<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-19-4487-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Numerical modeling of ice detachment tipping processes:  insights from the Sedongpu Glacier, southeastern Tibetan Plateau</article-title><alt-title>Glacier detachment modeling</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Tong</given-names></name>
          <email>tzhang@bnu.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          <email>yangww@itpcas.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Yuzhe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Chuanxi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>Qingyun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Cunde</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Disaster Risk Reduction, Faculty of Geographical Science,  Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER),  Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan,  250014, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan, 250001, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Tong Zhang (tzhang@bnu.edu.cn) and Wei Yang (yangww@itpcas.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>13</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>4487</fpage><lpage>4498</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>February</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4</day><month>August</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>August</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Tong Zhang et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e154">Glacier detachment is a severe natural hazard that can cause enormous damage in downstream regions. During detachment, a glacier will experience an abrupt change from slow-moving to high-speed flow within minutes. In this study, we investigate a massive glacier detachment event that occurred in 2018 in the Sedongpu Valley, southeastern Tibet, using a two-dimensional first-order ice flow model incorporating a positive feedback mechanism between ice stiffness and basal slip. In this model, detachment can be triggered if the ice stress exceeds the initial yield strength of glacier ice. By including this tipping mechanism, we simulate abrupt changes in the ice flow pattern of the Sedongpu Glacier. The transition from slow to abrupt flow occurs after most regions of the glacier reach a plastic state. The modeled duration of the 2018 Sedongpu detachment is comparable with observations. The abrupt weakening of ice strength during the transition from elastic to plastic deformation may be a primary cause of glacier detachment tipping processes.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding-source>
<award-id>2023YFF0805200</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42271133</award-id>
<award-id>42271134</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e166">Glacier avalanche/detachment is one of the most catastrophic natural disasters in mountainous regions and serves as clear evidence of tipping elements in the cryosphere. Recent global warming trends have intensified, increasing glacier instability and the probability of ice avalanche/detachment events, thereby posing significant risks to downstream populations and infrastructure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.1"/>. For example, in the 1950s, Zelongnong and Guxianggou ice avalanches caused river-blocking disasters in Tibet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.2"/>. In 1962, Peru's Huascarán ice avalanche and subsequent debris flow devastated the Andes Mountains <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.3"/>. In 2002, Russia's Kolka ice avalanche triggered a mudslide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.4"/>. Between 2009 and 2016, ice avalanche-rockfall events on the Siachen Glacier, Himalaya, resulted in fatalities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.5"/>. In 2016, a massive twin-glacier collapse occurred in Aru, Tibet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.6"/>. Most notably, in October 2018, the Sedongpu Glacier detached, releasing nearly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">130</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<sup>3</sup> of ice-debris mass and blocking the Yarlung Tsangpo River for two days, which threatened downstream regions (including Bangladesh) with flooding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e215">However, the dynamic mechanism underlying ice avalanche/detachment remains unclear. Previously, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.8"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.9"/> concluded that–among a combination of climatological, glaciological, and geomorphological triggers – deformable beds and changes in basal friction were key factors responsible for the Aru ice avalanches. Subsequently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.10"/> used seismic wave observations to estimate glacier motion parameters and simulate the Aru avalanche's extent. Nevertheless, a clear and in-depth physical and numerical explanation for the abrupt transient behavior of glacier detachment is still lacking. This gap presents a significant challenge in developing effective early warning systems for damage control and risk management.</p>
      <p id="d2e227">Previously, a well-studied fracture criterion that defines relationships between material strength and applied stresses has been widely applied in glaciology to model ice fracture and iceberg calving, as well as in studies of ice flow mechanics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.11"/>. Most numerical ice flow models adopt a stress threshold approach, where fracture occurs when stresses exceed a critical value <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.12"/>, though alternative methods like pressure or strain thresholds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.13"/> remain less utilized. Despite laboratory benchmarks, natural system observations to validate fracture criteria and stress thresholds remain scarce.</p>
      <p id="d2e239">Glacier fracture and damage significantly accelerate ice flow by structurally weakening ice and reducing its effective bulk viscosity, as observed in Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers where upstream fracturing correlates with flow acceleration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.14"/>. This damage interacts with basal slip – where ice slides over bedrock – through stress redistribution that enhances basal crevassing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.15"/> and by facilitating meltwater penetration, which reduces basal friction and further accelerates slip <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.16"/>. Consequently, damage evolution is critical for projecting long-term ice flow changes and land ice stability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.17"/>, though model uncertainties persist regarding damage parameters and feedback mechanisms.</p>
      <p id="d2e255">To further our understanding of the glacier detachment mechanism, we study the 2018 Sedongpu glacier detachment in this paper. Firstly, we describe the environmental conditions of the study site. Then, we introduce the numerical model methods we used, where a novel ice stiffness-basal slip positive feedback coupling scheme is implemented, following by the results and discussions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Study region</title>
      <p id="d2e266">The study area (Sedongpu Glacier) is situated within the Namcha Barwa-Gyala Peri massif in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a), characterized by several distinctive features, including high tectonic activity, significant variations in topography and deep incisions caused by the Yarlung Tsangpo River. The Indian summer monsoon penetrates through the Yarlung Tsangpo Canyon, resulting in the longest annual rainy season on the Tibetan Plateau <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.18"/>. In 2019–2020, the Medog County, located about 60 km from the Sedongpu Valley, received over 1200 mm of precipitation, with 56.6 % occurring from June to September and 32.4 % in the spring season (March–May) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.19"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e279">The location of Sedongpu valley and the glacier distribution around Namcha Barwa Mt. and Gyala Peri Mt. <bold>(a)</bold> High-resolution DEMs generated from the stereo optical satellite images in November 2015 <bold>(b)</bold> and December 2018 <bold>(c)</bold> showing the surface and bed topography before and after the glacier detachment in 2018. The DEM difference between 2015 and 2018 can be seen in <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e300">As a result, the abundant monsoonal rainfall has led to the presence of 141 modern temperate glaciers in the Namcha Barwa-Gyala Peri region. Additionally, the accumulation of thick Quaternary glacial deposits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.20"/>, along with these unique climatic, and topographic conditions have historically resulted in significant natural disasters and river blockages <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.21"/>. The Sedongpu Glacier was underlain by a thick sediment/moraine layer which was eroded during the 2018 detachment event, forming a canyon up to 300 m deep <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.22"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e314">According to the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI) 6.0, the Sedongpu valley is home to five major glaciers. The largest of these is the Sedongpu Glacier (RGI60-13.01428), covering an area of 5.0 km<sup>2</sup>, the majority of which detached in October 2018 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.23"/>. The glacier surface is heavily covered with debris, while the underlying bedrock primarily consists of Proterozoic marble and gneiss <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.24"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Datasets</title>
      <p id="d2e340">We generated two high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) using commercial stereo optical satellite images: a 1 m-resolution SPOT6 image captured on 13 November  2015, and a 0.5 m-resolution Pleiades-1A image captured on 30 December 2018. These images were processed in PCI Geomatica software (Banff Service Pack 4) with the OrthoEngine module. The ice below 4300 m a.s.l. of Sedongpu Glacier was completely detached in October 2018, exposing the underlying bed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.25"/>. Therefore, the December 2018 DEM represents the bed topography, and the November 2015 DEM is assumed to represent the surface topography. The final DEM difference products had a relative mean vertical accuracy of 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2 m from November 2015 to December 2018 over stable flat ground inside the Sedongpu valley (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>a).</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e357">Ice surface elevation changes during 2015–2018 <bold>(a)</bold>. Ice surface mean speed from June to September 2018, prior to the ice detachment occurrence <bold>(b)</bold>. The solid black curve represents the center flowline we use in this study.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e372">We estimated local ice thickness by calculating elevation differences between the pre-detachment glacier surface and the post-detachment exposed bed topography at locations where substantial ice detachment occurred. These values provided first-order estimates of ice thickness and were used as discrete constraints in the GlaTE software <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.26"/>, which infers distributed ice thickness by optimally combining observational data with glaciological modeling in an inversion framework. The modeling component follows the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.27"/>, which approximates basal shear stress as a function of surface slope and apparent mass balance under a shallow-ice assumption. The inversion is formulated as a linear optimization problem with smoothness regularization, implemented via a smoothing matrix to enforce structural simplicity in the solution. We provided the estimated thickness points, a DEM, and the glacier outline as inputs to GlaTE. After obtaining the distributed ice thickness, we extracted the glacier geometry along the main centerline, which was generated following the method proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.28"/>. This flowline geometry was then used as input for the PoLIM simulations.</p>
      <p id="d2e385">We generated a spatially distributed estimate of XY surface displacements by applying a Normalized Cross Correlation algorithm to two phases of 3 m Planet Labs optical satellite data in daily resolution (5 June 2018 and 18 September 2018) using ImGRAFT <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.29"/> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b). A search window of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 pixels (30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 m) was used to compute the magnitude and directions of the displacement vectors. Surface velocities greater than 400 cm d<sup>−1</sup> were considered as noise and were filtered out, we interpolated the velocity values in the data gaps using cubic spline interpolation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.30"/>. The uncertainty of surface velocity was obtained by calculating the mean displacement (5.26 m; 5.01 cm d<sup>−1</sup>) from the non-glacial test areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Model descriptions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Ice flow model</title>
      <p id="d2e450">In this study, we use a two-dimensional high-order ice flow model named as PoLIM (Polythermal Land Ice Model) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.31"/>. PoLIM is developed according to the hydrostatic approximation, where the horizontal gradient of the vertical velocity is neglected in the viscous rheology and momentum equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.32"/>. The momentum conservation equation of PoLIM is given by: 

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M9" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the streamline direction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the transverse direction, and both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes lie in the horizontal plane, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the vertical direction, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the surface elevation of the glacier. In addition, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the ice density (set as a constant), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the acceleration due to gravity. Finally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the component of the deviatoric stress tensor, which can be calculated from the strain rate

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M19" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the corresponding strain-rate components, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>  is the effective viscosity, calculated as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M22" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the flow law exponent and the effective strain rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M25" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Then the effective stress (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be calculated by

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Sedongpu Glacier is a typical maritime glacier in southeastern Tibet. In this study, we assume Sedongpu Glacier is temperate and set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a constant for ice temperature close to 0 °C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.33"/> (Table 1), i.e., we do not include a temperature solver in our model. At the glacier surface, we use a stress-free boundary condition, and at the glacier base, we apply a linear friction law prior to the occurrence of glacier detachment,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M29" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the basal stress, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the basal sliding speed, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the basal friction parameter. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is hold constant in time before detachment. The glacier evolution is described by the mass continuity equation,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M34" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is ice thickness, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is model time, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is depth-averaged velocity, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is surface mass balance.</p>
      <p id="d2e1121">The model applies a finite difference discretization method. We set model time step to 0.5 s, and set  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0 given a very short model time span (25 min) in this study. We use a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 20 vertical layers in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with a terrain-following coordinate. By these numerical settings, our model can satisfy the Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) condition and keep numerical stability during forward runs. All model constants and parameters can be found in Table 1. Note that the values of critical strain and intact strength are from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.34"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1166">From the model descriptions above, we can see that glacier movement consists of two components: internal deformation and basal sliding. Internal deformation is influenced by ice viscosity. Decreased viscosity lead to increased ice flow. The basal sliding is controlled by the friction at ice-bed interface. Factors such as soft sediments and basal meltwater lubrication will reduce the basal friction, consequently accelerating ice flow, which are not considered separately but taken as a result of changing basal frictions in the sliding law in this study.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1173">Model parameters and constants used in our experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Symbol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Units</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ice density</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">910</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">kg m<sup>−3</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">gravitational constant of acceleration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">m s<sup>−2</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">flow law exponent</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">rate factor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−24</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pa<sup>−<italic>n</italic></sup> s<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">critical strain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">intact strength of ice</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pa</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">step-size parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">model time step</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">s</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Model initialization prior to detachment</title>
      <p id="d2e1468">Before simulating the Sedongpu detachment processes, we need to initialize the ice flow model using observed ice surface velocity data. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.35"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.36"/>, we solve the basal friction coefficient  using the Robin inversion algorithm by iteratively minimizing the cost function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> across the basal domain

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M59" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the observed ice surface velocity and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ice surface velocity solved in the model by applying a stress-free surface boundary condition. This cost function represents the mismatch between the Neumann and Dirichlet velocity fields. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.37"/>, the basal friction coefficient was updated as follows,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the basal friction at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th iteration step, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are basal velocity for Neumann and Dirichlet iterations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a positive parameter that determines the step size, given as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M68" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a positive parameter, as given in Table 1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Yield strength and basal slip coupling scheme</title>
      <p id="d2e1802">The overall model framework can be seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>. In order to simulate the tipping mechanism of Sedongpu detachment, we implement a numerical scheme that couples basal slip and ice stiffness, following the approach in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.38"/>, which integrates the continuum and discrete processes of ice flow. In this scheme, the new ice viscosity is calculated as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">new</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the viscosity for Glen's power law creep flow (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the viscosity for diffusion creep and plastic deformation when ice failure occurs (see the supplementary materials in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="altparen.39"/>), respectively.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a tunable minimum viscosity for numerical stability. The inclusion of the viscosity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the fracture process indicates that stress does not increase with increasing strain when the ice mass reaches the yield stress.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1929">The flow diagram of the numerical modeling procedures in this study.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1938">The presence of a “plastic” viscosity results in a low stiffness value and high velocity, as the ice viscosity remains relatively low. This phase corresponds to the development of ice crevasses and prevalent ice failure in reality.  Additionally, the yield strength is not stable and constant; it decreases with the acceleration of ice flow, resulting in an unstable ice flow pattern <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.40"/>,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the yield strength of ice, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the intact strength (see Table 1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a tunable, prescribed minimum yield stress, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the critical strain, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the plastic strain accumulated in faults and fractures which can be calculated during the model run. For the basal sliding law, we also consider the impact of yield strength of basal ice, similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.41"/>,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M82" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are basal stress and speed, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the basal friction we use before the detachment. Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ice yield stress at the bed, representing interactions between basal ice and soft till, i.e., basal ice stress will continue to decrease if it exceeds yield strength. With this improvement, basal slip is enhanced as ice failure increases and basal ice strength decreases. Therefore, this mechanism can better capture the dynamics of the soft and thick till layer underneath Sedongpu glacier, which could deform significantly during detachment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.42"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2163">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>, we present a diagram of our numerical modeling processes. In traditional ice flow models (e.g., Glen's flow law), increased stress enhances viscosity during the elastic deformation phase, promoting slow and stable ice motion. However, basal sliding formulations (e.g., the Weertman sliding law) relate basal friction to velocity and stress while neglecting ice stiffness. This limitation hinders the simulation of ice detachment processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e2168">The proposed model framework incorporates the plastic phase of ice flow by introducing a yield stress tipping point, establishing two positive feedback mechanisms: (1) within internal ice deformation and (2) at the ice-bed interface. We first initialize the ice flow model and compute stresses during forward simulations. These stresses are then compared to the ice yield strength. When stress reaches this threshold, ice stiffness and yield strength decrease, triggering further yielding and increasing glacier vulnerability. Then, reduced basal ice stiffness lowers basal friction, facilitating accelerated sliding. This dual process creates a positive feedback mechanism coupling ice stiffness and basal slip.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Model results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Sedongpu detachment simulation</title>
      <p id="d2e2188">As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, we inverted for the basal sliding coefficient of Sedongpu Glacier. The 2018 Sedongpu Glacier detachment occurred on 17 October. Prior to this event, several ice-rock avalanches in the glacier's upper region between June 2014 and October 2017 increased flow velocity from around 0.3 m d<sup>−1</sup> in 2017 to 25 m d<sup>−1</sup> by September 2018 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.43"/>. Due to insufficient high-resolution observations, it is difficult to accurately simulate the glacier's acceleration during this period. Therefore, to model the 2018 detachment, we initialize our simulation using the 2015–2018 mean observed ice velocity preceding the event. The results show faster flow in upstream regions with lower basal friction (likely due to steeper slopes), while downstream regions exhibit slower motion where greater ice thickness corresponds to higher basal friction.</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2222">The The comparison of observed and modeled surface speed after inversion <bold>(a)</bold>, and the inverted basal sliding parameter using the Robin inversion algorithm <bold>(b)</bold>. The inversion is based on velocities observed by remote sensing from 2015 to 2018.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2237">Environmental forcings may have acted as external triggers for the 2018 Sedongpu detachment. From January to October 2018, the region experienced a historical mean temperature increase rate of 0.039 K yr<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.44"/>. Although precipitation during this period was below historical observations, intense rainfall occurred 2–4 d before the detachment event. This rainfall likely softened basal ice and accelerated flow, altering internal ice dynamics and ultimately triggering the abrupt collapse.</p>
      <p id="d2e2257">As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>, our simulation successfully reproduces the decrease in ice thickness and increase in ice velocity associated with a glacier detachment. We activated the yield strength and stiffness-slip coupling mechanism at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min after confirming model stability pre-detachment, then ran the simulation for 25 min. Within several time steps, the bulk viscosity of the glacier decreased to its minimum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), significantly enhancing ice fluidity. Consequently, ice velocity surged from less than 1 m h<sup>−1</sup> to around 90 000 m h<sup>−1</sup>, with a mean speed of approximately 34 000 m h<sup>−1</sup> over the 25 min simulation period. As the glacier rapidly thinned due to mass loss, velocity stabilized at lower values, reaching a new steady state.</p>

      <fig id="F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2327">The transient changes of mean ice thickness, viscosity <bold>(a)</bold>, ice speed and effective stress <bold>(b)</bold> in time for the Sedongpu glacier during a 25 min model run. The detachment begins at minute 5. All variables here are shown in their normalized form in time.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2342">The mean effective stress in Sedongpu Glacier increased drastically from 200 kPa pre-detachment to around 1000 kPa during detachment acceleration. Generally, higher ice flow velocities result in greater englacial stresses, increasing the vulnerability of ice regions to detachment instability. During the simulation, rapid mass transfer from upstream to downstream reduced glacier thickness by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % within 6.3 min and 90 % within 11 min after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). Post-collapse oscillations in velocity and stress arise from our prescribed minimum ice thickness (1 m) and the internal numerical instability, an artificial constraint that creates non-smooth thickness distributions and corresponding fluctuations. Our modeled detachment duration (6.7 min) and mean velocity (approximately 20 m s<sup>−1</sup>, i.e., 72 000 m h<sup>−1</sup>) align closely with estimates for the 17 October 2018 event from a previous study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.45"/>. This validation is further strengthened by seismic data indicating a 5 min detachment duration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.46"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Model sensitivity</title>
      <p id="d2e2408">In this study, we assume a spatially uniform yield strength at model initialization (hereafter defined as “initial yield strength”) across Sedongpu Glacier. The initial yield strength is a crucial parameter that determines abrupt glacier detachment. As it typically varies between 100–1000 kPa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.47"/>, we conducted sensitivity experiments to assess its impact on glacier dynamics. This allows us to estimate the destabilizing threshold (tipping point) for Sedongpu Glacier. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a shows cases with initial yield strengths between 300 and 500 kPa. Detachment occurs only when the initial yield strength is set below 440 kPa, indicating that the mechanical properties of glacier ice control sudden collapse when failure exceeds critical thresholds. While subglacial hydrology-ice dynamics coupling can explain glacier surge mechanisms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.48"/>, it cannot reproduce extreme detachment instability without accounting for dramatic ice weakening. This is demonstrated by cases with initial yield strengths above 450 kPa in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a, where glacier ice remains intact throughout the simulation.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2423">The sensitivity of mean ice thickness changes of Sedongpu to different initial yield stress values <bold>(a)</bold>, model parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold> during the 25 min model time span. The detachment begins at minute 5. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis indicates the normalized value of mean ice thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) along the flowline.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2495">Additionally, the rate of ice loss can be significantly influenced by two tuning parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (prescribed minimum yield stress) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (prescibed minimum viscosity) (Eqs. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E12"/>), the choice of model parameters, in our model. These parameters determine the maximum ice flow fluidity and thus can greatly impact the rate of mass loss during detachment. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>b, for the same initial yield stress value (300 kPa), a combination of lower minimum stress (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and minimum viscosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values leads to a greater reduction in glacier mass. However, this does not change the tipping point of glacier collapse, which is determined by ice flow dynamics and mechanical properties. Once some ice regions yield, the yield strength further decreases, making the glacier even more vulnerable to fracturing. Consequently, this plastic, accelerating ice flow quickly affects the entire glacier, leading to drastic detachment.</p>
      <p id="d2e2551">We should note that the yield strength of glacier ice is generally an unknown parameter and is highly heterogeneous in space. In this study, we approximate this tipping threshold value as a spatially uniform constant for the convenience of explaining the critical role ice strength plays in glacier detachment. The positive feedback between the weakening of ice stress beyond yield strength and the rate-weakening basal friction likely contributed together to the collapse of the Sedongpu Glacier in 2018.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>The tipping processes of Sedongpu detachment</title>
      <p id="d2e2562">We can gain further insight into the detachment mechanism from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>, which shows the dynamic changes of Sedongpu Glacier at three subsequent time steps after activating the stiffness-slip coupling mechanism at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. When the initial yield strength is set to 300 kPa, the ice stress exceeds the yield strength near the glacier's head, terminus, and around km 1.3 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. By the next time step, the ice stress across the entire glacier surpasses the yield strength, resulting in whole plastic deformation and a significant acceleration of ice flow.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e2591">The changes of Sedongpu glacier velocity at 4 time steps after the ice stiffness-basal slip coupling mechanism is triggered. <bold>(a, b, c, d)</bold> Initial yield strength is set as 300 kPa; <bold>(e, f, g, h)</bold> initial yield strength is set as 430 kPa; <bold>(i, j, k, l)</bold> initial yield strength is set as 500 kPa. The red triangles indicate the locations where ice stress exceeds yield strength. The panels with “All plastic” indicate that the entire glacier is across the tipping points of yield strength and having plastic deformation with a drastic speed acceleration. The colorbars show the ice speed of Sedongpu Glacier with the unit of m yr<sup>−1</sup>. The rapid transition to plastic flow occurs for low initial yield strengths.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2621">However, when the initial yield strength is increased to 430 and 500 kPa, the plastic deformation regions near the head and terminus disappear after updating the velocity and ice thickness in the following two time steps. At 430 kPa, the entire glacier is in plastic deformation by the third time step, and the ice velocity surges dramatically to nearly 100 000 m h<sup>−1</sup>, indicating glacier detachment. In contrast, at 500 kPa, the glacier remains stable over the next three time steps.</p>
      <p id="d2e2637">Previous studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.49"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.50"/> conducted in-depth analyses of the 2016 Aru Glacier collapse, revealing that the catastrophic event was controlled by multiple factors, including a deformable substrate, increased driving stress, temperate ice conditions, and connections to subglacial water. The transition from slow ice movement to catastrophic instability may have developed over months or even years before the collapse. In this study, we focus on the dynamic instability during abrupt glacier detachment – a process that can occur within minutes. We argue that the transition from elastic to plastic ice deformation likely plays a non-negligible role in this rapid phase. Once ice stress exceeds the yield strength, a tipping point is reached, triggering localized acceleration that abruptly propagates across the entire glacier. This leads to highly fractured ice geometry within seconds to minutes. Such a mechanism creates a positive feedback mechanism of accelerating ice flow and strength reduction – a process traditionally not fully considered in numerical glacier flow simulations.</p>
      <p id="d2e2646">This glacier detachment tipping mechanism may also apply to other high-risk glaciers surrounding the Sedongpu Valley. For example, the Zelongnong Glacier (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a) represents a potential candidate for future detachment events. By assuming dynamic characteristics similar to Sedongpu (e.g., comparable initial yield strength), we could assess Zelongnong's detachment risk through surface velocity monitoring and numerical simulations of its internal stress regime. Implementing such an approach would require detailed investigations of glacier geometry to establish a reliable ice flow model and develop an effective early warning system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e2659">Similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.51"/>, our modeling approach is still based on the Glen’s flow law framework but incorporates a novel stiffness-basal slip coupling scheme. While we assume constant ice density during detachment, this simplification may limit the model’s ability to fully capture the dynamics of Sedongpu Glacier's highly fractured detachment. The continuum modeling scheme we employ <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.52"/> simultaneously accounts for ice flow and failure, though it cannot fully replicate discrete methods in simulating ice collapse processes. In addition, our bed elevation extraction – based on pre- and post-detachment geometry comparisons – introduces potential uncertainties. These arise from the soft basal sediment characteristics of Sedongpu Glacier <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.53"/> and possible subglacial geometry alterations during detachment.</p>
      <p id="d2e2671">Furthermore, our model does not incorporate thermal coupling or basal hydrology schemes, potentially neglecting key physical mechanisms involved in glacier detachment. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.54"/> identified a velocity-strengthening-weakening transition that governs surge initiation, though their framework assumes intact ice and slow movement–conditions that may not adequately capture rapid detachment dynamics. While we acknowledge the importance of ice-bed interactions with basal hydrology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.55"/>, our current implementation employs a simplified sliding law (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>) to couple basal till strength with ice flow. This approach, though computationally efficient, could be enhanced in future work to better represent these complex processes.</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e2684">The spatio-temporal changes of the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (unitless). The detachment instability mechanism is triggered at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5 min). The white circles mark the initial occurrence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> after detachment begins. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/4487/2025/tc-19-4487-2025-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2766"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.56"/> analyzed the force balance of simplified, slab geometries and marked Sedongpu Glacier as instable. In fact, for stable glaciers with basal cavities, basal drag is constrained by an upper limit known as Iken's bound <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.57"/>,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M115" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>⩽</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the basal shear stress, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the effective pressure and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximum value of the up-glacier-facing slopes of obstacles. Here we assume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the overburden ice pressure (no basal water pressure) and set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the maximum bed slope. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> shows that once the detachment instability mechanism is triggered at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upstream region of Sedongpu Glacier rapidly exceeds 1 (violating Iken's bound), which aligns closely well with the timing of the detachment event.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e2894">Glacier detachment results from complex interactions among multiple factors, including crevasse formation, meltwater infiltration, subglacial hydrology, and basal slip properties. However, observational data limitations and current modeling constraints make it difficult to fully incorporate all these elements in numerical simulations. This study focuses on investigating key triggering mechanisms for glacier detachment, with particular emphasis on two critical aspects, including the transition process of internal stress evolution within the glacier body, and the characteristic behavior of basal sliding.</p>
      <p id="d2e2897">Our findings demonstrate that the Sedongpu Glacier's transition from slow deformation to abrupt collapse can be captured by analyzing evolving internal stress states. By incorporating critical controlling factors – particularly ice yield strength – into ice flow models, we can identify potential early warning signals of detachment. From the model results, we find that glacier ice detachment occurs when the initial yield strength drops to approximately 430 kPa, indicating that the ice's mechanical properties are critical in triggering abrupt collapse when mechanical stress exceeds critical failure thresholds.</p>
      <p id="d2e2900">To advance this study, future efforts should extend the current two-dimensional model to three dimensions and further investigate the relationships between Iken’s bound of the glacier bed and basal sliding/hydrology. By developing a more advanced numerical modeling approach, we can study glaciers in neighboring regions and estimate changes in their surface and internal ice stresses using in-situ and remote sensing observations. Subsequently, we could assess the detachment risk of surrounding glaciers, or even on a larger scale, by examining the relationships among ice stress, yield strength, surface landforms (e.g., crevasses), and basal sliding features.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e2908">The ice flow model PoLIM can be freely accessed at <uri>https://github.com/WangYuzhe/PoLIM-Polythermal-Land-Ice-Model</uri> (last access: 7 October 2025). The version for simulating Sedongpu Glacier detachment can be found at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15831881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.15831881</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.58"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e2923">The velocity and boundary data of Sedongpu Glacier can be obtained from <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15831881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.15831881</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.59"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e2935">TZ and WY conceived this study. TZ designed and constructed all model experiments. WY, YW, CZ and QL helped preparing the data of Sedongpu glacier. All authors contributed to the writing of the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e2941">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e2947">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Also, please note that this paper has not received English language copy-editing. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e2953">We thank Dr. Xin Li and Dr. Jia Li for constructive discussions on ice avalanche observations. We also thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor (Gong Cheng) for their great helps in improving this manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e2958">This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2023YFF0805200), Open Research Fund of TPESER (Grant No. TPESER202203), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42271133 and 42271134), the Beijing Normal University Talent Introduction Project of China (grant no. 12807-312232101), Basic Research Fund of CAMS (grant no. 2023Z004), and Science and Technology Projects in the Tibet Autonomous Region (grant no. XZ202401ZY0003).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e2965">This paper was edited by Gong Cheng and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Acharya et al.(2023)Acharya, Steiner, Walizada, Ali, Zakir, Caiserman, and Watanabe</label><mixed-citation>Acharya, A., Steiner, J. F., Walizada, K. M., Ali, S., Zakir, Z. H., Caiserman, A., and Watanabe, T.: Review article: Snow and ice avalanches in high mountain Asia – scientific, local and indigenous knowledge, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2569–2592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2569-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-23-2569-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Albrecht and Levermann(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Albrecht, T. and Levermann, A.: Fracture field for large-scale ice dynamics, Journal of Glaciology, 58, 165–176, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Arthern and Gudmundsson(2010)</label><mixed-citation> Arthern, R. J. and Gudmundsson, G. H.: Initialization of ice-sheet forecasts viewed as an inverse Robin problem, Journal of Glaciology, 56, 527–533, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Arthern et al.(2015)Arthern, Hindmarsh, and Williams</label><mixed-citation> Arthern, R. J., Hindmarsh, R. C., and Williams, C. R.: Flow speed within the Antarctic ice sheet and its controls inferred from satellite observations, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 120, 1171–1188, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bai and He(2020)</label><mixed-citation> Bai, X. and He, S.: Dynamic process of the massive Aru glacier collapse in Tibet, Landslides, 17, 1353–1361, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bassis et al.(2021)Bassis, Berg, Crawford, and Benn</label><mixed-citation> Bassis, J., Berg, B., Crawford, A., and Benn, D.: Transition to marine ice cliff instability controlled by ice thickness gradients and velocity, Science, 372, 1342–1344, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bassis and Ma(2015)</label><mixed-citation> Bassis, J. N. and Ma, Y.: Evolution of basal crevasses links ice shelf stability to ocean forcing, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 409, 203–211, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Bassis et al.(2024)Bassis, Crawford, Kachuck, Benn, Walker, Millstein, Duddu, Åström, Fricker, and Luckman</label><mixed-citation> Bassis, J. N., Crawford, A., Kachuck, S. B., Benn, D. I., Walker, C., Millstein, J., Duddu, R., Åström, J., Fricker, H. A., and Luckman, A.: Stability of ice shelves and ice cliffs in a changing climate, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 52, 221–247, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Berthier and Brun(2019)</label><mixed-citation> Berthier, É. and Brun, F.: Karakoram geodetic glacier mass balances between 2008 and 2016: persistence of the anomaly and influence of a large rock avalanche on Siachen Glacier, Journal of Glaciology, 65, 494–507, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Blatter(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Blatter, H.: Velocity and stress fields in grounded glaciers: a simple algorithm for including deviatoric stress gradients, Journal of Glaciology, 41, 333–344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S002214300001621X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S002214300001621X</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Borstad et al.(2016)Borstad, Khazendar, Scheuchl, Morlighem, Larour, and Rignot</label><mixed-citation> Borstad, C., Khazendar, A., Scheuchl, B., Morlighem, M., Larour, E., and Rignot, E.: A constitutive framework for predicting weakening and reduced buttressing of ice shelves based on observations of the progressive deterioration of the remnant Larsen B Ice Shelf, Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 2027–2035, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Chen et al.(2020)Chen, Zhang, Xiao, and He</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C., Zhang, L., Xiao, T., and He, J.: Barrier lake bursting and flood routing in the Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon in October 2018, Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124603</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Clarke et al.(2013)Clarke, Anslow, Jarosch, Radić, Menounos, Bolch, and Berthier</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, G. K. C., Anslow, F. S., Jarosch, A. H., Radić, V., Menounos, B., Bolch, T., and Berthier, E.: Ice Volume and Subglacial Topography for Western Canadian Glaciers from Mass Balance Fields, Thinning Rates, and a Bed Stress Model, Journal of Climate, 26, 4282–4303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00513.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00513.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Clayton et al.(2022)Clayton, Duddu, Siegert, and Martinez-Paneda</label><mixed-citation>Clayton, T., Duddu, R., Siegert, M., and Martinez-Paneda, E.: A stress-based poro-damage phase field model for hydrofracturing of creeping glaciers and ice shelves, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 272, 108693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108693" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108693</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Cuffey and Paterson(2010)</label><mixed-citation> Cuffey, K. M. and Paterson, W. S. B.: The physics of glaciers, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, ISBN 978-0-12-369461-4, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Duddu and Waisman(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Duddu, R. and Waisman, H.: A temperature dependent creep damage model for polycrystalline ice, Mechanics of Materials, 46, 23–41, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Duddu et al.(2020)Duddu, Jiménez, and Bassis</label><mixed-citation> Duddu, R., Jiménez, S., and Bassis, J.: A non-local continuum poro-damage mechanics model for hydrofracturing of surface crevasses in grounded glaciers, Journal of Glaciology, 66, 415–429, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Gilbert et al.(2018)Gilbert, Leinss, Kargel, Kääb, Gascoin, Leonard, Berthier, Karki, and Yao</label><mixed-citation>Gilbert, A., Leinss, S., Kargel, J., Kääb, A., Gascoin, S., Leonard, G., Berthier, E., Karki, A., and Yao, T.: Mechanisms leading to the 2016 giant twin glacier collapses, Aru Range, Tibet, The Cryosphere, 12, 2883–2900, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2883-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-12-2883-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Gilbert et al.(2020)Gilbert, Sinisalo, Gurung, Fujita, Maharjan, Sherpa, and Fukuda</label><mixed-citation>Gilbert, A., Sinisalo, A., Gurung, T. R., Fujita, K., Maharjan, S. B., Sherpa, T. C., and Fukuda, T.: The influence of water percolation through crevasses on the thermal regime of a Himalayan mountain glacier, The Cryosphere, 14, 1273–1288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1273-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-14-1273-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Greve and Blatter(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Greve, R. and Blatter, H.: Dynamics of Ice Sheets and Glaciers, ISBN 3642034144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03415-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-03415-2</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Helanow et al.(2020)Helanow, Iverson, Zoet, and Gagliardini</label><mixed-citation>Helanow, C., Iverson, N. R., Zoet, L. K., and Gagliardini, O.: Sliding relations for glacier slip with cavities over three-dimensional beds, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL084924, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084924" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL084924</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Helanow et al.(2021)Helanow, Iverson, Woodard, and Zoet</label><mixed-citation>Helanow, C., Iverson, N. R., Woodard, J. B., and Zoet, L. K.: A slip law for hard-bedded glaciers derived from observed bed topography, Science Advances, 7, eabe7798, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe7798" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abe7798</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Hoffman and Price(2014)</label><mixed-citation> Hoffman, M. and Price, S.: Feedbacks between coupled subglacial hydrology and glacier dynamics, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 119, 414–436, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Hu et al.(2018)Hu, Yao, Yu, Yang, and Gao</label><mixed-citation> Hu, W., Yao, T., Yu, W., Yang, W., and Gao, Y.: Advances in the study of glacier avalanches in High Asia, J. Glaciol. Geocryol, 40, 1141–1152, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Hulbe et al.(2010)Hulbe, LeDoux, and Cruikshank</label><mixed-citation> Hulbe, C. L., LeDoux, C., and Cruikshank, K.: Propagation of long fractures in the Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica, investigated using a numerical model of fracture propagation, Journal of Glaciology, 56, 459–472, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Jiménez et al.(2017)Jiménez, Duddu, and Bassis</label><mixed-citation> Jiménez, S., Duddu, R., and Bassis, J.: An updated-Lagrangian damage mechanics formulation for modeling the creeping flow and fracture of ice sheets, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 313, 406–432, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Kääb and Girod(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Kääb, A. and Girod, L.: Brief communication: Rapid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 335 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>6</sup> m<sup>3</sup> bed erosion after detachment of the Sedongpu Glacier (Tibet), The Cryosphere, 17, 2533–2541, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2533-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-17-2533-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Kääb et al.(2018)Kääb, Leinss, Gilbert, Bühler, Gascoin, Evans, Bartelt, Berthier, Brun, Chao, Farinotti, Gimbert, Guo, Huggel, Kargel, Leonard, Tian, Treichler, and Yao</label><mixed-citation> Kääb, A., Leinss, S., Gilbert, A., Bühler, Y., Gascoin, S., Evans, S. G., Bartelt, P., Berthier, E., Brun, F., Chao, W.-A., Farinotti, D., Gimbert, F., Guo, W., Huggel, C., Kargel, J. S., Leonard, G. J., Tian, L., Treichler, D., and Yao, T.: Massive collapse of two glaciers in western Tibet in 2016 after surge-like instability, Nature Geoscience, 11, 114–120, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Kääb et al.(2021)Kaeaeb, Jacquemart, Gilbert, Leinss, Girod, Huggel, Falaschi, Ugalde, Petrakov, Chernomorets, Dokukin, Paul, Gascoin, Berthier, and Kargel</label><mixed-citation>Kääb, A., Jacquemart, M., Gilbert, A., Leinss, S., Girod, L., Huggel, C., Falaschi, D., Ugalde, F., Petrakov, D., Chernomorets, S., Dokukin, M., Paul, F., Gascoin, S., Berthier, E., and Kargel, J. S.: Sudden large-volume detachments of low-angle mountain glaciers – more frequent than thought?, The Cryosphere, 15, 1751–1785, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1751-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-15-1751-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Kienholz et al.(2014)Kienholz, Rich, Arendt, and Hock</label><mixed-citation>Kienholz, C., Rich, J. L., Arendt, A. A., and Hock, R.: A new method for deriving glacier centerlines applied to glaciers in Alaska and northwest Canada, The Cryosphere, 8, 503–519, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-503-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-503-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Kotlyakov et al.(2004)Kotlyakov, Rototaeva, and Nosenko</label><mixed-citation> Kotlyakov, V. M., Rototaeva, O., and Nosenko, G.: The September 2002 Kolka glacier catastrophe in North Ossetia, Russian Federation: evidence and analysis, Mountain Research and Development, 24, 78–83, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Langhammer et al.(2019)Langhammer, Grab, Bauder, and Maurer</label><mixed-citation>Langhammer, L., Grab, M., Bauder, A., and Maurer, H.: Glacier thickness estimations of alpine glaciers using data and modeling constraints, The Cryosphere, 13, 2189–2202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2189-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-13-2189-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Lhermitte et al.(2020)Lhermitte, Sun, Shuman, Wouters, Pattyn, Wuite, Berthier, and Nagler</label><mixed-citation> Lhermitte, S., Sun, S., Shuman, C., Wouters, B., Pattyn, F., Wuite, J., Berthier, E., and Nagler, T.: Damage accelerates ice shelf instability and mass loss in Amundsen Sea Embayment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 24735–24741, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Li et al.(2022)Li, Zhao, Xu, Scaringi, Lu, and Huang</label><mixed-citation>Li, W., Zhao, B., Xu, Q., Scaringi, G., Lu, H., and Huang, R.: More frequent glacier-rock avalanches in Sedongpu gully are blocking the Yarlung Zangbo River in eastern Tibet, Landslides, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01798-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10346-021-01798-z</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Liu et al.(2019)Liu, Lü, Tong, Chen, Liu, Xiao, and Tu</label><mixed-citation> Liu, C., Lü, J., Tong, L., Chen, H., Liu, Q., Xiao, R., and Tu, J.: Research on glacial/rock fall-landslide-debris flows in Sedongpu basin along Yarlung Zangbo River in Tibet, Geology in China, 46, 219–234, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Messerli and Grinsted(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Messerli, A. and Grinsted, A.: Image georectification and feature tracking toolbox: ImGRAFT, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 4, 23–34, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-23-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gi-4-23-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Mishra et al.(2022)Mishra, Miles, Chaudhuri, Mainali, Mal, Singh, and Tiruwa</label><mixed-citation> Mishra, N. B., Miles, E. S., Chaudhuri, G., Mainali, K. P., Mal, S., Singh, P. B., and Tiruwa, B.: Quantifying heterogeneous monsoonal melt on a debris-covered glacier in Nepal Himalaya using repeat uncrewed aerial system (UAS) photogrammetry, Journal of Glaciology, 68, 288–304, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Montgomery et al.(2004)Montgomery, Hallet, Yuping, Finnegan, Anders, Gillespie, and Greenberg</label><mixed-citation> Montgomery, D. R., Hallet, B., Yuping, L., Finnegan, N., Anders, A., Gillespie, A., and Greenberg, H. M.: Evidence for Holocene megafloods down the Tsangpo River gorge, southeastern Tibet, Quaternary Research, 62, 201–207, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Pattyn(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Pattyn, F.: Transient glacier response with a higher-order numerical ice-flow model, Journal of Glaciology, 48, 467–477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756502781831278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756502781831278</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Pralong and Funk(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Pralong, A. and Funk, M.: Dynamic damage model of crevasse opening and application to glacier calving, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JB003104</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Salzmann et al.(2004)Salzmann, Kääb, Huggel, Allgöwer, and Haeberli</label><mixed-citation> Salzmann, N., Kääb, A., Huggel, C., Allgöwer, B., and Haeberli, W.: Assessment of the hazard potential of ice avalanches using remote sensing and GIS-modelling, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 58, 74–84, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Sun and Gudmundsson(2023)</label><mixed-citation> Sun, S. and Gudmundsson, G. H.: The speedup of Pine Island Ice Shelf between 2017 and 2020: revaluating the importance of ice damage, Journal of Glaciology, 69, 1983–1991, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Sun et al.(2021)Sun, Duddu, and Hirshikesh</label><mixed-citation>Sun, X., Duddu, R., and Hirshikesh: A poro-damage phase field model for hydrofracturing of glacier crevasses, Extreme Mechanics Letters, 45, 101277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2021.101277" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.eml.2021.101277</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Surawy-Stepney et al.(2023)Surawy-Stepney, Hogg, Cornford, and Davison</label><mixed-citation> Surawy-Stepney, T., Hogg, A. E., Cornford, S. L., and Davison, B. J.: Episodic dynamic change linked to damage on the Thwaites Glacier Ice Tongue, Nature Geoscience, 16, 37–43, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Thøgersen et al.(2019)Thøgersen, Gilbert, Schuler, and Malthe-Sørenssen</label><mixed-citation>Thøgersen, K., Gilbert, A., Schuler, T. V., and Malthe-Sørenssen, A.: Rate-and-state friction explains glacier surge propagation, Nature communications, 10, 2823, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10506-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-10506-4</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Wang et al.(2018)Wang, Zhang, Ren, Qin, Liu, Sun, Chen, Ding, Du, and Qin</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Zhang, T., Ren, J., Qin, X., Liu, Y., Sun, W., Chen, J., Ding, M., Du, W., and Qin, D.: An investigation of the thermomechanical features of Laohugou Glacier No. 12 on Qilian Shan, western China, using a two-dimensional first-order flow-band ice flow model, The Cryosphere, 12, 851–866, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-851-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-12-851-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Wang et al.(2020)Wang, Zhang, Xiao, Ren, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Zhang, T., Xiao, C., Ren, J., and Wang, Y.: A two-dimensional, higher-order, enthalpy-based thermomechanical ice flow model for mountain glaciers and its benchmark experiments, Computers &amp; Geosciences, 141, 104526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104526" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104526</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Yang et al.(2013)Yang, Yao, Guo, Zhu, Li, and Kattel</label><mixed-citation> Yang, W., Yao, T., Guo, X., Zhu, M., Li, S., and Kattel, D. B.: Mass balance of a maritime glacier on the southeast Tibetan Plateau and its climatic sensitivity, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118, 9579–9594, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Yang et al.(2023)Yang, Wang, An, Chen, Zhao, Li, Wang, Wang, Li, Wu, Bai, Zhang, and Yao</label><mixed-citation>Yang, W., Wang, Z., An, B., Chen, Y., Zhao, C., Li, C., Wang, Y., Wang, W., Li, J., Wu, G., Bai, L., Zhang, F., and Yao, T.: Early warning system for ice collapses and river blockages in the Sedongpu Valley, southeastern Tibetan Plateau, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3015–3029, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3015-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-23-3015-2023</ext-link>, 2023. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Yao and An(2022)</label><mixed-citation> Yao, T. and An, B.: Scientific Assessment Report on the Great Bend of the Brahmaputra River Ice Collapse and River Blocking Event, Vol. 52, Science Press, ISBN 9787030723765, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Zhang et al.(2013)Zhang, Xiao, Colgan, Qin, Du, Sun, Liu, and Ding</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, T., Xiao, C., Colgan, W., Qin, X., Du, W., Sun, W., Liu, Y., and Ding, M.: Observed and modelled ice temperature and velocity along the main flowline of East Rongbuk Glacier, Qomolangma (Mount Everest), Himalaya, Journal of Glaciology, 59, 438–448, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J202" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2013JoG12J202</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Zhang et al.(2024)Zhang, Wang, Shen, and An</label><mixed-citation> Zhang, T., Wang, W., Shen, Z., and An, B.: Increasing frequency and destructiveness of glacier-related slope failures under global warming, Science Bulletin, 69, 30–33, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Zhang et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, T., Yang, W., Wang, Y., and Zhao, C.: Data and code for Sedongpu detachment simulation, Zenodo [code, data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15831881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.15831881</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Numerical modeling of ice detachment tipping processes:  insights from the Sedongpu Glacier, southeastern Tibetan Plateau</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Acharya et al.(2023)Acharya, Steiner, Walizada, Ali, Zakir,
Caiserman, and Watanabe</label><mixed-citation>
      
Acharya, A., Steiner, J. F., Walizada, K. M., Ali, S., Zakir, Z. H., Caiserman, A., and Watanabe, T.: Review article: Snow and ice avalanches in high mountain Asia – scientific, local and indigenous knowledge, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2569–2592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2569-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2569-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Albrecht and Levermann(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Albrecht, T. and Levermann, A.: Fracture field for large-scale ice dynamics,
Journal of Glaciology, 58, 165–176, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Arthern and Gudmundsson(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arthern, R. J. and Gudmundsson, G. H.: Initialization of ice-sheet forecasts
viewed as an inverse Robin problem, Journal of Glaciology, 56, 527–533,
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Arthern et al.(2015)Arthern, Hindmarsh, and Williams</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arthern, R. J., Hindmarsh, R. C., and Williams, C. R.: Flow speed within the
Antarctic ice sheet and its controls inferred from satellite observations,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 120, 1171–1188, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bai and He(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bai, X. and He, S.: Dynamic process of the massive Aru glacier collapse in
Tibet, Landslides, 17, 1353–1361, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bassis et al.(2021)Bassis, Berg, Crawford, and Benn</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bassis, J., Berg, B., Crawford, A., and Benn, D.: Transition to marine ice
cliff instability controlled by ice thickness gradients and velocity,
Science, 372, 1342–1344, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bassis and Ma(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bassis, J. N. and Ma, Y.: Evolution of basal crevasses links ice shelf
stability to ocean forcing, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 409,
203–211, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bassis et al.(2024)Bassis, Crawford, Kachuck, Benn, Walker,
Millstein, Duddu, Åström, Fricker, and Luckman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bassis, J. N., Crawford, A., Kachuck, S. B., Benn, D. I., Walker, C.,
Millstein, J., Duddu, R., Åström, J., Fricker, H. A., and Luckman,
A.: Stability of ice shelves and ice cliffs in a changing climate, Annual
Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 52, 221–247, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Berthier and Brun(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berthier, É. and Brun, F.: Karakoram geodetic glacier mass balances between
2008 and 2016: persistence of the anomaly and influence of a large rock
avalanche on Siachen Glacier, Journal of Glaciology, 65, 494–507, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Blatter(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blatter, H.: Velocity and stress fields in grounded glaciers: a simple
algorithm for including deviatoric stress gradients, Journal of Glaciology,
41, 333–344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S002214300001621X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S002214300001621X</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Borstad et al.(2016)Borstad, Khazendar, Scheuchl, Morlighem, Larour,
and Rignot</label><mixed-citation>
      
Borstad, C., Khazendar, A., Scheuchl, B., Morlighem, M., Larour, E., and
Rignot, E.: A constitutive framework for predicting weakening and reduced
buttressing of ice shelves based on observations of the progressive
deterioration of the remnant Larsen B Ice Shelf, Geophysical Research
Letters, 43, 2027–2035, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Chen et al.(2020)Chen, Zhang, Xiao, and He</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, C., Zhang, L., Xiao, T., and He, J.: Barrier lake bursting and flood
routing in the Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon in October 2018, Journal of
Hydrology, 583, 124603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124603" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124603</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Clarke et al.(2013)Clarke, Anslow, Jarosch, Radić, Menounos,
Bolch, and Berthier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clarke, G. K. C., Anslow, F. S., Jarosch, A. H., Radić, V., Menounos, B.,
Bolch, T., and Berthier, E.: Ice Volume and Subglacial Topography for Western
Canadian Glaciers from Mass Balance Fields, Thinning Rates, and a Bed Stress
Model, Journal of Climate, 26, 4282–4303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00513.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00513.1</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Clayton et al.(2022)Clayton, Duddu, Siegert, and
Martinez-Paneda</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clayton, T., Duddu, R., Siegert, M., and Martinez-Paneda, E.: A stress-based
poro-damage phase field model for hydrofracturing of creeping glaciers and
ice shelves, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 272, 108693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108693" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108693</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Cuffey and Paterson(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cuffey, K. M. and Paterson, W. S. B.: The physics of glaciers, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, ISBN 978-0-12-369461-4,
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Duddu and Waisman(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duddu, R. and Waisman, H.: A temperature dependent creep damage model for
polycrystalline ice, Mechanics of Materials, 46, 23–41, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Duddu et al.(2020)Duddu, Jiménez, and Bassis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duddu, R., Jiménez, S., and Bassis, J.: A non-local continuum poro-damage
mechanics model for hydrofracturing of surface crevasses in grounded
glaciers, Journal of Glaciology, 66, 415–429, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Gilbert et al.(2018)Gilbert, Leinss, Kargel, Kääb, Gascoin,
Leonard, Berthier, Karki, and Yao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gilbert, A., Leinss, S., Kargel, J., Kääb, A., Gascoin, S., Leonard, G., Berthier, E., Karki, A., and Yao, T.: Mechanisms leading to the 2016 giant twin glacier collapses, Aru Range, Tibet, The Cryosphere, 12, 2883–2900, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2883-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2883-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Gilbert et al.(2020)Gilbert, Sinisalo, Gurung, Fujita, Maharjan,
Sherpa, and Fukuda</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gilbert, A., Sinisalo, A., Gurung, T. R., Fujita, K., Maharjan, S. B., Sherpa, T. C., and Fukuda, T.: The influence of water percolation through crevasses on the thermal regime of a Himalayan mountain glacier, The Cryosphere, 14, 1273–1288, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1273-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1273-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Greve and Blatter(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Greve, R. and Blatter, H.: Dynamics of Ice Sheets and Glaciers, ISBN
3642034144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03415-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03415-2</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Helanow et al.(2020)Helanow, Iverson, Zoet, and
Gagliardini</label><mixed-citation>
      
Helanow, C., Iverson, N. R., Zoet, L. K., and Gagliardini, O.: Sliding
relations for glacier slip with cavities over three-dimensional beds,
Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL084924, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084924" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084924</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Helanow et al.(2021)Helanow, Iverson, Woodard, and
Zoet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Helanow, C., Iverson, N. R., Woodard, J. B., and Zoet, L. K.: A slip law for
hard-bedded glaciers derived from observed bed topography, Science Advances,
7, eabe7798, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe7798" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe7798</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Hoffman and Price(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoffman, M. and Price, S.: Feedbacks between coupled subglacial hydrology and
glacier dynamics, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 119,
414–436, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Hu et al.(2018)Hu, Yao, Yu, Yang, and Gao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, W., Yao, T., Yu, W., Yang, W., and Gao, Y.: Advances in the study of
glacier avalanches in High Asia, J. Glaciol. Geocryol, 40, 1141–1152, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hulbe et al.(2010)Hulbe, LeDoux, and Cruikshank</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hulbe, C. L., LeDoux, C., and Cruikshank, K.: Propagation of long fractures in
the Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica, investigated using a numerical model of
fracture propagation, Journal of Glaciology, 56, 459–472, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Jiménez et al.(2017)Jiménez, Duddu, and Bassis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiménez, S., Duddu, R., and Bassis, J.: An updated-Lagrangian damage
mechanics formulation for modeling the creeping flow and fracture of ice
sheets, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 313, 406–432,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Kääb and Girod(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kääb, A. and Girod, L.: Brief communication: Rapid  ∼ &thinsp;335&thinsp; × &thinsp;10<sup>6</sup>&thinsp;m<sup>3</sup> bed erosion after detachment of the Sedongpu Glacier (Tibet), The Cryosphere, 17, 2533–2541, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2533-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2533-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Kääb et al.(2018)Kääb, Leinss, Gilbert,
Bühler, Gascoin, Evans, Bartelt, Berthier, Brun, Chao,
Farinotti, Gimbert, Guo, Huggel, Kargel, Leonard, Tian,
Treichler, and Yao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kääb, A., Leinss, S., Gilbert, A., Bühler, Y., Gascoin,
S., Evans, S. G., Bartelt, P., Berthier, E., Brun, F., Chao, W.-A.,
Farinotti, D., Gimbert, F., Guo, W., Huggel, C., Kargel, J. S.,
Leonard, G. J., Tian, L., Treichler, D., and Yao, T.: Massive
collapse of two glaciers in western Tibet in 2016 after surge-like
instability, Nature Geoscience, 11, 114–120, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Kääb et al.(2021)Kaeaeb, Jacquemart, Gilbert, Leinss,
Girod, Huggel, Falaschi, Ugalde, Petrakov, Chernomorets,
Dokukin, Paul, Gascoin, Berthier, and Kargel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kääb, A., Jacquemart, M., Gilbert, A., Leinss, S., Girod, L., Huggel, C., Falaschi, D., Ugalde, F., Petrakov, D., Chernomorets, S., Dokukin, M., Paul, F., Gascoin, S., Berthier, E., and Kargel, J. S.: Sudden large-volume detachments of low-angle mountain glaciers – more frequent than thought?, The Cryosphere, 15, 1751–1785, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1751-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1751-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Kienholz et al.(2014)Kienholz, Rich, Arendt, and Hock</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kienholz, C., Rich, J. L., Arendt, A. A., and Hock, R.: A new method for deriving glacier centerlines applied to glaciers in Alaska and northwest Canada, The Cryosphere, 8, 503–519, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-503-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-503-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Kotlyakov et al.(2004)Kotlyakov, Rototaeva, and
Nosenko</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kotlyakov, V. M., Rototaeva, O., and Nosenko, G.: The September 2002 Kolka
glacier catastrophe in North Ossetia, Russian Federation: evidence and
analysis, Mountain Research and Development, 24, 78–83, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Langhammer et al.(2019)Langhammer, Grab, Bauder, and
Maurer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Langhammer, L., Grab, M., Bauder, A., and Maurer, H.: Glacier thickness estimations of alpine glaciers using data and modeling constraints, The Cryosphere, 13, 2189–2202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2189-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2189-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Lhermitte et al.(2020)Lhermitte, Sun, Shuman, Wouters, Pattyn, Wuite,
Berthier, and Nagler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lhermitte, S., Sun, S., Shuman, C., Wouters, B., Pattyn, F., Wuite, J.,
Berthier, E., and Nagler, T.: Damage accelerates ice shelf instability and
mass loss in Amundsen Sea Embayment, Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 117, 24735–24741, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Li et al.(2022)Li, Zhao, Xu, Scaringi, Lu, and Huang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, W., Zhao, B., Xu, Q., Scaringi, G., Lu, H., and Huang, R.: More frequent
glacier-rock avalanches in Sedongpu gully are blocking the Yarlung Zangbo
River in eastern Tibet, Landslides, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01798-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01798-z</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Liu et al.(2019)Liu, Lü, Tong, Chen, Liu, Xiao, and Tu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, C., Lü, J., Tong, L., Chen, H., Liu, Q., Xiao, R., and Tu, J.:
Research on glacial/rock fall-landslide-debris flows in Sedongpu basin along
Yarlung Zangbo River in Tibet, Geology in China, 46, 219–234, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Messerli and Grinsted(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Messerli, A. and Grinsted, A.: Image georectification and feature tracking toolbox: ImGRAFT, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 4, 23–34, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-23-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-23-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Mishra et al.(2022)Mishra, Miles, Chaudhuri, Mainali, Mal, Singh, and
Tiruwa</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mishra, N. B., Miles, E. S., Chaudhuri, G., Mainali, K. P., Mal, S., Singh,
P. B., and Tiruwa, B.: Quantifying heterogeneous monsoonal melt on a
debris-covered glacier in Nepal Himalaya using repeat uncrewed aerial system
(UAS) photogrammetry, Journal of Glaciology, 68, 288–304, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Montgomery et al.(2004)Montgomery, Hallet, Yuping, Finnegan, Anders,
Gillespie, and Greenberg</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montgomery, D. R., Hallet, B., Yuping, L., Finnegan, N., Anders, A., Gillespie,
A., and Greenberg, H. M.: Evidence for Holocene megafloods down the Tsangpo
River gorge, southeastern Tibet, Quaternary Research, 62, 201–207, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Pattyn(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pattyn, F.: Transient glacier response with a higher-order numerical ice-flow
model, Journal of Glaciology, 48, 467–477,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756502781831278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756502781831278</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Pralong and Funk(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pralong, A. and Funk, M.: Dynamic damage model of crevasse opening and
application to glacier calving, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,
110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003104</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Salzmann et al.(2004)Salzmann, Kääb, Huggel, Allgöwer,
and Haeberli</label><mixed-citation>
      
Salzmann, N., Kääb, A., Huggel, C., Allgöwer, B., and Haeberli, W.:
Assessment of the hazard potential of ice avalanches using remote sensing and
GIS-modelling, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography,
58, 74–84, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Sun and Gudmundsson(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, S. and Gudmundsson, G. H.: The speedup of Pine Island Ice Shelf between
2017 and 2020: revaluating the importance of ice damage, Journal of
Glaciology, 69, 1983–1991, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Sun et al.(2021)Sun, Duddu, and Hirshikesh</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, X., Duddu, R., and Hirshikesh: A poro-damage phase field model for
hydrofracturing of glacier crevasses, Extreme Mechanics Letters, 45,
101277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2021.101277" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2021.101277</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Surawy-Stepney et al.(2023)Surawy-Stepney, Hogg, Cornford, and
Davison</label><mixed-citation>
      
Surawy-Stepney, T., Hogg, A. E., Cornford, S. L., and Davison, B. J.: Episodic
dynamic change linked to damage on the Thwaites Glacier Ice Tongue, Nature
Geoscience, 16, 37–43, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Thøgersen et al.(2019)Thøgersen, Gilbert, Schuler, and
Malthe-Sørenssen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thøgersen, K., Gilbert, A., Schuler, T. V., and Malthe-Sørenssen, A.:
Rate-and-state friction explains glacier surge propagation, Nature
communications, 10, 2823, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10506-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10506-4</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Wang et al.(2018)Wang, Zhang, Ren, Qin, Liu, Sun, Chen, Ding, Du, and
Qin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Zhang, T., Ren, J., Qin, X., Liu, Y., Sun, W., Chen, J., Ding, M., Du, W., and Qin, D.: An investigation of the thermomechanical features of Laohugou Glacier No. 12 on Qilian Shan, western China, using a two-dimensional first-order flow-band ice flow model, The Cryosphere, 12, 851–866, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-851-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-851-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Wang et al.(2020)Wang, Zhang, Xiao, Ren, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Zhang, T., Xiao, C., Ren, J., and Wang, Y.: A two-dimensional,
higher-order, enthalpy-based thermomechanical ice flow model for mountain
glaciers and its benchmark experiments, Computers &amp; Geosciences, 141,
104526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104526" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104526</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Yang et al.(2013)Yang, Yao, Guo, Zhu, Li, and Kattel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, W., Yao, T., Guo, X., Zhu, M., Li, S., and Kattel, D. B.: Mass balance of
a maritime glacier on the southeast Tibetan Plateau and its climatic
sensitivity, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118, 9579–9594,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Yang et al.(2023)Yang, Wang, An, Chen, Zhao, Li,
Wang, Wang, Li, Wu, Bai, Zhang, and Yao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, W., Wang, Z., An, B., Chen, Y., Zhao, C., Li, C., Wang, Y., Wang, W., Li, J., Wu, G., Bai, L., Zhang, F., and Yao, T.: Early warning system for ice collapses and river blockages in the Sedongpu Valley, southeastern Tibetan Plateau, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3015–3029, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3015-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3015-2023</a>, 2023.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Yao and An(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yao, T. and An, B.: Scientific Assessment Report on the Great Bend of the
Brahmaputra River Ice Collapse and River Blocking Event, Vol. 52, Science
Press, ISBN 9787030723765, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Zhang et al.(2013)Zhang, Xiao, Colgan, Qin, Du, Sun, Liu, and
Ding</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, T., Xiao, C., Colgan, W., Qin, X., Du, W., Sun, W., Liu, Y., and Ding,
M.: Observed and modelled ice temperature and velocity along the main
flowline of East Rongbuk Glacier, Qomolangma (Mount Everest), Himalaya,
Journal of Glaciology, 59, 438–448, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J202" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J202</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Zhang et al.(2024)Zhang, Wang, Shen, and An</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, T., Wang, W., Shen, Z., and An, B.: Increasing frequency and
destructiveness of glacier-related slope failures under global warming,
Science Bulletin, 69, 30–33, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Zhang et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, T., Yang, W., Wang, Y., and Zhao, C.: Data and code for Sedongpu detachment simulation, Zenodo [code, data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15831881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15831881</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
