<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-17-427-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Megadunes in Antarctica: migration and characterization <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>from remote and in
situ observations</article-title><alt-title>Megadunes in Antarctica</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Megadunes in Antarctica}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{G. Traversa et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Traversa</surname><given-names>Giacomo</given-names></name>
          <email>giacomo.traversa@isp.cnr.it</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Fugazza</surname><given-names>Davide</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4523-9085</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Frezzotti</surname><given-names>Massimo</given-names></name>
          <email>massimo.frezzotti@uniroma3.it</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-2883</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Polar Sciences, National Research Council of Italy,
20125 Milan, Italy
</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Physical Sciences, Earth and Environment (DSFTA),
Università degli Studi di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Environmental Science and Policy (ESP),
Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Science, Università degli Studi Roma Tre, 00146
Rome, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Giacomo Traversa (giacomo.traversa@isp.cnr.it) and Massimo
Frezzotti (massimo.frezzotti@uniroma3.it)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>February</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>427</fpage><lpage>444</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>14</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>December</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Giacomo Traversa et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/427/2023/tc-17-427-2023.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/427/2023/tc-17-427-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/427/2023/tc-17-427-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/427/2023/tc-17-427-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e123">Megadunes are peculiar features formed by the interaction between
the atmosphere and cryosphere and are known to be present only on the East
Antarctic Plateau and other planets (Mars and Pluto). In this study, we have
analysed the glaciological dynamic of megadunes, their spectral properties
and morphology on two sample areas of the East Antarctic Plateau where in
the past international field activities were carried out (EAIIST, East Antarctic International Ice Sheet Traverse;
It-ITASE, Italian International Trans-Antarctic Scientific Expedition). Using satellite images spanning 7 years, we analysed the spatial
and temporal variability in megadune surface characteristics, i.e. near-infrared (NIR) albedo, thermal brightness temperature (BT) and slope along
the prevailing wind direction (SPWD), useful for mapping them. These
parameters allowed us to characterize and perform an automated detection of
the glazed surfaces, and we determined the influence of the SPWD by
evaluating different combinations of these parameters. The inclusion of the
SPWD significantly increased the accuracy of the method, doubling it in
certain analysed scenes. Using remote and field observations, for the first
time we surveyed all the components of upwind migration (absolute,
sedimentological and ice flow), finding an absolute value of about 10 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The analysis shows that the migration is driven by the snow
accumulation on the crest and trough prograding upwind on the previous
windward flanks characterized by glazed surface. Our results present
significant implications for the surface mass balance estimation, paleo-climate
reconstruction using ice cores, and the measurements using optical and
radar images/data in the megadune areas.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e147">Antarctic climate and mass balance have been highlighted by the Special
Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (Meredith et al.,
2019) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) among the main
uncertainties for the climate system and sea level projections. Surface mass
balance (SMB) is the net balance between the processes of snow precipitation
and loss on a glacier surface and provides mass input to the surface of the
Antarctic Ice Sheet. Therefore, it represents an important control on the ice
sheet surface mass balance and resulting contribution to global sea level change.
Ice sheet SMB varies greatly across multiple scales of time (hourly to
decadal) and space (metres to hundreds of kilometres), and it is notoriously
challenging to observe and represent in atmospheric models (e.g. Agosta et
al., 2019; Lenaerts et al., 2019). Moreover, given the difficulties in
accessing the interior of the ice sheet, only limited field observation on
past and current conditions exists. The southern part of the East Antarctic
ice divide, from Concordia and Vostok stations to the South Pole, is the
coldest and driest area on Earth and presents unique features called
megadunes, which extend for more than 500 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fahnestock et al.,
2000). The drivers of megadune formation are uncommon snow accumulation and
redistribution processes driven by wind scouring that remain relatively
unexplained (Fahnestock et al., 2000; Frezzotti et al., 2002a, b; Courville
et al., 2007; Scambos et al., 2012; Dadic et al., 2013; Ekaykin et al.,
2015). Ground surveys of megadunes show that snow is removed from
their leeward slopes where a specific erosional type of snow, “glazed
surface” or “wind crust”, is formed as a result. In contrast, snow
accumulation is increased on the windward slopes that are characterized by
the depositional types of the snow microrelief termed “sastrugi”. Glazed
surfaces form because wind and sublimation can ablate much more snow/firn
than is accumulated by annual solid precipitation, causing a persistent SMB
close to zero or which is negative. The stability of climatic conditions could play a
key role in megadune formation, since snow precipitation is very low, while
katabatic wind intensity and direction are stable; these conditions affect
snow sintering and a high grade of snow metamorphism (Albert et al., 2004;
Courville et al., 2007; Scambos et al., 2012; Dadic et al., 2013). Megadunes
are oriented perpendicular to the slope along the prevailing wind direction
(SPWD); wave amplitudes are small (up to 8 m); wavelengths range from 2 to
over 5 km; and megadune crests are nearly parallel, extending from tens to
hundreds of kilometres (Swithinbank et al., 1988; Fahnestock et al., 2000;
Frezzotti et al., 2002a, b; Arcone et al., 2012a, b). The angle between the
katabatic wind direction and the direction of general surface slope at a
regional scale can differ up to 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the interaction between
the topographic slope driving gravity and the Coriolis force (Fahnestock et
al., 2000; Frezzotti et al., 2002b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e170">Location map of megadune area. <bold>(a)</bold> Satellite image map of the
Antarctic continent (Jezek, 1999) with elevation contour lines at 1000 m a.s.l. intervals; megadune regions are shown as cross-hatched white areas
(Fahnestock et al., 2000), with snow precipitation by RACMO (Regional Atmospheric Climate Model) in colour for
areas with precipitation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Van Wessem et
al., 2014) (black rectangle, <bold>b</bold>). <bold>(b)</bold> The megadune field with two study
sites, EAIIST (red rectangle, <bold>c</bold>) and It-ITASE (green rectangle, <bold>d</bold>).
<bold>(c)</bold> Landsat 8 OLI (Operational Land Imager) image in false colour (scene 069119 on 17 December 2015) of the
EAIIST area. <bold>(d)</bold> Landsat 8 OLI image in false colour (scene 081114 on 18 December 2014)
of the It-ITASE area and D6 core site; the green rectangle shows the
location of Fig. 4. In panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>, red arrows represent ERA5 wind
direction and green arrows represent sastrugi-based wind direction, while the yellow
lines show the location of the transects studied.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/427/2023/tc-17-427-2023-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e236">Based on previous studies, the SMB of megadunes ranges between 25 %
(leeward faces, glazed surfaces) and 120 % (windward faces, covered by huge
sastrugi up to 1.5 m in height) of accumulation in adjacent non-megadune
areas (Frezzotti et al., 2002b). The sedimentary structure of buried
megadunes examined via ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and the Global Positioning
System (GPS) suggests that the sedimentary morphology of the windward face
(sastrugi) migrates upwind with time, burying the glazed surface of the
leeward face (Frezzotti et al., 2002b; Ekaykin et al., 2015), with typical
“antidune” processes similar to those observed on fluvial and ocean
bedforms (Prothero and Schwab, 2004). This uphill migration is caused by the
difference in accumulation between windward (high-accumulation) and leeward
(near-zero or negative-accumulation) sides, also leading to differences in
snow features and surface roughness (Fahnestock et al., 2000; Frezzotti et
al., 2002a; Albert et al., 2004; Courville et al., 2007). Megadunes appear
to be formed by an oscillation in the katabatic airflow, leading to a
wave-like variation in net accumulation; the wind waves are formed at the
change in SPWD, in response to the buoyancy force, favouring the
standing-wave mechanism (Fahnestock et al., 2000; Frezzotti et al., 2002b).
Dadic et al. (2013) based their analysis on the surficial-flow theory for
sediments in water (Núñez-González and Martín-Vide, 2011),
and atmospheric-flow modelling, persistent katabatic winds, strong
atmospheric stability and spatial variability in surface roughness are the
primary controllers of upwind accumulation and migration of megadunes, where
the latter represents the main factor that influences their velocity.</p>
      <p id="d1e240">The surface waveforms of megadunes with regular bands of sastrugi and glazed
surfaces allow for surveying the megadunes by satellite observations because of
differences in albedo and microwave backscatter (Fahnestock et al., 2000;
Frezzotti et al., 2002a; Scambos et al., 2012) between these features and
surrounding snow. Spectral differences also lead to an effect on
temperature, which is on average higher over glazed surfaces than on the
snow surface (Fujii et al., 1987). In spite of the importance of the glazed
surfaces of megadunes for the SMB of Antarctica, a remote sensing
characterization of their physical properties and spatial distribution and
a quantitative analysis of their migration are currently lacking. The aim of
the study is to provide a detailed survey of the spatial and temporal
variability in two megadune areas using remote sensing data (Landsat 8 and
Sentinel-2), high-resolution elevation models (Reference Elevation Model of
Antarctica, REMA; Howat et al., 2019) and climatic conditions using
atmospheric reanalysis data (ERA5) in addition to past in situ measurement
data (firn core, GPR and GPS) to explore spectral, thermal and windward
slope relationships with a view towards generating an algorithm for their
automatic detection. Moreover, we provide for the first time the first
measurements of the absolute megadune movement and its different
components: ice flow and sedimentological progradation. The analysis of
absolute megadune movement has important implications on the remote sensing
ice dynamic measurements, in particular on ice-flow measurements and
elevation changes. Our work constitutes substantial progress towards the
survey of ablation areas on SMB at small spatial scales over ice sheets
using surface morphology (SPWD) and albedo detection by satellite. A clear
understanding of these interactions is of primary importance for the
climatic interpretation of ice records and for the assessment of processes
and rates of wind scouring and its SMB implications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d1e251">Megadune fields on the Antarctic continent extend along 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
latitude (75–85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, about 1100 km) and 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in longitude (110–140<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, about 300–600 km). The
climatic conditions of the area are characterized by extremely low
temperatures (mean annual temperatures from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), extremely low snow precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 mm w.e. a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, water
equivalent per year; Van Wessem et al., 2014; Agosta et al.,
2019) and nearly constant katabatic wind direction and wind speed (6–12 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Courville et al., 2007). Analysis of data acquired by the
Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO)
satellite has enabled the construction of a 12-year climatology of blowing
snow over Antarctica, showing that the greatest frequency of blowing-snow
events, approaching 75 % of observations, is seen in the megadune region
(Palm et al., 2019), which includes the study areas of the present work.</p>
      <p id="d1e345">This research focuses on two megadune areas that were crossed and surveyed
by two snow traverse expeditions: EAIIST (East Antarctic International Ice
Sheet Traverse) in 2018–2019 and It-ITASE (Italian International
Trans-Antarctic Scientific Expedition) in 1998–1999. The EAIIST area is situated
300 km east of Vostok Station (centred at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">122</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and It-ITASE area 150 km east of Concordia Station (centred at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">131</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E; Fig. 1). The survey data of the
first area (EAIIST, <uri>https://www.ige-grenoble.fr/EAIIST-project-a-scientific-raid</uri>, last access: 15 January 2023) are being processing, whereas
the in situ observations of the second traverse It-ITASE are available (Frezzotti
et al., 2002a, b, 2004, 2005; Proposito et al., 2002; Vittuari et al.,
2004). The EAIIST area is in the middle of the megadune area; thus,
megadunes are well defined and continuous on satellite images in optical and
microwave bands, whereas the It-ITASE area is at the north-eastern limit of the
megadune field, where this morphology is discontinuous and disappears, thus
representing the developing threshold of the environmental conditions
(morphology, climatology, glaciology) determining megadune formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e419">Topographically, the two study areas are in a relative sloping zone where
the altitude decreases moving from SW to NE and the elevation ranges from
2700 to 3200 m a.s.l. Thus, the topographic aspect (the direction that a
topographic slope faces) is generally east (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
It-ITASE; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, EAIIST). The regional
topographic slope (10 km scale) is on average 1.5  and 1.8 m km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the It-ITASE and EAIIST areas, respectively. The katabatic
wind direction is nearly constant with wind blowing from SW in both areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Data</title>
      <p id="d1e481">In order to study the megadune areas, we combined three main datasets
(satellite images; meteorological data from reanalysis products; digital
elevation model, DEM) to create a method for the automatic detection of
snow glazed surfaces. We tested two methods, one by creating five sample
transects in the EAIIST area (Fig. 1c) and visually identifying thresholds
of albedo, thermal brightness temperature (BT) and SPWD to discriminate
between glazed surfaces and surrounding snow. The five transects were created
in different areas of the megadune field, and they show relatively different
wind directions and topographic aspect and slope, with the aim of
representing the widest possible range of SPWD values. For the second
method, i.e. a maximum likelihood supervised classification, we created 30
polygons in the glazed-snow area and 30 for firn, which were used to train
the classification algorithm.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Satellite datasets</title>
      <p id="d1e491">Two sources of satellite imagery were used: Landsat 8 OLI (EROS Center, 2013) satellite images
(tile area: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Sentinel-2 (ESA, 2022)  images (tile area: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), both downloaded from EarthExplorer
portal (<uri>https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/</uri>, last access: 24 December 2022). Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel-2
provide data in several spectral bands, including panchromatic, visible,
very near-infrared, short-wave infrared and thermal-infrared bands, with
different spatial resolution from 10 to 100 m. Satellite images from Landsat
8 OLI (Table A1) were chosen at dates close to the first
stripe acquisitions of the REMA DEM (2013, Table A2). The megadune area is
subject to blowing-snow events (more than 75 % of the time; Palm et al.,
2019) and cloud cover. Moreover, in the morning a strong atmospheric
inversion layer develops 70 % of the time during summer on the Antarctic
Plateau (Pietroni et al., 2014) with the formation of fog, which is not
homogeneously distributed on the area surveyed by satellite images and is
difficult to detect. Therefore, we excluded from our dataset all images with
cloud cover <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % of land surface, visible blowing-snow and
fog events and images with solar zenith angle (SZA) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(because of the effect on the albedo, as demonstrated by Picard et al.,
2016) and obtained 17 images from Landsat 8 from 2013 to 2020 and 4 images
from Sentinel-2 from 2018 to 2021 (Table A1), 11 for the EAIIST site and 6
for It-ITASE. To map glazed surfaces on megadunes, we used Landsat 8 OLI
data as the method that rely on the calculation of the albedo, which have been
thoroughly validated for Landsat 8 OLI (Traversa et al., 2021a).
Additionally, Landsat 8 OLI is available for a longer period of time
compared to Sentinel-2, allowing us to investigate temporal evolution of the
megadune area. In the megadune area, the difference between snow glazed
surfaces and snow is higher considering near-infrared (NIR) spectral albedo and BT (Traversa
et al., 2021b). A “higher” amount of solar radiation absorbed by the
glazed surface also corresponds to a different BT on snow glazed surfaces
(Fujii et al., 1987; Scambos et al., 2012, and references therein). In fact,
these zones show a higher BT compared to the upwind part of the dune
characterized by the snow surface. In detail, we used the Landsat 8 OLI near-infrared band (NIR band 5, with a ground resolution of 30 m) to calculate
NIR albedo and thermal-infrared (Thermal Infrared Sensor, TIRS 1) band 10 to calculate BT (with a
ground resolution of 100 m, provided and resampled to 30 m). To perform the
megadune migration analysis (Sect. 2.2.2), we used the panchromatic band of
Landsat 8 OLI, as this band has a higher resolution (15 m) compared to the
other spectral bands of Landsat. For comparison, Sentinel-2 images were also
used, specifically NIR band 8 (10 m spatial resolution), which allows for better
observing differences between snow and glazed surfaces compared to the other
visible and infrared bands.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Atmospheric reanalysis dataset</title>
      <p id="d1e561">We extracted wind direction from the ERA5 atmospheric reanalysis global
climate dataset (Hersbach et al., 2020) and by identification of sastrugi
based on Landsat (Sect. 2.2.1). In particular, we used ERA5 hourly data (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link>, Hersbach et al., 2018) of wind speed and direction at 10 m above the surface
averaged over a 20-year temporal period, from 2000 to 2019. Beside using all
wind speed observations, we further divided wind speed into five classes, only
considering wind speed values above specific thresholds, i.e. wind speed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. These thresholds were chosen based
on the interactions between wind and snow: snow transportation by saltation
(within 0.3 m in elevation) at wind speeds between 2 and 5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, transportation by suspension (drift snow) at velocities
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (within 2 m), and blowing snow (snow
transportation higher than 2 m) at velocities between 7 and 11 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Frezzotti et al., 2004, and references therein). The
threshold wind speed at which the sublimation of blowing snow starts to
contribute substantially to katabatic flows in a feedback mechanism appears
to be 11 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kodama et al., 1985; Wendler et al., 1993).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Topographic dataset (DEM)</title>
      <p id="d1e671">In order to obtain the aspect and slope of the surface for the SPWD
calculation and perform topographic correction for the calculation of
albedo, we used a mosaic of REMA tiles (Howat et
al., 2019, 2022). These are constructed from thousands of individual stereoscopic
DEMs at high spatial resolution (8 m). Each individual DEM was vertically
registered to satellite altimetry measurements from CryoSat-2 and ICESat (Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite),
resulting in absolute uncertainties of less than 1 m and relative
uncertainties of decimetres. REMA is based mainly on imagery acquired during
the austral summer period (December–March), and at the two sites, the
temporal period is from 2008 to 2017, although 87.5 % of stripes were
acquired in 2013–2017 (Table A2).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e683">The study includes four main processing steps: Landsat 8 OLI image
processing for the calculation of NIR albedo, extraction of thermal BT from
Landsat thermal band 10, SPWD calculation from ERA5 and satellite
sastrugi-based wind direction, estimation of the surface velocity and
migration of megadunes using feature tracking (2014–2021), and comparison of
GPR–GPS measurements from 1999 with the REMA DEM from 2014 (specific strip
on the area). The first three steps were the basis of the automatic
detection of the glazed-snow areas.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Automatic detection of snow glazed surfaces</title>
      <p id="d1e693">By using spectral datasets and topographic data, we consider for the
automatic detection of the glazed areas the following parameters: NIR
albedo, thermal BT and SPWD. NIR albedo (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was here estimated
using Landsat 8 OLI imagery, following the method first proposed by Klok et
al. (2003) and recently tested and validated in Antarctica by Traversa et
al. (2021a). We used NIR albedo as opposed to broadband albedo owing to the
higher detection ability of NIR albedo, which stems from the fact that
broadband albedo obtained by using the Liang conversion algorithm (Liang, 2001)
considers the visible area of the spectrum and the short-wave infrared. In
fact, in broadband albedo it is hardly possible to recognize the differences
between glazed and unglazed areas, which in the visible wavelengths look
very similar (Warren, 1982).</p>
      <p id="d1e703">Following the methodology proposed by Traversa et al. (2021a) and Traversa and Fugazza (2021), the images
were processed through three main steps: (1) conversion of radiance to top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance by using per-pixel values of the SZA available
through the Landsat solar zenith band. This conversion allows for applying a
more accurate per-pixel correction for the SZA, useful in our study
considering the average high SZA (always <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table A1)
and its strong effect on albedo (Pirazzini, 2004; Picard et al., 2016;
Traversa et al., 2019). Also included are (2) atmospheric correction and (3) topographic
correction.</p>
      <p id="d1e722">To retrieve the thermal BT, we employed band 10 of Landsat 8. To estimate
the TOA thermal BT received at the satellite, spectral radiance in the
thermal band was converted using the thermal constants in the Landsat
metadata (Zanter, 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e725">For the SPWD, the wind directions were extracted at low spatial resolution
(30 km) using ERA5 and validated by identifying sastrugi and deriving wind
directions from them using Landsat 8 OLI at 30 m spatial resolution (Mather,
1962; Parish and Bromwich, 1991). The identification of sastrugi was
performed on the Landsat 8 OLI NIR band (band 5) by applying the Canny edge
detection algorithm (i.edge in GRASS GIS, Geographic Resources Analysis Support System geographic information system; Canny, 1986). Prior to edge detection,
each image was pre-processed by using a high-pass filter with a length scale
of 150 m implemented through a fast Fourier transform to highlight the
sastrugi. This process was applied on seven Landsat scenes from the spring and
summer months, i.e. November, December and January of the period 2013–2020.</p>
      <p id="d1e729">To further estimate the SPWD based on the wind direction from ERA5 and
Landsat-derived sastrugi, we used the approach of Scambos et al. (2012);
i.e. we calculated the dot product between the slope derived from the REMA
DEM and the wind direction. The algorithm was applied to ERA5 and
sastrugi-based wind directions resampled at 120 m spatial resolution, and
the REMA DEM was resampled to match ERA5 and sastrugi-based wind directions
using bilinear interpolation. The resulting SPWD has units of metres per kilometre.</p>
      <p id="d1e732">Due to the small difference in NIR albedo and BT of glazed surfaces
(leeward) and sastrugi (windward) and the different illumination and
meteorological conditions of the satellite images, the analysis of the
variability in SPWD, NIR albedo and BT was conducted in detail on the five
transects perpendicular to megadunes. The comparisons were conducted using
the albedo and temperature values and normalized using mean and standard
deviation for each transect. Moreover, we determined the strength of the
relationship between SPWD and NIR albedo and between SPWD and thermal BT (applied on
the moving averages of 11 pixels weighted based on the distance from the
central point) using linear regression. The comparison analysis was
conducted at seasonal scale for the 2013–2014 (4 images) and at multi-annual
scale on 17 images distributed over 8 years.</p>
      <p id="d1e735">With the aim of providing an automatic methodology for distinguishing the
glazed snow from the surrounding firn surface and evaluating the role of SPWD
in the classification, we applied and compared two different approaches: a
supervised classification (maximum likelihood) and a self-defined-threshold
approach. In both cases, we considered SPWD, NIR albedo and thermal BT. The
analysed images were the one from 17 December 2015, which was one of the best
available images in terms of cloud cover (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 %), presenting
no blowing snow/fog and the lowest SZA (67<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the EAIIST site
and the closest date to the REMA DEM in the area (January–October 2016), and
the four scenes available for the 2013–2014 season (i.e. 25 November 2013,
11 December 2013, 27 December 2013 and 28 January 2014). For the self-defined-threshold
method, we applied a conditional evaluation (i.e. output result for each
pixel based on whether the pixel value is assessed as true or false in a set
conditional statement) to automatically map glazed snow. The thresholds were
visually identified and iteratively adjusted to obtain a best fit as
follows: SPWD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 m km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the aim of considering the
leeward flanks only, NIR albedo <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.82 and thermal BT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 246.5 K. In order to evaluate the role of each parameter, with
particular attention to the SPWD, we repeated the two approaches by using
individual parameters (NIR, SPWD, BT) and combinations of them (i.e. NIR–SPWD, NIR–BT, BT–SPWD and NIR–BT–SPWD). Finally, we calculated the
accuracy for each case, by creating a set of random points (100 points,
following the density used in  Azzoni
et al., 2016) as ground truth (visually assigned on the false-colour image)
and comparing the results through a confusion matrix. The accuracy was
calculated not only for methodologies in their entireness (identifying and
distinguishing glazed snow and the surrounding firn surface) but also with
respect to their specific ability in detecting glazed snow.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Megadune movement estimation</title>
      <p id="d1e796">Frezzotti et al. (2002b) and Ekaykin et al. (2015), based on the sedimentary
structure of buried megadunes (using GPR and GPS), pointed out that the
megadune migration and ice sheet surface flow show a similar intensity but
opposite directions and that megadunes migrate upwind with time, burying
the glazed surface of the leeward face.</p>
      <p id="d1e799">Here, by using different satellite images and field data, we are able to
provide and quantify megadune migration components: ice-flow (If) direction,
which is correlated mainly to topographic slope; sedimentological migration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), caused by sedimentological processes linked to deposition (on the
upstream dune flank); ablation (on the downstream dune flank) of snow;
and the result of these processes, the absolute migration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">If</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            During the It-ITASE traverse at the D6 site, megadunes were surveyed by
means of GPR–GPS to measure ice velocity, surface elevation, and internal
layering of present and buried megadunes. We compared these measurements
with the REMA DEM derived by satellite images acquired in 2014 to estimate
the change in surface morphology due to sedimentological migration of the
megadunes. With the aim of calculating the surface velocity and direction of
megadune movement, the feature-tracking module IMCORR (Scambos et al., 1992) was run in the System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA GIS). This algorithm performs image
correlation based on two images providing the displacement of each pixel
between the second and first image (Jawak et al., 2018). Prior to feature
tracking, each image pair was pre-processed by using a low-pass filter with
a length scale of 150 m implemented through a fast Fourier transform to
smooth out the sastrugi and leave megadune features for tracking. Finally,
by dividing the displacement values obtained through IMCORR by the
corresponding time period, we obtained the absolute migration of the
megadunes in metres per year. For comparison, we also employed another method to
evaluate the megadune migration. By using Landsat 8 OLI imagery, similarly
to what was already done for the detection of sastrugi and applying an edge
detection on band 5 (NIR), it is possible to identify the megadune crest and
trough at the edges between leeward (glazed snow) and windward (sastrugi)
zones. The obtained direction raster was manually cleaned from errors and
artefacts (angles: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
intensity: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and then vectorized after thinning, i.e. reducing the number of cells used to represent the width of the features to
1 pixel. Comparing the obtained velocity fields in different years, we could
observe the absolute migration of the megadunes.</p>
      <p id="d1e891">We considered the widest temporal interval between two pairs of cloud-free
images of Landsat 8 (four pairs) and Sentinel-2 (two pairs), which were in a
similar period of the year, to avoid relevant differences in the SZA that
could confound the feature-tracking algorithm (Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e898">Results of the absolute migration of megadunes calculated from
IMCORR based on Landsat 8 OLI (L8), with a tile area of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Sentinel-2 (S2), with a tile area of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Imagery at the It-ITASE and EAIIST sites.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zone</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Satellite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> span</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Features</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(a)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">It-ITASE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">L8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 Dec 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 Nov 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30 073</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">It-ITASE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">L8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 Dec 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 Dec 2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30 538</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">It-ITASE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13 Dec 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27 Dec 2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">537 304</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EAIIST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">L8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27 Dec 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28 Dec 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">316 951</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EAIIST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">L8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 Dec 2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">139 622</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EAIIST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 Jan 2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 Jan 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1 329 648</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1249">The results from IMCORR and GPS observations were compared with the
MEaSUREs (Making Earth System Data Records for Use in Research Environments) ice-flow velocity product (Rignot et al., 2017), which provides the highest-resolution (450 m)
digital mosaic of ice motion in Antarctica (assembled from multiple
satellite interferometric synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) systems, mostly between
2007–2009 and 2013–2016), showing for each pixel the direction and the
velocity of ice flow with a mean error of 3 %–4 %.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Megadune characterization and automatic detection</title>
      <p id="d1e1269">On average, in the five analysed transects NIR albedo ranges from 0.81 to
0.86 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the upwind area (snow sastrugi) and from 0.73 to 0.81
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) downwind (glazed surfaces), with differences inside the
transects of about 0.07 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a maximum value of 0.1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The maximum contrast of NIR albedo between glazed surfaces and snow sastrugi
usually occurs at springtime (October–November) and decreases during the
summer season (Fig. 2). Our remote sensing observations agree with previous
analysis that pointed out that in late summer, radiative cooling of the
uppermost surface layer leads to formation of surface frost, by
condensation of local atmospheric vapour onto the snow surface; this gives
the glazed surface a more diffuse specular reflection than in spring and
changes its appearance in albedo and BT (Scambos et al., 2012, and references
therein). Along the transects, the correlation of NIR albedo from the
different images is high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: up to 0.99) during the spring season
(24 November 2013, 27 December 2013) and decreases by the end of the summer and in
comparison with the following years, with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.7 only after 2 years (17 December 2015) and up to 0.6 after 6 years (December 2019). A similar
decrease in correlation occurs from the comparison of the SPWD and NIR
albedo from 2013 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.66) to 2019 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.39).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1347">Moving averages (based on 11 transect pixels) of <bold>(a)</bold> NIR albedo
and <bold>(c)</bold> thermal BT TIRS1 between November 2013 and February 2014 for
transect C at the EAIIST site (see Fig. 1c for location) and elevation from
the REMA DEM. Corresponding normalized moving averages of <bold>(b)</bold> NIR albedo and
<bold>(d)</bold> thermal BT TIRS1 during the austral summer season 2013–2014 for transect
C and elevation from the REMA DEM (detrended topography).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/427/2023/tc-17-427-2023-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1368">For the thermal BT, we observed an intra-seasonal trend on all transects: in
fact, while thermal BT remains <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 244 K during the middle of the summer
(11 and 27 December 2013), it decreases moving away from the summer
solstice. Temperatures range between 238  and 240.5 K on 25 November 2013, 26 d from the solstice. The difference increases on the date farthest from
the solstice, 28 January 2014 (38 d from the solstice), with the lowest
values ranging between 236 and 239 K. The BT varies up to 1.5 K for each
transect but up to 3–4 K within individual images. Intra-annually, the
difference between glazed surfaces and snow is higher during the spring (max 1 K in November) and tends to decrease over time, becoming lower than 0.5 K
at the end of summer (January), where differences between the two surfaces
are hardly detectable and the correlation between the two parameters
frequently decreases drastically. These differences are directly correlated
to the ones observed in NIR albedo, as a higher quantity of energy is
absorbed on glazed surfaces.</p>
      <p id="d1e1379">High correlations are found between NIR albedo and thermal BT with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of up to 0.67 (95 % confidence interval) and between SPWD vs. NIR albedo
and thermal BT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.44 and 0.57 at 95 % confidence interval,
respectively) calculated along all the transects (Fig. 3). The comparison
between thermal BT and SPWD shows the same pattern observed for the NIR
albedo but is proportionally inverse with respect to SPWD (Fig. 3), with
higher temperatures corresponding to the glazed part of downwind areas of
the dunes and conversely, lower values related to snow sastrugi in the
upwind zones.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1410">Diagram plots of transects at the EAIIST site from a Landsat 8
image acquired on 25 November 2013: <bold>(a)</bold> SPWD (slope along the prevailing wind
direction) compared within each transect (C, LL, LR, UL, UR; Fig. 1 for
location) with NIR spectral albedo and <bold>(b)</bold> thermal BT; <bold>(c)</bold> normalized NIR
albedo of all transects compared with BT with linear regression; and <bold>(d)</bold> SPWD
compared with normalized NIR albedo and thermal BT for all transects with
linear regression.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/427/2023/tc-17-427-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1431">Based on the transects, the variability in NIR albedo at a seasonal
(spring–summer) to pluriannual scale is observed to be twice as large in the
snow accumulation area on the upwind flank and the bottom of the leeward
flank (Fig. 2) compared to the glazed-surface NIR albedo (0.7 % compared
to 0.3 % NIR albedo variability), which remains more stable and more
highly correlated at a seasonal (spring–summer) and pluriannual scale.</p>
      <p id="d1e1434">The analysis of sastrugi direction using seven Landsat scenes from the
spring and summer months during the period 2013–2020 show small differences
in direction within each image and in repeated imagery (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), confirming the stability in direction of sastrugi landforms
and thus the persistence of katabatic wind.</p>
      <p id="d1e1453">The comparison of the results of wind direction obtained using sastrugi
direction by satellite (resampled using bilinear interpolation) and ERA5
present similar values for both areas, with a lower difference in the EAIIST
area (differences of 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in average values) compared to It-ITASE
(9–14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Table A3).</p>
      <p id="d1e1475">At the regional scale (30 km spatial resolution), the entire megadune field
has an average SPWD of 1.2 m km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, when calculated using sastrugi-based
wind direction, and 1.1 m km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when using ERA5, in agreement with
previous studies (e.g. Frezzotti et al., 2002b). To distinguish between
leeward (glazed surface) and windward flanks of the dunes for the two sites,
the SPWD based on sastrugi was further resampled to 120 m using bilinear
interpolation. For the SPWD on megadunes at a local scale (100 m), we
found a mean value of 5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 m km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the leeward side and
negative SPWD values, with a mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 m km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on the
windward flanks.</p>
      <p id="d1e1545">The application of the supervised classification and the
self-defined-threshold methodology on the different combination of the
analysed parameters for the 2013–2014 season and on the 17 December 2015 scene
showed contrasting results (Table 2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1551">Accuracy assessment (%) in the detection of glazed snow using a
supervised classification applied on NIR, BT and SPWD and their combination
over the four scenes of the 2013–2014 summer season and on 17 December 2015. The
results of BT and SPWD (alone) are not reported, as they present the same
result in all cases (i.e. 0 % for BT and 30 % for SPWD).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NIR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">BT–SPWD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NIR–SPWD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NIR–BT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">NIR–BT–SPWD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Nov 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">57 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">55 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11 Dec 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">55 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">27 Dec 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">45 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">28 Jan 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Season average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">78 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">83 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">70 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">78 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1768">In fact, even if the general accuracy in distinguishing firn and glazed
surfaces was on average high (mostly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 %), with the highest
values on the scene from 17 December 2015 (up to 94 % and 98 % in the
combination of NIR–SPWD for supervised and self-defined thresholds,
respectively), lower values and higher differences were found when comparing
the accuracy in detecting only glazed snow. There, the inclusion of SPWD in
the classification significantly improves the ability to detect these
surfaces, with a doubling of the accuracy during the season 2013–2014
(between 0 % and 30 % for single parameters or combination without SPWD
to around 50 % of season average in the other cases and up to 55 % for the
NIR–BT–SPWD combination). The increase is also observed for the 17 December 2015
scene, from 78 % of NIR alone to 83 % for NIR–SPWD (which becomes 95 %
in the case of NIR–SPWD for the self-defined-threshold methodology, the highest
calculated value of accuracy in detecting glazed snow). Summarizing, the
impact of the inclusion of the SPWD is evident, both applying the supervised
classification and self-defined-threshold methodology, as the SPWD doubles
the accuracy compared to the cases with no SPWD. We further observed issues
in using BT in these approaches because of its high heterogeneity at a high
scale (i.e. entire Landsat scene), as BT presents strong variations across
the image; the strong improvement in using a scene (i.e. 17 December 2015) with
no interferences (e.g. fog, clouds, “low” SZA) and close in time to the
REMA DEM (stripes from January to October 2016), leading to a significant
increase in accuracy of the method (from highest values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % of scenes from season 2013–2014 to over 80 %); and the higher
accuracy when applying a self-defined-threshold approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Megadune migration</title>
      <p id="d1e1793">The absolute megadune movement calculated using feature tracking on optical
satellite image pairs spans from 3 to 6 years and presents small differences
in the two study areas, ranging between 10.5 and 14.2 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
overall, with no detected significant trends over time. The average values
are similar when using different datasets (Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel-2)
but with Sentinel-2 velocities showing slightly lower average values
compared to Landsat 8. Moreover, due to the slightly higher spatial
resolution (10 m vs. 15 m), the number of features tracked using
Sentinel-2 is an order of magnitude higher than that of Landsat 8 OLI
(Table 1), even if the number of pixels is higher (with a ratio of 1.4) in
Landsat scenes. The direction of the migration does not differ much across
the different datasets, showing opposite values compared to wind direction.
The second method used to calculate the migration velocity is the ridge
vectorization and tracking for the same image pairs. This method shows
slightly higher velocities (16.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than IMCORR tracking
of megadune features (11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the EAIIST site for the
period 2013–2019 but within the error.</p>
      <p id="d1e1846">At the D6 It-ITASE site, five GPR–GPS transects were surveyed on megadunes
(Frezzotti et al., 2002b); the comparison between GPS elevations
(3 January 1999) and the REMA DEM (2 February 2014) provides information about the
relative change in elevation at high resolution (decametre level) of the
megadunes during the past 15 years. On the five transects, we observe an almost
stable elevation in correspondence with glazed surface/leeward flank,
whereas the maximum difference in elevation (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.2 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.9 m, with
an average maximum value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4 m) occurs always in the snow
accumulation/upwind flank on the correspondence of the trough (Fig. 4). By
projecting the transects along the prevalent wind direction (239<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), based on the surrounding sastrugi orientation, we were able to evaluate
the megadune migration using the relative change in elevation. Using the
crest/trough position of each dune, we calculated an average displacement of
11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.2 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from all transects (Fig. 4). The migration of the
dunes is evident in all transects with the upwind migration of the crest
over the upstream flank and of the trough on the upstream flank of the
previous megadune. In contrast, the glazed surfaces on the downwind flank
remained generally stable in elevation over time (Fig. 4) but are clearly
buried at the upstream flank foot and migrate at the crest. At the D6 site,
Vittuari et al. (2004) measured an ice velocity of 1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a direction of 97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using repeated GPS measurement
between 1999 and 2001. The closer value of MEaSUREs ice flow at the D6 site
is 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a direction of 89<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, in
agreement with GPS measurements. At the EAIIST site, MEaSUREs data show an
ice flow of 6.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a direction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both velocity directions agree with the topographic slope at
the site. Applying Eq. (1) for the calculation of megadune migration
components, we obtained a sedimentological migration of 18.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.7 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (229<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at EAIIST and 15.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.7 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(246<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at It-ITASE using Landsat 8 OLI data and 16.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (230<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at EAIIST and 13.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(245<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at It-ITASE with Sentinel-2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2107">Location of the GPS transects (red) at the It-ITASE site with a
false-colour Landsat 8 OLI image in the background (18 December 2014). Universal
Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. Topographic section of four transects
(<italic>A</italic>, <italic>B</italic>, <italic>C</italic>, <italic>D</italic>), with the black lines representing elevation from in situ GPS
observations (1999), red lines from the REMA DEM (2014) and blue lines from glazed
snow detected on the Landsat image from 18 December 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/427/2023/tc-17-427-2023-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Application of the automatic detection of glazed snow on megadune fields</title>
      <p id="d1e2145">In this study, we showed the possibility of calculating the SPWD based on wind
direction from ERA5 and Landsat-derived sastrugi. At both investigated
sites, the direction of the wind from ERA5 at a velocity higher than 11 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was found to be closer to the direction of sastrugi surveyed by
satellite. The small difference between the two datasets could be correlated
to the formation of sastrugi, as wind speed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was
previously reported by Kodama et al. (1985) and Wendler et al. (1993) to be
required for the formation of sastrugi. While the EAIIST site shows similar
average directions to ERA5, in the other study area (It-ITASE) a slightly
higher difference was found between the two datasets for wind velocity
slower than 11 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The direction retrieved from Landsat is strongly
dependent on high-velocity prevailing winds (katabatic winds), which shape
the sastrugi and direction, while ERA5 also takes into account wind
directions other than the katabatic. In addition, this difference could be caused
by the different spatial and temporal resolutions between the satellite and
ERA5 (30 m vs. 30 km, scene-based vs. average of 20 years), as well as
inaccuracies in the ERA5 wind direction. The larger difference in wind
direction using the various datasets (ERA5, sastrugi detected by satellite,
sastrugi measured on the field) at the It-ITASE site could also be attributed to
the higher variability in the katabatic wind direction; in fact, this site
is at the northern limit of megadune field (Fig. 1), and a relatively high
variability in katabatic wind direction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
could be among the threshold factors that does not allow for the formation of
megadunes in the northern part. However, with the aim of applying this
methodology at a large scale using ERA5 data, e.g. the whole continent, the
differences between the two sources can be significant (e.g. at the
It-ITASE site) and could produce errors in the SPWD calculation. Therefore,
the use of sastrugi could be a more accurate way to interpret the prevalent wind
direction with high wind speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to ERA5.</p>
      <p id="d1e2227">The SPWD is the only parameter that could be considered almost constant
at a 10 km scale, in consideration of the stability of the direction of the
katabatic wind, driven mainly by surface slope and the Coriolis force. In
contrast, albedo and above all thermal BT change both temporally, annually
and during seasons, and spatially across the satellite scene. In fact, NIR
albedo significantly varies because of surface changes of up to 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and between the beginning, the middle and the end of the summer season in
relation to the SZA by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01–0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Frezzotti et al. (2002b) pointed out the presence of huge sastrugi (up to 1.5 m in height)
located on the windward flank and alternation of sastrugi (up to 40 cm) and
glazed surfaces located at the bottom of the interdune area. The observed
change on NIR albedo and BT on the windward flank is correlated to the
sastrugi formation and deterioration during the season and their relative
change in shadow (Warren, 1982). In addition, thermal BT varies from a
higher temperature near the summer solstice to lower values in late spring
and summer, in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5–10 K. In both cases, the differences
between leeward flanks where glazed surfaces are located and windward flanks
of megadunes are not high enough to overcome the seasonal variability and
thus a constant range for albedo and temperature is impossible to determine.
Spatially, the satellite-derived NIR and thermal BT show large variability
inside the same satellite images, in particular for thermal BT, but strong
correlation among the two parameters up to an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.99 along each
transect. The observed variabilities could be related to the different
illumination condition and meteorological conditions with development of
surface hoar crystal due to fog and under calm sunny weather with a downward
as well as an upward vapour source to the near-surface layer. The growth of
surface hoar crystals dramatically changes the snow structure, specific
surface area and density, as well as surface roughness, leading to
significant changes in albedo and therefore surface temperature (Gallet et
al., 2014). For these reasons, different thresholds can not only be required when
investigating an entire tile of Landsat in the case of
self-defined-threshold methodology but also can explain the inability of
supervised classification based only on BT to distinguish between glazed
snow and firn. With BT, in fact, the difference in values across the images
is higher than the mean spectral difference between these two surfaces at
these wavelengths. For the same reasons, the classification approaches
including BT present, in most cases, lower accuracy than the other cases,
suggesting against using it to map glazed snow at a large scale. On the other
hand, NIR albedo does not show this sort of problem and instead demonstrates
good ability in distinguishing between the two surfaces, with a good
accuracy even when used alone (especially in the 17 December 2015 case, Table 2).
Additionally, it is evident how the implementation of SPWD is fundamental in
aiding the detection of glazed snow, together with the NIR band,
particularly by improving the detection even when the other parameters
present more uncertainties (owing to e.g. SZA and fog). In fact, in all
the combinations where SPWD is included, the accuracy in the distinction
between glazed snow and firn shows more constant results and minimum and
maximum accuracy across the analysed season is similar. Finally, our results
point out the importance of using satellite images with no interferences
(e.g. clouds, fog, high SZA), with the aim of automatically detecting
glazed snow, as the accuracy of the method drastically increases
(17 December 2015 compared to the other cases) and also that the
self-defined-threshold approach provides better results in terms of accuracy
than the supervised classification. Nevertheless, even if the
self-defined-threshold model shows a higher accuracy, supervised
classification allows for overcoming the issue of defining accurate thresholds
across a certain season, providing good accuracy results especially on good
quality images, as calculated on 17 December 2015.</p>
      <p id="d1e2269">By using the classifications with the highest accuracy in the EAIIST area
achieved based on the scene from 17 December 2015 (NIR–SPWD combination), where
approximately 75 % of the area is covered by megadunes, we could calculate
that the glazed surfaces cover around 43 % of this specific dune area,
i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 % of leeward flanks.</p>
      <p id="d1e2279">In conclusion, the detection of glazed surface/ablation area by satellite
images is challenging because of differences in illumination and
meteorological conditions (cloud cover, blowing snow, etc.) among different
satellite images. Nevertheless, the high-resolution digital terrain model
(REMA) allows for calculating an SPWD with unprecedented detail, similar to the
resolution of optical satellites (Landsat 8–9, Sentinel), and significantly
improves the detection of glazed/ablation surfaces at 10 m scale across
the continent; therefore, it could significantly improve research on the SMB
of the Antarctic Ice Sheet.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Megadune upwind migration</title>
      <p id="d1e2290">The absolute position of the megadune crest and trough are driven mainly by
two processes: snow ablation/accumulation processes and ice sheet surface
flow. GPS and GPR profiles along the It-ITASE traverse show the presence of
paleo-megadunes buried up to the investigation depth of 20 m (Frezzotti et
al., 2002b). Analysis of the D6 firn core allowed for detecting the Tambora
eruption signal (1816 CE) at 15.36 m depth with an average snow accumulation
of 36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8 mm w.e. a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas an average value of 29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 mm w.e. a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of spatial variability in SMB at D6 site was evaluated by
GPR calibrated using accumulation at three firn cores (Frezzotti et al.,
2005). The elevation changes during 15 years observed using GPS and REMA
show a relative increase in accumulation on the windward flank with the
maximum value at the trough compared to the glazed-surface area from 29 to
46 mm w.e. a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average value of 34 mm w.e. a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, using a
density of 360 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the first 2 m. This value is very close
to the estimated change in accumulation in the megadune area from 7 to 35 mm w.e. a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> provided by Frezzotti et al. (2002b) using the variability in
GPR internal layering at the megadune site. The minimum value represents a
decrease in accumulation of up to 75 % or more on glazed surfaces. The
relative stability of glazed surfaces with respect to elevation change and
NIR albedo confirms the extremely stable SMB low value of the glazed
surfaces with respect to accumulation areas, due to the long-term hiatus in
SMB forced by wind scouring processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e2377">Using the isochrone distance of 1.5–1.8 km between the 180-year-old
paleo-crest detected by GPR and the recent crest from GPS observations
(1998–1999 CE), we can evaluate the windward migration of the paleo-megadune
crest at about 8–10 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This vector from field observations summed
with an ice flow from GPS of 1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a direction
of 97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> produced an absolute migration of 10.3 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a
direction of 214<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This value is in very good agreement with
absolute migration calculated using the elevation comparison between GPS and
REMA (11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.2 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and with satellite tracking (from 11.4 to
14.0 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), in particular with Sentinel-2 images (11.4 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Table 1). At the D6 site, the movement components show different intensity
with an order of magnitude of difference: 1–2 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for ice flow
vs. 13.6–15.4 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for sedimentological migration. The components
present nearly opposite directions: 97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for ice flow and
245<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for sedimentological migration. The results allowed us to
calculate all the components of migration and to conclude that for a
megadune with a wavelength of 3 km we could calculate an absolute migration
of approximately 10 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This burying process of snow on glazed
surfaces takes about 300 years, with a overlap of the crest to the trough and glazed
to sastrugi surface as observed by GPR internal layering. These results are
strongly in accordance with Courville (2007), who determined a burial rate
of 330 years based on a firn core drilled in 2003/04 and migration rates of
approx. 12 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (from AVHRR data; Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer) at a field located at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">124</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E in the megadune region of the EAIIST site.</p>
      <p id="d1e2587">The megadune migration on the upwind part observed by elevation change and
tracking is also confirmed by the comparison of NIR and BT along the studied
transects. These parameters remain relatively stable during the observed
time on the glazed surface on the leeward flank, whereas the positive SMB
upwind flank and bottom trough area change significantly not only at a pluriannual
scale but also at a seasonal scale. Hence, we observe a general
overestimation of sedimentological and absolute migration using remote
sensing with a mean difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.9 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Sentinel-2
(uncertainties of 19 % for sedimentological migration and 10 % for
absolute migration). Using Landsat 8 OLI images, larger differences were
found, with an average overestimation of 3.8 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This difference
could be caused by spatial variability in processes: with remote sensing we
analysed a much wider area, as opposed to in situ observations which were
acquired in transects on a limited section of the megadune field. Finally,
the spatial resolution and geolocation (Mouginot et al., 2017) could affect
the satellite data, as demonstrated by the worse results obtained using
Landsat images at 15 m spatial resolution against 10 m resolution of Sentinel-2.</p>
      <p id="d1e2621">The ice velocity of MEaSUREs is based on SAR images and is in very good
agreement with GPS measurement, and the tracking methods of IMCORR using
optical images and crest displacement are in agreement with the migration of
morphologies observed from the comparison between change in elevation by GPS
and REMA. Based on our analysis, the sedimentological processes are
analogous at the It-ITASE and EAIIST sites. At the second site, a faster
ice-flow motion was observed by MEaSUREs, and the velocity of absolute
migration is reduced by almost 35 %, compared to the initial
sedimentological-migration velocity.</p>
      <p id="d1e2625">The ice velocity based on SAR images presents a phase centre that penetrates
up to 10 m on dry and cold firn (Rignot et al., 2001) and provides
information on ice flow and not surface features. In contrast, using feature
tracking on optical images (Landsat and Sentinel-2), it is possible to
estimate the absolute migration (migration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ice flow) of surface features
that could be significantly different from ice flow as for the megadunes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2644">This study significantly improved the previous knowledge on the
temporal/spatial variability in Antarctic megadunes and glazed surfaces,
measurements of their sedimentation/migration, and their interaction with
the atmosphere and ice sheet surface. The snow accumulation
distribution/variability processes that allow megadune formation have
important consequences concerning the choice of sites for ice coring and SMB
evaluation, since orographic variations of a few metres per kilometre have a
significant impact on the snow accumulation process. Furthermore, these new
results represent a new ground truth and foundation of knowledge for ice
sheet mass balance research, in particular for satellite altimeter and ice
velocity derived by remote sensing measurements (e.g. radar vs.
optical/lidar).</p>
      <p id="d1e2647">The new results confirm and quantify the previous hypotheses and provide new
relevant information on different aspects of these peculiar landforms
showing that the megadune is a dynamic feature at different spatial and
temporal scales.</p>
      <p id="d1e2650">The glazed-surface/megadune survey has revealed previously unknown large
spatial variability in ice sheet SMB, superimposed on the large-scale
gradients in SMB from the coast to the interior. On smaller scales
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km), SMB varies considerably as well, driven by surface
topography undulations (SPWD) and consequent wind-driven snow ablation and
redistribution, which challenges the spatial representativeness of stake and
firn/ice core records. Moreover, this small-scale variability is not
represented by regional climate model systems used for SMB evaluation (e.g. Agosta et al., 2019; Lenaerts et al., 2019), which currently
operate at horizontal resolutions of typically 25 km for East Antarctica.
Previous studies have pointed out that glazed areas are extensive enough to
have a significant impact on current estimates of SMB and therefore overall
mass balance using the mass budget method (Frezzotti et al., 2004; Das et
al., 2013; Scambos et al., 2012). The scale of the overestimation is of the
same order of magnitude as the total error reported for East Antarctica and
a large fraction of the currently reported error bars for Antarctic-wide
mass balance (Rignot et al.,
2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e2660">Considering the characteristics of megadunes, the leeward glazed flanks show
a lower NIR albedo (up to 0.1) and higher BT (up to 1.5 K) compared to
windward snow-covered sides within each of the five transects analysed. NIR
albedo and thermal BT, combined with the SPWD, allowed us to produce a
method for automatically detecting glazed surfaces. High correlations were
found between SPWD and NIR albedo and thermal BT with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of up to 0.44
and 0.57, respectively, calculated along the whole transect examined in
2013–2014, with differences between spring and the end of summer. The correlations
between SPWD and NIR albedo on the transects decrease to 0.39 in comparison
with the image from December 2019. Moreover, the high correlation of NIR albedo
between images decreases over time by up to 60 % between November 2013 and December 2019. Our results support the importance of SPWD (especially when
sufficiently synchronous with spectral imagery, in consideration of the
migration of megadunes) for megadune snow characterization. Together with
NIR albedo, the SPWD was found to be more important than BT in the
classification and to provide a higher accuracy than spectral data only, by
allowing accuracy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 % in detecting glazed snow. Further
research might consider other parameters to automatically detect snow glazed
surfaces, including snow grain size or the normalized difference snow index.</p>
      <p id="d1e2682">Finally, we provided for the first time an estimation of megadune migration
from field and remote observations at the It-ITASE site. The results
obtained using field measurements and remote observations allow for calculating
all the components of megadune migration, absolute (11–14 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
sedimentological migration (13–15 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the ice flow (1–2 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and to conclude that for megadunes with a wavelength of 3 km and
migration of approximately 10 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the burying process of snow on
glazed surfaces takes about 300 years, with an overlap of the crest to the trough and
glazed to sastrugi surface.</p>
      <p id="d1e2733">The reconstruction of paleo-climate based on firn/ice cores drilled in
the megadune or downstream area is very complex; the distortion of recordings is
characterized by a snow accumulation/hiatus periodicity of about hundreds of
years. The length of periodic variations due to mesoscale relief and/or
megadunes depends on ice velocity, megadune migration and snow accumulation
and can therefore vary in space and time within the 500 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of
the megadune field and downstream area. In the end, our work points out the
importance of antidune sedimentological processes in megadune fields
with an almost opposite direction between the migration of surface features
and ice flow derived, respectively, from feature tracking of optical images
and SAR. These results present significant implication for surface
measurements using radar/lidar altimetric satellite and measurements of ice
flow using optical and SAR images in the megadune area. Moreover, our results
point out the different elevation behaviour at a pluriannual scale of the
stable elevation and NIR albedo of glazed surface, while the snow-covered
surface changes elevation and NIR albedo, with a higher
accumulation/elevation in correspondence with the previous trough,
decreasing from the trough towards the windward crest. The wind-driven process
greatly affects the SMB of the megadune area, which implies that all or most
of the regional accumulation (as determined by RACMO and other models) is
gathered in the accretionary faces, whereas in the downwind area the SMB is
near zero with a long hiatus in snow accumulation.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title/>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d1e2759">Landsat (OLI) and Sentinel-2 (S2) images in the EAIIST (069119 and
T51CWL tiles for L8OLI and S2, respectively) and It-ITASE (081114 and T52CEA
tiles for L8OLI and S2, respectively) areas used in the study with
corresponding solar zenith and azimuth angles from the Landsat/Sentinel
metadata.
</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sensor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Scene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Solar zenith</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Azimuth</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 Nov 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11 Dec 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27 Dec 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 Jan 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">95</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 Nov 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">95</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4 Nov 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 Nov 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 Dec 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">069119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29 Jan 2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">95</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">081114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31 Oct 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">081114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 Dec 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">081114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18 Dec 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">081114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">69</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">081114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30 Nov 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">081114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17 Jan 2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">T51CWL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 Jan 2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">T51CWL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 Jan 2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">T52CEA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13 Dec 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">T52CEA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27 Dec 2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S1.T4"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><?xmltex \currentcnt{A2}?><label>Table A2</label><caption><p id="d1e3220">Frequency of the REMA DEM stripes at the EAIIST and It-ITASE sites
from different years, based on the REMA strip index.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">It-ITASE </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">EAIIST </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Year</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No. of stripes</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Percentage of the total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">No. of stripes</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Percentage of the total</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.4 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.9 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">128</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.7 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">217</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">184</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.6 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">136</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">593</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41.6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">398</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">169</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">102</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.9 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S1.T5"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><?xmltex \currentcnt{A3}?><label>Table A3</label><caption><p id="d1e3461">Wind direction statistics (average, maximum and minimum values)
for the considered datasets: Landsat 8 at 30 m spatial resolution and ERA5
at 30 km spatial resolution (divided into five sub-datasets according to wind
speed) at the EAIIST and It-ITASE sites.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">EAIIST </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col8" align="center">It-ITASE </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dataset</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Min</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Dataset</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Min</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Landsat 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">224<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">232<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">212<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Landsat 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">250<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">215<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">225<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">230<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">220<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">227<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">236<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">215<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">225<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">229<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">220<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">226<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">233<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">217<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">225<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">229<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">220<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">226<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">234<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">217<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">225<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">235<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">220<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">227<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">236<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">218<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">223<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">229<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">216<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">231<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">223<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4170">Data used for the aims of the present study are available from different
repositories.
Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 imagery are available at
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5066/P9OGBGM6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5066/P9OGBGM6</ext-link> (Earth Resources Observation And Science (EROS) Center, 2013) and <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5270/S2_-znk9xsj" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5270/S2_-znk9xsj</ext-link> (European Space Agency, 2022).
ERA5 data are available at
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link> (Hersbach et al., 2018).
The REMA DEM is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/X7NDNY" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7910/DVN/X7NDNY</ext-link> (Howat et al., 2022). Field data were obtained
from previously published papers, i.e. Frezzotti et al. (2002a, b) and
Vitturari et al. (2004).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4188">GT and MF conceived the idea of this work. GT and DF developed the procedure
and processed the satellite image and data. All authors contributed to the
writing of the final manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4194">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4200">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{~\\[48mm]}?><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4209">The authors are thankful to the PNRA (National Antarctic Research Program) and
MNA (National Antarctic Museum) of Italy (fellowship and PhD
scholarship to Giacomo Traversa, respectively) and
Levissima Sanpellegrino S.p.A. (post-doc fellowship to Davide Fugazza). This
study was supported by the <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>EAIIST<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> project (no. ANR-16-CE01-0011), the Institut
Polaire Français Paul-Émile Victor (IPEV), the National Antarctic
Research Program (PNRA), the French National Research Agency, the Department of Science of the Università degli Studi Roma Tre  (Minister of University and Research Italy, Dipartimenti Eccellenza 2023–2027) and the Department for Regional Affairs and Autonomies (DARA). The
authors would like to warmly thank all the participants of the It-ITASE and
EAIIST traverses for their tremendous field contributions allowing for the
collection of the crucial in situ measurements used in this study. Finally,
the authors thank the editor, Ted Scambos, Stef Lhermitte and an anonymous
referee for having revised the paper; their suggestions have strongly
improved the quality of the research.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4218">The research has been supported by Levissima Sanpellegrino S.P.A. (grant no. LIB_VT17GDIOL, postdoc fellowship to Davide Fugazza).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4224">This paper was edited by Olaf Eisen and reviewed by Ted Scambos, Stef Lhermitte, and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Agosta, C., Amory, C., Kittel, C., Orsi, A., Favier, V., Gallée, H., van den Broeke, M. R., Lenaerts, J. T. M., van Wessem, J. M., van de Berg, W. J., and Fettweis, X.: Estimation of the Antarctic surface mass balance using the regional climate model MAR (1979–2015) and identification of dominant processes, The Cryosphere, 13, 281–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-281-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-13-281-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Albert, M., Shuman, C., Courville, Z., Bauer, R., Fahnestock, M., and
Scambos, T.: Extreme firn metamorphism: impact of decades of vapor transport
on near-surface firn at a low-accumulation glazed site on the East Antarctic
plateau, Ann. Glaciol., 39, 73–78,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756404781814041</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arcone, S. A., Jacobel, R., and Hamilton, G.: Unconformable stratigraphy in
East Antarctica: Part I. Large firn cosets, recrystallized growth, and model
evidence for intensified accumulation, J. Glaciol., 58, 240–252,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoJ11J044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2012JoJ11J044</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arcone, S. A., Jacobel, R., and Hamilton, G.: Unconformable stratigraphy in
East Antarctica: Part II. Englacial cosets and recrystallized layers, J.
Glaciol., 58, 253–264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2012JoG11J045</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Azzoni, R. S., Senese, A., Zerboni, A., Maugeri, M., Smiraglia, C., and Diolaiuti, G. A.: Estimating ice albedo from fine debris cover quantified by a semi-automatic method: the case study of Forni Glacier, Italian Alps, The Cryosphere, 10, 665–679, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-665-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-10-665-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canny, J.: A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE T. Pattern
Anal. Mach. Intell., PAMI-8, 679–698, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Courville, Z. R.: Gas diffusivity and air permeability of the firn from cold
polar sites, PhD thesis, Dartmouth College,  3341626, <uri>https://www.proquest.com/openview/67a457ce9973e10b601ba324a525b3f0/1?cbl=18750&amp;pq-origsite=gscholar&amp;parentSessionId=UpZ4V8N6xSPAcKTOy9xE7le%2FzOB69XIB%2FSnUxdEWmwk%3D</uri> (last access: 15 January 2023), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Courville, Z. R., Albert, M. R., Fahnestock, M. A., Cathles, L. M., and
Shuman, C. A.: Impacts of an accumulation hiatus on the physical properties
of firn at a low-accumulation polar site, J. Geophys. Res., 112, F02030,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000429" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JF000429</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dadic, R., Mott, R., Horgan, H. J., and Lehning, M.: Observations, theory,
and modeling of the differential accumulation of Antarctic megadunes:
accumulation of Antarctic megadunes, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 118,
2343–2353, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002844" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JF002844</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Das, I., Bell, R. E., Scambos, T. A., Wolovick, M., Creyts, T. T.,
Studinger, M., Frearson, N., Nicolas, J. P., Lenaerts, J. T. M., and van den
Broeke, M. R.: Influence of persistent wind scour on the surface mass
balance of Antarctica, Nat. Geosci., 6, 367–371,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1766" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1766</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Earth Resources Observation And Science (EROS) Center: Collection-2 Landsat 8-9 OLI (Operational Land Imager) and TIRS (Thermal Infrared Sensor) Level-2 Science Products,  Earth Resources Observation And Science (EROS) Center [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5066/P9OGBGM6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5066/P9OGBGM6</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ekaykin, A. A., Lipenkov, V. Ya., and Shibaev, Yu. A.: Spatial Distribution
of the Snow Accumulation Rate Along the Ice Flow Lines Between Ridge B and
Lake Vostok, Ice Snow, Journal of ice and snow, 52, 122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2012-4-122-128" ext-link-type="DOI">10.15356/2076-6734-2012-4-122-128</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>European Space Agency: Sentinel-2 MSI Level-2A BOA Reflectance,  European Space Agency [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5270/S2_-znk9xsj" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5270/S2_-znk9xsj</ext-link>,  2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fahnestock, M. A., Scambos, T. A., Shuman, C. A., Arthern, R. J.,
Winebrenner, D. P., and Kwok, R.: Snow megadune fields on the East Antarctic
Plateau: Extreme atmosphere-ice interaction, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27,
3719–3722, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL011248</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frezzotti, M., Gandolfi, S., Marca, F. L., and Urbini, S.: Snow dunes and
glazed surfaces in Antarctica: new field and remote-sensing data, Ann.
Glaciol., 34, 81–88, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756402781817851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756402781817851</ext-link>, 2002a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frezzotti, M., Gandolfi, S., and Urbini, S.: Snow megadunes in Antarctica:
Sedimentary structure and genesis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACL
1-1–ACL 1-12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000673" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000673</ext-link>, 2002b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frezzotti, M., Pourchet, M., Flora, O., Gandolfi, S., Gay, M., Urbini, S.,
Vincent, C., Becagli, S., Gragnani, R., and Proposito, M.: New estimations
of precipitation and surface sublimation in East Antarctica from snow
accumulation measurements, Clim. Dynam., 23, 803–813,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0462-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-004-0462-5</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frezzotti, M., Pourchet, M., Flora, O., Gandolfi, S., Gay, M., Urbini, S.,
Vincent, C., Becagli, S., Gragnani, R., and Proposito, M.: Spatial and
temporal variability of snow accumulation in East Antarctica from traverse
data, J. Glaciol., 51, 113–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756505781829502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756505781829502</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fujii, Y., Yamanouchi, T., Suzuki, K., and Tanaka, S.: Comparison of the
Surface Conditions of the Inland Ice Sheet, Dronning Maud Land. Antarctica.
Derived from Noaa AVHRR Data with Ground Observation, Ann. Glaciol., 9,
72–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500000410" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S0260305500000410</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gallet, J.-C., Domine, F., Savarino, J., Dumont, M., and Brun, E.: The growth of sublimation crystals and surface hoar on the Antarctic plateau, The Cryosphere, 8, 1205–1215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1205-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-1205-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.:  ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1959 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková,
M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.: The ERA5 Global
Reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, qj.3803,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Howat, I. M., Porter, C., Smith, B. E., Noh, M.-J., and Morin, P.: The Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 13, 665–674, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-665-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-13-665-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Howat, I., Porter, C., Noh, M.-J., Husby, E., Khuvis, S., Danish, E., Tomko, K., Gardiner, J., Negrete, A., Yadav, B., Klassen, J., Kelleher, C., Cloutier, M., Bakker, J., Enos, J., Arnold, G., Bauer, G., and Morin, P.: The Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica – Strips, Version 4.1,  Harvard Dataverse, V1 [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/X7NDNY" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7910/DVN/X7NDNY</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jawak, S. D., Kumar, S., Luis, A. J., Bartanwala, M., Tummala, S., and Pandey, A. C.,  Evaluation of Geospatial Tools for Generating Accurate Glacier Velocity Maps from Optical Remote Sensing Data, Proceedings, 2, 341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ecrs-2-05154" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/ecrs-2-05154</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jezek, K. C.: Glaciological properties of the Antarctic ice sheet from
RADARSAT-1 synthetic aperture radar imagery, Ann. Glaciol., 29, 286–290,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756499781820969" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756499781820969</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Klok, E. L., Greuell, W., and Oerlemans, J.: Temporal and spatial variation
of the surface albedo of Morteratschgletscher, Switzerland, as derived from
12 Landsat images, J. Glaciol., 49, 491–502,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756503781830395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756503781830395</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kodama, Y., Wendler, G., and Gosink, J.: The effect of blowing snow on
katabatic winds in Antarctica, Ann. Glaciol., 6, 59–62,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/1985AoG6-1-59-62" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/1985AoG6-1-59-62</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lenaerts, J. T., Medley, B., van den Broeke, M. R., and Wouters, B.:
Observing and modeling ice sheet surface mass balance, Rev. Geophys., 57,
376–420, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liang, S.: Narrowband to broadband conversions of land surface albedo I:
Algorithms, Remote Sens. Environ., 76, 213–238,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00205-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00205-4</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mather, K. B.: Further observations on sastrugi, snow dunes and the pattern
of surface winds in Antarctica, Polar Rec., 11, 158–171,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400052888" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0032247400052888</ext-link>, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Meredith, M., Sommerkorn, M., Cassotta, S., Derksen, C., Ekaykin, A.,
Hollowed, A., Kofinas, G., Mackintosh, A., Melbourne-Thomas, J., and
Muelbert, M. M. C.: Polar Regions, chap. 3, IPCC Special Report on the
Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157964.005</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mouginot, J., Rignot, E., Scheuchl, B., and Millan, R.: Comprehensive annual
ice sheet velocity mapping using Landsat-8, Sentinel-1, and RADARSAT-2 data,
Remote Sens., 9, 364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs9040364</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Núñez-González, F. and Martín-Vide, J. P.: Analysis of
antidune migration direction, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 116, F02004,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001761" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JF001761</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Palm, S. P., Yang, Y., and Kayetha, V.: New Perspectives on Blowing Snow in Antarctica and Implications for Ice Sheet Mass Balance, in: Antarctica – A Key To Global Change, edited by: Kanao, M., Toyokuni, G., and Yamamoto, M., IntechOpen, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81319" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5772/intechopen.81319</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Parish, T. R. and Bromwich, D. H.: Continental-scale simulation of the
Antarctic katabatic wind regime, J. Climate, 4, 135–146,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1991)004&lt;0135:CSSOTA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(1991)004&lt;0135:CSSOTA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Picard, G., Libois, Q., Arnaud, L., Verin, G., and Dumont, M.: Development and calibration of an automatic spectral albedometer to estimate near-surface snow SSA time series, The Cryosphere, 10, 1297–1316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1297-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-10-1297-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pietroni, I., Argentini, S., and Petenko, I.: One year of surface-based
temperature inversions at Dome C, Antarctica, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol.,
150, 131–151, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pirazzini, R.: Surface albedo measurements over Antarctic sites in summer,
J. Geophys. Res., 109, D20118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004617" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004617</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Proposito, M., Becagli, S., Castellano, E., Flora, O., Genoni, L., Gragnani,
R., Stenni, B., Traversi, R., Udisti, R., and Frezzotti, M.: Chemical and
isotopic snow variability along the 1998 ITASE traverse from Terra Nova Bay
to Dome C, East Antarctica, Ann. Glaciol., 35, 187–194,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756402781817167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756402781817167</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prothero, D. R. and Schwab, F.: Sedimentary geology, Macmillan,  ISBN 978-1-4292-3155-8, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rignot, E., Echelmeyer, K., and Krabill, W.: Penetration depth of
interferometric synthetic-aperture radar signals in snow and ice, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 28, 3501–3504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012484" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GL012484</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., and Scheuchl, B.: MEaSUREs InSAR-based Antarctica
ice velocity map, version 2, Boulder CO NASA DAAC Natl. Snow Ice Data Cent. [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/D7GK8F5J8M8R" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/D7GK8F5J8M8R</ext-link>.
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., Scheuchl, B., van den Broeke, M., van Wessem, M.
J., and Morlighem, M.: Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance from
1979–2017, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 1095–1103,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812883116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1812883116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scambos, T. A., Dutkiewicz, M. J., Wilson, J. C., and Bindschadler, R. A.:
Application of image cross-correlation to the measurement of glacier
velocity using satellite image data, Remote Sens. Environ., 42, 177–186,
1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scambos, T. A., Frezzotti, M., Haran, T., Bohlander, J., Lenaerts, J. T. M.,
Van Den Broeke, M. R., Jezek, K., Long, D., Urbini, S., Farness, K.,
Neumann, T., Albert, M., and Winther, J.-G.: Extent of low-accumulation
“wind glaze” areas on the East Antarctic plateau: implications for
continental ice mass balance, J. Glaciol., 58, 633–647,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J232" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2012JoG11J232</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Swithinbank, C., Ferrigno, J. G., Williams, R. S., and  Chinn, T. J.: Antarctica, Geological Survey professional paper , 1386-B. U.S. G.P.O., Washington, DC, <uri>https://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.31210020769210</uri> (last access: 13 January 2023), 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Traversa, G. and Fugazza, D.: Evaluation of Anisotropic Correction Factors
for the Calculation of Landsat 8 OLI Albedo on the Ice Sheets, Geogr. Fis. Din.
Quar., 44, 91–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2021.44.8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4461/GFDQ.2021.44.8</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Traversa, G., Fugazza, D., Senese, A., and Diolaiuti, G. A.: Preliminary
results on Antarctic albedo from remote sensing observations, Geogr. Fis. Din.
Quat., 42, 245–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2019.42.14" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4461/GFDQ.2019.42.14</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Traversa, G., Fugazza, D., Senese, A., and Frezzotti, M.: Landsat 8 OLI
Broadband Albedo Validation in Antarctica and Greenland, Remote Sens., 13,
799, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040799" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs13040799</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Traversa, G., Fugazza, D., and Frezzotti, M.: Analysis of Megadune Fields in
Antarctica, in: 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium IGARSS, 5513–5516,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9554827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9554827</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Wessem, J. M., Reijmer, C. H., Morlighem, M., Mouginot, J., Rignot, E.,
Medley, B., Joughin, I., Wouters, B., Depoorter, M. A., Bamber, J. L.,
Lenaerts, J. T. M., Van De Berg, W. J., Van Den Broeke, M. R., and Van
Meijgaard, E.: Improved representation of East Antarctic surface mass
balance in a regional atmospheric climate model, J. Glaciol., 60, 761–770,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG14J051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2014JoG14J051</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vittuari, L., Vincent, C., Frezzotti, M., Mancini, F., Gandolfi, S.,
Bitelli, G., and Capra, A.: Space geodesy as a tool for measuring ice
surface velocity in the Dome C region and along the ITASE traverse, Ann.
Glaciol., 39, 402–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814627" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756404781814627</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Warren, S. G.: Optical properties of snow, Rev. Geophys., 20, 67–89,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i001p00067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/RG020i001p00067</ext-link>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wendler, G., André, J. C., Pettré, P., Gosink, J., and Parish, T.:
Katabatic winds in Adélie coast, in: Antarctic Meteorology and Climatology: Studies Based on Automatic Weather Stations, edited by:  Bromwich, D. H. and  Stearns, C. R., 61, 23–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/AR061p0023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/AR061p0023</ext-link>,
1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zanter, K.: Landsat 8 (L8) data users handbook, Landsat Sci. Off. Website, <uri>https://d9-wret.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets/palladium/production/s3fs-public/atoms/files/LSDS-1574_L8_Data_Users_Handbook-v5.0.pdf</uri> (last access:13 January 2023),
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Megadunes in Antarctica: migration and characterization from remote and in situ observations</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agosta, C., Amory, C., Kittel, C., Orsi, A., Favier, V., Gallée, H., van den Broeke, M. R., Lenaerts, J. T. M., van Wessem, J. M., van de Berg, W. J., and Fettweis, X.: Estimation of the Antarctic surface mass balance using the regional climate model MAR (1979–2015) and identification of dominant processes, The Cryosphere, 13, 281–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-281-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-281-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Albert, M., Shuman, C., Courville, Z., Bauer, R., Fahnestock, M., and
Scambos, T.: Extreme firn metamorphism: impact of decades of vapor transport
on near-surface firn at a low-accumulation glazed site on the East Antarctic
plateau, Ann. Glaciol., 39, 73–78,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814041</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Arcone, S. A., Jacobel, R., and Hamilton, G.: Unconformable stratigraphy in
East Antarctica: Part I. Large firn cosets, recrystallized growth, and model
evidence for intensified accumulation, J. Glaciol., 58, 240–252,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoJ11J044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoJ11J044</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Arcone, S. A., Jacobel, R., and Hamilton, G.: Unconformable stratigraphy in
East Antarctica: Part II. Englacial cosets and recrystallized layers, J.
Glaciol., 58, 253–264, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J045</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Azzoni, R. S., Senese, A., Zerboni, A., Maugeri, M., Smiraglia, C., and Diolaiuti, G. A.: Estimating ice albedo from fine debris cover quantified by a semi-automatic method: the case study of Forni Glacier, Italian Alps, The Cryosphere, 10, 665–679, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-665-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-665-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Canny, J.: A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE T. Pattern
Anal. Mach. Intell., PAMI-8, 679–698, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Courville, Z. R.: Gas diffusivity and air permeability of the firn from cold
polar sites, PhD thesis, Dartmouth College,  3341626, <a href="https://www.proquest.com/openview/67a457ce9973e10b601ba324a525b3f0/1?cbl=18750&amp;pq-origsite=gscholar&amp;parentSessionId=UpZ4V8N6xSPAcKTOy9xE7le%2FzOB69XIB%2FSnUxdEWmwk%3D" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 January 2023), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Courville, Z. R., Albert, M. R., Fahnestock, M. A., Cathles, L. M., and
Shuman, C. A.: Impacts of an accumulation hiatus on the physical properties
of firn at a low-accumulation polar site, J. Geophys. Res., 112, F02030,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000429" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000429</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Dadic, R., Mott, R., Horgan, H. J., and Lehning, M.: Observations, theory,
and modeling of the differential accumulation of Antarctic megadunes:
accumulation of Antarctic megadunes, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 118,
2343–2353, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002844" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002844</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Das, I., Bell, R. E., Scambos, T. A., Wolovick, M., Creyts, T. T.,
Studinger, M., Frearson, N., Nicolas, J. P., Lenaerts, J. T. M., and van den
Broeke, M. R.: Influence of persistent wind scour on the surface mass
balance of Antarctica, Nat. Geosci., 6, 367–371,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1766" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1766</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Earth Resources Observation And Science (EROS) Center: Collection-2 Landsat 8-9 OLI (Operational Land Imager) and TIRS (Thermal Infrared Sensor) Level-2 Science Products,  Earth Resources Observation And Science (EROS) Center [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5066/P9OGBGM6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5066/P9OGBGM6</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ekaykin, A. A., Lipenkov, V. Ya., and Shibaev, Yu. A.: Spatial Distribution
of the Snow Accumulation Rate Along the Ice Flow Lines Between Ridge B and
Lake Vostok, Ice Snow, Journal of ice and snow, 52, 122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2012-4-122-128" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.15356/2076-6734-2012-4-122-128</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
European Space Agency: Sentinel-2 MSI Level-2A BOA Reflectance,  European Space Agency [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5270/S2_-znk9xsj" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5270/S2_-znk9xsj</a>,  2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Fahnestock, M. A., Scambos, T. A., Shuman, C. A., Arthern, R. J.,
Winebrenner, D. P., and Kwok, R.: Snow megadune fields on the East Antarctic
Plateau: Extreme atmosphere-ice interaction, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27,
3719–3722, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011248</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Frezzotti, M., Gandolfi, S., Marca, F. L., and Urbini, S.: Snow dunes and
glazed surfaces in Antarctica: new field and remote-sensing data, Ann.
Glaciol., 34, 81–88, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756402781817851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756402781817851</a>, 2002a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Frezzotti, M., Gandolfi, S., and Urbini, S.: Snow megadunes in Antarctica:
Sedimentary structure and genesis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACL
1-1–ACL 1-12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000673" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000673</a>, 2002b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Frezzotti, M., Pourchet, M., Flora, O., Gandolfi, S., Gay, M., Urbini, S.,
Vincent, C., Becagli, S., Gragnani, R., and Proposito, M.: New estimations
of precipitation and surface sublimation in East Antarctica from snow
accumulation measurements, Clim. Dynam., 23, 803–813,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0462-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0462-5</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Frezzotti, M., Pourchet, M., Flora, O., Gandolfi, S., Gay, M., Urbini, S.,
Vincent, C., Becagli, S., Gragnani, R., and Proposito, M.: Spatial and
temporal variability of snow accumulation in East Antarctica from traverse
data, J. Glaciol., 51, 113–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756505781829502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756505781829502</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Fujii, Y., Yamanouchi, T., Suzuki, K., and Tanaka, S.: Comparison of the
Surface Conditions of the Inland Ice Sheet, Dronning Maud Land. Antarctica.
Derived from Noaa AVHRR Data with Ground Observation, Ann. Glaciol., 9,
72–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500000410" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500000410</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gallet, J.-C., Domine, F., Savarino, J., Dumont, M., and Brun, E.: The growth of sublimation crystals and surface hoar on the Antarctic plateau, The Cryosphere, 8, 1205–1215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1205-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1205-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.:  ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1959 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková,
M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.: The ERA5 Global
Reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, qj.3803,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Howat, I. M., Porter, C., Smith, B. E., Noh, M.-J., and Morin, P.: The Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 13, 665–674, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-665-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-665-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Howat, I., Porter, C., Noh, M.-J., Husby, E., Khuvis, S., Danish, E., Tomko, K., Gardiner, J., Negrete, A., Yadav, B., Klassen, J., Kelleher, C., Cloutier, M., Bakker, J., Enos, J., Arnold, G., Bauer, G., and Morin, P.: The Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica – Strips, Version 4.1,  Harvard Dataverse, V1 [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/X7NDNY" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/X7NDNY</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Jawak, S. D., Kumar, S., Luis, A. J., Bartanwala, M., Tummala, S., and Pandey, A. C.,  Evaluation of Geospatial Tools for Generating Accurate Glacier Velocity Maps from Optical Remote Sensing Data, Proceedings, 2, 341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ecrs-2-05154" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/ecrs-2-05154</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Jezek, K. C.: Glaciological properties of the Antarctic ice sheet from
RADARSAT-1 synthetic aperture radar imagery, Ann. Glaciol., 29, 286–290,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756499781820969" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756499781820969</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Klok, E. L., Greuell, W., and Oerlemans, J.: Temporal and spatial variation
of the surface albedo of Morteratschgletscher, Switzerland, as derived from
12 Landsat images, J. Glaciol., 49, 491–502,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756503781830395" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756503781830395</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kodama, Y., Wendler, G., and Gosink, J.: The effect of blowing snow on
katabatic winds in Antarctica, Ann. Glaciol., 6, 59–62,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/1985AoG6-1-59-62" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/1985AoG6-1-59-62</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Lenaerts, J. T., Medley, B., van den Broeke, M. R., and Wouters, B.:
Observing and modeling ice sheet surface mass balance, Rev. Geophys., 57,
376–420, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Liang, S.: Narrowband to broadband conversions of land surface albedo I:
Algorithms, Remote Sens. Environ., 76, 213–238,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00205-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00205-4</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Mather, K. B.: Further observations on sastrugi, snow dunes and the pattern
of surface winds in Antarctica, Polar Rec., 11, 158–171,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400052888" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400052888</a>, 1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Meredith, M., Sommerkorn, M., Cassotta, S., Derksen, C., Ekaykin, A.,
Hollowed, A., Kofinas, G., Mackintosh, A., Melbourne-Thomas, J., and
Muelbert, M. M. C.: Polar Regions, chap. 3, IPCC Special Report on the
Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.005</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Mouginot, J., Rignot, E., Scheuchl, B., and Millan, R.: Comprehensive annual
ice sheet velocity mapping using Landsat-8, Sentinel-1, and RADARSAT-2 data,
Remote Sens., 9, 364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040364" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040364</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Núñez-González, F. and Martín-Vide, J. P.: Analysis of
antidune migration direction, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 116, F02004,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001761" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001761</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Palm, S. P., Yang, Y., and Kayetha, V.: New Perspectives on Blowing Snow in Antarctica and Implications for Ice Sheet Mass Balance, in: Antarctica – A Key To Global Change, edited by: Kanao, M., Toyokuni, G., and Yamamoto, M., IntechOpen, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81319" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81319</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Parish, T. R. and Bromwich, D. H.: Continental-scale simulation of the
Antarctic katabatic wind regime, J. Climate, 4, 135–146,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1991)004&lt;0135:CSSOTA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1991)004&lt;0135:CSSOTA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Picard, G., Libois, Q., Arnaud, L., Verin, G., and Dumont, M.: Development and calibration of an automatic spectral albedometer to estimate near-surface snow SSA time series, The Cryosphere, 10, 1297–1316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1297-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1297-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Pietroni, I., Argentini, S., and Petenko, I.: One year of surface-based
temperature inversions at Dome C, Antarctica, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol.,
150, 131–151, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Pirazzini, R.: Surface albedo measurements over Antarctic sites in summer,
J. Geophys. Res., 109, D20118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004617" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004617</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Proposito, M., Becagli, S., Castellano, E., Flora, O., Genoni, L., Gragnani,
R., Stenni, B., Traversi, R., Udisti, R., and Frezzotti, M.: Chemical and
isotopic snow variability along the 1998 ITASE traverse from Terra Nova Bay
to Dome C, East Antarctica, Ann. Glaciol., 35, 187–194,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756402781817167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756402781817167</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Prothero, D. R. and Schwab, F.: Sedimentary geology, Macmillan,  ISBN 978-1-4292-3155-8, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Rignot, E., Echelmeyer, K., and Krabill, W.: Penetration depth of
interferometric synthetic-aperture radar signals in snow and ice, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 28, 3501–3504, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012484" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012484</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., and Scheuchl, B.: MEaSUREs InSAR-based Antarctica
ice velocity map, version 2, Boulder CO NASA DAAC Natl. Snow Ice Data Cent. [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/D7GK8F5J8M8R" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/D7GK8F5J8M8R</a>.
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., Scheuchl, B., van den Broeke, M., van Wessem, M.
J., and Morlighem, M.: Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance from
1979–2017, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 1095–1103,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812883116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812883116</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Scambos, T. A., Dutkiewicz, M. J., Wilson, J. C., and Bindschadler, R. A.:
Application of image cross-correlation to the measurement of glacier
velocity using satellite image data, Remote Sens. Environ., 42, 177–186,
1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Scambos, T. A., Frezzotti, M., Haran, T., Bohlander, J., Lenaerts, J. T. M.,
Van Den Broeke, M. R., Jezek, K., Long, D., Urbini, S., Farness, K.,
Neumann, T., Albert, M., and Winther, J.-G.: Extent of low-accumulation
“wind glaze” areas on the East Antarctic plateau: implications for
continental ice mass balance, J. Glaciol., 58, 633–647,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J232" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J232</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Swithinbank, C., Ferrigno, J. G., Williams, R. S., and  Chinn, T. J.: Antarctica, Geological Survey professional paper&thinsp;, 1386-B. U.S. G.P.O., Washington, DC, <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.31210020769210" target="_blank"/> (last access: 13 January 2023), 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Traversa, G. and Fugazza, D.: Evaluation of Anisotropic Correction Factors
for the Calculation of Landsat 8 OLI Albedo on the Ice Sheets, Geogr. Fis. Din.
Quar., 44, 91–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2021.44.8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2021.44.8</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Traversa, G., Fugazza, D., Senese, A., and Diolaiuti, G. A.: Preliminary
results on Antarctic albedo from remote sensing observations, Geogr. Fis. Din.
Quat., 42, 245–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2019.42.14" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2019.42.14</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Traversa, G., Fugazza, D., Senese, A., and Frezzotti, M.: Landsat 8 OLI
Broadband Albedo Validation in Antarctica and Greenland, Remote Sens., 13,
799, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040799" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040799</a>, 2021a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Traversa, G., Fugazza, D., and Frezzotti, M.: Analysis of Megadune Fields in
Antarctica, in: 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium IGARSS, 5513–5516,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9554827" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9554827</a>, 2021b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Van Wessem, J. M., Reijmer, C. H., Morlighem, M., Mouginot, J., Rignot, E.,
Medley, B., Joughin, I., Wouters, B., Depoorter, M. A., Bamber, J. L.,
Lenaerts, J. T. M., Van De Berg, W. J., Van Den Broeke, M. R., and Van
Meijgaard, E.: Improved representation of East Antarctic surface mass
balance in a regional atmospheric climate model, J. Glaciol., 60, 761–770,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG14J051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG14J051</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Vittuari, L., Vincent, C., Frezzotti, M., Mancini, F., Gandolfi, S.,
Bitelli, G., and Capra, A.: Space geodesy as a tool for measuring ice
surface velocity in the Dome C region and along the ITASE traverse, Ann.
Glaciol., 39, 402–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814627" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814627</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Warren, S. G.: Optical properties of snow, Rev. Geophys., 20, 67–89,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i001p00067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i001p00067</a>, 1982.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Wendler, G., André, J. C., Pettré, P., Gosink, J., and Parish, T.:
Katabatic winds in Adélie coast, in: Antarctic Meteorology and Climatology: Studies Based on Automatic Weather Stations, edited by:  Bromwich, D. H. and  Stearns, C. R., 61, 23–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/AR061p0023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/AR061p0023</a>,
1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Zanter, K.: Landsat 8 (L8) data users handbook, Landsat Sci. Off. Website, <a href="https://d9-wret.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets/palladium/production/s3fs-public/atoms/files/LSDS-1574_L8_Data_Users_Handbook-v5.0.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access:13 January 2023),
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
