<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-19-3397-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Investigating seasonal and multi-decadal water/ice storage changes in the Murtèl rock glacier using time-lapse gravimetry</article-title><alt-title>Time-lapse gravimetry at Murtèl RG</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Halloran</surname><given-names>Landon J. S.</given-names></name>
          <email>landon.halloran@unine.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-5430</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Amschwand</surname><given-names>Dominik</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2179-1481</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre for Hydrogeology and Geothermics (CHYN), University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Networked Embedded Sensing Center, Department of Computer Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Landon J. S. Halloran (landon.halloran@unine.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>August</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>3397</fpage><lpage>3417</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>December</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>June</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>May</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>24</day><month>January</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Landon J. S. Halloran</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3397/2025/tc-19-3397-2025.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3397/2025/tc-19-3397-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3397/2025/tc-19-3397-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3397/2025/tc-19-3397-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e95">Rock glaciers are important features of many alpine hydrological systems. Although their seasonal release of water enhances the resilience of alpine headwater catchments to climate change, measurement of their internal water and ice storage changes remains a challenge. Recent technological and methodological advances have enabled novel applications of time-lapse gravimetry (TLG) to estimate subsurface storage changes. Here, we present the first application of TLG on a rock glacier. We measure seasonal (July–September) changes in gravity at the Murtèl rock glacier (Upper Engadine, Switzerland). We employ drone-based photogrammetry to correct for surface mass changes in the form of snow. We also compare the Bouguer anomaly of our 2024 surveys with those from a pioneering 1991 gravimetry study. The seasonal results reveal spatial differences in active layer thaw, with estimated ice storage loss ranging between 11–64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water equivalent, while the multi-decadal results suggest zonal decreases in permafrost ice storage. Our study provides new insights into rock glacier–groundwater processes and illustrates how TLG can be employed to measure cryospheric and hydrogeological processes in permafrost and periglacial landforms.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung</funding-source>
<award-id>212622</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e115">Our changing climate is imparting profound shifts to the hydrological regime of high-mountain regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.1"/>. Temperature, evaporative losses, and precipitation variability are increasing, which could lead to more frequent droughts and reduced streamflow in dry years and thus threaten downstream water security <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.2"/>. As glaciers recede <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.3"/> and precipitation in the form of snow decreases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.4"/>, the dynamics of many high-mountain regions are shifting from glacial to periglacial regimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.5"/>. In this context of reduced surface snow and ice volumes and increasing risk of precipitation deficits, the hydrological buffering capacity of belowground components, namely ice-rich mountain permafrost and groundwater <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx99" id="paren.6"/>, is becoming increasingly important for water security and ecology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx89" id="paren.7"/>. This is especially the case in water-stressed regions like semi-arid Central Asia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.8"/>, the Himalayas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.9"/>, and the Dry Andes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.10"/>, but it is also becoming increasing relevant for other rapidly changing mountain regions such as the European Alps.</p>
      <p id="d2e149">Intact rock glaciers (RGs), common in many high-mountain ranges, are ice-rich permafrost landforms that store and release water over various timescales ranging from seasonal to millennial <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.11"/>. Their thick, seasonally thawed active layer (AL) insulates the ground and slows the melting of ground ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx114 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.12"/>. This renders permafrost ice more robust against climate change than glaciers over a long, multi-decadal timescale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.13"/>. Three types of processes summarise the hydrological significance of RGs. First, seasonal storage and freeze–thaw of water/ice in the AL act as a seasonal buffer by building ground ice in autumn, winter, and spring (i.e., by trapping in-blown snow or refreezing snowmelt) and melting it during the thaw season. Second, permafrost ice in the permafrost body (beneath the AL) is slowly released due to permafrost degradation as intact (ice-bearing) RGs slowly transition towards a relict (ice-free) state. Since intact RGs are a common periglacial landform, the amount of belowground permafrost ice, as estimated from RG inventories and empirical area–volume scaling relations, is substantial <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.14"/>. Additionally, frozen talus slopes also contain ground ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.15"/>. In semi-arid, weakly glacierised catchments, water equivalent (w.e.) volumes stored in RGs can exceed glacier ice volumes or may do so in the future <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.16"/>. Third, water is stored in the unfrozen fine-grained sediments of intact and relict RGs and interacts while flowing through or beneath RGs (storage–release, routing, and chemical alteration/mineralisation of water) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.17"/>. The storage capacity of liquid water increases with progressing RG degradation, where the available pore space increases at the expense of the lost ground ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx113" id="paren.18"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e177">Ground-ice volumes in the AL are ostensibly much smaller compared to those of permafrost ice; however, they are the sites of rapid exchange between the atmosphere and hydrosphere. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.19"/> reported that observed seasonal accumulation and melt of 40–60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of ground ice stored a substantial amount (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the snowpack in the Northern Tien Shan. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.20"/> found interannual ice storage changes on the Dos Lenguas rock glacier (Dry Andes of Argentina) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (25 %–80 % of the annual precipitation) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (17 %–55 %) for 2016–2017 and 2017–2018, respectively. On the Murtèl RG, where our present study is performed, seasonal ice storage changes in the AL were found to be 15–30 cm w.e. (10 %–32 % of the annual precipitation) based on point-scale belowground stake measurements and AL energy budgets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.21"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e257">Distributed, non-invasive, and portable near-surface geophysical methods are well suited for mountain permafrost monitoring. Recent decades have seen the emergence of the subdomain of hydrogeophysics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.22"/>, wherein geophysical techniques are developed and applied to address hydrological and hydrogeological questions, and cryogeophysics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.23"/>, to address cryosphere-related questions. As there is strong coupling of many hydrogeological and cryosphere processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105" id="paren.24"/>, hydrogeophysical and cryogeophysical methods and applications have considerable overlap. Methods, such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), ground-penetrating radar (GPR), and active seismics, have found useful applications in alpine contexts. These include rockslide characterisation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.25"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, aquifer delimitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.26"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, glacier tomography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.27"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, and permafrost measurement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Geophysical methods can be considered either stationary or transient in their applications. Stationary measurements are suited to subsurface “mapping” and the differentiation of units or layers, while transient methods enable the measurement of spatio-temporal variations in water or ice content. The application of transient methods can reveal new, often quantitative, information on subsurface water and ice dynamics.</p>
      <p id="d2e291">Gravimetry is a geophysical and geodetic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.29"/> set of techniques involving the measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (acceleration due to gravity) across the Earth's surface. The GRACE and GRACE-FO missions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.30"/> measure transient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on a global scale; however, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial “footprint” of space-borne gravimetry is of little use for field-scale investigations. Stationary (steady-state) gravimetry at the land surface has a long history of providing information on geological interfaces. In permafrost studies, however, its use has been quite limited compared to other geophysical methods. Stationary gravimetry has been used to locate massive subsurface ice and ice-rich soils <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.31"/> and to determine RG internal structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.32"/>. At the Murtèl RG, a 1991 gravimetric survey was used to map the bedrock interface and spatial extent of layers observed in core samples <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="paren.33"/>. Time-lapse gravimetry (TLG), sometimes referred to as “differential gravimetry” or “transient (micro)gravimetry”, involves measuring temporal changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at one or more locations. In alpine environments, use of the method is growing. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.34"/> observed spatially variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across a talus–moraine complex in the Lake O'Hara (Canada) headwater catchment during the snow-free period. Also over the snow-free period, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.35"/> recorded large decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Vallon de Réchy (Switzerland) relative to a point located outside the catchment. Both of these studies used the Scintrex CG-5, which has since been superseded by the Scintrex CG-6, a significantly more stable and accurate relative gravimeter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.36"/>. At the Zugspitze (Germany), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="text.37"/> used a continuous time series from a superconducting absolute gravimeter to investigate snowpack dynamics, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.38"/> performed a similar investigation on the Vernagtferner glacier (Austria). TLG has not yet been explicitly used to measure permafrost or periglacial processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e378">Here, we present the first TLG study of an active RG. At the well-documented Murtèl RG <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx112 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.39"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, we combine repeat measurements of gravity with repeat aerial imagery in order to determine the change in gravity attributable to ice melt in the AL (AL thaw) over the thaw season. Additionally, we calculate and compare the 2024 Bouguer anomaly (BA) data with those obtained in 1991 by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="text.40"/>. We interpret these results in combination with point measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.41"/> to reveal spatial patterns in AL dynamics and multi-decadal permafrost loss. Finally, we discuss the potential of TLG for monitoring ice/water storage changes in the mountain cryosphere and give research perspectives on exploring permafrost–groundwater connectivity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>The Murtèl rock glacier</title>
      <p id="d2e401">Murtèl RG (WGS 84: 46°25<sup>′</sup>47<sup>′′</sup> N, 9°49<sup>′</sup>15<sup>′′</sup> E; CH1903+/LV95: 2'783'080, 1'144'820; 2620–2700 m a.s.l. (metre above sea level); Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a) is located in a north-facing cirque in the Upper Engadine, a moderately continental, rain-shadowed high valley in the southeastern Swiss Alps (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a). Mean annual air temperature (MAAT) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and mean annual precipitation (MAP) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">900</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="paren.42"/>. The RG covers an elevation range from 2620 (base of front) to 2720 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (transition to talus) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b–d). The talus slopes (2720–2800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)  connect the active RGs to the headwalls that rise up to 3165 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> The small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) non-glacierised Murtèl catchment consists of an unvegetated rock glacier, talus slope debris, and bedrock. Murtèl is located at the permafrost margin, and only its forefield (2600–2620 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is permafrost free <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx97" id="paren.43"/>. The rock glacier sits in a bowl-shaped, glacially overdeepened bedrock depression that has been mapped with a multi-geophysical approach combined with borehole logs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="paren.44"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e590">Locations of the gravity survey points and webcam photos from the survey dates. <bold>(a)</bold> Locations of the Maloja and Silvaplana points. Inset: location of the study site within Switzerland. <bold>(b)</bold> Locations of the local points on and in the vicinity of Murtèl RG. <bold>(c)</bold> Webcam image (courtesy of the Swiss Permafrost Monitoring Network PERMOS, University of Fribourg) of the RG during the first survey. <bold>(d)</bold> Webcam image of the RG during the second survey. Both webcam images have approximate locations of points <monospace>MURTEL02</monospace> to -07 overlaid (<monospace>MURTEL01</monospace> and <monospace>-08</monospace> not visible). Background maps from Swisstopo.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3397/2025/tc-19-3397-2025-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e621">The lobate Murtèl rock glacier is ca. 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long, 180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wide, and covered by a coarse, blocky AL (debris mantle). Geophysical investigations revealed that the AL thickness varies according to the surface micro-topography, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the furrows to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> beneath the ridges <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx112" id="paren.45"/>. Thus, the permafrost table shares the surface furrow-and-ridge micro-topography, albeit with attenuated relief. Fine material increases towards the AL base but is overall sparse. The permeable coarse, blocky AL appears to have a high permeability and a very low water retention capacity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.46"/>. The Murtèl permafrost body between the seasonally thawed coarse, blocky AL and bedrock (at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) consists of three distinct layers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.47"/>: (1) massive ice, sparsely sand- and silt-bearing (3–28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, supersaturated with over 90 % ice content); (2) a layer of ice-saturated frozen sand (28–32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), accommodating ca. 60 % of the total/surface displacement (shear horizon); and (3) ice-saturated debris (32–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 40 % ice). Three boreholes, all located within 30 m distance, intercepted this three-part stratigraphy but also revealed small-scale material differences laterally (e.g., variable ice/sand content, lenses) and thermal anomalies suggesting non-diffusive heat transfer and intra-permafrost water flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.48"/>. The extent and ice content of the ice-rich permafrost body is well known <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx110 bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx112" id="paren.49"/>. Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and seismic refraction tomography data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.50"/> indicate that the ice-rich permafrost core has an extent of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, amounting to a water volume equivalent (WVEQ) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods: gravimetry</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Basic principles of time-lapse gravimetry</title>
      <p id="d2e784">Time-lapse gravimetry (TLG) is the measurement of acceleration due to gravity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, at two or more points in time, usually at fixed locations, in order to determine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. More precisely, TLG measures changes in the vertical component of gravity, which is affected by changes in the distribution of mass:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M35" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∭</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the universal gravitational constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.674</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical unit vector; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the change in density at location <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the measurement point. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements are generally reported in units of mGal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or µGal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">g</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Individual surveys using a portable relative gravimeter generally include multiple points and, through repeat measurements at one or more reference stations, form one or more closed loops. After corrections to the raw data (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>), the residual effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> due to mass distribution changes is revealed. Local mass loss due to ice melt or decreased groundwater storage in the vicinity below a measurement location will result in a decrease in gravity between two repeat surveys. As different mass change processes can result in the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at a given location, interpretation must be informed by other information (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS3"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Time-lapse gravimetry surveys</title>
      <p id="d2e1058">We carried out two microgravimetry surveys on 8 July and 11 September 2024 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using a Scintrex CG-6 Autograv <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.51"/>. A 60 s integration time was used, and, to ensure stability, the device was set to measure until three consecutive measurements within a tolerance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were recorded. The average of this stable 180 s duration measurement period was used in the below-discussed analysis. To enable time-lapse measurements and to correct for instrument drift, both surveys started and terminated at absolute gravimetric reference point no. 1018 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.52"/>, a first-order point (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">980</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">224</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">831</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) located on a bedrock outcrop at the Maloja Pass. In addition to the <monospace>MALOJA</monospace> reference point, nine points were surveyed during both surveys: Silvaplana church, two locations (<monospace>MURTEL01</monospace> and <monospace>-08</monospace>) adjacent to the RG, and six locations on the RG (<monospace>MURTEL02</monospace> to <monospace>-07</monospace>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>). The number of points and their locations were chosen so as to maximise coverage across the RG and to limit the survey duration, ensuring a better drift correction. The total duration of each survey was under 5 h 20 min. Future surveys at Murtèl – or, indeed, at other RGs – could include more measurement locations, requiring multiple survey loops and a longer survey duration. We marked survey points with paint and used a Leica GNSS DGPS<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d2e1148">global navigation satellite system differential global positioning system</p></fn> to survey all points to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 cm absolute accuracy. All survey points were located directly on bedrock or boulders. One challenge with gravimetric surveys on RGs is finding surfaces that are sufficiently horizontal so that the gravimeter can be levelled. Additionally, the height of the gravimeter above the ground surface was measured with a measuring tape to millimetre precision at each location.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Gravity corrections</title>
      <p id="d2e1167">Several standard corrections were applied to the gravimetric data: tilt, internal temperature, height difference, Earth tides, and drift. The first two, tilt and temperature, are automatically applied by the gravimeter to each individual measurement. Tilt was maintained in the calibrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>arcsecond</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range during all measurements; thus, the internal corrections were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The gravimeter was in a stable internal temperature state during the surveys, having being supplied with continuous power for several days prior to the surveys, thus ensuring internal temperature corrections were within the calibrated range. Corrections for height, Earth tides, and drift were all applied manually. During repeat measurements at a given location, the exact height of the device can vary slightly due, in part, to offsets caused by levelling. Gravity decreases with elevation (free-air gravity gradient):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M52" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass of the Earth and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the distance to its centre of mass. While the true value of the local vertical gravity gradient (VGG) varies over Earth's surface, especially in complex terrain, 3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is adequate for this correction of a few <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1309">Earth tides, whose magnitude can reach <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are periodic variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> primarily due to the relative positions of the Sun and Moon with respect to the Earth. Through tidal harmonic databases, Earth tides can be calculated to a level of precision and accuracy that far exceeds gravimetric measurement accuracy. Modern gravimeters implement these corrections internally; however, to ensure the highest possible accuracy, we chose to manually apply these corrections using the current state-of-the art <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.53"/> database, which contains over 28 000 wave groups. Through a Python script, we used the <monospace>pygtide</monospace> package <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.54"/> to calculate the Earth tides for each individual measurement to sub-nGal precision. These corrections, which ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81.7</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the July survey and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the September survey, were applied to the measured data. The resulting datasets were used for the calculation of, and correction for, instrumental drift, which occurs in all relative gravimeters. The Scintrex CG-6 has a low instrumental drift of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> residual drift <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.55"/>, with independent observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.56"/>. By comparing the repeat measurements at <monospace>MALOJA</monospace> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a), we calculated and corrected for total drift. Any residual effects of transient atmospheric pressure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.57"/> are also indirectly corrected for during the drift calculation. Finally, the corrected data were referenced to the <monospace>MALOJA</monospace> reference point to enable calculation of the temporal difference, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in the two surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Bouguer anomaly (BA) calculations for comparison with 1991 gravimetric data</title>
      <p id="d2e1509">The gravimetric investigations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="text.58"/>, carried out in Summer 1991, provided information on the internal structure of the Murtèl RG. Raw data, such as the gravity station coordinates and non-terrain corrected gravity values, from the 1991 survey are unfortunately no longer available. Thus, while terrain corrections are not necessary for time-lapse gravimetry studies, since the data in the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="text.59"/> study are Bouguer anomalies (i.e., terrain corrected), we also perform these corrections to our gravimetric data to enable comparison. Furthermore, while our gravimetric stations <monospace>MURTEL05, -06, -03, -07</monospace>, and <monospace>-08</monospace> correspond to “Profile 3” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx109" id="paren.60"/>, we did not return to the exact locations of the 1991 stations.</p>
      <p id="d2e1527">Calculation of Bouguer anomalies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) involves four corrections:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M68" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BA</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>measured</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>FA</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>terrain</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is “normal” gravity as calculated from the ellipsoid, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>FA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>terrain</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the free air, Bouguer plate, or terrain corrections, respectively. While methods for all of these corrections (also sometimes referred to as “reductions”) are extensively documented <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.61"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, there are several variations in the possible formulas and methods for each of these corrections. The methods reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="text.62"/>, and also detailed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="text.63"/>, included an erroneous form of the 1967 international gravity formula in a second-order expansion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.64"/>, a linear <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3086</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mGal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> free-air correction, and a linear Bouguer plate correction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mGal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2670</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Their reported terrain corrections included two inner <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.65"/> prism zones and two outer line-of-mass zones to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">167</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our application of these methods did not result in BAs in their reported range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">157.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">155.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mGal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Such issues related to reproducing historic BAs published in the Swiss Gravimetric Atlas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="paren.66"/> have been encountered and documented by others <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.67"/>. Swisstopo, the Swiss Federal Office of Topography, has also confirmed these issues related to incomplete documentation of the processing of historic datasets. We thus apply modern standard corrections in order to enable comparisons of BAs relative to others in the same survey. Specifically, we use the full GRS80 Somigliana formula <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.68"/> for normal gravity, the Wenzel free-air correction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="paren.69"/> with ETRS89 latitudes, and the Talwani Bouguer plate formula <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="paren.70"/> with a density of 2670 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Terrain corrections were performed using the Swisstopo <monospace>GRAVNIV</monospace> software with the publicly available 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Swiss digital terrain model <monospace>swissALTI3D</monospace>, as discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.71"/> and further detailed in Appendix 3A of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.72"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Digitisation of the 1991 survey data</title>
      <p id="d2e1859">As discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>, the only sources of the 1991 survey data currently available are the graphical data in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="text.73"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="text.74"/> (both of which contain the same information). We used a digitisation tool to extract, directly from the figures, the positions of the 1991 gravimetry survey points and the values of the calculated BAs and relative position along “Profile 3” data. Accuracy in the BA data digitisation procedure can be considered <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along the profile. Planar positions can be considered accurate to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, although we note some discrepancy between planar positions on the original map <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="paren.75"/> and the distances along the original “Profile 3”. In the absence of other information, we present the 1991 survey data as originally published.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Methods: snow spatial distribution and corrections using aerial imagery</title>
      <p id="d2e1931">In order to distinguish between surface and subsurface cryosphere processes in our gravimetric analyses, we need to account for the effect of snow present during the first survey. To accomplish this, we used photogrammetry with UAV imagery.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Aerial imagery data acquisition</title>
      <p id="d2e1941">On both survey dates, we obtained aerial images using a compact DJI Mini Pro 4 with a 48 megapixel camera. The drone was piloted over the lower part of the RG to ensure coverage across the target zone. Due to the presence of overhead aerial cables and an operating gondola lift, extended zones were not surveyed. In total, 375 images were acquired during the July 2024 survey and 268 images during the September 2024 survey. As non-RTK<fn id="Ch1.Footn2"><p id="d2e1944">real-time kinematic</p></fn> UAVs have poor positional accuracy, we also established and measured ground control points (GCPs) in order to improve outputs from the photogrammetry processes. We used a Leica GNSS RTK surveying system to measure the 3-D positions of eight GCPs, colocated at the gravimetric survey points <monospace>MURTEL01</monospace> to <monospace>-08</monospace> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>), to 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precision and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accuracy.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Photogrammetry</title>
      <p id="d2e1987">Digital surface models (DSMs) and orthomosaics were created for both survey dates. We used the photogrammetry software Pix4Dmapper (v4.9.0, 2023, Pix4D S.A., Switzerland). The average ground-sampling distance was 2.04 cm for the July survey and 3.45 cm for the September survey. A high number of median key points per image (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both surveys) were determined, each with a minimum of four matches across multiple images. We manually georeferenced six GCPs (<monospace>MURTEL02</monospace> to <monospace>-07</monospace>) that could be located in multiple images with high precision and accuracy. The georeferenced point clouds were used to produce DSMs and orthomosaics with 5 cm resolution. We used noise filtering and inverse distance weighting, but no surface smoothing, for the DSM processing. Comparison of the final results revealed only very small offsets at the sub-pixel scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Snow density measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e2017">In order to calculate the effect of snow on measured gravity, snow density needed to be measured. We measured the density using a portable digital balance (precision 0.1 g) and a coring tube (inner diameter 5 cm). The volume and mass of 18 samples from different locations at various depths up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured. The measured sample sizes ranged from 137–736 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and from 76–410 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Measured densities ranged from 504–587 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a typical range for névé <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.76"/>. The average snow density was determined to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Calculation of the snow gravity effect</title>
      <p id="d2e2108">The gravitational effect of the snow, present in the July survey and absent in the September one, at each of the survey points was calculated through a multistep process: (1) creation of a snow raster mask based on the July orthomosaic, (2) calculation of the height difference between the DSMs, (3) fusion of these data to create a 3-D differential snow volume model, and (4) forward calculation of the vertical gravity effect at the gravity survey points. Python, implementing standard packages (<italic>numpy</italic>, <italic>matplotlib</italic>, etc.) and <italic>rasterio</italic>, was used for these processes. Throughout, manually clipped DSMs and orthomosaics were used, limiting the analysis to snow-covered regions with high-quality DSM data for both surveys.</p>
      <p id="d2e2120">We first created a spatial mask for the snow-covered pixels using the July 2024 orthomosaic (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>). This georeferenced image was converted to a luminance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) greyscale format as per the Rec. 709 formula:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M93" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2125</mml:mn><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7154</mml:mn><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0721</mml:mn><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the red, green, and blue pixel intensities, respectively. The luminance image was blurred using a uniform, centred filter of dimensions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This was necessary in order to avoid isolated high-luminosity pixels being identified as snow. A simple 55 % threshold was applied to the processed image, with the exception of the low-albedo snow in the southeast corner of the surveyed zone, where a 38 % threshold was used. This process resulted in satisfactory identification of snow-covered regions, while avoiding misidentification of non-snow-covered regions such as high-luminosity boulders. The height difference between the July and September DSMs was evaluated by a simple difference between the two. The above-discussed snow mask, as well as a 5 cm thickness lower bound, was applied to this raster data. The final result was a 2-D map of snow thickness (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>), which, when combined with either the July or September DSM, provides 3-D information on the change in snow volume distribution.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2226">Snow depth and the digital surface models (DSM) calculated via photogrammetry and manual fixed point referencing. <bold>(a)</bold> The depth of the snow present during the July 2024 survey and absent in the September 2024 survey. Inset <bold>(b)</bold> is a histogram of the area covered by the snow with depths in 10 cm intervals. <bold>(c)</bold> The DSM for the 8 July 2024 survey. <bold>(d)</bold> The DSM for the 11 September 2024 survey. Only areas with sufficient coverage by both surveys are shown. The black dots indicate the locations of our gravimetric survey points (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3397/2025/tc-19-3397-2025-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2250">To calculate the decrease in gravity due to the melting snow, we performed forward gravity modelling using a modified version of Gravi4GW <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.77"/> that implements the Nagy prism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.78"/> rather than equivalent point masses. A correction for the height of the proof mass <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.79"><named-content content-type="pre">6.58 cm above the bottom of the gravimeter,</named-content></xref> relative to our surveyed coordinates (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b) was also applied, although the effect was minor for all points (0.0–0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e2276">Additionally, when comparing the digital surface models from the two surveys, we discovered a new large boulder, ostensibly originating from the unstable zone located adjacent and above (southwest) the RG. We estimated the boulder's mass to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The nearest gravimetry point, <monospace>MURTEL04</monospace>, was located <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> away and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than the boulder's centre of mass. The straight-line gravitational pull of this boulder on <monospace>MURTEL04</monospace> was thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the vertical component (i.e., that which we measure in time-lapse gravimetry) was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, we conclude that this new rock mass can be ignored in our analyses.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Seasonal gravity variations</title>
      <p id="d2e2384">In order to correct for the gravity effect of the snow present in the July 2024 survey, the net gravitational effect on the survey points <monospace>MURTEL01</monospace> to <monospace>-08</monospace> was calculated (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>). This vertical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effect of the snow ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<monospace>MURTEL04</monospace>) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<monospace>MURTEL06</monospace>) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>). Only the vertical component of snow-induced gravity change has an effect on measured gravity (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/> and Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/>). While a significant amount of snow was present (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>), the majority of its gravitational effect is non-vertical. For reference, 1 m<sup>3</sup> of snow (with a density of 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at a horizontal distance of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, centred 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below a given point, would have a vertical gravity effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We also note that while snow-covered regions extending hundreds of metres from the RG could not be surveyed, these zones are generally at higher elevations than the survey points. The gravitational effect of the snow in those lateral zones would thus be small and positive <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.80"/>. The limited spatial coverage of the DSMs would thus have the effect of underestimating net mass loss in the AL and subsurface water. Finally, the statistical uncertainty in the measured snow density was 4.9 %, which translates to an uncertainty ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<monospace>MURTEL04</monospace>) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<monospace>MURTEL06</monospace>).</p>

<table-wrap id="T1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2554"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results after processing (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>snow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after accounting for the effect of surface snow mass <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>snow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Point name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Processed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Snow effect</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, after</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (µGal)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>snow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">snow effect</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(µGal)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">correction</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(µGal)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><monospace>MURTEL01</monospace></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><monospace>MURTEL02</monospace></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><monospace>MURTEL03</monospace></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><monospace>MURTEL04</monospace></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><monospace>MURTEL05</monospace></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><monospace>MURTEL06</monospace></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><monospace>MURTEL07</monospace></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><monospace>MURTEL08</monospace></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e2600">* Incomplete DSM coverage of surrounding terrain.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e3029">Accounting for the snow, net gravity changes were negative at all eight survey points (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>), indicating a local decrease in subsurface mass. With the exception of <monospace>MURTEL04</monospace>, located near the western flank of the RG, all net gravity changes were in the approximate range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Along the central profile, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases in magnitude from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near the lower rooting zone (<monospace>MURTEL05</monospace>) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near the front. <monospace>MURTEL08</monospace>, located on bedrock <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the RG front, experienced a decrease in gravity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Results from the two lateral survey locations, <monospace>MURTEL02</monospace> near the east flank (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <monospace>MURTEL04</monospace> to the west (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), differ significantly, although limited DSM coverage may have a minor influence on the snow-corrected value at <monospace>MURTEL04</monospace>. Overall, while there is a spatial trend along the central line, the results point to significant heterogeneity in the subsurface processes. For first-order interpretation, the Bouguer plate approximation (BPA), an infinite flat plane where a decrease of 2.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in water level equivalent equates to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change, provides a rough starting point, implying decreases in subsurface water storage from 12–70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of water equivalent (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS1"/> for an in-depth discussion and quantitative interpretation).</p>
      <p id="d2e3220">For uncertainty estimation, we follow the same logic as previous TLG investigations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.81"/>, noting that these two studies used Scintrex CG-5 devices, which have significantly worse temperature and tilt stability and greater drift rates compared to the CG-6 device used in our study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.82"/>. In terms of uncertainty, we assume three significant and uncorrelated sources of uncertainty, in addition to the before-discussed uncertainty in the snow and rockfall correction (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>): precision, drift, and elevation. Precision groups together uncertainty related to vibrations, tilt corrections, and internal temperature corrections (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>). As determined from standard deviation of the three repeats whose average was used to determine the final values, we observe values ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the July survey and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the September survey. Adding these uncertainties together in quadrature for each survey point, we obtain precision uncertainties in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We assume an uncertainty associated with the impact of non-linear drift of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on survey duration and device specifications. Finally, uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated with uncertainty in the height of the device is assumed to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as we manually measured the height of the device to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precision (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) in addition to surveying. Calculations of these uncertainties, combined with the snow and rockfall correction uncertainty for individual points, range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus we arrive at a total estimated uncertainty in the snow cover-corrected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3469"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty budget.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Source</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Value (µGal)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Instrument precision</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Instrument drift</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Elevation differences</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Snow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rockfall</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e3481">* The total uncertainty is calculated from the square root of the sum of the squares of the individual uncertainty components.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Comparison of the 1991 and 2024 gravity surveys</title>
      <p id="d2e3641">As discussed (Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/>), even though most TLG applications do not require normal gravity, free air, Bouguer plate, and terrain corrections, we needed to calculate and apply these to calculate the Bouguer anomaly for comparison with the digitised 1991 survey data. Furthermore, due to incomplete documentation of the processing steps in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="text.83"/> and lack of the original DSM files, absolute differences between the published 1991 values of our BA values differ by an offset which cannot be known exactly (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>). While uncertainty of the 1991 survey data is not extensively discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="text.84"/> or <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="text.85"/>, the techniques and technology of the time clearly limited the achievable accuracy of the data. The LaCoste and Romberg model G gravimeter used in 1991 had a repeatability of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and accuracy of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The higher density of points in that study (1 every <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the central line profile) allowed for the calculation of a smoothed trend line which we use for comparisons to the 2024 data on a relative basis (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>).</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3704"><bold>(a)</bold> Bouguer anomalies (BAs) and <bold>(b)</bold> approximate relative positions. The smoothed trend line (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/>) from the 1991 survey <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx109" id="paren.86"/> and those calculated from our 2024 surveys (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>) are shown. Distance refers to that of “Profile 3” in the 1991 survey, starting from its uppermost point. Approximate distances of the 2024 survey points in proximity to the 1991 profile are shown. An additional point near “Profile 1” in the 1991 survey is not shown: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">152.447</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">152.476</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mGal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in July/September 2024 vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">156.15</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mGal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1991 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="paren.87"/>. Note that, due to lack of documentation and differences in methodologies (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>), the values cannot be compared directly, although spatial trends and the relative values within each survey can.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3397/2025/tc-19-3397-2025-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3771">By displaying the calculated BAs with a fixed offset of 3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mGal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>), we can approximately match our off-RG forefront survey point, <monospace>MURTEL08</monospace> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>), to the 1991 smoothed line in order to facilitate visual comparisons of the relative values. Our Bouguer anomalies display a larger difference between the forefront region (<monospace>MURTEL08</monospace>) and front and central RG zones (<monospace>MURTEL07</monospace>, <monospace>-03</monospace>, and <monospace>-06</monospace>) than in the 1991 survey. In contrast, the difference between the forefront and lower rooting zone at the transition to the talus slope (<monospace>MURTEL05</monospace>) is similar to that observed in the 1991 survey. Comparing with the smoothed historic data, the relative difference between the forefront and the front/central zones appears to be approximately 110–190 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater in 2024 than in 1991. Similarly, comparing <monospace>MURTEL08</monospace> to <monospace>MURTEL04</monospace> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>), the difference between the BAs at these points increases by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the 1991 and 2024 surveys. Our other survey points, <monospace>MURTEL01</monospace> and <monospace>-02</monospace>, do not overlap with any of the 1991 survey points. Their BA values are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">152.241</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (July) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">152.253</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mGal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (September) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">152.550</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (July) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">152.564</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mGal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (September), respectively. Comparisons of data from our surveys and the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="text.88"/> survey must be interpreted with caution due to the unquantified uncertainties in the 1991 survey data and the differences in the locations of our survey points. As such, we stress that the 1991–2024 comparison provides qualitative, relative insights rather than precise, quantitative measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <label>6.1</label><title>Seasonal processes and gravity</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>6.1.1</label><title>Seasonal storage changes in the active layer</title>
      <p id="d2e3937">The corrected July–September <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>) result from the integrated effect of mass distribution changes surrounding the survey point, weighted by distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). Corrections for change of mass on the surface, in the form of snow (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>), allow for local subsurface processes to be isolated. The net negative gravity changes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate a decrease in total water storage (ground ice and liquid water) – that is, net export of ice/water out of the rock glacier and underlying aquifers. While uncertainties exist (see discussion below), we attribute the dominant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal over the thaw season to ice storage changes in the AL. However, we caution that, on their own, the observed seasonal decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can not be attributed exclusively to active layer thaw or to groundwater storage decreases. Our reasoning is based on previous observations, specifically belowground stake measurements of the moving ground-ice table and ground-ice melt inferred from calculated AL energy budgets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.89"/>. In order to estimate the water equivalent (w.e.) of this change in ice mass, we employ the Python tool GRAVI4GW <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.90"/>, which takes into account the non-horizontal and non-planar topology of a changing unconfined groundwater table or, in our case, that of the ground-ice table (AL base). The sensitivity of gravity changes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to total water storage changes,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M203" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            varies with the effective depth of the groundwater/ice table <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and is influenced by the surrounding topography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.91"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies with terrain slope and curvature just as the local vertical gravity gradient (VGG) does <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117" id="paren.92"/> and is highest on convex topographic features (mounds, ridges). A related concept is topographic admittance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx106" id="paren.93"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, which is most relevant for thin surface water accumulation (e.g., in the form of snow). The influence of small-scale topographic features decreases, while the effective radius of influence or “footprint” increases, with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.94"/>. Based on field observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.95"/>, PERMOS borehole temperature series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.96"/>, and geophysical investigations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx112 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.97"/>, the AL depth can be assumed to be in the range of 2–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using this range of values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty) translate to an estimated water equivalent of AL ice melt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>we</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between surveys in the range of 15–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all on-RG locations except <monospace>MURTEL04</monospace> (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4217">The 2024 seasonal gravity and total water storage changes at survey points <monospace>MURTEL02</monospace> to <monospace>-08</monospace>. Total water storage (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) calculated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (uncertainty ranges shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3397/2025/tc-19-3397-2025-f04.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4272">Calculated seasonal (8 July–11 September 2024) belowground total water storage change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>we</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a range of hypothetical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) and measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (thick lines) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dotted lines) for the on-RG survey points <monospace>MURTEL02</monospace> to <monospace>-07</monospace> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> for locations of survey points). The off-RG survey points, <monospace>MURTEL01</monospace> and <monospace>-08</monospace>, are included for completeness.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3397/2025/tc-19-3397-2025-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e4348">TLG measurements are fundamentally ambiguous because the gravitational effect depends on the magnitude, distance, and relative position of the mass change relative to the survey point (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). Two features of TLG are noteworthy (and discussed further in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS3"/>): gravity does not discriminate between water in its solid or liquid state, and it is in places weakly sensitive to the depth where the water storage changes occur <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.98"/>. As a consequence, different groundwater and ice storage changes – whether localised and shallow or extended and deep (or any combinations thereof) – can produce the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal that reflects the total water storage change below ground (i.e., excluding snow). This is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>, where total water storage change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>we</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is plotted as a function of depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the (hypothetical) water/ice table. While other subsurface processes (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS2"/>) may play some role, the inferred <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>we</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 15–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compares well with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.99"/> (15–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting that the snow-corrected on-RG <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are dominantly a signal of ice storage changes in the AL. This interpretation is most convincing at the mid-frontal survey points <monospace>MURTEL06</monospace>, <monospace>MURTEL03</monospace>, and <monospace>MURTEL07</monospace> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>), which are in the vicinity of direct AL thickness measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.100"/>. Due to its sparse fine-material content, the Murtèl AL has a small retention capacity for liquid water, and supra-permafrost groundwater export is negligible on a seasonal scale. This interpretation is supported by the flashy outflow during the thaw season. After precipitation events in late summer, the supra-permafrost aquifer drains rapidly within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the rock glacier springs dry out <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.101"/>. Furthermore, electrical resistivities of the Murtèl active layer are high, and injecting current has been notoriously difficult to measure, also suggesting a low water content <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.102"/>. Murtèl is a coarse, blocky rock glacier, and the effect of changing supra-permafrost groundwater levels is potentially important on rock glaciers, having more fine material in the AL. Under the assumption that the dominant mass redistribution effect stems from AL ice melt, the uncertainty in AL storage change water equivalent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>we</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is in the range of 10–14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for survey points on the RG. This uncertainty stems from both the uncertainty of the final snow-corrected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and the uncertainty in the local AL depth below the surface. The sensitivity–depth relation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) differs between survey points and varies with terrain slope and curvature. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>we</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty stemming from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (as opposed to from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements) is influenced by topography and can be calculated beforehand to optimise the survey point locations. Survey points on moderately convex features (ridges and plateaus) generally give higher sensitivity to storage changes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that varies little with effective depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is illustrated by the mid-frontal survey points <monospace>MURTEL06</monospace>, <monospace>MURTEL03</monospace>, and <monospace>MURTEL07</monospace>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and consequently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>we</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) varies little with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. There, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>we</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty stems mainly from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>) rather than that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. With a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) weakly sensitive to depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, total storage change estimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>we</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are only weakly impacted by the uncertainty in AL depth or the possible occurrence of deeper thaw processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>6.1.2</label><title>Other seasonal-scale processes</title>
      <p id="d2e4727">In principle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is sensitive to more than just ice loss by AL thaw. Other changes in total water storage, in both solid and liquid states, and mass movements can also affect gravity at the RG surface (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). These include effects from snow, intra-permafrost melt and subsidence, groundwater export, and rock movements. Snowpack can significantly contribute to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal and must be accounted for by calculating and subtracting its differential gravitational effect (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>). Based on the drone-derived differential DSMs and the snow density measurements, the snow cover effect could be precisely calculated (within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>) and amounted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>), except at survey point <monospace>MURTEL04</monospace>. There, near the western rock glacier margin, the snow's vertical gravity effect was counterintuitively weak despite large snow depths locally exceeding 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the nearby depressions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). The small gravitational effect of the snow occurred here, because mass losses above and below the survey point have opposing effects on the measured vertical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and have, effectively, partially cancelled each other out (melt at higher elevation increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while melt at lower elevation decreases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, limited extended DSM coverage towards the adjacent Marmugnun rock glacier precludes a conclusive uncertainty analysis for the correction at this point.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e4842">Conceptual longitudinal cross-section model (not to scale) displaying water/ice storage changes that occur in rock glaciers. While the structure and bowl-shaped base of Murtèl are integrated here, the displayed processes may occur in all rock glaciers. On the seasonal scale of our July–September 2024 TLG measurements, superficial melt of snow (which we account for in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>) and near-surface AL thaw (discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS1"/>) are the dominant processes. On multi-year timescales, all of the processes (labelled in red), as well as rock mass movements (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS2"/>), may play a role. These processes may alter the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as measured at the surface.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3397/2025/tc-19-3397-2025-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e4864">Belowground water/ice storage changes (in excess of the pore space) can result in subsidence or heave. At Murtèl, however, subsidence (loss of excess ice) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, an order of magnitude smaller than the seasonal ice storage change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.103"/>. While the presence of liquid water in the permafrost core of Murtèl (and other rock glaciers) is well documented from borehole drilling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.104"/>, little is known about temporal changes in intra-permafrost water content. Based on the weak heat fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.105"/> and the low hydraulic permeability of the ice-rich permafrost body <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.106"/>, we consider effects of intra-permafrost thaw (that would decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and changes in water content negligible on seasonal timescale compared to the substantial ice turnover in the AL.</p>
      <p id="d2e4911">Assuming low hydraulic conductivity and porosity in the crystalline bedrock (granodiorite), groundwater export from the base of the Murtèl RG, lying in an over-deepened bowl-shaped depression <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx111" id="paren.107"/>, could reasonably be expected to be rather limited on the seasonal timescale. Nonetheless, weathered bedrock at shallow depths may have significantly higher conductivities and porosities than at depth, allowing for seasonal storage changes that may affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to a measurable level. The decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the off-RG points suggest that groundwater storage has decreased. While both <monospace>MURTEL01</monospace> and <monospace>MURTEL08</monospace> are likely to be influenced by RG active layer thaw, <monospace>MURTEL08</monospace> in particular (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>h) suggests that groundwater storage decreases have also occurred. There is, however, no borehole intersecting the bedrock; thus, it is impossible to draw firm conclusions about groundwater storage changes beneath the Murtèl RG, where known seasonal AL ice thaw occurs and has been directly measured. Based on the observation that the RG springs dry out in hot and dry summer periods when melt rates are highest, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.108"/> found that a significant proportion of Murtèl meltwater does not leave the catchment as surface streamflow and thus most likely recharges the sub-permafrost aquifer. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.109"/> reached the same conclusion for a rock glacier in the Dry Andes. The influence of groundwater recharge at the RG base is nonetheless impossible to verify without bedrock-intersecting piezometric levels, hydraulic characterisation of the fractured bedrock, or detailed water balance measurements and calculations. This cryosphere–groundwater connectivity, whose relevance may be significant on longer timescales, is further discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS4"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4951">As for non-water/ice mass redistribution phenomena, accumulation of rock mass above and near the survey points could effectively reduce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Due to the inverse-distance-squared weighting (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), mass movement effects on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be most pronounced at survey points closest to the active root zone (talus slope) and to the nearby Marmugnun RG (<monospace>MURTEL04</monospace>), although this depends on the individual rockfall trajectories. The gravitational pull of a large rockfall boulder deposited between the two time-lapse survey dates has been calculated from the two DSMs (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>), and these processes are deemed insignificant at the seasonal scale, although this depends on the exact locations of survey points and rockfall trajectories. In this study, we do not account for processes occurring in neighbouring regions, although we note that decreasing mass at elevations above our survey points would be positive and thus have the effect of “masking” the change in gravity imparted by AL ice melt and other subsurface ice and water mass losses in the RG.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <label>6.2</label><title>Multi-decadal processes and gravity</title>
      <p id="d2e4987">Comparison of the 1991 survey data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="paren.110"/> and our measurements must be nuanced by the technological and methodological factors discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2"/>. Nevertheless, some interpretations and hypotheses can be set forth. While over a single thaw season, or part thereof, melt of ground ice in the AL is the dominant mass redistribution process, over multi-year timescales – in this case 33 years – there are several processes that may significantly affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5002">The starkest change in the spatial trends of the BA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>) is the relative decrease in gravity in the central and frontal regions (<monospace>MURTEL06</monospace>, <monospace>-03</monospace>, and <monospace>-07</monospace>) as compared to both the forefront measurement point (<monospace>MURTEL08</monospace>) and that in the lower rooting zone (<monospace>MURTEL05</monospace>). Although <monospace>MURTEL08</monospace> is located <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m from the 1991 survey profile, the others are all located <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from it. Thus, even if we ignore the forefront point, a clear difference in trend can be observed where the BA is now lower relative to that of the rooting zone than it was in 1991. Mountain permafrost regions are highly dynamic environments characterised by mass-moving processes (rock/debris) and total water (water, snow, ice) storage changes acting on different magnitudes, rates/timescales, and depths below ground, i.e., on the surface, in the AL (supra-permafrost), in the permafrost body (intra-permafrost), and beneath (sub-permafrost). The Murtèl periglacial cirque is typical in this respect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.111"/>. Here, we discuss processes related to both rock mass movements and water/ice storage changes that could be relevant for decadal changes in gravity in alpine periglacial settings (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e5055">Landform and rock mass movements involve gradual or episodic movement of mass. Active rock glaciers undergo creep at rates of a few <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.112"/>, and destabilised rock glaciers can move at rates in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.113"/>. Even at slowly deforming RGs, such as Murtèl, the effects of creep on mass distribution, and thus potentially <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, will be significant on multi-year timescales. Furthermore, RG creep will eventually render it impossible to return to the same survey points for repeat surveys as the point in space may end up being within the rock mass or high above the land surface. Although Murtèl exhibits comparatively slow creep rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, amounting to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of horizontal displacement over 33 years, the displacement alone is very unlikely to account for the 1991–2024 differences. We note that shifting these 2024 BA points by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> would result in an overlap with the 1991 trend line. Rockfall and other landslide-type events also redistribute mass. The interplay of the effects of rock debris from headwalls above rooting zones and those of RG creep is highly complex and would require careful and extended topographic surveying (i.e., with lidar or photogrammetry) at the time of each gravimetric survey. When conceptualising the gravitational effects of these, and, indeed, all mass redistribution processes, it is important to remember the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> weighting (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) of mass changes. All things being unchanged, if mass is removed from an elevation above the point and added at an elevation below a point, then gravity will increase. However, the effect of falling rock mass is dependent on the relative distance and vertical orientation relative to a measurement location, both before and after the rockslide episode. Finally, tectonic uplift may be important to consider for multi-decadal TLG surveys, although its effect would be uniform across such a small study area at the Murtèl RG. In the Bernina Alps, tectonic uplift rates are about 1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="paren.114"/>; thus, tectonic uplift contributes no more than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the BA between 1991 and 2024.</p>
      <p id="d2e5280">Water storage changes, in both liquid and solid form, impart both seasonal (periodic) and decadal changes to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Surface processes, such as snow accumulation and melt, cause periodic changes and are much more straightforward to measure than subsurface ones, although gravimetry has been demonstrated to be useful in its monitoring on short and long timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx106" id="paren.115"/>. Annual freeze–thaw cycles in the AL are also primarily periodic in their effects (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS1"/>). Decadal progressive deepening (or thinning) of the AL could potentially be measurable with TLG. In periglacial environments in general, permafrost degradation will have measurable effects on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as will groundwater storage changes (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS4"/>). In RGs, specifically, intra-permafrost melt of excess ice results in a net loss of mass and may result in an increase in bulk density. At a given point in space above the RG, these processes would decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, although the effect on BA would be more complex to discern due to the potential for compaction and also due to dynamic effects from compressive thickening or extensive thinning. Overall, our BA results suggest that, compared to 1991, there is now a relatively lower mass density in the central and frontal regions compared to the rooting zone. It is highly likely that both ice/water storage (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>) and rock movement processes have influenced these changes in the BA. Additionally, the periodic drying of frontal springs during melt periods (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS2"/>) supports the hypothesis that deep groundwater export may have also occurred. Future high-precision gravimetric measurements that can be compared in absolute terms to our 2024 surveys will enable the evaluation of long-term water/ice storage change processes within the RG.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e5320">Types of mass distribution changes in mountain permafrost environments that potentially affect the surface value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus are relevant for time-lapse gravimetry. Periodic processes (e.g., AL freeze–thaw) will dominate on short (seasonal) timescales, while other processes may have significant effects over longer timescales.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="1">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="120mm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Landform and mass movements</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left"> Mass movements: rockfall, debris flows, and debris-laden avalanches</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left"> Landform-scale permafrost creep</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left"> Tectonic effects (alpine uplift)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Hydrological storage changes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left"> Accumulation/melting of seasonal snowpack</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left"><italic>Total subsurface water storage change</italic>, composed of the following:</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left"><list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5391">supra-permafrost (in AL) water storage changes,</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5395">supra-permafrost ice storage changes by seasonal ice build-up and melt (periodic) and by permafrost degradation (progressive AL thickening),</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5399">intra-permafrost ice/water storage changes (permafrost degradation, talik formation),</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5403">sub-permafrost groundwater storage changes in deeper aquifers (cirque overdeepening) or fractured bedrock.</p></list-item></list></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3">
  <label>6.3</label><title>Potential of TLG for monitoring of permafrost and periglacial landforms</title>
      <p id="d2e5419">TLG offers clear opportunities for monitoring the various seasonal and long-term water/ice storage processes that occur in permafrost and periglacial environments. While gravimetry has existed for decades, modern portable devices, such as the Scintrex CG-6 used in our study, offer levels of stability and accuracy that provide new opportunities for monitoring subsurface processes whose effects may only be on the few µGal level. Gravity measurements are non-invasive, integrative, and distributed, and they are possible essentially anywhere that is accessible by foot. Application of TLG to determine absolute gravity changes requires a known reference point, which may not always be feasible. Switzerland has a dense network of maintained absolute gravimetric reference points <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.116"/>, and the Murtèl RG has the particularity of being rapidly accessible via cable car for much of the year. This advantageous situation is not always the case for alpine sites. Nevertheless, there are also multi-step strategies that can be employed to establish temporary local references, although they may require large travel distances and long times, depending on the location. These constraints can effectively prevent the carrying out of absolute TLG surveys. In these cases, relative TLG, which involves using a reference point at which the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is not known absolutely and may vary with time, may be an option. Relative TLG, wherein a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> offset between surveys is not known, still provides data on changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at survey points relative to one another and has already provided useful knowledge in the growing field of alpine hydrogeology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.117"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5452">The non-discriminatory sensitivity of gravimetry to mass changes can be an advantage in permafrost or periglacial environments, where water co-exists in solid and liquid state, as it yields measurements of the total water storage change including ice and water. Without the need for petrophysical relations, forward modelling can be relatively straightforward. This makes gravimetry an ideal complement to other geophysical measurements that are selective to specific physical properties (e.g., electromagnetic or elastic properties). Conversely, attributing the total water storage change to individual supra-, intra-, and sub-permafrost ice/water storage changes (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>) is ambiguous and requires independent observations or a priori knowledge of the stratigraphy and hydraulic properties. Gravimetric surveys also require precise positional measurements of survey points to enable accurate temporal comparisons. For example, in the case of subsidence caused by excess ice melt, mass is lost beneath the survey point, which should decrease gravity. Simultaneously, the subsiding point moves closer to Earth's centre of mass, increasing gravity. Only over multi-year timescales can the two competing effects be accounted for, and the loss of the excess ice can only be quantified if elevation and VGG are known to a high precision. As many complex processes occur in periglacial landforms over seasonal, yearly, and longer timescales, TLG surveys at multiple timescales could provide valuable information to help constrain hydrological, structural, and rheological models of these geomorphological structures.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS4">
  <label>6.4</label><title>Permafrost–groundwater connectivity</title>
      <p id="d2e5465">As recently underlined in multiple recent reviews <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx105" id="paren.118"/>, alpine hydrogeological processes and, in particular, cryosphere–groundwater connectivity are insufficiently understood. In many alpine headwater catchments, RGs are a vital component of annual hydrological and hydrochemical dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.119"/>. Permafrost ice, whether in RGs or other landforms such as frozen talus slopes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.120"/>, is, in essence, immobile groundwater whose presence constitutes a water store and also modifies the subsurface hydraulic properties. Ice build-up and melt are, in turn, controlled as much by the ground thermal regime and the heat fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.121"/> as by water availability from precipitation or snowmelt, be it the seasonal turnover in the AL or permafrost thaw in the underlying rock glacier core. Semi-impervious permafrost bodies can act as aquitards <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.122"/>, leading to rapid supra-permafrost runoff of intense precipitation and a “flashy” hydrograph typical of many permafrost-underlain catchments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="paren.123"/>. At Murtèl RG, however, the before-discussed hydrological measurements, stake measurements, and AL energy budgets suggest that up to 20–30 % of the snowpack is retained as AL ice and melts slowly enough to percolate through the semi-impermeable permafrost body. This “leaky” behaviour and the hypothesis that coarse, blocky permafrost landforms contribute to groundwater recharge by seasonally storing and routing winter precipitation to a sub-permafrost aquifer have been investigated at multiple sites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.124"/>. TLG, as discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS3"/>, is sensitive to all mass changes; therefore, the method would need to be combined with other techniques in order to resolve and differentiate storage changes in permafrost and groundwater.</p>
      <p id="d2e5492">Due to its extensive documentation and overdeepened bowl-shaped bedrock base, Murtèl would be an ideal site for further studies investigating permafrost–groundwater connectivity. The concave underlying bedrock profile may facilitate the infiltration of basal flow to the fractured bedrock (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). Characterisation of the fracture network in the granodiorite bedrock would allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the cryosphere–groundwater processes occurring at Murtèl and their implications for the wider catchment. A multi-method approach, combining hydrological and geophysical measurements with numerical hydrological modelling would help us to understand the timings, volumes, and flow paths of water originating from AL ice melt and permafrost degradation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Conclusion and outlook</title>
      <p id="d2e5506">Climate change is inducing profound changes in the mountain cryosphere and is rapidly modifying the hydrology of high-mountain watersheds. Water percolation across permafrost bodies, as well as intermittent storage in the form of ice, controls groundwater recharge in permafrost-underlain watersheds. These cryo-hydrogeological processes contribute to headwater baseflow, which is critical for aquatic habitats and water supply during droughts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.125"/>. Despite the importance of these phenomena, the complex links between the cryosphere and groundwater are poorly understood <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105" id="paren.126"/>.  There is thus a strong need for quantitative and spatially distributed methods for monitoring intra-annual, inter-annual, and long-term changes in subsurface ice content and water storage in these environments. Recent technical advances in hydrogeodesy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.127"/> have opened new avenues for investigating the connectivity of groundwater with the rapidly changing cryosphere. These advances complement established cryo-geophysical techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.128"/>. Our application of time-lapse gravimetry (TLG) to estimate seasonal ice storage changes in the active layer of the Murtèl RG is the first use of this geophysical technique in a periglacial environment and has demonstrated the ability of the technique to spatially resolve AL thaw. Furthermore, despite the limitations of the historical data, our comparison with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="text.129"/> has shown the potential of multi-decade TLG measurements for permafrost degradation studies. With respect to our combined TLG–photogrammetry methodology and its application to an active RG, we observe the following: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5527">TLG is an ideal method for spatially distributed quantification of mass movements and water/ice storage changes on the seasonal scale due to its non-invasiveness, portability, and spatially integrative sensitivity to mass changes.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5531">The potential for long-term permafrost monitoring using TLG is promising, although comparison with historic gravimetry data is challenging unless the methodology is documented in detail and unless <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes exceed the potentially large uncertainties of historic data. The initiation of high-precision gravimetry–photogrammetry (or gravimetry–lidar) surveys at new sites would provide an invaluable baseline for the monitoring of permafrost degradation and its associated hydrological changes.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5545">In an environment as dynamic as the mountain cryosphere, digital surface models (DSMs) from rapid photogrammetric surveys are valuable – in many cases necessary – for corrections of changing surface snow, névé, or ice coverage and rockfall deposits between surveys. They could also serve to correct for landform movements in long-term TLG studies or those rapidly deforming ice-rich permafrost landforms.</p></list-item></list> Through continued interdisciplinary collaboration across the geophysics, geodesy, geomorphology, cryosphere, and hydrogeology research communities, we anticipate that methodological innovations and diverse perspectives will result in a deeper, more quantitative understanding of total water storage change processes in alpine environments. In mountain permafrost and periglacial environments, TLG holds significant potential for impact on its own and would provide unique, complementary data in joint deployments alongside other transient geophysical, geochemical, and hydrological monitoring techniques.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5553">The code from this work is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16880964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.16880964</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.130"/>. Additionally, Gravi4GW is available at <uri>https://github.com/lhalloran/Gravi4GW</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.131"/>, and PyGtide is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6673581" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6673581</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.132"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5578">Data are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16880964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.16880964</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.133"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5590">Both authors participated in all aspects of the study and wrote the manuscript collaboratively. LJSH obtained the funding and led the study. AI text-generation tools were <italic>not</italic> used for any part of this manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5599">The contact author has declared that neither of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5605">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5612">This article is part of the special issue “Emerging geophysical methods for permafrost investigations: recent advances in permafrost detecting, characterizing, and monitoring”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5619">We thank Dani Vonder Mühll (PHRT/ETHZ) for his encouragement and valiant attempts to retrieve the raw data from the 1991 surveys; Urs Marti (Bundesamt für Landestopografie – Swisstopo) for his generous assistance with the Bouguer anomaly calculations; Nazanin Mohammadi (University of Neuchâtel) for the <italic>Gravi4GW_hybrid</italic> and Earth tide correction script <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.134"><named-content content-type="pre">which utilises <italic>pyGtide</italic> by</named-content></xref>; University of Fribourg, WSL SLF, and PERMOS for the webcam images; Corvatsch Bergbahnen for cable car transport; Martin Andersen (UNSW) and Natalie Andersen for field assistance in the 09.2024 survey; Alastair McClymont (BGC Engineering), Jacopo Boaga (University of Padova), and Masaki Hayashi (University of Calgary) for their thorough and constructive feedback during the review process; and Mohammad Farzamian (INIAV Portugal) for his efficient work as handling editor.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5635">This work is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation via grant no. 212622 for the project “<italic>RADMOGG</italic>:  Resilience and Dynamics of Mountain Groundwater using Gravimetry”  (<uri>https://data.snf.ch/grants/grant/212622</uri>, last access: 1 July 2025).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5647">This paper was edited by Mohammad Farzamian and reviewed by Alastair McClymont, Jacopo Boaga, and Masaki Hayashi.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Amschwand et al.(2024)Amschwand, Scherler, Hoelzle, Krummenacher, Haberkorn, Kienholz, and Gubler</label><mixed-citation>Amschwand, D., Scherler, M., Hoelzle, M., Krummenacher, B., Haberkorn, A., Kienholz, C., and Gubler, H.: Surface heat fluxes at coarse blocky Murtèl rock glacier (Engadine, eastern Swiss Alps), The Cryosphere, 18, 2103–2139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2103-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-18-2103-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Amschwand et al.(2025a)Amschwand, Tschan, Scherler, Hoelzle, Krummenacher, Haberkorn, Kienholz, Aschwanden, and Gubler</label><mixed-citation>Amschwand, D., Tschan, S., Scherler, M., Hoelzle, M., Krummenacher, B., Haberkorn, A., Kienholz, C., Aschwanden, L., and Gubler, H.: Seasonal ice storage changes and meltwater generation at Murtèl rock glacier (Engadine, eastern Swiss Alps): estimates from measurements and energy budgets in the coarse blocky active layer, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2219–2253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2219-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-29-2219-2025</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Amschwand et al.(2025b)Amschwand, Wicky, Scherler, Hoelzle, Krummenacher, Haberkorn, Kienholz, and Gubler</label><mixed-citation>Amschwand, D., Wicky, J., Scherler, M., Hoelzle, M., Krummenacher, B., Haberkorn, A., Kienholz, C., and Gubler, H.: Sub-surface processes and heat fluxes at coarse blocky Murtèl rock glacier (Engadine, eastern Swiss Alps): seasonal ice and convective cooling render rock glaciers climate-robust, Earth Surf. Dynam., 13, 365–401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-365-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-13-365-2025</ext-link>, 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Arenson et al.(2002)Arenson, Hoelzle, and Springman</label><mixed-citation>Arenson, L., Hoelzle, M., and Springman, S.: Borehole deformation measurements and internal structure of some rock glaciers in Switzerland, Permafrost Periglac., 13, 117–135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.414" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.414</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Arenson et al.(2010)Arenson, Hauck, Hilbich, Seward, Yamamoto, and Springman</label><mixed-citation> Arenson, L. U., Hauck, C., Hilbich, C., Seward, L., Yamamoto, Y., and Springman, S. M.: Sub-surface heterogeneities in the Murtèl-Corvatsch rock glacier, Switzerland, in: Proceedings of the joint 63rd Canadian Geotechnical Conference and the 6th Canadian Permafrost Conference (GEO2010), 12–15 September 2010, Calgary (Alberta), Canada, 1494–1500, Canadian Geotechnical Society, CNC-IPA/NRCan, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Arenson et al.(2022)Arenson, Harrington, Koenig, and Wainstein</label><mixed-citation>Arenson, L. U., Harrington, J. S., Koenig, C. E. M., and Wainstein, P. A.: Mountain Permafrost Hydrology – A Practical Review Following Studies from the Andes, Geosciences, 12, 48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/geosciences12020048</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Arnoux et al.(2020)Arnoux, Halloran, Berdat, and Hunkeler</label><mixed-citation>Arnoux, M., Halloran, L. J. S., Berdat, E., and Hunkeler, D.: Characterizing seasonal groundwater storage in alpine catchments using time-lapse gravimetry, water stable isotopes and water balance methods, Hydrol. Process., 34, 4319–4333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13884" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.13884</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Azócar and Brenning(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Azócar, G. F. and Brenning, A.: Hydrological and geomorphological significance of rock glaciers in the dry Andes, Chile (27°–33° S), Permafrost Periglac., 21, 42–53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.669</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bandou et al.(2022)Bandou, Schlunegger, Kissling, Marti, Schwenk, Schläfli, Douillet, and Mair</label><mixed-citation>Bandou, D., Schlunegger, F., Kissling, E., Marti, U., Schwenk, M., Schläfli, P., Douillet, G., and Mair, D.: Three-dimensional gravity modelling of a Quaternary overdeepening fill in the Bern area of Switzerland discloses two stages of glacial carving, Sci. Rep., 12, 1441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04830-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-022-04830-x</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bandou(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Bandou, D. T.: Overdeepenings in the Bern region, Switzerland: Understanding their formation processes using 3D gravity forward modelling, PhD thesis, Universität Bern, Bern, <uri>https://boristheses.unibe.ch/4573/</uri> (last access: 1 October 2024​​​​​​​), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Barandun et al.(2020)Barandun, Fiddes, Scherler, Mathys, Saks, Petrakov, and Hoelzle</label><mixed-citation>Barandun, M., Fiddes, J., Scherler, M., Mathys, T., Saks, T., Petrakov, D., and Hoelzle, M.: The state and future of the cryosphere in Central Asia, Water Security, 11, 100072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100072</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Barsch and Hell(1975)</label><mixed-citation> Barsch, D. and Hell, G.: Photogrammetrische Bewegungsmessungen am Blockgletscher Murtèl I, Oberengadin, Schweizer Alpen, Zeitschrift für Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie, 11, 111–142, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Bast et al.(2024)Bast, Kenner, and Phillips</label><mixed-citation>Bast, A., Kenner, R., and Phillips, M.: Short-term cooling, drying, and deceleration of an ice-rich rock glacier, The Cryosphere, 18, 3141–3158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3141-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-18-3141-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Binley et al.(2015)Binley, Hubbard, Huisman, Revil, Robinson, Singha, and Slater</label><mixed-citation>Binley, A., Hubbard, S. S., Huisman, J. A., Revil, A., Robinson, D. A., Singha, K., and Slater, L. D.: The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales, Water Resour. Res., 51, 3837–3866, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015WR017016</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Bodin et al.(2010)Bodin, Rojas, and Brenning</label><mixed-citation>Bodin, X., Rojas, F., and Brenning, A.: Status and evolution of the cryosphere in the Andes of Santiago (Chile, 33.5° S.), Geomorphology, 118, 453–464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.02.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.02.016</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Breili and Pettersen(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Breili, K. and Pettersen, B. R.: Effects of surface snow cover on gravimetric observations, J. Geodyn., 48, 16–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jog.2009.04.001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Brenning(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Brenning, A.: Geomorphological, hydrological and climatic significance of rock glaciers in the Andes of Central Chile (33–35° S), Permafrost Periglac., 16, 231–240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.528" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.528</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Brenning and Azócar(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Brenning, A. and Azócar, G. F.: Statistical analysis of topographic and climatic controls and multispectral signatures of rock glaciers in the dry Andes, Chile (27°–33° S), Permafrost Periglac., 21, 54–66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.670" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.670</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Brighenti et al.(2019)Brighenti, Tolotti, Bruno, Engel, Wharton, Cerasino, Mair, and Bertoldi</label><mixed-citation>Brighenti, S., Tolotti, M., Bruno, M. C., Engel, M., Wharton, G., Cerasino, L., Mair, V., and Bertoldi, W.: After the peak water: the increasing influence of rock glaciers on alpine river systems, Hydrol. Process., 33, 2804–2823, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13533" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.13533</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Burger et al.(1999)Burger, Degenhardt, and Giardino</label><mixed-citation>Burger, K., Degenhardt, J., and Giardino, J.: Engineering geomorphology of rock glaciers, Geomorphology, 31, 93–132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00074-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00074-4</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Caputo and Pieri(1968)</label><mixed-citation> Caputo, M. and Pieri, L.: The normal gravity formula and the polar flattening according to geodetic reference system 1967, Ann. Geophys., 21, 123–149, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Chaffaut et al.(2022)Chaffaut, Lesparre, Masson, Hinderer, Viville, Bernard, Ferhat, and Cotel</label><mixed-citation>Chaffaut, Q., Lesparre, N., Masson, F., Hinderer, J., Viville, D., Bernard, J.-D., Ferhat, G., and Cotel, S.: Hybrid Gravimetry to Map Water Storage Dynamics in a Mountain Catchment, Frontiers in Water, 3, 715298, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.715298" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/frwa.2021.715298</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Christensen et al.(2020)Christensen, Hayashi, and Bentley</label><mixed-citation>Christensen, C. W., Hayashi, M., and Bentley, L. R.: Hydrogeological characterization of an alpine aquifer system in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, Hydrogeol. J., 28, 1871–1890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02153-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-020-02153-7</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Church et al.(2019)Church, Bauder, Grab, Rabenstein, Singh, and Maurer</label><mixed-citation>Church, G., Bauder, A., Grab, M., Rabenstein, L., Singh, S., and Maurer, H.: Detecting and characterising an englacial conduit network within a temperate Swiss glacier using active seismic, ground penetrating radar and borehole analysis, Ann. Glaciol., 60, 193–205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.19" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2019.19</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Cody et al.(2020)Cody, Draebing, McColl, Cook, and Brideau</label><mixed-citation>Cody, E., Draebing, D., McColl, S., Cook, S., and Brideau, M.-A.: Geomorphology and geological controls of an active paraglacial rockslide in the New Zealand Southern Alps, Landslides, 17, 755–776, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01316-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10346-019-01316-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Corte(1976)</label><mixed-citation>Corte, A.: The Hydrological Significance of Rock Glaciers, J. Glaciol., 17, 157–158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000030859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S0022143000030859</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Corte(1987)</label><mixed-citation> Corte, A. E.: Central Andes rock glaciers: Applied aspects, in: Rock glaciers, edited by: Giardino, J. R., Shroder Jr., J. E., and Vitek, J. D., 289–303, Allen &amp; Unwin, Boston, EID: 2-s2.0-0023585460 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Delaloye et al.(2010)Delaloye, Lambiel, and Gärtner-Roer</label><mixed-citation>Delaloye, R., Lambiel, C., and Gärtner-Roer, I.: Overview of rock glacier kinematics research in the Swiss Alps, Geogr. Helv., 65, 135–145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-65-135-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gh-65-135-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Dow et al.(2020)Dow, McCormack, Young, Greenbaum, Roberts, and Blankenship</label><mixed-citation>Dow, C., McCormack, F., Young, D., Greenbaum, J., Roberts, J., and Blankenship, D.: Totten Glacier subglacial hydrology determined from geophysics and modeling, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 531, 115961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115961" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115961</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Draebing(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Draebing, D.: Application of refraction seismics in alpine permafrost studies: A review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 155, 136–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.006</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Egli et al.(2021)Egli, Irving, and Lane</label><mixed-citation>Egli, P. E., Irving, J., and Lane, S. N.: Characterization of subglacial marginal channels using 3-D analysis of high-density ground-penetrating radar data, J. Glaciol., 67, 759–772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.26" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2021.26</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Fierz et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Fierz, C., Armstrong, R. L., Durand, Y., Etchevers, P., Greene, E., McClung, D. M., Nishimura, K., Satyawali, P. K., and Sokratov, S. A.: The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground, Tech. Rep. 83, UNESCO Working Series SC-2009/WS/15, UNESCO-IHP, Paris, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Francis(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Francis, O.: Performance assessment of the relative gravimeter Scintrex CG-6, J. Geodesy, 95, 116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01572-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00190-021-01572-y</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Gerlach et al.(2017)Gerlach, Ackermann, Falk, Lothhammer, and Reinhold</label><mixed-citation>Gerlach, C., Ackermann, C., Falk, R., Lothhammer, A., and Reinhold, A.: Gravimetric Investigations at Vernagtferner, Springer International Publishing, 53–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2017_2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/1345_2017_2</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Godio, A(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Godio, A: An overview on cryogeophysics in the Alpine environment, B. Geofis. Teor. Appl., 61, 3–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4430/bgta0304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4430/bgta0304</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Godio et al.(2006)Godio, Strobbia, and De Bacco</label><mixed-citation>Godio, A., Strobbia, C., and De Bacco, G.: Geophysical characterisation of a rockslide in an alpine region, Eng. Geol., 83, 273–286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.034</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Gottlieb and Mankin(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Gottlieb, A. R. and Mankin, J. S.: Evidence of human influence on Northern Hemisphere snow loss, Nature, 625, 293–300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06794-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-023-06794-y</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Haeberli(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Haeberli, W. (Ed.): Pilot analysis of permafrost cores from the active rock  glacier Murtèl I, Piz Corvatsch, Eastern Swiss Alps. A workshop report., no. 9 in Arbeitsheft, VAW/ETH Zürich, <uri>https://www.opac.gr.ch/discovery/fulldisplay?context=L&amp;vid=41BGR_INST:41BGR_V1&amp;search_scope=MyInstitution&amp;tab=LibraryCatalog&amp;docid=alma990000017690206696</uri> (last access: 15 August 2025), 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Haeberli and Vonder Mühll(1996)</label><mixed-citation> Haeberli, W. and Vonder Mühll, D.: On the characteristics and possible origins of ice in rock glacier permafrost, Z.  Geomorph. Supp., 104, 43–57, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Haeberli et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation> Haeberli, W., Hoelzle, M., Kääb, A., Keller, F., Vonder Mühll, D., and  Wagner, S.: Ten years after drilling through the permafrost of the active rock glacier Murtèl, eastern Swiss Alps: Answered questions and new perspectives, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Permafrost, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada, 23–27 June 1998, edited by: Lewkowicz, A. G. and Allard, M., Centre d'Études Nordiques, Université Laval (Québec), Canada, 403–410, ISBN: 2920197576, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Haeberli et al.(2006)Haeberli, Hallet, Arenson, Elconin, Humlum, Kääb, Kaufmann, Ladanyi, Matsuoka, Springman, and Mühll</label><mixed-citation>Haeberli, W., Hallet, B., Arenson, L., Elconin, R., Humlum, O., Kääb, A., Kaufmann, V., Ladanyi, B., Matsuoka, N., Springman, S., and Mühll, D. V.: Permafrost creep and rock glacier dynamics, Permafrost Periglac., 17, 189–214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.561</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Haeberli et al.(2017)Haeberli, Schaub, and Huggel</label><mixed-citation>Haeberli, W., Schaub, Y., and Huggel, C.: Increasing risks related to landslides from degrading permafrost into new lakes in de-glaciating mountain ranges, Geomorphology, 293, 405–417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.009</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Halla et al.(2021)Halla, Blöthe, Tapia Baldis, Trombotto Liaudat, Hilbich, Hauck, and Schrott</label><mixed-citation>Halla, C., Blöthe, J. H., Tapia Baldis, C., Trombotto Liaudat, D., Hilbich, C., Hauck, C., and Schrott, L.: Ice content and interannual water storage changes of an active rock glacier in the dry Andes of Argentina, The Cryosphere, 15, 1187–1213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1187-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-15-1187-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Halloran(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Halloran, L. J.: Improving groundwater storage change estimates using  time-lapse gravimetry with Gravi4GW, Environ. Modell. Softw., 150, 105340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105340</ext-link>, 2022 (code available at: <uri>https://github.com/lhalloran/Gravi4GW</uri>, last access: 25 August 2025).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Halloran(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Halloran, L.: Data and code snippets related to Halloran and Amschwand (2025), The Cryosphere, Zenodo [data set/code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16880964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.16880964</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Halloran et al.(2023)Halloran, Millwater, Hunkeler, and Arnoux</label><mixed-citation>Halloran, L. J., Millwater, J., Hunkeler, D., and Arnoux, M.: Climate change impacts on groundwater discharge-dependent streamflow in an alpine headwater catchment, Sci. Total Environ., 902, 166009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166009</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Hartl et al.(2023)Hartl, Zieher, Bremer, Stocker-Waldhuber, Zahs, Höfle, Klug, and Cicoira</label><mixed-citation>Hartl, L., Zieher, T., Bremer, M., Stocker-Waldhuber, M., Zahs, V., Höfle, B., Klug, C., and Cicoira, A.: Multi-sensor monitoring and data integration reveal cyclical destabilization of the Äußeres Hochebenkar rock glacier, Earth Surf. Dynam., 11, 117–147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-117-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-11-117-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Hauck(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Hauck, C.: New concepts in geophysical surveying and data interpretation for permafrost terrain, Permafrost Periglac., 24, 131–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.1774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.1774</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Hauck and Kneisel(2008)</label><mixed-citation> Hauck, C. and Kneisel, C.: Applied geophysics in periglacial environments, Cambridge university press, Cambridge, UK, ISBN: 978-0521889667, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Hausmann et al.(2007)Hausmann, Krainer, Brückl, and Mostler</label><mixed-citation>Hausmann, H., Krainer, K., Brückl, E., and Mostler, W.: Internal structure and ice content of Reichenkar rock glacier (Stubai Alps, Austria) assessed by geophysical investigations, Permafrost Periglac., 18, 351–367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.601</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Hayashi(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Hayashi, M.: Alpine hydrogeology: The critical role of groundwater in sourcing the headwaters of the world, Groundwater, 58, 498–510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12965" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gwat.12965</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Hock et al.(2022)Hock, Rasul, Adler, Cáceres, Gruber, Hirabayashi, Jackson, Kääb, Kang, Kutuzov, Milner, Molau, Morin, Orlove, and Steltzer</label><mixed-citation>Hock, R., Rasul, G., Adler, C., Cáceres, B., Gruber, S., Hirabayashi, Y., Jackson, M., Kääb, A., Kang, S., Kutuzov, S., Milner, A., Molau, U., Morin, S., Orlove, B., and Steltzer, H.: High Mountain Areas, in: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, chap. 4, edited by: Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D. C., Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E., Mintenbeck, K., Alegrìa, A., Nicolai, M., Okem, A., Petzold, J., Rama B., and Weyer, N. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 131–202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157964.004</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Hoelzle et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Hoelzle, M., Mühll, D. V., and Haeberli, W.: Thirty years of permafrost research in the Corvatsch–Furtschellas area, Eastern Swiss Alps: A review, Norsk Geogr. Tidsskr., 56, 137–145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/002919502760056468" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/002919502760056468</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Hoelzle et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation> Hoelzle, M., Barandun, M., Bolch, T., Fiddes, J., Gafurov, A., Muccione, V.,  Saks, T., and Shahgedanova, M.: The status and role of the alpine cryosphere in Central Asia, in: The Aral Sea Basin: Water for Sustainable Development in Central Asia, edited by: Xenarios, S., Schmidt-Vogt, D., Qadir, M., Janusz-Pawletta, B., and Abdullaev, I., Earthscan Series on Major River Basins of the World, chap. 8, Routledge, London and New York, 100–121, ISBN: 978-0521889667, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Hugonnet et al.(2021)Hugonnet, McNabb, Berthier, Menounos, Nuth, Girod, Farinotti, Huss, Dussaillant, Brun, and Kääb</label><mixed-citation>Hugonnet, R., McNabb, R., Berthier, E., Menounos, B., Nuth, C., Girod, L., Farinotti, D., Huss, M., Dussaillant, I., Brun, F., and Kääb, A.: Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the early twenty-first century, Nature, 592, 726–731, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03436-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-021-03436-z</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Humlum(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Humlum, O.: Active layer thermal regime at three rock glaciers in Greenland, Permafrost Periglac., 8, 383–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1530(199710/12)8:4&lt;383::AID-PPP265&gt;3.0.CO;2-V" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1530(199710/12)8:4&lt;383::AID-PPP265&gt;3.0.CO;2-V</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Janke et al.(2017)Janke, Ng, and Bellisario</label><mixed-citation>Janke, J. R., Ng, S., and Bellisario, A.: An inventory and estimate of water stored in firn fields, glaciers, debris-covered glaciers, and rock glaciers in the Aconcagua River Basin, Chile, Geomorphology, 296, 142–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.002</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Jaramillo et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Jaramillo, F., Aminjafari, S., Castellazzi, P., Fleischmann, A., Fluet-Chouinard, E., Hashemi, H., Hubinger, C., Martens, H. R., Papa, F., Schöne, T., Tarpanelli, A., Virkki, V., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Abarca-del Rio, R., Borsa, A., Destouni, G., Di Baldassarre, G., Moore, M.-L., Posada-Marín, J. A., Wdowinski, S., Werth, S., Allen, G. H., Argus, D., Elmi, O., Fenoglio, L., Frappart, F., Huggins, X., Kalantari, Z., Munier, S., Palomino-Ángel, S., Robinson, A., Rubiano, K., Siles, G., Simard, M., Song, C., Spence, C., Tourian, M. J., Wada, Y., Wang, C., Wang, J., Yao, F., Berghuijs, W. R., Cretaux, J.-F., Famiglietti, J., Fassoni-Andrade, A., Fayne, J. V., Girard, F., Kummu, M., Larson, K. M., Marañon, M., Moreira, D. M., Nielsen, K., Pavelsky, T., Pena, F., Reager, J. T., Rulli, M. C., and Salazar, J. F.: The Potential of Hydrogeodesy to Address Water-Related and Sustainability Challenges, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2023WR037020, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR037020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023WR037020</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Jeelani et al.(2024)Jeelani, Hassan, Padhya, Deshpande, Dimri, and Lone</label><mixed-citation>Jeelani, G., Hassan, W., Padhya, V., Deshpande, R., Dimri, A., and Lone, S. A.: Significant role of permafrost in regional hydrology of the Upper Indus Basin, India, Sci. Total Environ., 919, 170863, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170863" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170863</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Jones et al.(2018a)Jones, Harrison, Anderson, and Betts</label><mixed-citation>Jones, D., Harrison, S., Anderson, K., and Betts, R. A.: Mountain rock glaciers contain globally significant water stores, Nature Scientific Reports, 8, 2834, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21244-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-21244-w</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Jones et al.(2018b)Jones, Harrison, Anderson, Selley, Wood, and Betts</label><mixed-citation>Jones, D., Harrison, S., Anderson, K., Selley, H., Wood, J., and Betts, R.: The distribution and hydrological significance of rock glaciers in the Nepalese Himalaya, Global Planet. Change, 160, 123–142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.11.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.11.005</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Jones et al.(2019)Jones, Harrison, Anderson, and Whalley</label><mixed-citation>Jones, D. B., Harrison, S., Anderson, K., and Whalley, W. B.: Rock glaciers and mountain hydrology: A review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 193, 66–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.001</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Karthe et al.(2015)Karthe, Chalov, and Borchardt</label><mixed-citation>Karthe, D., Chalov, S., and Borchardt, D.: Water resources and their management in central Asia in the early twenty first century: status, challenges and future prospects, Environ. Earth Sci., 73, 487–499, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3789-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12665-014-3789-1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Klügel and Wziontek(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Klügel, T. and Wziontek, H.: Correcting gravimeters and tiltmeters for atmospheric mass attraction using operational weather models, J. Geodyn., 48, 204–210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.010</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Kudryavtsev(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Kudryavtsev, S. M.: Improved harmonic development of the Earth tide-generating potential, J. Geodesy, 77, 829–838, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-003-0361-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00190-003-0361-2</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>LaFehr(1991)</label><mixed-citation>LaFehr, T. R.: Standardization in gravity reduction, Geophysics, 56, 1170–1178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.1443137</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Loranger et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Loranger, B., Doré, G., Fortier, D., and Lemieux, C.: Massive Ice and Ice-Rich Soil Detection by Gravimetric Surveying at Dry Creek, Southwestern Yukon Territory, Canada, in: Cold Regions Engineering 2015, American Society of Civil Engineers, Salt Lake City, Utah, 46–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479315.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/9780784479315.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Louis et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Louis, C., Halloran, L. J. S., and Roques, C.: Seasonal and diurnal freeze–thaw dynamics of a rock glacier and their impacts on mixing and solute transport, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1505–1523, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1505-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-29-1505-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Manchado et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Manchado, A. M.-T., Allen, S., Cicoira, A., Wiesmann, S., Haller, R., and Stoffel, M.: 100 years of monitoring in the Swiss National Park reveals overall decreasing rock glacier velocities, Communications Earth and Environment, 5, 138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01302-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-024-01302-0</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Marcer et al.(2021)Marcer, Cicoira, Cusicanqui, Bodin, Echelard, Obregon, and Schoeneich</label><mixed-citation>Marcer, M., Cicoira, A., Cusicanqui, D., Bodin, X., Echelard, T., Obregon, R., and Schoeneich, P.: Rock glaciers throughout the French Alps accelerated and destabilised since 1990 as air temperatures increased, Communications Earth and Environment, 2, 81, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00150-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-021-00150-6</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Marchenko et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Marchenko, S., Romanovsky, V., and Gorbunov, A.: Hydrologic and thermal regimes of coarse blocky materials in Tien Shan Mountains, Central Asia, in: Extended abstracts of the 10th International Conference on Permafrost, 25–29 June 2012, Salekhard (Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District), Russia, edited by: Hinkel, K. M. and Melnikov, V. P., 4, 361–362, Fort Dialog-Iset, Ekaterinburg, Russia, ISBN: 9785911280529, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Marchenko et al.(2024)Marchenko, Jin, Hoelzle, Lentschke, Kasatkin, and Saks</label><mixed-citation> Marchenko, S., Jin, H., Hoelzle, M., Lentschke, J., Kasatkin, N., and Saks, T.: Thermal and hydrologic regimes of blocky materials in Tianshan Mountains, Central Asia, in: Proceedings vol. II (Extendend Abstracts) of the 12th International Conference on Permafrost, 16–20 June 2024, Whitehorse (Yukon), Canada, edited by: Beddoe, R. and Karunaratne, K., International Permafrost Association, 455–456, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Mathys et al.(2024)Mathys, Azimshoev, Bektursunov, Hauck, Hilbich, Duishonakunov, Kayumov, Kassatkin, Kapitsa, Martin, Mollaret, Navruzshoev, Pohl, Saks, Silmonov, Musaev, Usubaliev, and Hoelzle</label><mixed-citation>Mathys, T., Azimshoev, M., Bektursunov, Z., Hauck, C., Hilbich, C., Duishonakunov, M., Kayumov, A., Kassatkin, N., Kapitsa, V., Martin, L. C. P., Mollaret, C., Navruzshoev, H., Pohl, E., Saks, T., Silmonov, I., Musaev, T., Usubaliev, R., and Hoelzle, M.: Quantifying permafrost ground ice contents in the Tien Shan and Pamir (Central Asia): A Petrophysical Joint Inversion approach using the Geometric Mean model, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2795" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2024-2795</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Maurer and Hauck(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Maurer, H. and Hauck, C.: Geophysical imaging of alpine rock glaciers, J. Glaciol., 53, 110–120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756507781833893" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756507781833893</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>McClymont et al.(2010)McClymont, Hayashi, Bentley, Muir, and Ernst</label><mixed-citation>McClymont, A. F., Hayashi, M., Bentley, L. R., Muir, D., and Ernst, E.: Groundwater flow and storage within an alpine meadow-talus complex, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 859–872, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-859-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-14-859-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>McClymont et al.(2012)McClymont, Hayashi, Bentley, and Liard</label><mixed-citation>McClymont, A. F., Hayashi, M., Bentley, L. R., and Liard, J.: Locating and characterising groundwater storage areas within an alpine watershed using time-lapse gravity, GPR and seismic refraction methods, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1792–1804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9316" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.9316</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Mewes et al.(2017)Mewes, Hilbich, Delaloye, and Hauck</label><mixed-citation>Mewes, B., Hilbich, C., Delaloye, R., and Hauck, C.: Resolution capacity of geophysical monitoring regarding permafrost degradation induced by hydrological processes, The Cryosphere, 11, 2957–2974, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2957-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-11-2957-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Millar et al.(2015)Millar, Westfall, Evenden, Holmquist, Schmidt-Gengenbach, Franklin, Nachlinger, and Delany</label><mixed-citation>Millar, C. I., Westfall, R. D., Evenden, A., Holmquist, J. G., Schmidt-Gengenbach, J., Franklin, R. S., Nachlinger, J., and Delany, D. L.: Potential climatic refugia in semi-arid, temperate mountains: Plant and arthropod assemblages associated with rock glaciers, talus slopes, and their forefield wetlands, Sierra Nevada, California, USA, Quatern. Int., 387, 106–121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.11.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quaint.2013.11.003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Mollaret et al.(2019)Mollaret, Hilbich, Pellet, Flores-Orozco, Delaloye, and Hauck</label><mixed-citation>Mollaret, C., Hilbich, C., Pellet, C., Flores-Orozco, A., Delaloye, R., and Hauck, C.: Mountain permafrost degradation documented through a network of permanent electrical resistivity tomography sites, The Cryosphere, 13, 2557–2578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2557-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-13-2557-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Mollaret et al.(2020)Mollaret, Wagner, Hilbich, Scapozza, and Hauck</label><mixed-citation>Mollaret, C., Wagner, F. M., Hilbich, C., Scapozza, C., and Hauck, C.: Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents, Front. Earth Sci., 8, 85, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2020.00085</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Moritz(1980)</label><mixed-citation>Moritz, H.: Geodetic reference system 1980, B. Geod., 54, 395–405, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521480" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02521480</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Müller et al.(2014)Müller, Gärtner-Roer, Kenner, Thee, and Morche</label><mixed-citation>Müller, J., Gärtner-Roer, I., Kenner, R., Thee, P., and Morche, D.: Sediment storage and transfer on a periglacial mountain slope (Corvatsch, Switzerland), Geomorphology, 218, 35–44, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.002</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Nagy(1966)</label><mixed-citation>Nagy, D.: The prism method for terrain corrections using digital computers, Pure Appl. Geophys., 63, 31–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00875156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00875156</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Noetzli and Pellet(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Noetzli, J. and Pellet, C. (Eds.): PERMOS 2023. Swiss Permafrost Bulletin 2022 (Annual report No. 4 on permafrost observation in the Swiss Alps), Cryospheric Commission of the Swiss Academy of Sciences, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13093/permos-bull-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13093/permos-bull-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Nowell(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Nowell, D. A. G.: Gravity terrain corrections – an overview, J. Appl. Geophys., 42, 117–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00028-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00028-2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Pavoni et al.(2023)Pavoni, Boaga, Carrera, Zuecco, Carturan, and Zumiani</label><mixed-citation>Pavoni, M., Boaga, J., Carrera, A., Zuecco, G., Carturan, L., and Zumiani, M.: Brief communication: Mountain permafrost acts as an aquitard during an infiltration experiment monitored with electrical resistivity tomography time-lapse measurements, The Cryosphere, 17, 1601–1607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1601-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-17-1601-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Rangecroft et al.(2015)Rangecroft, Harrison, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>Rangecroft, S., Harrison, S., and Anderson, K.: Rock Glaciers as Water Stores in the Bolivian Andes: An Assessment of Their Hydrological Importance, Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 47, 89–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1657/AAAR0014-029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1657/AAAR0014-029</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Rau et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Rau, G. C., Eulenfeld, T., Howe, D., Rietbroek, R., Gosselin, J.-S., Staniewicz, S., and TaylorDixonHD: hydrogeoscience/pygtide: PyGTide v0.7.1, Version v0.7.1, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6673581" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6673581</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Reato et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Reato, A., Silvina Carol, E., Cottescu, A., and Alfredo Martínez, O.: Hydrological significance of rock glaciers and other periglacial landforms as sustenance of wet meadows in the Patagonian Andes, J. S. Am. Earth Sci., 111, 103471, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103471" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103471</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Rodell and Reager(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Rodell, M. and Reager, J. T.: Water cycle science enabled by the GRACE and GRACE-FO satellite missions, Nature Water, 1, 47–59, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-022-00005-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s44221-022-00005-0</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Rogger et al.(2017)Rogger, Chirico, Hausmann, Krainer, Brückl, Stadler, and Blöschl</label><mixed-citation>Rogger, M., Chirico, G. B., Hausmann, H., Krainer, K., Brückl, E., Stadler, P., and Blöschl, G.: Impact of mountain permafrost on flow path and runoff response in a high alpine catchment, Water Resour. Res., 53, 1288–1308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019341" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016WR019341</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Scapozza et al.(2011)Scapozza, Lambiel, Baron, Marescot, and Reynard</label><mixed-citation>Scapozza, C., Lambiel, C., Baron, L., Marescot, L., and Reynard, E.: Internal structure and permafrost distribution in two alpine periglacial talus slopes, Valais, Swiss Alps, Geomorphology, 132, 208–221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.05.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.05.010</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Schaffer and MacDonell(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Schaffer, N. and MacDonell, S.: Brief communication: A framework to classify glaciers for water resource evaluation and management in the Southern Andes, The Cryosphere, 16, 1779–1791, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1779-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-16-1779-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Schaffer et al.(2019)Schaffer, MacDonell, Réveillet, Yáñez, and Valois</label><mixed-citation>Schaffer, N., MacDonell, S., Réveillet, M., Yáñez, E., and Valois, R.: Rock glaciers as a water resource in a changing climate in the semiarid Chilean Andes, Reg. Environ. Change, 19, 1263–1279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-01459-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10113-018-01459-3</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Scherler et al.(2014)Scherler, Schneider, Hoelzle, and Hauck</label><mixed-citation>Scherler, M., Schneider, S., Hoelzle, M., and Hauck, C.: A two-sided approach to estimate heat transfer processes within the active layer of the Murtèl–Corvatsch rock glacier, Earth Surf. Dynam., 2, 141–154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2-141-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-2-141-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Schneider et al.(2012)Schneider, Hoelzle, and Hauck</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, S., Hoelzle, M., and Hauck, C.: Influence of surface and subsurface heterogeneity on observed borehole temperatures at a mountain permafrost site in the Upper Engadine, Swiss Alps, The Cryosphere, 6, 517–531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-517-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-6-517-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Schneider et al.(2013)Schneider, Daengeli, Hauck, and Hoelzle</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, S., Daengeli, S., Hauck, C., and Hoelzle, M.: A spatial and temporal analysis of different periglacial materials by using geoelectrical, seismic and borehole temperature data at Murtèl–Corvatsch, Upper Engadin, Swiss Alps, Geogr. Helv., 68, 265–280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-265-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gh-68-265-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Scintrex(2018)</label><mixed-citation> Scintrex: Autograv CG-6 Manual, Scintrex Ltd., Concord, ON, document ID: 888700, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Somers and McKenzie(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Somers, L. D. and McKenzie, J. M.: A review of groundwater in high mountain environments, WIREs Water, 7, e1475, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wat2.1475</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Springman et al.(2012)Springman, Arenson, Yamamoto, Maurer, Kos, Buchli, and Derungs</label><mixed-citation>Springman, S. M., Arenson, L. U., Yamamoto, Y., Maurer, H., Kos, A., Buchli, T., and Derungs, G.: Multidisciplinary investigations on three rock glaciers in the swiss alps: legacies and future perspectives, Geograf. Ann. A, 94, 215–243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0459.2012.00464.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-0459.2012.00464.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Sternai et al.(2019)Sternai, Sue, Husson, Serpelloni, Becker, Willett, Faccenna, Di Giulio, Spada, Jolivet, Valla, Petit, Nocquet, Walpersdorf, and Castelltort</label><mixed-citation>Sternai, P., Sue, C., Husson, L., Serpelloni, E., Becker, T. W., Willett, S. D., Faccenna, C., Di Giulio, A., Spada, G., Jolivet, L., Valla, P., Petit, C., Nocquet, J.-M., Walpersdorf, A., and Castelltort, S.: Present-day uplift of the European Alps: Evaluating mechanisms and models of their relative contributions, Earth-Sci. Rev., 190, 589–604, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.01.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.01.005</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Swisstopo(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Swisstopo: Gravimetric Atlas of Switzerland <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://opendata.swiss/en/dataset/gravimetrischer-atlas-der-schweiz-1-100000">https://opendata.swiss/en/dataset/gravimetrischer-atlas-</ext-link><ext-link xlink:href="https://opendata.swiss/en/dataset/gravimetrischer-atlas-der-schweiz-1-100000">der-schweiz-1-100000</ext-link> (last access: 1 November 2024​​​​​​​), 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Swisstopo(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Swisstopo: National Gravity Network, <uri>https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/national-gravity-network</uri> (last access: 1 November 2024​​​​​​​), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Talwani(1973)</label><mixed-citation>Talwani, M.: Computer Usage in the Computation of Gravity Anomalies, in: Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, vol. 13, Elsevier, 343–389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-460813-9.50014-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-12-460813-9.50014-X</ext-link>, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>van Tiel et al.(2024)van Tiel, Aubry-Wake, Somers, Andermann, Avanzi, Baraer, Chiogna, Daigre, Das, Drenkhan, Farinotti, Fyffe, de Graaf, Hanus, Immerzeel, Koch, McKenzie, Müller, Popp, Saidaliyeva, Schaefli, Schilling, Teagai, Thornton, and Yapiyev</label><mixed-citation>van Tiel, M., Aubry-Wake, C., Somers, L., Andermann, C., Avanzi, F., Baraer, M., Chiogna, G., Daigre, C., Das, S., Drenkhan, F., Farinotti, D., Fyffe, C. L., de Graaf, I., Hanus, S., Immerzeel, W., Koch, F., McKenzie, J. M., Müller, T., Popp, A. L., Saidaliyeva, Z., Schaefli, B., Schilling, O. S., Teagai, K., Thornton, J. M., and Yapiyev, V.: Cryosphere – groundwater connectivity is a missing link in the mountain water cycle, Nature Water, 2, 624–637, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00277-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s44221-024-00277-8</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Voigt et al.(2021)Voigt, Schulz, Koch, Wetzel, Timmen, Rehm, Pflug, Stolarczuk, Förste, and Flechtner</label><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Schulz, K., Koch, F., Wetzel, K.-F., Timmen, L., Rehm, T., Pflug, H., Stolarczuk, N., Förste, C., and Flechtner, F.: Technical note: Introduction of a superconducting gravimeter as novel hydrological sensor for the Alpine research catchment Zugspitze, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5047–5064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5047-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-25-5047-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Vonder Mühll and Haeberli(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Vonder Mühll, D. and Haeberli, W.: Thermal characteristics of the permafrost within an active rock glacier (Murtèl/Corvatsch, Grisons, Swiss Alps), J. Glaciol., 36, 151–158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000009382" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S0022143000009382</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Vonder Mühll(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Vonder Mühll, D. S.: Evidence of intrapermafrost groundwater flow beneath an active rock glacier in the Swiss Alps, Permafrost Periglac., 3, 169–173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430030216" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.3430030216</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Vonder Mühll(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Vonder Mühll, D. S.: Geophysikalische Untersuchungen im Permafrost des Oberengadins, PhD thesis, Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie (VAW), ETH Zürich, <uri>https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/ba365b39-a006-497f-b263-669748322635</uri> (last access: 1 November 2024​​​​​​​), 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Vonder Mühll and Holub(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Vonder Mühll, D. S. and Holub, P.: Borehole logging in alpine permafrost, upper Engadin, Swiss Alps, Permafrost Periglac., 3, 125–132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430030209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.3430030209</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Vonder Mühll and Klingelé(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Vonder Mühll, D. S. and Klingelé, E. E.: Gravimetrical investigation of ice-rich permafrost within the rock glacier Murtèl-Corvatsch (upper Engadin, Swiss Alps), Permafrost Periglac., 5, 13–24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430050103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.3430050103</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Vonder Mühll et al.(2000)Vonder Mühll, Hauck, and Lehmann</label><mixed-citation>Vonder Mühll, D. S., Hauck, C., and Lehmann, F.: Verification of geophysical models in Alpine permafrost using borehole information, Ann. Glaciol., 31, 300–306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781820057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756400781820057</ext-link>, 2000. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Wagner et al.(2016)Wagner, Pauritsch, and Winkler</label><mixed-citation>Wagner, T., Pauritsch, M., and Winkler, G.: Impact of relict rock glaciers on spring and stream flow of alpine watersheds: Examples of the Niedere Tauern Range, Eastern Alps (Austria), Austrian J. Earth Sci., 109, 84–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17738/ajes.2016.0006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17738/ajes.2016.0006</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Wakonigg(1996)</label><mixed-citation> Wakonigg, H.: Unterkühlte Schutthalden [Undercooled talus], Arbeiten aus dem Institut für Geographie der Karl-Franzens Universität Graz, 33, 209–223, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Wenzel(1996)</label><mixed-citation> Wenzel, H. G.: The nanogal software: Earth tide data processing package ETERNA 3.30, Bull. Inf. Marées Terrestres, 124, 9425–9439, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Woo(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Woo, M.-K.: Sustaining Groundwater Resources: A Critical Element in the Global Water Crisis, chap. Linking Runoff to Groundwater in Permafrost Terrain, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 119–129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3426-7_8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-90-481-3426-7_8</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Zahorec et al.(2024)Zahorec, Papčo, Greco, Vajda, Pašteka, Cantarero, and Carbone</label><mixed-citation>Zahorec, P., Papčo, J., Greco, F., Vajda, P., Pašteka, R., Cantarero, M., and Carbone, D.: Observation and local prediction of the vertical gravity gradient: Review paper, IEEE Instru. Meas. Mag., 27, 11–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2024.10654722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/MIM.2024.10654722</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Investigating seasonal and multi-decadal water/ice storage changes in the Murtèl rock glacier using time-lapse gravimetry</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Amschwand et al.(2024)Amschwand, Scherler, Hoelzle, Krummenacher, Haberkorn, Kienholz, and
Gubler</label><mixed-citation>
       Amschwand, D., Scherler, M., Hoelzle, M., Krummenacher, B., Haberkorn, A., Kienholz, C.,
and Gubler, H.: Surface heat fluxes at coarse blocky Murtèl rock glacier (Engadine, eastern Swiss Alps), The
Cryosphere, 18, 2103–2139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2103-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2103-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Amschwand et al.(2025a)Amschwand, Tschan, Scherler, Hoelzle, Krummenacher, Haberkorn, Kienholz, Aschwanden,
and Gubler</label><mixed-citation>
       Amschwand, D., Tschan, S., Scherler, M., Hoelzle, M., Krummenacher, B., Haberkorn, A.,
Kienholz, C., Aschwanden, L., and Gubler, H.: Seasonal ice storage changes and meltwater generation at Murtèl rock
glacier (Engadine, eastern Swiss Alps): estimates from measurements and energy budgets in the coarse blocky active
layer, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2219–2253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2219-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2219-2025</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Amschwand et al.(2025b)Amschwand, Wicky, Scherler, Hoelzle, Krummenacher, Haberkorn, Kienholz, and
Gubler</label><mixed-citation>
       Amschwand, D., Wicky, J., Scherler, M., Hoelzle, M., Krummenacher, B., Haberkorn, A.,
Kienholz, C., and Gubler, H.: Sub-surface processes and heat fluxes at coarse blocky Murtèl rock glacier
(Engadine, eastern Swiss Alps): seasonal ice and convective cooling render rock glaciers climate-robust, Earth
Surf. Dynam., 13, 365–401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-365-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-365-2025</a>, 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Arenson et al.(2002)Arenson, Hoelzle, and Springman</label><mixed-citation>
       Arenson, L., Hoelzle, M., and
Springman, S.: Borehole deformation measurements and internal structure of some rock glaciers in Switzerland,
Permafrost Periglac., 13, 117–135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.414" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.414</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Arenson et al.(2010)Arenson, Hauck, Hilbich, Seward, Yamamoto, and Springman</label><mixed-citation>
       Arenson, L. U.,
Hauck, C., Hilbich, C., Seward, L., Yamamoto, Y., and Springman, S. M.: Sub-surface heterogeneities in the
Murtèl-Corvatsch rock glacier, Switzerland, in: Proceedings of the joint 63rd Canadian Geotechnical Conference
and the 6th Canadian Permafrost Conference (GEO2010), 12–15 September 2010, Calgary (Alberta), Canada, 1494–1500,
Canadian Geotechnical Society, CNC-IPA/NRCan, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Arenson et al.(2022)Arenson, Harrington, Koenig, and Wainstein</label><mixed-citation>
       Arenson, L. U.,
Harrington, J. S., Koenig, C. E. M., and Wainstein, P. A.: Mountain Permafrost Hydrology – A Practical Review
Following Studies from the Andes, Geosciences, 12, 48, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020048</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Arnoux et al.(2020)Arnoux, Halloran, Berdat, and Hunkeler</label><mixed-citation>
       Arnoux, M., Halloran, L. J. S.,
Berdat, E., and Hunkeler, D.: Characterizing seasonal groundwater storage in alpine catchments using time-lapse
gravimetry, water stable isotopes and water balance methods, Hydrol. Process., 34, 4319–4333,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13884" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13884</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Azócar and Brenning(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Azócar, G. F. and Brenning, A.: Hydrological and
geomorphological significance of rock glaciers in the dry Andes, Chile (27°–33°&thinsp;S), Permafrost Periglac., 21,
42–53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.669</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bandou et al.(2022)Bandou, Schlunegger, Kissling, Marti, Schwenk, Schläfli, Douillet, and
Mair</label><mixed-citation>
       Bandou, D., Schlunegger, F., Kissling, E., Marti, U., Schwenk, M.,
Schläfli, P., Douillet, G., and Mair, D.: Three-dimensional gravity modelling of a Quaternary overdeepening fill
in the Bern area of Switzerland discloses two stages of glacial carving, Sci. Rep., 12, 1441,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04830-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04830-x</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bandou(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Bandou, D. T.: Overdeepenings in the Bern region, Switzerland:
Understanding their formation processes using 3D gravity forward modelling, PhD thesis, Universität Bern,
Bern, <a href="https://boristheses.unibe.ch/4573/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 October 2024​​​​​​​), 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Barandun et al.(2020)Barandun, Fiddes, Scherler, Mathys, Saks, Petrakov, and Hoelzle</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barandun, M., Fiddes, J., Scherler, M., Mathys, T., Saks, T., Petrakov, D., and Hoelzle, M.: The state and future of
the cryosphere in Central Asia, Water Security, 11, 100072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100072" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100072</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Barsch and Hell(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
       Barsch, D. and Hell, G.: Photogrammetrische Bewegungsmessungen am
Blockgletscher Murtèl I, Oberengadin, Schweizer Alpen, Zeitschrift für Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie,
11, 111–142, 1975.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Bast et al.(2024)Bast, Kenner, and Phillips</label><mixed-citation>
       Bast, A., Kenner, R., and Phillips, M.: Short-term
cooling, drying, and deceleration of an ice-rich rock glacier, The Cryosphere, 18, 3141–3158,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3141-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3141-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Binley et al.(2015)Binley, Hubbard, Huisman, Revil, Robinson, Singha, and Slater</label><mixed-citation>
       Binley, A.,
Hubbard, S. S., Huisman, J. A., Revil, A., Robinson, D. A., Singha, K., and Slater, L. D.: The emergence of
hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales, Water Resour. Res., 51,
3837–3866, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017016</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Bodin et al.(2010)Bodin, Rojas, and Brenning</label><mixed-citation>
       Bodin, X., Rojas, F., and Brenning, A.: Status and
evolution of the cryosphere in the Andes of Santiago (Chile, 33.5°&thinsp;S.), Geomorphology, 118, 453–464,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.02.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.02.016</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Breili and Pettersen(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Breili, K. and Pettersen, B. R.: Effects of surface snow
cover on gravimetric observations, J. Geodyn., 48, 16–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.04.001</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Brenning(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
       Brenning, A.: Geomorphological, hydrological and climatic significance of rock
glaciers in the Andes of Central Chile (33–35°&thinsp;S), Permafrost Periglac., 16, 231–240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.528" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.528</a>,
2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Brenning and Azócar(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Brenning, A. and Azócar, G. F.: Statistical analysis
of topographic and climatic controls and multispectral signatures of rock glaciers in the dry Andes, Chile
(27°–33°&thinsp;S), Permafrost Periglac., 21, 54–66, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.670" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.670</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Brighenti et al.(2019)Brighenti, Tolotti, Bruno, Engel, Wharton, Cerasino, Mair, and
Bertoldi</label><mixed-citation>
       Brighenti, S., Tolotti, M., Bruno, M. C., Engel, M., Wharton, G., Cerasino, L., Mair, V.,
and Bertoldi, W.: After the peak water: the increasing influence of rock glaciers on alpine river systems,
Hydrol. Process., 33, 2804–2823, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13533" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13533</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Burger et al.(1999)Burger, Degenhardt, and Giardino</label><mixed-citation>
       Burger, K., Degenhardt, J., and
Giardino, J.: Engineering geomorphology of rock glaciers, Geomorphology, 31, 93–132,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00074-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00074-4</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Caputo and Pieri(1968)</label><mixed-citation>
       Caputo, M. and Pieri, L.: The normal gravity formula and the
polar flattening according to geodetic reference system 1967, Ann. Geophys., 21, 123–149, 1968.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Chaffaut et al.(2022)Chaffaut, Lesparre, Masson, Hinderer, Viville, Bernard, Ferhat, and Cotel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chaffaut, Q., Lesparre, N., Masson, F., Hinderer, J., Viville, D., Bernard, J.-D., Ferhat, G., and Cotel, S.: Hybrid
Gravimetry to Map Water Storage Dynamics in a Mountain Catchment, Frontiers in Water, 3, 715298, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.715298" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.715298</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Christensen et al.(2020)Christensen, Hayashi, and Bentley</label><mixed-citation>
       Christensen, C. W., Hayashi, M.,
and Bentley, L. R.: Hydrogeological characterization of an alpine aquifer system in the Canadian Rocky Mountains,
Hydrogeol. J., 28, 1871–1890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02153-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02153-7</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Church et al.(2019)Church, Bauder, Grab, Rabenstein, Singh, and Maurer</label><mixed-citation>
       Church, G.,
Bauder, A., Grab, M., Rabenstein, L., Singh, S., and Maurer, H.: Detecting and characterising an englacial conduit
network within a temperate Swiss glacier using active seismic, ground penetrating radar and borehole analysis,
Ann. Glaciol., 60, 193–205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.19" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.19</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Cody et al.(2020)Cody, Draebing, McColl, Cook, and Brideau</label><mixed-citation>
       Cody, E., Draebing, D.,
McColl, S., Cook, S., and Brideau, M.-A.: Geomorphology and geological controls of an active paraglacial rockslide in
the New Zealand Southern Alps, Landslides, 17, 755–776, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01316-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01316-2</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Corte(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
       Corte, A.: The Hydrological Significance of Rock Glaciers, J. Glaciol., 17, 157–158,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000030859" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000030859</a>, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Corte(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Corte, A. E.: Central Andes rock glaciers: Applied aspects, in: Rock glaciers, edited by: Giardino, J. R., Shroder Jr., J. E., and Vitek, J. D., 289–303, Allen &amp; Unwin, Boston, EID:&thinsp;2-s2.0-0023585460 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Delaloye et al.(2010)Delaloye, Lambiel, and Gärtner-Roer</label><mixed-citation>
       Delaloye, R., Lambiel, C., and
Gärtner-Roer, I.: Overview of rock glacier kinematics research in the Swiss Alps, Geogr. Helv., 65, 135–145,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-65-135-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-65-135-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Dow et al.(2020)Dow, McCormack, Young, Greenbaum, Roberts, and Blankenship</label><mixed-citation>
       Dow, C.,
McCormack, F., Young, D., Greenbaum, J., Roberts, J., and Blankenship, D.: Totten Glacier subglacial hydrology
determined from geophysics and modeling, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 531, 115961, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115961" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115961</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Draebing(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Draebing, D.: Application of refraction seismics in alpine permafrost studies:
A review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 155, 136–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.006</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Egli et al.(2021)Egli, Irving, and Lane</label><mixed-citation>
       Egli, P. E., Irving, J., and
Lane, S. N.: Characterization of subglacial marginal channels using 3-D analysis of high-density ground-penetrating
radar data, J. Glaciol., 67, 759–772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.26" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.26</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Fierz et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fierz, C., Armstrong, R. L., Durand, Y., Etchevers, P., Greene, E., McClung, D. M., Nishimura, K.,
Satyawali, P. K., and Sokratov, S. A.: The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground,
Tech. Rep. 83, UNESCO Working Series SC-2009/WS/15, UNESCO-IHP, Paris, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Francis(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Francis, O.: Performance assessment of the relative gravimeter
Scintrex CG-6, J. Geodesy, 95, 116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01572-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01572-y</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Gerlach et al.(2017)Gerlach, Ackermann, Falk, Lothhammer, and Reinhold</label><mixed-citation>
       Gerlach, C.,
Ackermann, C., Falk, R., Lothhammer, A., and Reinhold, A.: Gravimetric Investigations at Vernagtferner, Springer
International Publishing, 53–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2017_2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2017_2</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Godio, A(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Godio, A: An overview on cryogeophysics in the Alpine
environment, B. Geofis. Teor. Appl., 61, 3–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4430/bgta0304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4430/bgta0304</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Godio et al.(2006)Godio, Strobbia, and De Bacco</label><mixed-citation>
       Godio, A., Strobbia, C., and
De Bacco, G.: Geophysical characterisation of a rockslide in an alpine region, Eng. Geol., 83, 273–286,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.034</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Gottlieb and Mankin(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Gottlieb, A. R. and Mankin, J. S.: Evidence of human
influence on Northern Hemisphere snow loss, Nature, 625, 293–300, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06794-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06794-y</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Haeberli(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haeberli, W. (Ed.): Pilot analysis of permafrost cores from the active rock  glacier Murtèl I, Piz Corvatsch, Eastern Swiss Alps. A workshop report., no. 9 in Arbeitsheft, VAW/ETH Zürich, <a href="https://www.opac.gr.ch/discovery/fulldisplay?context=L&amp;vid=41BGR_INST:41BGR_V1&amp;search_scope=MyInstitution&amp;tab=LibraryCatalog&amp;docid=alma990000017690206696" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 August 2025), 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Haeberli and Vonder Mühll(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
       Haeberli, W. and Vonder Mühll, D.:
On the characteristics and possible origins of ice in rock glacier permafrost, Z.  Geomorph. Supp., 104, 43–57, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Haeberli et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haeberli, W., Hoelzle, M., Kääb, A., Keller, F., Vonder Mühll, D., and  Wagner, S.: Ten years after drilling through the permafrost of the active rock glacier Murtèl, eastern Swiss Alps: Answered questions and new perspectives, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Permafrost, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada, 23–27 June 1998, edited by: Lewkowicz, A. G. and Allard, M., Centre d'Études Nordiques, Université Laval (Québec), Canada, 403–410, ISBN:&thinsp;2920197576, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Haeberli et al.(2006)Haeberli, Hallet, Arenson, Elconin, Humlum, Kääb, Kaufmann, Ladanyi, Matsuoka,
Springman, and Mühll</label><mixed-citation>
       Haeberli, W., Hallet, B., Arenson, L., Elconin, R., Humlum, O.,
Kääb, A., Kaufmann, V., Ladanyi, B., Matsuoka, N., Springman, S., and Mühll, D. V.: Permafrost creep and
rock glacier dynamics, Permafrost Periglac., 17, 189–214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.561</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Haeberli et al.(2017)Haeberli, Schaub, and Huggel</label><mixed-citation>
       Haeberli, W., Schaub, Y., and Huggel, C.:
Increasing risks related to landslides from degrading permafrost into new lakes in de-glaciating mountain ranges,
Geomorphology, 293, 405–417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.009</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Halla et al.(2021)Halla, Blöthe, Tapia Baldis, Trombotto Liaudat, Hilbich, Hauck, and Schrott</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halla, C., Blöthe, J. H., Tapia Baldis, C., Trombotto Liaudat, D., Hilbich, C., Hauck, C., and Schrott, L.: Ice
content and interannual water storage changes of an active rock glacier in the dry Andes of Argentina, The Cryosphere,
15, 1187–1213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1187-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1187-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Halloran(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halloran, L. J.: Improving groundwater storage change estimates using  time-lapse gravimetry with Gravi4GW, Environ. Modell. Softw., 150, 105340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105340" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105340</a>, 2022 (code available at: <a href="https://github.com/lhalloran/Gravi4GW" target="_blank"/>, last access: 25 August 2025).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Halloran(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halloran, L.: Data and code snippets related to Halloran and Amschwand (2025), The Cryosphere, Zenodo [data set/code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16880964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16880964</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Halloran et al.(2023)Halloran, Millwater, Hunkeler, and Arnoux</label><mixed-citation>
       Halloran, L. J.,
Millwater, J., Hunkeler, D., and Arnoux, M.: Climate change impacts on groundwater discharge-dependent streamflow in
an alpine headwater catchment, Sci. Total Environ., 902, 166009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166009</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Hartl et al.(2023)Hartl, Zieher, Bremer, Stocker-Waldhuber, Zahs, Höfle, Klug, and Cicoira</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hartl, L., Zieher, T., Bremer, M., Stocker-Waldhuber, M., Zahs, V., Höfle, B., Klug, C., and Cicoira, A.:
Multi-sensor monitoring and data integration reveal cyclical destabilization of the Äußeres Hochebenkar rock
glacier, Earth Surf. Dynam., 11, 117–147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-117-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-117-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Hauck(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
       Hauck, C.: New concepts in geophysical surveying and data interpretation for
permafrost terrain, Permafrost Periglac., 24, 131–137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.1774" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.1774</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Hauck and Kneisel(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hauck, C. and Kneisel, C.: Applied geophysics in periglacial environments, Cambridge university press, Cambridge, UK, ISBN:&thinsp;978-0521889667, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Hausmann et al.(2007)Hausmann, Krainer, Brückl, and Mostler</label><mixed-citation>
       Hausmann, H., Krainer, K.,
Brückl, E., and Mostler, W.: Internal structure and ice content of Reichenkar rock glacier (Stubai Alps, Austria)
assessed by geophysical investigations, Permafrost Periglac., 18, 351–367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.601" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.601</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Hayashi(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Hayashi, M.: Alpine hydrogeology: The critical role of groundwater in sourcing
the headwaters of the world, Groundwater, 58, 498–510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12965" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12965</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Hock et al.(2022)Hock, Rasul, Adler, Cáceres, Gruber, Hirabayashi, Jackson, Kääb, Kang, Kutuzov,
Milner, Molau, Morin, Orlove, and Steltzer</label><mixed-citation>
       Hock, R., Rasul, G., Adler, C., Cáceres, B.,
Gruber, S., Hirabayashi, Y., Jackson, M., Kääb, A., Kang, S., Kutuzov, S., Milner, A., Molau, U., Morin, S.,
Orlove, B., and Steltzer, H.: High Mountain Areas, in: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing
Climate, chap. 4, edited by: Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D. C., Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Tignor, M.,
Poloczanska, E., Mintenbeck, K., Alegrìa, A., Nicolai, M., Okem, A., Petzold, J., Rama B., and Weyer, N. M.,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 131–202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.004</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Hoelzle et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoelzle, M., Mühll, D. V., and
Haeberli, W.: Thirty years of permafrost research in the Corvatsch–Furtschellas area, Eastern Swiss Alps: A review,
Norsk Geogr. Tidsskr., 56, 137–145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/002919502760056468" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/002919502760056468</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Hoelzle et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoelzle, M., Barandun, M., Bolch, T., Fiddes, J., Gafurov, A., Muccione, V.,  Saks, T., and Shahgedanova, M.: The status and role of the alpine cryosphere in Central Asia, in: The Aral Sea Basin: Water for Sustainable Development in Central Asia, edited by: Xenarios, S., Schmidt-Vogt, D., Qadir, M., Janusz-Pawletta, B., and Abdullaev, I., Earthscan Series on Major River Basins of the World, chap. 8, Routledge, London and New York, 100–121, ISBN:&thinsp;978-0521889667, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Hugonnet et al.(2021)Hugonnet, McNabb, Berthier, Menounos, Nuth, Girod, Farinotti, Huss, Dussaillant, Brun,
and Kääb</label><mixed-citation>
       Hugonnet, R., McNabb, R., Berthier, E., Menounos, B., Nuth, C., Girod, L.,
Farinotti, D., Huss, M., Dussaillant, I., Brun, F., and Kääb, A.: Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the
early twenty-first century, Nature, 592, 726–731, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03436-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03436-z</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Humlum(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
       Humlum, O.: Active layer thermal regime at three rock glaciers in Greenland,
Permafrost Periglac., 8, 383–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1530(199710/12)8:4&lt;383::AID-PPP265&gt;3.0.CO;2-V" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1530(199710/12)8:4&lt;383::AID-PPP265&gt;3.0.CO;2-V</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Janke et al.(2017)Janke, Ng, and Bellisario</label><mixed-citation>
       Janke, J. R., Ng, S., and Bellisario, A.: An
inventory and estimate of water stored in firn fields, glaciers, debris-covered glaciers, and rock glaciers in the
Aconcagua River Basin, Chile, Geomorphology, 296, 142–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.002</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Jaramillo et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jaramillo, F., Aminjafari, S., Castellazzi, P., Fleischmann, A., Fluet-Chouinard, E., Hashemi, H., Hubinger, C., Martens, H. R., Papa, F., Schöne, T., Tarpanelli, A., Virkki, V., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Abarca-del Rio, R., Borsa, A., Destouni, G., Di Baldassarre, G., Moore, M.-L., Posada-Marín, J. A., Wdowinski, S., Werth, S., Allen, G. H., Argus, D., Elmi, O., Fenoglio, L., Frappart, F., Huggins, X., Kalantari, Z., Munier, S., Palomino-Ángel, S., Robinson, A., Rubiano, K., Siles, G., Simard, M., Song, C., Spence, C., Tourian, M. J., Wada, Y., Wang, C., Wang, J., Yao, F., Berghuijs, W. R., Cretaux, J.-F., Famiglietti, J., Fassoni-Andrade, A., Fayne, J. V., Girard, F., Kummu, M., Larson, K. M., Marañon, M., Moreira, D. M., Nielsen, K., Pavelsky, T., Pena, F., Reager, J. T., Rulli, M. C., and Salazar, J. F.: The Potential of Hydrogeodesy to Address Water-Related and Sustainability Challenges, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2023WR037020, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR037020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR037020</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Jeelani et al.(2024)Jeelani, Hassan, Padhya, Deshpande, Dimri, and Lone</label><mixed-citation>
       Jeelani, G.,
Hassan, W., Padhya, V., Deshpande, R., Dimri, A., and Lone, S. A.: Significant role of permafrost in regional
hydrology of the Upper Indus Basin, India, Sci. Total Environ., 919, 170863, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170863" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170863</a>,
2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Jones et al.(2018a)Jones, Harrison, Anderson, and Betts</label><mixed-citation>
       Jones, D., Harrison, S., Anderson, K.,
and Betts, R. A.: Mountain rock glaciers contain globally significant water stores, Nature Scientific Reports,
8, 2834, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21244-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21244-w</a>, 2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Jones et al.(2018b)Jones, Harrison, Anderson, Selley, Wood, and Betts</label><mixed-citation>
       Jones, D., Harrison, S.,
Anderson, K., Selley, H., Wood, J., and Betts, R.: The distribution and hydrological significance of rock glaciers in
the Nepalese Himalaya, Global Planet. Change, 160, 123–142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.11.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.11.005</a>, 2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Jones et al.(2019)Jones, Harrison, Anderson, and Whalley</label><mixed-citation>
       Jones, D. B., Harrison, S.,
Anderson, K., and Whalley, W. B.: Rock glaciers and mountain hydrology: A review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 193, 66–90,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.001</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Karthe et al.(2015)Karthe, Chalov, and Borchardt</label><mixed-citation>
       Karthe, D., Chalov, S., and
Borchardt, D.: Water resources and their management in central Asia in the early twenty first century: status,
challenges and future prospects, Environ. Earth Sci., 73, 487–499, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3789-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3789-1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Klügel and Wziontek(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Klügel, T. and Wziontek, H.: Correcting
gravimeters and tiltmeters for atmospheric mass attraction using operational weather models, J. Geodyn., 48, 204–210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.010</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Kudryavtsev(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
       Kudryavtsev, S. M.: Improved harmonic development of the Earth
tide-generating potential, J. Geodesy, 77, 829–838, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-003-0361-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-003-0361-2</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>LaFehr(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
       LaFehr, T. R.: Standardization in gravity reduction, Geophysics,
56, 1170–1178, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443137" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443137</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Loranger et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Loranger, B., Doré, G., Fortier, D., and Lemieux, C.: Massive Ice and Ice-Rich Soil Detection by Gravimetric Surveying at Dry Creek, Southwestern Yukon Territory, Canada, in: Cold Regions Engineering 2015, American Society of Civil Engineers, Salt Lake City, Utah, 46–56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479315.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479315.005</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Louis et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Louis, C., Halloran, L. J. S., and
Roques, C.: Seasonal and diurnal freeze–thaw dynamics of a rock glacier and their impacts on mixing and solute transport, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1505–1523, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1505-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1505-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Manchado et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Manchado, A. M.-T., Allen, S., Cicoira, A., Wiesmann, S., Haller, R., and Stoffel, M.: 100 years of monitoring in the Swiss National Park reveals overall decreasing rock glacier velocities, Communications Earth and Environment, 5, 138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01302-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01302-0</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Marcer et al.(2021)Marcer, Cicoira, Cusicanqui, Bodin, Echelard, Obregon, and Schoeneich</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marcer, M., Cicoira, A., Cusicanqui, D., Bodin, X., Echelard, T., Obregon, R., and Schoeneich, P.: Rock glaciers
throughout the French Alps accelerated and destabilised since 1990 as air temperatures increased, Communications Earth
and Environment, 2, 81, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00150-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00150-6</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Marchenko et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marchenko, S., Romanovsky, V., and Gorbunov, A.: Hydrologic and thermal regimes of coarse blocky materials in Tien Shan Mountains, Central Asia, in: Extended abstracts of the 10th International Conference on Permafrost, 25–29 June 2012, Salekhard (Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District), Russia, edited by: Hinkel, K. M. and Melnikov, V. P., 4, 361–362, Fort Dialog-Iset, Ekaterinburg, Russia, ISBN:&thinsp;9785911280529, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Marchenko et al.(2024)Marchenko, Jin, Hoelzle, Lentschke, Kasatkin, and Saks</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marchenko, S., Jin, H., Hoelzle, M., Lentschke, J., Kasatkin, N., and Saks, T.: Thermal and hydrologic regimes of
blocky materials in Tianshan Mountains, Central Asia, in: Proceedings vol. II (Extendend Abstracts) of the 12th
International Conference on Permafrost, 16–20 June 2024, Whitehorse (Yukon), Canada, edited by: Beddoe, R. and
Karunaratne, K., International Permafrost Association, 455–456, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Mathys et al.(2024)Mathys, Azimshoev, Bektursunov, Hauck, Hilbich, Duishonakunov, Kayumov, Kassatkin, Kapitsa,
Martin, Mollaret, Navruzshoev, Pohl, Saks, Silmonov, Musaev, Usubaliev, and Hoelzle</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mathys, T., Azimshoev, M., Bektursunov, Z., Hauck, C., Hilbich, C., Duishonakunov, M., Kayumov, A., Kassatkin, N.,
Kapitsa, V., Martin, L. C. P., Mollaret, C., Navruzshoev, H., Pohl, E., Saks, T., Silmonov, I., Musaev, T.,
Usubaliev, R., and Hoelzle, M.: Quantifying permafrost ground ice contents in the Tien Shan and Pamir (Central Asia):
A Petrophysical Joint Inversion approach using the Geometric Mean model, EGUsphere [preprint],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2795" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2795</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Maurer and Hauck(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
       Maurer, H. and Hauck, C.: Geophysical imaging of alpine rock glaciers,
J. Glaciol., 53, 110–120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756507781833893" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756507781833893</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>McClymont et al.(2010)McClymont, Hayashi, Bentley, Muir, and Ernst</label><mixed-citation>
       McClymont, A. F.,
Hayashi, M., Bentley, L. R., Muir, D., and Ernst, E.: Groundwater flow and storage within an alpine meadow-talus
complex, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 859–872, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-859-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-859-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>McClymont et al.(2012)McClymont, Hayashi, Bentley, and Liard</label><mixed-citation>
       McClymont, A. F., Hayashi, M.,
Bentley, L. R., and Liard, J.: Locating and characterising groundwater storage areas within an alpine watershed using
time-lapse gravity, GPR and seismic refraction methods, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1792–1804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9316" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9316</a>,
2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Mewes et al.(2017)Mewes, Hilbich, Delaloye, and Hauck</label><mixed-citation>
       Mewes, B., Hilbich, C.,
Delaloye, R., and Hauck, C.: Resolution capacity of geophysical monitoring regarding permafrost degradation induced by
hydrological processes, The Cryosphere, 11, 2957–2974, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2957-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2957-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Millar et al.(2015)Millar, Westfall, Evenden, Holmquist, Schmidt-Gengenbach, Franklin, Nachlinger, and
Delany</label><mixed-citation>
       Millar, C. I., Westfall, R. D., Evenden, A., Holmquist, J. G., Schmidt-Gengenbach, J.,
Franklin, R. S., Nachlinger, J., and Delany, D. L.: Potential climatic refugia in semi-arid, temperate mountains:
Plant and arthropod assemblages associated with rock glaciers, talus slopes, and their forefield wetlands, Sierra
Nevada, California, USA, Quatern. Int., 387, 106–121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.11.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.11.003</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Mollaret et al.(2019)Mollaret, Hilbich, Pellet, Flores-Orozco, Delaloye, and Hauck</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mollaret, C., Hilbich, C., Pellet, C., Flores-Orozco, A., Delaloye, R., and Hauck, C.: Mountain permafrost degradation
documented through a network of permanent electrical resistivity tomography sites, The Cryosphere, 13, 2557–2578,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2557-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2557-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Mollaret et al.(2020)Mollaret, Wagner, Hilbich, Scapozza, and Hauck</label><mixed-citation>
       Mollaret, C.,
Wagner, F. M., Hilbich, C., Scapozza, C., and Hauck, C.: Petrophysical Joint Inversion Applied to Alpine Permafrost
Field Sites to Image Subsurface Ice, Water, Air, and Rock Contents, Front. Earth Sci., 8, 85, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00085" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00085</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Moritz(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
       Moritz, H.: Geodetic reference system 1980, B. Geod., 54, 395–405,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521480" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521480</a>, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Müller et al.(2014)Müller, Gärtner-Roer, Kenner, Thee, and Morche</label><mixed-citation>
       Müller, J.,
Gärtner-Roer, I., Kenner, R., Thee, P., and Morche, D.: Sediment storage and transfer on a periglacial mountain
slope (Corvatsch, Switzerland), Geomorphology, 218, 35–44, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.002</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Nagy(1966)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nagy, D.: The prism method for terrain corrections using digital computers, Pure
Appl. Geophys., 63, 31–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00875156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00875156</a>, 1966.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Noetzli and Pellet(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Noetzli, J. and Pellet, C. (Eds.): PERMOS 2023. Swiss
Permafrost Bulletin 2022 (Annual report No. 4 on permafrost observation in the Swiss Alps), Cryospheric Commission
of the Swiss Academy of Sciences, <a href="https://doi.org/10.13093/permos-bull-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13093/permos-bull-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Nowell(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nowell, D. A. G.: Gravity terrain corrections – an overview, J.
Appl. Geophys., 42, 117–134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00028-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00028-2</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Pavoni et al.(2023)Pavoni, Boaga, Carrera, Zuecco, Carturan, and Zumiani</label><mixed-citation>
       Pavoni, M.,
Boaga, J., Carrera, A., Zuecco, G., Carturan, L., and Zumiani, M.: Brief communication: Mountain permafrost acts as an
aquitard during an infiltration experiment monitored with electrical resistivity tomography time-lapse measurements,
The Cryosphere, 17, 1601–1607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1601-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1601-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Rangecroft et al.(2015)Rangecroft, Harrison, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>
       Rangecroft, S., Harrison, S., and
Anderson, K.: Rock Glaciers as Water Stores in the Bolivian Andes: An Assessment of Their Hydrological Importance,
Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 47, 89–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1657/AAAR0014-029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1657/AAAR0014-029</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Rau et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rau, G. C., Eulenfeld, T., Howe, D., Rietbroek, R., Gosselin, J.-S., Staniewicz, S., and TaylorDixonHD: hydrogeoscience/pygtide: PyGTide v0.7.1, Version v0.7.1, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6673581" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6673581</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Reato et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Reato, A.,
Silvina Carol, E., Cottescu, A., and Alfredo Martínez, O.: Hydrological significance of rock glaciers and
other periglacial landforms as sustenance of wet meadows in the Patagonian Andes, J. S. Am. Earth Sci., 111, 103471,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103471" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103471</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Rodell and Reager(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Rodell, M. and Reager, J. T.: Water cycle science enabled by the
GRACE and GRACE-FO satellite missions, Nature Water, 1, 47–59, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-022-00005-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-022-00005-0</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Rogger et al.(2017)Rogger, Chirico, Hausmann, Krainer, Brückl, Stadler, and Blöschl</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rogger, M., Chirico, G. B., Hausmann, H., Krainer, K., Brückl, E., Stadler, P., and Blöschl, G.: Impact of
mountain permafrost on flow path and runoff response in a high alpine catchment, Water Resour. Res., 53, 1288–1308,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019341" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019341</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Scapozza et al.(2011)Scapozza, Lambiel, Baron, Marescot, and Reynard</label><mixed-citation>
       Scapozza, C.,
Lambiel, C., Baron, L., Marescot, L., and Reynard, E.: Internal structure and permafrost distribution in two alpine
periglacial talus slopes, Valais, Swiss Alps, Geomorphology, 132, 208–221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.05.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.05.010</a>,
2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Schaffer and MacDonell(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       Schaffer, N. and MacDonell, S.: Brief communication: A
framework to classify glaciers for water resource evaluation and management in the Southern Andes, The Cryosphere, 16,
1779–1791, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1779-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1779-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Schaffer et al.(2019)Schaffer, MacDonell, Réveillet, Yáñez, and Valois</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schaffer, N., MacDonell, S., Réveillet, M., Yáñez, E., and Valois, R.: Rock glaciers as a water resource
in a changing climate in the semiarid Chilean Andes, Reg. Environ. Change, 19, 1263–1279,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-01459-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-01459-3</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Scherler et al.(2014)Scherler, Schneider, Hoelzle, and Hauck</label><mixed-citation>
       Scherler, M., Schneider, S.,
Hoelzle, M., and Hauck, C.: A two-sided approach to estimate heat transfer processes within the active layer of the
Murtèl–Corvatsch rock glacier, Earth Surf. Dynam., 2, 141–154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2-141-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2-141-2014</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Schneider et al.(2012)Schneider, Hoelzle, and Hauck</label><mixed-citation>
       Schneider, S., Hoelzle, M., and
Hauck, C.: Influence of surface and subsurface heterogeneity on observed borehole temperatures at a mountain
permafrost site in the Upper Engadine, Swiss Alps, The Cryosphere, 6, 517–531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-517-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-517-2012</a>,
2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Schneider et al.(2013)Schneider, Daengeli, Hauck, and Hoelzle</label><mixed-citation>
       Schneider, S., Daengeli, S.,
Hauck, C., and Hoelzle, M.: A spatial and temporal analysis of different periglacial materials by using geoelectrical,
seismic and borehole temperature data at Murtèl–Corvatsch, Upper Engadin, Swiss Alps, Geogr. Helv., 68, 265–280,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-265-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-265-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Scintrex(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scintrex: Autograv CG-6 Manual, Scintrex Ltd., Concord, ON, document ID:&thinsp;888700, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Somers and McKenzie(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Somers, L. D. and McKenzie, J. M.: A review of groundwater in high
mountain environments, WIREs Water, 7, e1475, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1475</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Springman et al.(2012)Springman, Arenson, Yamamoto, Maurer, Kos, Buchli, and Derungs</label><mixed-citation>
      
Springman, S. M., Arenson, L. U., Yamamoto, Y., Maurer, H., Kos, A., Buchli, T., and Derungs, G.: Multidisciplinary
investigations on three rock glaciers in the swiss alps: legacies and future perspectives, Geograf. Ann. A, 94,
215–243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0459.2012.00464.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0459.2012.00464.x</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Sternai et al.(2019)Sternai, Sue, Husson, Serpelloni, Becker, Willett, Faccenna, Di Giulio, Spada, Jolivet,
Valla, Petit, Nocquet, Walpersdorf, and Castelltort</label><mixed-citation>
       Sternai, P., Sue, C., Husson, L., Serpelloni, E.,
Becker, T. W., Willett, S. D., Faccenna, C., Di Giulio, A., Spada, G., Jolivet, L., Valla, P., Petit, C.,
Nocquet, J.-M., Walpersdorf, A., and Castelltort, S.: Present-day uplift of the European Alps: Evaluating mechanisms
and models of their relative contributions, Earth-Sci. Rev., 190, 589–604, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.01.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.01.005</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Swisstopo(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Swisstopo: Gravimetric Atlas of Switzerland 1:100000,  <a href="https://opendata.swiss/en/dataset/gravimetrischer-atlas-der-schweiz-1-100000" target="_blank">https://opendata.swiss/en/dataset/gravimetrischer-atlas-</a><a href="https://opendata.swiss/en/dataset/gravimetrischer-atlas-der-schweiz-1-100000" target="_blank">der-schweiz-1-100000</a> (last access: 1 November 2024​​​​​​​), 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Swisstopo(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Swisstopo: National Gravity Network,
<a href="https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/national-gravity-network" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 November 2024​​​​​​​), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Talwani(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
       Talwani, M.: Computer Usage in the Computation of Gravity
Anomalies, in: Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, vol. 13, Elsevier, 343–389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-460813-9.50014-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-460813-9.50014-X</a>, 1973.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>van Tiel et al.(2024)van Tiel, Aubry-Wake, Somers, Andermann, Avanzi, Baraer, Chiogna, Daigre, Das,
Drenkhan, Farinotti, Fyffe, de Graaf, Hanus, Immerzeel, Koch, McKenzie, Müller, Popp, Saidaliyeva, Schaefli,
Schilling, Teagai, Thornton, and Yapiyev</label><mixed-citation>
       van Tiel, M., Aubry-Wake, C., Somers, L., Andermann, C.,
Avanzi, F., Baraer, M., Chiogna, G., Daigre, C., Das, S., Drenkhan, F., Farinotti, D., Fyffe, C. L., de Graaf, I.,
Hanus, S., Immerzeel, W., Koch, F., McKenzie, J. M., Müller, T., Popp, A. L., Saidaliyeva, Z., Schaefli, B.,
Schilling, O. S., Teagai, K., Thornton, J. M., and Yapiyev, V.: Cryosphere – groundwater connectivity is a missing
link in the mountain water cycle, Nature Water, 2, 624–637, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00277-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00277-8</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Voigt et al.(2021)Voigt, Schulz, Koch, Wetzel, Timmen, Rehm, Pflug, Stolarczuk, Förste, and
Flechtner</label><mixed-citation>
       Voigt, C., Schulz, K., Koch, F., Wetzel, K.-F., Timmen, L., Rehm, T., Pflug, H.,
Stolarczuk, N., Förste, C., and Flechtner, F.: Technical note: Introduction of a superconducting gravimeter as
novel hydrological sensor for the Alpine research catchment Zugspitze, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5047–5064,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5047-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5047-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Vonder Mühll and Haeberli(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
       Vonder Mühll, D. and Haeberli, W.:
Thermal characteristics of the permafrost within an active rock glacier (Murtèl/Corvatsch, Grisons, Swiss Alps),
J. Glaciol., 36, 151–158, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000009382" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000009382</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Vonder Mühll(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
       Vonder Mühll, D. S.: Evidence of intrapermafrost
groundwater flow beneath an active rock glacier in the Swiss Alps, Permafrost Periglac., 3, 169–173,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430030216" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430030216</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Vonder Mühll(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
       Vonder Mühll, D. S.: Geophysikalische Untersuchungen im
Permafrost des Oberengadins, PhD thesis, Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie (VAW), ETH
Zürich, <a href="https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/ba365b39-a006-497f-b263-669748322635" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 November 2024​​​​​​​), 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Vonder Mühll and Holub(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
       Vonder Mühll, D. S. and Holub, P.: Borehole
logging in alpine permafrost, upper Engadin, Swiss Alps, Permafrost Periglac., 3, 125–132,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430030209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430030209</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Vonder Mühll and Klingelé(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
       Vonder Mühll, D. S. and
Klingelé, E. E.: Gravimetrical investigation of ice-rich permafrost within the rock glacier Murtèl-Corvatsch
(upper Engadin, Swiss Alps), Permafrost Periglac., 5, 13–24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430050103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430050103</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Vonder Mühll et al.(2000)Vonder Mühll, Hauck, and Lehmann</label><mixed-citation>
       Vonder Mühll, D. S.,
Hauck, C., and Lehmann, F.: Verification of geophysical models in Alpine permafrost using borehole information,
Ann. Glaciol., 31, 300–306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781820057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781820057</a>, 2000.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Wagner et al.(2016)Wagner, Pauritsch, and Winkler</label><mixed-citation>
       Wagner, T., Pauritsch, M., and Winkler, G.:
Impact of relict rock glaciers on spring and stream flow of alpine watersheds: Examples of the Niedere Tauern Range,
Eastern Alps (Austria), Austrian J. Earth Sci., 109, 84–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.17738/ajes.2016.0006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17738/ajes.2016.0006</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Wakonigg(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
       Wakonigg, H.: Unterkühlte Schutthalden [Undercooled talus], Arbeiten aus
dem Institut für Geographie der Karl-Franzens Universität Graz, 33, 209–223, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>Wenzel(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
       Wenzel, H. G.: The nanogal software: Earth tide data processing package ETERNA
3.30, Bull. Inf. Marées Terrestres, 124, 9425–9439, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>Woo(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
       Woo, M.-K.: Sustaining Groundwater Resources: A Critical Element in the Global Water
Crisis, chap. Linking Runoff to Groundwater in Permafrost Terrain, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 119–129,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3426-7_8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3426-7_8</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Zahorec et al.(2024)Zahorec, Papčo, Greco, Vajda, Pašteka, Cantarero, and Carbone</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zahorec, P., Papčo, J., Greco, F., Vajda, P., Pašteka, R., Cantarero, M., and Carbone, D.: Observation and
local prediction of the vertical gravity gradient: Review paper, IEEE Instru. Meas. Mag., 27, 11–16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2024.10654722" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2024.10654722</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
