<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-15-4557-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Surface composition of debris-covered glaciers across the Himalaya
using linear spectral unmixing of Landsat 8 OLI imagery</article-title><alt-title>Surface composition of debris-covered glaciers across the Himalaya</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Surface composition of debris-covered glaciers across the Himalaya}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~E.~Racoviteanu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Racoviteanu</surname><given-names>Adina E.</given-names></name>
          <email>adr18@aber.ac.uk</email><email>racovite@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4954-1871</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Nicholson</surname><given-names>Lindsey</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0430-7950</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Glasser</surname><given-names>Neil F.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8245-2670</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth,
UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric and Cryospheric Sciences, University
of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Adina E. Racoviteanu (adr18@aber.ac.uk, racovite@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>4557</fpage><lpage>4588</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>January</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>August</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>August</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e105">The Himalaya mountain range is characterized by highly glacierized, complex,
dynamic topography. The ablation area of Himalayan glaciers often features a highly
heterogeneous debris mantle comprising ponds, steep and shallow slopes of
various aspects, variable debris thickness, and exposed ice cliffs
associated with differing ice ablation rates. Understanding the composition
of the supraglacial debris cover is essential for a proper understanding of glacier
hydrology and glacier-related hazards. Until recently, efforts to map
debris-covered glaciers from remote sensing focused primarily on glacier
extent rather than surface characteristics and relied on traditional
whole-pixel image classification techniques. Spectral unmixing routines,
rarely used for debris-covered glaciers, allow decomposition of a pixel into
constituting materials, providing a more realistic representation of glacier
surfaces. Here we use linear spectral unmixing of Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images (30 m) to obtain fractional abundance maps of the various supraglacial surfaces
(debris material, clean ice, supraglacial ponds and vegetation) across the
Himalaya around the year 2015. We focus on the debris-covered glacier
extents as defined in the database of global distribution of supraglacial debris cover. The spectrally
unmixed surfaces are subsequently classified to obtain maps of composition
of debris-covered glaciers across sample regions.</p>
    <p id="d1e108">We test the unmixing approach in the Khumbu region of the central Himalaya,
and we evaluate its performance for supraglacial ponds by comparison with
independently mapped ponds from high-resolution Pléiades (2 m) and
PlanetScope imagery (3 m) for sample glaciers in two other regions with
differing topo-climatic conditions. Spectral unmixing applied over the
entire Himalaya mountain range (a supraglacial debris cover area of 2254 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicates that at the end of the ablation season, debris-covered
glacier zones comprised 60.9 % light debris, 23.8 % dark debris, 5.6 % clean ice, 4.5 % supraglacial vegetation, 2.1 % supraglacial
ponds, and small amounts of cloud cover (2 %), with 1.2 % unclassified
areas. The spectral unmixing performed
satisfactorily for the supraglacial pond and vegetation classes (an F score
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both classes) and reasonably for the debris
classes (F score of 0.7).</p>
    <p id="d1e130">Supraglacial ponds were more prevalent in the monsoon-influenced
central-eastern Himalaya (up to 4 % of the debris-covered area) compared
to the monsoon-dry transition zone (only 0.3 %) and in regions with lower
glacier elevations. Climatic controls (higher average temperatures and more
abundant precipitation), coupled with higher glacier thinning rates and
lower average glacier velocities, further favour pond incidence and the
development of supraglacial vegetation. With continued advances in satellite data and
further method refinements, the approach presented here provides avenues
towards achieving large-scale, repeated mapping of supraglacial features.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e142">High relief orogenic belts such as the Himalaya are characterized by
glacierized, complex, dynamic topography and the presence of a continuous
cover of rock debris across the lowest part of the ablation zone of glaciers
(Kirkbride, 2011). Globally, supraglacial debris cover accounts for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–7 % of the total glacierized area (Scherler et al.,
2018; Herreid and Pellicciotti, 2020). In high-mountain environments,<?pagebreak page4558?> high
denudation rates and mass-wasting processes such as rockfalls and
rockslides from the steep valley sides supply abundant rock debris to the
glacier surface (Kirkbride, 2011; Shroder et al., 2000; Evatt et al.,
2015). This results in highly heterogeneous surfaces, consisting of debris
material of various lithologies and grain sizes (sand and silt to boulders),
forming debris cones on variable but mostly shallow slopes. Some of the most
notable features of such surfaces are the supraglacial ponds and exposed ice
cliffs, which have gained interest in recent years for several reasons.
First, they influence the surface energy receipts of the supraglacial debris
surface and the efficiency with which atmospheric energy can be transferred
to the underlying ice and cause glacier ice ablation. While ice ablation
beneath debris cover of more than a few centimetres thick is strongly
reduced (Østrem, 1959; Nicholson and Benn, 2006; Reid and Brock,
2010), ice cliffs and supraglacial ponds are local hot spots for glacier
downwasting due to enhanced energy absorption at the surface of these
features (Ragettli et al., 2016; Miles et al., 2016; Sakai et al., 2002;
Buri et al., 2016; Steiner et al., 2015). Understanding their spatial
distribution is essential for a proper assessment of glacier hydrology,
notably to simulate glacier-wide ablation rates and meltwater production.
Second, the current distribution and fluctuation of proglacial lakes and
supraglacial pond extents is of interest for assessing glacier-related
hazards. Recent studies have reported an increase in pro- and supraglacial
lake area and number in the Himalaya and worldwide as a response to climatic
changes (Shugar et al., 2020; Nie et al., 2017; Shukla et al., 2018).
Some of the supraglacial ponds coalesce and form larger supraglacial lakes,
which may evolve into fully formed proglacial ice or moraine-dammed lakes
(Benn et al., 2012; Thompson et al., 2012), with enhanced potential for
producing hazards such as glacier lake outburst floods (Benn et al.,
2012; Komori, 2008; Richardson and Reynolds, 2000; Reynolds, 2014; GAPHAZ,
2017). Increasing trends of pond development of 17 % to 52 % per year were
reported in the Khumbu region (2000 to 2015) (Watson et al.,
2016), with a 3-fold increase in pond area over three decades (1989 to
2018) (Chand and Watanabe, 2019). Quantifying the number/area of
supraglacial ponds and their evolution (Miles et al., 2017b; Liu et al.,
2015; Watson et al., 2016) is important for assessing which ones might
represent conditioning factors for hazards (Sakai and Fujita,
2010; Reynolds, 2000). Third, understanding the fluctuations of these
surface characteristics, in particular supraglacial vegetation, is important
since vegetation expansion on debris-covered surfaces may indicate the
transition from a debris-covered glacier to a rock glacier in a context of
climate change (Shroder et al., 2000; Jones et al., 2019; Knight et al.,
2019; Monnier and Kinnard, 2017; Kirkbride, 1989).</p>
      <p id="d1e155">Our understanding of the regional variability in glacier mass balance of
both clean and debris-covered glaciers in the Himalaya has improved over the
last years (Dehecq et al., 2019; Brun et al., 2017; Shean et al., 2020),
and the role of glacier morphology in controlling glacier behaviour and
changes has been demonstrated in recent studies (Salerno et al., 2017;
Brun et al., 2019). However, a comprehensive assessment of the surface
geomorphology, supraglacial pond coverage, moraine characteristics and
supraglacial vegetation at various temporal scales is still needed over the
entire Himalaya. Until recently, efforts to map debris-covered glaciers
focused primarily on their extent rather than the surface characteristics.
This was achieved at regional scales using a combination of digital
elevation models (DEMs), various spectral band ratios and terrain curvature
(Shukla et al., 2010; Bolch et al., 2007; Kamp et al., 2011; Bishop et
al., 2001; Paul et al., 2004). Attempts to improve the accuracy of
debris-covered glacier mapping included the use of thermal data, i.e.
temperature differences between debris underlined by glacier ice and the
surrounding non-ice moraines (Taschner and Ranzi, 2002; Bhambri et al.,
2011a; Racoviteanu and Williams, 2012; Alifu et al., 2016) or the use of
glacier velocity (Smith et al., 2015). Considerable improvements
in monitoring capacity due to recent satellite developments and
cloud-computing platforms such as Google Earth Engine allowed exploitation
of large amounts of Landsat and Sentinel-2 data. This has resulted in two
recent global datasets of supraglacial debris (Scherler et al., 2018;
Herreid and Pellicciotti, 2020). While these global datasets represent an
important development in advancing the understanding of the distribution of
debris-covered glaciers at a large scale, they can suffer from the use of
inconsistent methods and different temporal coverage between and/or within
regions. Supraglacial debris in these databases was mapped within the bounds
of the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI)
(Pfeffer et al., 2014), which has varying
analysis dates and accuracy. While these issues were partially mitigated in
a revised dataset based on semi-automated assessments of Landsat imagery
(Herreid and Pellicciotti, 2020), improvements were limited to
glaciers larger than 1 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and were not applied repeatedly at the
global scale.</p>
      <p id="d1e167">Supraglacial ponds and ice cliffs are currently not represented either in
existing supraglacial debris cover datasets or in the updated, publicly
available regional glacier lake inventories (Wang et al., 2020; Shugar et
al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021). The latter tend to focus primarily on the
representation of proglacial lakes and their decadal changes. A database of
supraglacial ponds at several time periods is desirable in order to
complement the existing supraglacial debris and lake databases, as the
distribution of these surface features on debris-covered glacier tongues
remains limited to a handful of glaciers in the Himalaya (Watson et al.,
2016, 2017a, 2018; Steiner et al., 2019). For example,
regional studies on seasonal dynamics and evolution of supraglacial ponds
and ice cliffs tend to be biased towards the well-studied Khumbu and
Langtang areas of Nepal Himalaya (Watson et al., 2016, 2017a; Miles et
al., 2017a, b; Steiner et al., 2019). More studies are needed in other regions
in order to assess the spatial<?pagebreak page4559?> differences in their occurrence as well as to
infer the long-term changes of these features.</p>
      <p id="d1e170">The increased availability of high-resolution (0.5 to 5 m) remotely sensed
data from Pléiades, SPOT and QuickBird satellites, complemented by
RapidEye, PlanetScope and SkySat images from Planet, has offered new
opportunities for characterizing the surface of debris-covered glaciers in
more detail. Supraglacial ponds and ice cliffs have been mapped using a
combination of manual digitization on high-resolution multi-spectral imagery
(1–3 m) or directly on Google Earth (Brun et al., 2018; Watson et al.,
2018, 2017a, 2016; Steiner et al., 2019). Semi-automated
mapping methods include adaptive binary thresholding (Anderson
et al., 2021), band ratios and/or morphological operators (Miles
et al., 2017b; Liu et al., 2015), the normalized difference water index
(NDWI) (Watson et al., 2018; Gardelle et al., 2011; Miles et al., 2017b;
Kneib et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2015; Wessels et al., 2002; Narama et al.,
2017), feature extraction via decision trees and/or object-based image
analysis (OBIA) (Liu et al., 2015; Kraaijenbrink et al., 2016; Panday et
al., 2011), or thermal imagery (Suzuki et al., 2007; Foster et
al., 2012). Other methods include the use of very-high-resolution
topographic models generated using terrestrial structure-from-motion
techniques (Westoby et al., 2014; Rounce et al., 2015; Herreid and
Pellicciotti, 2018; Westoby et al., 2020) or the use of unmanned aerial
vehicle (UAV) data (Kraaijenbrink et al., 2016).
Synthetic aperture radar overcomes the limitations of optical remote sensing
in areas with frequent cloud cover (i.e. the eastern Himalaya) and has
been used to map supraglacial ponds and track their dynamics (e.g. Strozzi et al., 2012; Wangchuk and Bolch, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). Despite
methodological developments, a robust and transferable method for mapping
ice cliffs and ponds in a systematic manner using these high-resolution
datasets does not yet exist, and current methods remain
computationally intensive. Understanding how the surface composition of the
debris-covered tongues upscales in coarser-resolution imagery such as
Landsat is still needed at regional scales. For example, large differences
were shown between UAV-derived ponds and RapidEye-derived ponds in other
studies (Kraaijenbrink et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e174">Even with the increased availability of high-resolution imagery, medium
resolution data from archive Landsat series (30 m spatial resolution) remain
a valuable data source for various regional-scale mapping applications due
to their large swath width (185 km), free accessibility and acquisition time
spanning four decades. One of the limitations in using these medium-resolution data is that most studies rely on traditional whole-pixel
image classification techniques. While these classification techniques are
advantageous for some applications, they do not reveal the constituent
surfaces of image pixels on the ground or their proportions
(Keshava and Mustard, 2002). Spectral unmixing routines, initially
described by Atkinson (1997, 2004) and Foody (2004), allow decomposition of
a given pixel into constituting materials, providing their fractional
abundance and thus generating a more realistic representation of complex
surfaces (Keshava and Mustard, 2002). These have been used in
glaciology to retrieve snow grain size and derive fractional snow-covered
areas from MODIS or Landsat (Painter et al., 2003, 2009; Sirguey
et al., 2009; Veganzones et al., 2014; Rosenthal and Dozier, 1996) and to map
clean glacier areas or snow (Painter et al., 2012; Cortés et al.,
2014), lakes (Zhang et al., 2004), and vegetation (Ettritch et al.,
2018; Song, 2005; Xie et al., 2008). A small number of studies used spectral
unmixing to characterize the mineral composition of debris-covered glaciers
(Casey and Kääb, 2012; Casey et al., 2012); to characterize
lake colour, turbidity and suspended sediments (Matta et al., 2017;
Giardino et al., 2010); and more recently to map ice cliffs
(Kneib et al., 2020). However, the potential of sub-pixel
mapping for debris-covered glaciers has not been fully exploited.</p>
      <p id="d1e177">In this study, we use spectral unmixing of Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) imagery to detect
the surface characteristics of supraglacial debris cover across the
Himalaya, with a particular emphasis on quantifying the supraglacial pond
coverage and vegetation. We first apply and validate the spectral unmixing
in the well-studied Khumbu region of the central Himalaya. Using the spectra
and spectral unmixing parameters derived from the Khumbu region, we infer
the composition of supraglacial debris cover for the entire Himalaya spatial
domain. We validate the pond results by comparing the supraglacial pond
areas derived from spectral unmixing with those obtained using OBIA on
high-resolution imagery for selected glaciers at three different sites. We
use the results to assess the composition of the debris-covered glacier
tongues in regions with differing topo-climatic conditions. We evaluate the
distribution of supraglacial ponds and vegetation across the mountain range
in relation to geographic location, climate, topographic characteristics,
glacier mass balance and surface velocity, and we discuss the potential
relationship between these features and the temporal evolution of these
glaciers.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e182">Himalaya study domain showing the large climatic regions from Bolch
et al. (2019) as dotted black lines and the studied regions labelled as
western, central and eastern Himalaya. The figure also shows the selected domains
across the monsoonal gradient discussed in the text, shown as light-yellow
outlines and labelled as follows: A, Lahaul–Spiti in the monsoon-arid
transition zone of the western Himalaya; B, Manaslu; C, Khumbu and parts
of eastern Tibet in the central Himalaya; D, Bhutan in the eastern
Himalaya. Turquoise boxes represent the pond validation sites: 1, Lahaul–Spiti glaciers; 2, Langtang glaciers; 3, Khumbu glaciers. Image footprints
are the true colour composite of Landsat 8 OLI (bands 4,3,2) scenes used in this
study and described in Table 1.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e193">The reference Khumbu domain in Nepal showing the RapidEye image of 9 October 2015 (bands 5, 4 and 3) and the Pléiades image of 7, 19 and 20 October 2015
(bands 4, 3 and 2) (yellow dotted outline). Vegetation appears in dark
red/brown; ponds display various shades of turquoise. Green dots represent
the ground truth points digitized on the high-resolution images and used for
the accuracy assessment of the linear spectral unmixing.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data sources and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d1e217">Our study area comprises various spatial domains
(Fig. 1). The larger Himalaya domain is defined here
as the region spanning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
92<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 34<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude),
covering areas from the Himachal/Jammu and Kashmir border in the west to the Bhutan
Himalaya in the east (Fig. 1). Glaciers in this area
have been in a state of negative mass balance in the last decades, with
accelerating trends in the 2000 to 2010 decade (Bolch et al., 2019; Brun
et al., 2017; Kääb et al., 2012; Maurer et al., 2019). We developed
our method in the glacierized Khumbu region of Nepal, which we refer to
hereafter as the “Khumbu<?pagebreak page4560?> domain”, although it also includes glaciers north
of the divide (Fig. 2). Glaciers in the Khumbu region have
been well studied in terms of glacier mass balance using the traditional
glaciologic method (Wagnon et al., 2013), the geodetic method (Bolch
et al., 2008; Nuimura et al., 2012; Brun et al., 2017; Bolch et al., 2011;
Rieg et al., 2018), energy balance models (Rounce and McKinney, 2014;
Rounce et al., 2015; Kayastha et al., 2000), debris cover characteristics
(Iwata et al., 1980; Watanabe et al., 1986; Nakawo et al., 1999; Iwata et
al., 2000; Casey et al., 2012; Takeuchi et al., 2000) and surface velocity
(Quincey et al., 2009). Rates of change of the
debris-covered glacier areas in the Khumbu region vary from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1962 to 2005 (Bolch et al., 2008) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1962 to 2011 (Thakuri et al.,
2014). Supraglacial ponds cover <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to 7 % of the
glacierized area in the Khumbu region based on high-resolution Pléiades data
(Watson et al., 2017a; Kneib et al., 2020; Salerno et al., 2012); ice
cliffs cover between 1 % and 9.2 % of the glacier areas (Brun et al.,
2018; Watson et al., 2017a; Kneib et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e331">To examine and highlight regional differences in the composition of the
debris-covered surfaces, we use four sub-regions selected across monsoonal
gradients as defined in the literature, corresponding to the Landsat scenes
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32 919 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) shown on Fig. 1 (Bookhagen and
Burbank, 2010; Thayyen and Gergan, 2010; Barros and Lang, 2003). The Lahaul–Spiti region in the western Himalaya is in the monsoon-arid transition zone,
characterized by monsoon precipitation during the summer and precipitation
from the westerlies in the winter (Thayyen and Gergan, 2010). The
Manaslu and Khumbu regions in the central Himalaya, and the Bhutan region in
the eastern Himalaya, are all under the influence of the Indian summer
monsoon, which brings large amounts of precipitation during the summer
months (June to September) (Barros and Lang, 2003; Bookhagen and
Burbank, 2006) (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e350">To validate the performance of the spectral unmixing as a basis for
estimating pond coverage, we used debris-covered glacier zones at three
validation sites (700–1150 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), selected across the wider Himalaya
domain from the Khumbu,<?pagebreak page4561?> Langtang and Lahaul–Spiti regions (Fig. 1).
Supraglacial ponds on these glaciers were mapped using OBIA methods on
high-resolution imagery (Sect. 2.6).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e366">Satellite imagery used in this study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sensor</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Path/row</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Product</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Date</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Bands</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Cell size (m)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Swath width (km)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Usage</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="13">Landsat 8 OLI</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">137/41</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="13">L1TPT1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25 Nov 2014</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Band 1 Visible</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="13">30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7" morerows="13">185</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="13">Spectral unmixing</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">138/41</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19 Nov 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.43–0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">139/41</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Band 2 Visible</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">140/41</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 Sep 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.450–0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">141/40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Band 3 Visible</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">142/40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 Nov 2016</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.53–0.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">143/40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Band 4 Red</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">144/39</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 Sep 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.64–0.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">145/39</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Band 5 Near-IR</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">146/38</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8 Sep 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.85–0.88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">147/37</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 Sep 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Band 6 SWIR 1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">147/38</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 Sep 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.57–1.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">147/38</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19 Oct 2016</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Band 7 SWIR 2</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.11–2.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="3">Pléiades</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="3">Level 1A</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Blue 430–550 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="3">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7" morerows="3">20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Visual checking of</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Green 490–610 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Landsat endmembers;</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Red 600–720 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">pond validation</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Near IR 750–950 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(Khumbu area)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="3">RapidEye</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="3">Level 3A</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="3">9 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Green 520–590 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="3">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7" morerows="3">77</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Visual checking of</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Red 630–685 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Landsat endmembers</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Red edge 690–730 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(Khumbu area)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Near-IR 760–850 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="3">PlanetScope</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3" morerows="3">Level 3A</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19 Oct 2016</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Blue 455–515 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" morerows="3">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7" morerows="3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Additional pond</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20 Oct 2016</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Green 500–590 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">validation (Lahaul–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Red 590–670 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Spiti area)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Near IR 780–860 nm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Remote sensing data</title>
      <p id="d1e880">The satellite data used for spectral unmixing comprise of 13 Landsat 8 OLI
images covering the Himalaya domain (Fig. 1 and Table 1).
Characteristics of these images are given in Table 1. These were top-of-atmosphere registered, radiometrically calibrated and orthorectified imagery
(level L1TP -T1), available at 30 m spatial resolution in the visible to
short-wave infrared since 2013 (Wulder et al., 2019; USGS, 2015). We
selected scenes from the post-monsoon period only (September to November) in
order to minimize cloud and snow cover occurrence (Bookhagen and
Burbank, 2006). In addition, Landsat scenes across the domain were selected
around the same date as much as possible to minimize seasonal differences in
surface conditions, notably seasonal changes in pond occurrence
(Miles et al., 2017b). All chosen images were acquired around the
same time of the day (05:00 UTC time), with similar solar azimuth
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and zenith angle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
This is important in order to ensure that differences in surface conditions were
minimal. Where the 2015 images had too much cloud or snow, we selected
images for the same season in 2014 and 2016 (Table 1). We acknowledge that
this choice may introduce some uncertainties due to the temporal difference,
which we discuss later (Sect. 4.6). The Landsat 8 OLI scene from the Khumbu domain
(30 September 2015) was chosen as reference for method development and
testing. We also performed a second spectral unmixing on an additional 2016
Landsat 8 OLI scene for the Lahaul–Spiti domain in the western Himalaya (Table 1) in
order to have an analysis that was coincident with the high-resolution data
used to validate the supraglacial pond mapping within this region.</p>
      <p id="d1e919">For calibration and validation of the spectral unmixing products at specific
locations, we used a combination of high-resolution optical imagery from
Pléiades and Planet (Table 1). The Pléiades
1A satellite sensor acquires tri-stereo high-resolution data (0.5 m spatial
resolution in the panchromatic band and 2 m in the multispectral bands, blue
to near-infrared), with 20 km image swath at nadir
(Table 1). Three Pléiades scenes from 2015 (7, 19 and 20 October) covered the north, north-east, and south-east parts of the Khumbu domain (Fig. 1)
(Rieg et al., 2018) and offered the closest match to the date of the
reference Landsat image (30 September 2015); these Pléiades scenes
were cloud-free and<?pagebreak page4562?> snow-free over the debris-covered part of the glaciers.
The scenes were provided as three sets of triplets of primary data (1A) and
were orthorectified in the Leica Photogrammetry Suite in ERDAS Imagine 2013
(ERDAS, 2010) using the Pléiades Rational Polynomial Coefficient
model and the Pléiades DEM (1 m) previously generated using semi-global
matching (Rieg et al., 2018). The individual image scenes were
mosaicked to a single image using nearest neighbour at 2 m spatial
resolution. In addition, a RapidEye level 3A analytic ortho-tile from 9 October 2015 from Planet (Planet Team, 2017) was used in
addition to Pléiades in the Khumbu domain in order to cover a wider region to
better overlap the Landsat scene. This RapidEye scene consists of
orthorectified, surface reflectance data at 5 m spatial resolution and five
multispectral bands, projected to UTM coordinates. A PlanetScope ortho-tile
from 19 October 2016 (3 m spatial resolution, 4 multi-spectral bands) was used
in the Lahaul–Spiti area to validate the ponds resulting from unmixing the 2016
Landsat 8 scene for this region (Table 1). Both
RapidEye and PlanetScope tiles obtained from Planet were mosaicked to single
scenes using nearest neighbour. These have a stated positional accuracy of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, reported as root mean square error, RMSE
(Planet Labs, 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e932">We co-registered all high-resolution images and the corresponding Landsat 8
OLI images using the Co-registration of Optically Sensed Images and
Correlation (COSI-Corr) routine (Leprince et al., 2007)
implemented in ENVI 5.5 Classic (L3Harris Geospatial, Boulder CO). For the
Pléiades image, after co-registration with 20 tie points and a
second-order polynomial transformation (RMSE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3 m), image displacements
were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m in the E/W direction and 0.12 m in the N/S direction. The
Planet RapidEye and PlanetScope scenes were co-registered on the Landsat 8
OLI with 15 and 10 tie points (RMSE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 and 1.6 m, respectively),
yielding offsets of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 1.7 m in the E/W direction and
0.09 to 0.5 m in the N/S direction after co-registration. These offsets were
below the spatial resolution of all scenes (2–5 m).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Atmospheric and topographic corrections</title>
      <p id="d1e977">All Landsat 8 OLI scenes were corrected to minimize atmospheric effects due
to scattering or absorption from atmospheric gases, aerosols and clouds. We
used the open-source Atmospheric and Radiometric Correction of Satellite
Imagery (ARCSI v 3.1.6) routine based on the 6S algorithm (Vermote et
al., 1997). We applied the STDSREF option in ARCSI with the shadow option,
which provided standardized surface reflectance products for all the scenes; deep shadows were masked out as NoData. ARCSI allows for global<?pagebreak page4563?> and
local viewing and solar geometries using physically based illumination and
reflectance corrections based on topographic data (Shepherd
and Dymond, 2003), a specified atmospheric profile, an aerosol optical
thickness (AOT) value and sensor geometry. These settings are important for
minimizing differences in surface conditions among the various scenes. The
AOT value was automatically derived in ARCSI by a numerical inversion of the
surface reflectance on an image basis using the simple dark object
subtraction technique (DOS) from the blue band, yielding an AOT of 0.05 for
the 30 September 2015 Khumbu scene. To validate the performance of the DOS
technique for the atmospheric profile representation in our study area for
this date, we validated the estimated AOT against level 1.5 data at
reference wavelength of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm aerosol size from AERONET
(<uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 20 September 2021)
(Giles et al., 2019) and against
daily forecast global reanalysis of total optical depth at multiple
wavelengths from the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS)
(<uri>https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/catalogue#/</uri>, last access: 20 September 2021). The AOT
values obtained using the DOS method (0.05) were consistent with the ones
calculated from AERONET and CAMS (0.07 and 0.05, respectively). In the
Himalaya, we can generally assume relatively clean atmospheres and thus
consider that low AOT values are reasonable (Peter Bunting, Aberystwyth University,
personal communication, February 2021). Our choice of a constant AOT value in
high environments is in line with findings from other studies (Gillingham
et al., 2013; Matta et al., 2017). Surface topography used for the
atmospheric and topographic corrections was based on the ALOS Global Digital
Surface Model (AW3D30 version 2.2, at 30 m) (JAXA, 2019), constructed
from data acquired from 2006 to 2011. The vertical accuracy of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m in eastern Nepal (Tadono et al., 2014) is
superior to that of Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) DEM (23.5 m,
reported by Mukul et al., 2017), because it contains fewer data
voids and provides better shadow rendering in our area.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Supraglacial debris cover data</title>
      <p id="d1e1016">In this study, we constrained our analysis over supraglacial debris
surfaces, extracted from the database of global distribution of supraglacial
debris cover (Scherler et al., 2018) and referred to hereinafter as the
“SDC”. Debris-covered glacier outlines in this dataset were derived from
Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel-2 data using automated approaches on Google Earth
Engine by excluding clean ice and snow from glacier areas within the limits
of the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI v.6) (RGI Consortium, 2017). Outlines span the period 1998 to 2001 for the central and
eastern Himalaya, the year 2002 for the western Himalaya (monsoon-dry transition
zone) and mostly the year 2010 for glaciers in China. In this study, the
outlines obtained from the SDC dataset required pre-processing because
supraglacial ponds along with other surfaces such as nunataks were
represented as “holes” in this dataset. This caused “NULL geometry”
errors due to unclosed polygons, duplicated vertices, etc. We fixed these
errors in the SDC polygons using the Repair Geometry command in ArcGIS
v10.8., in order to “fill” the holes so that these were included in the
SDC polygons. For the test Khumbu area, we removed supraglacial debris
polygons with an area less than 0.01 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which proved to be erroneous
areas upon visual examination, i.e. sliver polygons or isolated bare land
pixels. Such unwanted small polygons typically result from polygon overlays
and do not represent a physical entity on the ground
(Delafontaine et al., 2009).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Spectral unmixing background and set-up</title>
      <p id="d1e1037">In remote sensing, the reflectance spectrum of any image pixel represents an
average of the materials on the ground, present in various proportions
within that pixel (Keshava and Mustard, 2002). These “mixed
pixels” are a common occurrence and are especially a concern in low- to
medium-resolution imagery, including Landsat. In the case of debris-covered
glacier tongues, constituent materials include various types of rock debris
and/or ice cliffs, supraglacial ponds, and vegetation in various proportions
(Rounce et al., 2018). Spectral unmixing techniques serve to
quantify mixed spectra and to decompose each pixel into its constituent
materials based on their characteristic, distinct spectral signatures. These
materials are referred to as “pure” endmembers (Painter et al., 2009;
Keshava and Mustard, 2002) and are either extracted from the image itself
before unmixing using unsupervised techniques or supplied by the user using
a priori knowledge (Painter et al., 2009; Keshava and Mustard, 2002; Dixit and
Agarwal, 2021). The relationship between the fractional abundance of each
material and its spectra is most often defined as a linear combination of
the spectral reflectance of the distinct constituent materials. This is
implemented as linear mixing models (LMMs), used for example to distinguish
among vegetation, rock or different snow grain sizes
(Painter et al., 2009). LMMs are easy to implement and are
therefore widely used (Dixit and Agarwal, 2021; Keshava and Mustard,
2002). In contrast, nonlinear mixing models take into account multiple
scattering between surfaces and are used in forested areas where canopy
height or particulate mineral mixtures are in close association
(Roberts et al., 1993). They are more realistic but are also
more difficult to implement (Dixit and Agarwal, 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e1040">To yield physically meaningful results, fractions obtained from spectral
unmixing should ideally comply with two major constraints: (a) the
non-negativity (or positivity) constraint (i.e. fractions should not be
negative) and (b) the sum to unity (i.e. for each pixel, fractions should
add up to 1) (Keshava and Mustard, 2002). The non-negativity
condition is recommended because negative reflectance values have no
physical meaning, and the sum-to-unity constraint is recommended when very
dark endmembers such as shadows are targeted or for unmixing radiance or
thermal infrared<?pagebreak page4564?> emissivity. Models that comply with both conditions (called
“fully constrained models”) are difficult to achieve because they require
perfect knowledge of the system, which is rarely feasible. Furthermore,
fully constrained models have been shown to produce unrealistic fractions in
poorly defined areas or areas of low illumination (Cortés
et al., 2014). In this study, we applied a LMM with endmembers extracted
from the Landsat 8 OLI image itself, and we constrained our analysis over
the supraglacial debris cover only to reduce model complexity. We used the
LMM implementation in the ENVI 5.5 software (L3Harris Geospatial, Boulder
CO).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1045">Types of surfaces present in the study area: <bold>(a)</bold> light debris cover
(quartz, feldspar); <bold>(b)</bold> darker schistic debris with ice cliff; <bold>(c)</bold> clean ice
with crevasses in the glacier ablation area; <bold>(d)</bold> graminoid shrub type
vegetation (dry); <bold>(e)</bold> supraglacial lakes with different turbidity levels; <bold>(f)</bold> valley clouds. All photos were taken in the Khumbu region. Photo credit: Adina E. Racoviteanu.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1">
  <label>2.5.1</label><title>Endmember selection and spectral signatures</title>
      <p id="d1e1081">The selection of endmembers is crucial in determining the accuracy and
reliability of the spectral unmixing (Song, 2005; Dixit and Agarwal,
2021), and it requires some trial and error as well as a priori knowledge. We
selected the endmembers within the debris-covered areas in the Khumbu
domain, based on the reference Landsat 8 OLI scene (30 September 2015). Prior to
this, we performed a forward minimum noise fraction transform on the Landsat
scene (Green et al., 1988), which consists of a linear
transformation of the data based on principal component analysis and allowed
us to estimate noise in the bands. All bands had eigenvalues <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, so
we determined the dimensionality of the Landsat data as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We used the
unsupervised pixel purity index routine in ENVI to find pure pixels in
an automated manner. This routine outputs a data cloud where the value of
each point indicates the number of times each pixel was marked as extreme,
thus representing pixels with the highest occurrence in the image. We
optimized the pure pixel extraction using various numbers of iterations
(20 000 to 50 000) with thresholds ranging from 2 to 3 (i.e. 2 to 3
times the noise level in the data) until all pure pixels were detected.
Larger thresholds identify more extreme pixels, but they are less likely to
be pure endmembers. Pure pixels were identified on the Landsat 8 OLI
scene as corresponding to six surface types: clean ice, dry vegetation, clouds,
light debris, dark debris and turbid water (Fig. 3).
These were checked against co-registered Pléiades and RapidEye false
colour composites in the Khumbu region in order to minimize any occurrence of
mixed pixels.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1108"><bold>(a)</bold> Spectral signatures of endmembers extracted from Landsat 8 OLI
bands 1 to 7 (30 September 2015 Khumbu image) after the atmospheric and
topographic corrections; <bold>(b)</bold> field spectra from the debris-covered part of Mer
de Glace Glacier (France) shown for comparison purposes only.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1122">The spectra of the six endmembers (Fig. 4a) were
statistically separable based on the Jeffries–Matusita and transformed
divergence separability measures (Richards, 2013) (values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2.0). We defined both light and dark debris endmembers on the basis of
their spectral differences (Fig. 4a), also noted in
other studies (Casey et al., 2012; Kneib et al., 2020). We visually
compared these spectral signatures with those we acquired previously in the
field on Mer de Glace (French Alps) using an SVC HR-1024 spectrometer (350 to 2500 nm) (Racoviteanu and Arnaud, 2013)
(Fig. 4b), as well as with supraglacial debris
spectra from other papers (Naegeli et al., 2015, 2017;
Casey and Kääb, 2012). To minimize the number of endmembers, we made
several choices:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>(a)</label>
      <p id="d1e1137">We did not consider snow separately from ice.</p></list-item><list-item><label>(b)</label>
      <p id="d1e1141">We assumed the
supraglacial ponds to be mostly of turbid type, i.e. those containing
larger quantities of suspended sediments. We based this choice on results
from Matta et al. (2017), who reported 52 % of ponds in the Himalaya to
have grey waters and 24 % blueish waters; the water spectra in
Fig. 4a corresponds well with field-based spectra
for other turbid lakes in the Khumbu region, such as Chola Lake, reported in their
study.</p></list-item><list-item><label>(c)</label>
      <p id="d1e1145">Based on our field observations of high-altitude vegetation in
the Khumbu region (Fig. 3d), we defined the vegetation
endmember as “dry vegetation”, whose spectral signature (a) corresponds
roughly to the graminoid shrubs or overgrown vegetation with a grass-like
appearance typically found at high altitudes (Wehn et al., 2014).</p></list-item><list-item><label>(d)</label>
      <p id="d1e1149">Prior to the unmixing, we removed deep shadows during the topographic corrections
with ARCSI and assigned them to NoData so they were not considered an
endmember.</p></list-item></list>
We ran the LMM for various combinations and numbers of endmembers
(three to six endmembers) and recorded the model RMSE for each combination. We
examined the residuals (RMSE band) provided from the unmixing to determine
areas of missing or incorrect endmembers; when this contained distinct
features, it indicated poorly defined endmembers. We excluded the endmembers
one by one and ran the LMM until we obtained a residual speckle noise, also known as a “salt and pepper” effect, with no
distinct features, indicating that no endmembers were missing or
misidentified.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS2">
  <label>2.5.2</label><title>Surface classification from fractional maps</title>
      <p id="d1e1161">LMM routines result in a multi-band raster containing pixel-by-pixel
fractional cover values for each class, which ideally range from 0 to 1.
When we obtained negative values for a class, we assumed that the material
was missing and forced these values to zero. Positive values were normalized
by dividing each endmember fraction by the sum of the endmembers, so that
the sum of the fractions of the various materials in each pixel added up to
1. This is a common procedure suggested by previous studies (Rosenthal
and Dozier, 1996; Quintano et al., 2012; Cortés et al., 2014) when the
sum-to-one condition is not satisfied.</p>
      <p id="d1e1164">For further analysis, we require maps of the surfaces rather than just a
numerical value of area, so we classified the 30 m fractional maps by
applying a threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to produce binary maps for each class.
Previous studies used a minimum threshold of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or 0.5; i.e. a pixel was assigned to a class if it contained a fraction of 40 %–50 %
to 100 % of that<?pagebreak page4565?> constituent material (Hall et al., 2002). The
thresholds vary by class, because any pixel contains a mixture of
materials in various proportions (Sect. 3.1). Pixels which satisfy two
different thresholds are categorized as “unclassified”. For the supraglacial
ponds in the Khumbu domain, we defined the water threshold quantitatively based on
comparison of the LMM-derived pond areas against those derived from
Pléiades for seven glaciers (Sect. 2.6), and
we evaluated the sensitivity of the chosen water threshold. For the other
classes, the thresholds were adjusted carefully based on visual
interpretation against the Pléiades and RapidEye images in the Khumbu domain.
The thresholds established for the Khumbu region were applied over the entire
Himalaya domain.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS3">
  <label>2.5.3</label><title>Accuracy assessment</title>
      <p id="d1e1194">The performance of the LMM was assessed both qualitatively (on the basis of
visual interpretation and comparison with surfaces visible on the
high-resolution Pléiades and RapidEye) and quantitatively (using
established measures, i.e. RMSE, fractional value abnormalities and the
residual band output in the LMM) (Gillespie et al., 1990).
To quantitatively assess the ground accuracy of the LMM, we manually
digitized 151 test pixels covering all six classes (10–38 pixels per
class) on false colour composites of the Pléiades and RapidEye images in
the Khumbu domain using a simple random sampling strategy. The reference points
were chosen so that they were well distributed across the Khumbu domain
(Fig. 2) and were taken to represent ground
truth. The predicted class was compared to the ground truth at each<?pagebreak page4566?> pixel
to generate a confusion matrix and to compute the overall accuracy of the
model (percent pixels classified correctly). We also report class-specific
metrics as true positives (number of pixels correctly classified and
found in a class, TP), true negatives (number of correctly classified
pixels that do not belong to a class, TN), false positives (number of
pixels that were incorrectly assigned to a class, FP) and false negatives
(number of pixels that were omitted from a class, FN). We calculated three metrics which are
suitable for multi-class classification routines (Sokolova and
Lapalme, 2009) as follows (Eqs. 1–3):

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>Precision</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>TP</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>FP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>Recall</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>TP</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>FN</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>F score</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>TP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>TP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>FP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>FN</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              Precision measures the agreement between ground data and classified data,
i.e. the probability that a pixel classified as water is indeed water on
the ground. Recall measures the effectiveness of the classifier to identify
a pixel in the class of interest, i.e. the percentage of results correctly
classified by the algorithm. F score balances precision and recall as the
harmonic means of the two and measures the relation between the pixels on
the ground and those classified, i.e. the model accuracy for each class.
For all metrics, a poor score is 0.0 and a perfect score is 1.0.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Validation of supraglacial ponds with high-resolution data</title>
      <p id="d1e1293">We validated the performance of the spectral unmixing for supraglacial pond
areas on the basis of high-resolution imagery for 6 to 7 debris-covered
glacier extents at each of the three sites shown in Fig. 1. For the Khumbu
and Lahaul–Spiti glaciers, supraglacial pond areas were mapped from
Pléiades and PlanetScope imagery, respectively (Table 1), using OBIA
techniques (Blaschke et al., 2014) implemented in the ENVI
Feature Extraction Module (Harris Geospatial, 2017). In
the Khumbu region, the Pléiades images were acquired several weeks apart from
the date of the Landsat scene in some parts of the region (see Table 1), but
we assume minimal lateral expansion between the two dates, as discussed by
Watson et al. (2018). For the Langtang region, we validated
our LMM-derived pond areas with those reported for seven glaciers based on
SPOT7 satellite imagery in Steiner et al. (2019). The OBIA
method used for the Khumbu and Lahaul–Spiti regions consisted in a segmentation-only
extraction workflow on the visible bands of Pléiades and/or PlanetScope,
with an edge algorithm (to delineate the pond segments), a fast lambda
setting (to merge adjacent segments with similar colours and borders) and a
texture kernel size of 3 pixels (suitable for segmenting small areas). The
scale and merge levels were adjusted against colour composites to prevent
over-segmenting and to combine different segments into single ponds. The
resulting polygons were further manually corrected (split, merged or
digitized) for any missing and/or shaded areas beneath ice cliffs as
described in Watson et al. (2017a). Our aim was not to
construct a sophisticated OBIA classification scheme but rather to use the
feature extraction module as a time-saving strategy and to add objectivity to
the manual digitization.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Auxiliary region-wide datasets</title>
      <p id="d1e1304">We explored the dependency of the resulting supraglacial pond cover
incidence on topographic variables: elevation bands above the termini, slope
and aspect of the debris cover areas. These were calculated over the
debris-covered parts of the glaciers on the basis of the AW3D30 DEM (30 m).
Only glacier polygons with area larger than 1 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in a
subset of 408 glaciers, were selected from the SDC database over the Himalaya
domain for an in-depth glacier-by-glacier analysis. The area threshold was
applied in order to remove spurious small bare land patches or isolated
debris pixels present in the SDC database. While the vast majority of
glaciers in the Himalaya are smaller than 1 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, these are mostly clean
glaciers (Racoviteanu et al., 2015). In addition to the
glacier-by-glacier basis analysis, we also binned the topographic variables,
i.e. 100 m elevation, 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> slope and 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> aspect, and summarized
the pond incidence in each bin.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1345">Fractional maps obtained from the LMM routine for a subset of the
Khumbu region. Colour bars show the percentage covered by each type of
material on a pixel-by-pixel basis: <bold>(a)</bold> clean ice; <bold>(b)</bold> turbid water; <bold>(c)</bold> dark
debris; <bold>(d)</bold> light debris; <bold>(e)</bold> clouds; <bold>(f)</bold> dry vegetation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1373">We explored spatial patterns in the pond incidence and supraglacial
vegetation with respect to regional climate gradients, average glacier mass
balance and average surface velocity. Climate data (total precipitation and
average temperature) were obtained from ERA5-Land, which provides gridded
monthly average means at 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of land
surface properties
(Muñoz-Sabater, 2019). Gridded glacier elevation change data at
30 m resolution for the period 2000–2019 were obtained from Shean et al. (2020). Glacier surface velocities for the period 2013–2015 based on Landsat data were obtained from Dehecq et al. (2015).
All topo-climatic variables were binned and averaged over a
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid as in other studies (e.g. Brun et al., 2017; Dehecq et al., 2019) to explore the
topo-climatic controls on pond and vegetation incidence.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1430">Comparison of the Landsat sub-pixel classified fractional ponds
(dark blue) with OBIA pond outlines (light blue) based on high-resolution
data for the termini of three glaciers: <bold>(a)</bold> Ngozumpa Glacier, <bold>(b)</bold> Khumbu
Glacier and <bold>(c)</bold> Bara Shigri Glacier. The background images are colour
composites (bands 1,2,3) of Pléiades imagery <bold>(a, b)</bold> and PlanetScope imagery <bold>(c)</bold>. Glacier outlines are from the SDC dataset (Scherler et al.,
2018).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Fractional maps</title>
      <p id="d1e1470">Here we present results of the unconstrained LMM, because this had a lower
RMSE (0.6 %) compared to the partially constrained model run (RMSE of 1.5 %). The normalized fractional maps of the six surface types are presented
in Fig. 5; fractional values ranged from 0.004 to 1.
Fractional water values greater than 0.5 correspond to supraglacial ponds,
visible for example at the termini of Ngozumpa and Khumbu glaciers
(Fig. 6a and b). Light debris and dark debris were<?pagebreak page4567?> identified
with a threshold of 0.25 and 0.40, respectively, defined visually on the
basis of the Pléiades image. Dry vegetation patches generally exhibited
pixel fractions greater than 0.65. Pixels with abnormally high positive
fractional vegetation values were found in areas of healthy green vegetation
and/or bare terrain, which should not be part of the debris-covered tongues,
as will be discussed later (Sect. 4.5). Cloud
pixels display fractional values greater than 0.45, although some pixels
were mixed with debris, particularly at cloud shadow areas. For clean ice,
fractional values were rather low (0.20) and ranged from 0 (areas which
might have some degree of dirty, dark ice with a lower albedo) to 1 (small
number of clean ice pixels found in the upper areas of supraglacial debris).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Accuracy of the LMM-based classification for the Khumbu region</title>
      <p id="d1e1481">Accuracy measures presented in Table 2 for the
Khumbu domain show that errors were not evenly distributed among classes.
For the water and vegetation classes, recall score was 0.83 to 0.84,
respectively, with a precision of 0.94 and 0.93, respectively
(Table 2). For these classes, the LMM achieved a
balance of precision and recall metrics, with a high F score of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicating an accurate model. For the debris classes,
the model was reasonable but not outstanding, with an F score of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lower precision score for dark debris (0.56)
compared to light debris (0.72) (Table 2). This
suggests that in the case of dark debris, the LMM model was less accurate
than light debris, because pixels from other classes (clean ice, water and
light debris) got mistakenly assigned to this class. Clouds were classified
with low precision and low recall scores (F score of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which means that the LMM performed relatively poorly for this class and it
also missed 50 % of the cloud pixels. There was confusion between clean
ice and cloud pixels, i.e. clean ice pixels were mistakenly included in the
cloud class. Clean ice was the most poorly classified, with a recall score
close to 0 and F score of 0.13; one ice pixel was correctly identified, but
other surfaces were confounded with ice. We attribute this to the poorly
defined ice class in the model data (i.e. limited number of pure ice
pixels used to extract the spectral signature). Based on these measures, we
note that overall the LMM most accurately classified the water and
vegetation classes, with reasonable performance for the light debris class
but poor performance for clean ice and clouds. The overall accuracy of the
LMM-based classification of the six surfaces was 75 %; however, this is a
rather coarse metric, and it does not indicate the specific performance of
the model for each class, so we do not use this here as evaluation of the
accuracy.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1517">Summary of accuracy metrics per class for the Khumbu region,
calculated based on the confusion matrix, including true positives (TP),
false positives (FP), false negatives (FN) and true negatives (TN).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Class</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">FP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">FN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">TN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Recall</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Precision</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">F score</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clean ice</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">112</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Water (turbid)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Debris (dark)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Debris (light)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.71</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clouds</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vegetation (dry)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page4568?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Supraglacial pond thresholds and validation</title>
      <p id="d1e1753">The sensitivity analysis of the pond areas obtained from LMM fractional maps
with various thresholds (Table 3) indicates that
there was up to 40 % variability in total pond area when compared to
Pléiades-based ponds, depending on the glacier. A threshold of 0.5
applied to the water class (fractional water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supraglacial ponds) yielded the best agreement with the total pond areas for
the seven glaciers, obtained from OBIA mapping on the Pléiades image
(1.0 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to 1.1 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the total coverage, respectively,
or a 9 % difference) (Table 4). For the Khumbu
Glacier, LMM with a threshold of 0.5 yielded a pond area of 0.20 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
versus 0.23 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from Pléiades (Table 4),
which is in agreement with the area reported by Watson et al. (2017b) (0.24 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) using the same Pléiades image
(7 October 2015).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1817">Sensitivity analysis of the supraglacial pond area for the seven
reference glaciers in the Khumbu domain, obtained using various thresholds
applied to the fractional water maps.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glacier</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">Surface area (km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fractional</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fractional</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fractional</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">water</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Khumbu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lhotse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lhotse Nup</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ngozumpa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nuptse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Changri Nup</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gaunara</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total pond coverage</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2048">Validation of the Landsat spectral unmixing for supraglacial pond
coverage at selected glaciers at three sites across the Himalaya domain,
shown in Fig. 1.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region/</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Debris area</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pond area</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">%</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Date</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Pond area</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">%</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Date</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">glacier name</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">coverage</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">coverage</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Khumbu</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Landsat 8 spectral unmixing </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">Pléiades OBIA  </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Khumbu</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="7">30 Sep 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="7">7 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lhotse</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.90</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.70</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lhotse Nup</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.60</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ngozumpa</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.59</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.00</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nuptse</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.90</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.03</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.90</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.00</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Changri Nup &amp; Shar</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.50</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gaunara</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.70</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.04</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.24</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Langtang</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Landsat 8 spectral unmixing </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">SPOT 7 manual digitization (from Steiner et al., 2019) </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lirung</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.44</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="6">7 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="6">6 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ghanna</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.69</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.70</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Langshisha</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.46</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.60</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Langtang</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.17</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.92</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.18</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.00</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Salbhachum</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.44</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.00</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lirung</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.44</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.50</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.17</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.64</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.86</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lahaul–Spiti</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Landsat 8 spectral unmixing </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">PlanetScope OBIA </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Yichu</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.002</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="7">19 Oct 2016</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.001</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8" morerows="7">19 Oct 2016</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dibi Ka</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.004</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.009</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.000</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bara Shigri</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.126</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.027</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.076</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.016</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sara Umga</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.007</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.001</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.012</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.001</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G077666E32079N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.000</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G077559E32106N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.000</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G077698E32078N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.001</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.000</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.31</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2731">In the Lahaul–Spiti region, for the seven glaciers we investigated, LMM
yielded a total pond area of 0.14 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.31 % of the total
debris-covered area of the glaciers). The area mapped from PlanetScope image
from the same date (19 October 2016) using OBIA yielded 0.10 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.22 % of the debris-covered area) (Table 4).</p>
      <p id="d1e2752">In the Langtang region, for the six glaciers investigated in Steiner et al. (2019), our LMM-derived pond areas yielded a total of 0.17 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> pond area (0.64 % of the debris-covered<?pagebreak page4569?> area). Steiner et al. (2019) obtained a total pond area of 0.21 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.86 % of
the debris-covered area) for the same glaciers based on manual digitization
by multiple analysts from SPOT7 data for the same date as the Landsat. LMM
underestimated the pond area by 0.05 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (19 %), which is within
the uncertainty range (21 %) reported for the ponds in the Langtang area
by Steiner et al. (2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e2782">Visually, in the Khumbu region, the spectrally unmixed pond pixels correspond well with the
validation dataset (Fig. 6a and b), although there is a difference in the representation of
the pond surfaces due to the spatial resolution (30 m Landsat vs. 2 m
Pléiades). Similarly, in the Lahaul–Spiti region,
locations of the supraglacial ponds correspond well between LMM and
PlanetScope on Bara Shigri Glacier (Fig. 6c), but
the small ponds are not identified using the water threshold of 0.5, which
assumes that more than 50 % of the pixel area is covered by water.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2787">Comparison of the fractional ponds from this study with two recent
lake datasets based on 2015 Landsat imagery (same as our study) for the
Spillway Lake at the terminus of Ngozumpa Glacier and the Gokyo Lakes, with
the Landsat colour composite of bands 5, 4 and 3 overlaid on shaded relief.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2798">Composition of debris-covered glacier tongues shown for two of the
domains showing glaciers discussed in the text: <bold>(a)</bold> subset of the Khumbu
domain (NG: Ngozumpa Glacier; GA: Gaunara Glacier; CN: Changri Nup
Glacier; CS: Changri Shar Glacier; KH: Khumbu Glacier; N: Nuptse Glacier;
LN: Lhotse Nup Glacier; L: Lhotse Glacier; KA: Kangshung Glacier; KZ:
Kazhenpu Glacier; LA: Labeilang Glacier) and <bold>(b)</bold> subset of the Lahaul–Spiti
area (BS: Bara Shigri Glacier; S: Sara Umga Glacier; Y: Yichu Glacier; DK: Dibi Ka Glacier). Surfaces are shown on shaded relief from the
AW3D30 DEM, with debris-covered glacier extents from the SDC dataset (Scherler et al.,
2018). Note that the extent of Changri Nup incorrectly includes the inactive
part of the glacier in this global dataset.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2816">Ice pixels detected by the LMM at the surface of Ngozumpa Glacier in
the Khumbu region. <bold>(a)</bold> Landsat 8 OLI false colour composite bands 5, 4, 3 and
unmixing results for ice, water and vegetation classes only; <bold>(b)</bold> Pléiades
colour composite (bands 4, 3, 2) shown for comparison, with vegetation shown
as red shades. Ice cliffs display the typical crescent moon shape. White
pixels in panel <bold>(a)</bold> correspond to NoData in areas of topographic shadows,
resulting from the topographic correction routine.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Application to regional non-glacier lake databases</title>
      <p id="d1e2842">While supraglacial ponds are the focus of this study, we mention that LMMs
can also be parameterized to map other lakes, by masking the debris-covered
glacier areas and replacing the turbid water endmember with the clear water
endmember, which has a lower spectral signature (Fig. 4a). This is beyond the purpose of this study, but we provide an
illustration of such an output for the terminus of Ngozumpa Glacier
in Fig. 7. We present the ponds and lakes on the
debris cover and outside it for comparison with two existing glacial lake
databases constructed from the same year (2015 Landsat): the HMA v.1 lake
dataset, derived using a normalized difference water index
(Shugar et al., 2020), and HI-MAG constructed using a modified
NDWI and manual corrections (Chen et al., 2021). A
comparison with other global databases such as the Global Surface Water
dataset (Pekel et al., 2016) was not undertaken here, as this has
already been shown to underestimate the water occurrence over most of the
Himalaya by Chen et al. (2021). With regards to HMA
v.1 and HI-MAG datasets, Fig. 7 shows that the lake<?pagebreak page4570?> outlines obtained from
spectral unmixing for the supra-glacier ponds at the terminus of Ngozumpa
Glacier and the Gokyo Lakes outside the glaciers are outperforming
both of the existing databases in this area. Our lake extents are consistent
with the HMA v.1 lake extents outside debris cover
(Fig. 7), and the surface area estimates agree quite
well; for example, we calculated a difference of 5 % in the summed pond
area over the three Gokyo Lakes (1.15 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in our estimates vs. 1.09 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in HMA v.1). The slight underestimate in the latter is due to
simplification of the raster edges in the vector conversion process, visible
in the lake extents. With regards to supraglacial ponds, for example
Spillway Lake at the terminus of Ngozumpa Glacier, our spectral unmixing
technique maps most of these lakes, while both HMA v.1 and the HI-MAG
datasets fail to detect all the supraglacial ponds. The HI-MAG detects more
of the surface of Spillway Lake compared to HMA v.1, but the outlines are
simplified and lack precision with respect to Landsat pixels
(Fig. 7). We did not simplify the lake and pond
polygons, as this can introduce significant area errors.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2866">Composition of the seven debris-covered tongues in the Khumbu region, expressed
as percent coverage of each material with respect to the debris-covered
zones of each glacier.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glacier</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Clean ice (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Water turbid (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Debris dark (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Debris light (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Cloud (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Vegetation dry (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Khumbu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">79.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lhotse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">91.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lhotse Nup</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">69.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ngozumpa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nuptse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">95.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Changri Nup</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">76.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gaunara</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">65.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">43.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Composition of the debris-covered glacier tongues: glacier to regional scale</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS1">
  <label>3.5.1</label><title>Khumbu domain</title>
      <p id="d1e3137">For the seven debris-covered glacier tongues in the Khumbu domain
(Fig. 8a), the most prevalent materials detected
using the LMM were dark and light debris, with an average of 53.7 % and
43.6 % of the supraglacial debris area, respectively
(Table 5). The dark and light debris areas exhibit
variable distribution patterns by glacier. For example, the debris-covered
tongue of Nuptse Glacier in the Khumbu region is mostly covered by light debris
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of its area),<?pagebreak page4571?> while the opposite is true for Lhotse
Glacier, which is mostly composed of dark debris (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)
(Table 5). Other glaciers in the eastern part of
the Khumbu domain, i.e. Kangshung Glacier, exhibit alternating bands of light and dark
debris, where darker bands represent medial moraines
(Fig. 8a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e3162">Examples of the supraglacial vegetation maps for two glaciers in
the eastern Himalaya: <bold>(a)</bold> Kazhenpu Glacier; <bold>(b)</bold> Labeilang Glacier. Left panels
show the Landsat 8 OLI colour composite (bands 5, 4, 3) draped onto a shaded
relief map from the ALOS DEM. Middle panels show fractional vegetation, and
black arrows point to identified errors (bare land and/or healthy
vegetation) in the SDC dataset. Right panels show the pixels containing more
than 65 % fractional vegetation.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3177">Exposed ice was detected in small quantities in the Khumbu region, ranging from 0.2 % (Lhotse) to 1.4 % (Changri Nup) with an average of 0.6 % of the
debris-covered areas (Table 5 and
Fig. 9). Patches of supraglacial vegetation ranged
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Lhotse Nup Glacier) to 1.6 % (Gaunara
Glacier), with an average of 0.5 % over the seven tongues
(Table 5). Vegetation patches were found for several
pixels corresponding to the lateral moraine of Ngozumpa Glacier, or larger
patches at the terminus of Labeilang and Kazhenpu glaciers in China
(Figs. 8 and 10). The
supraglacial pond area in the Khumbu region in 2015 ranged from 0.9 % (Lhotse
and Nuptse glaciers) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the debris-covered area
(Ngozumpa and Khumbu glaciers), with an average of 1.6 % over the seven
debris-covered glacier tongues and glacier-by-glacier variability
(Table 5). The larger water coverage for Ngozumpa
and Khumbu glaciers is consistent with the presence of large supraglacial
ponds at the terminus of these two glaciers shown on Fig. 6.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Table 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3204">Composition of the debris-covered glaciers over the entire Himalaya
domain and four selected sub-domains along the monsoonal gradient and for
the entire domain, listed from west to east. Debris-covered glacier areas
are based on the SDC dataset (Scherler et al., 2018).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Lahaul–Spiti </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Manaslu </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">Khumbu </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">Bhutan </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="center">Entire domain </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">%</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clean ice</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">126.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clouds</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">45.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Debris (dark)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">148.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">48.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">15.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">535.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">23.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Debris (light)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">151.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">74.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">68.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">130.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">43.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">83.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">64.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1371.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">60.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Turbid water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">47.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vegetation (dry)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">101.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">4.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unclassified</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">26.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total debris cover</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">204</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">303</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">130</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2253</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e3674">Distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> supraglacial pond coverage and <bold>(b)</bold> supraglacial
vegetation, expressed as percent of each debris-covered area on a
glacier-by-glacier basis for the 408 sampled glaciers.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS2">
  <label>3.5.2</label><title>Himalaya domain</title>
      <?pagebreak page4573?><p id="d1e3697">Here we consider patterns across the whole analysed mountain range and also
compare and contrast conditions in the four regions highlighted in Fig. 1.
Light debris is prevalent over the entire Himalayan domain, comprising
almost 3 times the extent of dark debris (60.9 % vs. 23.8 %,
respectively; Table 6). There is a slight regional variability in the occurrence of
light debris, but all regions exhibit similar patterns in terms of the
proportion of light and dark debris (Table 6).
Glaciers in the western part of the Himalaya are mostly composed of
supraglacial light debris  (Fig. 8b and Table 6), which presumably reflects the nature of the
underlying bedrock geology here (Searle et
al., 1987).</p>
      <p id="d1e3700">We detected a higher percent coverage of clean ice/snow within the
debris-covered area for the entire range (5.6 % of the debris) with
respect to the reference Khumbu domain (0.6 % on average)
(Table 6). At the date of the analysis (September to
October 2015), some of the debris-covered glaciers in the eastern part
(Bhutan) exhibited snow on the upper parts of the supraglacial debris,
perhaps due to early snowfalls common in this area at this time of the year.</p>
      <p id="d1e3703">Cloud coverage amounted to 45 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.0 % of the debris-covered area)
over the entire range, with less coverage in the Lahaul–Spiti and Khumbu regions (1.6 % and 0.6 %, respectively) compared to the Bhutan domain (6 %).</p>
      <p id="d1e3715">Supraglacial vegetation covered a total of 4.5 % of the debris-covered
parts of glaciers over the Himalaya domain, with less coverage in the
western part (Lahaul–Spiti, 1.6 % of the debris cover) than in the
central and eastern Himalaya regions (Khumbu and Bhutan domains, at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). We show examples of the vegetation maps obtained
from the LMM on Kazhenpu Glacier in China in Fig. 10a. On other glaciers,
such as Labeilang Glacier (Fig. 10b), these values
might be slightly overestimated because the SDC dataset included patches of
healthy vegetation as part of the debris cover.</p>
      <p id="d1e3729">The supraglacial pond dataset over the Himalaya domain consists of a total
of 18 325 ponds ranging in area from 0.0009 to 0.002 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Ponds
accounted for an area of 47 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.1 % of the total supraglacial
debris cover), with marked regional variability among western Himalaya
(Lahaul–Spiti: 0.3 % of the supraglacial debris), central<?pagebreak page4574?> Himalaya
(Khumbu: 1.6 % and Manaslu: 2.6 %) and eastern Himalaya (Bhutan: 4.9 %) (Table 6).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Glacier-by-glacier pond and vegetation coverage</title>
      <p id="d1e3759">The 408 debris-covered glacier tongues selected from the SDC dataset for the
in-depth analysis (Sect. 2.7) ranged in area from 1 to 37 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an average area of 3.9 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a mean slope of
12.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The supraglacial pond and vegetation coverage of
these glaciers shows heterogeneous patterns (Fig. 11a and b). Both supraglacial ponds and vegetation cover a relatively small
percent of the debris-covered glacier areas in the western Himalaya (0 % to
2.5 %) compared to the central and eastern parts. We note some clusters
of higher percentage occurrence of both ponds and vegetation in these two
regions (7.5 %–10 % for ponds and 20 %–40 % for vegetation,
respectively) (Fig. 11a and b). The glacier-by-glacier
analysis of pond coverage with respect to minimum debris-covered glacier
elevation did not yield a clear trend, suggesting that ponds do not occur
necessarily on glaciers situated at lower altitudes. Similarly, supraglacial
vegetation coverage did not display significant dependencies on either
average slope or minimum elevation of the debris-covered tongues.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e3791">Plots of supraglacial pond coverage summarized over <bold>(a)</bold> elevation
bands expressed as percent above terminus, <bold>(b)</bold> slope expressed as 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> bins
and <bold>(c)</bold> glacier aspect expressed as 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> bins.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3827">The analysis of pond coverage per 100 m elevation bands over the entire
range, however, shows clearer patterns than the glacier-by-glacier results: 77 % of the pond area coverage occurs within 10 % elevation from the
glacier termini, and then pond density decreases exponentially towards the
upper part of the debris-covered tongues (0.1 % of pond coverage at 75 % elevation upwards from the termini) (Fig. 12a). We note from Fig. 12a
that the largest concentration of ponds does not occur directly at the
glacier termini but rather within 2 % of the elevation from the terminus,
i.e. within 100 m above the minimum elevation. The exponential fit shown in
Fig. 12a could have useful predictive power but misses the peak pond
coverage that is typically found near the glacier terminus, where ponds
coalesce into large terminal lakes. This implies that the exponential fit is
useful for capturing the ponds perched found above the terminus on thicker
ice but likely does not capture the water level representing the
hydrological base level in the depressions found in thinner ice at the
terminus (Benn et al., 2012; Miles et al., 2017a).</p>
      <p id="d1e3831">The analysis of pond incidence with regards to slope (Fig. 12b) shows that 38 % of the total pond area occurs on 0 to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> slope bins,
with the maximum pond area coverage found at slope bins averaging 4 to
6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (9 % of the pond area). The pond incidence increases
initially and then drops on slopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 12b),
which is to be expected because at steeper slopes meltwater can drain away
(Reynolds, 2000). This is consistent with findings from a previous
study (Scherler et al., 2011), which found that slope areas with
gradients less than 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were associated with stagnant ice at
the terminus regions of debris-covered glaciers over the Himalaya. With
respect to glacier aspect, we found that the maximum pond coverage occurs on
slopes with an eastern orientation (22.5 to 67.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 15.6 % of the pond area) and south-eastern orientation (67.5–112.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 14.2 % of the pond area), with less pond incidence (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) on northern-facing slopes (Fig. 12c). Although the differences in pond
incidence in the different aspect bands are only within 4 %, this seems
to support the fact that southern- and eastern-facing slopes receive more
insolation, thus favouring ice melt and formation of ponds.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page4575?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <label>3.7</label><title>Supraglacial pond and vegetation distribution over the large domain</title>
      <p id="d1e3916">Here we present the large-scale patterns of pond and vegetation occurrence
on debris-covered glacier tongues over the Himalaya domain with respect to
topo-climatic variables averaged and binned at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">111</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) (Fig. 13).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e3951">Plots of <bold>(a)</bold> LMM-derived ponds, <bold>(b)</bold> LMM-derived vegetation, <bold>(c)</bold> debris cover expressed as percent of the glacierized area, <bold>(d)</bold> minimum elevation
of debris cover, <bold>(e)</bold> thickness change trends for 2000–2018 from Shean et al. (2020), <bold>(f)</bold> average velocity trends for 2013–2015 from Dehecq et al. (2015), <bold>(g)</bold> average temperature from ERA5-Land (October 2015) and <bold>(h)</bold> total precipitation from ERA5-Land
(October 2015). All variables were averaged over the glacierized
areas and gridded over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cells.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Table 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4008">Correlation matrix for topo-climatic and geographic controls on pond
and vegetation coverage based on Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value. Blue shades represent
positive correlations and red shades represent negative correlations.
“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>” denotes significant correlations at the 99 %
confidence level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>”
denotes significant correlations at the 95 % confidence level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>” denotes significant correlations at the 90 %
confidence level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
  <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/4557/2021/tc-15-4557-2021-t07.png"/>
</table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4111">Binned supraglacial ponds and vegetation over the Himalaya domain exhibit
clear spatial patterns (Fig. 13a and b). With regards to
geographical location, the pond coverage in the western Himalaya is rather
homogenous (ranging from 0.1 % to 1.5 % of the debris-covered areas) and is
more pronounced and variable in the eastern Himalaya (2.4 % to 4.3 % of the
debris-covered area) (Fig. 13a). Pond incidence exhibits a strong positive
correlation with longitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a strong
negative correlation with latitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Table 7). Supraglacial vegetation incidence is less
pronounced in the north-western part of the domain (Fig. 13b) and increases
significantly with longitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and decreases
with latitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Table 7). The surface trend analysis of pond and supraglacial vegetation
incidence shows that these increase in the east–west direction at the rate
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % per degree longitude, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e4235">Pond occurrence is positively correlated with average temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and with precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Furthermore, pond occurrence is negatively correlated with glacier
thickness change (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Table 7). We did not find significant correlations
of pond and vegetation occurrence with supraglacial debris cover, glacier
termini elevation or average glacier velocity (Table 7). Supraglacial vegetation had a weak non-significant positive correlation
with precipitation and termini elevation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Controls on mountain-range-scale supraglacial pond and vegetation
distribution</title>
      <p id="d1e4329">The topo-climatic conditions for the occurrence of supraglacial ponds on the
surface of debris-covered glaciers have been addressed in previous studies
(e.g. Sakai, 2012; Sakai and Fujita, 2010), but supraglacial
vegetation and its controls have rarely been addressed. Previous studies
showed that both ponds and vegetation tend to develop on stagnant, low-angle
slopes of the debris-covered tongues (Sakai and Fujita, 2010; Reynolds,
2000; Quincey et al., 2007). Furthermore, we would expect to find more ponds
and lakes on debris-covered glaciers situated at lower
elevations, which experience increased temperature and therefore enhanced
surface melt. However, our analysis on a glacier-by-glacier basis did not yield
significant spatial trends in pond and vegetation occurrence with respect to
these controls. This implies that at the mountain-range scale, the
distribution of supraglacial features may be governed by more complex
factors, such as geomorphologic, glaciologic and climatic patterns. Here we
discuss the occurrence of supraglacial ponds and vegetation in light of
regional topo-climatic conditions averaged over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cells.</p>
      <p id="d1e4352">A first observation is that supraglacial debris covers a larger part of the
glacierized areas in the central and eastern Himalaya compared to the
western extremities (Fig. 13c). Supraglacial debris decreases linearly from
the south-west to north-east, and it is significantly correlated with latitude
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). At the same time, the elevation of the
debris-covered glacier termini increases northwards towards the Tibetan
Plateau (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">354</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m per degree latitude) and to a lesser extent from west to
east (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">114</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m per degree longitude) (Fig. 13d, Table 7). The increasing
trends in both pond and vegetation coverage towards the eastern Himalaya
noted earlier (Fig. 13a, b) are consistent with the presence of lower glacier
termini and higher rates of debris in the eastern part compared to the
western part. Overall, debris-covered glacier tongues descend to lower
elevations in the central and eastern Himalaya regions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 4400 m) compared to the western part (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
4900 m). Our results show that glacier termini elevation exhibits only a
very weak negative control on pond occurrence (Table 7) and a
slightly larger but not significant control on vegetation coverage. It
appears that the elevations at which supraglacial debris is found do not
significantly influence pond occurrence vegetation growth on these tongues.</p>
      <p id="d1e4420">Development of supraglacial vegetation (mostly shrubs) has been noted on
stagnant, thick debris-covered tongues in various areas of the world (Xie
et al., 2020; Tampucci et al., 2016). Increasing trends in supraglacial
vegetation in other glacierized areas such as the Alps are a consequence of
climatic change (Vezzola et al., 2016). As supraglacial vegetation
typically only develops on stagnant surfaces that are no longer undergoing
substantial gravitational reworking, its presence may also constitute an
indication of glacier inactivity and later stages of decay. The increased
vegetation occurrence towards the eastern Himalaya observed in
this study (Fig. 13b) coincides with a clear west-to-east pattern in negative glacier
surface elevation changes based on Shean's et al. (2020) dataset (Fig. 13e).
Glacier surface changes become increasingly more negative towards the east
at the rate of 0.02 m per degree longitude. Spatial patterns in glacier
surface thinning and the resulting mass balance is consistent with the
eastward increase in both pond and vegetation incidence observed in this
study. In this study, however, the direct dependence of supraglacial
vegetation on glacier thinning patterns is rather weak (Table 7).</p>
      <p id="d1e4423">In addition, the eastward decrease in average glacier velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per degree longitude and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per degree latitude),
based on the trend analysis of 2013–2015 datasets from Dehecq et al. (2015)
(Fig. 13f), shows a tendency for stagnating debris-covered glacier tongues
towards the north and towards the east. Stagnant glaciers were reported for
the northern parts of the central Himalaya (Scherler et al., 2011)
and were attributed to topographic differences, i.e. low slope angles on
the northern slopes of the range promoting development of stagnant ice. Such
patterns are in contrast with more rugged, steeper terrain of the southern
slopes, which favours more dynamic glacier environments (Scherler et
al., 2011). The stagnating trends coupled with a higher percentage of
supraglacial debris correlate with the higher incidence of vegetation
towards the east (Fig. 13b), supporting the idea that debris cover of
sufficient<?pagebreak page4577?> stability favours plant colonization (Fickert et
al., 2007). Such patterns point to a potential transition of debris-covered
glaciers in certain areas towards vegetated glaciers as noted in other
studies (Fickert et al., 2007). It has been noted in recent
studies that supraglacial ponds can enhance local ablation rates by up to
3 times (Brun et al., 2016; Miles et al., 2018; Irvine-Fynn et al.,
2017). The slightly more negative mass balances and lower surface velocities
towards the east may indicate the transition of debris-covered glaciers to
inactive debris-covered glacier tongues or rock glaciers in this part of the
Himalaya (Jones et al., 2019; Monnier and Kinnard, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e4471">Climate factors (i.e. higher temperatures and precipitation) induce more
dynamic environments and could favour increased surface melt and pond
formation (Herreid and Pellicciotti, 2020). In the case of the
Himalaya, we observed a significant south-west-to-north-east
decreasing trend in gridded average temperatures, with a stronger decrease
in the south-to-north direction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per degree
latitude) (Fig. 13g and Table 7). Total gridded precipitation for the same
month increases in the eastern direction at the rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm per degree
latitude and significantly decreases towards the drier, colder regions of
the Tibetan Plateau with a stronger gradient northward (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm per degree
latitude) (Fig. 13h and Table 7). On the contrary, the warmer and wetter
areas of the eastern Himalaya seem to favour higher pond coverage, as also
suggested in other studies (Herreid and Pellicciotti, 2020). At larger
scales, it has been shown that certain conditions related to topography and
lithology could offset this dependency, but at the range of the Himalaya,
this climatic dependency holds. Climatic conditions and glacier
characteristics in the western Himalaya are more similar to those in the
Karakoram, where glaciers have undergone less shrinkage (Brun et al.,
2017; Kääb et al., 2012; Gardelle et al., 2013), than those in the
central and eastern, monsoon-influenced parts of the Himalaya, which exhibit
higher temperatures and larger precipitation amounts.</p>
      <p id="d1e4513">The controls on debris-covered glacier surface evolution are a complex
combination of the cumulative debris-supply, mass-balance condition, debris
cover expansion, stagnation and total lowering. Studies have noted that
surface types are related to the evolutionary stage of a debris-covered
glacier (Thompson et al., 2016), in that debris thickness
variability, local topography, degree of downwasting, and glacier tongue
slope are all potentially, at least partially, related to the time lapsed
since debris cover formation (Sakai and Fujita, 2010;
Nicholson et al., 2018). Relatedly, Herreid and Pellicciotti (2020)
introduce the term of debris-covered glacier stage ranging from 0 to 1 as
a percentage of the full, 2D debris cover carrying capacity of a glacier,
such that if 100 % of the ablation zone is debris-covered, then the
debris-covered area cannot expand further without up-glacier migration of
the equilibrium line. Further analysis is needed to accurately capture the
complex combination of topographic and climatic factors that contribute to
the development of ponds and vegetation on supraglacial debris cover using
the most recent publicly available and corrected datasets (Herreid and
Pellicciotti, 2020) and a carefully quality-controlled output of the method
proposed here. A full understanding of the occurrence of surface features
also requires knowledge of the transient co-evolution of glacier extents and
debris cover. This would allow us to quantify better the controls on pond
formation and vegetation growth in specific catchments as the debris cover
and glacier geometry develop over time.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page4578?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Spatial and spectral limitations of the Landsat data</title>
      <p id="d1e4524">Our analysis of surface composition of the debris-covered glacier tongues is
subject to several limitations related to the spectral and spatial
resolution of the input Landsat data. While linear spectral unmixing is a
relatively straightforward routine to implement once the endmembers and
their spectra are selected, using Landsat data has several limitations due to their spatial resolution and spectral dimensionality. While
Landsat 8 is superior to the previous Landsat missions in terms of its
calibration, geometry and radiometric resolution (Irons et
al., 2012), its spectral dimensionality remains an issue, particularly with
respect to mapping of the various types of debris material and/or
supraglacial ponds with various degrees of turbidity. Previous studies in
the Himalaya (Casey and Kääb, 2012; Casey et al., 2012; Matta et
al., 2017) suggest that the spectral dimensionality of these two surfaces is
greater than the dimensionality of the Landsat 8 OLI bands available for
unmixing. Landsat has limited spectral resolution data (7 bands available
for unmixing) compared to hyperspectral data (e.g. AVIRIS, 224
bands). Both the partially constrained and the unconstrained LMMs yielded
negative abundances in our study, with larger positive values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) especially for the vegetation class. Since our fractions did not satisfy
the sum-to-unity condition, normalization of the classes was necessary,
which may have introduced further uncertainty in our results because some
classes had higher positive values than others. However, previous studies
showed that these negative values do not necessarily affect the ability to
discriminate between surfaces (Klein and Isacks, 1999).</p>
      <p id="d1e4537">Limitations posed by the spatial resolution of Landsat data (30 m) affected
the accuracy of the selected endmembers. While we used the pixel purity
index to automate the selection of endmembers, we acknowledge that some
mixture may still occur at 30 m spatial resolution. Furthermore, the 30 m
spatial resolution does not allow us to detect supraglacial features such as
ice cliffs or small ponds which can span only a few square metres.
Improvements envisioned here include applying the spectral unmixing
Sentinel-2 imagery, which has a better spectral, spatial and temporal
resolution (13 bands in the visible to short-wave infrared, 10–20 m, 5 d
revisit time) compared to Landsat (7 bands in the visible to short wave, 30 m, 16 d revisit time). This would allow for better definition of
endmembers, facilitating more accurate and repeated mapping in the future.</p>
      <p id="d1e4540">Furthermore, the 30 m spatial resolution of the DEM does not allow us to
infer the precise control of topographic factors such as slope and aspect on
pond formation or a full quantification of the small-scale controls of pond
incidence but only provides a mountain-range scale of the pond
distribution.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Limitations in the endmember definition</title>
      <p id="d1e4552">In this study, we utilized the maximum number of endmembers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
allowed by the spectral resolution of the Landsat 8 OLI data (7 bands), in
an attempt to capture the variability of the system and to avoid high RMSE
of the model which may occur due to missing classes. The main difficulty
here consisted in capturing the wide variability of the materials present
across the mountain range, for example different lithologies, while ensuring
a “valid” LMM. This is defined as one where fractional values do not
exceed 1.01 (under strict constraint rules) or 2.01 (under looser rules) and
where RMSE is less than 2.5 % (Painter et al., 2009). Our
choice of debris endmembers was limited to light and dark debris,
and these may not cover the wide spectrum of lithology present across the
Himalaya. With regards to the on-the-ground spectral characteristics of the
debris material in the Khumbu region, Casey et al. (2012) showed that
these vary due to the presence of various of minerals, notably distinct
granitic (lighter) vs. schistic (darker) debris types with different
compositions. However, spectral differences in these two classes can also be
related to debris water content especially on very thin debris (as for
thinly-debris-covered ice cliffs) and are associated with grain size, i.e.
fine-grained sediments which have a greater capacity for water retention (Juen
et al., 2013; Collier et al., 2014). We also noted such differences in the
spectra for wet fine debris and dry coarse debris with large grain sizes on
Mer de Glace (Fig. 4b); however, the limited Landsat
spectral resolution implies that we could not define separate endmembers for
each. Using only two endmembers for debris cannot capture the various types
of debris with different mineral and geochemical composition, nor can it
distinguish between debris with various degrees of water content, which has
a different spectral signature compared to dry debris
(Fig. 4b). Furthermore, we could not take into
consideration bare illuminated non-glacierized surfaces including nunataks,
which were occasionally mistakenly included within the polygons in the SDC
dataset. As a result, these areas were also associated with some high
positive fractional values, which might have affected the overall RMSE of
our model and particularly the sum-to-unity condition.</p>
      <p id="d1e4567">Although we defined the water endmember on the basis of turbid water
(greyish-blue ponds), supraglacial ponds of various turbidity levels are
present across the mountain range, due to various degrees of suspended
sediments. The colour of these ponds can range from grey to turquoise and
reddish shades in various proportions (Matta et al., 2017) to small
clear water supraglacial ponds (Takeuchi et al., 2012; Giardino et
al., 2010), as observed in the field (Fig. 3e). Each
type of pond has different spectral signatures, but the limited spectral
resolution of Landsat does not allow us to use concomitantly both a clear and a
variable turbid water endmember in the spectral unmixing. Nevertheless, as
shown in Fig. 7, the majority of the turbid supraglacial ponds are
connected to the exposed ice and glacier drainage<?pagebreak page4579?> network (hence larger
suspended sediment), are expected to be most relevant to glacier
evolution and may be of concern for outburst flood potential. Our algorithm parameterized for clear water nicely picks out the small number of isolated non-turbid
ponds at the terminus of the Ngozumpa Glacier (Fig. 7), highlighting the
success of different endmember selection for addressing other scientific
questions. With further testing, fractional water maps obtained from
spectral unmixing techniques can be used to characterize the state of lakes
and ponds in terms of their turbidity (Matta et al., 2017; Giardino
et al., 2010), i.e. by quantifying the fraction of a pixel covered by water,
light and/or dark debris. In this regard, repeated monitoring of pond
turbidity using these combined tools allows changes in suspended sediment
load to be tracked over time, as direct indicators of
glacier wasting processes and glacier–lake interaction (Giardino et
al., 2010). This aspect is not fully explored in this study but can be
further investigated by combining LMMs with field spectra of ponds and lakes
to characterize the various degrees of turbidity across the mountain range.
Since lake turbidity is temporally highly variable and since our current
dataset is a snapshot of pond density, it cannot be used to infer any
variability in sediment concentration, but it provides the basis for
tracking changes in glacier area for further applications.</p>
      <p id="d1e4570">Similarly, we could not define a healthy vegetation endmember whose spectral
signature (not shown here) differs from that of the dry vegetation
endmember we selected. However, small amounts of healthy vegetation do occur
on debris-covered glaciers in the eastern part of the Khumbu region, and
these were indeed detected by the LMM (Fig. 10).</p>
      <p id="d1e4573">The cloud and clean ice detection based on LMM was not accurate in this
particular configuration. While some isolated pixels were classified as
clouds, others pixels were confounded with other types of surfaces, notably
debris (Table 2). While the cloud distribution noted
in this study corresponds to local meteorology, i.e. more frequent cloud
cover in the eastern Himalaya until later fall months compared to the
western part (Thayyen and Gergan, 2010), we are less confident in
the actual estimations of the cloud cover areas, so we do not wish to
over-interpret these. Applying algorithms such as Fmask (Zhu et
al., 2015) to mask the clouds resulted in misclassification of the entire
glacierized surface as cloud, which is a well-documented issue
(Stillinger et al., 2019), so we could not mask the clouds prior
to the spectral unmixing.</p>
      <p id="d1e4577">Likewise, clean ice was poorly classified, mostly likely due to its poor
representation in the dataset (i.e. limited number of clean ice pure
pixels). While our results hint at the presence of ice to some extent, we
are not confident about these results. Some pixels correspond indeed to
location of ice cliffs which were perhaps exposed at the end of the ablation
season (Fig. 9); others correspond mostly to
clean ice patches at the upper limit of supraglacial debris
included in the input data, which dated from previous years, or seasonal
snow. While we chose our images at the end of the ablation season,
post-monsoon snow cover is usually minimal, but early snowfalls can
occur. Other features such as the ice sails (Evatt et
al., 2017) may not be extracted at the spatial resolution of
the Landsat imagery, since these features often span only several square
metres. At the same time, the LMM algorithm in its current parameterization
cannot detect ice cliffs dusted with fine debris, which have a lower albedo
than clean ice (Naegeli et al., 2015). Targeting exposed but
dusted ice features within the debris cover in addition to clean ice would
need some refinement of the algorithm using Sentinel-2 imagery with better
spectral resolution and better parameterization
(Kneib et al., 2020), optical thresholding of band
ratios using high-resolution imagery (Anderson et al., 2021)
and/or feature detection based on OBIA (Kraaijenbrink et al., 2016;
Watson et al., 2017a; Mölg et al., 2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Uncertainty due to the thresholds applied to fractional maps</title>
      <p id="d1e4588">Selection of the thresholds used to classify the fractional maps to obtain
the final maps of each surface is another source of uncertainty in our
method. Previous spectral unmixing studies (Hall et al., 2002;
Rittger et al., 2013) justified using a threshold of 0.5 for the
classifying fractional maps for various types of surfaces, while they also
tested thresholds as low as 0.15 (Rittger et al., 2013). While
we applied a threshold of 0.5 and 0.65 to our water and vegetation classes,
respectively, for the other classes the fractional thresholds were
ultimately determined using visual inspection, which introduced a certain
degree of subjectivity into our study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Quality of input SDC dataset</title>
      <p id="d1e4600">Due to the spectral limitations of Landsat, in this study we applied the
unmixing only to the debris-covered areas of glaciers to reduce model
complexity. Therefore, model performance is to some extent subject to the
quality of the input dataset. At the onset of our study, the only global
database of supraglacial debris was the SDC dataset (Scherler et al.,
2018), and although Herreid and Pellicciotti (2020) provide updated
supraglacial debris outlines, these were not available at the onset of our
study and are not currently incorporated in the standardized RGI dataset.
Debris outlines in the SDC dataset constitute a multi-time stamp dataset,
based on data spanning 1998 to 2015, while our Landsat data were based
primarily on 2015. This may introduce uncertainties in the calculation of
pond coverage. For example, we assumed that any changes at the termini of
the debris-covered areas would have occurred within these older outlines,
since surge-type glaciers and hence apparent glacier advance are rare
or non-existent in the Himalaya region, contrary to the Karakoram
(Sevestre and Benn, 2015). However, recent studies have reported an
upward expansion of the debris cover in the Himalaya (Xie et al., 2020;
Thakuri et al., 2014; Bhambri et<?pagebreak page4580?> al., 2011b; Kamp et al., 2011), which we do
not account for here. As such, in these areas, our pond density may be
underestimated, and this would need a more in-depth analysis requiring the use of multi-temporal supraglacial debris datasets. Furthermore,
our study revealed some important issues with the input SDC dataset used to
constrain the spectral unmixing, particularly the inclusion of patches of
healthy vegetation and bare bright steep terrain. The spurious vegetated
areas present within the debris cover outlines (Fig. 10b) may have affected to some extent the quality of the spectral unmixing,
i.e. the non-negativity and the sum-to-unity conditions, because it
produced large negative and positive fractional vegetation values. We were
able to identify theses as being healthy vegetation on non-glacierized
terrain. On the other hand, some of the high percentage of supraglacial
vegetation in some of the eastern parts is attributed to errors in the input
supraglacial dataset, and we are hesitant to over-interpret the vegetation
analysis. However, we note the potential of the fractional vegetation maps
for identifying mapping errors in the SDC dataset. Because these abnormal
values served to identify errors in the existing SDC dataset, they
constitute a valuable tool to correct and refine these global databases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><title>Wider applicability of the method</title>
      <p id="d1e4611">In this study we demonstrated the transferability of a method developed on a
single region for the year 2015 (Khumbu) by applying it to a Landsat 8 OLI
scene from a different area (Lahaul–Spiti) for the same season
(post-monsoonal) but a different year (2016) and validating the ponds with
PlanetScope data. In the light of the spatial and spectral limitations of
Landsat data discussed above, the applicability of our approach for
multitemporal analyses requires careful considerations. When transferring
methods from one scene to others, illumination differences and shadow
effects across the scenes need to be resolved, particularly if the scenes
are not acquired on the same date. In this study, we attempted to minimize
these effects by applying atmospheric and topographic corrections and
implicitly assumed that the set of endmembers defined for the Khumbu region could
be applied to the entire Himalaya. However, in some areas, some spectral
differences may remain, leading to confusion between the water/light
debris/ice classes and hence some overestimation of the pond coverage,
particularly in some areas of the western Himalaya. While these pond areas
require further quality control prior to their inclusion in regional
datasets, they are within the uncertainties reported at other sites, for
example the Langtang region (Steiner et al., 2019). Furthermore, if the
approach is used over the same area for multi-temporal pond or vegetation
analysis, the geolocation accuracy of the Landsat can be a concern, because
the pixels can be slightly misaligned from acquisition to acquisition,
resulting in potentially very different compositions and unmixing results.
This needs to be mitigated by co-registration of the scenes prior to
unmixing and performing the change analysis. Further uncertainty is
introduced in our study by the fact that for certain areas of the Himalaya,
Landsat cloud-free and snow-free scenes were not available for the year
2015, and we used scenes from 2014 and 2016 (see Table 1). We assumed that
surface conditions were similar but acknowledge that pond areas are dynamic
and can change from year to year. Furthermore, this study does not account
for the seasonality of supraglacial ponds but provides a methodological
basis for their identification.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and further work</title>
      <p id="d1e4624">In this study, we estimated the spatial distribution of surface
characteristics on debris-covered glaciers (various types of debris, clean
ice, supraglacial ponds and vegetation) at the subpixel scale using 30 m
fractional maps obtained from a spectral linear mixing model. We tested the
approach in the Khumbu region comprising eastern Nepal and parts of China
using Landsat 8 OLI imagery and then applied it over the entire Himalaya to
evaluate its performance over a larger domain. Pléiades and Planet
high-resolution imagery was used to assess the endmember selection and to
validate the mapped supraglacial pond areas using OBIA techniques. Our key
findings can be summarized as follows:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4629">We demonstrate the use of Landsat spectral unmixing in determining the
surface properties of debris-covered glaciers, which holds great potential
for mapping the dynamic changes in surface conditions at a regional scale.
While we present a method that holds promise for effectively partitioning
the surface properties of debris-covered glaciers, we recommend that future
analysis of the potential drivers and controls on the observed surface types
and their regional variation revealed by this method be carried out on a
further-quality-controlled dataset to avoid over-interpretation of any
errors within the datasets used.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4633">We show that spectral signatures derived from the Landsat 8 OLI imagery and
cross-checked using high-resolution Pléiades images can be applied at the
mountain-range scale provided that all images are atmospherically and
topographically corrected to reduce differences in illumination patterns
and that images are acquired around the same date. While the limited Landsat
spectral resolution did not allow for a very fine definition of the wide
spectrum of all the different debris lithologies and ice types present on
debris-covered tongues across the study area, LMM successfully distinguished
among broad categories and convincingly reproduced independently mapped
supraglacial pond areas. Overall, we consider the spectral unmixing method
presented here a promising approach to add to the suite<?pagebreak page4581?> of tools that are
valuable in analysing the dynamic surfaces of debris-covered glaciers.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4637">One of the major contributions of the current study is that we produced a
supraglacial pond inventory for the entire Himalaya for the year 2015, based
on spectral unmixing of coarse-resolution and freely available Landsat 8 OLI
satellite imagery. We consider that this approach can provide more detail
and thus outperform other analyses of supraglacial pond identification and
classification performed on similar Landsat data for the same period but
based on normalized difference water indices (Shugar et al., 2020) or manual
delineation (Chen et al., 2021). The method and results are comparable to
mapping quality from higher resolution, allowing improved analysis of
multitemporal change in pond incidence and size in a future study. The
dataset of supraglacial ponds is available in the public domain via the Zenodo data
repository (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4421857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4421857</ext-link>).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4644">Regional trend analysis of gridded data indicates that higher average
temperatures and more abundant precipitation have a strong influence on pond
development and to a much lesser extent on supraglacial vegetation
occurrence. Higher glacier thinning rates coupled with lower average glacier
velocities are consistent with pond incidence and seem to favour the
development of supraglacial vegetation. The extent of the supraglacial
debris and the elevation of the termini exhibit a weak control on
supraglacial pond coverage and a moderate control on supraglacial
vegetation.</p></list-item></list>
Future developments to overcome the current limitations of this study
include the use of more sophisticated non-linear mixing models, which would
allow us to discriminate materials of interest in more detail. Work is ongoing
to make the unmixing step approach fully automated by integrating it within
scripting routines (Bunting et al., 2014), so that it can be
applied in the future to derive supraglacial pond outlines at multi-temporal
scales and monitor pond development over time. Given that these surface
ponds are ephemeral and change rapidly, automated multi-temporal-scale
mapping is highly desirable to track their evolution over time in various
regions. The analysis presented here complements and expands the existing
proglacial lake databases for the year 2015 by providing supraglacial pond
extents. With continued advances in satellite data in the near future, the
methodology developed here provides avenues towards achieving large-scale,
repeated mapping of supraglacial features.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4652">Atmospheric and topographic corrections were performed using the ARCSI
routine, embedded in the freely available, python-based RSGISLib software
available freely (Bunting et al., 2014). The code for batch
processing of the Landsat 8 OLI images for the entire Himalaya can be
provided upon request. Post-processing of the spectrally unmixed Landsat 8
OLI maps was done using the Python module ArcPy from ESRI ArcGIS. The steps
for loop processing (normalizing the fractional raster files, classifying
the surfaces and extracting the composition of the debris-covered glaciers
from the fractional maps) can be provided upon request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4658">Landsat 8 OLI data used in this study can be obtained at no cost from the
USGS EarthExplorer (<uri>https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/</uri>, last access: 30 June 2021). All
versions of the NASA SRTM Global 1 arc second DEMs are available from the
Earthdata platform (<uri>https://earthdata.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 20 September 2021). All versions
of the ALOS Global Digital Surface Model, including the one used in this
paper, are available from <uri>https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/aw3d30/index.htm</uri> (last access: 20 September 2021). Datasets of
supraglacial ponds and vegetation, along with the fractional maps, are
available via the Zenodo data repository (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4421857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4421857</ext-link>, Racoviteanu et al., 2021).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4673">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4557-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4557-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4682">AER conceived the idea, designed the spectral unmixing experiments, led this
work, obtained and processed the Landsat and the high-resolution images, and
wrote the paper with input from co-authors. LN provided the Pléiades
imagery, discussed the research strategy and helped select endmembers based
on field expertise. NFG supervised the study and provided geomorphology
expertise. All authors contributed to writing the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4688">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4694">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4700">We acknowledge the Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (FFG) project “High-resolution spaceborne studies of mass balance processes on glaciers of the Khumbu Himal, Nepal” (GlHima-Sat) for providing access to Pléiades imagery. We acknowledge the BritInn
Fellowship Programme which funded Adina E. Racoviteanu's work visit to the University
of Innsbruck to develop this research with Lindsey Nicholson in 2018. We are grateful to the United States Geological Survey and to the Planet API programme for providing free access to
Landsat and RapidEye imagery. We thank Lorenzo Rieg and Christoph Klug of
the University of Innsbruck for processing of the Pléiades DEMs. We are grateful to Marin Kneib and an anonymous referee for providing valuable comments on the paper.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4705">Adina E. Racoviteanu's research was supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 663830. Lindsey Nicholson was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (grant no. P28521).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4711">This paper was edited by Daniel Farinotti and reviewed by Marin Kneib and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alifu, H., Johnson, B., and Tateishi, R.: Delineation of Debris-Covered
Glaciers Based on a Combination of Geomorphometric Parameters and a
TIR/NIR/SWIR Band Ratio, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl., 9, 781–792,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2500906" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2500906</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, L. S., Armstrong, W. H., Anderson, R. S., and Buri, P.: Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska: in situ measurements, automated ice cliff delineation and distributed melt estimates, The Cryosphere, 15, 265–282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-265-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-15-265-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, P. M.: Mapping sub-pixel boundaries from remotely sensed images, in: Innovations in GIS4, edited by: Zemp, Z., Taylor &amp; Francis, London, 166–180, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, P. M.: Resolution Manipulation and Sub-Pixel Mapping, in: Remote Sensing Image Analysis: Including The Spatial Domain, edited by: Jong, S. M. D. and Meer, F. D. V. D., Springer, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Barros, A. P. and Lang, T. J.: Monitoring the Monsoon in the Himalayas:
Observations in Central Nepal, June 2001, Mon. Weather Rev., 1408–1427, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Benn, D. I., Bolch, T., Hands, K., Gulley, J., Luckman, A., Nicholson, L.
I., Quincey, D., Thompson, S., Toumi, R., and Wiseman, S.: Response of
debris-covered glaciers in the Mount Everest region to recent warming, and
implications for outburst flood hazards, Earth Sci. Rev., 114, 156–174,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.03.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.03.008</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bhambri, R., Bolch, T., and Chaujar, R. K.: Mapping of Debris-covered
Glaciers in the Garhwal Himalayas using ASTER DEMs and Thermal Data, Int. J.
Rem. Sens., 32, 8095–8119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.532821" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431161.2010.532821</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bhambri, R., Bolch, T., Chaujar, R. K., and Kulshreshtha, S. C.: Glacier
changes in the Garhwal Himalaya, India, from 1968 to 2006 based on remote
sensing, J. Glaciol., 57, 543–556, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bishop, M. P., Bonk, R., Kamp, U., and Shroder, J.: Terrain analysis
and data modeling for alpine glacier mapping, Polar Geogr., 25, 182–201,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Blaschke, T., Hay, G. J., Kelly, M., Lang, S., Hofmann, P., Addink, E.,
Queiroz Feitosa, R., van der Meer, F., van der Werff, H., van Coillie, F.,
and Tiede, D.: Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis – Towards a new
paradigm, ISPRS J. Photogram. Rem. Sens., 87, 180–191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.09.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.09.014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bolch, T., Buchroithner, M. F., Kunert, A., and Kamp, U.: Automated
delineation of debris-covered glaciers based on ASTER data, Geoinformation
in Europe, in: Proc. of 27th EARSel Symposium, 4–7 June 2007, Bozen, Italy,
403–410, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bolch, T., Buchroithner, M. F., Pieczonka, T., and Kunert, A.: Planimetric
and Volumetric Glacier Changes in the Khumbu Himalaya since 1962 Using
Corona, Landsat TM and ASTER Data, J. Glaciol., 54, 592–600, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bolch, T., Pieczonka, T., and Benn, D. I.: Multi-decadal mass loss of glaciers in the Everest area (Nepal Himalaya) derived from stereo imagery, The Cryosphere, 5, 349–358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-349-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-5-349-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bolch, T., Shea, J. M., Liu, S., Azam, F. M., Gao, Y., Gruber, S.,
Immerzeel, W. W., Kulkarni, A., Li, H., Tahir, A. A., Zhang, G., and Zhang,
Y.: Status and Change of the Cryosphere in the Extended Hindu Kush Himalaya
Region, in: The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment: Mountains, Climate Change,
Sustainability and People, edited by: Wester, P., Mishra, A., Mukherji, A.,
and Shrestha, A. B., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 209–255, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bookhagen, B. and Burbank, D. W.: Topography, relief and TRMM-derived
rainfall variations along the Himalaya, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L08405,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl026037</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bookhagen, B. and Burbank, D. W.: Toward a complete Himalyan hydrological
budget: spatiotemporal distribution of snowmlet ad rainfall and their impact
on river discharge, J. Geophys. Res., 115, F03019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001426" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JF001426</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brun, F., Buri, P., Miles, E. S., Wagnon, P., Steiner, J., Berthier, E.,
Ragettli, S., Kraaijenbrink, P., Immerzeel, W. W., and Pellicciotti, F.:
Quantifying volume loss from ice cliffs on debris-covered glaciers using
high-resolution terrestrial and aerial photogrammetry, J. Glaciol., 62,
684–695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.54" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2016.54</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brun, F., Berthier, E., Wagnon, P., Kääb, A., and Treichler, D.: A
spatially resolved estimate of High Mountain Asia glacier mass balances from
2000 to 2016, Nat. Geosci., 10, 668–673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2999</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brun, F., Wagnon, P., Berthier, E., Shea, J. M., Immerzeel, W. W., Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Vincent, C., Reverchon, C., Shrestha, D., and Arnaud, Y.: Ice cliff contribution to the tongue-wide ablation of Changri Nup Glacier, Nepal, central Himalaya, The Cryosphere, 12, 3439–3457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3439-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-12-3439-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brun, F., Wagnon, P., Berthier, E., Jomelli, V., Maharjan, S. B., Shrestha,
F., and Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A.: Heterogeneous Influence of Glacier
Morphology on the Mass Balance Variability in High Mountain Asia, J. Geophys.
Res.-Earth Surf., 124, 1331–1345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JF004838</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bunting, P., Clewley, D., Lucas, R., and Gillingham, S.: The Remote Sensing
and GIS Software Library (RSGISLib), Comput. Geosci., 62, 216–226, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buri, P., Miles, E. S., Steiner, J. F., Immerzeel, W. W., Wagnon, P., and
Pellicciotti, F.: A physically based 3-D model of ice cliff evolution over
debris-covered glaciers, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 121, 2471–2493,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF004039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JF004039</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Casey, K. and Kääb, A.: Estimation of Supraglacial Dust and Debris
Geochemical Composition via Satellite Reflectance and Emissivity, Remote Sens.,
4, 2554–2575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4092554" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs4092554</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4583?><ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Casey, K. A., Kääb, A., and Benn, D. I.: Geochemical characterization of supraglacial debris via in situ and optical remote sensing methods: a case study in Khumbu Himalaya, Nepal, The Cryosphere, 6, 85–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-85-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-6-85-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chand, B. M. and Watanabe, T.: Development of Supraglacial Ponds in the
Everest Region, Nepal, between 1989 and 2018, Remote Sens., 11, 9,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11091058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs11091058</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, F., Zhang, M., Guo, H., Allen, S., Kargel, J. S., Haritashya, U. K., and Watson, C. S.: Annual 30 m dataset for glacial lakes in High Mountain Asia from 2008 to 2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 741–766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-741-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-13-741-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collier, E., Nicholson, L. I., Brock, B. W., Maussion, F., Essery, R., and Bush, A. B. G.: Representing moisture fluxes and phase changes in glacier debris cover using a reservoir approach, The Cryosphere, 8, 1429–1444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1429-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-1429-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cortés, G., Girotto, M., and Margulis, S. A.: Analysis of sub-pixel snow
and ice extent over the extratropical Andes using spectral unmixing of
historical Landsat imagery, Remote Sens. Environ., 141, 64–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.023</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dehecq, A., Gourmelen, N., and Trouve, E.: Deriving large-scale glacier
velocities from a complete satellite archive: Application to the
Pamir-Karakoram-Himalaya, Remote Sens. Environ., 162, 55–66,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.031</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dehecq, A., Gourmelen, N., Gardner, A. S., Brun, F., Goldberg, D., Nienow,
P. W., Berthier, E., Vincent, C., Wagnon, P., and Trouvé, E.:
Twenty-first century glacier slowdown driven by mass loss in High Mountain
Asia, Nat. Geosci., 12, 22–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0271-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-018-0271-9</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Delafontaine, M., Nolf, G., van de Weghe, N., Antrop, M., and de Maeyer, P.:
Assessment of sliver polygons in geographical vector data, Int. J. Geogr. Inf.
Sci., 23, 719–735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701694838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/13658810701694838</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dixit, A. and Agarwal, S.: Non-linear spectral unmixing of hyperspectral
data using Modified PPNMM, Appl. Comput. Geosci., 9, 100053,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2021.100053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.acags.2021.100053</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
ERDAS:  LPS Project Manager User's Guide, Norcross, GA, USA, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ettritch, G., Bunting, P., Jones, G., and Hardy, A.: Monitoring the coastal
zone using earth observation: application of linear spectral unmixing to
coastal dune systems in Wales, Remote Sens. Ecol. Cons., 4, 303–319,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.79" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rse2.79</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Evatt, G. W., Abrahams, D., Heil, M., Mayer, C., Kingslake, J., Mitchell, S.
L., Fowler, A. C., and Clark, C. D.: Glacial melt under a porous debris
layer, J. Glaciol., 61, 229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2015JoG14J235</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Evatt, G. W., Mayer, C., Mallinson, A. M. Y., Abrahams, I. D., Heil, M., and
Nicholson, L.: The secret life of ice sails, J. Glaciol., 63, 1049–1062,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.72" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2017.72</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fickert, T., Friend, D., Grüninger, F., Molnia, B., and Richter, M.: Did
Debris-Covered Glaciers Serve as Pleistocene Refugia for Plants? A New
Hypothesis Derived from Observations of Recent Plant Growth on Glacier
Surfaces, AAAR, 39, 245–257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(2007)39[245:DDGSAP]2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1657/1523-0430(2007)39[245:DDGSAP]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Foody, G. M.: Sub-pixel methods in remote sensing, in:Remote sensing image analysis: including the spatial domain, edited by: de Jong, S. M. and van der Meer, F. D., Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 37–49, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Foster, L. A., Brock, B. W., Cutler, M. E. J., and Diotri, F.: A physically
based method for estimating supraglacial debris thickness from thermal band
remote-sensing data, J. Glaciol., 58, 677–690, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
GAPHAZ: Assessment of Glacier and Permafrost Hazards in Mountain Regions –
Technical Guidance Document, Zurich, Switzerland/Lima, Peru, 72, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gardelle, J., Arnaud, Y., and Berthier, E.: Contrasted evolution of glacial
lakes along the Hindu Kush Himalaya mountain range between 1990 and 2009,
Global Planet. Change, 75, 1–2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.10.003</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gardelle, J., Berthier, E., Arnaud, Y., and Kääb, A.: Region-wide glacier mass balances over the Pamir-Karakoram-Himalaya during 1999–2011, The Cryosphere, 7, 1263–1286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1263-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-1263-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Giardino, C., Oggioni, A., Bresciani, M., and Yan, H.: Remote Sensing of
Suspended Particulate Matter in Himalayan Lakes, Mt. Res. Dev., 30, 157–168,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00042.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00042.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R., Welton, E. J., Korkin, S. V., and Lyapustin, A. I.: Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 169–209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-169-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gillespie, A. R., Smith, M. O., Adams, J. B., Willis, S. C., Fischer, A. F.,
III,, and Sabol, D. E.: Interpretation of residual images: spectral mixture
analysis of AVIRIS images, Owens Valley, California, Proceedings of the
Second Air- borne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Workshop, 243–270,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gillingham, S. S., Flood, N., and Gill, T. K.: On determining appropriate
aerosol optical depth values for atmospheric correction of satellite imagery
for biophysical parameter retrieval: requirements and limitations under
Australian conditions, Int. J. Remote Sens., 34, 2089–2100,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.738945" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431161.2012.738945</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Green, A. A., Berman, M., Switzer, P., and Craig, M. D.: A transformation
for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications
for noise removal, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 26, 65–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.3001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/36.3001</ext-link>,
1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hall, D. K. R., George, A., Salomonson, V. V., DiGirolamo, N. E.,
and Bayr, K. J.: MODIS Snow-Cover Products, Remote Sens. Env, 83, 88–89,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harris Geospatial: ENVI Feature Extraction module, available at: <uri>https://www.l3harrisgeospatial.com/Portals/0/pdfs/HG_ENVI_FX_module_data-sheet_WEB.pdf</uri>, last access: 25 April 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Herreid, S. and Pellicciotti, F.: Automated detection of ice cliffs within supraglacial debris cover, The Cryosphere, 12, 1811–1829, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1811-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-12-1811-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Herreid, S. and Pellicciotti, F.: The state of rock debris covering Earth's
glaciers, Nat. Geosci., 13, 621–627, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0615-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-020-0615-0</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Irons, J. R., Dwyer, J. L., and Barsi, J. A.: The next Landsat satellite:
The Landsat Data Continuity Mission, Remote Sens. Environ., 122, 11–21,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.026</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Irvine-Fynn, T. D. L., Porter, P. R., Rowan, A. V., Quincey, D. J., Gibson,
M. J., Bridge, J. W., Watson, C. S., Hubbard, A., and Glasser, N. F.:
Supraglacial ponds regulate runoff fro<?pagebreak page4584?>m Himalayan debris-covered glaciers,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 11894–11904, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL075398</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Iwata, S., Watanabe, O., and Fushimi, H.: Surface morphology in the ablation
area of the Khumbu glacier, J. Japan Soc. Snow Ice (Seppyo), 41, 9–17,
1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Iwata, S., Aoki, T., Kadota, T., Seko, K., and Yamaguchi, S.: Morphological
evolution of the debris cover on Khumbu Glacier, Nepal, between 1978 and
1995, in: Debris-covered glaciers, edited by: Nakawo, M., Raymond, C. F.,
and Fountain, A., IAHS, IAHS Publication no. 264, Wallingford, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>JAXA: ALOS Global Digital Surface Model “ALOS World 3D – 30m”, available at: <uri>https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/aw3d30/data/index.htm</uri> (last access: 20 September 2021), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jones, D. B., Harrison, S., and Anderson, K.: Mountain glacier-to-rock glacier transition, Global Planet. Change, 181, 102999, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.102999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.102999</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Juen, M., Mayer, C., Lambrecht, A., Wirbel, A., and Kueppers, U.: Thermal
properties of a supraglacial debris layer with respect to lithology and
grain size, Geogr. Ann. Phys. Geogr., 95, 197–209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/geoa.12011</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kääb, A., Berthier, E., Nuth, C., Gardelle, J., and Arnaud, Y.:
Contrasting patterns of early twenty-first-century glacier mass change in
the Himalayas, Nature, 488, 495–498, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11324" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature11324</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kamp, U., Byrne, M., and Bolch, T.: Glacier fluctuations between 1975 and
2008 in the Greater Himalaya Range of Zanskar, southern Ladakh, J. Mt. Sci., 8,
374–389, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kayastha, R. B., Takeuchi, Y., Nakawo, M., and Ageta, Y.: Practical
prediction of ice melting beneath various thickness of debris cover on
Khumbu Glacier, Nepal, using a positive degree-day factor, in:
Debris-Covered Glaciers, edited by: Raymond, C. F., Nakawo, M., Fountain,
A., IAHS, Wallingford, UK, 71–81, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keshava, N. and Mustard, J. F.: Spectral unmixing, IEEE Signal Processing
Magazine, 19, 44–57, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/79.974727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/79.974727</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirkbride, M.: About the concepts of continuum and age, Boreas, 18, 87–88,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1989.tb00376.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1502-3885.1989.tb00376.x</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kirkbride, M. P.: Debris-Covered Glaciers, in: Encyclopedia of Snow, Ice and
Glaciers, edited by: Singh, V. P., Singh, P., and Haritashya, U. K.,
Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 180–182, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Klein, A. G. and Isacks, B. L.: Spectral mixture analysis of Landsat
thematic mapper images applied to the detection of the transient snowline on
tropical Andean glaciers, Global Planet. Change, 22, 139–154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(99)00032-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0921-8181(99)00032-6</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kneib, M., Miles, E. S., Jola, S., Buri, P., Herreid, S., Bhattacharya, A.,
Watson, C. S., Bolch, T., Quincey, D., and Pellicciotti, F.: Mapping ice
cliffs on debris-covered glaciers using multispectral satellite images, Remote Sens. Environ., 253, 112201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2020.112201</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Knight, J., Harrison, S., and Jones, D. B.: Rock glaciers and the
geomorphological evolution of deglacierizing mountains, Geomorphology, 324,
14–24, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Komori, J.: Recent expansions of glacial lakes in the Bhutan Himalayas,
Quaternary Int., 184, 177–186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.09.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quaint.2007.09.012</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Shea, J. M., Pellicciotti, F., Jong, S. M. D., and
Immerzeel, W. W.: Object-based analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery
to map and characterise surface features on a debris-covered glacier, Remote Sens. Environ., 186, 581–595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.09.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2016.09.013</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Leprince, S., Ayoub, F., Klinger, Y., and Avouac, J.: Co-Registration of
Optically Sensed Images and Correlation (COSI-Corr): an operational
methodology for ground deformation measurements, IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens.
Symposium, Barcelona, Spain, 1943–1946, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, Q., Mayer, C., and Liu, S.: Distribution and interannual variability of
supraglacial lakes on debris-covered glaciers in the Khan Tengri-Tumor
Mountains, Central Asia, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 014014,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014014</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matta, E., Giardino, C., Boggero, A., and Bresciani, M.: Use of Satellite
and In Situ Reflectance Data for Lake Water Color Characterization in the
Everest Himalayan Region, Mt. Res. Dev., 37, 16–23,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00052.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00052.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Maurer, J. M., Schaefer, J. M., Rupper, S., and Corley, A.: Acceleration of
ice loss across the Himalayas over the past 40 years, Sci. Adv., 5, eaav7266,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aav7266</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miles, E. S., Pellicciotti, F., Willis, I. C., Steiner, J. F., Buri, P., and
Arnold, N. S.: Refined energy-balance modelling of a supraglacial pond,
Langtang Khola, Nepal, Ann. Glaciol., 57, 29–40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2016AoG71A421" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2016AoG71A421</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miles, E. S., Steiner, J., Willis, I., Buri, P., Immerzeel, W. W.,
Chesnokova, A., and Pellicciotti, F.: Pond Dynamics and
Supraglacial-Englacial Connectivity on Debris-Covered Lirung Glacier, Nepal,
Front. Earth Sci., 5, 69, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2017.00069</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Miles, E. S., Willis, I. C., Arnold, N. S., Steiner, J., and Pellicciotti,
F.: Spatial, seasonal and interannual variability of supraglacial ponds in
the Langtang Valley of Nepal, 1999–2013, J. Glaciol., 63, 88–105, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miles, E. S., Willis, I., Buri, P., Steiner, J. F., Arnold, N. S., and
Pellicciotti, F.: Surface Pond Energy Absorption Across Four Himalayan
Glaciers Accounts for 1/8 of Total Catchment Ice Loss, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
10464–10473, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079678" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL079678</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mölg, N., Bolch, T., Walter, A., and Vieli, A.: Unravelling the evolution of Zmuttgletscher and its debris cover since the end of the Little Ice Age, The Cryosphere, 13, 1889–1909, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1889-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-13-1889-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Monnier, S. and Kinnard, C.: Pluri-decadal (1955–2014) evolution of glacier–rock glacier transitional landforms in the central Andes of Chile (30–33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 493–509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-493-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-5-493-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mukul, M., Srivastava, V., Jade, S., and Mukul, M.: Uncertainties in the
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Heights: Insights from the Indian
Himalaya and Peninsula, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 41672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41672" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep41672</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Muñoz-Sabater, J.: ERA5-Land monthly averaged data from 1981 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.68d2bb3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.68d2bb3</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Naegeli, K., Damm, A., Huss, M., Schaepman, M., and Hoelzle, M.: Imaging
spectroscopy to assess th<?pagebreak page4585?>e composition of ice surface materials and their
impact on glacier mass balance, Remote Sens. Environ., 168, 388–402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.006</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Naegeli, K., Damm, A., Huss, M., Wulf, H., Schaepman, M., and Hoelzle, M.:
Cross-Comparison of Albedo Products for Glacier Surfaces Derived from
Airborne and Satellite (Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8) Optical Data, Remote Sens., 9, 2,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs9020110</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nakawo, M., Yabuki, H., and Sakai, A.: Characteristics of Khumbu Glacier,
Nepal Himalaya: recent change in the debris-covered area,
Ann. Glaciol., 28, 118–122, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Narama, C., Daiyrov, M., Tadono, T., Yamamoto, M., Kääb, A., Morita,
R., and Ukita, J.: Seasonal drainage of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered
glaciers in the Tien Shan Mountains, Central Asia, Geomorphology, 286,
133–142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.002</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nicholson, L. and Benn, D. I.: Calculating ice melt beneath a debris layer
using meteorological data, J. Glaciol., 52, 463–470,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756506781828584" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756506781828584</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nicholson, L. I., McCarthy, M., Pritchard, H. D., and Willis, I.: Supraglacial debris thickness variability: impact on ablation and relation to terrain properties, The Cryosphere, 12, 3719–3734, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3719-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-12-3719-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nie, Y., Sheng, Y., Liu, Q., Liu, L., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., and Song, C.: A
regional-scale assessment of Himalayan glacial lake changes using satellite
observations from 1990 to 2015, Remote Sens. Environ., 189, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.008</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nuimura, T., Fujita, K., Yamaguchi, S., and Sharma, R. R.: Elevation changes
of glaciers revealed by multitemporal digital elevation models calibrated by
GPS survey in the Khumbu region, Nepal Himalaya, 1992–2008, J. Glaciol., 58,
648–656, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Østrem, G.: Ice Melting under a Thin Layer of Moraine, and the Existence
of Ice Cores in Moraine Ridges, Geografiska Annaler, 41, 228–230, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H., Dozier, J., Roberts, D. A., Davis, R. E.,
and Green, R. O.: Retrieval of subpixel snow-covered area and grain size from imaging
spectrometer data, Remote Sens. Environ., 85, 64–77, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Rittger, K., McKenzie, C., Slaughter, P., Davis, R. E., and
Dozier, J.: Retrieval of subpixel snow covered area, grain size, and albedo
from MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 868–879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Brodzik, M. J., Racoviteanu, A., and Armstrong, R.:
Automated mapping of Earth's annual minimum exposed snow and ice with MODIS,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL053340</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Panday, P., Bulley, H., Haritashya, U., and Ghimire, B.: Supraglacial Lake
Classification in the Everest Region of Nepal Himalaya, in: Geospatial
Techniques for Managing Environmental Resources, edited by: Thakur, J. K., Singh, S. K., Ramanathan, A., Prasad, M. B. K., and Gossel, W., Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Paul, F., Huggel, C., and Kääb, A.: Combining satellite
multispectral image data and a digital elevation model for mapping
debris-covered glaciers, Remote Sens. Environ., 89, 510–518, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., and Belward, A. S.: High-resolution
mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes, Nature, 540,
418–422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature20584</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pfeffer, W. T., Arendt, A. A., Bliss, A., Bolch, T., Cogley, J. G., Gardner,
A. S., Hagen, J. O., Hock, R., Kaser, G., Kienholz, C., Miles, E. S.,
Moholdt, G., Mölg, N., Paul, F., Radić, V., Rastner, P., Raup, B.
H., Rich, J., Sharp, M. J., and Randolph_Consortium: The
Randolph Glacier Inventory: a globally complete inventory of glaciers, J.
Glaciol., 60, 221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG13J176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2014JoG13J176</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Planet Labs: Planet imagery product specifications, available at: <uri>https://assets.planet.com/docs/Planet_Combined_Imagery_Product_Specs_letter_screen.pdf</uri>, last access: 20 September 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Planet Team: Planet Application Program Interface: In Space for Life on Earth. San Francisco, CA, available at: <uri>https://api.planet.com</uri> (last access: 20 September 2021), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Quincey, D. J., Richardson, S. D., Luckman, A., Lucas, R. M., Reynolds, J.
M., Hambrey, M. J., and Glasser, N. F.: Early recognition of glacial lake
hazards in the Himalaya using remote sensing datasets, Global Planet. Change, 56,
137–152, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Quincey, D. J., Luckman, A., and Benn, D.: Quantification of Everest region
glacier velocities between 1992 and 2002, using satellite radar
interferometry and feature tracking, J. Glaciol., 55, 596–606, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Quintano, C., Fernández-Manso, A., Shimabukuro, Y. E., and Pereira, G.:
Spectral unmixing, Int. J. Remote Sens., 33, 5307–5340,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.661095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431161.2012.661095</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Racoviteanu, A. E. and Arnaud, Y.: Spectrometer tests on Mer de Glace, France, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l'Environnement, France, unpublished report, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Racoviteanu, A. E. and Williams, M. W.: Decision tree and texture analysis
for mapping debris-covered glaciers: a case study from Kangchenjunga,
eastern Himalaya, Remote Sens. Special Issue, 4, 3078–3109,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4103078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs4103078</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Racoviteanu, A. E., Arnaud, Y., Williams, M. W., and Manley, W. F.: Spatial patterns in glacier characteristics and area changes from 1962 to 2006 in the Kanchenjunga–Sikkim area, eastern Himalaya, The Cryosphere, 9, 505–523, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-505-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-505-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Racoviteanu, A. E., Nicholson,, L., and Glasser, N.: Supraglacial features of debris covered glaciers in the Himalaya from Landsat-8 spectral umixing and Pleiades, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4421857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4421857</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ragettli, S., Bolch, T., and Pellicciotti, F.: Heterogeneous glacier thinning patterns over the last 40 years in Langtang Himal, Nepal, The Cryosphere, 10, 2075–2097, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2075-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-10-2075-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reid, T. D. and Brock, B. W.: An energy-balance model for debris-covered
glaciers including heat conduction through the debris layer, J. Glaciol.,
56, 903–916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214310794457218" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/002214310794457218</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Reynolds, J.: On the formation of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered
glaciers, in: Debris-covered glaciers, edited by: Nakawo, M., Raymond, C. F., and Fountain,
A., IAHS, Wallingsford, 153–161, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Reynolds, J. M.: Assessing glacial hazards for hydropower development in the
Himalayas, Hindu Kush and Karakoram, Int J. Hydropower Dams, 21, 60–65,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4586?><ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>RGI Consortium: Randolph Glacier Inventory – A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines: Version 6.0: Technical Report, Global Land Ice Measurements from Space, Colorado, USA, Digital Media,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7265/N5-RGI-60" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7265/N5-RGI-60</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Richards, J.: Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis, Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Richardson, S. and Reynolds, J.: An overview of glacial hazards in the
Himalayas, Quaternary Int., 65–66, 31–47,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(99)00035-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1040-6182(99)00035-X</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rieg, L., Klug, C., Nicholson, L., and Sailer, R.: Pléiades Tri-Stereo
Data for Glacier Investigations – Examples from the European Alps and the
Khumbu Himal, Remote Sens., 10, 10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101563" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs10101563</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rittger, K., Painter, T. H., and Dozier, J.: Assessment of methods for
mapping snow cover from MODIS, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 367–380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.002</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roberts, D. A., Smith, M. O., and Adams, J. B.: Green vegetation,
nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data, Remote Sens. Environ.,
44, 255–269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90020-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0034-4257(93)90020-X</ext-link>,
1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenthal, W. and Dozier, J.: Automated Mapping of Montane Snow Cover at
Subpixel Resolution From the Landsat Thematic Mapper, Water Resour. Res., 32,
115–130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR02718" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95WR02718</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rounce, D. R. and McKinney, D. C.: Debris thickness of glaciers in the Everest area (Nepal Himalaya) derived from satellite imagery using a nonlinear energy balance model, The Cryosphere, 8, 1317–1329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1317-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-1317-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rounce, D. R., Quincey, D. J., and McKinney, D. C.: Debris-covered glacier energy balance model for Imja–Lhotse Shar Glacier in the Everest region of Nepal, The Cryosphere, 9, 2295–2310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2295-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-2295-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rounce, D. R., King, O., McCarthy, M., Shean, D. E., and Salerno, F.:
Quantifying Debris Thickness of Debris-Covered Glaciers in the Everest
Region of Nepal Through Inversion of a Subdebris Melt Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 123, 1094–1115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JF004395</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sakai, A.: Glacial lakes in the Himalayas: a review on formation and
expansion processes, Global Environ. Res., 16, 23–30, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sakai, A. and Fujita, K.: Correspondence: Formation conditions of
supraglacial lakes on debris covered glaciers in the Himalaya, J. Glaciol.,
56, 177–181, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sakai, A., Nakawo, M., and Fujita, K.: Distribution Characteristics and
Energy Balance of Ice Cliffs on Debris-Covered Glaciers, Nepal Himalaya,
AAAR, 34, 12–19, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Salerno, F., Thakuri, S., D'Agata, C., Smiraglia, C., Manfredi, E. C.,
Viviano, G., and Tartari, G.: Glacial lake distribution in the Mount Everest
region: Uncertainty of measurement and conditions of formation, Global Planet.
Change, 92–93, 30–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.04.001</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Salerno, F., Thakuri, S., Tartari, G., Nuimura, T., Sunako, S., Sakai, A.,
and Fujita, K.: Debris-covered glacier anomaly? Morphological factors
controlling changes in the mass balance, surface area, terminus position,
and snow line altitude of Himalayan glaciers, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 471,
19–31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.04.039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2017.04.039</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scherler, D., Bookhagen, B., and Strecker, M. R.: Spatially variable
response of Himalayan glaciers to climate change affected by debris cover,
Nat. Geosci., 4, 156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1068</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scherler, D., Wulf, H., and Gorelick, N.: Global Assessment of Supraglacial
Debris-Cover Extents, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11798–11805,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080158" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL080158</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Searle, M. P., Windley, B. F., Coward, M. P., Cooper, D. J. W., Rex, A. J.,
Rex, D., Tingdong, L. I., Xuchang, X., Jan, M. Q., Thakur, V. C., and Kumar,
S.: The closing of Tethys and the tectonics of the Himalaya, GSA Bulletin,
98, 678–701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1987)98&lt;678:TCOTAT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0016-7606(1987)98&lt;678:TCOTAT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sevestre, H. and Benn, D.: Climatic and geometric controls on the global
distribution of surge-type glaciers: Implications for a unifying model of
surging, J. Glaciol., 61, 646–662, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2015JoG14J136</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shean, D. E., Bhushan, S., Montesano, P., Rounce, D. R., Arendt, A., and
Osmanoglu, B.: A Systematic, Regional Assessment of High Mountain Asia
Glacier Mass Balance, Front. Earth Sci., 7, 363,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00363" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2019.00363</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shepherd, J. D. and Dymond, J. R.: Correcting satellite imagery for the
variance of reflectance and illumination with topography, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
24, 3503–3514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160210154029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431160210154029</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shroder, J. F., Bishop, M. P., Copland, L., and Sloan, V. F.: Debris-covered
Glaciers and Rock Glaciers in the Nanga Parbat Himalaya, Pakistan, Geogr. Ann.
Phys. Geogr., 82, 17–31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3676.2000.00108.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.0435-3676.2000.00108.x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shugar, D. H., Burr, A., Haritashya, U. K., Kargel, J. S., Watson, C. S.,
Kennedy, M. C., Bevington, A. R., Betts, R. A., Harrison, S., and Strattman,
K.: Rapid worldwide growth of glacial lakes since 1990, Nat. Clim. Change, 10,
939–945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0855-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-020-0855-4</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shukla, A., Arora, M. K., and Gupta, R. P.: Synergistic approach for mapping
debris-covered glaciers using optical-thermal remote sensing data with
inputs from geomorphometric parameters, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 1378–1387,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shukla, A., Garg, P. K., and Srivastava, S.: Evolution of Glacial and
High-Altitude Lakes in the Sikkim, Eastern Himalaya Over the Past Four
Decades (1975–2017), Front. Env. Science, 6, 81, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fenvs.2018.00081</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sirguey, P., Mathieu, R., and Arnaud, Y.: Subpixel monitoring of the
seasonal snow cover with MODIS at 250 m spatial
resolution in the Southern Alps of New Zealand: Methodology and accuracy
assessment, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 160–181, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.008</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, T., Bookhagen, B., and Cannon, F.: Improving semi-automated glacier mapping with a multi-method approach: applications in central Asia, The Cryosphere, 9, 1747–1759, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1747-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-1747-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sokolova, M. and Lapalme, G.: A systematic analysis of performance measures
for classification tasks, Inform. Process. Manage., 45,
427–437, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Song, C.: Spectral mixture analysis for subpixel vegetation fractions in the
urban environment: How to incorporate endmember variability?, Remote Sens. Environ., 95, 248–263, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.002</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steiner, J., Pellicciotti, F., Buri, P., Miles, E., Immerzeel, W. W., and
Reid, T.: Modelling ice-cliff backwasting on a debris-covere<?pagebreak page4587?>d glacier in the
Nepalese Himalaya, J. Glaciol., 61, 889–907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2015JoG14J194</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steiner, J. F., Buri, P., Miles, E. S., Ragettli, S., and Pellicciotti, F.:
Supraglacial ice cliffs and ponds on debris-covered glaciers:
spatio-temporal distribution and characteristics, J. Glaciol., 65, 617–632,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2019.40" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2019.40</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stillinger, T., Roberts, D. A., Collar, N. M., and Dozier, J.: Cloud Masking
for Landsat 8 and MODIS Terra Over Snow-Covered Terrain: Error Analysis and
Spectral Similarity Between Snow and Cloud, Water Resour. Res., 55, 6169–6184,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024932" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019WR024932</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Strozzi, T., Wiesmann, A., Kääb, A., Joshi, S., and Mool, P.: Glacial lake mapping with very high resolution satellite SAR data, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 2487–2498, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2487-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-12-2487-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib144"><label>144</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Suzuki, R., Fujita, K., and Ageta, Y.: Spatial distribution of thermal
properties on debris-covered glaciers in the Himalayas derived from ASTER
data, Bull. Glacier Res., 24, 13–22, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib145"><label>145</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tadono, T., Ishida, H., Oda, F., Naito, S., Minakawa, K., and Iwamoto, H.:
Precise global DEM generation by ALOS PRISM, ISPRS Ann. Photogr. Remote Sens.,
II-4, 71–76, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-4-71-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/isprsannals-II-4-71-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib146"><label>146</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Takeuchi, Y.,
Kayastha, R., and Nakawo, M.: Characteristics of ablation and heat
balance in debris-free and debris-covered areas on Khumbu Glacier, Nepal
Himalayas, in the pre-monsoon season, in: Debris-covered glacier, edited by:
Nakawo, M., Raymond, C. F., and Fountain, A. G., IAHS Publication no. 264, Wellington, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib147"><label>147</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Takeuchi, N., Kohshima, S., Fujita, K., and Nakawo, M.: Variation in
suspended sediment concentration of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered
area of Lirung Glacier in Nepali Himalayas, Glob. Environ. Res., 16, 95–104, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib148"><label>148</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tampucci, D., Citterio, C., Gobbi, M., and Caccianiga, M.: Vegetation
outlines of a debris-covered glacier descending below the treeline, Plant
Sociol., 53, 43–52, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2016531/03" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7338/pls2016531/03</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib149"><label>149</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Taschner, S. and Ranzi, R.: Landsat-TM and ASTER data for monitoring a
debris covered glacier in the Italian Alps within the GLIMS project, Proc.
IGARSS, 4, 1044–1046, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib150"><label>150</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thakuri, S., Salerno, F., Smiraglia, C., Bolch, T., D'Agata, C., Viviano, G., and Tartari, G.: Tracing glacier changes since the 1960s on the south slope of Mt. Everest (central Southern Himalaya) using optical satellite imagery, The Cryosphere, 8, 1297–1315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1297-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-1297-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib151"><label>151</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thayyen, R. J. and Gergan, J. T.: Role of glaciers in watershed hydrology: a preliminary study of a “Himalayan catchment”, The Cryosphere, 4, 115–128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-115-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-4-115-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib152"><label>152</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thompson, S., Benn, D., Mertes, J., and Luckman, A.: Stagnation and mass
loss on a Himalayan debris-covered glacier: Processes, patterns and rates,
J. Glaciol., 62, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.37" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2016.37</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib153"><label>153</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Thompson, S. S., Benn, D. I., Dennis, K., and Luckman, A.: A rapidly growing
moraine-dammed glacial lake on Ngozumpa Glacier, Nepal, Geomorphology, 145,
1–11, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib154"><label>154</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>USGS: Landsat processing details, available at: <uri>https://landsat.usgs.gov/Landsat-Processing-Details</uri> (last access: 28 March 2019),
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib155"><label>155</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Veganzones, M., Dalla Mura, M., Dumont, M., Zin, I., and Chanussot, J.:
Improved subpixel monitoring of seasonal snow cover: A case study in the
Alps, Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symposium (IGARSS), 3976–3979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947356</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib156"><label>156</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vermote, E. F., Tanre, D., Deuze, J. L., Herman, M., and Morcette, J.:
Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an
overview, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 35, 675–686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.581987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/36.581987</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib157"><label>157</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vezzola, L. C., Diolaiuti, G. A., D'Agata, C., Smiraglia, C., and Pelfini,
M.: Assessing glacier features supporting supraglacial trees: A case study
of the Miage debris-covered Glacier (Italian Alps), The Holocene, 26,
1138–1148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683616632883" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1177/0959683616632883</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib158"><label>158</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wagnon, P., Vincent, C., Arnaud, Y., Berthier, E., Vuillermoz, E., Gruber, S., Ménégoz, M., Gilbert, A., Dumont, M., Shea, J. M., Stumm, D., and Pokhrel, B. K.: Seasonal and annual mass balances of Mera and Pokalde glaciers (Nepal Himalaya) since 2007, The Cryosphere, 7, 1769–1786, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1769-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-1769-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib159"><label>159</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Guo, X., Yang, C., Liu, Q., Wei, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Z., and Tang, Z.: Glacial lake inventory of high-mountain Asia in 1990 and 2018 derived from Landsat images, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2169–2182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2169-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-12-2169-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib160"><label>160</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wangchuk, S. and Bolch, T.: Mapping of glacial lakes using Sentinel-1 and
Sentinel-2 data and a random forest classifier: Strengths and challenges,
Sci. Remote Sens., 2, 100008, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.srs.2020.100008</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib161"><label>161</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Watanabe, O., Iwata, S., and Fushimi, H.: Topographic characteristics in the
ablation area of the Khumbu glacier, Nepal Himalaya, Ann. Glaciol., 8, 177–180, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib162"><label>162</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watson, C. S., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., and Smith, M. W.: The
dynamics of supraglacial ponds in the Everest region, central Himalaya, Global
Planet. Change, 142, 14–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.04.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.04.008</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib163"><label>163</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watson, C. S., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., and Smith, M. W.: Ice cliff
dynamics in the Everest region of the Central Himalaya, Geomorph., 278,
238–251, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.017</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib164"><label>164</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watson, C. S., Quincey, D. J., Smith, M. W., Carrivick, J. L., Rowan, A. V.,
and James, M. R.: Quantifying ice cliff evolution with multi-temporal point
clouds on the debris-covered Khumbu Glacier, Nepal, J. Glaciol., 63,
823–837, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2017.47</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib165"><label>165</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watson, C. S., King, O., Miles, E. S., and Quincey, D. J.: Optimising NDWI
supraglacial pond classification on Himalayan debris-covered glaciers, Remote Sens. Environ., 217, 414–425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.020</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib166"><label>166</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wehn, S., Lundemo, S., and Holten, J. I.: Alpine vegetation along multiple
environmental gradients and possible consequences of climate change, Alp.
Bot., 124, 155–164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-014-0136-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00035-014-0136-9</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib167"><label>167</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wessels, R. L., Kargel, J. S., and Kieffer, H. H.: ASTER measurement of
supraglacial lakes in the Mount Everest region of the Himalaya, Ann. Glaciol.,
34, 399–408, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib168"><label>168</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Westoby, M. J., Glasser, N. F., Brasington, J., Hambrey, M. J., Quincey, D.
J., and Reynolds, J. M.: Modelling outburst flood<?pagebreak page4588?>s from moraine-dammed
glacial lakes, Earth-Sci. Rev., 134, 137–159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.009</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib169"><label>169</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Westoby, M. J., Rounce, D. R., Shaw, T. E., Fyffe, C. L., Moore, P. L.,
Stewart, R. L., and Brock, B. W.: Geomorphological evolution of a
debris-covered glacier surface, Earth Surf. Proc. Landf., 45,
3431–3448, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4973" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.4973</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib170"><label>170</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wulder, M. A., Loveland, T. R., Roy, D. P., Crawford, C. J., Masek, J. G.,
Woodcock, C. E., Allen, R. G., Anderson, M. C., Belward, A. S., Cohen, W.
B., Dwyer, J., Erb, A., Gao, F., Griffiths, P., Helder, D., Hermosilla, T.,
Hipple, J. D., Hostert, P., Hughes, M. J., Huntington, J., Johnson, D. M.,
Kennedy, R., Kilic, A., Li, Z., Lymburner, L., McCorkel, J., Pahlevan, N.,
Scambos, T. A., Schaaf, C., Schott, J. R., Sheng, Y., Storey, J., Vermote,
E., Vogelmann, J., White, J. C., Wynne, R. H., and Zhu, Z.: Current status
of Landsat program, science, and applications, Remote Sens. Environ., 225,
127–147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.015</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib171"><label>171</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, F., Liu, S., Wu, K., Zhu, Y., Gao, Y., Qi, M., Duan, S., Saifullah, M.,
and Tahir, A. A.: Upward Expansion of Supra-Glacial Debris Cover in the
Hunza Valley, Karakoram, during 1990–2019, Front. Earth
Sci., 8, 308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00308" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2020.00308</ext-link>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib172"><label>172</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, Y., Sha, Z., and Yu, M.: Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping:
a review, J. Plant Ecol., 1, 9–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtm005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/jpe/rtm005</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib173"><label>173</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhang, B., Liu, G., Zhang, R., Fu, Y., Liu, Q., Cai, J., Wang, X., and Li,
Z.: Monitoring Dynamic Evolution of the Glacial Lakes by Using Time Series
of Sentinel-1A SAR Images, Remote Sens., 13, 10.3390/rs13071313, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib174"><label>174</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Suhong, L., Qizhong, L., and Jiacheng, S.: Sub-pixel lake mapping
in Tibetan Plateau, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 0-7803-8742-2/04, 3073–3076, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib175"><label>175</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, Z., Wang, S., and Woodcock, C. E.: Improvement and expansion of the
Fmask algorithm: cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection for Landsats 4–7,
8, and Sentinel 2 images, Remote Sens. Environ., 159, 269–277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.12.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2014.12.014</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Surface composition of debris-covered glaciers across the Himalaya using linear spectral unmixing of Landsat 8 OLI imagery</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The Himalaya mountain range is characterized by highly glacierized, complex,
dynamic topography. The ablation area of Himalayan glaciers often features a highly
heterogeneous debris mantle comprising ponds, steep and shallow slopes of
various aspects, variable debris thickness, and exposed ice cliffs
associated with differing ice ablation rates. Understanding the composition
of the supraglacial debris cover is essential for a proper understanding of glacier
hydrology and glacier-related hazards. Until recently, efforts to map
debris-covered glaciers from remote sensing focused primarily on glacier
extent rather than surface characteristics and relied on traditional
whole-pixel image classification techniques. Spectral unmixing routines,
rarely used for debris-covered glaciers, allow decomposition of a pixel into
constituting materials, providing a more realistic representation of glacier
surfaces. Here we use linear spectral unmixing of Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images (30&thinsp;m) to obtain fractional abundance maps of the various supraglacial surfaces
(debris material, clean ice, supraglacial ponds and vegetation) across the
Himalaya around the year 2015. We focus on the debris-covered glacier
extents as defined in the database of global distribution of supraglacial debris cover. The spectrally
unmixed surfaces are subsequently classified to obtain maps of composition
of debris-covered glaciers across sample regions.</p><p>We test the unmixing approach in the Khumbu region of the central Himalaya,
and we evaluate its performance for supraglacial ponds by comparison with
independently mapped ponds from high-resolution Pléiades (2&thinsp;m) and
PlanetScope imagery (3&thinsp;m) for sample glaciers in two other regions with
differing topo-climatic conditions. Spectral unmixing applied over the
entire Himalaya mountain range (a supraglacial debris cover area of 2254&thinsp;km<sup>2</sup>) indicates that at the end of the ablation season, debris-covered
glacier zones comprised 60.9&thinsp;% light debris, 23.8&thinsp;% dark debris, 5.6&thinsp;% clean ice, 4.5&thinsp;% supraglacial vegetation, 2.1&thinsp;% supraglacial
ponds, and small amounts of cloud cover (2&thinsp;%), with 1.2&thinsp;% unclassified
areas. The spectral unmixing performed
satisfactorily for the supraglacial pond and vegetation classes (an F score
of  ∼ 0.9 for both classes) and reasonably for the debris
classes (F score of 0.7).</p><p>Supraglacial ponds were more prevalent in the monsoon-influenced
central-eastern Himalaya (up to 4&thinsp;% of the debris-covered area) compared
to the monsoon-dry transition zone (only 0.3&thinsp;%) and in regions with lower
glacier elevations. Climatic controls (higher average temperatures and more
abundant precipitation), coupled with higher glacier thinning rates and
lower average glacier velocities, further favour pond incidence and the
development of supraglacial vegetation. With continued advances in satellite data and
further method refinements, the approach presented here provides avenues
towards achieving large-scale, repeated mapping of supraglacial features.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alifu, H., Johnson, B., and Tateishi, R.: Delineation of Debris-Covered
Glaciers Based on a Combination of Geomorphometric Parameters and a
TIR/NIR/SWIR Band Ratio, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl., 9, 781–792,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2500906" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2500906</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, L. S., Armstrong, W. H., Anderson, R. S., and Buri, P.: Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska: in situ measurements, automated ice cliff delineation and distributed melt estimates, The Cryosphere, 15, 265–282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-265-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-265-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, P. M.: Mapping sub-pixel boundaries from remotely sensed images, in: Innovations in GIS4, edited by: Zemp, Z., Taylor &amp; Francis, London, 166–180, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, P. M.: Resolution Manipulation and Sub-Pixel Mapping, in: Remote Sensing Image Analysis: Including The Spatial Domain, edited by: Jong, S. M. D. and Meer, F. D. V. D., Springer, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Barros, A. P. and Lang, T. J.: Monitoring the Monsoon in the Himalayas:
Observations in Central Nepal, June 2001, Mon. Weather Rev., 1408–1427, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Benn, D. I., Bolch, T., Hands, K., Gulley, J., Luckman, A., Nicholson, L.
I., Quincey, D., Thompson, S., Toumi, R., and Wiseman, S.: Response of
debris-covered glaciers in the Mount Everest region to recent warming, and
implications for outburst flood hazards, Earth Sci. Rev., 114, 156–174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.03.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.03.008</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bhambri, R., Bolch, T., and Chaujar, R. K.: Mapping of Debris-covered
Glaciers in the Garhwal Himalayas using ASTER DEMs and Thermal Data, Int. J.
Rem. Sens., 32, 8095–8119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.532821" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.532821</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bhambri, R., Bolch, T., Chaujar, R. K., and Kulshreshtha, S. C.: Glacier
changes in the Garhwal Himalaya, India, from 1968 to 2006 based on remote
sensing, J. Glaciol., 57, 543–556, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bishop, M. P., Bonk, R., Kamp, U., and Shroder, J.: Terrain analysis
and data modeling for alpine glacier mapping, Polar Geogr., 25, 182–201,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Blaschke, T., Hay, G. J., Kelly, M., Lang, S., Hofmann, P., Addink, E.,
Queiroz Feitosa, R., van der Meer, F., van der Werff, H., van Coillie, F.,
and Tiede, D.: Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis – Towards a new
paradigm, ISPRS J. Photogram. Rem. Sens., 87, 180–191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.09.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.09.014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bolch, T., Buchroithner, M. F., Kunert, A., and Kamp, U.: Automated
delineation of debris-covered glaciers based on ASTER data, Geoinformation
in Europe, in: Proc. of 27th EARSel Symposium, 4–7 June 2007, Bozen, Italy,
403–410, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bolch, T., Buchroithner, M. F., Pieczonka, T., and Kunert, A.: Planimetric
and Volumetric Glacier Changes in the Khumbu Himalaya since 1962 Using
Corona, Landsat TM and ASTER Data, J. Glaciol., 54, 592–600, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bolch, T., Pieczonka, T., and Benn, D. I.: Multi-decadal mass loss of glaciers in the Everest area (Nepal Himalaya) derived from stereo imagery, The Cryosphere, 5, 349–358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-349-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-349-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Bolch, T., Shea, J. M., Liu, S., Azam, F. M., Gao, Y., Gruber, S.,
Immerzeel, W. W., Kulkarni, A., Li, H., Tahir, A. A., Zhang, G., and Zhang,
Y.: Status and Change of the Cryosphere in the Extended Hindu Kush Himalaya
Region, in: The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment: Mountains, Climate Change,
Sustainability and People, edited by: Wester, P., Mishra, A., Mukherji, A.,
and Shrestha, A. B., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 209–255, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Bookhagen, B. and Burbank, D. W.: Topography, relief and TRMM-derived
rainfall variations along the Himalaya, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L08405,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026037</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Bookhagen, B. and Burbank, D. W.: Toward a complete Himalyan hydrological
budget: spatiotemporal distribution of snowmlet ad rainfall and their impact
on river discharge, J. Geophys. Res., 115, F03019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001426" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001426</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Brun, F., Buri, P., Miles, E. S., Wagnon, P., Steiner, J., Berthier, E.,
Ragettli, S., Kraaijenbrink, P., Immerzeel, W. W., and Pellicciotti, F.:
Quantifying volume loss from ice cliffs on debris-covered glaciers using
high-resolution terrestrial and aerial photogrammetry, J. Glaciol., 62,
684–695, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.54" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.54</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Brun, F., Berthier, E., Wagnon, P., Kääb, A., and Treichler, D.: A
spatially resolved estimate of High Mountain Asia glacier mass balances from
2000 to 2016, Nat. Geosci., 10, 668–673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2999</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Brun, F., Wagnon, P., Berthier, E., Shea, J. M., Immerzeel, W. W., Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Vincent, C., Reverchon, C., Shrestha, D., and Arnaud, Y.: Ice cliff contribution to the tongue-wide ablation of Changri Nup Glacier, Nepal, central Himalaya, The Cryosphere, 12, 3439–3457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3439-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3439-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Brun, F., Wagnon, P., Berthier, E., Jomelli, V., Maharjan, S. B., Shrestha,
F., and Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A.: Heterogeneous Influence of Glacier
Morphology on the Mass Balance Variability in High Mountain Asia, J. Geophys.
Res.-Earth Surf., 124, 1331–1345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004838" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004838</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Bunting, P., Clewley, D., Lucas, R., and Gillingham, S.: The Remote Sensing
and GIS Software Library (RSGISLib), Comput. Geosci., 62, 216–226, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Buri, P., Miles, E. S., Steiner, J. F., Immerzeel, W. W., Wagnon, P., and
Pellicciotti, F.: A physically based 3-D model of ice cliff evolution over
debris-covered glaciers, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 121, 2471–2493,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF004039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF004039</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Casey, K. and Kääb, A.: Estimation of Supraglacial Dust and Debris
Geochemical Composition via Satellite Reflectance and Emissivity, Remote Sens.,
4, 2554–2575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4092554" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4092554</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Casey, K. A., Kääb, A., and Benn, D. I.: Geochemical characterization of supraglacial debris via in situ and optical remote sensing methods: a case study in Khumbu Himalaya, Nepal, The Cryosphere, 6, 85–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-85-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-85-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Chand, B. M. and Watanabe, T.: Development of Supraglacial Ponds in the
Everest Region, Nepal, between 1989 and 2018, Remote Sens., 11, 9,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11091058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11091058</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, F., Zhang, M., Guo, H., Allen, S., Kargel, J. S., Haritashya, U. K., and Watson, C. S.: Annual 30&thinsp;m dataset for glacial lakes in High Mountain Asia from 2008 to 2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 741–766, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-741-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-741-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Collier, E., Nicholson, L. I., Brock, B. W., Maussion, F., Essery, R., and Bush, A. B. G.: Representing moisture fluxes and phase changes in glacier debris cover using a reservoir approach, The Cryosphere, 8, 1429–1444, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1429-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1429-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Cortés, G., Girotto, M., and Margulis, S. A.: Analysis of sub-pixel snow
and ice extent over the extratropical Andes using spectral unmixing of
historical Landsat imagery, Remote Sens. Environ., 141, 64–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.023</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Dehecq, A., Gourmelen, N., and Trouve, E.: Deriving large-scale glacier
velocities from a complete satellite archive: Application to the
Pamir-Karakoram-Himalaya, Remote Sens. Environ., 162, 55–66,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.031</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Dehecq, A., Gourmelen, N., Gardner, A. S., Brun, F., Goldberg, D., Nienow,
P. W., Berthier, E., Vincent, C., Wagnon, P., and Trouvé, E.:
Twenty-first century glacier slowdown driven by mass loss in High Mountain
Asia, Nat. Geosci., 12, 22–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0271-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0271-9</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Delafontaine, M., Nolf, G., van de Weghe, N., Antrop, M., and de Maeyer, P.:
Assessment of sliver polygons in geographical vector data, Int. J. Geogr. Inf.
Sci., 23, 719–735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701694838" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701694838</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Dixit, A. and Agarwal, S.: Non-linear spectral unmixing of hyperspectral
data using Modified PPNMM, Appl. Comput. Geosci., 9, 100053,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2021.100053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2021.100053</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
ERDAS:  LPS Project Manager User's Guide, Norcross, GA, USA, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Ettritch, G., Bunting, P., Jones, G., and Hardy, A.: Monitoring the coastal
zone using earth observation: application of linear spectral unmixing to
coastal dune systems in Wales, Remote Sens. Ecol. Cons., 4, 303–319,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.79" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.79</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Evatt, G. W., Abrahams, D., Heil, M., Mayer, C., Kingslake, J., Mitchell, S.
L., Fowler, A. C., and Clark, C. D.: Glacial melt under a porous debris
layer, J. Glaciol., 61, 229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J235</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Evatt, G. W., Mayer, C., Mallinson, A. M. Y., Abrahams, I. D., Heil, M., and
Nicholson, L.: The secret life of ice sails, J. Glaciol., 63, 1049–1062,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.72" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.72</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Fickert, T., Friend, D., Grüninger, F., Molnia, B., and Richter, M.: Did
Debris-Covered Glaciers Serve as Pleistocene Refugia for Plants? A New
Hypothesis Derived from Observations of Recent Plant Growth on Glacier
Surfaces, AAAR, 39, 245–257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(2007)39[245:DDGSAP]2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(2007)39[245:DDGSAP]2.0.CO;2</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Foody, G. M.: Sub-pixel methods in remote sensing, in:Remote sensing image analysis: including the spatial domain, edited by: de Jong, S. M. and van der Meer, F. D., Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 37–49, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Foster, L. A., Brock, B. W., Cutler, M. E. J., and Diotri, F.: A physically
based method for estimating supraglacial debris thickness from thermal band
remote-sensing data, J. Glaciol., 58, 677–690, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
GAPHAZ: Assessment of Glacier and Permafrost Hazards in Mountain Regions –
Technical Guidance Document, Zurich, Switzerland/Lima, Peru, 72, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Gardelle, J., Arnaud, Y., and Berthier, E.: Contrasted evolution of glacial
lakes along the Hindu Kush Himalaya mountain range between 1990 and 2009,
Global Planet. Change, 75, 1–2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.10.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.10.003</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Gardelle, J., Berthier, E., Arnaud, Y., and Kääb, A.: Region-wide glacier mass balances over the Pamir-Karakoram-Himalaya during 1999–2011, The Cryosphere, 7, 1263–1286, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1263-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1263-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Giardino, C., Oggioni, A., Bresciani, M., and Yan, H.: Remote Sensing of
Suspended Particulate Matter in Himalayan Lakes, Mt. Res. Dev., 30, 157–168,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00042.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00042.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R., Welton, E. J., Korkin, S. V., and Lyapustin, A. I.: Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 169–209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Gillespie, A. R., Smith, M. O., Adams, J. B., Willis, S. C., Fischer, A. F.,
III,, and Sabol, D. E.: Interpretation of residual images: spectral mixture
analysis of AVIRIS images, Owens Valley, California, Proceedings of the
Second Air- borne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Workshop, 243–270,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Gillingham, S. S., Flood, N., and Gill, T. K.: On determining appropriate
aerosol optical depth values for atmospheric correction of satellite imagery
for biophysical parameter retrieval: requirements and limitations under
Australian conditions, Int. J. Remote Sens., 34, 2089–2100,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.738945" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.738945</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Green, A. A., Berman, M., Switzer, P., and Craig, M. D.: A transformation
for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications
for noise removal, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 26, 65–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.3001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/36.3001</a>,
1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, D. K. R., George, A., Salomonson, V. V., DiGirolamo, N. E.,
and Bayr, K. J.: MODIS Snow-Cover Products, Remote Sens. Env, 83, 88–89,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Harris Geospatial: ENVI Feature Extraction module, available at: <a href="https://www.l3harrisgeospatial.com/Portals/0/pdfs/HG_ENVI_FX_module_data-sheet_WEB.pdf" target="_blank"/>, last access: 25 April 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Herreid, S. and Pellicciotti, F.: Automated detection of ice cliffs within supraglacial debris cover, The Cryosphere, 12, 1811–1829, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1811-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1811-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Herreid, S. and Pellicciotti, F.: The state of rock debris covering Earth's
glaciers, Nat. Geosci., 13, 621–627, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0615-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0615-0</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Irons, J. R., Dwyer, J. L., and Barsi, J. A.: The next Landsat satellite:
The Landsat Data Continuity Mission, Remote Sens. Environ., 122, 11–21,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.026</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Irvine-Fynn, T. D. L., Porter, P. R., Rowan, A. V., Quincey, D. J., Gibson,
M. J., Bridge, J. W., Watson, C. S., Hubbard, A., and Glasser, N. F.:
Supraglacial ponds regulate runoff from Himalayan debris-covered glaciers,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 11894–11904, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075398</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Iwata, S., Watanabe, O., and Fushimi, H.: Surface morphology in the ablation
area of the Khumbu glacier, J. Japan Soc. Snow Ice (Seppyo), 41, 9–17,
1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Iwata, S., Aoki, T., Kadota, T., Seko, K., and Yamaguchi, S.: Morphological
evolution of the debris cover on Khumbu Glacier, Nepal, between 1978 and
1995, in: Debris-covered glaciers, edited by: Nakawo, M., Raymond, C. F.,
and Fountain, A., IAHS, IAHS Publication no. 264, Wallingford, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
JAXA: ALOS Global Digital Surface Model “ALOS World 3D – 30m”, available at: <a href="https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/aw3d30/data/index.htm" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 September 2021), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, D. B., Harrison, S., and Anderson, K.: Mountain glacier-to-rock glacier transition, Global Planet. Change, 181, 102999, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.102999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.102999</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Juen, M., Mayer, C., Lambrecht, A., Wirbel, A., and Kueppers, U.: Thermal
properties of a supraglacial debris layer with respect to lithology and
grain size, Geogr. Ann. Phys. Geogr., 95, 197–209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12011</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Kääb, A., Berthier, E., Nuth, C., Gardelle, J., and Arnaud, Y.:
Contrasting patterns of early twenty-first-century glacier mass change in
the Himalayas, Nature, 488, 495–498, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11324" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11324</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Kamp, U., Byrne, M., and Bolch, T.: Glacier fluctuations between 1975 and
2008 in the Greater Himalaya Range of Zanskar, southern Ladakh, J. Mt. Sci., 8,
374–389, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Kayastha, R. B., Takeuchi, Y., Nakawo, M., and Ageta, Y.: Practical
prediction of ice melting beneath various thickness of debris cover on
Khumbu Glacier, Nepal, using a positive degree-day factor, in:
Debris-Covered Glaciers, edited by: Raymond, C. F., Nakawo, M., Fountain,
A., IAHS, Wallingford, UK, 71–81, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Keshava, N. and Mustard, J. F.: Spectral unmixing, IEEE Signal Processing
Magazine, 19, 44–57, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/79.974727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/79.974727</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkbride, M.: About the concepts of continuum and age, Boreas, 18, 87–88,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1989.tb00376.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1989.tb00376.x</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkbride, M. P.: Debris-Covered Glaciers, in: Encyclopedia of Snow, Ice and
Glaciers, edited by: Singh, V. P., Singh, P., and Haritashya, U. K.,
Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 180–182, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Klein, A. G. and Isacks, B. L.: Spectral mixture analysis of Landsat
thematic mapper images applied to the detection of the transient snowline on
tropical Andean glaciers, Global Planet. Change, 22, 139–154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(99)00032-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(99)00032-6</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Kneib, M., Miles, E. S., Jola, S., Buri, P., Herreid, S., Bhattacharya, A.,
Watson, C. S., Bolch, T., Quincey, D., and Pellicciotti, F.: Mapping ice
cliffs on debris-covered glaciers using multispectral satellite images, Remote Sens. Environ., 253, 112201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112201</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Knight, J., Harrison, S., and Jones, D. B.: Rock glaciers and the
geomorphological evolution of deglacierizing mountains, Geomorphology, 324,
14–24, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Komori, J.: Recent expansions of glacial lakes in the Bhutan Himalayas,
Quaternary Int., 184, 177–186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.09.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.09.012</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Shea, J. M., Pellicciotti, F., Jong, S. M. D., and
Immerzeel, W. W.: Object-based analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery
to map and characterise surface features on a debris-covered glacier, Remote Sens. Environ., 186, 581–595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.09.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.09.013</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Leprince, S., Ayoub, F., Klinger, Y., and Avouac, J.: Co-Registration of
Optically Sensed Images and Correlation (COSI-Corr): an operational
methodology for ground deformation measurements, IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens.
Symposium, Barcelona, Spain, 1943–1946, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Q., Mayer, C., and Liu, S.: Distribution and interannual variability of
supraglacial lakes on debris-covered glaciers in the Khan Tengri-Tumor
Mountains, Central Asia, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 014014,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014014</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Matta, E., Giardino, C., Boggero, A., and Bresciani, M.: Use of Satellite
and In Situ Reflectance Data for Lake Water Color Characterization in the
Everest Himalayan Region, Mt. Res. Dev., 37, 16–23,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00052.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00052.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Maurer, J. M., Schaefer, J. M., Rupper, S., and Corley, A.: Acceleration of
ice loss across the Himalayas over the past 40 years, Sci. Adv., 5, eaav7266,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7266</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Miles, E. S., Pellicciotti, F., Willis, I. C., Steiner, J. F., Buri, P., and
Arnold, N. S.: Refined energy-balance modelling of a supraglacial pond,
Langtang Khola, Nepal, Ann. Glaciol., 57, 29–40, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2016AoG71A421" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2016AoG71A421</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Miles, E. S., Steiner, J., Willis, I., Buri, P., Immerzeel, W. W.,
Chesnokova, A., and Pellicciotti, F.: Pond Dynamics and
Supraglacial-Englacial Connectivity on Debris-Covered Lirung Glacier, Nepal,
Front. Earth Sci., 5, 69, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00069</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Miles, E. S., Willis, I. C., Arnold, N. S., Steiner, J., and Pellicciotti,
F.: Spatial, seasonal and interannual variability of supraglacial ponds in
the Langtang Valley of Nepal, 1999–2013, J. Glaciol., 63, 88–105, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Miles, E. S., Willis, I., Buri, P., Steiner, J. F., Arnold, N. S., and
Pellicciotti, F.: Surface Pond Energy Absorption Across Four Himalayan
Glaciers Accounts for 1/8 of Total Catchment Ice Loss, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
10464–10473, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079678" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079678</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Mölg, N., Bolch, T., Walter, A., and Vieli, A.: Unravelling the evolution of Zmuttgletscher and its debris cover since the end of the Little Ice Age, The Cryosphere, 13, 1889–1909, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1889-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1889-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Monnier, S. and Kinnard, C.: Pluri-decadal (1955–2014) evolution of glacier–rock glacier transitional landforms in the central Andes of Chile (30–33°&thinsp;S), Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 493–509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-493-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-493-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Mukul, M., Srivastava, V., Jade, S., and Mukul, M.: Uncertainties in the
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Heights: Insights from the Indian
Himalaya and Peninsula, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 41672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41672" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41672</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Muñoz-Sabater, J.: ERA5-Land monthly averaged data from 1981 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.68d2bb3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.68d2bb3</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Naegeli, K., Damm, A., Huss, M., Schaepman, M., and Hoelzle, M.: Imaging
spectroscopy to assess the composition of ice surface materials and their
impact on glacier mass balance, Remote Sens. Environ., 168, 388–402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.006</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Naegeli, K., Damm, A., Huss, M., Wulf, H., Schaepman, M., and Hoelzle, M.:
Cross-Comparison of Albedo Products for Glacier Surfaces Derived from
Airborne and Satellite (Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8) Optical Data, Remote Sens., 9, 2,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020110</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Nakawo, M., Yabuki, H., and Sakai, A.: Characteristics of Khumbu Glacier,
Nepal Himalaya: recent change in the debris-covered area,
Ann. Glaciol., 28, 118–122, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Narama, C., Daiyrov, M., Tadono, T., Yamamoto, M., Kääb, A., Morita,
R., and Ukita, J.: Seasonal drainage of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered
glaciers in the Tien Shan Mountains, Central Asia, Geomorphology, 286,
133–142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.002</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Nicholson, L. and Benn, D. I.: Calculating ice melt beneath a debris layer
using meteorological data, J. Glaciol., 52, 463–470,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756506781828584" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756506781828584</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Nicholson, L. I., McCarthy, M., Pritchard, H. D., and Willis, I.: Supraglacial debris thickness variability: impact on ablation and relation to terrain properties, The Cryosphere, 12, 3719–3734, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3719-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3719-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Nie, Y., Sheng, Y., Liu, Q., Liu, L., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., and Song, C.: A
regional-scale assessment of Himalayan glacial lake changes using satellite
observations from 1990 to 2015, Remote Sens. Environ., 189, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.008</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Nuimura, T., Fujita, K., Yamaguchi, S., and Sharma, R. R.: Elevation changes
of glaciers revealed by multitemporal digital elevation models calibrated by
GPS survey in the Khumbu region, Nepal Himalaya, 1992–2008, J. Glaciol., 58,
648–656, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Østrem, G.: Ice Melting under a Thin Layer of Moraine, and the Existence
of Ice Cores in Moraine Ridges, Geografiska Annaler, 41, 228–230, 1959.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H., Dozier, J., Roberts, D. A., Davis, R. E.,
and Green, R. O.: Retrieval of subpixel snow-covered area and grain size from imaging
spectrometer data, Remote Sens. Environ., 85, 64–77, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H., Rittger, K., McKenzie, C., Slaughter, P., Davis, R. E., and
Dozier, J.: Retrieval of subpixel snow covered area, grain size, and albedo
from MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 868–879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.001</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H., Brodzik, M. J., Racoviteanu, A., and Armstrong, R.:
Automated mapping of Earth's annual minimum exposed snow and ice with MODIS,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053340" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053340</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Panday, P., Bulley, H., Haritashya, U., and Ghimire, B.: Supraglacial Lake
Classification in the Everest Region of Nepal Himalaya, in: Geospatial
Techniques for Managing Environmental Resources, edited by: Thakur, J. K., Singh, S. K., Ramanathan, A., Prasad, M. B. K., and Gossel, W., Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F., Huggel, C., and Kääb, A.: Combining satellite
multispectral image data and a digital elevation model for mapping
debris-covered glaciers, Remote Sens. Environ., 89, 510–518, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., and Belward, A. S.: High-resolution
mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes, Nature, 540,
418–422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Pfeffer, W. T., Arendt, A. A., Bliss, A., Bolch, T., Cogley, J. G., Gardner,
A. S., Hagen, J. O., Hock, R., Kaser, G., Kienholz, C., Miles, E. S.,
Moholdt, G., Mölg, N., Paul, F., Radić, V., Rastner, P., Raup, B.
H., Rich, J., Sharp, M. J., and Randolph_Consortium: The
Randolph Glacier Inventory: a globally complete inventory of glaciers, J.
Glaciol., 60, 221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG13J176" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG13J176</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Planet Labs: Planet imagery product specifications, available at: <a href="https://assets.planet.com/docs/Planet_Combined_Imagery_Product_Specs_letter_screen.pdf" target="_blank"/>, last access: 20 September 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Planet Team: Planet Application Program Interface: In Space for Life on Earth. San Francisco, CA, available at: <a href="https://api.planet.com" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 September 2021), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Quincey, D. J., Richardson, S. D., Luckman, A., Lucas, R. M., Reynolds, J.
M., Hambrey, M. J., and Glasser, N. F.: Early recognition of glacial lake
hazards in the Himalaya using remote sensing datasets, Global Planet. Change, 56,
137–152, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Quincey, D. J., Luckman, A., and Benn, D.: Quantification of Everest region
glacier velocities between 1992 and 2002, using satellite radar
interferometry and feature tracking, J. Glaciol., 55, 596–606, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Quintano, C., Fernández-Manso, A., Shimabukuro, Y. E., and Pereira, G.:
Spectral unmixing, Int. J. Remote Sens., 33, 5307–5340,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.661095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.661095</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Racoviteanu, A. E. and Arnaud, Y.: Spectrometer tests on Mer de Glace, France, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l'Environnement, France, unpublished report, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Racoviteanu, A. E. and Williams, M. W.: Decision tree and texture analysis
for mapping debris-covered glaciers: a case study from Kangchenjunga,
eastern Himalaya, Remote Sens. Special Issue, 4, 3078–3109,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4103078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4103078</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Racoviteanu, A. E., Arnaud, Y., Williams, M. W., and Manley, W. F.: Spatial patterns in glacier characteristics and area changes from 1962 to 2006 in the Kanchenjunga–Sikkim area, eastern Himalaya, The Cryosphere, 9, 505–523, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-505-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-505-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Racoviteanu, A. E., Nicholson,, L., and Glasser, N.: Supraglacial features of debris covered glaciers in the Himalaya from Landsat-8 spectral umixing and Pleiades, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4421857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4421857</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Ragettli, S., Bolch, T., and Pellicciotti, F.: Heterogeneous glacier thinning patterns over the last 40 years in Langtang Himal, Nepal, The Cryosphere, 10, 2075–2097, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2075-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2075-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, T. D. and Brock, B. W.: An energy-balance model for debris-covered
glaciers including heat conduction through the debris layer, J. Glaciol.,
56, 903–916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214310794457218" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/002214310794457218</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Reynolds, J.: On the formation of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered
glaciers, in: Debris-covered glaciers, edited by: Nakawo, M., Raymond, C. F., and Fountain,
A., IAHS, Wallingsford, 153–161, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Reynolds, J. M.: Assessing glacial hazards for hydropower development in the
Himalayas, Hindu Kush and Karakoram, Int J. Hydropower Dams, 21, 60–65,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
RGI Consortium: Randolph Glacier Inventory – A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines: Version 6.0: Technical Report, Global Land Ice Measurements from Space, Colorado, USA, Digital Media,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.7265/N5-RGI-60" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7265/N5-RGI-60</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Richards, J.: Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis, Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, S. and Reynolds, J.: An overview of glacial hazards in the
Himalayas, Quaternary Int., 65–66, 31–47,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(99)00035-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(99)00035-X</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Rieg, L., Klug, C., Nicholson, L., and Sailer, R.: Pléiades Tri-Stereo
Data for Glacier Investigations – Examples from the European Alps and the
Khumbu Himal, Remote Sens., 10, 10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101563" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101563</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Rittger, K., Painter, T. H., and Dozier, J.: Assessment of methods for
mapping snow cover from MODIS, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 367–380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.002</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Roberts, D. A., Smith, M. O., and Adams, J. B.: Green vegetation,
nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data, Remote Sens. Environ.,
44, 255–269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90020-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90020-X</a>,
1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenthal, W. and Dozier, J.: Automated Mapping of Montane Snow Cover at
Subpixel Resolution From the Landsat Thematic Mapper, Water Resour. Res., 32,
115–130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR02718" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR02718</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Rounce, D. R. and McKinney, D. C.: Debris thickness of glaciers in the Everest area (Nepal Himalaya) derived from satellite imagery using a nonlinear energy balance model, The Cryosphere, 8, 1317–1329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1317-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1317-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Rounce, D. R., Quincey, D. J., and McKinney, D. C.: Debris-covered glacier energy balance model for Imja–Lhotse Shar Glacier in the Everest region of Nepal, The Cryosphere, 9, 2295–2310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2295-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2295-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Rounce, D. R., King, O., McCarthy, M., Shean, D. E., and Salerno, F.:
Quantifying Debris Thickness of Debris-Covered Glaciers in the Everest
Region of Nepal Through Inversion of a Subdebris Melt Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 123, 1094–1115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004395" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004395</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Sakai, A.: Glacial lakes in the Himalayas: a review on formation and
expansion processes, Global Environ. Res., 16, 23–30, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Sakai, A. and Fujita, K.: Correspondence: Formation conditions of
supraglacial lakes on debris covered glaciers in the Himalaya, J. Glaciol.,
56, 177–181, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Sakai, A., Nakawo, M., and Fujita, K.: Distribution Characteristics and
Energy Balance of Ice Cliffs on Debris-Covered Glaciers, Nepal Himalaya,
AAAR, 34, 12–19, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Salerno, F., Thakuri, S., D'Agata, C., Smiraglia, C., Manfredi, E. C.,
Viviano, G., and Tartari, G.: Glacial lake distribution in the Mount Everest
region: Uncertainty of measurement and conditions of formation, Global Planet.
Change, 92–93, 30–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.04.001</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Salerno, F., Thakuri, S., Tartari, G., Nuimura, T., Sunako, S., Sakai, A.,
and Fujita, K.: Debris-covered glacier anomaly? Morphological factors
controlling changes in the mass balance, surface area, terminus position,
and snow line altitude of Himalayan glaciers, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 471,
19–31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.04.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.04.039</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Scherler, D., Bookhagen, B., and Strecker, M. R.: Spatially variable
response of Himalayan glaciers to climate change affected by debris cover,
Nat. Geosci., 4, 156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1068</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Scherler, D., Wulf, H., and Gorelick, N.: Global Assessment of Supraglacial
Debris-Cover Extents, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11798–11805,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080158" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080158</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
Searle, M. P., Windley, B. F., Coward, M. P., Cooper, D. J. W., Rex, A. J.,
Rex, D., Tingdong, L. I., Xuchang, X., Jan, M. Q., Thakur, V. C., and Kumar,
S.: The closing of Tethys and the tectonics of the Himalaya, GSA Bulletin,
98, 678–701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1987)98&lt;678:TCOTAT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1987)98&lt;678:TCOTAT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>
Sevestre, H. and Benn, D.: Climatic and geometric controls on the global
distribution of surge-type glaciers: Implications for a unifying model of
surging, J. Glaciol., 61, 646–662, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J136" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J136</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>
Shean, D. E., Bhushan, S., Montesano, P., Rounce, D. R., Arendt, A., and
Osmanoglu, B.: A Systematic, Regional Assessment of High Mountain Asia
Glacier Mass Balance, Front. Earth Sci., 7, 363,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00363" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00363</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>
Shepherd, J. D. and Dymond, J. R.: Correcting satellite imagery for the
variance of reflectance and illumination with topography, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
24, 3503–3514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160210154029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160210154029</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>
Shroder, J. F., Bishop, M. P., Copland, L., and Sloan, V. F.: Debris-covered
Glaciers and Rock Glaciers in the Nanga Parbat Himalaya, Pakistan, Geogr. Ann.
Phys. Geogr., 82, 17–31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3676.2000.00108.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3676.2000.00108.x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>
Shugar, D. H., Burr, A., Haritashya, U. K., Kargel, J. S., Watson, C. S.,
Kennedy, M. C., Bevington, A. R., Betts, R. A., Harrison, S., and Strattman,
K.: Rapid worldwide growth of glacial lakes since 1990, Nat. Clim. Change, 10,
939–945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0855-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0855-4</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>
Shukla, A., Arora, M. K., and Gupta, R. P.: Synergistic approach for mapping
debris-covered glaciers using optical-thermal remote sensing data with
inputs from geomorphometric parameters, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 1378–1387,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>
Shukla, A., Garg, P. K., and Srivastava, S.: Evolution of Glacial and
High-Altitude Lakes in the Sikkim, Eastern Himalaya Over the Past Four
Decades (1975–2017), Front. Env. Science, 6, 81, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00081</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>
Sirguey, P., Mathieu, R., and Arnaud, Y.: Subpixel monitoring of the
seasonal snow cover with MODIS at 250&thinsp;m spatial
resolution in the Southern Alps of New Zealand: Methodology and accuracy
assessment, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 160–181, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.008</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, T., Bookhagen, B., and Cannon, F.: Improving semi-automated glacier mapping with a multi-method approach: applications in central Asia, The Cryosphere, 9, 1747–1759, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1747-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1747-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation>
Sokolova, M. and Lapalme, G.: A systematic analysis of performance measures
for classification tasks, Inform. Process. Manage., 45,
427–437, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation>
Song, C.: Spectral mixture analysis for subpixel vegetation fractions in the
urban environment: How to incorporate endmember variability?, Remote Sens. Environ., 95, 248–263, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.002</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation>
Steiner, J., Pellicciotti, F., Buri, P., Miles, E., Immerzeel, W. W., and
Reid, T.: Modelling ice-cliff backwasting on a debris-covered glacier in the
Nepalese Himalaya, J. Glaciol., 61, 889–907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J194</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation>
Steiner, J. F., Buri, P., Miles, E. S., Ragettli, S., and Pellicciotti, F.:
Supraglacial ice cliffs and ponds on debris-covered glaciers:
spatio-temporal distribution and characteristics, J. Glaciol., 65, 617–632,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2019.40" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2019.40</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><mixed-citation>
Stillinger, T., Roberts, D. A., Collar, N. M., and Dozier, J.: Cloud Masking
for Landsat 8 and MODIS Terra Over Snow-Covered Terrain: Error Analysis and
Spectral Similarity Between Snow and Cloud, Water Resour. Res., 55, 6169–6184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024932" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024932</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><mixed-citation>
Strozzi, T., Wiesmann, A., Kääb, A., Joshi, S., and Mool, P.: Glacial lake mapping with very high resolution satellite SAR data, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 2487–2498, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2487-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2487-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib144"><label>144</label><mixed-citation>
Suzuki, R., Fujita, K., and Ageta, Y.: Spatial distribution of thermal
properties on debris-covered glaciers in the Himalayas derived from ASTER
data, Bull. Glacier Res., 24, 13–22, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib145"><label>145</label><mixed-citation>
Tadono, T., Ishida, H., Oda, F., Naito, S., Minakawa, K., and Iwamoto, H.:
Precise global DEM generation by ALOS PRISM, ISPRS Ann. Photogr. Remote Sens.,
II-4, 71–76, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-4-71-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-4-71-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib146"><label>146</label><mixed-citation>
Takeuchi, Y.,
Kayastha, R., and Nakawo, M.: Characteristics of ablation and heat
balance in debris-free and debris-covered areas on Khumbu Glacier, Nepal
Himalayas, in the pre-monsoon season, in: Debris-covered glacier, edited by:
Nakawo, M., Raymond, C. F., and Fountain, A. G., IAHS Publication no. 264, Wellington, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib147"><label>147</label><mixed-citation>
Takeuchi, N., Kohshima, S., Fujita, K., and Nakawo, M.: Variation in
suspended sediment concentration of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered
area of Lirung Glacier in Nepali Himalayas, Glob. Environ. Res., 16, 95–104, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib148"><label>148</label><mixed-citation>
Tampucci, D., Citterio, C., Gobbi, M., and Caccianiga, M.: Vegetation
outlines of a debris-covered glacier descending below the treeline, Plant
Sociol., 53, 43–52, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2016531/03" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2016531/03</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib149"><label>149</label><mixed-citation>
Taschner, S. and Ranzi, R.: Landsat-TM and ASTER data for monitoring a
debris covered glacier in the Italian Alps within the GLIMS project, Proc.
IGARSS, 4, 1044–1046, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib150"><label>150</label><mixed-citation>
Thakuri, S., Salerno, F., Smiraglia, C., Bolch, T., D'Agata, C., Viviano, G., and Tartari, G.: Tracing glacier changes since the 1960s on the south slope of Mt. Everest (central Southern Himalaya) using optical satellite imagery, The Cryosphere, 8, 1297–1315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1297-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1297-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib151"><label>151</label><mixed-citation>
Thayyen, R. J. and Gergan, J. T.: Role of glaciers in watershed hydrology: a preliminary study of a “Himalayan catchment”, The Cryosphere, 4, 115–128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-115-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-115-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib152"><label>152</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, S., Benn, D., Mertes, J., and Luckman, A.: Stagnation and mass
loss on a Himalayan debris-covered glacier: Processes, patterns and rates,
J. Glaciol., 62, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.37" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.37</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib153"><label>153</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, S. S., Benn, D. I., Dennis, K., and Luckman, A.: A rapidly growing
moraine-dammed glacial lake on Ngozumpa Glacier, Nepal, Geomorphology, 145,
1–11, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib154"><label>154</label><mixed-citation>
USGS: Landsat processing details, available at: <a href="https://landsat.usgs.gov/Landsat-Processing-Details" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 March 2019),
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib155"><label>155</label><mixed-citation>
Veganzones, M., Dalla Mura, M., Dumont, M., Zin, I., and Chanussot, J.:
Improved subpixel monitoring of seasonal snow cover: A case study in the
Alps, Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symposium (IGARSS), 3976–3979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947356</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib156"><label>156</label><mixed-citation>
Vermote, E. F., Tanre, D., Deuze, J. L., Herman, M., and Morcette, J.:
Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an
overview, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 35, 675–686, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.581987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/36.581987</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib157"><label>157</label><mixed-citation>
Vezzola, L. C., Diolaiuti, G. A., D'Agata, C., Smiraglia, C., and Pelfini,
M.: Assessing glacier features supporting supraglacial trees: A case study
of the Miage debris-covered Glacier (Italian Alps), The Holocene, 26,
1138–1148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683616632883" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683616632883</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib158"><label>158</label><mixed-citation>
Wagnon, P., Vincent, C., Arnaud, Y., Berthier, E., Vuillermoz, E., Gruber, S., Ménégoz, M., Gilbert, A., Dumont, M., Shea, J. M., Stumm, D., and Pokhrel, B. K.: Seasonal and annual mass balances of Mera and Pokalde glaciers (Nepal Himalaya) since 2007, The Cryosphere, 7, 1769–1786, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1769-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1769-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib159"><label>159</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Guo, X., Yang, C., Liu, Q., Wei, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Z., and Tang, Z.: Glacial lake inventory of high-mountain Asia in 1990 and 2018 derived from Landsat images, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2169–2182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2169-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2169-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib160"><label>160</label><mixed-citation>
Wangchuk, S. and Bolch, T.: Mapping of glacial lakes using Sentinel-1 and
Sentinel-2 data and a random forest classifier: Strengths and challenges,
Sci. Remote Sens., 2, 100008, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100008</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib161"><label>161</label><mixed-citation>
Watanabe, O., Iwata, S., and Fushimi, H.: Topographic characteristics in the
ablation area of the Khumbu glacier, Nepal Himalaya, Ann. Glaciol., 8, 177–180, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib162"><label>162</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, C. S., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., and Smith, M. W.: The
dynamics of supraglacial ponds in the Everest region, central Himalaya, Global
Planet. Change, 142, 14–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.04.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.04.008</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib163"><label>163</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, C. S., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., and Smith, M. W.: Ice cliff
dynamics in the Everest region of the Central Himalaya, Geomorph., 278,
238–251, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.017</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib164"><label>164</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, C. S., Quincey, D. J., Smith, M. W., Carrivick, J. L., Rowan, A. V.,
and James, M. R.: Quantifying ice cliff evolution with multi-temporal point
clouds on the debris-covered Khumbu Glacier, Nepal, J. Glaciol., 63,
823–837, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.47" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.47</a>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib165"><label>165</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, C. S., King, O., Miles, E. S., and Quincey, D. J.: Optimising NDWI
supraglacial pond classification on Himalayan debris-covered glaciers, Remote Sens. Environ., 217, 414–425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.020</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib166"><label>166</label><mixed-citation>
Wehn, S., Lundemo, S., and Holten, J. I.: Alpine vegetation along multiple
environmental gradients and possible consequences of climate change, Alp.
Bot., 124, 155–164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-014-0136-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-014-0136-9</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib167"><label>167</label><mixed-citation>
Wessels, R. L., Kargel, J. S., and Kieffer, H. H.: ASTER measurement of
supraglacial lakes in the Mount Everest region of the Himalaya, Ann. Glaciol.,
34, 399–408, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib168"><label>168</label><mixed-citation>
Westoby, M. J., Glasser, N. F., Brasington, J., Hambrey, M. J., Quincey, D.
J., and Reynolds, J. M.: Modelling outburst floods from moraine-dammed
glacial lakes, Earth-Sci. Rev., 134, 137–159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.009</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib169"><label>169</label><mixed-citation>
Westoby, M. J., Rounce, D. R., Shaw, T. E., Fyffe, C. L., Moore, P. L.,
Stewart, R. L., and Brock, B. W.: Geomorphological evolution of a
debris-covered glacier surface, Earth Surf. Proc. Landf., 45,
3431–3448, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4973" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4973</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib170"><label>170</label><mixed-citation>
Wulder, M. A., Loveland, T. R., Roy, D. P., Crawford, C. J., Masek, J. G.,
Woodcock, C. E., Allen, R. G., Anderson, M. C., Belward, A. S., Cohen, W.
B., Dwyer, J., Erb, A., Gao, F., Griffiths, P., Helder, D., Hermosilla, T.,
Hipple, J. D., Hostert, P., Hughes, M. J., Huntington, J., Johnson, D. M.,
Kennedy, R., Kilic, A., Li, Z., Lymburner, L., McCorkel, J., Pahlevan, N.,
Scambos, T. A., Schaaf, C., Schott, J. R., Sheng, Y., Storey, J., Vermote,
E., Vogelmann, J., White, J. C., Wynne, R. H., and Zhu, Z.: Current status
of Landsat program, science, and applications, Remote Sens. Environ., 225,
127–147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.015</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib171"><label>171</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, F., Liu, S., Wu, K., Zhu, Y., Gao, Y., Qi, M., Duan, S., Saifullah, M.,
and Tahir, A. A.: Upward Expansion of Supra-Glacial Debris Cover in the
Hunza Valley, Karakoram, during 1990–2019, Front. Earth
Sci., 8, 308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00308" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00308</a>, 2020.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib172"><label>172</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, Y., Sha, Z., and Yu, M.: Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping:
a review, J. Plant Ecol., 1, 9–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtm005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtm005</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib173"><label>173</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, B., Liu, G., Zhang, R., Fu, Y., Liu, Q., Cai, J., Wang, X., and Li,
Z.: Monitoring Dynamic Evolution of the Glacial Lakes by Using Time Series
of Sentinel-1A SAR Images, Remote Sens., 13, 10.3390/rs13071313, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib174"><label>174</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Suhong, L., Qizhong, L., and Jiacheng, S.: Sub-pixel lake mapping
in Tibetan Plateau, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 0-7803-8742-2/04, 3073–3076, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib175"><label>175</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Z., Wang, S., and Woodcock, C. E.: Improvement and expansion of the
Fmask algorithm: cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection for Landsats 4–7,
8, and Sentinel 2 images, Remote Sens. Environ., 159, 269–277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.12.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.12.014</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
