<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-19-1469-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Spectral characteristics of seismic ambient vibrations reveal changes in the subglacial environment of Glacier de la Plaine Morte, Switzerland</article-title><alt-title>Spectral characteristics of seismic ambient vibrations reveal changes</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>van Ginkel</surname><given-names>Janneke</given-names></name>
          <email>janneke.vanginkel@sed.ethz.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7601-5119</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Walter</surname><given-names>Fabian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6952-2761</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Lindner</surname><given-names>Fabian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1697-2838</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Hallo</surname><given-names>Miroslav</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5865-7767</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Huss</surname><given-names>Matthias</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2377-6923</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fäh</surname><given-names>Donat</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Swiss Seismological Service SED, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Mountain Hydrology and Mass Movement, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Section of Strong Motion Seismology, Disaster Prevention Research Institute (DPRI), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW), ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Janneke van Ginkel (janneke.vanginkel@sed.ethz.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>April</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1469</fpage><lpage>1490</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>6</day><month>March</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>February</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>January</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>May</month><year>2024</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Janneke van Ginkel et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e157">Glaciers exhibit complex hydraulic and dynamic behaviour that needs to be studied to enhance our understanding of cryospheric changes. To address this, we apply a range of passive seismic analysis techniques to continuous data from a temporary seismic array deployed on Glacier de la Plaine Morte, Switzerland. First, we assess the reliability of ambient noise horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) measurements and demonstrate  that the variations in HVSR curves are predominantly attributed to changing nearby noise conditions influenced by hydraulic, drainage-related tremors, moulin resonances,  and anthropogenic sources. We find that short time series (e.g. hours-long) may lead to biases in the interpretation of the HVSR curve. Hence, we perform an analysis of the local noise source variations related to glacier dynamic behaviour in order to distinguish between source and medium changes reflected in the HVSR measurements. In 130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long time series of measurements we are able to detect a spatio-temporal trend and find that an HVSR trough emerges following the sudden drainage of an ice-marginal lake. This HVSR trough is indicative of a low-seismic-velocity layer at the ice–bed interface. Seismic velocity changes derived by interferometry support our findings of a velocity drop in the glacier after the drainage. Subsequently, inversion and forward modelling of the empirical dispersion and ellipticity curves reveal a probable thickness of this low-velocity layer of 10–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a change in shear-wave velocity up to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This layer has a local extent covering an estimated 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the glacier, as indicated by the spatial variations in the HVSR trough throughout the array and an independent water volume estimate. Our findings suggest that the changing seismic velocities are a manifestation of temporal subglacial water storage in response to the sudden injection of lake water. Our results highlight the value of long time series of HVSR measurements which show variations in the peak and trough structure that reflect hydrological changes in the subglacial environment.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich</funding-source>
<award-id>Postdoctoral Fellowship</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding-source>
<award-id>LI3721/2-1</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Japan Society for the Promotion of Science</funding-source>
<award-id>P23070</award-id>
<award-id>23KF0149</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e211">On the Earth, climate fluctuations are expected to cause significant impacts on glaciers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.1"/> and the potential for natural hazards <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.2"/>. The behaviour of ice masses is significantly influenced by geological, thermodynamic, and hydraulic processes occurring at the basal interface. Nevertheless, the hardly accessible nature of the ice–bedrock interface makes mapping of its heterogeneity a challenge. Ground-penetrating radar <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.3"/> and active seismic techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.4"/> are commonly used for an investigation of physical properties of the subsurface glacier mass. These methods are not suited for repeated surveys within significant timescales capturing hydraulic changes over weeks to months. Moreover, the extent to which these methods retrieve spatio-temporal basal properties that affect ice flow is debated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e229">An alternative way to monitor glacial conditions with high spatio-temporal resolution and relatively low-cost acquisition is by analysing sustained ambient seismic vibrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.6"/>. Studies have shown that the seismic power measured on glaciers can serve as a proxy for subglacial discharge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.7"/> and the hydraulic conditions in the subglacial conduits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.8"/>. Furthermore, the glaciohydraulic tremors can also be used to map the water pathways beneath glaciers in space and time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.9"/>. In addition to that, seismic interferometry can monitor subglacial properties such as ice anisotropy and bedrock material by probing subsurface seismic velocities and changes thereof <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.10"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.11"/> was able to extract transient velocity changes over 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> related to the surging cycle of Bering Glacier (Alaska), which he attributes to the transition of an efficient channelized to an inefficient distributed drainage system (and vice versa).</p>
      <p id="d2e259">In earthquake seismology, the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) analysis of ambient vibrations (i.e. seismic noise) is a widely applied technique that is used to determine a site's resonance frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as well as its peak amplitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.12"/>. The HVSR provides information on subsurface properties like shear-wave (S-wave) velocities, layer thickness, and site response to incident seismic waves (i.e. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx75" id="altparen.13"/>). HVSR measurements are purely passive and thus non-invasive for the environment and only require a single station deployment. The HVSR is obtained by calculating the ratio between the Fourier amplitude spectra of the horizontal and vertical components of a seismic recording <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.14"/>. HVSRs are typically calculated over a range of frequencies,  giving rise to an “HVSR curve” with a characteristic peak–trough structure. The ambient vibration diffuse wavefield has a significant contribution of Rayleigh waves, which are dispersive seismic surface waves with elliptical particle motion that depends on the subsurface structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.15"/>. Small contributions of Love and body waves may include the wavefield and contribute to the peaks in the HVSR curve by amplifying horizontal ground motion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.16"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e289">In cryoseismology, the HVSR curves have been used to invert for velocity profiles of the ice or firn <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.17"/>, to obtain bedrock topography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.18"/>, and to identify the presence of basal sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.19"/>. These studies present HVSR curve computations for short time periods (1–12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, seismic resonances within the soft ice layer and resulting HVSRs are expected to vary with changes in subglacial conditions on diurnal and seasonal timescales. Seismic wave velocities decrease in the presence of drained basal sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.20"/>, water, or air <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.21"/>, making them dependent on the geological setting as well as spatial and temporal variations in hydraulic  conditions. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.22"/> found that seasonality in HVSR is related to the variability  in the active permafrost layer. At the same time, pitfalls in HVSR measurements exist in permafrost monitoring as they are influenced by changing noise conditions in addition to freeze–thaw variations within the soil. Consequently, given varying thermal and hydraulic conditions in cryospheric processes, short-period recordings of ambient seismic vibrations can lead to biases in HVSR curves.</p>
      <p id="d2e320">Here we apply the HVSR method to seismic records of Glacier de la Plaine Morte, Europe's largest plateau glacier in Switzerland's Bernese Alps <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.23"/>. Variations in the peak–trough structure of the HVSR curve reflect hydraulic changes beneath the ice surface, and we support this finding with additional noise-based seismic analysis. We interpret these changes in terms of temporary water storage as a response to the subglacial drainage of a nearby ice-marginal lake. Our results underline the value of passive seismic noise measurement and the HVSR method to monitor hydrological changes in the glacier in the subglacial environment. Here, we define the subglacial environment as the area near the ice–bed interface, which can encompass fractures and voids in the glacier sole as well as the top layer of the bedrock or sediments.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e328"><bold>(a)</bold> Orthophoto of Glacier de la Plaine Morte (source: Federal Office of Topography Swisstopo) with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> array (stations PM01–PM06, red triangles), the lake (Lac des Faverges) in blue, the drainage moulin (green cross),  and the Rezligletscher tongue from which the Trüebbach stream starts (orange circle). The inset in the top-right corner shows the glacier's location within Switzerland. <bold>(b)</bold> Time-lapse camera image of Lac des Faverges taken on 27 August 2016 (day 240) at 07:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (local time) just before the drainage (source: Geopraevent, personal communication, 2023). <bold>(c)</bold> Time-lapse camera image of Lac des Faverges taken on 6 October 2016 at 08:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1 month after the drainage (source Geopraevent). <bold>(d)</bold> Lac des Faverges volume curve and the dashed grey lines include the drainage period for which the lake volume and discharge is computed. The pre-drainage and drainage periods are marked, as well as the onset of the drainage (green triangle). <bold>(e)</bold> Lac des Faverges discharge curve (black), modelled mean daily melt-induced discharge (grey), Trüebbach stage (blue), and precipitation measured at Adelboden (red bars, relative values).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Setting and data</title>
      <p id="d2e387">Glacier de la Plaine Morte (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) is the largest plateau glacier in the European Alps and is located along the border of Switzerland's cantons of Bern and Valais. Ice flow is limited,  and minor crevasses are mostly observed on the outlet glacier Rezligletscher <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.24"/>. From the 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wide plateau, the Rezligletscher tongue flows northwards feeding the Trüebbach stream, which produces several proglacial waterfalls towards the northwest (outside of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). A lake, named Lac des Faverges, formed during the melt season at the southeastern margin of Glacier de la Plaine Morte (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b). Since 2011, outbursts of Lac des Faverges have caused floods in the Simme Valley <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.25"/>. In 2012, a detailed monitoring of lake-level variations, as well as proglacial discharge level, was initiated for early-warning purposes by the municipality of Lenk and the engineering company Geopraevent (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d and e). The relation of water level to lake volume was inferred from digital elevation models acquired after each lake drainage. High-resolution lake-level records during the drainage allow us to determine the lake discharge dynamics during the drainage events. In addition, there exist daily surface melt estimates based on long-term, seasonal,  in situ mass balance measurements at a network of sites, extrapolated and temporally downscaled with a distributed accumulation and melt model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.26"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e416">In 2016, Lac des Faverges' drainage initiated through a moulin at the lake margin (green cross in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) feeding the subglacial drainage system towards the glacier tongue <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.27"/>. The drainage began on 27 August 2016 (day of year 240) in the evening, lasted approximately 6 consecutive days,  and amounted to a volume of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of water (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d). In the first 6 h of the drainage, the water escaped rapidly with a discharge of 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e). After the discharge peak, the lake level dropped to the elevation of the moulin inlet, and the connection between the moulin and the lake was disrupted. Subsequently, the lake established a new link with the moulin through a supraglacial channel, but this slowed down the drainage process. The drainage of the lake finished in the night from day 246 to 247.</p>
      <p id="d2e471">Multiple seismic arrays were deployed on Glacier de la Plaine Morte during the summer of 2016 (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx48" id="altparen.28"/>, for deployment and instrument details). In this study, we use the Lennartz 1 Hz shallow borehole array (PM01–PM06), located 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> north of Lac des Faverges, deployed from late April (day 120) to early September (day 250) 2016. At the end of July (day 212), a sixth borehole sensor was added to the array (PM06; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). We process the three-component seismic data within the frequency range of 0.5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a focus on extracting the fundamental seismic resonance frequency of the ice mass using HVSR curves. Over the 4-month recording period, we distinguish a pre-drainage phase (day 120–240) and drainage phase (day 240–248), which is subsequently divided into smaller phases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), depending on the power spectral characteristics and knowledge of the subglacial processes from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx48" id="text.29"/>. We observe glacial hydraulic tremors already from day 237 onwards until the start of the drainage (day 240), when pressure is building up and fractures and conduits are formed. These are pre-drainage precursor hydraulic tremors that formed subglacial features like fractures and voids that enable the drainage later on. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.30"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.31"/>, seismic tremors in the frequency range of 1–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are linked to the turbulent water flow and sediment transport within subglacial conduits. In the spectrogram, anthropogenic seismic signals are present at approximately 3–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and are characterized by a diurnal pattern (power maxima from 06:00 to 18:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on weekdays (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e537"><bold>(a)</bold> Spectrogram of station PM02 for the entire recording period. The pre-and post-drainage periods are highlighted, and the triangles indicate some high-power events like the drainage onset (green), moulin resonance (grey),  and hydraulic tremor (blue). <bold>(b)</bold> Zoom of the pre-drainage period showing anthropogenic noise. <bold>(c)</bold> Zoom of the drainage period and preceding hydraulic tremor.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>HVSR analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e562">We compute hourly-averaged power spectra (PSDs) for the vertical and horizontal components at all stations in the Glacier de la Plaine Morte array for days 120–248 following the methodology described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.32"/> to derive the spectral ratios. Ambient noise records of 1 h long time windows with 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> overlap <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.33"/> are used to calculate PSDs for each component within each time window. The PSDs are then averaged over an hour, and the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) is computed using Eq. (2) from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.34"/>. We included all data in the analysis, without removing transients, as the aim of the study is to evaluate the sensitivity of HVSR to spatio-temporal variations in both noise sources and medium properties. As demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.35"/> through polarization analysis, the seismic wavefield in Glacier de la Plaine Morte behaves as in a 1D medium with no detected 2D or 3D resonances. Hence, Glacier de la Plaine Morte serves as an ideal location for evaluating the potential of the HVSR method.</p>
      <p id="d2e585">To characterize the ambient seismic wavefield contributing to the HVSR curves, we employ matched-field processing (MFP; Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>) on the Glacier de la Plaine Morte array. The MFP back azimuth within the 3–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range is selected for presentation in the subsequent sections. This frequency range is chosen because it encompasses frequencies where surface waves become sensitive to deeper velocity structures, making it suitable for probing the basal interface at a depth of approximately 130–160 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.36"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>HVSR curves for the pre-drainage period</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Resonance frequencies and ice thickness</title>
      <p id="d2e623">Between mid-May (day 120) and the end of August (day 237), the HVSR curves generally maintain a uniform shape. However, during brief episodes of hydraulic tremors, such as on days 151–154, the HVSR curves are disrupted, preventing the formation of any resonance peaks. For this period, all hourly curves within this period are stacked and represented as a probability density function (PDF). From approximately 3100 curves per site, we compute the median HVSR curves (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a–f). The stacked HVSR curves at each of the six borehole sites exhibit comparable characteristics: the fundamental resonance frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is around 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability between the stations), and the corresponding HVSR amplitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is around 1.4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). During the pre-drainage period, HVSR amplitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) vary by approximately 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (within the 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> probability) and show a similar pattern to the power spectral variations (about 8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), which are attributed to anthropogenic noise with characteristic diurnal and weekly patterns. This argues against meltwater or weather conditions being the primary control on noise variations (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e731"><bold>(a–f)</bold> Probability density functions from the hourly HVSR curves stacked for days 120–237 (pre-drainage period, in grey box) for the stations PM01–PM05 and for days 212–237 for PM06. The green line depicts the median curve and the blue circle the resonance frequency. <bold>(g–l)</bold> Same as <bold>(a–f)</bold> but for drainage days 245–246 in the blue box. The dashed blue circles highlight the trough in PM01 and PM02.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e751">HVSR fundamental resonance frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and peak amplitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the pre-drainage period, derived from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. The ice thickness measured by ground-penetrating radar (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-GPR) comes from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.37"/>, and the thickness, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is computed according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-GPR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">168</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">156</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">162</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">129</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">127</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">129</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">142</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">158</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">145</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">140</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">160</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1144">Next, we can assume that a frequency of the HVSR peak is close to the predominant resonance frequency of body waves (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="altparen.38"/>); then based on the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, S-wave velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>),  we can estimate the thickness of the glacier below the stations using  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.39"/>

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M60" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1210">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of ice we use the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1800</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.40"/>, yielding a range of thickness estimations for the ice. Helicopter-borne ground-penetrating radar (GPR) measured the ice thickness of Glacier de la Plaine Morte <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.41"/>. Spatial extrapolation of the ice thickness and uncertainties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.42"/> is used for comparison with the thickness obtained with Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>)  (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). The highest resonance frequencies correspond to the two shallowest GPR estimates. Both GPR and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-inferred thicknesses for all six stations fall within the associated uncertainties. Variations in thickness among stations within the array likely correspond to local ice thickness variations and glacier thinning towards the east.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Dominant noise sources</title>
      <p id="d2e1286">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> depicts the temporal variations in HVSR curves from station PM02 for 97 consecutive days. Generally, HVSR curves up to day 237 demonstrate a stable resonance frequency over time. Exceptions occur during periods of high tremor amplitudes, where nearby noise sources contaminate the HVSR curves (e.g., day 150 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). It is important to note that these tremor events, associated with hydrofracturing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.43"/>, can persist for hours to days, diminishing the significance of HVSR curves. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b, the back azimuth for every hour from day 140 to day 237 for the 2.5–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> band is presented. The relatively low maximum coherence of 0.4–0.5 suggests uncertainty in maximum coherence picks (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F11"/>a and b in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>). Nevertheless, two main noise source back azimuths are identifiable: from day 140 to 182, the dominant noise source exhibits a back azimuth of around 150°, attributed to anthropogenic noise from roads, industrial facilities, and cities like Sierre and Sion in the Rhône valley to the southeast. From day 182 onwards, the dominant noise source shifts northwestward, towards one of the proglacial waterfalls near the glacier terminus as the melt season progresses. Despite the variability in dominant noise sources, the HVSR curve remains stable during this period.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1313"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series of the hourly HVSR curves for days 140–237. The peak amplitudes (around 2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) exhibit a diurnal pattern (dashed green box) present on weekdays (solid green box). <bold>(b)</bold> Back azimuth per hour for days 140–237. The cluster around 150° (green box) has an anthropogenic source, and the cluster around 300° (blue box) reflects the proglacial waterfalls of the Trüebbach stream (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>HVSR curves and noise sources for the drainage period</title>
      <p id="d2e1346">From day 237 to 248, the seismic power (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) exhibits high variations related to the lake drainage. The HVSR time series from station PM02 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a) is compared against the back azimuth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b) of the dominant noise source and includes these phases related to drainage. <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1357"><italic>Pre-drainage tremor (days 237–240).</italic> The strong hydraulic tremor (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c) results in the disturbance of the HVSR over the entire frequency band of 0.5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.44"/> state, most glaciohydraulic tremors are generated by subglacial water flow, by ice quake bursts, or in moulins. The MFP back azimuth results point in the direction of the lake and drainage moulin (at approx. 180°).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1376"><italic>Onset of the lake drainage (day 240 at 16:00 LT).</italic> Nearby noise source (drainage moulin) interrupts the HVSR curve over the entire frequency band lasting for 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1390"><italic>Ongoing drainage and moulin resonance (days 241–244).</italic> Ongoing hydraulic tremors cause HVSR disturbances. Moulin resonances occur in the band of 1.5–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and generate multiple peaks in the HVSR. This is an example of the effect of a nearby source on the HVSR curves.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1404"><italic>HVSR trough (days 242–246).</italic> The HVSR curve exhibits a similar peak frequency compared to the pre-drainage phase. Remarkable is the trough that appears at around 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>g–l and this is visible in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a as the dark purple band) and is most pronounced in PM01 and PM02. This trough is also visible at days 242 and 243 during reduced tremor activity. During these periods of trough appearance, the dominant noise back azimuth points towards the proglacial waterfalls in the northwest, with a high signal coherence of up to 0.8. At the beginning of day 242, a trough at lower frequencies appears. However, the high-amplitude plateau spanning the fundamental resonance frequency indicates a disturbance of the HVSR, making the interpretation of this trough unreliable.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1422"><italic>Days 247–248</italic>. Strong tremor and seismic power disturb the HVSR over the entire frequency band. The dominant noise back azimuths of 180–200° point towards the area of the lake drainage.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e1429"><bold>(a)</bold> 2D time series of all the hourly HVSR curves for station PM02 for days 237–248. The numbers correspond to the numbered list in this section and indicate the different phases related to drainage. The dashed blue circles highlight the trough. <bold>(b)</bold> Back azimuth per hour for the dominant noise source. The green box depicts the cluster for the anthropogenic noise source, the dark blue for moulin,  and the light blue for the waterfall noise source.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1443">Based on these observations of the HVSR curve characteristics, we define the appearance of the trough as a primary temporal change most likely related to the glacier's seismic velocity structure. Other changes in HVSR curves coincide with variations in noise source locations and are thus difficult to interpret. In the next sections we present additional seismic analyses to argue that the trough is related to a change in medium properties rather than a varying dominant noise source.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Seismic interferometry</title>
      <p id="d2e1456">As additional means of characterizing subglacial changes, we employ seismic interferometry. We follow the standard approach to recover virtual seismic surface waves from station-pair cross-correlations of noise records <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.45"/> and apply it to the phenomenon of glacial lake drainage  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.46"/>. This may elucidate a varying fracture state and/or water saturation as seismic velocity changes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.47"/>. In temperate glacier applications, the measurement of small seismic velocity changes is challenging as meltwater-induced noise sources are typically non-stationary and the scattering of seismic waves is limited <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.48"/>. Here, we make use of the noise source around a back azimuth of 315°, which is stable for several consecutive days and which we identify as a proglacial waterfall (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b). As this source lies approximately on the axis connecting stations PM01 and PM03, it falls within their stationary-phase zone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.49"/>. The direct wave travelling between the two stations can thus be extracted by cross-correlating the recordings of the waterfall noise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.50"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e1482"><bold>(a)</bold> Bandpass-filtered (3.5–4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) daily cross-correlations between PM01 and PM03 for pre-drainage days 230–235 (blue) and drainage days 245–246 (orange). The solid vertical line indicates the estimated travel time for the direct wave, and the dashed vertical lines show the zoom window for <bold>(b)</bold>. <bold>(b)</bold> Zoom of <bold>(a)</bold>. <bold>(c)</bold> Velocity change relative to the pre-drainage period. The vertical bars indicate 1 standard deviation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation (see text for details).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1528">To this end, we calculate daily stacks of cross-correlations obtained from consecutive 900 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> windows of days 230–235 (pre-drainage) and 245–246 (drainage), as these days show a stable waterfall noise (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b). For day 246, we discard the last 3 h, since other noise sources become active during that time window. Prior to calculating the cross-correlations, the raw recordings are bandpass-filtered and subsequently clipped at 3 times the standard deviation as well as spectrally whitened.</p>
      <p id="d2e1542">The resulting cross-correlations reside in a narrow frequency band around 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and b). As expected, for all considered days, a clear direct wave propagating from PM01 to PM03 emerges, which carries maximum amplitudes near the estimated travel time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, obtained by dividing the inter-station distance by a Rayleigh wave velocity of 2800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>). Due to the short inter-station distance, this direct wave converges towards the auto-correlation but is slightly shifted to positive lag times, whereas the response at negative lag times is absent because of the one-sided illumination. However, individual phases exhibit a different travel time between pre- and post-drainage cross-correlations. This is visible by slightly shifted waveforms (Fig. 6b),  and we interpret this shift (or delay) as a change in seismic velocity.</p>
      <p id="d2e1581">We systematically investigate this observation by directly calculating travel time delays between the considered days and a reference cross-correlation formed by stacking the 6 pre-drainage days. For this purpose, we rely on the wavelet cross-spectrum technique <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.51"/>, which yields <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as a function of lag time and frequency. To obtain high-quality results, we keep only those <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values associated with a minimum cross-coherence of 0.95 and a minimum cross-spectrum amplitude of 0.9 of its maximum value in the frequency range of 3–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which focuses on the region near the estimated travel time. From the remaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, we determine the median and the standard deviation and transform these values to velocity changes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the relation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As we are considering the direct wave (and not scattered waves), we do not apply a linear regression to obtain velocity changes but instead rely on the statistical analysis as detailed above.</p>
      <p id="d2e1666">For the pre-drainage period, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values scatter around zero with a maximum deviation of 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the reference, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c. By contrast, results for the 2 drainage days show velocity drops between 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (albeit with a somewhat higher standard deviation compared to the pre-drainage days), indicative of a medium change. For a detailed depth investigation of the velocity drop, a frequency-dependent velocity change would be required, which cannot be obtained due to a less favourable source distribution at higher frequencies (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>). However, compared to a Rayleigh wave travelling within ice (velocity of around 1800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="altparen.52"/>), the significantly higher wave speed at above 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for which the interferometry results are representative, indicates that the extracted direct wave samples the glacier bed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Ice–bedrock velocity model</title>
      <p id="d2e1748">Next, we use Rayleigh wave ellipticity together with velocity dispersion curves to determine differences in the glacier's S-wave velocity structure between day of year 230 representing pre-drainage conditions and day of year 245 representing drainage conditions. Dispersion curves (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a) are obtained using high-resolution beamforming (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>) of the vertical component signals. The dispersion curve reveals a saddle and reduced phase velocities for frequencies below 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the drainage period. The uncertainties of the dispersion curve below 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the drainage period are lower than the velocities for the pre-drainage (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F13"/>); hence we believe these lower velocities are reliable. The ellipticity curves (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b) are computed using the RayDec tool developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.53"/>. RayDec extracts Rayleigh wave ellipticity from the ambient noise measurements based on the random decrement technique. The shape of the ellipticity curves is similar to the HVSR curves, but the absolute ellipticity values are smaller than the HVSR measurements, which may include additional signal content from other seismic waves such as Love and/or body waves. During the drainage the ellipticity curve exhibits a pronounced trough at about 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is a feature not present in the pre-drainage ellipticity data.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e1789"><bold>(a)</bold> Dispersion curves for the pre-drainage day (black) and the drainage day (blue); the dashed orange circle indicates the saddle in the drainage dispersion curve. <bold>(b)</bold> Ellipticity curves for the pre-drainage day (black) and the drainage day (blue); the dashed orange circle indicates the trough in the drainage ellipticity curve.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Inverse modelling</title>
      <p id="d2e1810">We perform joint ellipticity and dispersion inverse modelling in the probabilistic framework that includes uncertainties, and we supplement it with  subsequent forward modelling. We use the ellipticity and dispersion curves presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> and apply the inversion algorithm from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.54"/> that produces the complete posterior probability density function (posterior PDF) of velocity model parameters. The main advantages are the automatically optimized number of layers of the 1D velocity model and solution uncertainty. The main outputs of this inversion approach are posterior marginal PDFs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the P-wave velocities are only supplementary and constrained by an a priory range of the Poisson ratio. Nevertheless, the Poisson ratio is only indicative due to low sensitivity in inversion with limited dispersion curves.  These inversion runs include additional site-specific constraints, like the depth of the bedrock (max 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), range of seismic velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–3500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 800–7000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), densities (917 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the range of the Poisson ratio (0.2–0.49; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="altparen.55"/>). The misfit is quantified using the variance reduction (VR; Eq. 8 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="altparen.56"/>) between synthetic and observed dispersion and ellipticity curves, weighted by reciprocal errors (see error bars in Fig. 8). The VR value of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> means a perfect fit, a VR value of 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> means fit on the edge of the data error bars, and negative values mean that synthetic predictions are out of the range of observed data errors. The VR captures the fitting of the synthetic predictions for the entire frequency range of the data used as input for the inversion.</p>
      <p id="d2e1934">We first perform the inversion using the dispersion and ellipticity curves from day 230 (pre-drainage period). In this case, the synthetic curves fit the measured data well (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c and d). Posterior marginal PDFs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a) are sharp in the uppermost 130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. the zone of precisely inferred model parameters). In the upper 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> there is a continuous velocity gradient without any distinctive strong interface that can be interpreted as the near-surface ice layer subject to weathering and fractures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.57"/>. From 20–130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth there is a continuous layer of ice with expected S-wave velocities of around 1800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Between a depth of 130–160 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, there is an interface representing the ice–bed transition. The resolution in the probability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is low, as the network is too small to provide dispersion measurements for frequencies sensitive to depths within the bedrock (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, grey area). The Poisson ratio range is limited to 0.4 to adhere to the ice properties. This inversion run comprises a larger frequency band for the ellipticity curve compared to the following runs in order to include the shallower part in the velocity model.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e2029">Inversion results for <bold>(a)</bold> the pre-drainage period (day 230) a shear-wave velocity profile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> approximate value of Poisson ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> measured dispersion curve and uncertainty (black line) and modelled dispersion (grey lines), and <bold>(d)</bold> measured ellipticity curve and uncertainty (black line) and modelled ellipticity (grey lines).  <bold>(e–h)</bold> Inversion results for the drainage (day 245) that did not include a low-velocity layer. <bold>(i–l)</bold> Inversion results for the drainage including a low-velocity layer in the inversion. The blue circle depicts the possible low-velocity layer. The inversion results behind the grey shaded region below 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<bold>a</bold>, <bold>b</bold>, <bold>e</bold>, <bold>f</bold>, <bold>i</bold>, and <bold>j</bold>) are poorly constrained as a result of lacking dispersion measurements below 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2111">For day 245 (during the drainage period), two inversions are performed using the same dispersion and ellipticity curves (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, blue curves). The ellipticity curves are truncated at 5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to focus the model fit on the low-frequency range. The first inversion (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>e and f) has the constraint that no low-velocity layer is allowed in the velocity model. This PDF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile is similar to the day 230 profile with an ice–bedrock interface between 130–160 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, this inversion run cannot find a velocity model that explains the observed phase velocity dispersion between 4 and 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>g); the fitted velocities are too high. The fit of the ellipticity curve has discrepancies for the trough at 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as only a weak trough could be produced (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>h). For this inversion test without low-velocity zones, the maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori models have fits of VR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. This inversion run without a low-velocity layer uses the dispersion and ellipticity curves from the drainage period as input data. These curves contain a saddle and a trough (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). In this case, the synthetic curves attempt to replicate the input curves while identifying the optimal velocity model. By intentionally prohibiting a low-velocity layer in this inversion, we aim to demonstrate that this option does not fit the data as well as the following inversion run.</p>
      <p id="d2e2199">The second inversion run with the dispersion and ellipticity curves of day 245 allows for a low-velocity layer at the ice–bedrock interface. The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>i) shows a shift to lower S-wave velocities at approximately 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is missing in the pre-drainage profile. In particular, in the PDF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile, the upper structure up to 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> displays a correct S-wave velocity of ice (approximately 1800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Between 120–150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth, a cluster of probable low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 750–1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appears (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>i, blue circle). At the same depth interval, the Poisson ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) increases to the value of liquid water (0.49) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>j, blue circle). For this run, the fit for the ellipticity and the trough is satisfactory, but the dispersion curve fit fails to reproduce the saddle point in the lower frequencies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>k and l). For this inversion test allowing low-velocity zones, the maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori models have fits of VR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Forward modelling</title>
      <p id="d2e2349">Due to the minor differences in model fitting during the inversion runs for the drainage and the low probability of the low-velocity layer, we further explore dispersion and ellipticity using a forward modelling approach. The forward modelling is constrained by the S-wave velocity, depth, and thickness of the low-velocity layer as inferred from the inversion model. For the forward modelling of the ellipticity and dispersion curves, we use the Geopsy software package with the modules “gpell” and “gpdc” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.58"/>. This software computes dispersion and ellipticity curves for the fundamental mode of Rayleigh waves in a user-defined layered medium.</p>
      <p id="d2e2355">The forward model for the pre-drainage scenario consists of a single ice layer over a half-space model,  and the drainage scenario consists of two-layer ice over a half-space model, with a low-velocity layer inserted between the ice and bedrock. The low-velocity-layer thickness ranges from 10 to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the S-wave velocities vary between 750 and 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as derived from the inversion (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>i). P-wave velocities are held constant. We compare the model output to the measured dispersion and ellipticity curves (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). The pre-drainage modelled ellipticity produces a mild trough around 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The subsurface models that include a low-velocity layer accurately reproduce the sharp trough around 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ellipticity curve, with increased thickness of the low-velocity layer shifting the trough to lower frequencies. However, the model's fit to the measured dispersion curve is less satisfactory, particularly with a notable misfit at lower frequencies and around the saddle feature. Based on the forward model results, the low-velocity zone is probably a 10–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick layer with an S-wave velocity of around 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Preferred subsurface model</title>
      <p id="d2e2437">Our inverse and forward modelling tests suggest that a low-velocity zone in the basal part of the ice is the most plausible explanation for the observed saddle in the dispersion curve and the ellipticity trough in the seismic data. Notably, the sharp ellipticity trough around 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, evident in the low-velocity-layer model but absent in the pre-drainage model, strongly supports the low-velocity-layer scenario as the preferred interpretation for the drainage process. The forward modelling provides a valuable complement to the weak inversion results, helping to further constrain the properties of the low-velocity layer. The low-velocity zone is probably a 10–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick layer with an S-wave velocity of around 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence, there is a drop of around 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in S-wave velocity compared to the initial values of 1800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2498">Revealing the basal low-velocity zone through the inversion process remains challenging. The limited low-frequency data in the dispersion curve, resulting from the current array set-up, restrict the inversion capabilities. Consequently, the probability of the low-velocity layer carries significant uncertainty (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>i). Although the model including the low-velocity layer (VR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) demonstrates a qualitatively better fit than the model without it (VR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we cannot determine the statistical significance of the VR values. The inversion results suggest that the synthetic dispersion and ellipticity curves fit the input data better when a low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer is included, and a 1D structure without a low-velocity layer is a poor approximation of the seismic velocity model. The low-velocity layer, particularly highlighted by forward modelling, helps to explain the observed trough in the ellipticity curve, although the saddle in the dispersion curve was not accurately captured.</p>
      <p id="d2e2575">The misfit between the inverse and forward-modelled dispersion curves may come from limitations in fully capturing the complex wavefield in the models. For instance, basal features can act as waveguides, potentially influenced by a hypothetical water-saturated layer. An alternative explanation for the seismic velocity drop involves a sediment layer between the ice and bedrock that becomes water pressurized, a phenomenon identified in Antarctica <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.59"/>. The area around Glacier de la Plaine Morte exposed by rapid glacier retreat during recent years  almost exclusively consists of a layer of poorly consolidated sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.60"/>. A more complex model with for example pressurized sediments or non-uniform ice velocities might improve the fit for the lower frequencies of the dispersion curves. In our study, we refrained from modelling the presence of a thin sediment layer due to insufficient additional information on the thickness and properties of the sediment or ice. The inferred thickness of the low-velocity layer exceeds possible sedimentary layer dimensions. Instead, we suggest that water is temporarily stored in voids and fractures at the base of the ice.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e2587"><bold>(a)</bold> Measured and modelled dispersion curves for the pre-drainage period (dotted black and green lines), measured dispersion curve (dashed grey line) with uncertainty (shaded grey area) with the modelled dispersion curves (red and blue lines) for several thickness (10–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and velocity values (750–1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer. <bold>(b)</bold> Same as for <bold>(a)</bold> but for the measured and modelled ellipticity curves.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e2649">Based on the observations from the seismic analyses for the pre-drainage and drainage periods, water is stored in fractures and other void spaces near the base of the ice and results in a reduction in the seismic velocity. In the next sections we discuss how such a transient seismic velocity decrease can be explained in relation to changes in the subglacial environment, building upon insights from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.61"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <label>6.1</label><title>HVSR trough related to medium changes</title>
      <p id="d2e2662">In our study, we inferred that the HVSR trough adjacent to the fundamental resonance peak (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>g and h) reflects a change in subglacial seismic properties. Equivalent to our findings, in earthquake site-response studies, a trough in the HVSR is related to low-velocity layers at depth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.62"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.63"/> discuss the presence of trapped surface waves in the low-velocity layer. This resonance influences the vertical component of motion and de-amplification of the horizontal components.  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.64"/> observed that VHSR peaks (the inverse of HVSR troughs) offer insights into seismic energy anomalies caused by fluids in reservoirs, as the wavefield predominantly exhibits polarization in the vertical direction. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.65"/> conducted a study using VHSR measurements on Tête Rousse Glacier in France. They identified subglacial water-filled cavities through the presence of VHSR peaks, a result of diminished basal impedance associated with higher water content.</p>
      <p id="d2e2679">At Glacier de la Plaine Morte, the trough implies a vertical amplification at around 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The resonance mode analysis (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>) validates the existence of a vertical resonance around 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for PM01 and PM02 occurring concurrently with the development of the HVSR trough at these same stations. This implies that the low-velocity layer is spatially constrained or at least spatially varying. Additional evidence for velocity inversions at depth is in a plateau of the dispersion curve, as observed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.66"/>. The HVSR trough appears to form as early as day 229 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a); this may suggest that meltwater, or some early leakage from the lake, begins to reach the subglacial environment. However, the early trough is less clear like after the lake drainage event at days 245 and 246.</p>
      <p id="d2e2708">The above results are in line with the velocity decrease in the drainage period observed with seismic interferometry. Similar to the HVSR approach, we focused on days with a stable dominant noise source which lies in the  stationary-phase zone of the analysed station pair. In this situation, a slight back azimuth change in the source (10°), which is not evident in the beamforming results, is unable to produce the observed velocity drop of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a reference, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.67"/> performed noise interferometry across Bering Glacier and revealed a  1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seismic velocity reduction. The low-velocity layer can be explained by water storage in basal hydrofractures caused by the drainage, which is expected to drop the seismic velocity of Rayleigh waves. However, the velocity change obtained with interferometry is a bulk measurement representing  the entire ice column. Therefore we cannot make quantitative statements on the velocity drop near the base.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <label>6.2</label><title>The subglacial environment</title>
      <p id="d2e2754">Glacier de la Plaine Morte is a fully temperate glacier and thus similar to Alpine glaciers previously studied with passive seismology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.68"/>. For Glacier de la Plaine Morte, variations in hydraulic conditions may be the result of varying macroscopic water inclusions, specifically by varying volumes of basal crevasses, void spaces, or the filling state thereof. The occurrence of basal fracture and void spaces contributes to a decrease in bulk velocity, consequently resulting in a reduction in shear-wave velocity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.69"/>. Cracks at the surface of Glacier de la Plaine Morte can lower the Rayleigh wave velocity by up to 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.70"/>. Further observations of anisotropy in glacial ice caused by crystal fabric orientation result in a  3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  decrease in shear-wave velocity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.71"/>. At Rhône Glacier, another temperate Swiss glacier, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.72"/> found diurnal variations in shear-wave anisotropy of up to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which they explain by the presence of macroscopic meltwater inclusions. The findings presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.73"/> reveal that the subglacial hydraulic system may extend up to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the overlying ice mass, with hydraulically connected crevasses occupying 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To provide a comparison, all fractures (both connected and unconnected) make up 0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of Worthington Glacier, Alaska <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.74"/>, while all voids, channels, and cracks combined account for 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of Storglaciären, Sweden <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.75"/>. These numbers for void space and seismic velocity are derived from scenarios involving meltwater-filled fractures. Based on our inverted velocity profiles (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>), a shear-wave velocity decrease of 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is estimated. In the case of Glacier de la Plaine Morte, the occurrence of multi-day pre-drainage hydraulic tremors suggests the establishment of an extensive fracture network <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.76"/>. Consequently, the quantity of water-filled fractures is likely significantly higher than the numbers presented above, as well as the seismic velocity drop. At Gornergletscher in Switzerland, a similar ice-marginal lake used to drain annually, releasing a water volume comparable to that of Lac des Faverges <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.77"/>. Here, the water was stored subglacial and a void ratio ranging from 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>6.2.1</label><title>Hydraulic parameters</title>
      <p id="d2e2887">We produced seismic-based evidence for water storage near the base of the ice,  and in this section we show where this water originated. For this, we present a comparison of the discharge rate of Lac des Faverges and the stage of the Trüebbach stream (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d and e). We include the daily melt-induced discharge of the entire glacier. The daily melt–discharge curve is offset by 3 d from the Trüebbach stage. To align stage fluctuations for stage–discharge calculations, the melt curve is shifted 3 d forward. Additionally, the Trüebbach stage peak, delayed by 3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the lake discharge peak (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e), represents the expected travel time for the subareal part of the draining water between the Rezligletscher tongue and the gauge station. Consequently, the lake discharge curve is shifted 3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> forward for comparison. The total glacier discharge is then computed by summing the lake discharge and surface melt.</p>
      <p id="d2e2910">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> presents the comparison between the Trüebbach stage and the total discharge. The red curves represent the stage–discharge relation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.78"/> and 95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> confidence bounds for the pre-drainage period. Here, the stage increases with the discharge. Most meltwater drains northward along the subglacial interface towards the Trüebbach stream. However, a notable portion of surface melt infiltrates the karstic system connected to the Rhône Valley via subsurface conduits mainly in the southwestern part of the glacier <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.79"/>. This results in a low stage–discharge correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). With the onset of the drainage, the discharge rapidly increases initially, followed by an increase in stage. This trend follows the slope of the extrapolated fitting curve of the pre-drainage period (dashed red curve in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>). However, we acknowledge that the data are below the fit. After the main discharge peak, the orange (from day 241) to black (end of day 245) data points form a cluster where the discharge remains high, while the stage does not surpass the highest values of the pre-drainage stage levels. Over about 3 d, the discharge more than doubles with respect to pre-drainage conditions, whereas the fit of the stage–discharge relation shows no trend in stage. This suggests a significant temporal water storage. As discussed previously, we suggest the drainage water is mainly stored in fractures and voids in the basal part of the ice. However, during and after the temporal storage, some of the water might infiltrate into the karstic system, where also parts of the meltwater are flowing through <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.80"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e2952">Total discharge from the lake and meltwater plotted against the stage of the Trüebbach. The white data points represent the days before the start of the drainage, the colour-coded data points follow the days from the onset of the drainage until day 246. The dashed red line is the linear fitting function (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the 95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> confidence bounds (solid thin red lines), fitted for the pre-drainage data points. The drainage data points (except the main drainage peak (yellow dots) are fitted in blue.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>6.2.2</label><title>Water storage extent</title>
      <p id="d2e2992">To obtain an estimation of the aerial extent of the stored water, we assume a low-velocity layer 10–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>), and a void space of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The elevated presence of water-filled fractures implies that the fracture and void volume is likely to be on the high side of the void space numbers provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.81"/>. For the discharge volume estimation, the peak discharge volume (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e) is excluded, since this water drained directly in the Trüebbach stream. Short glacier surface uplift (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="altparen.82"/>; Fig. 2b) implies subglacial water flow for this period. From the lake volume curve, we compute that approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water drained from midday 241 up to the end of day 245 into the subglacial environment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d). The total volume of ice filled with water is obtained by dividing the drained water volume by the void space percentage. Given the low-velocity-layer thickness, we can then determine the areal extent of the water-filled void spaces. This results in 0.33–2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of fractures and voids filled with water. For comparison, the seismic array covers an area of 0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the entire glacier is 7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2016.</p>
      <p id="d2e3088">Given the assumption that nearly all the water following the primary drainage peak was temporarily stored in basal fractures and voids, the impact on the entire glacier area is estimated to range from 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This value is subject to significant variability due to uncertainties in fracture volume,  and this estimate serves as an upper limit, as the entire <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of water may not be stored simultaneously. The troughs in the HVSRs are primarily observed at stations PM01 and PM02 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) in the western segment of the array. As depicted in Fig. 9 by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.83"/>, a channelized subglacial drainage system emerges to the south and west of the seismic array and supports the observations that the low-velocity layer has only a local extent.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3">
  <label>6.3</label><title>Implications for HVSR measurement on ice</title>
      <p id="d2e3144">The HVSR time-series observations on Glacier de la Plaine Morte confirm the general recommendations and known issues of the stability of the HVSR method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.84"/>, especially with regards to the impact of varying noise sources. Nevertheless, based on the temporal evolution of the HVSR curves, we are able to identify a medium change at the base of the glacier. Hence, we outline a series of considerations for applying HVSR to a glacier:</p>
      <p id="d2e3150"><list list-type="order">
            <list-item>

      <p id="d2e3155">The HVSR technique is valued for its simplicity as a single-station approach, and computing HVSR curves is straightforward. For ice thickness estimations relying on resonance frequency, a single-station measurement can be adequate, following the approach outlined in points 2 and 3.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>

      <p id="d2e3161">Power spectra over the full recording period, covering a wide frequency range, can be used to identify events like glaciohydraulic tremors, water flow, or moulin resonances. With this transient events in the glacier, the HVSR curves exhibit hourly variations that could introduce bias in thickness or velocity estimations. In scenarios with a nearby seismic noise source, the overall HVSR amplitude tends to rise, accompanied by the appearance of broad HVSR amplitude peaks. In cases of a high event rate, a multiple-day to weeks-long recording period is recommended.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>

      <p id="d2e3167">When the seismic record length is adequate, hourly-computed HVSR curves can be stacked and presented as probability density functions (refer to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) to achieve a stable estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additionally, one can present the HVSR as time series to examine the variations in curve characteristics over time.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>

      <p id="d2e3186">A comprehensive understanding of spatio-temporal variations and medium changes on such a dynamic subsurface requires an array of multiple seismic stations. An array facilitates additional passive seismic analyses, including beamforming, seismic interferometry, resonance mode analysis, and phase velocity dispersion, thereby providing valuable insights for site characterization.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>

      <p id="d2e3192">With an array available, a beamforming analysis allows for acquiring noise source location and phase velocities. The analysis should cover multiple frequency bins, including the one targeting the basal interface. Precise noise source localization is pivotal for distinguishing whether variations in HVSR curves result from a source effect or alterations in the medium. (Sub-)glacial processes might produce seismic waves with a frequency content that could resemble <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
            </list-item>
          </list></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e3217">In this study, we analysed 4 months of continuous seismic records on Glacier de la Plaine Morte with the HVSR technique to capture spatio-temporal variations at the basal interface. We aim to assess the reliability of the technique in such a dynamic environment. Subglacial processes change the medium properties for propagating seismic waves, but simultaneously, the source of the seismic ambient noise field varies. HVSR changes primarily originate from fluctuations in nearby noise conditions influenced by hydraulic tremors, drainage-related events, moulin resonances, and  anthropogenic sources. Despite these source-related influences, a discernible spatio-temporal trend in HVSR curves reflects material changes within and/or beneath the ice. An HVSR trough emerges after the subglacial drainage of Lac des Faverges, an ice-marginal lake. Seismic velocity changes of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inferred from interferometry indicate a velocity drop at the ice–bedrock interface. Inversion and forward modelling of Rayleigh wave ellipticity and dispersion curves further refine the dimensions of this low-velocity zone. A low-velocity-layer thickness of 10–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is estimated and a seismic velocity drop of up to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on the seismic analysis and discharge anomalies appearing after the drainage, we suggest that the basal low-velocity layer can be explained by subglacial water storage in newly formed fractures after drainage. This layer has a local extent, reflected in the spatial variations in the HVSR trough throughout the array, and covers an estimated 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the glacier area. Our results thus demonstrate that the HVSR technique can be used as an indicator of a spatio-temporal medium change at the ice–bedrock interface.</p>
      <p id="d2e3269">We suggest that a deeper understanding of the seismic noise field and the response of HVSR to a dynamic and changing subsurface is needed to make a reliable characterization of the medium using the HVSR seismic method on a glacier. In addition, stacking or filtering multiple days- to weeks-long time series of hourly HVSR data is necessary to smooth transient events and changes in noise sources, ensuring a reliable fundamental resonance frequency. Relying solely on a few hours of measurements could result in a significantly biased HVSR curve. The single-station HVSR methodology has demonstrated its potential on glaciers. The next logical step could involve its application in remote and less noisy regions, such as the Antarctic or Arctic ice sheets. Subsequently, a study focusing on temporal variations in the  HVSR over multiple seasons could be pursued.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>MFP and dispersion curves</title>
      <p id="d2e3283">Matched-field processing (MFP) is an array-processing technique that is based on phase delay measurements. Complementary to the traditional plane wave beamforming, MFP has the advantage that it can also include non-planar waves from nearby noise sources. MFP identifies the location of a source by a cross-correlation of the observed data with replicas of expected signals computed for various trial source positions. Maximum correlation corresponds to the most likely source location. For further methodology details we refer to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.85"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.86"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.87"/> used the MFP technique to obtain the source locations of the hydraulic tremor at frequencies around 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this study, we used the planar wave assumption to perform a grid search over back azimuth and phase velocity from the ambient vibrations,  and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F11"/> displays a few examples of the maximum coherence locations. The back azimuths of the dominant noise source are computed for every hour. For the 4-month recording period, back azimuths are computed in three frequency bands: 3–5, 5–8, and 8–12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F12"/>). The minimum frequency regarding the array resolution is 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.88"/>. We found that for this array configuration, a minimum bandwidth of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is required to obtain a stable MFP result.</p>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F11"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d2e3339"><bold>(a–d)</bold> MFP back azimuth and phase velocity for 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of data for respectively days 163, 231, 240, and 246 for the frequency band 2.5–5 Hz. The blue cross identifies the maximum coherence.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e3360">Dispersion curves as presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> are obtained using  high-resolution beamforming, the methodology developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.89"/> applying the Capon algorithm. The picked mean dispersion curves of probability density functions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F13"/>) are smoothed, resulting in the dispersion curves of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a. We focus on the fundamental Rayleigh wave mode, which dominates the wavefield.</p><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F12"><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d2e3376">MFP back azimuth for days 230–248 computed for frequency bands <bold>(a)</bold> 5–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> 8–12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F13"><label>Figure A3</label><caption><p id="d2e3411">Probability density distribution for the dispersion curves obtained by high-resolution beamforming <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.90"/>. The dashed lines are the array resolution limits, the black line comprises the mean curve,  and the grey lines are the uncertainties for the dispersion curve of pre-drainage day 230 <bold>(a)</bold> and drainage day 245 <bold>(b)</bold>. The steeply inclined stripes at higher frequencies are aliasing effects.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f13.png"/>

      </fig>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>HVSR profile and meteorological parameters</title>
      <p id="d2e3441">Meteorological data are provided by MeteoSwiss weather stations at Montana (1495 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the glacier) and at Adelboden (1320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We use continuous measurements with a 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sampling rate of air temperature, wind speed, solar radiation,  and precipitation. The HVSR is juxtaposed with meteorological parameters to explore potential correlations, particularly investigating whether the external cause of the diurnal peak amplitude pattern can be identified (refer to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F14"/>). While temperature exhibits a diurnal trend, the intensity of peak amplitude shows no direct correlation with the fluctuations in peak temperature. Additionally, precipitation, wind, and solar radiation do not exert any discernible influence on the HVSR curves.</p>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F14"><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d2e3515">HVSR time series of station PM02 for days 120–170 and the meteorological parameters for the nearest weather station ABO (source MeteoSwiss). <bold>(a)</bold> Precipitation, <bold>(b)</bold> temperature, <bold>(c)</bold> wind, and <bold>(d)</bold> solar radiation.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f14.jpg"/>

      </fig>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <label>Appendix C</label><title>Resonance mode analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e3548">We employ normal mode analysis of ambient vibrations to retrieve physical parameters that characterize a structure and to monitor the structure over time. In this analysis we use the frequency domain decomposition (FDD) technique by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.91"/>, applied to rock slopes including higher vibration modes (see Sect. 3 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="altparen.92"/>). The FDD output consists of singular values (SVs) and corresponding singular vectors from the singular-value decomposition of the cross-power spectral densities of all seismic input traces. The SVs can be understood as the auto-spectral densities of the modal coordinates, which peak at fundamental and higher-mode resonance frequencies of the structure. The corresponding singular vectors are interpreted as the 3D mode shapes of the structure. The FDD technique is sensitive to varying noise sources, as it assumes uniformly distributed sources with a near-white source spectrum.</p>
      <p id="d2e3557">In this study we performed the mode analysis for 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the three-component seismic data applied on 4 d: the pre-drainage (day 231), drainage event (day 240), moulin resonances (day 242), and the day with the trough in the HVSR (day 245). The noisy bandwidths are included for days 240 and 242,  and this nearby moulin noise source disturbs the signal significantly with the result that resonance modes are not identifiable (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.F15"/>b and c). Days 231 and 245 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.F15"/>a and d) have the same dominant noise source (one of the proglacial waterfalls; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b); hence we can make a comparison of the pre-and drainage mode analysis. Day 231 displays a fundamental mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at approx. 3 Hz and a weak second mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at approx. 4.4 Hz. At day 245, we observe a similar fundamental resonance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  but the second mode (4.4 Hz) is much more pronounced than at day 231. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the vertical singular vector is dominating, while for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the horizontal singular vectors are strongest.</p>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S3.F15"><label>Figure C1</label><caption><p id="d2e3632">Singular values with picked resonance frequencies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the <bold>(a)</bold> pre-drainage, <bold>(b)</bold> drainage onset, <bold>(c)</bold> moulin resonance, and <bold>(d)</bold> drainage period.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1469/2025/tc-19-1469-2025-f15.png"/>
        

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e3679">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.T2"/> displays the singular vector values. In the resonance mode analysis, particular attention is given to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component (associated with drainage, found in the last column) for PM01 and PM02. Notably, these values are significantly higher than the corresponding horizontal vectors. This distinction between the components is more pronounced here compared to the other stations and the pre-drainage period.</p>

<table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S3.T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table C1</label><caption><p id="d2e3701">Singular vector values for the pre-drainage and drainage resonance mode analysis. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fundamental resonance mode; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the second mode; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the mode shape vector of the three components. Since the stations are not geographically oriented, we cannot put coordinates to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vectors and should be considered relative values. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mode shape of the vertical component.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pre-drainage</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Drainage</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.54</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.83</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>


</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e4305">The seismic data used for this research are available in the data portal of the Swiss Seismological Service <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.93"/> at ETH Zurich (<uri>http://networks.seismo.ethz.ch/networks/4d/</uri>, last access: April 2023) <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12686/SED/NETWORKS/4D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.12686/SED/NETWORKS/4D</ext-link>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e4320">JvG initiated the research idea, performed the HVSR analysis, performed the inversion and forward modelling, and wrote the manuscript. FW advised on this project and wrote the manuscript. FL performed the seismic interferometry and wrote the manuscript. MiH advised on the inverse and forward modelling and wrote the manuscript. MaH provided lake and melt–discharge data, advised on the glaciology of Glacier de la Plaine Morte,  and edited the manuscript. DF advised on the HVSR analysis and edited the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e4327">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e4333">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e4339">The authors thank their home institutions and all people involved in the monitoring systems used in this research. Special thanks go to Mauro Häusler for his contributions to the resonance mode analysis. We acknowledge Malgorzata Chmiel for advising on the MFP analysis and the discussions on the scope of the research. Geopraevent Ltd. (<uri>https://www.geopraevent.ch/</uri>, last access: January 2023) and Lenk municipality (<uri>https://lenk-simmental.ch</uri>, last access: January 2023) provided the Trüebbach stage and Lac des Faverges time-lapse images. The author acknowledges that ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT-3; <uri>http://openai.com</uri>, last access: December 2024) was used for partially improving the English in an earlier version of this paper. The suggestions and feedback of the editor, Kristin Poinar, and of the two reviewers (Andreas Köhler and Florent Gimbert) are valued and highly improved the manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e4353">Janneke van Ginkel is funded with an ETH Zürich Postdoctoral Fellowship. Fabian Lindner received support through the German Research Foundation (grant no. LI3721/2-1). Miroslav Hallo is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellowship P23070 and Grant-in-Aid 23KF0149.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e4359">This paper was edited by Kristin Poinar and reviewed by Andreas Köhler and Florent Gimbert.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Albarello and Lunedei(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Albarello, D. and Lunedei, E.: Combining horizontal ambient vibration components for H/V spectral ratio estimates, Geophys. J. Int., 194, 936–951, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt130" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggt130</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Antunes et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Antunes, V., Planes, T., Obermann, A., Panzera, F., D'Amico, S., Mazzini, A., Sciarra, A., Ricci, T., and Lupi, M.: Insights into the dynamics of the Nirano Mud Volcano through seismic characterization of drumbeat signals and V/H analysis, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 431, 107619, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107619</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Aster and Winberry(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Aster, R. C. and Winberry, J. P.: Glacial seismology, Rep. Prog. Phys., 80, 126801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa8473" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1361-6633/aa8473</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bard(1999)</label><mixed-citation> Bard, P.-Y.: Microtremor measurements: a tool for site effect estimation, in: Proceedings the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, 3, 1251–1279, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bartholomaus et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Bartholomaus, T. C., Amundson, J. M., Walter, J. I., O'Neel, S., West, M. E., and Larsen, C. F.: Subglacial discharge at tidewater glaciers revealed by seismic tremor, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 6391–6398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064590" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL064590</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Behm et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Behm, M., Walter, J. I., Binder, D., Cheng, F., Citterio, M., Kulessa, B., Langley, K., Limpach, P., Mertl, S., Schöner, W., Tamstorf, M., and Weyss, G.: Seismic characterization of a rapidly-rising jökulhlaup cycle at the AP Olsen Ice Cap, NE-Greenland, J. Glaciol., 66, 329–347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2020.9</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bensen et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Bensen, G. D., Ritzwoller, M. H., Barmin, M. P., Levshin, A. L., Lin, F., Moschetti, M. P., Shapiro, N. M., and Yang, Y.: Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 1239–1260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Biot(1962)</label><mixed-citation> Biot, M. A.: Mechanics of Deformation and Acoustic Propagation in Porous Media, J. Appl. Phys., 33, 1482–1498, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bonilla et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Bonilla, L. F., Steidl, J. H., Lindley, G. T., Tumarkin, A. G., and Archuleta, R. J.: Site amplification in the San Fernando Valley, California: variability of site-effect estimation using the S wave, coda, and H/V methods, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 710–730, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0870030710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/BSSA0870030710</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bonnefoy-Claudet et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., Cotton, F., and Bard, P.-Y.: The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies: a literature review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 79, 205–227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.07.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.07.004</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Brenguier et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Brenguier, F., Boué, P., Ben-Zion, Y., Vernon, F., Johnson, C., Mordret, A., Coutant, O., Share, P.-E., Beaucé, E., Hollis, D., and Lecocq, T.: Train traffic as a powerful noise source for monitoring active faults with seismic interferometry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 9529–9536, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083438" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL083438</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Brenguier et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Brenguier, F., Courbis, R., Mordret, A., Campman, X., Boué, P., Chmiel, M., Takano, T., Lecocq, T., Van der Veen, W., Postif, S., and Hollis, D.: Noise-based ballistic wave passive seismic monitoring. Part 1: body waves, Geophys. J. Int., 221, 683–691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz440" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggz440</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Brincker et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Brincker, R., Zhang, L., and Andersen, P.: Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition, Smart Mater. Struct., 10, 441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chaput et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Chaput, J., Aster, R., Karplus, M., and Nakata, N.: Ambient high-frequency seismic surface waves in the firn column of central west Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 68, 785–798, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2021.135</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Chatelain et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Chatelain, J. L., Guillier, B., Cara, F., Duval, A. M., Atakan, K., Bard, P. Y., and Wp02 Sesame Team: Evaluation of the influence of experimental conditions on H/V results from ambient noise recordings, B. Earthq. Eng., 6, 33–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9040-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10518-007-9040-7</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Chieppa et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Chieppa, D., Hobiger, M., Bergamo, P., and Fäh, D.: Ambient vibration analysis on large scale arrays when lateral variations occur in the subsurface: a study case in Switzerland, Pure Appl. Geophys., 177, 4247–4269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02516-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00024-020-02516-x</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Chmiel et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Chmiel, M., Roux, P., and Bardainne, T.: Extraction of phase and group velocities from ambient surface noise in a patch-array configuration, Geophysics, 81, KS231–KS240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0027.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/geo2016-0027.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Cook et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Cook, J. M., Hodson, A. J., and Irvine-Fynn, T. D.: Supraglacial weathering crust dynamics inferred from cryoconite hole hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 30, 433–446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10602" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.10602</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Corciulo et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Corciulo, M., Roux, P., Campillo, M., Dubucq, D., and Kuperman, W. A.: Multiscale matched-field processing for noise-source localization in exploration geophysics, Geophysics, 77, KS33–KS41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0438.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/geo2011-0438.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Di Giacomo et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Di Giacomo, D., Gallipoli, M. R., Mucciarelli, M., Parolai, S., and Richwalski, S. M.: Analysis and modeling of HVSR in the presence of a velocity inversion: the case of Venosa, Italy, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 95, 2364–2372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040242" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/0120040242</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Ding et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Ding, Y., Mu, C., Wu, T., Hu, G., Zou, D., Wang, D., Li, W., and Wu, X.: Increasing cryospheric hazards in a warming climate, Earth-Sci. Rev., 213, 103500, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103500" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103500</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Eisen et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation> Eisen, O., Hofstede, C., Miller, H., Kristoffersen, Y., Blenkner, R., Lambrecht, A., and Mayer, C.: A new approach for exploring ice sheets and sub-ice geology, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 91, 429–430, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Fäh et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Fäh, D., Kind, F., and Giardini, D.: A theoretical investigation of average H/V ratios, Geophys. J. Int., 145, 535–549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01406.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01406.x</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Finger et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Finger, D., Hugentobler, A., Huss, M., Voinesco, A., Wernli, H., Fischer, D., Weber, E., Jeannin, P.-Y., Kauzlaric, M., Wirz, A., Vennemann, T., Hüsler, F., Schädler, B., and Weingartner, R.: Identification of glacial meltwater runoff in a karstic environment and its implication for present and future water availability, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3261–3277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3261-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-17-3261-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Gajek et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Gajek, W., Gräff, D., Hellmann, S., Rempel, A. W., and Walter, F.: Diurnal expansion and contraction of englacial fracture networks revealed by seismic shear wave splitting, Communications Earth and Environment, 2, 209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00279-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-021-00279-4</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Gimbert et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Gimbert, F., Tsai, V. C., Amundson, J. M., Bartholomaus, T. C., and Walter, J. I.: Subseasonal changes observed in subglacial channel pressure, size, and sediment transport, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3786–3794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068337" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL068337</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Glacier Monitoring Switzerland(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Glacier Monitoring Switzerland: Swiss Glacier Mass Balance, release 2023, [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18750/massbalance.2023.r2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18750/massbalance.2023.r2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Grab et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Grab, M., Mattea, E., Bauder, A., Huss, M., Rabenstein, L., Hodel, E., Linsbauer, A., Langhammer, L., Schmid, L., Church, G., Hellmann, S.,Délèze, K., Schaer, P., Lathion, P., Farinotti, D., and Maurer, H.: Ice thickness distribution of all Swiss glaciers based on extended ground-penetrating radar data and glaciological modeling, J. Glaciol., 67, 1074–1092, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.55" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2021.55</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Guerin et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Guerin, G., Mordret, A., Rivet, D., Lipovsky, B. P., and Minchew, B. M.: Frictional origin of slip events of the Whillans Ice Stream, Antarctica, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL092950, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL092950</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Guillemot et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Guillemot, A., Bontemps, N., Larose, E., Teodor, D., Faller, S., Baillet, L., Garambois, S., Thibert, E., Gagliardini, O., and Vincent, C.: Investigating subglacial water-filled cavities by spectral analysis of ambient seismic noise: results on the polythermal Tête-Rousse Glacier (Mont Blanc, France), Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL105038, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GL105038</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Hallo et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Hallo, M., Imperatori, W., Panzera, F., and Fäh, D.: Joint multizonal transdimensional Bayesian inversion of surface wave dispersion and ellipticity curves for local near-surface imaging, Geophys. J. Int., 226, 627–659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggab116</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Harper and Humphrey(1995)</label><mixed-citation> Harper, J. T. and Humphrey, N. F.: Borehole video analysis of a temperate glacier'englacial and subglacial structure: implications for glacier flow models, Geology, 23, 901–904, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Harper et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Harper, J. T., Bradford, J. H., Humphrey, N. F., and Meierbachtol, T. W.: Vertical extension of the subglacial drainage system into basal crevasses, Nature, 467, 579–582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature09398</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Häusler et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Häusler, M., Michel, C., Burjánek, J., and Fäh, D.: Fracture network imaging on rock slope instabilities using resonance mode analysis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 6497–6506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL083201</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Herschy(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Herschy, R. W.: Stage-discharge relation, in: Encyclopedia of Hydrology and Lakes. Encyclopedia of Earth Science, Springer, Dordrecht, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4497-6_212" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/1-4020-4497-6_212</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Hobiger et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Hobiger, M., Bard, P.-Y., Cornou, C., and Le Bihan, N.: Single station determination of Rayleigh wave ellipticity by using the random decrement technique (RayDec), Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L14303,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038863" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL038863</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Hobiger et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Hobiger, M., Hallo, M., Schmelzbach, C., Stähler, S. C., Fäh, D., Giardini, D., Golombek, M., Clinton, J., Dahmen, N., Zenhäusern, G., Knapmeyer-Endrun, B., Carrasco, S., Charalambous, C., Hurst, K., Kedar, S., and Banerdt, W. B.: The shallow structure of Mars at the InSight landing site from inversion of ambient vibrations, Nat. Commun., 12, 6756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26957-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-021-26957-7</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Huss et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Huss, M., Bauder, A., Werder, M., Funk, M., and Hock, R.: Glacier-dammed lake outburst events of Gornersee, Switzerland, J. Glaciol., 53, 189–200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756507782202784" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756507782202784</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Huss et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Huss, M., Voinesco, A., and Hoelzle, M.: Implications of climate change on Glacier de la Plaine Morte, Switzerland, Geogr. Helv., 68, 227–237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-227-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gh-68-227-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Huss et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Huss, M., Bauder, A., Linsbauer, A., Gabbi, J., Kappenberger, G., Steinegger, U., and Farinotti, D.: More than a century of direct glacier mass-balance observations on Claridenfirn, Switzerland, J. Glaciol., 67, 697–713, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.22" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2021.22</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>King et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>King, E. C., Pritchard, H. D., and Smith, A. M.: Subglacial landforms beneath Rutford Ice Stream, Antarctica: detailed bed topography from ice-penetrating radar, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 151–158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-151-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-151-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Köhler and Weidle(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, A. and Weidle, C.: Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard, Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Kraaijenbrink et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Kraaijenbrink, P. D., Bierkens, M. F., Lutz, A. F., and Immerzeel, W.: Impact of a global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius on Asia's glaciers, Nature, 549, 257–260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23878" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature23878</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Kyrke-Smith et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Kyrke-Smith, T. M., Gudmundsson, G. H., and Farrell, P. E.: Can seismic observations of bed conditions on ice streams help constrain parameters in ice flow models?, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 122, 2269–2282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JF004373" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JF004373</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Langhammer et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Langhammer, L., Grab, M., Bauder, A., and Maurer, H.: Glacier thickness estimations of alpine glaciers using data and modeling constraints, The Cryosphere, 13, 2189–2202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2189-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-13-2189-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Lévêque et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Lévêque, J.-J., Maggi, A., and Souriau, A.: Seismological constraints on ice properties at Dome C, Antarctica, from horizontal to vertical spectral ratios, Antarct. Sci., 22, 572–579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102010000325" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0954102010000325</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Lindner et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Lindner, F., Laske, G., Walter, F., and Doran, A. K.: Crevasse-induced Rayleigh-wave azimuthal anisotropy on Glacier de la Plaine Morte, Switzerland, Ann. Glaciol., 60, 96–111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2018.25" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2018.25</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Lindner et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Lindner, F., Walter, F., Laske, G., and Gimbert, F.: Glaciohydraulic seismic tremors on an Alpine glacier, The Cryosphere, 14, 287–308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-287-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-14-287-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Llorens et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Llorens, M.-G., Griera, A., Bons, P. D., Gomez-Rivas, E., Weikusat, I., Prior, D. J., Kerch, J., and Lebensohn, R. A.: Seismic anisotropy of temperate ice in polar ice sheets, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 125, e2020JF005714, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005714" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JF005714</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Luthra et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Luthra, T., Anandakrishnan, S., Winberry, J. P., Alley, R. B., and Holschuh, N.: Basal characteristics of the main sticky spot on the ice plain of Whillans Ice Stream, Antarctica, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 440, 12–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.01.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2016.01.035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Mao et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Mao, S., Mordret, A., Campillo, M., Fang, H., and van der Hilst, R. D.: On the measurement of seismic traveltime changes in the time–frequency domain with wavelet cross-spectrum analysis, Geophys. J. Int., 221, 550–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz495" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggz495</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Maraschini and Foti(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Maraschini, M. and Foti, S.: A Monte Carlo multimodal inversion of surface waves, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 1557–1566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04703.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04703.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Molnar et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Molnar, S., Cassidy, J., Castellaro, S., Cornou, C., Crow, H., Hunter, J., Matsushima, S., Sánchez-Sesma, F., and Yong, A.: Application of microtremor horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (MHVSR) analysis for site characterization: state of the art, Surv. Geophys., 39, 613–631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9464-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10712-018-9464-4</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Mordret et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Mordret, A., Courbis, R., Brenguier, F., Chmiel, M., Garambois, S., Mao, S., Boué, P., Campman, X., Lecocq, T., Van der Veen, W., and Hollis, D.: Noise-based ballistic wave passive seismic monitoring – Part 2: surface waves, Geophys. J. Int., 221, 692–705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggaa016</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Nakamura(1989)</label><mixed-citation> Nakamura, Y.: A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface, Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports, 30, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Nanni et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Nanni, U., Gimbert, F., Vincent, C., Gräff, D., Walter, F., Piard, L., and Moreau, L.: Quantification of seasonal and diurnal dynamics of subglacial channels using seismic observations on an Alpine glacier, The Cryosphere, 14, 1475–1496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1475-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-14-1475-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Nanni et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Nanni, U., Gimbert, F., Roux, P., and Lecointre, A.: Observing the subglacial hydrology network and its dynamics with a dense seismic array, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2023757118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023757118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2023757118</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Nogoshi and Igarashi(1971)</label><mixed-citation> Nogoshi, M. and Igarashi, T.: On the amplitude characteristics of microtremor, Part II, Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan, 24, 26–40, 1971 (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Panzera et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Panzera, F., Lombardo, G., Monaco, C., and Di Stefano, A.: Seismic site effects observed on sediments and basaltic lavas outcropping in a test site of Catania, Italy, Nat. Hazards, 79, 1–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1822-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11069-015-1822-7</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Panzera et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Panzera, F., Romagnoli, G., Tortorici, G., D'Amico, S., Rizza, M., and Catalano, S.: Integrated use of ambient vibrations and geological methods for seismic microzonation, J. Appl. Geophys., 170, 103820, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103820" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103820</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Peterson(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Peterson, J.: Observations and modeling of seismic background noise, vol. 93, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA, No. 93-322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr93322" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3133/ofr93322</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Picotti et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Picotti, S., Vuan, A., Carcione, J. M., Horgan, H. J., and Anandakrishnan, S.: Anisotropy and crystalline fabric of Whillans Ice Stream (West Antarctica) inferred from multicomponent seismic data, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 4237–4262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011591" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JB011591</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Picotti et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Picotti, S., Francese, R., Giorgi, M., Pettenati, F., and Carcione, J. M.: Estimation of glacier thicknesses and basal properties using the horizontal-to-vertical component spectral ratio (HVSR) technique from passive seismic data, J. Glaciol., 63, 229–248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2016.135</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Podolskiy and Walter(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Podolskiy, E. A. and Walter, F.: Cryoseismology, Rev. Geophys., 54, 708–758, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000526" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000526</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Poggi and Fäh(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Poggi, V. and Fäh, D.: Estimating Rayleigh wave particle motion from three-component array analysis of ambient vibrations, Geophys. J. Int., 180, 251–267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04402.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04402.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Pohjola(1994)</label><mixed-citation> Pohjola, V. A.: TV-video observations of englacial voids in Storglaciären, Sweden, J. Glaciol., 40, 231–240, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Preiswerk and Walter(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Preiswerk, L. E. and Walter, F.: High-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Hz) ambient seismic noise on high-melt glaciers: Green's function estimation and source characterization, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 123, 1667–1681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004498" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JF004498</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Preiswerk et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Preiswerk, L. E., Michel, C., Walter, F., and Fäh, D.: Effects of geometry on the seismic wavefield of Alpine glaciers, Ann. Glaciol., 60, 112–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2018.27" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2018.27</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Sergeant et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Sergeant, A., Chmiel, M., Lindner, F., Walter, F., Roux, P., Chaput, J., Gimbert, F., and Mordret, A.: On the Green's function emergence from interferometry of seismic wave fields generated in high-melt glaciers: implications for passive imaging and monitoring, The Cryosphere, 14, 1139–1171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1139-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-14-1139-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Smith et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Smith, E. C., Baird, A. F., Kendall, J. M., Martín, C., White, R. S., Brisbourne, A. M., and Smith, A. M.: Ice fabric in an Antarctic ice stream interpreted from seismic anisotropy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 3710–3718, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL072093</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Snieder(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Snieder, R.: Extracting the Green's function from the correlation of coda waves: a derivation based on stationary phase, Phys. Rev. E, 69, 046610, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.046610" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.69.046610</ext-link>, 2004. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Tsai(1970)</label><mixed-citation> Tsai, N.: A note on the steady-state response of an elastic half-space, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 60, 795–808, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Turcotte and Schubert(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Turcotte, D. L. and Schubert, G.: Geodynamics, Cambridge University Press,  ISBN 9780511807442, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511807442</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Van Ginkel et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>van Ginkel, J., Ruigrok, E., and Herber, R.: Using horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios to construct shear-wave velocity profiles, Solid Earth, 11, 2015–2030, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-2015-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-11-2015-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>van Ginkel et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>van Ginkel, J., Ruigrok, E., Stafleu, J., and Herber, R.: Development of a seismic site-response zonation map for the Netherlands, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 41–63, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-41-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-22-41-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Walter et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Walter, F., Deichmann, N., and Funk, M.: Basal icequakes during changing subglacial water pressures beneath Gornergletscher, Switzerland, J. Glaciol., 54, 511–521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214308785837110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/002214308785837110</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Walter et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Walter, F., Roux, P., Roeoesli, C., Lecointre, A., Kilb, D., and Roux, P.-F.: Using glacier seismicity for phase velocity measurements and Green's function retrieval, Geophys. J. Int., 201, 1722–1737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggv069</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Wapenaar et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Wapenaar, K., Draganov, D., Snieder, R., Campman, X., and Verdel, A.: Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 1 – Basic principles and applications, Geophysics, 75, 75A195–75A209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3457445" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.3457445</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Wathelet et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Wathelet, M., Chatelain, J.-L., Cornou, C., Giulio, G. D., Guillier, B., Ohrnberger, M., and Savvaidis, A.: Geopsy: a user-friendly open-source tool set for ambient vibration processing, Seismol. Res. Lett., 91, 1878–1889, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190360" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/0220190360</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Wittlinger and Farra(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Wittlinger, G. and Farra, V.: Evidence of unfrozen liquids and seismic anisotropy at the base of the polar ice sheets, Polar Sci., 9, 66–79, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2014.07.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.polar.2014.07.006</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Yan et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Yan, P., Li, Z., Li, F., Yang, Y., Hao, W., and Bao, F.: Antarctic ice sheet thickness estimation using the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio method with single-station seismic ambient noise, The Cryosphere, 12, 795–810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-795-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-12-795-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Zhan(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Zhan, Z.: Seismic Noise Interferometry Reveals Transverse Drainage Configuration Beneath the Surging Bering Glacier, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4747–4756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082411" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL082411</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Swiss Seismological Service(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Swiss Seismological Service (SED): Temporary deployments in Switzerland associated with glacier monitoring,  ETH Zurich [data set] <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12686/SED/NETWORKS/4D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.12686/SED/NETWORKS/4D</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Spectral characteristics of seismic ambient vibrations reveal changes in the subglacial environment of Glacier de la Plaine Morte, Switzerland</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Albarello and Lunedei(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
       Albarello, D. and Lunedei, E.: Combining horizontal ambient vibration components for H/V spectral ratio estimates, Geophys. J. Int., 194, 936–951, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt130" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt130</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Antunes et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       Antunes, V., Planes, T., Obermann, A., Panzera, F., D'Amico, S., Mazzini, A., Sciarra, A., Ricci, T., and Lupi, M.: Insights into the dynamics of the Nirano Mud Volcano through seismic characterization of drumbeat signals and V/H analysis, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 431, 107619, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107619" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107619</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Aster and Winberry(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
       Aster, R. C. and Winberry, J. P.: Glacial seismology, Rep. Prog. Phys., 80, 126801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa8473" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa8473</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bard(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
       Bard, P.-Y.: Microtremor measurements: a tool for site effect estimation, in: Proceedings the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, 3, 1251–1279, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bartholomaus et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Bartholomaus, T. C., Amundson, J. M., Walter, J. I., O'Neel, S., West, M. E., and Larsen, C. F.: Subglacial discharge at tidewater glaciers revealed by seismic tremor, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 6391–6398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064590" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064590</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Behm et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Behm, M., Walter, J. I., Binder, D., Cheng, F., Citterio, M., Kulessa, B., Langley, K., Limpach, P., Mertl, S., Schöner, W., Tamstorf, M., and Weyss, G.: Seismic characterization of a rapidly-rising jökulhlaup cycle at the AP Olsen Ice Cap, NE-Greenland, J. Glaciol., 66, 329–347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.9</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bensen et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
       Bensen, G. D., Ritzwoller, M. H., Barmin, M. P., Levshin, A. L., Lin, F., Moschetti, M. P., Shapiro, N. M., and Yang, Y.: Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 1239–1260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Biot(1962)</label><mixed-citation>
       Biot, M. A.: Mechanics of Deformation and Acoustic Propagation in Porous Media, J. Appl. Phys., 33, 1482–1498, 1962.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bonilla et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
       Bonilla, L. F., Steidl, J. H., Lindley, G. T., Tumarkin, A. G., and Archuleta, R. J.: Site amplification in the San Fernando Valley, California: variability of site-effect estimation using the S wave, coda, and H/V methods, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 710–730, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0870030710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0870030710</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bonnefoy-Claudet et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
       Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., Cotton, F., and Bard, P.-Y.: The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies: a literature review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 79, 205–227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.07.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.07.004</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Brenguier et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Brenguier, F., Boué, P., Ben-Zion, Y., Vernon, F., Johnson, C., Mordret, A., Coutant, O., Share, P.-E., Beaucé, E., Hollis, D., and Lecocq, T.: Train traffic as a powerful noise source for monitoring active faults with seismic interferometry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 9529–9536, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083438" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083438</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Brenguier et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Brenguier, F., Courbis, R., Mordret, A., Campman, X., Boué, P., Chmiel, M., Takano, T., Lecocq, T., Van der Veen, W., Postif, S., and Hollis, D.: Noise-based ballistic wave passive seismic monitoring. Part 1: body waves, Geophys. J. Int., 221, 683–691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz440" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz440</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Brincker et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
       Brincker, R., Zhang, L., and Andersen, P.: Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition, Smart Mater. Struct., 10, 441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chaput et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       Chaput, J., Aster, R., Karplus, M., and Nakata, N.: Ambient high-frequency seismic surface waves in the firn column of central west Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 68, 785–798, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.135</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Chatelain et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      Chatelain, J. L., Guillier, B., Cara, F., Duval, A. M., Atakan, K., Bard, P. Y., and Wp02 Sesame Team: Evaluation of the influence of experimental conditions on H/V results from ambient noise recordings, B. Earthq. Eng., 6, 33–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9040-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9040-7</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Chieppa et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Chieppa, D., Hobiger, M., Bergamo, P., and Fäh, D.: Ambient vibration analysis on large scale arrays when lateral variations occur in the subsurface: a study case in Switzerland, Pure Appl. Geophys., 177, 4247–4269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02516-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02516-x</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Chmiel et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Chmiel, M., Roux, P., and Bardainne, T.: Extraction of phase and group velocities from ambient surface noise in a patch-array configuration, Geophysics, 81, KS231–KS240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0027.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0027.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Cook et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Cook, J. M., Hodson, A. J., and Irvine-Fynn, T. D.: Supraglacial weathering crust dynamics inferred from cryoconite hole hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 30, 433–446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10602" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10602</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Corciulo et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
       Corciulo, M., Roux, P., Campillo, M., Dubucq, D., and Kuperman, W. A.: Multiscale matched-field processing for noise-source localization in exploration geophysics, Geophysics, 77, KS33–KS41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0438.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0438.1</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Di Giacomo et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
       Di Giacomo, D., Gallipoli, M. R., Mucciarelli, M., Parolai, S., and Richwalski, S. M.: Analysis and modeling of HVSR in the presence of a velocity inversion: the case of Venosa, Italy, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 95, 2364–2372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040242" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040242</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Ding et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Ding, Y., Mu, C., Wu, T., Hu, G., Zou, D., Wang, D., Li, W., and Wu, X.: Increasing cryospheric hazards in a warming climate, Earth-Sci. Rev., 213, 103500, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103500" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103500</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Eisen et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Eisen, O., Hofstede, C., Miller, H., Kristoffersen, Y., Blenkner, R., Lambrecht, A., and Mayer, C.: A new approach for exploring ice sheets and sub-ice geology, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 91, 429–430, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Fäh et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
       Fäh, D., Kind, F., and Giardini, D.: A theoretical investigation of average H/V ratios, Geophys. J. Int., 145, 535–549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01406.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01406.x</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Finger et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
       Finger, D., Hugentobler, A., Huss, M., Voinesco, A., Wernli, H., Fischer, D., Weber, E., Jeannin, P.-Y., Kauzlaric, M., Wirz, A., Vennemann, T., Hüsler, F., Schädler, B., and Weingartner, R.: Identification of glacial meltwater runoff in a karstic environment and its implication for present and future water availability, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3261–3277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3261-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3261-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Gajek et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Gajek, W., Gräff, D., Hellmann, S., Rempel, A. W., and Walter, F.: Diurnal expansion and contraction of englacial fracture networks revealed by seismic shear wave splitting, Communications Earth and Environment, 2, 209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00279-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00279-4</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Gimbert et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Gimbert, F., Tsai, V. C., Amundson, J. M., Bartholomaus, T. C., and Walter, J. I.: Subseasonal changes observed in subglacial channel pressure, size, and sediment transport, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3786–3794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068337" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068337</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Glacier Monitoring Switzerland(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Glacier Monitoring Switzerland: Swiss
Glacier Mass Balance, release 2023, [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.18750/massbalance.2023.r2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18750/massbalance.2023.r2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Grab et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grab, M., Mattea, E., Bauder, A., Huss, M., Rabenstein, L., Hodel, E., Linsbauer, A., Langhammer, L., Schmid, L., Church, G., Hellmann, S.,Délèze, K., Schaer, P., Lathion, P., Farinotti, D., and Maurer, H.: Ice thickness distribution of all Swiss glaciers based on extended ground-penetrating radar data and glaciological modeling, J. Glaciol., 67, 1074–1092, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.55" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.55</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Guerin et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Guerin, G., Mordret, A., Rivet, D., Lipovsky, B. P., and Minchew, B. M.: Frictional origin of slip events of the Whillans Ice Stream, Antarctica, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL092950, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092950" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092950</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Guillemot et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Guillemot, A., Bontemps, N., Larose, E., Teodor, D., Faller, S., Baillet, L., Garambois, S., Thibert, E., Gagliardini, O., and Vincent, C.: Investigating subglacial water-filled cavities by spectral analysis of ambient seismic noise: results on the polythermal Tête-Rousse Glacier (Mont Blanc, France), Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL105038, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105038</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Hallo et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Hallo, M., Imperatori, W., Panzera, F., and Fäh, D.: Joint multizonal transdimensional Bayesian inversion of surface wave dispersion and ellipticity curves for local near-surface imaging, Geophys. J. Int., 226, 627–659, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab116</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Harper and Humphrey(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
       Harper, J. T. and Humphrey, N. F.: Borehole video analysis of a temperate glacier'englacial and subglacial structure: implications for glacier flow models, Geology, 23, 901–904, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Harper et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Harper, J. T., Bradford, J. H., Humphrey, N. F., and Meierbachtol, T. W.: Vertical extension of the subglacial drainage system into basal crevasses, Nature, 467, 579–582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09398</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Häusler et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Häusler, M., Michel, C., Burjánek, J., and Fäh, D.: Fracture network imaging on rock slope instabilities using resonance mode analysis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 6497–6506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083201</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Herschy(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      Herschy, R. W.: Stage-discharge relation, in: Encyclopedia of Hydrology and Lakes. Encyclopedia of Earth Science, Springer, Dordrecht, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4497-6_212" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4497-6_212</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Hobiger et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Hobiger, M., Bard, P.-Y., Cornou, C., and Le Bihan, N.: Single station determination of Rayleigh wave ellipticity by using the random decrement technique (RayDec), Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L14303,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038863" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038863</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Hobiger et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hobiger, M., Hallo, M., Schmelzbach, C., Stähler, S. C., Fäh, D., Giardini, D., Golombek, M., Clinton, J., Dahmen, N., Zenhäusern, G., Knapmeyer-Endrun, B., Carrasco, S., Charalambous, C., Hurst, K., Kedar, S., and Banerdt, W. B.: The shallow structure of Mars at the InSight landing site from inversion of ambient vibrations, Nat. Commun., 12, 6756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26957-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26957-7</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Huss et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
       Huss, M., Bauder, A., Werder, M., Funk, M., and Hock, R.: Glacier-dammed lake outburst events of Gornersee, Switzerland, J. Glaciol., 53, 189–200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756507782202784" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756507782202784</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Huss et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
       Huss, M., Voinesco, A., and Hoelzle, M.: Implications of climate change on Glacier de la Plaine Morte, Switzerland, Geogr. Helv., 68, 227–237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-227-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-227-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Huss et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Huss, M., Bauder, A., Linsbauer, A., Gabbi, J., Kappenberger, G., Steinegger, U., and Farinotti, D.: More than a century of direct glacier mass-balance observations on Claridenfirn, Switzerland, J. Glaciol., 67, 697–713, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.22" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.22</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>King et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       King, E. C., Pritchard, H. D., and Smith, A. M.: Subglacial landforms beneath Rutford Ice Stream, Antarctica: detailed bed topography from ice-penetrating radar, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 151–158, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-151-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-151-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Köhler and Weidle(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Köhler, A. and Weidle, C.: Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard, Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Kraaijenbrink et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
       Kraaijenbrink, P. D., Bierkens, M. F., Lutz, A. F., and Immerzeel, W.: Impact of a global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius on Asia's glaciers, Nature, 549, 257–260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23878" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23878</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Kyrke-Smith et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
       Kyrke-Smith, T. M., Gudmundsson, G. H., and Farrell, P. E.: Can seismic observations of bed conditions on ice streams help constrain parameters in ice flow models?, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 122, 2269–2282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JF004373" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JF004373</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Langhammer et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Langhammer, L., Grab, M., Bauder, A., and Maurer, H.: Glacier thickness estimations of alpine glaciers using data and modeling constraints, The Cryosphere, 13, 2189–2202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2189-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2189-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Lévêque et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lévêque, J.-J., Maggi, A., and Souriau, A.: Seismological constraints on ice properties at Dome C, Antarctica, from horizontal to vertical spectral ratios, Antarct. Sci., 22, 572–579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102010000325" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102010000325</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Lindner et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lindner, F., Laske, G., Walter, F., and Doran, A. K.: Crevasse-induced Rayleigh-wave azimuthal anisotropy on Glacier de la Plaine Morte, Switzerland, Ann. Glaciol., 60, 96–111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2018.25" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2018.25</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Lindner et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lindner, F., Walter, F., Laske, G., and Gimbert, F.: Glaciohydraulic seismic tremors on an Alpine glacier, The Cryosphere, 14, 287–308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-287-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-287-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Llorens et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Llorens, M.-G., Griera, A., Bons, P. D., Gomez-Rivas, E., Weikusat, I., Prior, D. J., Kerch, J., and Lebensohn, R. A.: Seismic anisotropy of temperate ice in polar ice sheets, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 125, e2020JF005714, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005714" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005714</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Luthra et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Luthra, T., Anandakrishnan, S., Winberry, J. P., Alley, R. B., and Holschuh, N.: Basal characteristics of the main sticky spot on the ice plain of Whillans Ice Stream, Antarctica, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 440, 12–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.01.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.01.035</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Mao et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Mao, S., Mordret, A., Campillo, M., Fang, H., and van der Hilst, R. D.: On the measurement of seismic traveltime changes in the time–frequency domain with wavelet cross-spectrum analysis, Geophys. J. Int., 221, 550–568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz495" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz495</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Maraschini and Foti(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Maraschini, M. and Foti, S.: A Monte Carlo multimodal inversion of surface waves, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 1557–1566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04703.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04703.x</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Molnar et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
       Molnar, S., Cassidy, J., Castellaro, S., Cornou, C., Crow, H., Hunter, J., Matsushima, S., Sánchez-Sesma, F., and Yong, A.: Application of microtremor horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (MHVSR) analysis for site characterization: state of the art, Surv. Geophys., 39, 613–631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9464-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9464-4</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Mordret et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Mordret, A., Courbis, R., Brenguier, F., Chmiel, M., Garambois, S., Mao, S., Boué, P., Campman, X., Lecocq, T., Van der Veen, W., and Hollis, D.: Noise-based ballistic wave passive seismic monitoring – Part 2: surface waves, Geophys. J. Int., 221, 692–705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa016</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Nakamura(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nakamura, Y.: A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface, Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports, 30, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Nanni et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nanni, U., Gimbert, F., Vincent, C., Gräff, D., Walter, F., Piard, L., and Moreau, L.: Quantification of seasonal and diurnal dynamics of subglacial channels using seismic observations on an Alpine glacier, The Cryosphere, 14, 1475–1496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1475-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1475-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Nanni et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nanni, U., Gimbert, F., Roux, P., and Lecointre, A.: Observing the subglacial hydrology network and its dynamics with a dense seismic array, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2023757118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023757118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023757118</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Nogoshi and Igarashi(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nogoshi, M. and
Igarashi, T.: On the amplitude characteristics of microtremor, Part II,
Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan, 24, 26–40, 1971 (in Japanese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Panzera et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Panzera, F., Lombardo, G., Monaco, C., and Di Stefano, A.: Seismic site effects observed on sediments and basaltic lavas outcropping in a test site of Catania, Italy, Nat. Hazards, 79, 1–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1822-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1822-7</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Panzera et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Panzera, F., Romagnoli, G., Tortorici, G., D'Amico, S., Rizza, M., and Catalano, S.: Integrated use of ambient vibrations and geological methods for seismic microzonation, J. Appl. Geophys., 170, 103820, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103820" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103820</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Peterson(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
       Peterson, J.: Observations and modeling of seismic background noise, vol. 93, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA, No. 93-322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr93322" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr93322</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Picotti et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Picotti, S., Vuan, A., Carcione, J. M., Horgan, H. J., and Anandakrishnan, S.: Anisotropy and crystalline fabric of Whillans Ice Stream (West Antarctica) inferred from multicomponent seismic data, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 4237–4262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011591" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011591</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Picotti et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
       Picotti, S., Francese, R., Giorgi, M., Pettenati, F., and Carcione, J. M.: Estimation of glacier thicknesses and basal properties using the horizontal-to-vertical component spectral ratio (HVSR) technique from passive seismic data, J. Glaciol., 63, 229–248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.135</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Podolskiy and Walter(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Podolskiy, E. A. and Walter, F.: Cryoseismology, Rev. Geophys., 54, 708–758, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000526" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000526</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Poggi and Fäh(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Poggi, V. and Fäh, D.: Estimating Rayleigh wave particle motion from three-component array analysis of ambient vibrations, Geophys. J. Int., 180, 251–267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04402.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04402.x</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Pohjola(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
       Pohjola, V. A.: TV-video observations of englacial voids in Storglaciären, Sweden, J. Glaciol., 40, 231–240, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Preiswerk and Walter(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
       Preiswerk, L. E. and Walter, F.: High-frequency ( &gt; 2&thinsp;Hz) ambient seismic noise on high-melt glaciers: Green's function estimation and source characterization, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 123, 1667–1681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004498" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004498</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Preiswerk et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Preiswerk, L. E., Michel, C., Walter, F., and Fäh, D.: Effects of geometry on the seismic wavefield of Alpine glaciers, Ann. Glaciol., 60, 112–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2018.27" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2018.27</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Sergeant et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Sergeant, A., Chmiel, M., Lindner, F., Walter, F., Roux, P., Chaput, J., Gimbert, F., and Mordret, A.: On the Green's function emergence from interferometry of seismic wave fields generated in high-melt glaciers: implications for passive imaging and monitoring, The Cryosphere, 14, 1139–1171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1139-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1139-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Smith et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
       Smith, E. C., Baird, A. F., Kendall, J. M., Martín, C., White, R. S., Brisbourne, A. M., and Smith, A. M.: Ice fabric in an Antarctic ice stream interpreted from seismic anisotropy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 3710–3718, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072093</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Snieder(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
       Snieder, R.: Extracting the Green's function from the correlation of coda waves: a derivation based on stationary phase, Phys. Rev. E, 69, 046610, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.046610" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.046610</a>, 2004.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Tsai(1970)</label><mixed-citation>
       Tsai, N.: A note on the steady-state response of an elastic half-space, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 60, 795–808, 1970.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Turcotte and Schubert(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Turcotte, D. L. and Schubert, G.: Geodynamics, Cambridge University Press,  ISBN
9780511807442, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807442" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807442</a>,
2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Van Ginkel et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       van Ginkel, J., Ruigrok, E., and Herber, R.: Using horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios to construct shear-wave velocity profiles, Solid Earth, 11, 2015–2030, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-2015-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-2015-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>van Ginkel et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       van Ginkel, J., Ruigrok, E., Stafleu, J., and Herber, R.: Development of a seismic site-response zonation map for the Netherlands, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 41–63, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-41-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-41-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Walter et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
       Walter, F., Deichmann, N., and Funk, M.: Basal icequakes during changing subglacial water pressures beneath Gornergletscher, Switzerland, J. Glaciol., 54, 511–521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214308785837110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/002214308785837110</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Walter et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Walter, F., Roux, P., Roeoesli, C., Lecointre, A., Kilb, D., and Roux, P.-F.: Using glacier seismicity for phase velocity measurements and Green's function retrieval, Geophys. J. Int., 201, 1722–1737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv069</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Wapenaar et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Wapenaar, K., Draganov, D., Snieder, R., Campman, X., and Verdel, A.: Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 1 – Basic principles and applications, Geophysics, 75, 75A195–75A209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3457445" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3457445</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Wathelet et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Wathelet, M., Chatelain, J.-L., Cornou, C., Giulio, G. D., Guillier, B., Ohrnberger, M., and Savvaidis, A.: Geopsy: a user-friendly open-source tool set for ambient vibration processing, Seismol. Res. Lett., 91, 1878–1889, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190360" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190360</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Wittlinger and Farra(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Wittlinger, G. and Farra, V.: Evidence of unfrozen liquids and seismic anisotropy at the base of the polar ice sheets, Polar Sci., 9, 66–79, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2014.07.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2014.07.006</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Yan et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
       Yan, P., Li, Z., Li, F., Yang, Y., Hao, W., and Bao, F.: Antarctic ice sheet thickness estimation using the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio method with single-station seismic ambient noise, The Cryosphere, 12, 795–810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-795-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-795-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Zhan(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhan, Z.: Seismic Noise Interferometry Reveals Transverse Drainage Configuration Beneath the Surging Bering Glacier, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4747–4756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082411" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082411</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Swiss Seismological Service(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Swiss Seismological Service (SED): Temporary deployments in Switzerland associated with glacier
monitoring,  ETH Zurich [data set] <a href="https://doi.org/10.12686/SED/NETWORKS/4D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.12686/SED/NETWORKS/4D</a>, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
