We computed (i) a primary imbibition curve assuming that there is no air (NWP) residuals as in MICP experiments, thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), and then (ii) a primary drainage curve until reaching the water (WP) residuals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). In both cases, symmetric boundary conditions were applied on the four sides of the volumes. The series of 3D snow images at different stages of drainage were then used to compute the relative permeability (i.e. the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity), the effective thermal conductivity, and the effective water vapor diffusivity.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2998">Example of a water retention curve estimated from a drainage simulation on the 3D tomographic snow sample NH5 (MF). The simulated 3D water distribution in the pores is shown at 3 different stages.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3009">WRCs from the VG model: influence of <bold>(a)</bold> the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5) and of <bold>(b)</bold> the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Water retention curve analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e3105">Results from the SatuDict software are used to determine the WRC, by expressing the liquid pressure head <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the liquid water volume fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for both imbibition and drainage. An example of the WRC obtained from a drainage simulation on a small MF sample is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>. The plot should be read from right to left, as water is gradually drained out of the porous microstructure. The liquid pressure head increases with decreasing water content, characterized by a sharp rise at the very beginning and very end of drainage and a near constant value for the intermediate water contents. The 3D images show the distribution of the air (transparent) and water (dark blue) in the pore space of the snow at different points on the WRC. WRCs also provide the residual water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, being the remaining water content after drainage, and the saturated water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, being the maximum amount of water the snow volume can store. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since no air residuals are simulated. Both parameters are illustrated in the figure as the endpoints of the WRC.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3174"><bold>(a)</bold> Influence of the volume size taken for drainage simulations on the WRC, for the sample NH5 of melt forms. Simulation data are represented by symbols and the fitted VG models by solid lines. <bold>(b)</bold> Example of hysteresis of the WRC between imbibition and drainage, for the snow sample NH5.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3188">To further analyze the WRCs estimated from the different snow images, the curves are fitted to the van Genuchten (VG) model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.68"/> described in the introduction and by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). This model relies on the shape parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which determine the shape of the WRC and need to be specified. The parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is usually approximated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.69"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The influence of the parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the WRC is illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> controls the steepness of the curve inflections while the inverse of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is related to the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at which inflections occur. Roughly, the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be related to the average pore size and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the width of the pore size distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.70"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In what follows, the WRCs of each imbibition and drainage simulation are considered and used to fit the VG model. For fitting, we took <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both imbibition and drainage, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for imbibition, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equals the minimum value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained from the drainage simulations for drainage. These choices are justified by the fact that our simulations start with a primary imbibition, without any liquid water in the pores, and that we do not simulate entrapped air in imbibition but residual water in drainage.</p>
      <p id="d2e3413">Finally, we evaluated the REV of the WRC on our 3D images, by performing imbibition and drainage simulations from several sub-volumes of increasing sizes within the same sample, as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.71"/>. The size of the REV was assumed to be reached once values of the WRC did not vary significantly when the size of the sub-volumes of computation increased. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a shows an example for the sample NH5 (MF), which is the most critical sample because of its large grains. We see that the REV needed to obtain representative distributions of the fluids in the pores and representative WRCs is rather large compared to the typical REV of thermal conductivity, density, or SSA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.72"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The maximum sizes available for all the 3D images were then used, giving satisfactory results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Computation of the effective transport properties of wet snow</title>
      <p id="d2e3435">Next, we study the effective transport properties of wet snow based on the 3D image series obtained from the drainage simulations. We focus on the properties involved in the processes of heat, water vapor and liquid water transport, namely the water unsaturated hydraulic conductivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (linked to the relative water permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the unsaturated effective thermal conductivity of snow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the unsaturated effective water vapor diffusivity of snow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  To access <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Geodict software was used to compute the 3D tensors of these three transport properties of wet snow: the intrinsic water permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the effective thermal conductivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the effective water vapor diffusivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Computations were performed on the series of 3D images of wet snow obtained from the imbibition and drainage simulations, so for different water contents, snow densities, and microstructures. For each property, a specific boundary value problem, resulting from a homogenization technique, is solved on the REV, applying periodic boundary conditions on the external boundaries of each volume. The equations to be solved are provided in the Supplement and correspond to Eqs. (S1)–(S4) for the intrinsic water permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eqs. (S5)–(S15) for the effective thermal conductivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Eqs. (S16)–(S20) for the effective vapor diffusivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Computations of the thermal conductivity were carried out using the thermal properties of ice, air and liquid water at 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.024 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.556 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As the non-diagonal terms of the tensors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are negligible, we consider only the diagonal terms, which are seen as the eigenvalues of the tensors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.73"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In the following, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refer to the average of the diagonal terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3962">Vertical cross-sections of the 5 selected snow samples with drainage and imbibition processes at 3 stages of effective saturation. The cross-sections are taken in the center of the samples. The reservoir of the wetting phase is located on the bottom boundary and the reservoir of the non-wetting phase is located on the top boundary.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3973">Numerical imbibition <bold>(a)</bold> and drainage <bold>(b)</bold> WRCs for different types of snow samples with the corresponding VG fits. The curve colors represent the different snow types. The MAEs on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the fits are expressed in percent.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e4003">Regressions of the shape parameters of the VG model <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.74"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx87" id="text.75"/>, and from this work for both imbibition and drainage. For the derived regressions, standard deviations are given for each coefficient.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (–)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.76"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.77"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.78"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.61</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">This work, imbibition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">This work, drainage</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.029 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003 for MF samples</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.046 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006 for the other snow types</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Water retention curves</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>WRCs of different snow microstructures and their related VG fits</title>
      <p id="d2e4539">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> presents vertical cross-sections of the drainage and imbibition simulations at three stages of water saturation for the five selected snow samples described in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>. The pore-scale distribution of liquid water in the microstructures can be observed. For imbibition, the small pores are first filled, and the larger pores are filled last. For drainage, it is the other way around, with water escaping the large pore first. Residual liquid water at the end of the drainage simulation is shown in pink. Air bubbles entrapped in the ice skeleton are shown in yellow (for instance, in the bottom right of the 0A (RG) sample). This figure also highlights the fact that, for a given saturation, the liquid water distribution is different depending on the snow types, as well as between the imbibition and drainage processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e4546">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a and b present the WRCs of the imbibition and drainage simulations applied to the 5 selected snow samples presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>. A first result is that the WRCs of the snow samples present generally significant hysteresis, as they differ between imbibition and drainage (see also Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b). Overall, a steeper WRC is found for imbibition compared to drainage, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are higher for drainage compared to imbibition.</p>
      <p id="d2e4562">The influence of the snow geometrical properties can be observed. Snow samples presenting small grains (0.06–0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), such as the samples fr (PP), 0A (RG), and grad3 (DH), show higher pore pressures at a given water content than the samples NH2 (MF) and NH5 (MF) presenting coarse grains (0.53–0.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Snow density also has a direct influence on the WRCs, as it limits the maximum water content that can be reached.  More subtly, the WRCs tend to show sharper transitions for the most evolved snow microstructures.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e4584"><bold>(a, b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c, d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameters of the VG model as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for imbibition and drainage. The regressions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.79"/> are shown by black lines, the values used to derive those regressions are shown by black disks (“S-samples”, composed of refrozen MF – see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="altparen.80"/>). The additional drainage measurements from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.81"/> are shown by circles (MF samples) and stars (RG samples). Measurements from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.82"/> are shown by empty gray markers. Measurements from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.83"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.84"/> are shown by empty orange triangles and blue circles. From this work, parameters from imbibition and drainage simulations are shown by colored disks and triangles, respectively, the colors showing the snow types. The proposed regressions based on our simulated data are shown by dashed and dotted lines (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e4677">For each microstructure, we also present the related VG fit (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) that best reproduces the simulated WRC. In other words, the VG parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were optimized to best fit the simulated WRC of each snow sample for imbibition and for drainage. The fitting is rated in terms of MAE (mean absolute error) on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and expressed as a percentage. The fitted WRCs show overall good agreement with the simulated WRCs, as illustrated for the five selected snow samples in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a and b. The fits show slightly better results for drainage than for imbibition, and for MF samples compared to the other snow types. The model fits the data points better in the wet part compared to the dry part for snow types such as RG and PP. This might be due to (i) the fact that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> constrains the shape of the fit, and that (ii) the data points are not evenly distributed in this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as the simulation step is the pore radius and not the water content. In future studies, the VG formulation could be refined using more parameters, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to enable fitting both the left and right inflection points of the WRCs, especially for drainage.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Analysis of the VG parameters</title>
      <p id="d2e4787">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> presents the VG parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained by fitting the VG model to our simulated WRCs for all our dataset. The parameters, obtained for imbibition and drainage, are expressed as a function of the term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.85"/>, and compared to the regressions suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.86"/> (black solid curves in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>). In addition, the measurement data of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx1" id="text.87"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.88"/> are also shown. They correspond to values derived from WRCs obtained from laboratory experiments of imbibition and drainage.  As specified in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>, in all our computations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated based on the SSA, following the formula <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>es</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  917 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the ice density.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter</title>
      <p id="d2e4985">Overall, the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, so when density increases and/or grain size decreases. This trend is in overall consistent with the measurements of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.89"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.90"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.91"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.92"/>. Moreover, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from the imbibition simulations are systematically larger than the ones from the drainage simulations. This is in agreement with the hysteresis reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.93"/> and with the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values obtained from imbibition experiments by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.94"/>.  The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from our simulations and the regression of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.95"/> are overall in good agreement for drainage, with a MAE of 25 %, a little less so for imbibition, with a MAE of 38 %.</p>
      <p id="d2e5067">Following the formulation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.96"/>, we proposed two new regressions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which allow reproducing the different behaviors between imbibition and drainage. Their expressions are provided in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. They are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a and b, and have a MAE of 17 % when compared to our data. The proposed regressions were derived from snow samples with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values comprised between 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>6</sup> and 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>6</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and do not cover the lowest values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>6</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), for which a steep evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was reported <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.97"/>. Still, we derived our regressions with an exponential form to be consistent with these observations and following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.98"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5221">We use the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter to quantify the degree of hysteresis of the WRCs, based on the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from imbibition over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from drainage.  For our set of images, this ratio ranges from 1.19 to 1.42, with an average value of 1.28. It is consistent with the ratios measured by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.99"/>, for which values of 1.46, 1.52, and 1.38 are found for the S, M, and L samples, respectively. No correlation was found between this ratio and grain type, grain size, or density. Our ratios and the ones of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.100"/> tend to confirm hysteresis ratios around 1.5 for snow, which is lower than the classical value of 2 used for soils <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.101"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter</title>
      <p id="d2e5285">The results obtained from the simulations are more surprising regarding the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For imbibition, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values show little variation for the whole range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and are around 4.7 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>d). These results are rather consistent with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.102"/> but not with those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.103"/>. The latter authors report a correlation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that follows the regression of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.104"/> based on drainage experiments, not observed in our work and the one of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.105"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5371">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for drainage are overall much higher compared to imbibition, as opposed to the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.106"/> for snow or many soils observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.107"/>, which mention similar values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for drainage and imbibition. Our results are more consistent with the ones of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.108"/> for snow or with granular materials <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.109"/> for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in imbibition can be much smaller than the ones in drainage.</p>
      <p id="d2e5420">For drainage, our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are spread and show little correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Looking at the experimental data, a large spread is also observed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.110"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.111"/>, and for the rounded grains samples of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.112"/>. Our estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values overall do not follow the regression of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.113"/>, although the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the melt forms samples are closer to this regression compared to the other snow types. Let us recall that <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.114"/> presented a regression based on drainage experiments on sieved melt forms only (black filled dots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>d), which was in good agreement with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values estimated on other samples of natural melt forms (black circles), but in poor agreement for samples of natural rounded grains (black stars), for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appear to be independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.115"/> attributed these different behaviors between snow samples to differences in pore-size uniformity, which seems coherent with the definition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5535">To test the hypothesis that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could depend on the pore-size uniformity, we characterized pore size variations by using the distributions of mean curvature of the snow microstructure, which is a standard parameter used for snow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.116"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. see</named-content></xref>. The mean curvature was calculated at each point on the surface of the 3D images and represented as a statistical distribution (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx10" id="altparen.117"/>, and the Supplement for additional information). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the interquartile range of the mean curvature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of each 3D snow image for both imbibition and drainage, thus describing the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the mean curvature uniformity for both processes.  A trend can be observed, so that low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values tend to be correlated to large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, following the form of an inverse function.  The trend is overall similar for imbibition and drainage, with lower values for imbibition.  The observed trend is consistent with the fact that, during drainage, water leaves the pores more or less all at once for snow with rather uniform pore sizes, such as melt forms (in red), as showed by very sharp WRCs and modeled by large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b). The lower limit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a material with uniform pore sizes and higher values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (step function). For snow types showing large pore size variability, such as fresh snow (in light green), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are smaller, and the resulting WRC shows a smoother transition as a function of the water content, i.e., the drainage is more gradual.  The same considerations apply to imbibition, while the impact is less prominent, due to the rather large snow porosity (at least greater than 0.4 for each sample of our dataset). The imbibition is thus less dependent on the local microstructure than the drainage process.</p>
      <p id="d2e5663">In conclusion, to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, our results do not support the use of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio but rather of more refined parameters, such as the mean curvature distribution (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> for the detailed regression proposed).  This can be seen as a limitation for larger-scale modeling as this parameter can currently only be derived from 3D images.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter</title>
      <p id="d2e5713">The last parameter required for our use of the VG model is the residual water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As already mentioned, this parameter was set to 0 for imbibition as simulations were performed on fully dry snow images, and was only determined for drainage as the minimum value of water content reached during the drainage simulations.  Two distinct groups are observed (Fig <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>e). Samples with density below 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show values centered around 0.046, which slightly increase with density from about 0.036 to 0.061. Samples of melt forms with density above 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show smaller values around 0.029, including the NH2 and NH5 samples.  This division is probably due to the fact that the denser snow samples are composed of MF that show large and uniform pores compared to the other samples. The latter could be subjected to more disconnections during drainage due to the small and complex throats, resulting in higher residual water content.  All the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from our simulations are larger than the value of 0.02 proposed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.118"/>. Following our results, we propose to approximate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by two constant values depending on the snow type: 0.029 for melt forms and 0.046 for the other snow types (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter</title>
      <p id="d2e5818">To complete the picture, it seems worth discussing the saturated water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This parameter is here approximated by the snow porosity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as opposed to observations from the snow imbibition and drainage experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.119"/> which report <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the experimental challenge of filling complex geometries with melt and freezing processes occurring during the imbibition. In porous media such as soils and sands, imbibition and drainage experiments also show a large range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Low values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are either seen as underestimated due to the experimental limits linked to the challenge of filling complex geometries, or as reflecting the real physical processes at stake <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.120"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Therefore, two approaches are commonly used in the literature, either the approximation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is adjusted to experimental data.  The experiments of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.121"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.122"/> have shown that having <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> generally implies greater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, but has no significant impact on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. For snow purposes, the actual values of the saturated water content still remain unclear and should be further investigated to refine the VG parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx5" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Conclusion on the VG parameters</title>
      <p id="d2e5999">The regressions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.123"/> are in good agreement with our simulations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially for drainage, but not for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both imbibition and drainage, and not for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We recall that the regressions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.124"/> are based on drainage experiments only and realized on a limited number of snow types, mainly composed of dense MF, which may explain some of the observed discrepancies. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we proposed new regressions based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both imbibition and drainage, for a wide range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a constant value was suggested for imbibition, but no estimates for drainage could be proposed using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A parameter that captures the pore size distribution of snow, such as the interquartile range of the mean curvature, seems to be required. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, two mean values were provided depending on the snow type for drainage.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e6117"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter as a function of the interquartile range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained for the mean curvature distribution computed on each 3D dry snow image. Regressions for imbibition <bold>(a)</bold> and drainage <bold>(b)</bold> are shown with dotted and dashed lines (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e6157">Illustration of the VG shape parameters regressions on the WRCs for 2 representative samples as a function of the effective saturation. The presented VG models are: imbibition and drainage models from this work and the models of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.125"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.126"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.127"/> (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Application of the different VG models on two representative snow samples</title>
      <p id="d2e6185">Here, we applied different VG models to predict the WRCs for drainage and imbibition for two imaginary snow samples. The properties of those samples have been chosen to be representative of melt forms (sample 1: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and precipitation particles (sample 2: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We present predictions based on the regressions of the shape parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.128"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.129"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.130"/>, and from this study for both imbibition and drainage. These regressions of the shape parameters are provided in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.131"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.132"/> present a regression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on grain size, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.133"/> include both grain size and snow density, using the variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the mean grain diameter. We recall that the latter three regressions have been developed based on drainage measurements only.</p>
      <p id="d2e6459">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/> presents the WRCs for the two representative samples for the different VG models. These curves are expressed as a function of the effective saturation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.134"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, defined in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>).  Our VG models are closer to the VG model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.135"/> for both samples, the one of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.136"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.137"/> being consistently above and below our estimates, respectively.  Besides, the difference of WRCs estimated for imbibition and drainage on the same sample is lower than the difference between models.  A larger spread of the curves can be observed for sample 2, which tends to show the highest sensitivity of the VG shape parameters for low-density and small-grain snow.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Effective wet snow transport properties</title>
      <p id="d2e6490">Unsaturated effective properties were computed on the simulated 3D images of wet snow obtained for different stages of the drainage simulations. We present here the results for the effective water permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the effective thermal conductivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the effective water vapor diffusivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>).</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e6532">Effective relative water permeability as a function of the effective saturation for <bold>(a)</bold> all the snow samples, and  <bold>(b)</bold> the 5 reference samples. Computations were performed on the snow images from the drainage simulations only. The dry density of the snow samples is represented by the colorbar. The VGM models of relative permeability using the shape parameters fitted on the WRC of each image (provided in the Supplement) are shown by the solid lines.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e6549">Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the effective saturation for <bold>(a)</bold> the whole set of snow samples, and <bold>(b)</bold> the 5 selected samples. Computations were performed on the snow images from the drainage simulations only. The dry density of the snow samples is represented by the colorbar. The VGM model, using the values of intrinsic permeability from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.138"/> and the shape parameters from the regressions of this work given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>, is shown for each sample by solid lines. The VGM model, using the values of intrinsic permeability from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.139"/> and the regression from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.140"/> is shown with the dashed lines.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Water permeability and hydraulic conductivity</title>
      <p id="d2e6597">First, we study the effective water permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To compare all the samples together, we use the relative water permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the intrinsic permeability of the saturated media. The evolution of the relative permeability with the effective saturation is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a. The relationship describes an exponential increase, which tends, for all samples, to merge into a single curve. This shows that the water permeability is at first order driven by the water content and the snow density, and that other dependencies with other microstructural parameters are, if any, of lesser strength. We compare our results with the van Genuchten–Mualem (VGM) model of relative water permeability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.141"/>, described in the introduction and in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>). For that, the shape factors of the VG model <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were taken using the values fitted to the WRC of each image. In addition, the VGM model includes the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which describes the effects of the connectivity and tortuosity of the flow paths. Here we assume that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the default value suggested in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.142"/>. Note that this parameter can vary depending on the porous material <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.143"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and its value for snow could be refined in future works.  For the 5 reference snow samples presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>, good agreements are found between the VGM model and our numerical computations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>b).</p>

      <fig id="F12" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d2e6765">Unsaturated thermal conductivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the effective saturation for <bold>(a)</bold> the whole set of snow samples, and <bold>(b)</bold> the 5 selected samples. Computations were performed on the snow images from the drainage simulations only. The dry density of the snow samples is represented by the colorbar. The suggested regression is shown by solid lines and the self-consistent estimate for 3 phases is shown by dashed lines.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e6791">From the relative water permeability, the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be obtained by the following equation:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M385" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            with

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M386" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on the snow microstructure and is estimated using the parameterization of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.144"/> based on the density and the spherical equivalent radius of snow. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/> presents the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the effective saturation, showing a non-linear increase with increasing saturation.  As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contains a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor as compared to the relative permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, an effect of the microstructure can here be observed: for a given water saturation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies with density and the spherical equivalent radius, such as lighter and/or larger grain snow samples show larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Fig <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a and b).  To estimate the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, the VGM model is here used with the shape parameters estimated from the regressions proposed in this study for drainage (given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>), and combined with the parameterization of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.145"/>. The estimates are overall in good agreement with the computed data, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>b. The estimates of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from the VGM model using the shape parameters from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.146"/> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>) are also provided for comparison (dashed lines).  Both VGM models are overall fairly close. For the melt forms samples, a slight improvement is found using our regressions, with MAE values around 10 % for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.147"/> and around 9 % for our model. These similarities can be related to the fact that, on one hand, the regression of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.148"/> provides slightly better estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for this snow type, compared to our regression (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b); on the other hand, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are better estimates from our regression (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>d and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>).  For the other snow types, the VGM model using our shape parameter estimates provides better predictions of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, showing MAE values around 15 % compared to the VGM model using the estimates of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.149"/>, with MAEs around 22 %. Indeed, for all the snow types excluding melt forms, both shape parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are overall better estimated using our regression (as optimized to best match our numerical simulations). This highlights the advantage of considering a large diversity of snow to develop the regressions of the shape parameter, so that the regressions can be applied more widely.  However, we point out that the VGM model based on the shape parameter estimates of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.150"/>, which only required the knowledge of density and grain size, still allows for fair estimates of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, with MAEs ranging from 10 % to 20 %, when compared to the simulations on our five samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Thermal conductivity</title>
      <p id="d2e7059">The unsaturated effective thermal conductivity of wet snow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which accounts for heat conduction in the ice, air, and liquid water, is presented for different saturation levels in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>. As expected, thermal conductivity increases with increasing saturation, as liquid water conducts better than air. Values of thermal conductivity of fully saturated snow are increased by about 0.5 to 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the ones of dry snow, which means multiplying by 6 the thermal conductivity of a fresh snow sample or by 2 that of a melt form sample. The major impact of snow density is also shown, as already reported for dry snow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.151"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Density also influences the steepness of the linear conductivity-saturation relationship, such as dense snow shows less steep slopes than light snow. Indeed, the pore space available for a conductivity gain due to an increase in water content is smaller for denser snow.  To represent the evolution of thermal conductivity with both density and liquid water content, we propose the following regression based on our data:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M400" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>10</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Calonne</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>11</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext mathvariant="normal">with </mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Calonne</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Calonne</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the parameterization of thermal conductivity for dry snow of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.152"/> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dry snow density.  The choice of the regression form was motivated by a concern for simplicity and to respect the two extreme cases: a volume fully made of liquid water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1) and a volume fully made of air (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0). The case of a volume fully made of ice is not considered, as the regression of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.153"/> is only valid for densities corresponding to snow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>a and b, the proposed regression reproduces well the computed data. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>, the self-consistent (SC) estimate of thermal conductivity for a 3-phase composite aggregate of spherical inclusions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.154"/> is included for comparison. This analytical model is derived by solving the polynomial expression

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M415" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the volume fraction and thermal conductivity of the phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The SC model prediction is consistent with the numerical values computed on the 3D images.</p>
      <p id="d2e7522">For several models of the literature, the thermal conductivity of snow as a function of the water content is needed, including snowpack models, such as the Crocus model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.155"/>, or detailed models of wet snow processes, such as the one of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.156"/>. They often rely on simple approximations to include the effect of water on the effective snow thermal conductivity. In the current version of Crocus, the thermal conductivity estimate from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="text.157"/> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Yen1981</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, developed for dry snow, is applied to wet snow by simply accounting for the volume fraction of both ice and liquid water, as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M420" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Crocus</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Yen1981</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.88</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e7646">The model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.158"/> relies on a weighted average of the thermal conductivity of water and of dry snow, such as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M421" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Leroux2017</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Calonne</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e7724">To evaluate these two approaches, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/> presents a comparison with our data from computations and our proposed regression, for 3 snow samples. Major differences between the estimates are observed for each sample. The approximation used in Crocus largely overestimates the thermal conductivity of wet snow, up to a factor of 3 for the case of light snow at full saturation. The formulation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.159"/> leads overall to large underestimations compared to our data. This comparison shows that the water distribution in the pore space plays an important role in the thermal conductivity of wet snow and that considering the bulk water content only is not sufficient. This motivates further studies to improve the modeling of wet snow conductivity and test the regression proposed here.</p>

      <fig id="F13"><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d2e7735">Comparison of the proposed regression of thermal conductivity of dry and wet snow with the regression of Crocus adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="text.160"/> and the one proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.161"/>, for three different snow samples.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Water vapor diffusivity</title>
      <p id="d2e7758">Extending the description of water vapor diffusion of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.162"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.163"/> to the wet snow problem using a similar method as for the heat transport and the liquid water flow of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.164"/>, would involve the effective unsaturated water vapor diffusion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As done for the water permeability, the unsaturated diffusivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is normalized, here by the value of the dry effective vapor diffusivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using the numerical estimate from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.165"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F14" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d2e7805">Relative water vapor diffusivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the liquid water saturation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for drainage simulations of <bold>(a)</bold> the whole set of snow samples and <bold>(b)</bold> the 5 selected samples. The dry density of the snow samples is given by the colorbar. The proposed regression of unsaturated diffusivity is shown by a black solid line, and the models of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.166"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.167"/> are shown with gray dotted and dashed lines, respectively.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f14.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e7853">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F14"/> shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the water saturation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the porosity of dry snow.  Very similar evolutions of the relative unsaturated water vapor diffusivity with the term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown by all the samples, which highlights the strong correlation of the unsaturated diffusivity with both porosity and liquid water content. Diffusivity decreases exponentially as the proportion of liquid water increases, and for a given proportion of liquid water, diffusivity is higher for low-density snow, and inversely. Looking now at the maximum value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached for each sample, we observe that this value varies, as suggested by Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F14"/>b.  The domain of definition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined by the value of water content at which the pore space is obstructed by liquid water, and so when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can no longer be estimated. This specific value of water content is referred to here as the closed pore water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is similar to the close-off density at which the air can no longer diffuse in the pore space, as used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.168"/> for dry snow and firn samples. Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all our snow samples are presented as a function of the dry porosity in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F15"/>. The closed pore water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is significantly smaller than the dry porosity, on average 17 % smaller.  This means that vapor diffusion in wet snow is no longer possible long before saturation is reached. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with increasing porosity (decreasing density), but does not seem specifically impacted by the type of snow considered. A fit, shown in black in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F15"/>, is estimated here as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M439" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <fig id="F15"><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d2e8056">Values of the closed pore water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the snow porosity (circles). The colors represent the snow types. The saturation line <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is represented with a dashed gray line and the proposed fit is shown with a  solid black line.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f15.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e8093">Based on our data, a simple regression is proposed to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the liquid water content and the dry snow porosity:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M443" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="8.535827pt" displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E16"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>16</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E17"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>17</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the self-consistent estimate of effective vapor diffusivity as used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.169"/>. This relationship follows the general form of estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> classically used for soils <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.170"/> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.171"/> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.172"/>.  The regression is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F14"/> by the black line, along with the soil models of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.173"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.174"/> that are displayed with gray dotted and dashed lines. The latter two models fairly represent the behavior of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and bound the regression for snow with higher and lower values. Both are used for predicting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in structureless natural soils.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>3.2.4</label><title>Sum up on the effective properties</title>
      <p id="d2e8515">The analysis of the effective properties based on the images obtained from the drainage simulations showed interesting results.  As already mentioned, it should be kept in mind that many of these images are likely far from natural snow microstructures, as the ice structures remain unchanged in the presence of liquid water in the simulations. Yet, they offer new insights on how the liquid water distribution in snow could influence the effective transport properties for a variety of microstructures. They also enable a comparison between the current parameterizations of the transport properties and suggestions for new estimates. Especially, we showed that the classic VGM parameterization for the relative water permeability and the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity reproduces well our simulated data and seems thus a good choice for both properties.  For the effective unsaturated vapor diffusivity and the effective unsaturated thermal conductivity, we proposed new regressions, which, for the conductivity, differ strongly from some of the current parameterizations used in snow modeling.  Finally, as all the above effective properties were computed on images from drainage simulations only, it could be interesting to compare those estimates to the imbibition case.</p>

      <fig id="F16" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d2e8520">Example of two hysteresis cycles applied to the sample NH2, with primary drainage (1), primary imbibition (2), secondary drainage (3), and secondary imbibition (4). The boundary conditions enable entrapped residual air during imbibition and residual water during drainage. The gray points represent a first imbibition with no entrapped air enabled (MICP). <bold>(a)</bold> Liquid pressure head as a function of the water content. <bold>(b)</bold> Liquid pressure head as a function of the effective saturation. The solid and dashed black lines represent the fitted VG models used in this paper for drainage and imbibition, respectively, as provided in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/2923/2026/tc-20-2923-2026-f16.png"/>

          </fig>


</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Main limitations</title>
      <p id="d2e8549">The proposed study presents different limitations: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e8554">In the present work, the Pore Morphology Method (PMM) has been used. This method is valid in a quasi-static regime, and when capillary forces dominate in comparison to gravity and viscous forces. Dynamic effects that can occur in practice cannot be captured as in two phase flow simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.175"/> or using a Pore Network Model (PNM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.176"/>. Despite such limitations, the PMM provides good estimations of the WRCs for porous media whose wetting phase shows generally spherical menisci, which is the case for snow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.177"/>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e8567">As it has already been underlined, the boundary conditions applied on the four sides of the 3D images not linked to the WP or NWP reservoir may play an important role for the residuals after drainage or imbibition. While little influence was reported for the case of drainage, the amount of residual air (or entrapped air) during imbibition may vary significantly depending on the chosen boundary conditions (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). This point, which concerns all the methods (PMM, etc.) to describe two-phase flows, has been little discussed in the literature, except in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.178"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="text.179"/> in the case of lattice Boltzmann simulations. For our snow samples, preliminary tests showed that the maximum water saturation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranges from 45 % to 90 % of the porosity, depending on the applied boundary conditions (symmetry, wall, or displaced fluid outlet). More generally, knowledge on the residual air in snow seems limited. Estimates based on measurements remain an experimental challenge and show large differences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.180"/>.  Further work would be required to validate the proposed approach through refined comparisons with experimental data, for example, with imbibition experiments that combine measurements of the microstructure by X-ray tomography and measurements of liquid water content by neutron radiography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.181"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.,</named-content></xref>. At this stage, given the uncertainty, the imbibition curve was simulated assuming that there is no air residuals, as in the Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure (MICP) experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.182"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F16"/> presents a comparison of the WRCs with and without taking into account entrapped air during imbibition for the sample NH2. Hysteretic cycles were applied with boundary conditions (displaced fluid outlet) applied on the 4 faces of the volume not linked to the reservoirs, enabling residual air during imbibition and residual water during drainage. For these hysteretic cycles, the sample is initially fully saturated, then the sample is submitted to drainage, imbibition, drainage, and imbibition. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F16"/>a shows the WRCs of each of these steps (Drainage (1), Imbibition (2), Drainage (3), and Imbibition (4)) as a function of the water content, as well as the WRC of imbibition assuming no air residuals (MICP). We can observe that, at the end of Imbibition (1) and (2), the residual air content is about 0.14, so the water saturation does not exceed 70 %. As mentioned, this value can vary depending on the boundary conditions applied to the 4 lateral faces of the volume. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F16"/>b shows the same data as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F16"/>a, but with respect to the effective saturation. The continuous lines represent the fitted VG model proposed in this study, with the shape parameters from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>, so derived from our simulated WRCs of drainage and of imbibition without entrapped air. These two fitted VG models provide a good description of the entire drainage-imbibition process, regardless of whether air residuals are accounted for or not. Indeed, entrapped air has almost no impact on the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a slight impact of around 10 % on the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A similar conclusion was reported in the experiments of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.183"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.184"/> for soils, which showed that having <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> generally implies greater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, but has no significant impact on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e8705">Since the PMM is applied to 3D images, uncertainties can arise from the size and resolution of the images under consideration. The effects of both parameters on the results are available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.185"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.186"/>, and are assumed to be transferable to snow. In the present study, we checked that our snow images correspond to representative elementary volumes. Uncertainties remain regarding the side length of the melt forms images, for which the maximum available sizes were taken, but they still present a limited number of heterogeneities.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e8715">Our simulated WRCs were compared to WRCs measured during experiments of drainage and or imbibition. Such a comparison is not straightforward, as, in the experiments, the snow microstructure can evolve rapidly when in contact with liquid water, whereas, in the simulations, the ice skeleton is fixed and defined by the provided tomography image, always remaining in its initial stage. The comparison simulation-experiment was mainly done through the comparison of the shape parameters of the VG model derived from the WRCs. Experimental estimates remain, however, limited, often focusing either on imbibition or on drainage, or studying only a small range of snow types <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.187"/>. While estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are rather consistent between all the measurements and our simulations for both imbibition and drainage (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a and b), estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differ significantly (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c and d). Hence, it is difficult to conclude on the evaluation of our simulations. Again, dedicated studies would be required to provide further experimental data.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e8748">Finally, the uncertainties of the WRCs simulations are not necessarily transferred to the estimates of the effective transport properties of wet snow. The simulations provide the 3D skeleton of the air, ice, and liquid water, for which the distribution of each phase in space can contain errors, as discussed above. However, only the model of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity required both the volumetric fractions and the 3D distribution of the phases through the shape factors of the WRCs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  In contrast, the estimations of unsaturated thermal conductivity and water vapor diffusivity of snow depend on the volumetric fraction of the phases and not on the shape factors (see Eqs. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E16"/>).</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d2e8786">In this study, a Pore Morphology Model (PMM) was used to simulate the distribution of liquid water in the pore space of snow for various water contents. Liquid water was gradually introduced and then removed by capillarity during wetting (imbibition) and drying (drainage) simulations. This model was applied to a set of 34 3D tomography images of dry snow presenting various microstructures. For each dry snow image, a series of 3D images of wet snow at different stages of imbibition or drainage was produced. Unlike what happens in nature, the ice matrix is fixed and does not evolve with the liquid water in the simulations (no wet snow metamorphism). The simulations were performed with a saturation water content set to the porosity value (no air residuals). This work constitutes an exploratory numerical work to study (i) the water retention curves (WRCs) of snow and (ii) the effective transport properties of wet snow, notably how they are influenced by the water distribution at the pore scale. Both points are critical to better understand and model water flow, heat, and vapor transport in wet snow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.188"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e8794">The WRCs of snow were derived from the simulated wet snow images, for both imbibition and drainage. We confirm the hysteresis of both processes and highlight the dependency of the WRC on the microstructural features of snow, such as the snow density and interfacial mean curvature distribution.  We then reproduced our WRCs with the model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.189"/> and derived new values of the model parameters, which are the shape parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the residual water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the saturated water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being set to the porosity value in our study). Comparing with values from previous experimental studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.190"/>, we point out an overall fair agreement for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but significant differences for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, even between the experimental literature values themselves. Possible causes of these discrepancies are discussed. We propose new parameterizations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for both imbibition and drainage processes, optimized for our simulated WRCs.  They should contribute to a more generalized use of this model to predict the WRCs of snow, as needed for water flow modeling.  Dedicated investigations should, however, be performed to further evaluate those parameterizations, especially concerning the exact values of the saturated water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which remains an open question.</p>
      <p id="d2e8936">Effective transport properties of wet snow were then estimated based on the series of images from the drainage simulations. They include the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, water permeability, thermal conductivity, and water vapor diffusivity. These properties were computed using the Geodict software, solving boundary problems resulting from the homogenization process applied to the heat, vapor, and water transport equations. We describe the relationships of the transport properties depending on water content and dry snow density.  We show that the relative water permeability and the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity can be well reproduced by the VGM model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.191"/>, combined with the estimates of intrinsic permeability for dry snow of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.192"/>. For the effective thermal conductivity, we report large discrepancies between our numerical results and some current estimates used in snow models, such as the Crocus model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.193"/> or the model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.194"/>. A new parametrization based on both snow density and water content was suggested. Finally, a regression was proposed for the first time to predict the water vapor diffusivity of wet snow, which relies on the dry snow diffusivity estimated from the self-consistent model, the water content, and the snow density. This regression is close to vapor diffusivity parameterizations used for soils <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.195"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e8954">Results of this study are a first step toward a better characterization of the distribution of liquid water in the pore space of snow, as well as a better modeling of the physical properties of wet snow. Future studies will take into account additional processes, such as the transformation of the microstructure by phase changes and the movement of water by gravity.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e8961">The equations of the boundary problems that were solved to compute the effective wet snow properties are available in the Supplement. The Supplement also includes detailed presentations of the 34 images used in this study, with property tables, downward and upward views, and mean curvature histograms. Finally, the computed values of imbibition and drainage simulations on our snow samples, the resulting VG parameters, and the numerical estimations of conductivity, water vapor diffusivity, and water permeability are also in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e8964">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2923-2026-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2923-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e8973">FF, CG and NC proposed the study. FF and NC acquired and prepared the image dataset. NA, LB and CG conducted the imbibition and drainage numerical simulations. The analyses and interpretations were carried out by LB, NA, CG, NC, and FF. LB and NA prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e8979">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e8985">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e8991">We thank the ESRF ID19 beamline and the tomographic service of the 3SR laboratory, where the 3D images were obtained.  We warmly thank the editor Jürg Schweizer and the reviewers, Michael Lombardo and two anonymous reviewers, for their fruitful comments, which significantly helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e8996">The 3SR lab is part of the Labex Tec 21 (Investissements d’Avenir, grant ANR-11-LABX-0030). CNRM/CEN is part of Labex OSUG@2020 (Investissements d’Avenir, grant ANR-10-LABX-0056). This research has been supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche through the MiMESis-3D ANR project (ANR-19-CE01-0009). Lisa Bouvet's current position is funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (IVORI, grant no. 949516).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e9002">This paper was edited by Jürg Schweizer and reviewed by Michael Lombardo and two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Adachi et al.(2020)Adachi, Yamaguchi, Ozeki, and Kose</label><mixed-citation>Adachi, S., Yamaguchi, S., Ozeki, T., and Kose, K.: Application of a magnetic resonance imaging method for nondestructive, three-dimensional, high-resolution measurement of the water content of wet snow samples, Front. Earth Sci., 8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2020.00179</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Ahrenholz et al.(2008)Ahrenholz, Tölke, Lehmann, Peters, Kaestner, Krafczyk, and Durner</label><mixed-citation>Ahrenholz, B., Tölke, J., Lehmann, P., Peters, A., Kaestner, A., Krafczyk, M., and Durner, W.: Prediction of capillary hysteresis in a porous material using lattice-Boltzmann methods and comparison to experimental data and a morphological pore network model, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1151–1173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.03.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.03.009</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Arnold et al.(2023)Arnold, Dragovits, Linden, Hinz, and Ott</label><mixed-citation>Arnold, P., Dragovits, M., Linden, S., Hinz, C., and Ott, H.: Forced imbibition and uncertainty modeling using the morphological method, Adv. Water Resour., 172, 104381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104381" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104381</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Auriault(1987)</label><mixed-citation>Auriault, J.-L.: Non saturated deformable porous media: quasi-statics, Transport Porous Med., 2, 45–64, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208536" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00208536</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Auriault et al.(2009)Auriault, Boutin, and Geindreau.</label><mixed-citation>Auriault, J.-L., Boutin, C., and Geindreau., C.: Homogenization of coupled phenomena in heterogenous media, Wiley-ISTE, London, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470612033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9780470612033</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Avanzi et al.(2017)Avanzi, Petrucci, Matzl, Schneebeli, and De Michele</label><mixed-citation>Avanzi, F., Petrucci, G., Matzl, M., Schneebeli, M., and De Michele, C.: Early formation of preferential flow in a homogeneous snowpack observed by micro-CT, Water Resour. Res., 53, 3713–3729, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016WR019502</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Becker et al.(2008)Becker, Schulz, and Wiegmann</label><mixed-citation>Becker, J., Schulz, V., and Wiegmann, A.: Numerical determination of two-phase material parameters of a gas diffusion Layer using tomography images, J. Fuel Cell Sci. Tech., 5, 021006, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2821600" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1115/1.2821600</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Berg et al.(2016)Berg, Rücker, Ott, Georgiadis, van der Linde, Enzmann, Kersten, Armstrong, de With, Becker, and Wiegmann</label><mixed-citation>Berg, S., Rücker, M., Ott, H., Georgiadis, A., van der Linde, H., Enzmann, F., Kersten, M., Armstrong, R., de With, S., Becker, J., and Wiegmann, A.: Connected pathway relative permeability from pore-scale imaging of imbibition, Adv. Water Resour., 90, 24–35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.01.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.01.010</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bhatta et al.(2024)Bhatta, Gautam, Farhan, Tafreshi, and Pourdeyhimi</label><mixed-citation>Bhatta, N., Gautam, S., Farhan, N. M., Tafreshi, H. V., and Pourdeyhimi, B.: Accuracy of the pore morphology method in modeling fluid saturation in 3D fibrous domains, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 63, 18147–18159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02939" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02939</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bouvet et al.(2022)Bouvet, Calonne, Flin, and Geindreau</label><mixed-citation>Bouvet, L., Calonne, N., Flin, F., and Geindreau, C.: Snow equi-temperature metamorphism described by a phase-field model applicable on micro-tomographic images: prediction of microstructural and transport properties, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14, e2022MS002998, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS002998" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022MS002998</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Bouvet et al.(2024)Bouvet, Calonne, Flin, and Geindreau</label><mixed-citation>Bouvet, L., Calonne, N., Flin, F., and Geindreau, C.: Multiscale modeling of heat and mass transfer in dry snow: influence of the condensation coefficient and comparison with experiments, The Cryosphere, 18, 4285–4313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4285-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-18-4285-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Brondex et al.(2023)Brondex, Fourteau, Dumont, Hagenmuller, Calonne, Tuzet, and Löwe</label><mixed-citation>Brondex, J., Fourteau, K., Dumont, M., Hagenmuller, P., Calonne, N., Tuzet, F., and Löwe, H.: A finite-element framework to explore the numerical solution of the coupled problem of heat conduction, water vapor diffusion, and settlement in dry snow (IvoriFEM v0.1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7075–7106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7075-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-16-7075-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Brzoska et al.(1999)Brzoska, Lesaffre, Coléou, Xu, and Pieritz</label><mixed-citation>Brzoska, J. B., Lesaffre, B., Coléou, C., Xu, K., and Pieritz, R. A.: Computation of 3D curvatures on a wet snow sample, Eur. Phys. J. AP, 7, 45–57, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap:1999198" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/epjap:1999198</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Calonne et al.(2011)Calonne, Flin, Morin, Lesaffre, Rolland du Roscoat, and Geindreau</label><mixed-citation>Calonne, N., Flin, F., Morin, S., Lesaffre, B., Rolland du Roscoat, S., and Geindreau, C.: Numerical and experimental investigations of the effective thermal conductivity of snow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L23501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049234" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049234</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Calonne et al.(2012)Calonne, Geindreau, Flin, Morin, Lesaffre, Rolland du Roscoat, and Charrier</label><mixed-citation>Calonne, N., Geindreau, C., Flin, F., Morin, S., Lesaffre, B., Rolland du Roscoat, S., and Charrier, P.: 3-D image-based numerical computations of snow permeability: links to specific surface area, density, and microstructural anisotropy, The Cryosphere, 6, 939–951, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-939-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-6-939-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Calonne et al.(2014a)Calonne, Flin, Geindreau, Lesaffre, and Rolland du Roscoat</label><mixed-citation>Calonne, N., Flin, F., Geindreau, C., Lesaffre, B., and Rolland du Roscoat, S.: Study of a temperature gradient metamorphism of snow from 3-D images: time evolution of microstructures, physical properties and their associated anisotropy, The Cryosphere, 8, 2255–2274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2255-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-2255-2014</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Calonne et al.(2014b)Calonne, Geindreau, and Flin</label><mixed-citation>Calonne, N., Geindreau, C., and Flin, F.: Macroscopic modeling for heat and water vapor transfer in dry snow by homogenization, J. Phys. Chem. B, 118, 13393–13403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5052535" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp5052535</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Calonne et al.(2015)Calonne, Geindreau, and Flin</label><mixed-citation>Calonne, N., Geindreau, C., and Flin, F.: Macroscopic modeling of heat and water vapor transfer with phase change in dry snow based on an upscaling method: influence of air convection, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 120, 2476–2497, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003605" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JF003605</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Calonne et al.(2022)Calonne, Burr, Philip, Flin, and Geindreau</label><mixed-citation>Calonne, N., Burr, A., Philip, A., Flin, F., and Geindreau, C.: Effective coefficient of diffusion and permeability of firn at Dome C and Lock In, Antarctica, and of various snow types – estimates over the 100–850 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> density range, The Cryosphere, 16, 967–980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-967-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-16-967-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Cheng et al.(2012)Cheng, Kang, Perfect, Voisin, Horita, Bilheux, Warren, Jacobson, and Hussey</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, C. L., Kang, M., Perfect, E., Voisin, S., Horita, J., Bilheux, H. Z., Warren, J. M., Jacobson, D. L., and Hussey, D. S.: Average Soil Water Retention Curves Measured by Neutron Radiography, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 76, 1184–1191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0313" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2011.0313</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Cho et al.(2022)Cho, Lee, Kim, Lee, and Lee</label><mixed-citation>Cho, J. Y., Lee, H. M., Kim, J. H., Lee, W., and Lee, J. S.: Numerical simulation of gas-liquid transport in porous media using 3D color-gradient lattice Boltzmann method: trapped air and oxygen diffusion coefficient analysis, Eng. Appl. Comp. Fluid, 16, 177–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.2008012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/19942060.2021.2008012</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Clayton(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Clayton, W. S.: Effects of pore scale dead-end air fingers on relative permeabilities for air sparging in soils, Water Resour. Res., 35, 2909–2919, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900202" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999WR900202</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Colbeck(1974)</label><mixed-citation>Colbeck, S.: Water flow through snow overlying an impermeable boundary, Water Resour. Res., 10, 119–123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR010i001p00119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/WR010i001p00119</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Colbeck(1973)</label><mixed-citation>Colbeck, S. C.: Theory of metamorphism of wet snow, vol. 313, US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, <uri>https://erdc-library.erdc.dren.mil/server/api/core/bitstreams/81b728f8-7e24-4ef8-e053-411ac80adeb3/content</uri> (last access: 10 April 2026), 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Colbeck(1976)</label><mixed-citation>Colbeck, S. C.: An analysis of water flow in dry snow, Water Resour. Res., 12, 523–527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00523" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/WR012i003p00523</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Coléou et al.(1999)Coléou, Xu, Lesaffre, and Brzoska</label><mixed-citation>Coléou, C., Xu, K., Lesaffre, B., and Brzoska, J.-B.: Capillary rise in snow, Hydrol. Process., 13, 1721–1732, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199909)13:12/13&lt;1721::AID-HYP852&gt;3.0.CO;2-D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199909)13:12/13&lt;1721::AID-HYP852&gt;3.0.CO;2-D</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Daanen and Nieber(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Daanen, R. P. and Nieber, J. L.: Model for coupled liquid water flow and heat transport with phase change in a snowpack, J. Cold Reg. Eng., 23, 43–68, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2009)23:2(43)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2009)23:2(43)</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>d'Amboise et al.(2017)d'Amboise, Müller, Oxarango, Morin, and Schuler</label><mixed-citation>D'Amboise, C. J. L., Müller, K., Oxarango, L., Morin, S., and Schuler, T. V.: Implementation of a physically based water percolation routine in the Crocus/SURFEX (V7.3) snowpack model, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3547–3566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3547-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-3547-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Farooq et al.(2024)Farooq, Gorczewska-Langner, and Szymkiewicz</label><mixed-citation>Farooq, U., Gorczewska-Langner, W., and Szymkiewicz, A.: Water retention curves of sandy soils obtained from direct measurements, particle size distribution, and infiltration experiments, Vadose Zone J., 23, e20364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/vzj2.20364</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Fierz et al.(2009)Fierz, Armstrong, Durand, Etchevers, Greene, McClung, Nishimura, Satyawali, and Sokratov</label><mixed-citation>Fierz, C., Armstrong, R. L., Durand, Y., Etchevers, P., Greene, E., McClung, D. M., Nishimura, K., Satyawali, P. K., and Sokratov, S. A.: The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground, IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology, IACS Contribution no 1, 83, , <uri>https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000186462</uri> (last access: 10 April 2026), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Flin et al.(2004)Flin, Brzoska, Lesaffre, Coléou, and Pieritz</label><mixed-citation>Flin, F., Brzoska, J.-B., Lesaffre, B., Coléou, C., and Pieritz, R. A.: Three-dimensional geometric measurements of snow microstructural evolution under isothermal conditions, Ann. Glaciology, 38, 39–44, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814942" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756404781814942</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Flin et al.(2005)Flin, Brzoska, Coeurjolly, Pieritz, Lesaffre, Coleou, Lamboley, Teytaud, Vignoles, and Delesse</label><mixed-citation>Flin, F., Brzoska, J.-B., Coeurjolly, D., Pieritz, R., Lesaffre, B., Coleou, C., Lamboley, P., Teytaud, O., Vignoles, G., and Delesse, J.-F.: Adaptive estimation of normals and surface area for discrete 3-D objects: application to snow binary data from X-ray tomography, IEEE T. Image Process., 14, 585–596, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2005.846021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TIP.2005.846021</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Flin et al.(2011)Flin, Lesaffre, Dufour, Gillibert, Hasan, Rolland du Roscoat, Cabanes, and Puglièse</label><mixed-citation>Flin, F., Lesaffre, B., Dufour, A., Gillibert, L., Hasan, A., Rolland du Roscoat, S., Cabanes, S., and Puglièse, P.: On the computations of specific surface area and specific grain contact area from snow 3D images, in: Physics and Chemistry of Ice, edited by: Furukawa, Y., Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo, Japan, 321–328, <uri>https://frederic-flin.github.io/pdf/flin_2011_ssa_sgca.pdf</uri> (last access: 10 April 2026),  2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Fourteau et al.(2021)Fourteau, Domine, and Hagenmuller</label><mixed-citation>Fourteau, K., Domine, F., and Hagenmuller, P.: Macroscopic water vapor diffusion is not enhanced in snow, The Cryosphere, 15, 389–406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-389-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-15-389-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Fourteau et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Fourteau, K., Brondex, J., Cancès, C., and Dumont, M.: Numerical strategies for representing Richards' equation and its couplings in snowpack models, Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 3193–3212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3193-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-19-3193-2026</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Galindo-Torres et al.(2016)Galindo-Torres, Scheuermann, and Li</label><mixed-citation>Galindo-Torres, S., Scheuermann, A., and Li, L.: Boundary effects on the soil water characteristic curves obtained from lattice Boltzmann simulations, Comput. Geotech., 71, 136–146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.09.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.09.008</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Gerdel(1954)</label><mixed-citation>Gerdel, R. W.: The transmission of water through snow, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 35, 475–485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/TR035i003p00475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/TR035i003p00475</ext-link>, 1954.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Hansen and Foslien(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, A. C. and Foslien, W. E.: A macroscale mixture theory analysis of deposition and sublimation rates during heat and mass transfer in dry snow, The Cryosphere, 9, 1857–1878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1857-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-1857-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Hilpert and Miller(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Hilpert, M. and Miller, C. T.: Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in totally wetting porous media, Adv. Water Resour., 24, 243–255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00056-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00056-7</ext-link>, pore Scale Modeling, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Hirashima et al.(2014)Hirashima, Yamaguchi, and Katsushima</label><mixed-citation>Hirashima, H., Yamaguchi, S., and Katsushima, T.: A multi-dimensional water transport model to reproduce preferential flow in the snowpack, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 108, 80–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.09.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.09.004</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Jettestuen et al.(2013)Jettestuen, Helland, and Prodanović</label><mixed-citation>Jettestuen, E., Helland, J. O., and Prodanović, M.: A level set method for simulating capillary-controlled displacements at the pore scale with nonzero contact angles, Water Resour. Res., 49, 4645–4661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20334" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wrcr.20334</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Joekar-Niasar and Hassanizadeh(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Joekar-Niasar, V. and Hassanizadeh, S. M.: Analysis of fundamentals of two-phase flow in porous media using dynamic pore-network models: a review, Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec., 42, 1895–1976, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2011.574101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10643389.2011.574101</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Jones et al.(2024)Jones, Moure, and Fu</label><mixed-citation>Jones, N. D., Moure, A., and Fu, X.: Pattern formation of freezing infiltration in porous media, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 123802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.123802" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.123802</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Kaempfer et al.(2005)Kaempfer, Schneebeli, and Sokratov</label><mixed-citation>Kaempfer, T. U., Schneebeli, M., and Sokratov, S. A.: A microstructural approach to model heat transfer in snow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023873" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023873</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Katsushima et al.(2013)Katsushima, Yamaguchi, Kumakura, and Sato</label><mixed-citation>Katsushima, T., Yamaguchi, S., Kumakura, T., and Sato, A.: Experimental analysis of preferential flow in dry snowpack, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 85, 206–216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.09.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.09.012</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Knight(1967)</label><mixed-citation>Knight, C. A.: The contact angle of water on ice, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 25, 280–284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(67)90031-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9797(67)90031-8</ext-link>, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Kristensen et al.(2010)Kristensen, Thorbjørn, Jensen, Pedersen, and Moldrup</label><mixed-citation>Kristensen, A. H., Thorbjørn, A., Jensen, M. P., Pedersen, M., and Moldrup, P.: Gas-phase diffusivity and tortuosity of structured soils, J. Contam. Hydrol., 115, 26–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.03.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.03.003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Lafaysse et al.(2025)Lafaysse, Dumont, De Fleurian, Fructus, Nheili, Viallon-Galinier, Baron, Boone, Bouchet, Brondex, Carmagnola, Cluzet, Fourteau, Haddjeri, Hagenmuller, Mazzotti, Minvielle, Morin, Quéno, Roussel, Spandre, Tuzet, and Vionnet</label><mixed-citation>Lafaysse, M., Dumont, M., De Fleurian, B., Fructus, M., Nheili, R., Viallon-Galinier, L., Baron, M., Boone, A., Bouchet, A., Brondex, J., Carmagnola, C., Cluzet, B., Fourteau, K., Haddjeri, A., Hagenmuller, P., Mazzotti, G., Minvielle, M., Morin, S., Quéno, L., Roussel, L., Spandre, P., Tuzet, F., and Vionnet, V.: Version 3.0 of the Crocus snowpack model, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2025-4540</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Lehning et al.(2002)Lehning, Bartelt, Brown, and Fierz</label><mixed-citation>Lehning, M., Bartelt, P., Brown, B., and Fierz, C.: A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning Part III: meteorological forcing, thin layer formation and evaluation, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., p. 16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00072-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00072-1</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Leroux and Pomeroy(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Leroux, N. R. and Pomeroy, J. W.: Modelling capillary hysteresis effects on preferential flow through melting and cold layered snowpacks, Adv. Water Resour., 107, 250–264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.06.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.06.024</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Lesaffre et al.(1998)Lesaffre, Pougatch, and Martin</label><mixed-citation>Lesaffre, B., Pougatch, E., and Martin, E.: Objective determination of snow-grain characteristics from images, Ann. Glaciology, 26, 112–118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/1998AoG26-1-112-118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/1998AoG26-1-112-118</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Likos et al.(2013)Likos, Lu, and Godt</label><mixed-citation>Likos, W. J., Lu, N., and Godt, J. W.: Hysteresis and uncertainty in soil water-retention curve parameters, J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 140, 04013050, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001071</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Liu et al.(2022)Liu, Zhou, long Shen, and Li</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Zhou, A., long Shen, S., and Li, J.: Modeling drainage in porous media considering locally variable contact angle based on pore morphology method, J. Hydrol., 612, 128157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128157</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Lombardo et al.(2025)Lombardo, Fees, Kaestner, van Herwijnen, Schweizer, and Lehmann</label><mixed-citation>Lombardo, M., Fees, A., Kaestner, A., van Herwijnen, A., Schweizer, J., and Lehmann, P.: Quantification of capillary rise dynamics in snow using neutron radiography, The Cryosphere, 19, 4437–4458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4437-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-19-4437-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Marsh and Woo(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Marsh, P. and Woo, M.-K.: Meltwater movement in natural heterogeneous snow covers, Water Resour. Res., 21, 1710–1716, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i011p01710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/WR021i011p01710</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Millington and Quirk(1961)</label><mixed-citation>Millington, R. and Quirk, J.: Permeability of porous solids, T. Faraday Soc., 57, 1200–1207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9615701200" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/TF9615701200</ext-link>, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Moldrup et al.(2000)Moldrup, Olesen, Schjønning, Yamaguchi, and Rolston</label><mixed-citation>Moldrup, P., Olesen, T., Schjønning, P., Yamaguchi, T., and Rolston, D. E.: Predicting the gas diffusion coefficient in undisturbed soil from soil water characteristics, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 94–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.64194x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2000.64194x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Moure et al.(2023)Moure, Jones, Pawlak, Meyer, and Fu</label><mixed-citation>Moure, A., Jones, N., Pawlak, J., Meyer, C., and Fu, X.: A thermodynamic nonequilibrium model for preferential infiltration and refreezing of melt in snow, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR034035, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR034035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022WR034035</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Mualem(1976)</label><mixed-citation>Mualem, Y.: A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media, Water Resour. Res., 12, 513–522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/WR012i003p00513</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Prodanović and Bryant(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Prodanović, M. and Bryant, S. L.: A level set method for determining critical curvatures for drainage and imbibition, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 304, 442–458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.08.048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jcis.2006.08.048</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Quéno et al.(2020)Quéno, Fierz, van Herwijnen, Longridge, and Wever</label><mixed-citation>Quéno, L., Fierz, C., van Herwijnen, A., Longridge, D., and Wever, N.: Deep ice layer formation in an alpine snowpack: monitoring and modeling, The Cryosphere, 14, 3449–3464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3449-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-14-3449-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Raymond and Tusima(1979)</label><mixed-citation>Raymond, C. F. and Tusima, K.: Grain coarsening of water-saturated snow, J. Glaciol., 22, 83–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S0022143000014076</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Richards(1931)</label><mixed-citation>Richards, L. A.: Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums, J. Appl. Phys., 1, 318–333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1745010</ext-link>, 1931.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Schulz et al.(2015)Schulz, Wargo, and Kumbur</label><mixed-citation>Schulz, V. P., Wargo, E. A., and Kumbur, E. C.: Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in porous media featuring a locally variable contact angle, Transport Porous Med., 107, 13–25, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0422-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11242-014-0422-4</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Schweizer et al.(2003)Schweizer, Bruce Jamieson, and Schneebeli</label><mixed-citation>Schweizer, J., Bruce Jamieson, J., and Schneebeli, M.: Snow avalanche formation, Rev. Geophys., 41, 1016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RG000123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002RG000123</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Shimizu(1970)</label><mixed-citation>Shimizu, H.: Air permeability of deposited snow, Contributions from the Institute of Low Temperature Science, 22, 1–32, <uri>https://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2115/20234/1/A22_p1-32.pdf</uri> (last access: 10 April 2026), 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Silin and Patzek(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Silin, D. and Patzek, T.: Pore space morphology analysis using maximal inscribed spheres, Physica A, 371, 336–360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.048</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Singh et al.(1997)Singh, Spitzbart, Hübl, and Weinmeister</label><mixed-citation>Singh, P., Spitzbart, G., Hübl, H., and Weinmeister, H.: Hydrological response of snowpack under rain-on-snow events: a field study, J. Hydrol., 202, 1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00004-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00004-8</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Sturm and Johnson(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Sturm, M. and Johnson, J.: Natural convection in the subarctic snow cover, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 96, 11657–11671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB00895" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JB00895</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Sturm et al.(1997)Sturm, Holmgren, König, and Morris</label><mixed-citation>Sturm, M., Holmgren, J., König, M., and Morris, K.: The thermal conductivity of seasonal snow, J. Glaciol., 43, 26–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000002781" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S0022143000002781</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Suh et al.(2024)Suh, Na, and Choo</label><mixed-citation>Suh, H. S., Na, S., and Choo, J.: Pore-morphology-based estimation of the freezing characteristic curve of water-saturated porous media, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2024WR037035, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024WR037035</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Sweijen et al.(2016)Sweijen, Nikooee, Hassanizadeh, and Chareyre</label><mixed-citation>Sweijen, T., Nikooee, E., Hassanizadeh, S. M., and Chareyre, B.: The Effects of Swelling and Porosity Change on Capillarity: DEM Coupled with a Pore-Unit Assembly Method, Transport Porous Med., 113, 207–226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-016-0689-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11242-016-0689-8</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Tengattini et al.(2020)Tengattini, Lenoir, Ando, Giroud, Atkins, Beaucour, and Viggiani</label><mixed-citation>Tengattini, A., Lenoir, N., Ando, E., Giroud, B., Atkins, D., Beaucour, J., and Viggiani, G.: NeXT-Grenoble, the neutron and X-ray tomograph in Grenoble, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 968, 163939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.163939" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.nima.2020.163939</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Thoemen et al.(2008)Thoemen, Walther, and Wiegmann</label><mixed-citation>Thoemen, H., Walther, T., and Wiegmann, A.: 3D simulation of macroscopic heat and mass transfer properties from the microstructure of wood fibre networks, Comp. Sci. Techn., 68, 608–616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.014</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Torquato(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Torquato, S.: Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic properties, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Springer New York, <uri>https://books.google.fr/books?id=PhG_X4-8DPAC</uri> (last access: 10 April 2026), 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>van Genuchten(1980)</label><mixed-citation>van Genuchten, M. T.: A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>van Lier and Pinheiro(2018)</label><mixed-citation>van Lier, Q. d. J. and Pinheiro, E. A. R.: An alert regarding a common misinterpretation of the van Genuchten α parameter, Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo, 42, e0170343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20170343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1590/18069657rbcs20170343</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Vereecken et al.(2010)Vereecken, Weynants, Javaux, Pachepsky, Schaap, and van Genuchten</label><mixed-citation>Vereecken, H., Weynants, M., Javaux, M., Pachepsky, Y., Schaap, M. G., and van Genuchten, M. T.: Using pedotransfer functions to estimate the van Genuchten–Mualem soil hydraulic properties: a review, Vadose Zone J., 9, 795–820, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/vzj2010.0045</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Vionnet et al.(2012)Vionnet, Brun, Morin, Boone, Faroux, Le Moigne, Martin, and Willemet</label><mixed-citation>Vionnet, V., Brun, E., Morin, S., Boone, A., Faroux, S., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., and Willemet, J.-M.: The detailed snowpack scheme Crocus and its implementation in SURFEX v7.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 773–791, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-773-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-773-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Vogel et al.(2005)Vogel, Tölke, Schulz, Krafczyk, and Roth</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, H.-J., Tölke, J., Schulz, V. P., Krafczyk, M., and Roth, K.: Comparison of a lattice-Boltzmann model, a full-morphology model, and a pore network model for determining capillary pressure-saturation relationships, Vadose Zone J., 4, 380–388, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.0114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/vzj2004.0114</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Wakahama(1968)</label><mixed-citation> Wakahama, G.: The metamorphism of wet snow, IAHS Publ., 79, 370–379, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Wever et al.(2014)Wever, Fierz, Mitterer, Hirashima, and Lehning</label><mixed-citation>Wever, N., Fierz, C., Mitterer, C., Hirashima, H., and Lehning, M.: Solving Richards Equation for snow improves snowpack meltwater runoff estimations in detailed multi-layer snowpack model, The Cryosphere, 8, 257–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-257-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-257-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Wever et al.(2015)Wever, Schmid, Heilig, Eisen, Fierz, and Lehning</label><mixed-citation>Wever, N., Schmid, L., Heilig, A., Eisen, O., Fierz, C., and Lehning, M.: Verification of the multi-layer SNOWPACK model with different water transport schemes, The Cryosphere, 9, 2271–2293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2271-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-2271-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Wever et al.(2016)Wever, Würzer, Fierz, and Lehning</label><mixed-citation>Wever, N., Würzer, S., Fierz, C., and Lehning, M.: Simulating ice layer formation under the presence of preferential flow in layered snowpacks, The Cryosphere, 10, 2731–2744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2731-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-10-2731-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Xiong et al.(2016)Xiong, Baychev, and Jivkov</label><mixed-citation>Xiong, Q., Baychev, T. G., and Jivkov, A. P.: Review of pore network modelling of porous media: experimental characterisations, network constructions and applications to reactive transport, J. Contam. Hydrol., 192, 101–117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.07.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.07.002</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Yamaguchi et al.(2010)Yamaguchi, Katsushima, Sato, and Kumakura</label><mixed-citation>Yamaguchi, S., Katsushima, T., Sato, A., and Kumakura, T.: Water retention curve of snow with different grain sizes, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 64, 87–93, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.05.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.05.008</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Yamaguchi et al.(2012)Yamaguchi, Watanabe, Katsushima, Sato, and Kumakura</label><mixed-citation>Yamaguchi, S., Watanabe, K., Katsushima, T., Sato, A., and Kumakura, T.: Dependence of the water retention curve of snow on snow characteristics, Ann. Glaciology, 53, 6–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012AoG61A001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2012AoG61A001</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Yamaguchi et al.(2025)Yamaguchi, Adachi, and Sunako</label><mixed-citation>Yamaguchi, S., Adachi, S., and Sunako, S.: A novel method to visualize liquid distribution in snow: superimposition of MRI and X-ray CT images, Ann. Glaciology, 65, e11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.77" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2023.77</ext-link>, 2025. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Yen(1981)</label><mixed-citation>Yen, Y.-C.: Review of thermal properties of snow, ice, and sea ice, vol. 81, US Army, Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, <uri>https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA103734.pdf</uri> (last access: 10 April 2026), 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Zhang et al.(2025)Zhang, Liang, Zhang, Wang, Yang, Chen, Tang, Pei, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Liang, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, D., Yang, J., Chen, Y., Tang, L., Pei, X., and Zhou, B.: Numerical study of side boundary effects in pore-scale digital rock flow simulations, Fluids, 10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10120305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/fluids10120305</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Simulating liquid water distribution at the pore scale in snow: water retention curves and effective transport properties</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Adachi et al.(2020)Adachi, Yamaguchi, Ozeki, and Kose</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adachi, S., Yamaguchi, S., Ozeki, T., and Kose, K.:
Application of a magnetic resonance imaging method for nondestructive, three-dimensional, high-resolution measurement of the water content of wet snow samples, Front. Earth Sci., 8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00179" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00179</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Ahrenholz et al.(2008)Ahrenholz, Tölke, Lehmann, Peters, Kaestner, Krafczyk, and Durner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ahrenholz, B., Tölke, J., Lehmann, P., Peters, A., Kaestner, A., Krafczyk, M., and Durner, W.:
Prediction of capillary hysteresis in a porous material using lattice-Boltzmann methods and comparison to experimental data and a morphological pore network model, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1151–1173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.03.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.03.009</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Arnold et al.(2023)Arnold, Dragovits, Linden, Hinz, and Ott</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arnold, P., Dragovits, M., Linden, S., Hinz, C., and Ott, H.:
Forced imbibition and uncertainty modeling using the morphological method, Adv. Water Resour., 172, 104381, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104381" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104381</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Auriault(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Auriault, J.-L.:
Non saturated deformable porous media: quasi-statics, Transport Porous Med., 2, 45–64, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208536" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208536</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Auriault et al.(2009)Auriault, Boutin, and Geindreau.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Auriault, J.-L., Boutin, C., and Geindreau., C.:
Homogenization of coupled phenomena in heterogenous media, Wiley-ISTE, London, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470612033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470612033</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Avanzi et al.(2017)Avanzi, Petrucci, Matzl, Schneebeli, and De Michele</label><mixed-citation>
      
Avanzi, F., Petrucci, G., Matzl, M., Schneebeli, M., and De Michele, C.:
Early formation of preferential flow in a homogeneous snowpack observed by micro-CT, Water Resour. Res., 53, 3713–3729, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019502</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Becker et al.(2008)Becker, Schulz, and Wiegmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Becker, J., Schulz, V., and Wiegmann, A.:
Numerical determination of two-phase material parameters of a gas diffusion Layer using tomography images, J. Fuel Cell Sci. Tech., 5, 021006, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2821600" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2821600</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Berg et al.(2016)Berg, Rücker, Ott, Georgiadis, van der Linde, Enzmann, Kersten, Armstrong, de With, Becker, and Wiegmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berg, S., Rücker, M., Ott, H., Georgiadis, A., van der Linde, H., Enzmann, F., Kersten, M., Armstrong, R., de With, S., Becker, J., and Wiegmann, A.:
Connected pathway relative permeability from pore-scale imaging of imbibition, Adv. Water Resour., 90, 24–35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.01.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.01.010</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bhatta et al.(2024)Bhatta, Gautam, Farhan, Tafreshi, and Pourdeyhimi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bhatta, N., Gautam, S., Farhan, N. M., Tafreshi, H. V., and Pourdeyhimi, B.:
Accuracy of the pore morphology method in modeling fluid saturation in 3D fibrous domains, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 63, 18147–18159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02939" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02939</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bouvet et al.(2022)Bouvet, Calonne, Flin, and Geindreau</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bouvet, L., Calonne, N., Flin, F., and Geindreau, C.:
Snow equi-temperature metamorphism described by a phase-field model applicable on micro-tomographic images: prediction of microstructural and transport properties, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14, e2022MS002998, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS002998" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS002998</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Bouvet et al.(2024)Bouvet, Calonne, Flin, and Geindreau</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bouvet, L., Calonne, N., Flin, F., and Geindreau, C.:
Multiscale modeling of heat and mass transfer in dry snow: influence of the condensation coefficient and comparison with experiments, The Cryosphere, 18, 4285–4313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4285-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4285-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Brondex et al.(2023)Brondex, Fourteau, Dumont, Hagenmuller, Calonne, Tuzet, and Löwe</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brondex, J., Fourteau, K., Dumont, M., Hagenmuller, P., Calonne, N., Tuzet, F., and Löwe, H.:
A finite-element framework to explore the numerical solution of the coupled problem of heat conduction, water vapor diffusion, and settlement in dry snow (IvoriFEM v0.1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7075–7106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7075-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7075-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Brzoska et al.(1999)Brzoska, Lesaffre, Coléou, Xu, and Pieritz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brzoska, J. B., Lesaffre, B., Coléou, C., Xu, K., and Pieritz, R. A.:
Computation of 3D curvatures on a wet snow sample, Eur. Phys. J. AP, 7, 45–57, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap:1999198" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap:1999198</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Calonne et al.(2011)Calonne, Flin, Morin, Lesaffre, Rolland du Roscoat, and Geindreau</label><mixed-citation>
      
Calonne, N., Flin, F., Morin, S., Lesaffre, B., Rolland du Roscoat, S., and Geindreau, C.:
Numerical and experimental investigations of the effective thermal conductivity of snow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L23501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049234" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049234</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Calonne et al.(2012)Calonne, Geindreau, Flin, Morin, Lesaffre, Rolland du Roscoat, and Charrier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Calonne, N., Geindreau, C., Flin, F., Morin, S., Lesaffre, B., Rolland du Roscoat, S., and Charrier, P.:
3-D image-based numerical computations of snow permeability: links to specific surface area, density, and microstructural anisotropy, The Cryosphere, 6, 939–951, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-939-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-939-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Calonne et al.(2014a)Calonne, Flin, Geindreau, Lesaffre, and Rolland du Roscoat</label><mixed-citation>
      
Calonne, N., Flin, F., Geindreau, C., Lesaffre, B., and Rolland du Roscoat, S.:
Study of a temperature gradient metamorphism of snow from 3-D images: time evolution of microstructures, physical properties and their associated anisotropy, The Cryosphere, 8, 2255–2274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2255-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2255-2014</a>, 2014a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Calonne et al.(2014b)Calonne, Geindreau, and Flin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Calonne, N., Geindreau, C., and Flin, F.:
Macroscopic modeling for heat and water vapor transfer in dry snow by homogenization, J. Phys. Chem. B, 118, 13393–13403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5052535" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5052535</a>, 2014b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Calonne et al.(2015)Calonne, Geindreau, and Flin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Calonne, N., Geindreau, C., and Flin, F.:
Macroscopic modeling of heat and water vapor transfer with phase change in dry snow based on an upscaling method: influence of air convection, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 120, 2476–2497, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003605" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003605</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Calonne et al.(2022)Calonne, Burr, Philip, Flin, and Geindreau</label><mixed-citation>
      
Calonne, N., Burr, A., Philip, A., Flin, F., and Geindreau, C.:
Effective coefficient of diffusion and permeability of firn at Dome C and Lock In, Antarctica, and of various snow types – estimates over the 100–850&thinsp;kg m<sup>−3</sup> density range, The Cryosphere, 16, 967–980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-967-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-967-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Cheng et al.(2012)Cheng, Kang, Perfect, Voisin, Horita, Bilheux, Warren, Jacobson, and Hussey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, C. L., Kang, M., Perfect, E., Voisin, S., Horita, J., Bilheux, H. Z., Warren, J. M., Jacobson, D. L., and Hussey, D. S.:
Average Soil Water Retention Curves Measured by Neutron Radiography, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 76, 1184–1191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0313" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0313</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Cho et al.(2022)Cho, Lee, Kim, Lee, and Lee</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cho, J. Y., Lee, H. M., Kim, J. H., Lee, W., and Lee, J. S.:
Numerical simulation of gas-liquid transport in porous media using 3D color-gradient lattice Boltzmann method: trapped air and oxygen diffusion coefficient analysis, Eng. Appl. Comp. Fluid, 16, 177–195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.2008012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.2008012</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Clayton(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clayton, W. S.:
Effects of pore scale dead-end air fingers on relative permeabilities for air sparging in soils, Water Resour. Res., 35, 2909–2919, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900202" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900202</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Colbeck(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Colbeck, S.:
Water flow through snow overlying an impermeable boundary, Water Resour. Res., 10, 119–123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR010i001p00119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/WR010i001p00119</a>, 1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Colbeck(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Colbeck, S. C.: Theory of metamorphism of wet snow, vol. 313, US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, <a href="https://erdc-library.erdc.dren.mil/server/api/core/bitstreams/81b728f8-7e24-4ef8-e053-411ac80adeb3/content" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 April 2026), 1973.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Colbeck(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Colbeck, S. C.:
An analysis of water flow in dry snow, Water Resour. Res., 12, 523–527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00523" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00523</a>, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Coléou et al.(1999)Coléou, Xu, Lesaffre, and Brzoska</label><mixed-citation>
      
Coléou, C., Xu, K., Lesaffre, B., and Brzoska, J.-B.:
Capillary rise in snow, Hydrol. Process., 13, 1721–1732, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199909)13:12/13&lt;1721::AID-HYP852&gt;3.0.CO;2-D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199909)13:12/13&lt;1721::AID-HYP852&gt;3.0.CO;2-D</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Daanen and Nieber(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Daanen, R. P. and Nieber, J. L.:
Model for coupled liquid water flow and heat transport with phase change in a snowpack, J. Cold Reg. Eng., 23, 43–68, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2009)23:2(43)" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2009)23:2(43)</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>d'Amboise et al.(2017)d'Amboise, Müller, Oxarango, Morin, and Schuler</label><mixed-citation>
      
D'Amboise, C. J. L., Müller, K., Oxarango, L., Morin, S., and Schuler, T. V.:
Implementation of a physically based water percolation routine in the Crocus/SURFEX (V7.3) snowpack model, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3547–3566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3547-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3547-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Farooq et al.(2024)Farooq, Gorczewska-Langner, and Szymkiewicz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Farooq, U., Gorczewska-Langner, W., and Szymkiewicz, A.:
Water retention curves of sandy soils obtained from direct measurements, particle size distribution, and infiltration experiments, Vadose Zone J., 23, e20364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20364" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20364</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Fierz et al.(2009)Fierz, Armstrong, Durand, Etchevers, Greene, McClung, Nishimura, Satyawali, and Sokratov</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fierz, C., Armstrong, R. L., Durand, Y., Etchevers, P., Greene, E., McClung, D. M., Nishimura, K., Satyawali, P. K., and Sokratov, S. A.:
The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground, IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology, IACS Contribution no 1, 83, , <a href="https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000186462" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 April 2026), 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Flin et al.(2004)Flin, Brzoska, Lesaffre, Coléou, and Pieritz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Flin, F., Brzoska, J.-B., Lesaffre, B., Coléou, C., and Pieritz, R. A.:
Three-dimensional geometric measurements of snow microstructural evolution under isothermal conditions, Ann. Glaciology, 38, 39–44, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814942" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814942</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Flin et al.(2005)Flin, Brzoska, Coeurjolly, Pieritz, Lesaffre, Coleou, Lamboley, Teytaud, Vignoles, and Delesse</label><mixed-citation>
      
Flin, F., Brzoska, J.-B., Coeurjolly, D., Pieritz, R., Lesaffre, B., Coleou, C., Lamboley, P., Teytaud, O., Vignoles, G., and Delesse, J.-F.:
Adaptive estimation of normals and surface area for discrete 3-D objects: application to snow binary data from X-ray tomography, IEEE T. Image Process., 14, 585–596, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2005.846021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2005.846021</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Flin et al.(2011)Flin, Lesaffre, Dufour, Gillibert, Hasan, Rolland du Roscoat, Cabanes, and Puglièse</label><mixed-citation>
      
Flin, F., Lesaffre, B., Dufour, A., Gillibert, L., Hasan, A., Rolland du Roscoat, S., Cabanes, S., and Puglièse, P.:
On the computations of specific surface area and specific grain contact area from snow 3D images, in: Physics and Chemistry of Ice, edited by: Furukawa, Y., Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo, Japan, 321–328, <a href="https://frederic-flin.github.io/pdf/flin_2011_ssa_sgca.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 April 2026),  2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Fourteau et al.(2021)Fourteau, Domine, and Hagenmuller</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fourteau, K., Domine, F., and Hagenmuller, P.:
Macroscopic water vapor diffusion is not enhanced in snow, The Cryosphere, 15, 389–406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-389-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-389-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Fourteau et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fourteau, K., Brondex, J., Cancès, C., and Dumont, M.: Numerical strategies for representing Richards' equation and its couplings in snowpack models, Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 3193–3212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3193-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3193-2026</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Galindo-Torres et al.(2016)Galindo-Torres, Scheuermann, and Li</label><mixed-citation>
      
Galindo-Torres, S., Scheuermann, A., and Li, L.:
Boundary effects on the soil water characteristic curves obtained from lattice Boltzmann simulations, Comput. Geotech., 71, 136–146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.09.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.09.008</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Gerdel(1954)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gerdel, R. W.:
The transmission of water through snow, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 35, 475–485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/TR035i003p00475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/TR035i003p00475</a>, 1954.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Hansen and Foslien(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hansen, A. C. and Foslien, W. E.:
A macroscale mixture theory analysis of deposition and sublimation rates during heat and mass transfer in dry snow, The Cryosphere, 9, 1857–1878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1857-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1857-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Hilpert and Miller(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hilpert, M. and Miller, C. T.:
Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in totally wetting porous media, Adv. Water Resour., 24, 243–255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00056-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00056-7</a>, pore Scale Modeling, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Hirashima et al.(2014)Hirashima, Yamaguchi, and Katsushima</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hirashima, H., Yamaguchi, S., and Katsushima, T.:
A multi-dimensional water transport model to reproduce preferential flow in the snowpack, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 108, 80–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.09.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.09.004</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Jettestuen et al.(2013)Jettestuen, Helland, and Prodanović</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jettestuen, E., Helland, J. O., and Prodanović, M.:
A level set method for simulating capillary-controlled displacements at the pore scale with nonzero contact angles, Water Resour. Res., 49, 4645–4661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20334" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20334</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Joekar-Niasar and Hassanizadeh(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Joekar-Niasar, V. and Hassanizadeh, S. M.:
Analysis of fundamentals of two-phase flow in porous media using dynamic pore-network models: a review, Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec., 42, 1895–1976, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2011.574101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2011.574101</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Jones et al.(2024)Jones, Moure, and Fu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jones, N. D., Moure, A., and Fu, X.:
Pattern formation of freezing infiltration in porous media, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 123802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.123802" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.123802</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Kaempfer et al.(2005)Kaempfer, Schneebeli, and Sokratov</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaempfer, T. U., Schneebeli, M., and Sokratov, S. A.:
A microstructural approach to model heat transfer in snow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023873" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023873</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Katsushima et al.(2013)Katsushima, Yamaguchi, Kumakura, and Sato</label><mixed-citation>
      
Katsushima, T., Yamaguchi, S., Kumakura, T., and Sato, A.:
Experimental analysis of preferential flow in dry snowpack, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 85, 206–216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.09.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.09.012</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Knight(1967)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Knight, C. A.:
The contact angle of water on ice, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 25, 280–284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(67)90031-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(67)90031-8</a>, 1967.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Kristensen et al.(2010)Kristensen, Thorbjørn, Jensen, Pedersen, and Moldrup</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kristensen, A. H., Thorbjørn, A., Jensen, M. P., Pedersen, M., and Moldrup, P.:
Gas-phase diffusivity and tortuosity of structured soils, J. Contam. Hydrol., 115, 26–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.03.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.03.003</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Lafaysse et al.(2025)Lafaysse, Dumont, De Fleurian, Fructus, Nheili, Viallon-Galinier, Baron, Boone, Bouchet, Brondex, Carmagnola, Cluzet, Fourteau, Haddjeri, Hagenmuller, Mazzotti, Minvielle, Morin, Quéno, Roussel, Spandre, Tuzet, and Vionnet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lafaysse, M., Dumont, M., De Fleurian, B., Fructus, M., Nheili, R., Viallon-Galinier, L., Baron, M., Boone, A., Bouchet, A., Brondex, J., Carmagnola, C., Cluzet, B., Fourteau, K., Haddjeri, A., Hagenmuller, P., Mazzotti, G., Minvielle, M., Morin, S., Quéno, L., Roussel, L., Spandre, P., Tuzet, F., and Vionnet, V.:
Version 3.0 of the Crocus snowpack model, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4540</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Lehning et al.(2002)Lehning, Bartelt, Brown, and Fierz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lehning, M., Bartelt, P., Brown, B., and Fierz, C.:
A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning Part III: meteorological forcing, thin layer formation and evaluation, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., p. 16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00072-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00072-1</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Leroux and Pomeroy(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leroux, N. R. and Pomeroy, J. W.:
Modelling capillary hysteresis effects on preferential flow through melting and cold layered snowpacks, Adv. Water Resour., 107, 250–264, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.06.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.06.024</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Lesaffre et al.(1998)Lesaffre, Pougatch, and Martin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lesaffre, B., Pougatch, E., and Martin, E.:
Objective determination of snow-grain characteristics from images, Ann. Glaciology, 26, 112–118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/1998AoG26-1-112-118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/1998AoG26-1-112-118</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Likos et al.(2013)Likos, Lu, and Godt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Likos, W. J., Lu, N., and Godt, J. W.:
Hysteresis and uncertainty in soil water-retention curve parameters, J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 140, 04013050, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001071</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Liu et al.(2022)Liu, Zhou, long Shen, and Li</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X., Zhou, A., long Shen, S., and Li, J.:
Modeling drainage in porous media considering locally variable contact angle based on pore morphology method, J. Hydrol., 612, 128157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128157" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128157</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Lombardo et al.(2025)Lombardo, Fees, Kaestner, van Herwijnen, Schweizer, and Lehmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lombardo, M., Fees, A., Kaestner, A., van Herwijnen, A., Schweizer, J., and Lehmann, P.:
Quantification of capillary rise dynamics in snow using neutron radiography, The Cryosphere, 19, 4437–4458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4437-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4437-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Marsh and Woo(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marsh, P. and Woo, M.-K.:
Meltwater movement in natural heterogeneous snow covers, Water Resour. Res., 21, 1710–1716, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i011p01710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i011p01710</a>, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Millington and Quirk(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Millington, R. and Quirk, J.:
Permeability of porous solids, T. Faraday Soc., 57, 1200–1207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9615701200" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9615701200</a>, 1961.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Moldrup et al.(2000)Moldrup, Olesen, Schjønning, Yamaguchi, and Rolston</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moldrup, P., Olesen, T., Schjønning, P., Yamaguchi, T., and Rolston, D. E.:
Predicting the gas diffusion coefficient in undisturbed soil from soil water characteristics, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 94–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.64194x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.64194x</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Moure et al.(2023)Moure, Jones, Pawlak, Meyer, and Fu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moure, A., Jones, N., Pawlak, J., Meyer, C., and Fu, X.:
A thermodynamic nonequilibrium model for preferential infiltration and refreezing of melt in snow, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR034035, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR034035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR034035</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Mualem(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mualem, Y.:
A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media, Water Resour. Res., 12, 513–522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513</a>, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Prodanović and Bryant(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prodanović, M. and Bryant, S. L.:
A level set method for determining critical curvatures for drainage and imbibition, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 304, 442–458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.08.048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.08.048</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Quéno et al.(2020)Quéno, Fierz, van Herwijnen, Longridge, and Wever</label><mixed-citation>
      
Quéno, L., Fierz, C., van Herwijnen, A., Longridge, D., and Wever, N.:
Deep ice layer formation in an alpine snowpack: monitoring and modeling, The Cryosphere, 14, 3449–3464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3449-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3449-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Raymond and Tusima(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Raymond, C. F. and Tusima, K.:
Grain coarsening of water-saturated snow, J. Glaciol., 22, 83–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000014076</a>, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Richards(1931)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Richards, L. A.:
Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums, J. Appl. Phys., 1, 318–333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010</a>, 1931.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Schulz et al.(2015)Schulz, Wargo, and Kumbur</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schulz, V. P., Wargo, E. A., and Kumbur, E. C.:
Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in porous media featuring a locally variable contact angle, Transport Porous Med., 107, 13–25, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0422-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0422-4</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Schweizer et al.(2003)Schweizer, Bruce Jamieson, and Schneebeli</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schweizer, J., Bruce Jamieson, J., and Schneebeli, M.:
Snow avalanche formation, Rev. Geophys., 41, 1016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RG000123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RG000123</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Shimizu(1970)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shimizu, H.:
Air permeability of deposited snow, Contributions from the Institute of Low Temperature Science, 22, 1–32, <a href="https://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2115/20234/1/A22_p1-32.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 April 2026), 1970.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Silin and Patzek(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Silin, D. and Patzek, T.:
Pore space morphology analysis using maximal inscribed spheres, Physica A, 371, 336–360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.048</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Singh et al.(1997)Singh, Spitzbart, Hübl, and Weinmeister</label><mixed-citation>
      
Singh, P., Spitzbart, G., Hübl, H., and Weinmeister, H.:
Hydrological response of snowpack under rain-on-snow events: a field study, J. Hydrol., 202, 1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00004-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00004-8</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Sturm and Johnson(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sturm, M. and Johnson, J.:
Natural convection in the subarctic snow cover, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 96, 11657–11671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB00895" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB00895</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Sturm et al.(1997)Sturm, Holmgren, König, and Morris</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sturm, M., Holmgren, J., König, M., and Morris, K.:
The thermal conductivity of seasonal snow, J. Glaciol., 43, 26–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000002781" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000002781</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Suh et al.(2024)Suh, Na, and Choo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Suh, H. S., Na, S., and Choo, J.:
Pore-morphology-based estimation of the freezing characteristic curve of water-saturated porous media, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2024WR037035, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037035</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Sweijen et al.(2016)Sweijen, Nikooee, Hassanizadeh, and Chareyre</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sweijen, T., Nikooee, E., Hassanizadeh, S. M., and Chareyre, B.:
The Effects of Swelling and Porosity Change on Capillarity: DEM Coupled with a Pore-Unit Assembly Method, Transport Porous Med., 113, 207–226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-016-0689-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-016-0689-8</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Tengattini et al.(2020)Tengattini, Lenoir, Ando, Giroud, Atkins, Beaucour, and Viggiani</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tengattini, A., Lenoir, N., Ando, E., Giroud, B., Atkins, D., Beaucour, J., and Viggiani, G.:
NeXT-Grenoble, the neutron and X-ray tomograph in Grenoble, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 968, 163939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.163939" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.163939</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Thoemen et al.(2008)Thoemen, Walther, and Wiegmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thoemen, H., Walther, T., and Wiegmann, A.:
3D simulation of macroscopic heat and mass transfer properties from the microstructure of wood fibre networks, Comp. Sci. Techn., 68, 608–616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.014</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Torquato(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Torquato, S.:
Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic properties, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Springer New York, <a href="https://books.google.fr/books?id=PhG_X4-8DPAC" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 April 2026), 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>van Genuchten(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Genuchten, M. T.:
A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x</a>, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>van Lier and Pinheiro(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Lier, Q. d. J. and Pinheiro, E. A. R.:
An alert regarding a common misinterpretation of the van Genuchten α parameter, Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo, 42, e0170343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20170343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20170343</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Vereecken et al.(2010)Vereecken, Weynants, Javaux, Pachepsky, Schaap, and van Genuchten</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vereecken, H., Weynants, M., Javaux, M., Pachepsky, Y., Schaap, M. G., and van Genuchten, M. T.:
Using pedotransfer functions to estimate the van Genuchten–Mualem soil hydraulic properties: a review, Vadose Zone J., 9, 795–820, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0045</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Vionnet et al.(2012)Vionnet, Brun, Morin, Boone, Faroux, Le Moigne, Martin, and Willemet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vionnet, V., Brun, E., Morin, S., Boone, A., Faroux, S., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., and Willemet, J.-M.:
The detailed snowpack scheme Crocus and its implementation in SURFEX v7.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 773–791, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-773-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-773-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Vogel et al.(2005)Vogel, Tölke, Schulz, Krafczyk, and Roth</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogel, H.-J., Tölke, J., Schulz, V. P., Krafczyk, M., and Roth, K.:
Comparison of a lattice-Boltzmann model, a full-morphology model, and a pore network model for determining capillary pressure-saturation relationships, Vadose Zone J., 4, 380–388, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.0114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.0114</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Wakahama(1968)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wakahama, G.:
The metamorphism of wet snow, IAHS Publ., 79, 370–379, 1968.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Wever et al.(2014)Wever, Fierz, Mitterer, Hirashima, and Lehning</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wever, N., Fierz, C., Mitterer, C., Hirashima, H., and Lehning, M.:
Solving Richards Equation for snow improves snowpack meltwater runoff estimations in detailed multi-layer snowpack model, The Cryosphere, 8, 257–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-257-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-257-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Wever et al.(2015)Wever, Schmid, Heilig, Eisen, Fierz, and Lehning</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wever, N., Schmid, L., Heilig, A., Eisen, O., Fierz, C., and Lehning, M.:
Verification of the multi-layer SNOWPACK model with different water transport schemes, The Cryosphere, 9, 2271–2293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2271-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2271-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Wever et al.(2016)Wever, Würzer, Fierz, and Lehning</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wever, N., Würzer, S., Fierz, C., and Lehning, M.:
Simulating ice layer formation under the presence of preferential flow in layered snowpacks, The Cryosphere, 10, 2731–2744, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2731-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2731-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Xiong et al.(2016)Xiong, Baychev, and Jivkov</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xiong, Q., Baychev, T. G., and Jivkov, A. P.:
Review of pore network modelling of porous media: experimental characterisations, network constructions and applications to reactive transport, J. Contam. Hydrol., 192, 101–117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.07.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.07.002</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Yamaguchi et al.(2010)Yamaguchi, Katsushima, Sato, and Kumakura</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yamaguchi, S., Katsushima, T., Sato, A., and Kumakura, T.:
Water retention curve of snow with different grain sizes, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 64, 87–93, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.05.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.05.008</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Yamaguchi et al.(2012)Yamaguchi, Watanabe, Katsushima, Sato, and Kumakura</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yamaguchi, S., Watanabe, K., Katsushima, T., Sato, A., and Kumakura, T.:
Dependence of the water retention curve of snow on snow characteristics, Ann. Glaciology, 53, 6–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012AoG61A001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2012AoG61A001</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Yamaguchi et al.(2025)Yamaguchi, Adachi, and Sunako</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yamaguchi, S., Adachi, S., and Sunako, S.:
A novel method to visualize liquid distribution in snow: superimposition of MRI and X-ray CT images, Ann. Glaciology, 65, e11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.77" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.77</a>, 2025.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Yen(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yen, Y.-C.:
Review of thermal properties of snow, ice, and sea ice, vol. 81, US Army, Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, <a href="https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA103734.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 April 2026), 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Zhang et al.(2025)Zhang, Liang, Zhang, Wang, Yang, Chen, Tang, Pei, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Q., Liang, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, D., Yang, J., Chen, Y., Tang, L., Pei, X., and Zhou, B.:
Numerical study of side boundary effects in pore-scale digital rock flow simulations, Fluids, 10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10120305" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10120305</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
