<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-18-5573-2024</article-id><title-group><article-title>The influence of firn layer material properties on surface crevasse propagation in glaciers and ice shelves</article-title><alt-title>Influence of firn layer material properties on surface crevasse propagation</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Clayton</surname><given-names>Theo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Duddu</surname><given-names>Ravindra</given-names></name>
          <email>ravindra.duddu@vanderbilt.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4205-0247</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Hageman</surname><given-names>Tim</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7770-7440</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff4 aff1">
          <name><surname>Martínez-Pañeda</surname><given-names>Emilio</given-names></name>
          <email>emilio.martinez-paneda@eng.ox.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1562-097X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ravindra Duddu (ravindra.duddu@vanderbilt.edu) and Emilio Martínez-Pañeda (emilio.martinez-paneda@eng.ox.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>December</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>5573</fpage><lpage>5593</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>5</day><month>March</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>March</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>September</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>October</month><year>2024</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2024 Theo Clayton et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e130">Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) models have been used to estimate crevasse depths in glaciers and to represent iceberg calving in ice sheet models. However, existing LEFM models assume glacier ice to be homogeneous and utilize the mechanical properties of fully consolidated ice. Using depth-invariant properties is not realistic as the process of compaction from unconsolidated snow to firn to glacial ice is dependent on several environmental factors, typically leading to a lower density and Young's modulus in upper surface strata. New analytical solutions for longitudinal-stress profiles are derived using depth-varying properties based on borehole data from the Ronne Ice Shelf and are used in an LEFM model to determine the maximum penetration depths of an isolated crevasse in grounded glaciers and floating ice shelves. These maximum crevasse depths are compared to those obtained for homogeneous glacial ice, showing the importance of including the effect of the upper unconsolidated firn layers on crevasse propagation. The largest reductions in the penetration depth ratio were observed for shallow grounded glaciers, with variations in Young's modulus being more influential than firn density (maximum differences in crevasse depth of 46 % and 20 %, respectively), whereas firn density changes resulted in an increase in penetration depth for thinner floating ice shelves (95 %–188 % difference in crevasse depth between constant and depth-varying properties). Thus, our study shows that the firn layer can increase the vulnerability of ice shelves to fracture and calving, highlighting the importance of considering depth-dependent firn layer material properties in LEFM models for estimating crevasse penetration depths and predicting rift propagation.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>UK Research and Innovation</funding-source>
<award-id>MR/V024124/1</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Natural Environment Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>2446853</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851</funding-source>
<award-id>TH</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>Office of Polar Programs</funding-source>
<award-id>PLR-1847173</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>National Aeronautics and Space Administration</funding-source>
<award-id>80NSSC21K1003</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e142">The formation of surface and basal crevasses as a consequence of deformation in ice sheets plays an influential role in glacial mass balance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.1"/>. Crevasses are predominantly mode-I (tensile) fractures that propagate vertically downwards to the depth at which they stabilize (i.e. maximum crevasse depth), depending on the longitudinal-stress state normal to the fracture surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.2"/>. Fracture propagation can be further aided by the accumulation of meltwater within surface crevasses, the supply and storage of which can be attributed to supraglacial lakes and firn aquifers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.3"/>. This can trigger a process called hydrofracture, wherein the meltwater in the crevasse exerts additional opening stress on the crevasse walls <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.4"/>. If the volume of meltwater is sufficiently large, hydrofracture can cause full-thickness crevasse propagation and lead to large-scale iceberg calving events from ice shelves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.5"/> and to increases in basal sliding rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.6"/>. Glacial mass loss caused by the calving events represents one of the leading contributors to global sea level rise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e167">The first study to examine crevasse propagation in glaciers and ice sheets was conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.8"/>, who proposed an analytical zero-stress model. The so-called Nye zero-stress model assumed that crevasses are dry and that ice has no resistance to fracturing; thus, a crevasse will propagate to a depth at which tensile stresses are completely offset by the compressive overburden pressure due to gravitational self-weight. The zero stress was later adapted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.9"/> to accommodate for the presence of meltwater in crevasses. Nevertheless, this simplistic model agreed well with observational results for fields of closely spaced crevasses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.10"/>, where neighbouring crevasses provide shielding effects in relation to crack tip singularities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.11"/>. However, it underestimates the depths of isolated crevasses, where this shielding effect is not present. Therefore, linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) models were introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx49" id="text.12"/> to model these isolated surface and basal crevasses.</p>
      <p id="d2e185">LEFM models capture the effects of the stress singularity (assuming that the resulting plastic zone around the crack tip is sufficiently small) by evaluating the stress intensity factor at the crack tip. The role of crack size and orientation, ice thickness, and applied loading conditions can be captured through the evaluation of the stress intensity factor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.13"/>. Using the principle of superposition, the LEFM models include the contributions from the tensile normal stress, the lithostatic compressive stress, and the meltwater pressure. The LEFM approach has been combined with full-Stokes models to study surface and basal crevasse propagation in Thwaites Glacier, with results agreeing well with NASA's radar penetration depths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.14"/>. In addition, LEFM models have been used to map the vulnerability of Antarctic ice shelf crevasses subject to meltwater-driven hydrofracture, with projections agreeing well with existing fractures being mapped by neural networks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.15"/>. The LEFM approach has been successfully combined with boundary element methods, capturing the interactions between basal and surface crevasses and providing estimates regarding the stability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.16"/> and evolution of crevasse shape <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.17"/>. However, while analytical LEFM models are computationally efficient and can be implemented into numerical ice sheet models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.18"/>, they do not account for the role of creep deformation or of depth-varying ice material properties in crevasse propagation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.19"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e210">In recent years, several studies focused on the development of computational approaches for modelling crevasse propagation in grounded glaciers and floating ice shelves. Notably, continuum damage mechanics (CDM) approaches were developed to describe more complex thermo-hydro-mechanical phenomena, but they are computationally more intensive compared to zero-stress and LEFM approaches. Such approaches can capture the effects of viscous deformation and long-term stress states on crevasses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.20"/> and can be readily implemented into Stokes-based ice flow models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.21"/>. Recent studies have developed phase field fracture models that formulate LEFM crack propagation criteria within the CDM framework, thus unifying the two approaches <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.22"/>. Additionally, CDM-based models can be useful in assessing the accuracy of LEFM and zero-stress models and in understanding the conditions under which their predictions are valid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e226">While the above-mentioned LEFM and CDM studies capture a range of mechanical interactions, they assume glacial ice to be a homogeneous material, with the values of mechanical properties taken as constants equal to those of fully consolidated ice. In reality, glacial ice forms from the accumulation of snowfall at the upper surface and undergoes compaction as a result of the overburden pressure, the rate of which is dependent on accumulation rates and surrounding temperatures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.24"/>. Moreover, snowflakes are restructured into smaller ice crystals due to wind, which then deform into more stable, compact crystal arrangements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.25"/>; this causes large differences in the porosity, density, and strength of these top snow layers, referred to as firn, and the deeper glacial ice. Neglecting firn layers leads to an overestimation of mechanical properties in the upper strata <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.26"/>. This is of particular importance for geological media subject to self-gravitational loading <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.27"/> because the driving stresses are dependent on the mechanical properties in such layered or vertically graded materials. The main hypothesis of this study is that accounting for these depth-dependent material parameters in the LEFM framework would alter the crevasse penetration depths in glaciers and ice shelves.</p>
      <p id="d2e241">The aim of this article is to explore the importance of including firn layer effects on surface crevasse propagation. To this end, we determine the maximum crevasse depths in idealized glaciers and ice shelves assuming two different material conditions: fully consolidated homogeneous ice and vertically graded ice as reported from ice core samples, with depth-varying material properties. We derive the analytical solution for the far-field longitudinal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with depth-dependent properties, which primarily drives the vertical propagation of mode-I crevasses. Next, we systematically investigate the effect of varying each material property in the unconsolidated firn layers through parametric studies as follows: using only the depth-variant density in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>, using only the depth-variant Young's modulus in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>, and using both the depth-variant density and depth-variant Young's modulus in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>. We then conduct fracture mechanics studies in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> for a grounded glacier using the analytical LEFM models presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.28"/> and verify the models' accuracy with the stress-based phase field fracture model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.29"/>. Through variations in meltwater depth ratios in water-filled surface crevasses and in ocean water heights in marine-terminating glaciers, the conditions under which depth-dependent material properties are influential are explored. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, these studies are extended to floating ice tongues. Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> considers the effects of assuming that crevasses develop rapidly (as linear elastic) versus slowly (as non-linear viscous), and we summarize all the findings in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S7"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e281">Schematic diagram showing the geometry and boundary conditions of a grounded glacier containing a single surface crevasse.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e292">Profile of depth-dependent mechanical properties for ice density (red, bottom axis) and Young's modulus (blue, top axis). Data extracted from ice core specimens from the Ronne Ice Shelf by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.30"/> are displayed as markers. Isotropic properties are displayed with the dotted lines.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Analytical solutions for the longitudinal stress</title>
      <p id="d2e312">We consider a grounded glacier with an idealized rectangular geometry of height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. We neglect lateral shear and restrict the domain to a flow line near the terminus, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> representing the along-flow and vertical coordinates. As the out-of-plane length of the glacier is typically much longer than its length, the plane strain assumption is exploited to reduce the three-dimensional glacier geometry to a two-dimensional (height and length) representation. A visual representation of the geometry and boundary conditions can be found in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Horizontal displacements are restrained in the far left of the domain to prevent rigid body motion, and a free-slip boundary condition is applied by restraining vertical displacements at the base (represented by rollers). The upper surface is defined as a traction-free surface, representing the atmosphere–ice interface. The load contributions considered are the gravitational self-weight, ocean water pressure at the far-right terminus, and meltwater pressure in the crevasse. Note that, under the small-deformation assumption, this representation of the grounded glacier is identical to that of a floating ice shelf <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.31"/> in the far-field region.</p>
      <p id="d2e349">The far-field longitudinal stress (based on the long-wavelength approximation) within the grounded glacier or ice shelf was derived for the case of steady-state creep with constant (i.e. depth-independent) and homogeneous material properties by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.32"/>. Recently, this longitudinal stress was derived for compressible linear elasticity by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.33"/> as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M6" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Poisson's ratio, assumed to be equal for firn and ice; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is gravitational acceleration; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of fully consolidated glacial ice; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the seawater density; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the seawater height above the glacier bed. We use the convention that positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to tensile stresses, creating and propagating crevasses, whereas negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is compressive, thus stabilizing the glacier and preventing the formation of crevasses. This analytical stress will be used throughout this paper to compare between the cases with homogeneous (given by the above equation) and depth-dependent (derived in the remainder of this section) material properties. The Poisson ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> used within our results represents ice as a linear elastic compressible solid, which is a common assumption for rapidly propagating cracks. If the crevassing process occurs on a timescale well below the Maxwell timescale, ranging from hours to days depending on the strain rate due to the non-linear viscous nature, the assumption of compressibility would be valid. If, instead, the crevassing process occurs slowly, over the span of weeks, the assumption of incompressibility would be valid; thus, a Poisson ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will allow for the model derived here to be applicable over longer timescales. Results for this incompressible case are given in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>, whilst results for a depth-dependent  Poisson ratio are presented in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e586">As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, ice core sample data from the Ronne Ice Shelf, gathered and presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.34"/>, indicate large variations in material properties within the firn and meteoric ice layers forming the upper 150 m of the ice core. The ice core data for density can be fitted using the following exponential equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.35"/>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M18" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of the unconsolidated upper surface firn layers, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the height of the glacier, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical coordinate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the base of the glacier, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the surface), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a constant taken as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.36"/>. This constant gives an indication of the thickness of the firn layer: at the surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the density of the glacier is equal to that of the unconsolidated firn; at a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below the surface, the density is in between that of firn and ice at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the density of ice; and at a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below the surface, the density of the glacier is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the density of consolidated ice.</p>
      <p id="d2e825">The ice core sample data for elastic modulus from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> can be fitted using a similar function as that used for the density, including the depth-dependent Young's modulus:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M32" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>GPa</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is Young's modulus for solid ice, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>GPa</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is Young's modulus for unconsolidated upper surface firn layers, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a tuned constant. Here, we have chosen to use a single constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to describe the depth variations in both density and Young's modulus. While this is not necessary for the derivation of the analytic solutions, the interpretation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a length scale of the firn layer thickness indicates that Young's modulus is directly proportional to density and is inherently related to porosity, similarly to porous metallic foams <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.37"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e957">In the remainder of this section, analytical expressions are derived for the longitudinal stresses driving the creation of crevasses. We first consider two cases wherein only the density or Young's modulus is depth-varying so as to isolate and examine the influence of each property on the maximum crevasse penetration depth. For the third and final case, we consider both properties to be depth-varying, which is the real-case scenario.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Depth-varying density</title>
      <p id="d2e967">We consider it to be that only the density is depth-dependent following Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), while Young's modulus is constant throughout the full thickness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.38"/>. The lithostatic compressive stress for this density distribution is
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M38" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denoting the gravitational acceleration. By substituting Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) for the depth-dependent density and integrating over the depth, the vertical stress component is obtained as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M40" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The above relation consists of a linear stress contribution from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an exponential term that reduces the net lithostatic stress when considering the effects of firn density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This solution can be simplified to the homogeneous ice case when considering <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1149">Exploiting the plane strain assumption <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> allows for the out-of-plane stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be found in terms of longitudinal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lithostatic stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M48" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Assuming small strains and small rotations, the longitudinal strain can then be written in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by using Hooke's law and Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M51" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Following this, the membrane strain assumption is adopted due to the thickness of the glacier being several orders of magnitude smaller than the length. The longitudinal strain is therefore invariant with depth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.39"/>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M52" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Note that the above condition can be derived using Föppl–von Kármán equations describing the large deflections of thin flat plates. Applying this constraint to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) allows for the derivative of the horizontal stress to be found:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M53" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          leading to a far-field longitudinal stress of
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an integration constant that can be interpreted as the depth-invariant tensile resistive stress. Substituting the lithostatic compressive stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) gives the following:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M57" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          It can be observed that the far-field longitudinal stress is composed of two components: the lithostatic compressive-stress component, which is always negative and thus is responsible for crevasse closure, and the resistive tensile stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is responsible for crevasse opening. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.40"/> conjectured that the inclusion of firn density into the LEFM model would lead to deeper crevasse propagation because the magnitude of the lithostatic compressive stress would be reduced; however, the reduction in tensile resistive stress was not considered. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.41"/> stated that “accounting for the lower firn density almost doubles the penetration depth of surface crevasses compared to the constant density model”. To properly account for the influence of firn density, we evaluate the indefinite integration constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, appearing in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>), by considering force equilibrium over the entire thickness in the longitudinal direction as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M60" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the hydrostatic force  as a result of the ocean water pressure at the glacier front. From this equilibrium between the glaciological longitudinal stress and the ocean water pressure at the terminus, we find the resistive tensile stress as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Negative values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, together with the lithostatic compressive stress, prevent crevasse propagation, whereas crevasses can only nucleate when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeds the lithostatic stress.</p>
      <p id="d2e1955">Substituting the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the far-field longitudinal stress of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>) gives the following analytical solution:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M66" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          This solution can be simplified to the one for the far-field longitudinal stress in the depth-invariant case, as in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), when considering <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The first term indicates that homogeneous land-terminating glaciers develop crevasses up to half their thickness (based on the zero-stress model), whereas the second (negative) term due to the ocean water height reduces the crack-driving stress, thereby providing a stabilizing effect. The third term includes the influence of the depth-dependent density over the stress that is a function of the vertical coordinate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; this term is negative near the top surface, thus stabilizing the top firn layers, but it tends toward a positive constant in the bottom regions of the glacier, thus increasing the propensity for deeper crevasse propagation below a certain depth. Thus, the inclusion of depth-dependent density can thwart or promote deeper crevasse propagation depending on the glacier and ocean water heights, which is more nuanced than the description by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.42"/>, who neglected any influence of depth-varying density on resistive stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Depth-varying Young's modulus</title>
      <p id="d2e2201">We next derive the relation for far-field longitudinal stress considering a depth-variant elastic modulus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The depth-dependent longitudinal strain is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M71" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> given by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>). In the depth-invariant modulus cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> simply gets eliminated with Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>), leading to a horizontal stress that is independent of Young's modulus, as given by  Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>). However, in the depth-dependent modulus case, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> does not get eliminated from the far-field longitudinal stress with the membrane strain assumption. However, the longitudinal strain must be depth invariant, as required by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>), and so we get
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>16</label><mml:math id="M75" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          This can then be rearranged to obtain the following expression for the horizontal stress derivative:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E17" content-type="numbered"><label>17</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          This derivation can be simplified to the depth-invariant case if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Solving the above ordinary differential equation yields the following longitudinal stress for constant density:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E18" content-type="numbered"><label>18</label><mml:math id="M78" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an integration constant that can be determined using force equilibrium in the longitudinal direction, as defined by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E12"/>), which yields
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E19" content-type="numbered"><label>19</label><mml:math id="M80" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=""><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open=""><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Substituting the above into Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E18"/>), we obtain the longitudinal-stress distribution for the depth-varying Young's modulus and constant-density case as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E20" content-type="numbered"><label>20</label><mml:math id="M81" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>where </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          As expected, the solution for the variable Young's modulus case can be simplified to the far-field longitudinal stress for the depth-invariant case, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Notably, the variable density only provided an additional term to the homogenous case, but the variable Young's modulus also alters all the terms in the longitudinal-stress relation.  Including the effects of the firn layer's modulus redistributes the contribution of the horizontal ocean water pressure, where its contribution is less near the surface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and greater near the base (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Depth-varying Young's modulus and density</title>
      <p id="d2e3310">The final stress relationship we derive is for the case with the depth-varying density and Young's modulus using Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), respectively. We do not show the full details of the derivation as it is similar to that in the previous sections. We use the horizontal stress derivative given in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E17"/>) and substitute the lithostatic compressive stress and derivative from Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>). This gives us an ordinary differential equation that is solved using MATLAB's symbolic toolkit to obtain the longitudinal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E21" content-type="numbered"><label>21</label><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the indefinite integration constant, which can be found using force equilibrium.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E22" content-type="numbered"><label>22</label><mml:math id="M89" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=""><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close="" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open=""><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Substituting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> back into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gives the final expression:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E23" content-type="numbered"><label>23</label><mml:math id="M92" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where Young's modulus ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E20"/>). The above equation can be reduced to the analytic relation for depth-dependent density in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>) if Young's modulus is constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and can be reduced to the analytical relation for the depth-dependent Young's modulus, as in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E20"/>), if the density is constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Limitations of analytical LEFM models</title>
      <p id="d2e4036">There are a few limitations to be noted regarding the outcomes of the LEFM models used in this study (refer to the Appendices). First, the depth variations of the mechanical properties are assumed based on borehole samples from ice cores in the Ronne Ice Shelf; therefore, they may not be fully representative of other Antarctic ice shelves or glaciers elsewhere. For example, temperate glaciers that are subject to higher rates of melting and refreezing will undergo a faster rate of densification due to meltwater percolating into pore spaces and refreezing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.43"/>. Thus, the process of firn densification is dependent on environmental factors including accumulation rates, overburden pressure, temperature, and local strain rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.44"/>. For instance, Seward Glacier, Yukon, Canada, is fully consolidated at a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in contrast to sites on the Greenland Ice Sheet where transitions from firn to glacial ice occur at depths of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.45"/>. Data from surrounding borehole samples should therefore be considered when assessing the depth to which crevasses propagate to include the effects of firn layer properties.</p>
      <p id="d2e4072">The fracture analysis used in the following sections also assumes that, over short timescales, ice behaves as an elastic compressive material (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with crevasses propagating rapidly in a brittle manner. However, in reality, ice behaves like an incompressible fluid over longer timescales, with viscous deformation being described using Glen's flow law <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.46"/>. The effects of time-dependent deformation can be included in an ad hoc manner by taking the stress from Stokes-based formulations and using LEFM to propagate crevasses in a staggered manner <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.47"/>. Furthermore, the cracking conditions can be more complex than those that can be addressed with a simple analytical model (e.g. multiple crevasse interactions). To account for non-linear behaviour and problems of arbitrary complexity, one can utilize phase field fracture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.48"/>, cohesive zone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.49"/>, or nonlocal creep damage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.50"/> models. However, these non-linear models are computationally costly and not so easy to implement within numerical ice sheet models, and so analytical LEFM models are desirable.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results for grounded glaciers</title>
      <p id="d2e4112">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows the analytical solutions of the far-field longitudinal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a land-terminating grounded glacier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Each subfigure includes the longitudinal stress versus depth profiles for depth-varying properties (derived in the previous section) and those of the homogeneous case. In addition to the analytical solutions, numerical results from the finite-element solver COMSOL Multiphysics are plotted for the verification of our analytic expressions. The analytical solutions derived are identical to the numerical results, confirming the correctness of the presented expressions along with the appropriateness of the membrane strain assumption.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4168">Far-field longitudinal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the depth of a land-terminating glacier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), showing the effects of the <bold>(a)</bold> depth-varying density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(b)</bold> depth-varying Young's modulus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and <bold>(c)</bold> depth-varying density and Young's modulus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Numerical results are obtained from COMSOL Multiphysics for constant (crosses) and depth-varying properties (circles). The analytical solutions for depth-varying properties are given in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>), (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E20"/>), and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E23"/>) and are represented by the green lines. The vertical dashed line indicates the zero-stress level.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e4274">Using these stress solutions, we predicted crevasse depths based on an analytical LEFM model, as described in the Appendices. For grounded glaciers with free tangential slip at the base, we use the “double-edge crack” weight functions (refer to Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>) as this was shown to yield stress intensity factors that are consistent with those calculated using the displacement correlation method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.51"/>. Specifically, we consider the evolution of an isolated surface crevasse within a grounded glacier of height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming damage to initialize beneath a pre-specified surface crack of depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To further verify the LEFM results, we conducted phase field fracture (PFF) simulations with the same configuration used for LEFM studies but with a pre-existing surface notch of depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and width <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The PFF model simulations capture the non-linear propagation of the crack driven by the mechanical stress beneath the notch until it reaches a final and/or stabilized crevasse depth. For a full description of this PFF model, we refer the reader to our recent work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.52"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4353">The comparison of the crevasse depth ratios (i.e. the final crevasse depth normalized with the ice thickness) obtained from LEFM and PFF models is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. As the ocean water depth is increased, the glacier is subjected to increased compressive hydrostatic pressure at the glacier terminus, which suppresses crevasse growth. The surface crevasse depth ratio decreases non-linearly with the ocean water depth ratio, which is consistent with previous research works <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.53"/>. In each of the depth-varying-property cases in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, we obtained excellent agreement between LEFM and PFF models, which serves as a verification of our LEFM implementation. However, the nuanced differences in crevasse propagation results for each of the cases are discussed in the sections below.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4365">Normalized crevasse depth predictions versus ocean water height ratio for a single isolated dry crevasse in a linear elastic ice sheet considering homogeneous and depth-dependent mechanical properties.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="Ch1.F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4376">Normalized crevasse depth predictions versus meltwater depth ratio for a single isolated crevasse in a linear elastic ice sheet considering homogeneous and depth-dependent mechanical properties for an ocean water height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Influence of depth-varying density</title>
      <p id="d2e4409">If the material properties of ice are assumed to be depth-independent then the longitudinal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies linearly with depth according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). In the case of a land-terminating glacier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with free tangential slip at the base, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile is symmetrical about the centre line (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This stress is tensile in the regions above the centre line, with a maximum value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>kPa</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the top surface for ice thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m (blue line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). If a depth-dependent density is incorporated (green line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a), the maximum value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">235</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>kPa</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a non-linear distribution in the upper region. Approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below the top surface, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tends towards a linear distribution, with the compressive stress nearer to the base being slightly less than that compared to the homogeneous case due to the reduced weight of the ice. We next discuss parametric studies to explore the effect of depth variations on crevasse propagation.</p>
      <p id="d2e4564">The first parametric study considers a dry (air-filled) crevasse, with different values of ocean water height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The normalized crevasse depths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) obtained using LEFM for this case are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a. For land-terminating glaciers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the crevasse propagates to the full thickness of the glacier for both the homogeneous and depth-varying cases because there is no compressive ocean water pressure to arrest crevasse growth. However, as ocean water height is increased, the stabilized crevasse depth is reduced, and the inclusion of the depth-varying density comes into effect and further reduces the stabilized crevasse depth. With ocean water heights of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the longitudinal stress is compressive enough that the crevasse will not grow beyond the initial specified depth of 10 m. To verify the accuracy of the LEFM model (solid line) results presented here, we also show the results obtained from the phase field fracture model (markers) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.54"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4636">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, the relation between the crevasse depth ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the meltwater depth ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the thinner glacier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is shown. The ocean water height is fixed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both the homogeneous-density (blue line) and depth-varying-density (red line) scenarios. The largest reduction of 20 % in the stabilized crevasse depth is observed for a dry crack (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) when considering the effect of depth-varying density. The additional tensile stress provided by the presence of meltwater allows the surface crevasse to penetrate deeper into the strata, with full fracture occurring for meltwater depth ratios greater than 0.5 in both scenarios.</p>
      <p id="d2e4722">As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a, the inclusion of the firn layer reduces the longitudinal stress in the upper regions of the glacier and tends towards the homogeneous-stress profile in the consolidated strata. The effect of this stress variation can be understood from  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. As the meltwater depth ratio is increased, the crevasse penetrates deeper into the glacier, and the influence of the firn layer on the stress state disappears; thus, the crevasse depth for the depth-varying case agrees with the homogeneous case for all  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We found that the normalized crevasse depth ratio is insensitive to the glacier thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the homogeneous case because the thickness only controls the magnitude of the longitudinal stress but not the depth at which the stress becomes compressive. However, in the depth-varying case, the normalized crevasse depth ratio is sensitive to the glacier thickness but converges with the homogeneous case for thicker glaciers. For example, the maximum percentage difference in the crevasse depth ratio between the depth-varying and homogeneous cases is 20 %, 4.5 %, and 1 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Influence of depth-varying Young's modulus</title>
      <p id="d2e4812">The influence of a variable Young's modulus on the far-field longitudinal stress is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b. It can be observed that there is a greater deviation from the homogeneous case relative to the depth-varying density case. In the upper regions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is further reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>kPa</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the stress profile is highly non-linear. However, at lower depths where the firn is fully consolidated into ice, the stress profile becomes linear. The maximum compressive stress at the glacier base is less due to the reduction in overburden pressure in the upper strata. Notably, the depth at which the stress becomes zero increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the homogeneous case to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the variable Young's modulus case. However, the stress intensity factor at the crevasse tip decreases due to a reduction in the magnitude of longitudinal stress; thus, the firn layer causes a reduction in crevasse penetration depth.</p>
      <p id="d2e4866">We now consider the propagation of an isolated dry crevasse for the depth-varying Young's modulus scenario using the LEFM model and the longitudinal-stress relation derived in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E20"/>). The results for the parametric study evaluating the normalized  crevasse depths for various ocean water heights <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are presented in  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b. Similarly to the results in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a, the dry crevasse propagates to the same depth in the depth-varying and homogeneous cases for low ocean water heights. Because the crevasse propagates deeper into the fully consolidated ice regions, the properties of the firn layer have little impact on crevasse depth. As the ocean water height increases, the compressive-stress-resisting crevasse propagation increases, and so the crevasse growth is arrested at a shallower depth. The influence of the variable Young's modulus can be observed in these intermediate ocean water heights (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as the crevasse depth is reduced when accounting for the firn layers. The maximum difference in crevasse depth is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at an ocean water height of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For ocean water heights greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the crevasse does not propagate beyond the initial specified depth of 10 m.</p>
      <p id="d2e4956">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, we report the normalized crevasse depth ratio versus the meltwater depth ratio considering the depth-varying Young's modulus (black line). The largest reductions in crevasse depth are observed for the thinner glacier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a dry crevasse, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.378</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> in the homogeneous case to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.209</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> in the depth-varying case. The difference in normalized crevasse depth is reduced as the meltwater depth ratio increases because the crevasse penetrates deeper into the fully consolidated strata, thus reducing the influence of firn properties. For thicker glaciers, the difference between the homogeneous and depth-varying Young's modulus cases is smaller, which is attributed to the increase in magnitude of far-field longitudinal stress based on our stress analysis. The maximum percentage difference in crevasse depths for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Influence of depth-varying Young's modulus and density</title>
      <p id="d2e5096">The next set of results entails the propagation of an isolated surface crevasse driven by the longitudinal stress considering both the depth-varying Young's modulus and the depth-varying density shown in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E23"/>). The stabilized crevasse depths for a dry crevasse in a grounded glacier of height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated using LEFM and the phase field method for various ocean water heights <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are presented in  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c. As expected, for lower ocean water heights, the crevasse depths are in agreement with the homogeneous case due to the crevasse penetrating deeper into the compressive regions of the glacier. We observe the largest reductions in crevasse depths for intermediate values of ocean water height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas the crevasse does not propagate beyond the initially specified depth for ocean water heights greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this case (red line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c).</p>
      <p id="d2e5164">The relationship between stabilized crevasse depth ratios and meltwater depth ratios is presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> for three different glacier thicknesses (green lines). For the thinnest glacier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the longitudinal stress is significantly reduced in the upper regions due to the lower stiffness and density of the firn layer, which prevents the dry crevasse from propagating beyond the initially specified depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to a crevasse depth ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.378</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for the homogeneous case. The difference in crevasse depth ratios is reduced with increasing meltwater depth ratios because the crevasse propagates deeper into the consolidated ice strata. Full-depth propagation is achieved for meltwater depth ratios  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The percentage difference in penetration depth for the dry crevasse is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.21</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Overall, we find that the influence of depth-varying firn material properties is less in thicker glaciers; however, the effect is more prominent if the variation in both Young's modulus and density with depth is considered.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e5278">Schematic diagram showing the applied boundary conditions of a floating ice shelf containing an isolated surface crevasse.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results for floating ice shelves</title>
      <p id="d2e5296">The final set of results entails the propagation of surface crevasses in floating ice shelves. We consider an idealized rectangular ice shelf geometry of variable height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m. Three types of external loads act on the ice shelf: gravitational self-weight, causing a body force, and ocean water pressure and meltwater pressure in the crevasse, causing surface forces. A Robin-type boundary condition is applied at the base of the ice shelf because the buoyancy pressure is a function of the vertical displacement <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The far-left terminus is constrained to prevent free body motion; the top surface is considered to be traction-free; and the Neumann boundary condition is applied on the right edge to account for the ocean water pressure, similarly to the grounded-glacier case. A schematic diagram representing the applied boundary conditions is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5358">The floatation heights for the buoyancy pressure are found by assuming local hydrostatic equilibrium. For the homogeneous ice case, this can be simplified to the ratio of ice density to ocean water density – that is, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the inclusion of the depth-varying density profile leads to a reduction in the applied gravitational body force, causing a decrease in the floatation height. We evaluate the reduced floatation heights for each ice shelf thickness by integrating the depth-varying density profile over the entire ice shelf thickness and dividing by the thickness and ocean water density. Thus, we find that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7560</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8268</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8629</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8809</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m. For deeper ice shelves, the material properties of the firn layer become less significant as its thickness is small relative to ice shelf thickness; therefore, the floatation depth tends towards the homogeneous case for thicker ice shelves.</p>
      <p id="d2e5486">Because of the buoyancy condition at the base and the dependence on ice shelf deflection, the analytical solutions for longitudinal stress derived in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>, <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>, and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/> are not appropriate in the regions closer to the terminus. In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.55"/>, we showed that, faraway from the terminus, the longitudinal stress in the ice shelf agreed well with analytical solutions for grounded glaciers. Therefore, we use finite-element analysis to extract the longitudinal-stress data as a function of the vertical coordinate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the horizontal position <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4750</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m (i.e. 250 m from the ice shelf terminus). The data are fitted to a sixth-order polynomial equation, with coefficients presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.T3"/> in the Appendix, which defines the stress function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Surface crevasses in the far-field region are ignored because the longitudinal stress is significantly compressive, preventing their propagation, regardless of whether the crevasses were filled with meltwater or not. The propagation of surface crevasses close to the terminus (ice–ocean front) is investigated by estimating the final and/or stabilized crevasse depth using LEFM. The LEFM model used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.56"/> (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>) is appropriate for floating ice shelves as this was shown to match numerically calculated stress intensity factors using the displacement correlation method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.57"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e5552">Normalized crevasse depths for a dry (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) isolated surface crevasse within a floating ice shelf close to the front (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4750</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m), calculated using the LEFM method in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.58"/>. Bracketed values represent the difference in crevasse depth between the variational and homogeneous cases normalized by the crevasse depth for homogeneous ice, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>depth-dep</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>uniform</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>uniform</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.099</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.080 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.250 (151.8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.194 (95.0 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.127</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.080 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.203 (59.8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.174 (37.4 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.129</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.108 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.167 (28.8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.156 (20.3 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.121</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.114 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.138 (14.0 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.134 (10.7 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e5967">Normalized crevasse depths for an isolated surface crevasse with a meltwater depth ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within a floating ice shelf close to the front (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4750</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m), calculated using the LEFM method in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.59"/>. Bracketed values represent the difference in crevasse depth between the variational and homogeneous cases normalized by the crevasse depth for homogeneous ice, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>depth-dep</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>uniform</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>uniform</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.317</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.294 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.911 (187.1 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.914 (187.9 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.362</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.359 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.649 (79.2 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.651 (79.8 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.370</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.370 (0.0 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.512 (38.4 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.513 (38.6 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.375</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.374 (-0.3 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.447 (19.2 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.445 (18.7 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e6365">Normalized crevasse depth predictions versus meltwater depth ratio for an isolated surface crevasse close to the front in a floating ice shelf.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e6374">Crevasse penetration depths versus meltwater depth ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the LEFM model are presented graphically in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. Penetration depths for the dry crevasse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are also reported in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, respectively, for ease of comparing data points. For the homogeneous ice case, there is minimal influence over the normalized crevasse depth by increasing glacier thickness (blue lines); for example, the maximum difference in penetration depth for the dry crevasse is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.022</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when increasing the ice shelf thickness. Surface crevasses with low levels of meltwater only penetrate a few metres below the surface due to the longitudinal-stress profile being predominantly compressive due to the high ocean water pressure. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, an incremental increase in meltwater does not result in significant crevasse growth. Full-fracture propagation is only observed when crevasses are almost fully filled with meltwater (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where the meltwater pressure is sufficient to overcome the compressive longitudinal stress.</p>
      <p id="d2e6500">Considering the depth-varying Young's modulus leads to a minor reduction in stabilized crevasse depth (black lines), with no growth occurring beyond the initial notch for meltwater depth ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m. Penetration depths match with the homogeneous case for meltwater depth ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the crevasse penetrates deeper into the ice strata. The influence of the depth-varying Young's modulus is reduced with increasing ice shelf thickness. This is the most noticeable for the crevasse depths reported in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> as the percentage difference between the depth-varying modulus and homogeneous cases is reduced to 1 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m.</p>
      <p id="d2e6574">Considering the depth-varying density in the fracture analysis results in surface crevasses propagating deeper into the ice strata (red lines), with a dry crevasse propagating to a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.250</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.099</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for homogeneous ice within an ice shelf of thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m. This is in contrast to the grounded-glacier case (where crevasse depth decreased) and can be attributed to the reduction in overburden pressure and the reduced buoyancy height specific to ice shelves. The inclusion of meltwater within the crevasse results in an increased penetration depth, and full-thickness fracture is achieved for meltwater depth ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The largest differences in penetration depth for the depth-varying density compared to in the homogeneous case are observed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. For thin ice shelves (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) and a meltwater depth ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the crevasse propagates approximately 3 times deeper when accounting for the depth-varying density. Similarly to the grounded-glacier case, the influence of the depth-varying density is reduced when the ice shelf thickness increases due to a larger proportion of ice being fully consolidated. However, there are still some differences in penetration depth compared to the homogeneous case for thick ice shelves (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m), with a percentage difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the dry crevasse and of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6724">Including the effects of both depth-varying density and depth-varying modulus highlights that density is the more prominent property influencing surface crevasse propagation in ice shelves. It is observed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> that the majority of results for depth-varying density and modulus (green lines) overlap with the depth-varying density results (red lines). The exception to this is for dry crevasses in thin ice shelves, where the stabilized penetration depth is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.194</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when considering only the depth-varying density.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Non-linear viscous incompressible rheology</title>
      <p id="d2e6758">The above analysis has considered ice to behave as a linear elastic compressible solid, with a Poisson ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is based on the assumption that crevasse propagation occurs in a rapid brittle manner, such that the cracking occurs on a timescale well below the Maxwell time (typically on the order of hours to days for glacial ice). However, it is more common in the glaciology literature to assume that glacier ice deformed over long timescales well before the nucleation and propagation of crevasses. Also, if the slow development of crevasses is considered, with crevasse depths stabilizing over a span of weeks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.60"/>, then ice should be considered to be a viscous material. The analytical solution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.61"><named-content content-type="pre">see Appendix A in</named-content></xref> for the stress state of a grounded glacier with incompressible linear elastic rheology and that of one with an incompressible non-linear viscous rheology are the same. Therefore, in this study, we simply set the Poisson ratio to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to prevent numerical issues) to obtain the background stress. In addition, we conduct finite-element simulations for a grounded glacier, including the viscoelastic contributions (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of ice flow modelled through Glen's flow law, and extract numerical values of the longitudinal stress. To illustrate that the stress state is only sensitive to the incompressibility assumption and not to the linear elastic or non-linear viscous rheology, we plot the longitudinal-stress profile for a land-terminating (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) grounded glacier considering linear elastic compressibility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), linear elastic incompressibility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and a non-linear viscous rheology in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e6861">Far-field longitudinal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the depth of a land-terminating glacier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), showing the effects of depth-varying density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> considering linear elastic compressibility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), linear elastic incompressibility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and a non-linear viscous rheology.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e6937">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> shows that if ice is considered to be linear elastic incompressible (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the obtained stress solution  matches with the steady-state creep stress state derived by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.62"/> for depth-independent density and matches stress profiles obtained through simulations using a visco-elastic rheology. We observe that stresses are more extensional in the upper surface and more compressive at the base when considering incompressibility and that the stress obtained through simulations is independent of ice rheology (Glen's law creep coefficients) once a sufficiently long time has passed. For the homogeneous case, the longitudinal stress varies linearly with depth and is symmetrical about the centre line <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similarly to the linear elastic compressible case, the inclusion of depth-dependent density results in a reduction in both the lithostatic stress contribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the resistive stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both material rheologies.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e7005">Normalized crevasse depth predictions versus ocean water height ratio for a single isolated dry crevasse in a grounded glacier considering compressible (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and incompressible (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) homogeneous and depth-dependent mechanical properties of ice.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e7038">The longitudinal-stress profiles presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> are used to drive crevasse propagation in the linear elastic fracture mechanics study. Values of crevasse penetration depth for an isolated dry crevasse in a grounded glacier, subject to different values of ocean water height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>. The solid-line curves represent incompressible ice, whilst the dashed lines represent compressible ice of Poisson ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Considering ice to be an incompressible solid leads to deeper crevasse penetration depths compared to linear elastic compressibility, but these crevasses follow a similar trend as that observed for the compressible case. Accounting for the depth-varying properties of the firn layer in grounded glaciers leads to two different regimes of crevasse growth behaviour. If the resistive stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is large (e.g. a low ocean water height), the firn layer promotes crevasse propagation, and the crevasse penetrates to a slightly greater depth than in the constant-density case; this result is in agreement with the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.63"/> study. In contrast, if the resistive stress is small (e.g. high ocean water height) then the firn layer stunts crevasse propagation, and the crevasse depth would be greater in the constant-density case; this result contradicts the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.64"/> study. We note that, even if the Nye zero-stress criterion is used (assuming densely spaced cracks) instead of using LEFM to consider a single isolated crevasse, this finding of the two different crevasse growth regimes holds true.</p>
      <p id="d2e7089">Comparing the effects of assuming an incompressible and/or viscous rheology, the percentage difference in penetration depth when considering depth-dependent density for a dry crevasse of ocean water height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced to 4 % compared to 20 % for linear elastic compressibility. The ocean water height required to prevent any development of dry crevasses differs, with values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being sufficient for compressible depth-dependent density cases, whereas ocean water levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are required for the incompressible case. Comparing this to the cases in which no density variations are considered still shows a similar trend, with higher ocean water levels being needed to stabilize crevasses when density variations are not considered.</p>
      <p id="d2e7143">Finally, we consider water-filled surface crevasses in floating ice shelves of height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5000</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using a non-linear viscous ice rheology. Similarly to the linear elastic compressible case, we consider surface crevasses at the horizontal position <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4750</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (250 m from the ice shelf terminus) and extract the longitudinal-stress profiles from the finite-element analysis. We plot the stabilized crevasse depth versus meltwater depth ratio for the non-linear viscous (NLV) rheology in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> along with the results for linear elastic (LE) compressibility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and incompressibility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e7223">Normalized crevasse depth predictions versus meltwater depth ratio for a single isolated surface crevasse located close to the ice shelf front (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4750</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) considering a linear elastic (LE) and non-linear viscous (NLV) rheology.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e7249">When comparing the stabilized crevasse depths close to the front, we note that the penetration depth is independent of ice rheology, which is in contrast to the grounded-glacier case. For the homogeneous density, minimal crevasse propagation is observed for meltwater depth ratios below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with full-thickness propagation only occurring when fractures are close to saturation. The inclusion of the depth-dependent density results in deeper crevasse penetration depths, with minimal differences in penetration depth between the linear elastic cases and the non-linear viscous rheology. This likely indicates that, for crevasses close to the front, fracture is driven by the flotation height and the bending stresses due to the floating condition. For depth-dependent density, the reduction in flotation height leads to an increase in tensile stress in the upper surface due to increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and increased bending stress. In addition, the lithostatic component of longitudinal stress is reduced, leading to deeper crevasse propagation when including firn density.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F11"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e7290">Normalized crevasse depth predictions versus meltwater depth ratio for a single isolated surface crevasse located in the far-field region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) considering a linear elastic (LE) and non-linear viscous (NLV) rheology.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e7315">We also consider the propagation of an isolated surface crevasse located in the far-field region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) of a floating ice shelf, with results presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>. As shown previously, for the linear elastic compressible rheology, the stress state is fully compressive for both the homogeneous- and the depth-dependent-density case; thus, no crevasse propagation is observed regardless of the meltwater depth ratio. By contrast, when considering the non-linear viscous rheology of ice, surface crevasses may propagate in the far-field region if there is sufficient meltwater pressure present. Large increases in crevasse penetration depth are observed for meltwater depth ratios greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with full-thickness propagation being observed close to crevasse saturation at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similarly to crevasses near the front, the inclusion of depth-dependent density results in increased crevasse penetration depths compared to the homogeneous-density scenario. Thus, similar conclusions can be drawn for both elastic and viscous rheologies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e7384">An important finding of this paper is that the inclusion of the depth-varying mechanical properties of unconsolidated ice strata results in a reduction in both the lithostatic compressive-stress component and the resistive tensile-stress component. Contrarily to the conventional understanding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.65"/>, we find that accounting for depth-varying density and modulus can lead to an overall reduction in surface crevasse depths in grounded glaciers. This is because, in some scenarios, the reduction in resistive stress can hinder crevasse propagation more than the increase in crevasse propagation resulting from the reduction in lithostatic stress. Thus, our study suggests that firn layers can have a stabilizing effect by curtailing surface crevasse growth in grounded glaciers.</p>
      <p id="d2e7390">Assuming ice to be a linear elastic compressible material, we find that considering depth-varying Young's modulus has a greater influence on crevasse depths than density in thinner glaciers. For example, considering depth-varying density results in a maximum percentage difference of 20 % in the penetration depth of dry crevasses compared to a maximum percentage difference of 45 % when considering the depth-varying Young's modulus. The largest reductions in crevasse depths are observed in thinner glaciers (depths of approximately 100–150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where the stabilizing effects of the firn layers seem to be more prominent. Larger meltwater depth ratios are required to propagate surface crevasses in thinner ice shelves, whereas, in thicker glaciers, the influence of firn density is less (in some cases negligible), and so surface crevasses propagate deeper into the fully consolidated strata. Thus, our study reveals that LEFM models assuming homogeneous ice properties are valid for crevasse depth estimation in thicker glaciers with ice thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m.</p>
      <p id="d2e7413">Accounting for depth-varying density in the floating-ice-shelf case increases the penetration depth of surface crevasses close to the ice–ocean front, with this increase being caused by reductions in buoyancy height and lithostatic compressive stresses. The effect of depth-varying density is dominant in thinner ice shelves, but it can still impact surface crevasse propagation in ice shelves as thick as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, although this would be to a lesser extent. For instance, the crevasse depth ratio increases to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (188 % increase compared to homogeneous case) for thin ice shelves (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas a 19 % increase is observed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick ice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Considering the depth-varying Young's modulus in the floating-ice-shelf case reduces surface crevasse depth for low meltwater depths slightly, and the effect becomes less significant in thicker ice shelves. This study suggests that, as the ice shelves become thinner due to increased basal melting in warmer oceans, the effects of the firn layer can make them more vulnerable by allowing deeper crevasse propagation. However, without the presence of any meltwater, full-depth penetration of surface crevasses in ice shelves may not be possible. Therefore, an important aspect to explore in a future study is the effect of the firn layer on basal crevasse propagation in ice shelves, which likely controls rift formation and iceberg calving.</p>
      <p id="d2e7490">The analytical (closed-form) and numerical (polynomial-fitted) solutions developed in this paper provide a more realistic description of the longitudinal stress in glaciers and ice shelves. The effect of depth-varying firn and/or ice properties could be accounted for in the shallow-shelf approximation (SSA) and could be coupled with LEFM models to potentially enable the prediction of rift propagation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.66"/> proposed a simple method for estimating crevasse depths in an ice shelf, wherein the longitudinal stress calculated from the full-Stokes model was used to evaluate the stress intensity factors based on an LEFM model. A similar approach can be developed to estimate crevasse depths from shallow-shelf models or remote sensing data. In Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S4"/>, we discuss how the 2D stress fields obtained from a shallow-ice-shelf model can be augmented to include the depth-dependent density and Young's modulus. This stress can then be used within an analytical LEFM model to predict crevasse depth and calving.</p>
      <p id="d2e7499">We acknowledge that there are a few limitations in the current study. Firstly, we assume our glacier and/or ice shelf geometry to be a 2D rectangle with the free-slip condition at the base, which is highly idealized and does not consider any contributions from frictional sliding at the base for the grounded case or buttressing stresses for floating ice shelves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.67"/>. Another limitation of the current model is that the rate of firn consolidation is assumed to be uniform, with a horizontal position, and is assumed to be unaffected by glacier thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, firn densification is dependent on environmental factors including accumulation rates, overburden pressure, temperature, and local strain rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.68"/>. Firn densification near terminus regions or in thinner glaciers potentially results in a thinner firn layer and thus a reduced value of the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating a shorter length scale for the transition between firn and dense ice properties. However, while the findings presented here are all based on the density profiles from the Ronne Ice Shelf <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.69"/>, the analytic models (and provided MATLAB code) allow for an easy way to evaluate the impact for specific firn heights. This makes it possible to estimate the impact of including firn properties on the crevasse depth for specific locations.</p>
      <p id="d2e7525">One final limitation of our analytic models is related to water-filled crevasses. While we investigate the effects of including the effect of firn on the density and Young's modulus, both these effects are (partially) driven by the porosity of the firn. However, when water-filled crevasses are considered, no model is included to account for water leaking from the crevasse into the surrounding firn. For colder ice sheets and deeper crevasses, where the full water contents are surrounded by ice of sub-zero temperatures, this assumption is reasonable: any water that seeps into the surrounding ice or firn will freeze, creating an impermeable ice layer surrounding the crevasse, which will prevent water from permeating further into the firn <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.70"/>. As these ice layers are typically very thin, they do not alter the mechanical properties of the ice. However, if more temperate glaciers are considered or if one considers conditions where water-filled crevasses do not penetrate to a considerable depth, the firn and/or ice surrounding the crevasse might not be sufficiently cold to cause this ice layer to form. In such circumstances, the presented model will overestimate the crevasse depths obtained as the saturated firn will reduce the effects of the water pressure within the crevasse by re-distributing this pressure over a larger region surrounding the crevasse.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e7539">In this paper, we derived analytical equations for the far-field longitudinal stress, including the effects of surface firn layers, described by depth-varying density and Young's modulus profiles based on field data. These analytic expressions were used to perform fracture propagation studies on isolated air- and/or water-filled surface crevasses in grounded glaciers and ice shelves for the homogeneous (assuming fully consolidated glacial ice) and depth-varying ice cases. The derived analytical equations for the far-field longitudinal stress in grounded glaciers were verified with the stress profiles obtained through finite-element  analysis. We also used the phase field fracture model to validate the crevasse depths predicted by the LEFM model. The LEFM model results demonstrate the potentially large impact of including the properties of unconsolidated firn layers within the predictions of crevasse depths. For grounded glaciers, depth-varying firn properties inhibit crevasse propagation, requiring lower ocean water heights and larger meltwater depth ratios for full-depth propagation. In contrast, for floating ice shelves and/or tongues, the consideration of depth-varying firn properties promoted crevasse propagation, in some cases up to 3 times as deep. Thus, with regard to fracture and calving, the firn layer may have a stabilizing effect on grounded glaciers, whereas it may have a destabilizing effect on ice shelves. Overall, this study establishes the importance of including the depth dependence of firn layer material properties in crevasse models using LEFM. Additionally, we propose a simple scheme to integrate our analytical solutions with the stresses obtained from the shallow-shelf approximation, which can allow us to assess the vulnerability of ice shelves to calving, accounting for firn layer effects.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Analytical LEFM model</title>
      <p id="d2e7553">We evaluate the stress intensity factor (SIF) considering the contributions of normal tensile stress, lithostatic compressive stress, and meltwater pressure using an iterative code in MATLAB. An initial crevasse depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is suggested, and the net SIF is found by integrating over the crevasse depth due to the varying stress field with depth. The crevasse will continue to propagate if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>I</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger than the fracture toughness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which, for glacial ice, is taken as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MPa</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, found from experimental data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.71"/>. Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>I</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is proportional to the net longitudinal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the SIF will begin to be reduced once the crevasse penetrates into the compressive region of the ice. The net longitudinal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as the sum of the longitudinal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the meltwater pressure in the crevasse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E24" content-type="numbered"><label>A1</label><mml:math id="M302" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E25" content-type="numbered"><label>A2</label><mml:math id="M303" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="〉" open="〈"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        In the above, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the meltwater density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the elevation of the crevasse tip above the glacier base, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the meltwater height in the crevasse. The presence of the Macaulay brackets in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.E25"/>) indicates that the pressure is zero above the water surface.</p>
      <p id="d2e7813">The SIF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>I</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated using the following equation:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E26" content-type="numbered"><label>A3</label><mml:math id="M308" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>I</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a weight function dependent on the applied boundary conditions and domain geometry, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the trial crevasse depth. This selection has been debated in various literature sources <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.72"/>.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>Weight function for grounded glaciers with free tangential slip</title>
      <p id="d2e7928">For a grounded glacier undergoing free slip, we follow the double-edge crack formulation as this gives good agreement with SIFs calculated using the displacement correlation method with finite-element method (FEM) simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.73"/>. The weight function is taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.74"/> and takes the following form:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E27" content-type="numbered"><label>B1</label><mml:math id="M312" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where the functions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are defined as

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M315" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S2.E28"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>B2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S2.E29"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>B3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S2.E30"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>B4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <label>Appendix C</label><title>Weight function for floating ice shelves</title>
      <p id="d2e8233">For the floating-ice-shelf condition, it was found that the SIFs calculated using the weight function presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.75"/> gave better agreement with SIFs using the displacement correlation method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.76"/>. Therefore, the penetration depths in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> were calculated using the formulation below:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S3.E31" content-type="numbered"><label>C1</label><mml:math id="M316" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M317" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S3.E32"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>C2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=""><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S3.E33"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>C3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0719768</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.513476</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">61.1001</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1554.95</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">583.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">71</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">590.7</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">205</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">384</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">356</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">469</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">368</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">270</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">208</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">233</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">544</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S3.E34"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>C4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.246984</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.47583</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">176.456</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4058.76</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">303.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">181</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">755</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">551</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">904</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">936</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">863</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">531</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">940</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">729</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S3.E35"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>C5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.529659</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.3235</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">532.074</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5479.53</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">592.2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">388.6</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">128</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">746</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">246</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">780.7</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e8846">The longitudinal stress in the ice shelf cannot be determined analytically due to the bending-stress contribution from the floatation pressure at the base. The stress profiles at the front are obtained numerically (normalized with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and are fitted to a sixth-order polynomial equation, taking the general form below:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S3.E36" content-type="numbered"><label>C6</label><mml:math id="M320" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are non-dimensionalized stress coefficients that are presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.T3"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S3.T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table C1</label><caption><p id="d2e9028">Coefficients of normalized longitudinal stress in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.E36"/>) for a floating ice shelf at horizontal position <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4750</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.073</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.435</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.858</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.422</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.543</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.178</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.372</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.064</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.295</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.611</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.761</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.626</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.703</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.110</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> , <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.542</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.352</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.454</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.845</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.267</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.217</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.025</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.012</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.034</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.016</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.022</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.075</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.083</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.688</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.862</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.657</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.290</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.749</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.074</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.453</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.711</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.652</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.207</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.083</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.725</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.297</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.198</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.367</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.477</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.361</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.418</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.022</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.189</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.728</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.819</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.254</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.086</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.082</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.425</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.878</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.374</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.695</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.876</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.075</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.024</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.804</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.694</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.575</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.458</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.007</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.805</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.088</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.599</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.940</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.968</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.630</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.396</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.406</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.027</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.246</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.946</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.596</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.235</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.216</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.945</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.067</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<sup>−3</sup>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.490</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.657</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.390</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.540</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.324</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.028</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.030</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.506</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.453</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.248</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.077</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.674</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.751</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.066</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> , <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.858</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.931</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30.191</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.901</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.927</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.129</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.031</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e10706">The net SIFs from Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.E26"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.E31"/>) are numerically integrated over the crevasse depth, taking into account the variations in net longitudinal stress with depth. As the crevasse propagates into deeper strata, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>I</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced, and the crevasse stabilizes once <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>I</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S4">
  <label>Appendix D</label><title>Linking with shallow-ice-shelf models</title>
      <p id="d2e10754">Over longer timescales, ice sheet flow is described as an incompressible non-linear viscous-fluid-like model, where the elastic deformations are negligible compared to the viscous deformation. Therefore, the incompressible Stokes equations are used to solve for mass and momentum balance, wherein the volumetric stress or pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is constitutively indeterminate, and the deviatoric stress tensor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined by a non-linear viscous constitutive law as follows:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S4.E37" content-type="numbered"><label>D1</label><mml:math id="M445" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the strain rate tensor given by the symmetric part of the velocity gradient tensor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the second-order identity tensor, and the viscosity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined using a Bingham–Norton–Maxwell-type relation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.77"/> that accounts for shear-thinning behaviour.
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S4.E38" content-type="numbered"><label>D2</label><mml:math id="M449" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        In the above equation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the temperature-dependent creep coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the creep exponent, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the second invariant of the strain rate tensor. Notably, the strain rate tensor can be calculated using surface velocity obtained from remote sensing observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.78"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e10936">While it may not be impossible to simulate ice sheet flow using a full-Stokes model, this is currently too computationally expensive. The spatial discretization in the full-Stokes model is dictated by the ice thickness, which is much smaller than the in-plane dimensions of ice sheet–ice shelf systems, thus leading to an excessively refined mesh for resolving in-plane ice velocity. The shallow-ice-shelf approximation (SSA) simplifies the full-Stokes model by assuming that vertical shear is zero <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.79"/>, leading to the following depth-averaged governing equations in the horizontal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> directions:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S4.E39" content-type="numbered"><label>D3</label><mml:math id="M455" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the depth-integrated viscosity, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the upper surface elevation. Together with appropriate boundary conditions (e.g. velocity and terminus ocean water pressure), solving this equation provides an excellent approximation of the flow of ice sheets. Using the velocity components, we can determine the deviatoric stress components according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S4.E37"/>). Based on the assumption that the vertical stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is hydrostatic, we can determine the stress components in the plane of the ice shelf as follows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.80"/>:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S4.E40" content-type="numbered"><label>D4</label><mml:math id="M459" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the height-averaged stresses. Here, we propose an approximate way of linking the LEFM model for crevasse depth estimation with the SSA. Using the in-plane stresses in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S4.E40"/>), we can determine the principal values which correspond to the maximum and minimum normal stresses in the plane of the ice shelf. Assuming that crevasses open perpendicularly to the maximum principal stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we can determine the net force <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (per unit width out of plane) acting on the boundary as follows:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S4.E41" content-type="numbered"><label>D5</label><mml:math id="M463" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The force <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, if compressive, would have a similar effect as the ocean water pressure term in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E23"/>), and so it can be used to replace the term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the SSA stress solution can be augmented to include the effect of depth-varying density and modulus as follows:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S4.E42" content-type="numbered"><label>D6</label><mml:math id="M466" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The above stress can be used as the net stress to determine the stress intensity factor and to estimate the crevasse depth. We note that, depending on the discretization used for the numerical solution of the SSA, some of the details of the scheme would need modifications. In future work, we will establish the viability of coupling this scheme with the LEFM model with the shallow-shelf and other depth-integrated approximations.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S5">
  <label>Appendix E</label><title>Influence of depth-variable Poisson ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e11912">For the crevasse propagation studies previously presented, a depth-invariant Poisson's ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was assumed. However, it has been suggested that Poisson's ratio also exhibits a linear dependency on ice density and therefore leads to a depth-dependent profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.81"/>. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.82"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.83"/> provide a depth-dependent Poisson's ratio profile based on seismic velocity measurements conducted on ice cores. To study the effect of this depth-dependent Poisson ratio, a linear elastic fracture mechanics study is performed. We assume an exponential distribution of Poisson's ratio with depth, similarly to the density and Young's modulus distributions.
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S5.E43" content-type="numbered"><label>E1</label><mml:math id="M469" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        In the above, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Poisson's ratio of firn in the upper surface,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Poisson's ratio of fully consolidated ice, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the tuned constant. This profile approximates the observations from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.84"/>, where we have scaled the length parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to match our density and Young's modulus profiles as this profile was obtained at a different location (with significantly different ice sheet and firn thickness). As it is not possible to derive a fully analytic expression for the stress profiles with this depth-dependent Poisson's ratio, the longitudinal-stress profiles are obtained numerically using the finite-element method. The numerical stresses are then used to drive the propagation of the surface crevasse using LEFM.</p>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S5.F12"><label>Figure E1</label><caption><p id="d2e12051">Normalized crevasse depth predictions versus ocean water height ratio for a single isolated dry crevasse in a linear elastic ice sheet considering homogeneous and depth-dependent Poisson ratios.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/5573/2024/tc-18-5573-2024-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e12060">We consider a dry (air-filled) crevasse, with different values of ocean water height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and plot the normalized crevasse penetration depth versus ocean water height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S5.F12"/>. This figure shows that including variations in Poisson's ratio has a negligible effect as compared to density and Young's modulus variations. The largest percentage difference in crevasse depth was observed for intermediate ocean water levels, with an increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in crevasse depth with respect to the homogeneous case when considering a depth-dependent Poisson's ratio for an ocean water height of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The effect of including a depth-dependent Poisson's ratio is less influential compared to density and Young's modulus as depth-dependent density resulted in a reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the crevasse depth, and the depth-dependent Young's modulus resulted in a reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the crevasse depth. This study suggests that the inclusion of variations in Poisson ratio does not play a significant role in crevasse propagation.</p>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e12142">The analytic expressions for the stress state are provided in a MATLAB script to plot the stress–depth relations from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> for arbitrary input parameters. This additionally performs the LEFM analysis, producing the crevasse depths from  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. This code is provided at <uri>https://github.com/T-Clayton/LEFM_Firn_Inclusions</uri> (last access: 19 November 2024) and <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13911830" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.13911830</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.85"/>. No new datasets are used in this work, except for those generated and reproducible via the developed code.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e12161">TC: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing (original draft), visualization. RD: conceptualization, methodology, writing (review and editing). TH: conceptualization, writing (review and editing), supervision. EMP: conceptualization, resources, writing (review and editing), supervision, project administration, funding acquisition.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e12167">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e12173">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e12180">Theo Clayton received financial support from the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) via Grantham Institute – Climate Change and the Environment (project reference 2446853). Ravindra Duddu received funding support provided by the National Science Foundation's Office of Polar Programs via CAREER (grant no. PLR-1847173), NASA Cryosphere (award no. 80NSSC21K1003), and Royal Society via the International Exchanges programme (grant no. IES/R1/211032). Tim Hageman received financial support through the research fellowship scheme of the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851. Emilio Martínez-Pañeda received financial support from UKRI's Future Leaders Fellowship programme (grant no. MR/V024124/1).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e12186">This paper was edited by Josefin Ahlkrona and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Amory et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation> Amory, C., Buizert, C., Buzzard, S., Case, E., Clerx, N., Culberg, R., Datta, R. T., Dey, R., Drews, R., Dunmire, D., Eayrs, C., Hansen, N., Humbert, A., Kaitheri, A., Keegan, K., Kuipers Munneke, P., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lhermitte, S., Mair, D., McDowell, I., Mejia, J., Meyer, C. R., Morris, E., Moser, D., Oraschewski, F. M., Pearce, E., de Roda Husman, S., Schlegel, N.-J., Schultz, T., Simonsen, S. B., Stevens, C. M., Thomas, E. R., Thompson-Munson, M., Wever, N., Wouters, B., and The Firn Symposium team: Firn on Ice Sheets, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 5, 79–99, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Ashby et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Ashby, M., Evans, A., Fleck, N., Gibson, L., Hutchinson, J., and Wadley, H.: Chapter 4 – Properties of metal foams, in: Metal Foams, 40–54, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, ISBN 978-0-7506-7219-1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7219-1.X5000-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-7506-7219-1.X5000-4</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bassis and Walker(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Bassis, J. N. and Walker, C. C.: Upper and lower limits on the stability of calving glaciers from the yield strength envelope of ice, P. Roy. Soc. A, 468, 913–931, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Benn and Evans(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Benn, D. I. and Evans, D. J.: Glaciers &amp; glaciation, Taylor &amp; Francis Group, 2nd edn., ISBN 978-0340905791, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203785010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4324/9780203785010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Benn et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation> Benn, D. I., Warren, C. R., and Mottram, R. H.: Calving processes and the dynamics of calving glaciers, Earth-Sci. Rev., 82, 143–179, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Buck(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Buck, W. R.: The role of fresh water in driving ice shelf crevassing, rifting and calving, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 624, 118444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118444" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118444</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Buck and Lai(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Buck, W. R. and Lai, C.-Y.: Flexural Control of Basal Crevasse Opening Under Ice Shelves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL093110</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Buzzard et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Buzzard, S. C., Feltham, D. L., and Flocco, D.: A Mathematical Model of Melt Lake Development on an Ice Shelf, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 262–283, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017MS001155</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Chudley et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Chudley, T. R., Howat, I. M., Yadav, B., and Noh, M.-J.: Empirical correction of systematic orthorectification error in Sentinel-2 velocity fields for Greenlandic outlet glaciers, The Cryosphere, 16, 2629–2642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2629-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-16-2629-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Clayton and Hageman(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Clayton, T. and Hageman, T.: LEFM_Firn_Inclusions (v1.0), Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13911830" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.13911830</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Clayton et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Clayton, T., Duddu, R., Siegert, M., and Martínez-Pañeda, E.: A stress-based poro-damage phase field model for hydrofracturing of creeping glaciers and ice shelves, Eng. Fract. Mech., 272, 108693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108693" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108693</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Colgan et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation> Colgan, W., Rajaram, H., Abdalati, W., McCutchan, C., Mottran, R., Moussavi, M., and Grigsby, S.: Glacier crevasses: Observations, models, and mass balance implications, Rev. Geophys., 54, 119–161, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Duddu and Waisman(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Duddu, R. and Waisman, H.: A temperature dependent creep damage model for polycrystalline ice, Mech. Mater., 46, 23–41, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Duddu et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Duddu, R., Bassis, J., and Waisman, H.: A numerical investigation of surface crevasse propagation in glaciers using nonlocal continuum damage mechanics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3064–3068, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Duddu et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation> Duddu, R., Jiménez, S., and Bassis, J.: A non-local continuum poro-damage mechanics model for hydrofracturing of surface crevasses in grounded glaciers, J. Glaciol., 66, 415–429, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Enderlin and Bartholomaus(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Enderlin, E. M. and Bartholomaus, T. C.: Sharp contrasts in observed and modeled crevasse patterns at Greenland's marine terminating glaciers, The Cryosphere, 14, 4121–4133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4121-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-14-4121-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Fischer et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation> Fischer, M. P., Alley, R. B., and Engelder, T.: Fracture toughness of ice and firn determined from the modified ring test, J. Glaciol., 41, 383–394, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Frederikse et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation> Frederikse, T., Landerer, F., Caron, L., Adhikari, S., Parkes, D., Humphrey, V. W., Dangendorf, S., Hogarth, P., Zanna, L., Cheng, L., and Wu, Y. H.: The causes of sea-level rise since 1900, Nature, 584, 393–397, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Gao et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Y., Ghosh, G., Jiménez, S., and Duddu, R.: A finite-element-based cohesive zone model of water-filled surface crevasse propagation in floating ice tongues, Comput. Sci. Eng., 25, 8–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2023.3315661" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/MCSE.2023.3315661</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Glen(1955)</label><mixed-citation>Glen, J. W.: The creep of polycrystalline ice, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 228, 519–538, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.1955.0066</ext-link>, 1955.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Greve and Blatter(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Greve, R. and Blatter, H.: Dynamics of ice sheets and glaciers, Springer Science &amp; Business Media, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03415-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-03415-2</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Huth et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Huth, A., Duddu, R., and Smith, B.: A Generalized Interpolation Material Point Method for Shallow Ice Shelves. 2: Anisotropic Nonlocal Damage Mechanics and Rift Propagation, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002292, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002292" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020MS002292</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Huth et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Huth, A., Duddu, R., Smith, B., and Sergienko, O.: Simulating the processes controlling ice-shelf rift paths using damage mechanics, J. Glaciol., 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.71" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2023.71</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Jiménez and Duddu(2018)</label><mixed-citation> Jiménez, S. and Duddu, R.: On the evaluation of the stress intensity factor in calving models using linear elastic fracture mechanics, J. Glaciol., 64, 759–770, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Jiménez et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Jiménez, S., Duddu, R., and Bassis, J.: An updated-Lagrangian damage mechanics formulation for modeling the creeping flow and fracture of ice sheets, Comput. Methods Appl. M., 313, 406–432, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>King and Jarvis(2007)</label><mixed-citation>King, E. C. and Jarvis, E. P.: Use of Shear Waves to Measure Poisson's Ratio in Polar Firn, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 12, 15–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG12.1.15" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/JEEG12.1.15</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Krug et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Krug, J., Weiss, J., Gagliardini, O., and Durand, G.: Combining damage and fracture mechanics to model calving, The Cryosphere, 8, 2101–2117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2101-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-2101-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Lai et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation> Lai, C. Y., Kingslake, J., Wearing, M. G., Chen, P. H. C., Gentine, P., Li, H., Spergel, J. J., and van Wessem, J. M.: Vulnerability of Antarctica's ice shelves to meltwater-driven fracture, Nature, 584, 574–578, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>MacAyeal(1989)</label><mixed-citation>MacAyeal, D.: Large-scale ice flow over a viscous basal sediment:Theory and application to Ice Stream-B, Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 4071–4087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB04p04071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB094iB04p04071</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Mottram and Benn(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Mottram, R. H. and Benn, D. I.: Testing crevasse-depth models: A field study at breidõamerkurjö kull, iceland, J. Glaciol., 55, 746–752, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Nye(1957)</label><mixed-citation> Nye, J. F.: The distribution of stress and velocity in glaciers and ice-sheets, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 239, 113–133, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Oraschewski and Grinsted(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Oraschewski, F. M. and Grinsted, A.: Modeling enhanced firn densification due to strain softening, The Cryosphere, 16, 2683–2700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2683-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-16-2683-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Paterson(1994)</label><mixed-citation> Paterson, W.: The physics of glaciers, Elsevier, Oxford, 3rd edn., ISBN 9780750647427, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Poinar et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Poinar, K., Joughin, I., Lilien, D., Brucker, L., Kehrl, L., and Nowicki, S.: Drainage of Southeast Greenland Firn Aquifer Water through Crevasses to the Bed, Front. Earth Sci., 5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2017.00005</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Pralong and Funk(2005)</label><mixed-citation> Pralong, A. and Funk, M.: Dynamic damage model of crevasse opening and application to glacier calving, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 110, 1–12, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Rignot et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Rignot, E., Jacobs, S., Mouginot, J., and Scheuchl, B.: Ice-shelf melting around antarctica, Science, 341, 266–270, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Rist et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Rist, M. A., Sammonds, P. R., Murrell, S. A., Meredith, P. G., Oerter, H., and Doake, C. S.: Experimental fracture and mechanical properties of Antarctic ice: Preliminary results, Ann. Glaciol., 23, 284–292, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500013550" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S0260305500013550</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Rist et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation> Rist, M. A., Sammonds, P. R., Oerter, H., and Doake, C. S. M.: Fracture of Antarctic shelf ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 107, 1–2, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Scambos et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Scambos, T., Fricker, H. A., Liu, C. C., Bohlander, J., Fastook, J., Sargent, A., Massom, R., and Wu, A. M.: Ice shelf disintegration by plate bending and hydro-fracture: Satellite observations and model results of the 2008 Wilkins ice shelf break-ups, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 280, 51–60, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Schlegel et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Schlegel, R., Diez, A., Lowe, A., Mayer, H., Lambrecht, C., Freitag, A., Miller, H., Hofstede, C., and Eisen, O.: Comparison of elastic moduli from seismic diving-wave and ice-core microstructure analysis in Antarctic polar firn, Ann. Glaciol., 60, 220–230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.10" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2019.10</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Selmes et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Selmes, N., Murray, T., and James, D.: Fast draining lakes on the Greenland Ice Sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047872" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047872</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Siegert et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation> Siegert, M., Alley, R. B., Rignot, E., Englander, J., and Corell, R.: Twenty-first century sea-level rise could exceed IPCC projections for strong-warming futures, One Earth, 3, 691–703, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Smith(1965)</label><mixed-citation> Smith, J. L.: The elastic constants, strength and density of Greenland snow as determined from measurements of sonic wave velocity, Tech. rep., US Army Cold Regions Research &amp; Engineering Laboratory, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Sun et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Sun, S., Cornford, S. L., Moore, J. C., Gladstone, R., and Zhao, L.: Ice shelf fracture parameterization in an ice sheet model, The Cryosphere, 11, 2543–2554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2543-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-11-2543-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Sun et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Sun, X., Duddu, R., and Hirshikesh: A poro-damage phase field model for hydrofracturing of glacier crevasses, Extreme Mechanics Letters, 45, 101277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2021.101277" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.eml.2021.101277</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Tada et al.(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Tada, H., Paris, P. C., and Irwin, G. R.: The stress analysis of cracks handbook, 1973, Del Research Corporation, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.801535" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1115/1.801535</ext-link>, 1985. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>van den Broeke(2008)</label><mixed-citation> van den Broeke, M.: Depth and Density of the Antarctic Firn Layer, Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 40, 432–438, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>van der Veen(1998a)</label><mixed-citation> van der Veen, C. J.: Fracture mechanics approach to penetration of surface crevasses on glaciers, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 27, 31–47, 1998a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>van der Veen(1998b)</label><mixed-citation> van der Veen, C. J.: Fracture mechanics approach to penetration of bottom crevasses on glaciers, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 27, 213–223, 1998b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Veldhuijsen et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Veldhuijsen, S. B. M., van de Berg, W. J., Brils, M., Kuipers Munneke, P., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Characteristics of the 1979–2020 Antarctic firn layer simulated with IMAU-FDM v1.2A, The Cryosphere, 17, 1675–1696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1675-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-17-1675-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Wakahama et al.(1976)</label><mixed-citation> Wakahama, G., Kuroiwa, D., and Hasemi, T.: Field observations and experimental and theoretical studies on the superimposed ice of McCall Glacier, Alaska, J. Glaciol., 16, 135–149, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Weertman(1957)</label><mixed-citation> Weertman, J.: Deformation of Floating Ice Shelves, J. Glaciol., 3, 38–42, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Weertman(1973)</label><mixed-citation> Weertman, J.: Can a Water-Filled Crevasse Reach the Bottom Surface of a Glacier?, IASH Publication, 95, 139–145, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Weertman(1974)</label><mixed-citation>Weertman, J.: Depth of water-filled crevasses that are closely spaced, J. Glaciol., 13, 544, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000023297" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S0022143000023297</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Yu et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Yu, H., Rignot, E., Morlighem, M., and Seroussi, H.: Iceberg calving of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica: full-Stokes modeling combined with linear elastic fracture mechanics, The Cryosphere, 11, 1283–1296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1283-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-11-1283-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Zarrinderakht et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Zarrinderakht, M., Schoof, C., and Peirce, A.: The effect of hydrology and crevasse wall contact on calving, The Cryosphere, 16, 4491–4512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4491-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-16-4491-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Zarrinderakht et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Zarrinderakht, M., Schoof, C., and Peirce, A.: An analysis of the interaction between surface and basal crevasses in ice shelves, The Cryosphere, 18, 3841–3856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3841-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-18-3841-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The influence of firn layer material properties on surface crevasse propagation in glaciers and ice shelves</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Amory et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Amory, C., Buizert, C., Buzzard, S., Case, E., Clerx, N., Culberg, R., Datta, R. T., Dey, R., Drews, R., Dunmire, D., Eayrs, C., Hansen, N., Humbert, A., Kaitheri, A., Keegan, K., Kuipers Munneke, P., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lhermitte, S., Mair, D., McDowell, I., Mejia, J., Meyer, C. R., Morris, E., Moser, D., Oraschewski, F. M., Pearce, E., de Roda Husman, S., Schlegel, N.-J., Schultz, T., Simonsen, S. B., Stevens, C. M., Thomas, E. R., Thompson-Munson, M., Wever, N., Wouters, B., and The Firn Symposium team: Firn on Ice Sheets, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 5, 79–99, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Ashby et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ashby, M., Evans, A., Fleck, N., Gibson, L., Hutchinson, J., and Wadley, H.: Chapter 4 – Properties of metal foams, in: Metal Foams, 40–54, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, ISBN 978-0-7506-7219-1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7219-1.X5000-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7219-1.X5000-4</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bassis and Walker(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bassis, J. N. and Walker, C. C.: Upper and lower limits on the stability of calving glaciers from the yield strength envelope of ice, P. Roy. Soc. A, 468, 913–931, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Benn and Evans(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Benn, D. I. and Evans, D. J.: Glaciers &amp; glaciation, Taylor &amp; Francis Group, 2nd edn., ISBN 978-0340905791,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203785010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203785010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Benn et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Benn, D. I., Warren, C. R., and Mottram, R. H.: Calving processes and the dynamics of calving glaciers, Earth-Sci. Rev., 82, 143–179, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Buck(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buck, W. R.: The role of fresh water in driving ice shelf crevassing, rifting and calving, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 624, 118444, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118444" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118444</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Buck and Lai(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buck, W. R. and Lai, C.-Y.: Flexural Control of Basal Crevasse Opening Under Ice Shelves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093110</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Buzzard et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buzzard, S. C., Feltham, D. L., and Flocco, D.: A Mathematical Model of Melt Lake Development on an Ice Shelf, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 262–283, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001155" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001155</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Chudley et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chudley, T. R., Howat, I. M., Yadav, B., and Noh, M.-J.: Empirical correction of systematic orthorectification error in Sentinel-2 velocity fields for Greenlandic outlet glaciers, The Cryosphere, 16, 2629–2642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2629-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2629-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Clayton and Hageman(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clayton, T. and Hageman, T.: LEFM_Firn_Inclusions (v1.0), Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13911830" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13911830</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Clayton et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clayton, T., Duddu, R., Siegert, M., and Martínez-Pañeda, E.: A stress-based poro-damage phase field model for hydrofracturing of creeping glaciers and ice shelves, Eng. Fract. Mech., 272, 108693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108693" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108693</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Colgan et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Colgan, W., Rajaram, H., Abdalati, W., McCutchan, C., Mottran, R., Moussavi, M., and Grigsby, S.: Glacier crevasses: Observations, models, and mass balance implications, Rev. Geophys., 54, 119–161, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Duddu and Waisman(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duddu, R. and Waisman, H.: A temperature dependent creep damage model for polycrystalline ice, Mech. Mater., 46, 23–41, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Duddu et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duddu, R., Bassis, J., and Waisman, H.: A numerical investigation of surface crevasse propagation in glaciers using nonlocal continuum damage mechanics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3064–3068, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Duddu et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duddu, R., Jiménez, S., and Bassis, J.: A non-local continuum poro-damage mechanics model for hydrofracturing of surface crevasses in grounded glaciers, J. Glaciol., 66, 415–429, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Enderlin and Bartholomaus(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Enderlin, E. M. and Bartholomaus, T. C.: Sharp contrasts in observed and modeled crevasse patterns at Greenland's marine terminating glaciers, The Cryosphere, 14, 4121–4133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4121-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4121-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Fischer et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fischer, M. P., Alley, R. B., and Engelder, T.: Fracture toughness of ice and firn determined from the modified ring test, J. Glaciol., 41, 383–394, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Frederikse et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frederikse, T., Landerer, F., Caron, L., Adhikari, S., Parkes, D., Humphrey, V. W., Dangendorf, S., Hogarth, P., Zanna, L., Cheng, L., and Wu, Y. H.: The causes of sea-level rise since 1900, Nature, 584, 393–397, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Gao et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gao, Y., Ghosh, G., Jiménez, S., and Duddu, R.: A finite-element-based cohesive zone model of water-filled surface crevasse propagation in floating ice tongues, Comput. Sci. Eng., 25, 8–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2023.3315661" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2023.3315661</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Glen(1955)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Glen, J. W.: The creep of polycrystalline ice, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 228, 519–538, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0066</a>, 1955.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Greve and Blatter(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Greve, R. and Blatter, H.: Dynamics of ice sheets and glaciers, Springer Science &amp; Business Media, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03415-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03415-2</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Huth et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huth, A., Duddu, R., and Smith, B.: A Generalized Interpolation Material Point Method for Shallow Ice Shelves. 2: Anisotropic Nonlocal Damage Mechanics and Rift Propagation, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002292, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002292" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002292</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Huth et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huth, A., Duddu, R., Smith, B., and Sergienko, O.: Simulating the processes controlling ice-shelf rift paths using damage mechanics, J. Glaciol., 1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.71" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.71</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Jiménez and Duddu(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiménez, S. and Duddu, R.: On the evaluation of the stress intensity factor in calving models using linear elastic fracture mechanics, J. Glaciol., 64, 759–770, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Jiménez et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiménez, S., Duddu, R., and Bassis, J.: An updated-Lagrangian damage mechanics formulation for modeling the creeping flow and fracture of ice sheets, Comput. Methods Appl. M., 313, 406–432, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>King and Jarvis(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
King, E. C. and Jarvis, E. P.: Use of Shear Waves to Measure Poisson's Ratio in Polar Firn, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 12, 15–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG12.1.15" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG12.1.15</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Krug et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krug, J., Weiss, J., Gagliardini, O., and Durand, G.: Combining damage and fracture mechanics to model calving, The Cryosphere, 8, 2101–2117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2101-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2101-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Lai et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lai, C. Y., Kingslake, J., Wearing, M. G., Chen, P. H. C., Gentine, P., Li, H., Spergel, J. J., and van Wessem, J. M.: Vulnerability of Antarctica's ice shelves to meltwater-driven fracture, Nature, 584, 574–578, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>MacAyeal(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
MacAyeal, D.: Large-scale ice flow over a viscous basal sediment:Theory and application to Ice Stream-B, Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 4071–4087, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB04p04071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB04p04071</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Mottram and Benn(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mottram, R. H. and Benn, D. I.: Testing crevasse-depth models: A field study at breidõamerkurjö kull, iceland, J. Glaciol., 55, 746–752, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Nye(1957)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nye, J. F.: The distribution of stress and velocity in glaciers and ice-sheets, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 239, 113–133, 1957.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Oraschewski and Grinsted(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oraschewski, F. M. and Grinsted, A.: Modeling enhanced firn densification due to strain softening, The Cryosphere, 16, 2683–2700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2683-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2683-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Paterson(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paterson, W.: The physics of glaciers, Elsevier, Oxford, 3rd edn., ISBN 9780750647427, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Poinar et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Poinar, K., Joughin, I., Lilien, D., Brucker, L., Kehrl, L., and Nowicki, S.: Drainage of Southeast Greenland Firn Aquifer Water through Crevasses to the Bed, Front. Earth Sci., 5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00005</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Pralong and Funk(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pralong, A. and Funk, M.: Dynamic damage model of crevasse opening and application to glacier calving, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 110, 1–12, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Rignot et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rignot, E., Jacobs, S., Mouginot, J., and Scheuchl, B.: Ice-shelf melting around antarctica, Science, 341, 266–270, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Rist et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rist, M. A., Sammonds, P. R., Murrell, S. A., Meredith, P. G., Oerter, H., and Doake, C. S.: Experimental fracture and mechanical properties of Antarctic ice: Preliminary results, Ann. Glaciol., 23, 284–292, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500013550" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500013550</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Rist et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rist, M. A., Sammonds, P. R., Oerter, H., and Doake, C. S. M.: Fracture of Antarctic shelf ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 107, 1–2, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Scambos et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scambos, T., Fricker, H. A., Liu, C. C., Bohlander, J., Fastook, J., Sargent, A., Massom, R., and Wu, A. M.: Ice shelf disintegration by plate bending and hydro-fracture: Satellite observations and model results of the 2008 Wilkins ice shelf break-ups, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 280, 51–60, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Schlegel et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schlegel, R., Diez, A., Lowe, A., Mayer, H., Lambrecht, C., Freitag, A., Miller, H., Hofstede, C., and Eisen, O.: Comparison of elastic moduli from seismic diving-wave and ice-core microstructure analysis in Antarctic polar firn, Ann. Glaciol., 60, 220–230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.10" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2019.10</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Selmes et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Selmes, N., Murray, T., and James, D.: Fast draining lakes on the Greenland Ice Sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047872" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047872</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Siegert et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Siegert, M., Alley, R. B., Rignot, E., Englander, J., and Corell, R.: Twenty-first century sea-level rise could exceed IPCC projections for strong-warming futures, One Earth, 3, 691–703, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Smith(1965)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith, J. L.: The elastic constants, strength and density of Greenland snow as determined from measurements of sonic wave velocity, Tech. rep., US Army Cold Regions Research &amp; Engineering Laboratory, 1965.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Sun et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, S., Cornford, S. L., Moore, J. C., Gladstone, R., and Zhao, L.: Ice shelf fracture parameterization in an ice sheet model, The Cryosphere, 11, 2543–2554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2543-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2543-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Sun et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, X., Duddu, R., and Hirshikesh: A poro-damage phase field model for hydrofracturing of glacier crevasses, Extreme Mechanics Letters, 45, 101277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2021.101277" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2021.101277</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Tada et al.(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tada, H., Paris, P. C., and Irwin, G. R.: The stress analysis of cracks handbook, 1973, Del Research Corporation, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.801535" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1115/1.801535</a>, 1985.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>van den Broeke(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
van den Broeke, M.: Depth and Density of the Antarctic Firn Layer, Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 40, 432–438, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>van der Veen(1998a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
van der Veen, C. J.: Fracture mechanics approach to penetration of surface crevasses on glaciers, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 27, 31–47, 1998a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>van der Veen(1998b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
van der Veen, C. J.: Fracture mechanics approach to penetration of bottom crevasses on glaciers, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 27, 213–223, 1998b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Veldhuijsen et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Veldhuijsen, S. B. M., van de Berg, W. J., Brils, M., Kuipers Munneke, P., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Characteristics of the 1979–2020 Antarctic firn layer simulated with IMAU-FDM v1.2A, The Cryosphere, 17, 1675–1696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1675-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1675-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Wakahama et al.(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wakahama, G., Kuroiwa, D., and Hasemi, T.: Field observations and experimental and theoretical studies on the superimposed ice of McCall Glacier, Alaska, J. Glaciol., 16, 135–149, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Weertman(1957)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weertman, J.: Deformation of Floating Ice Shelves, J. Glaciol., 3, 38–42, 1957.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Weertman(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weertman, J.: Can a Water-Filled Crevasse Reach the Bottom Surface of a Glacier?, IASH Publication, 95, 139–145, 1973.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Weertman(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weertman, J.: Depth of water-filled crevasses that are closely spaced, J. Glaciol., 13, 544, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000023297" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000023297</a>, 1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Yu et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, H., Rignot, E., Morlighem, M., and Seroussi, H.: Iceberg calving of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica: full-Stokes modeling combined with linear elastic fracture mechanics, The Cryosphere, 11, 1283–1296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1283-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1283-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Zarrinderakht et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zarrinderakht, M., Schoof, C., and Peirce, A.: The effect of hydrology and crevasse wall contact on calving, The Cryosphere, 16, 4491–4512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4491-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4491-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Zarrinderakht et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zarrinderakht, M., Schoof, C., and Peirce, A.: An analysis of the interaction between surface and basal crevasses in ice shelves, The Cryosphere, 18, 3841–3856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3841-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3841-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
