<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-14-4675-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Spring melt pond fraction in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago predicted from
RADARSAT-2</article-title><alt-title>Spring melt pond fraction in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Spring melt pond fraction in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~E.~L. Howell et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Howell</surname><given-names>Stephen E. L.</given-names></name>
          <email>stephen.howell@canada.ca</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4848-9867</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Scharien</surname><given-names>Randall K.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2761-4809</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Landy</surname><given-names>Jack</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-1007</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Brady</surname><given-names>Mike</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-0951</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada,
Toronto, M3H 5T4, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, V8W 2Y2,
Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8
1QU, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Stephen E. L. Howell (stephen.howell@canada.ca)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>4675</fpage><lpage>4686</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e121">Melt ponds form on the surface of Arctic sea ice during
spring, influencing how much solar radiation is absorbed into the sea
ice–ocean system, which in turn impacts the ablation of sea ice during the
melt season. Accordingly, melt pond fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has been shown to be a
useful predictor of sea ice area during the summer months. Sea ice dynamic
and thermodynamic processes operating within the narrow channels and inlets
of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) during the summer months are
difficult for model simulations to accurately resolve. Additional
information on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability in advance of the melt season within the
CAA could help constrain model simulations and/or provide useful information
in advance of the shipping season. Here, we use RADARSAT-2 imagery to
predict and analyze peak melt pond fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and evaluate its
utility to provide predictive information with respect to sea ice area
during the melt season within the CAA from 2009–2018. The temporal
variability of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the 10-year record was found to be
strongly linked to the variability of mean April multi-year ice area with a
statistically significant detrended correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.89. The
spatial distribution of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found to be in excellent
agreement with the sea ice stage of development prior to the melt
season. RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were in good agreement with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed from in situ observations but were found to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 larger compared to MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations. Dynamically stable sea
ice regions within the CAA exhibited higher detrended correlations between
RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and summer sea ice area. Our results show that RADARSAT-2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be used to provide predictive information about summer sea ice
area for a key shipping region of the Northwest Passage.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e271">Arctic sea ice extent during the summer months has declined considerably
over the satellite record (Serreze et al., 2007; Stroeve et al., 2012; Peng
and Meier, 2017). Surface melt ponds, which form on sea ice during the
spring, play an important role in the decay of sea ice and seasonal
reduction in ice extent because they influence how much solar radiation is
absorbed into the sea ice–ocean system (Eicken et al., 2004). Specifically,
the accumulation of meltwater on the surface of the sea ice lowers the
albedo from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 to between 0.2–0.4 and enhances melt
(Perovich et al., 2002). The topographical constraints over multi-year ice
(MYI) imposed by hummocks typically result in MYI exhibiting a lower melt
pond fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to seasonal first-year ice (FYI) (Grenfell
and Perovich, 2004; Polashenski et al., 2012; Landy et al., 2015). With
Arctic sea ice transitioning from a MYI- to FYI-dominated icescape (Maslanik
et el., 2011), the lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of MYI will gradually be replaced with the
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of FYI, facilitating even more sea ice energy absorption and
further enhancing sea ice melt (Perovich and Polashenski, 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e314">Predicting the state of Arctic sea ice several months in advance is
challenging, and recently the sea ice prediction community has focused
efforts on the development and utilization of dynamical forecast models
(e.g. Chevallier et al., 2013; Sigmond et al., 2013; Guemas et al., 2016).
Despite these recent efforts, rapidly changing Arctic sea ice<?pagebreak page4676?> conditions
will continue to necessitate improved sea ice forecasting capabilities
(Eicken, 2013). Accordingly, prognostic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> schemes have been integrated
in climate models and have shown to exert a strong influence on summer sea
ice area and extent (Flocco et al., 2010, 2012). Schröder
et al. (2014) found a strong correlation between model-simulated May
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the observed September sea ice extent. Observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has also
demonstrated significant predictive skill for September ice extent from
late July onwards (Liu et al.,  2015). However, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates for the
entire Arctic can be provided by model simulations, more representative and
higher spatial resolution observational estimates at regional and pan-Arctic
scales are much more difficult to obtain.</p>
      <p id="d1e361">Optical remote sensing is the most widely utilized approach to estimate
large-scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from space (e.g. Markus et al., 2003; Tschudi et al.,
2008; Rösel et al., 2012; Istomina et al., 2015; Webster et al., 2015;
Lee et al., 2020) but cloud cover remains a significant problem. Techniques
for retrieving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using advanced quad-polarization and
compact-polarization mode synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery, at C- and
X-band frequencies, have also been developed (Scharien et al., 2014; Fors et
al., 2017; Li et al., 2017), but they are limited in systematic spatial
application because the required polarization modes are not always available
from wide-swath imagery. However, using the winter backscatter from widely
available Sentinel-1 SAR imagery, Scharien et al. (2017) recently
demonstrated a technique for predicting spring peak melt pond fraction
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the entire Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) 3–4 months in
advance of melt pond formation. These <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> predictions have potential
utility in seasonal summer sea ice area and extent forecasts as early as
April.</p>
      <p id="d1e408">The CAA is a collection of islands located in northern Canada (Fig. 1)
whose waterways are sea ice covered between fall and spring. It is an active
region for marine shipping and has recently experienced an increase in
summer shipping activity (Pizzolato et al., 2014). Model simulations have
been utilized to understand the current and predicted future variability of
sea ice conditions in the CAA (e.g. Dumas et al., 2006; Sou and Flato, 2009,
Howell et al., 2016; Laliberté et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2018;
Laliberté et al., 2018). However, modelling the CAA still remains
challenging because complex sea ice dynamic and thermodynamic processes are
often not accurately resolved in its narrow channels and inlets. In
addition, the response of the CAA to climatic change is perhaps
counter-intuitive as longer melt seasons are resulting in increased MYI
import from the Arctic Ocean during the summer months (Howell and Brady,
2019). Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is linked to summer sea ice melt processes (e.g. Eicken
et al., 2004; Skyllingstad and Polashenski, 2018) additional information on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability within the CAA could improve our understanding of
regional summer melt processes, help constrain model simulations, and
facilitate safer shipping activity in upcoming years.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e436">Map of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago region (red
shading). The green star indicates the location of the lidar and aerial
photograph observations.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e445">In this study, we extend the work of Scharien et al. (2017) and investigate
predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability within the CAA over the longer-term record
available from RADARSAT-2. Specifically, (i) we estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the CAA
using RADARSAT-2; (ii) evaluate the spatiotemporal variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the CAA from 2009–2018; (iii) compare RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values to Sentinel-1
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from Scharien et al. (2017), in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations from Landy
et al. (2014) and Moderate Resolution Image Spectroradiometer (MODIS)
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from Rösel et al. (2012); and (iv) investigate the utility
of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to provide predictive information about sea ice area
in the CAA during the summer melt season.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Data</title>
      <p id="d1e552">The primary dataset used in this analysis was 5.405 GHz (wavelength,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.5 cm; C-band) SAR imagery in ScanSAR wide mode at HH
polarization from RADARSAT-2 acquired over the CAA (Fig. 1) in April from
2009–2018 (Table 1). RADARSAT-2 ScanSAR wide mode imagery has a spatial
resolution of 100 m with an incidence angle range of 20.0 to
49.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. We limited our analysis to only RADARSAT-2 images at HH
polarization because Scharien et al. (2017) found HV produced noisy results
in addition to there not being<?pagebreak page4677?> sufficient imagery at HV polarization in the
early period of the RADARSAT-2 record to cover CAA in April.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e579">Number of RADARSAT-2 images acquired over the Canadian
Arctic Archipelago in April for 2009–2018.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Year</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RADARSAT-2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">image count</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">138</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">149</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">149</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">188</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">159</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">133</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">159</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">151</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">144</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e705">In situ observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on landfast FYI were obtained in 2 consecutive
years from sites in the CAA using a terrestrial light detection and ranging
(lidar) system (Landy et al., 2014) (Fig. 1, green star). In 2011, the
site was located in Allen Bay on FYI with relatively rough surface
topography, whereas in 2012, the site was located in Resolute Passage on FYI
with relatively smooth topography. At each site, time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
observations were collected within the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m area of the ice over
a 2- to 3-week period following melt onset, covering three of the four stages
of melt pond evolution detailed in Eicken et al. (2002). The lidar system
produces dense measurements over snow or sea ice, with specular reflection
over melt ponds allowing melt pond fractions to be retrieved with an
accuracy better than 5 % (Landy et al., 2014). These observations allow us
to evaluate how well RADARSAT-2 resolves <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of seasonally evolving sea
ice coverage.</p>
      <p id="d1e754">Aerial photographs of estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> directly over the lidar site and the
adjacent sea ice area away from land and open water were also obtained on
22 June 2012. The aerial photographs have a 0.22 m pixel resolution, covering 750 m by 750 m. In total, 123 aerial photographs of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were used, and a complete description of the dataset is provided in
Scharien et al. (2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e779">Finally, we made use of 8 d composite satellite observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
obtained from the MODIS Arctic melt pond cover fraction dataset that has a
spatial resolution of 12.5 km for the period of 2009–2011 (Rösel et al.,
2012) and weekly sea ice area and stage of development observations obtained
from the Canadian Ice Service Digital Archive (CISDA) regional ice charts
for the period of 2009–2018 (Tivy et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Estimating $f_{\mathrm{pk}}$ from RADARSAT-2}?><title>Estimating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from RADARSAT-2</title>
      <p id="d1e813">RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined using a modified approach to that
described by Scharien et al. (2017). Their approach determines the second
stage of the seasonal melt pond evolution cycle when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is at its peak
(Eicken et al., 2002; Polashenski et al., 2012) using Sentinel-1 Extra Wide
(EW) swath imagery obtained during April  within the CAA. April
corresponds to late winter sea ice conditions in the CAA, when sea ice
growth has reached its maximum and spring warming has yet to begin. Their
approach was developed by relating the winter period HH gamma nought
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) backscatter in decibels (dB) from Sentinel-1 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations in 1.7 m spatial resolution GeoEye-1 imagery, from
spatially coincident image segments that represented homogeneous FYI and MYI
regions. The result was that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> can be converted to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M53" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.221</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.041</mml:mn><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In Eq. (1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was found to explain 73 % of the
variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Scharien et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e945">In this study, all the available HH polarization RADARSAT-2 imagery over the
CAA in April from 2009–2018 (Table 1) was first calibrated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which minimizes the influence of incidence angle more so than
with sigma nought (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Small, 2011). RADARSAT-2 images
were then speckle filtered using a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Lee filter and spatially registered
to a common map projection. Finally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was converted to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by applying Eq. (1) to each RADARSAT-2 image. For each year,
the corresponding RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> images in April were mosaicked together
to cover the entire spatial domain of the CAA. Constructing a mosaic over a
large region such as the CAA presents certain challenges with SAR imagery,
particularly incidence angle variability. Even with the use of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Scharien et al. (2017) found that because of varying incidence
angles associated with different ScanSAR images that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> striping can
still occur within the CAA in the mosaicked image. Our approach here was to
average out incidence angle variability by taking advantage of a large amount
of overlapping RADARSAT-2 imagery within the CAA (i.e. 90 to 159 images;
Table 1) together with the fact that the majority of the sea ice in the CAA
is landfast (immobile) during April, which results in a temporally stable
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all April images. To produce a RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mosaic
within the CAA for each year, we calculated the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each
overlapping pixel using all of each year's RADARSAT-2 April images that
effectively helped to reduce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> striping across the CAA.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4678?><p id="d1e1090">The root-mean-square error (RMSE) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on Eq. (1) is 0.085
(Scharien et al., 2017). While calculating the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
overlapping image pixels helps reduce striping across the CAA, it also adds
additional uncertainty and its effectiveness depends on the number of
overlaps. In order to quantify the additional uncertainty (RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), we
used the mean and maximum standard deviation of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of all
pixels within the CAA calculated from 2009–2018 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">std</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) together with a
range of pixel overlaps (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RMSE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">std</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.085</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Since RADARSAT-2 imagery is acquired operationally, overlapping images vary
interannually but pixel overlaps across the CAA were typically between 6–12.
Figure 2 illustrates the RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for a range of pixel overlaps
using the 2009–2018 mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">std</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.08 and the 2009–2018 maximum
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">std</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.2. For the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">std</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with pixel overlaps between
6–12 the RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 0.10–0.12.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1270">The root-mean-square error of RADARSAT-2 peak melt pond
fraction values (RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) with increasing number of RADARSAT-2 pixel
overlaps. The vertical dashed lines indicate the range of typical overlap
from 2009–2018.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{RADARSAT-2 $f_{\mathrm{pk}}$ spatial and temporal variability
from 2009--2018}?><title>RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial and temporal variability
from 2009–2018</title>
      <p id="d1e1319">The spatial distribution of mosaicked RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and pre-melt season
(i.e. April) and sea ice stage of developed conditions in the CAA for the
2009–2018 time period are shown in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively. Lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are located primarily in the northern regions of the CAA
(Queen Elizabeth Islands), Viscount Melville Sound, and the M'Clintock
Channel where the majority of the CAA's MYI is typically found. The shallow
bays and narrow channels located throughout the CAA exhibit high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values and these regions are typically associated with smooth FYI whereas
rougher ice regions (i.e. Gulf of Boothia) are associated with lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. We should expect a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over MYI regions compared
to FYI regions (Grenfell and Perovich, 2004; Perovich and Polashenski, 2012),
and indeed the overall spatial distribution of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is in
excellent agreement with the spatial distribution of sea ice stage of
development prior to the melt season for all years.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1391">Spatial distribution of RADARSAT-2 peak melt pond
fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago from 2009–2018 <bold>(a–j)</bold>.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1417">Spatial distribution of sea ice stage of development
(type) in the first week of April in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago for
2009–2018 <bold>(a–j)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1431">Boxplot time series of RADARSAT-2 peak melt pond fraction
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and mean April multi-year ice (MYI) area in the Canadian Arctic
Archipelago for 2009–2018. The solid blue line represents the mean <bold>(a)</bold>.
Spatial distribution of the RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation from
2009–2018 <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1468">Figure 5a shows the time series of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability together
with mean April MYI area in the CAA from 2009–2018. Over the 10-year record,
the mean RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.47 and ranged from a low of 0.43 in 2009
to a high of 0.52 in 2013. The temporal variability in RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
reflected in the variability of April MYI area within the CAA over the
10-year record with a statistically significant detrended correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.89. The RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> linkage with April MYI area is
particularly evident from 2011 and 2012 which were very light sea ice years
within the CAA whereby a considerable amount of the CAA's MYI area was lost
during the summer melt season (Howell et al., 2013), and this resulted in
2012 and 2013 (i.e. the years following extreme melt) being the two highest
RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years from 2009–2018 (Fig. 3d–e). MYI area within in
the CAA then increased following these light ice years and RADARSAT
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> began to respond accordingly. In fact, there has always been a
period of MYI recovery following light ice years with either MYI grown in situ
and/or advected from Arctic Ocean into the CAA and gradually migrating to
the CAA's southern regions (Howell et al., 2013). Figure 5b illustrates the
standard deviation of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2009–2018 and spatially
reflects the process of MYI flowing southward through the CAA as RADARSAT-2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was more variable in the MYI regions of the CAA compared to regions
where FYI dominates the regional icescape.</p>
      <p id="d1e1581">What is interesting in Fig. 5a is that the mean RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2009
was lower than all years from 2014–2018 (with the exception of 2016) despite
the CAA containing less MYI area. In addition, 2017 and 2018 exhibited a
larger spatial coverage of MYI compared to 2009 (Fig. 4a, i–j). We
suggest that higher RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in recent years is a result of Arctic
Ocean MYI entering the CAA being younger and thinner than in 2009 (Howell
and Brady, 2019) with smoother surface topography, thereby having a higher
summer melt pond coverage (Landy et al., 2015). This seems to be
particularly evident in the Viscount Melville Sound and
M'Clintock Channels regions when comparing 2009 (Fig. 3a) with 2017
(Fig. 3i) and 2018 (Fig. 3j). Indeed, several studies have reported
considerable decreases in the age and thickness of Arctic Ocean MYI north of
the CAA in recent years (e.g. Kwok, 2018; Petty et al., 2020; Tschudi et
al., 2020)</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Comparison of RADARSAT-2
$f_{{\mathrm{pk}}}$ with Sentinel-1,
in situ, and MODIS }?><title>Comparison of RADARSAT-2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with Sentinel-1,
in situ, and MODIS </title>
      <p id="d1e1626">Frequency distributions of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Sentinel-1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
Scharien et al. (2017) in the CAA for 2016 and 2017 are shown in Fig. 6.
Sentinel-1 appears to estimate more regions of lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to
RADARSAT-2 which are typically associated with MYI. Whereas RADARSAT-2
estimates more regions of higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which are typically associated with
smooth FYI. We consider these subtle differences to be primarily the result
of taking the mean of all<?pagebreak page4679?> available April RADARSAT-2 imagery (Table 1) over
all incidence angles in the CAA compared to only using images from
Sentinel-1 within the CAA constrained to a certain incident angle range. As
shown in Fig. 2, the uncertainty in RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies depending on
the number of pixel overlaps (images). Overall, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions
are in good agreement between both sensors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1698">Frequency distribution (%) of RADARSAT-2 peak melt
pond fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Sentinel-1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from Scharien et al. (2017)
in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago for 2016 and 2017.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1729">The in situ evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over FYI within the CAA acquired by Landy et al. (2014)  allows us to place the RADARSAT-2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates within the melt pond stages of development classification
system. Unfortunately, no MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations are located in close
proximity to the in situ observations. The evolution of melt ponds on the surface
of the sea ice has been classified into four distinct and<?pagebreak page4680?> consecutive
stages. A brief description is provided here, and the reader is referred to
Eicken et al. (2002) and Polashenski et al. (2012) for a more comprehensive
description. In stage I, meltwater from snowmelt fills topographic
depressions on the surface of the sea ice until the ponds reach their
maximum areal extent. In stage II, melt pond coverage decreases due to
horizontal water transport into macroscopic flaws and drainage through the
ice. In stage III, the melt ponds typically drain through to the ocean and
further changes in melt pond coverage depend on changes in surface
topography and freeboard. Finally, in stage IV, melt ponds that survived the
melt season refreeze and snow begins to accumulate on their surface.</p>
      <p id="d1e1766">Figure 7a compares the time series of the entire 100 m lidar melt pond
fraction coincident with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined from RADARSAT-2 at the
coinciding pixels. For 2011, RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the end of
stage I and beginning of stage II, thus providing a very good representation
of the seasonal peak of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, when the melt pond control on heat
uptake and ice decay, through the ice–albedo feedback, is greatest. For
2012, RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also corresponds to the end of stage I and
beginning of stage II but is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 lower than in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.
This is likely due to the short duration but very high maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
0.78 in 2012 as Scharien et al. (2017) found that Eq. (1) sometimes
underestimates very high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal
associated with very smooth FYI.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1868"><bold>(a)</bold> Temporal evolution of observed melt pond fraction
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and RADARSAT-2 peak melt pond fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at in situ observation
sites for 2011 (74.7229<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 95.1763<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) and 2012
(74.7264<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 95.5772<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W). <bold>(b)</bold> Frequency distribution of
RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerial photograph <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations in Resolute
Passage on 22 June 2012; the pink vertical link represents the mean lidar  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
on 22 June 2012.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1974">To give spatial context beyond the single-point comparison at the lidar
site, Fig. 7b shows the distribution of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined from aerial photo<?pagebreak page4681?> observations on 22 June 2012
near Resolute. The aerial photographs were acquired within 1 week of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coverage being observed at the lidar site. The comparison was done
by averaging all RADARSAT-2 pixels within each aerial photo (123 photos)
which represents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 861 samples. The mean aerial photograph
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.54 and RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.53 with an the RMSE of 0.10 and
bias of 0. The distributions are in reasonably good agreement but RADARSAT-2
values are slightly narrower than the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the aerial
photographs. It is likely the RADARSAT-2 distribution is narrow on the left
tail because our method captures peak pond coverage, and some of the regions
photographed were before or after their seasonal peak. We attribute the
narrow right tail to the documented underestimation of Eq. (1) from
Scharien et al. (2017). However, it is notable that both RADARSAT-2 and the
aerial photograph datasets capture the same bimodal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution,
with the first mode around 0.4–0.5 characterizing rougher sea ice areas and
the second mode around 0.7 capturing smooth flooded sea ice.</p>
      <p id="d1e2062">The seasonal time series of the 8 d composite MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the maximum
seasonal MODIS  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the predicted RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2009–2011 is
shown in Fig. 8. MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations within the CAA indicate initial
pond formation occurred in May for all years with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached in
mid-July for 2009 and in early June for 2010 and 2011. Compared to the
RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, the peak MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20
smaller. RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is higher on average than MODIS because the
MODIS 8 d product does not represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
observations are determined weekly using 8 d composite image products that
would include some melt pond formation and drainage processes prior to, and
after, the seasonal peak. Moreover, MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are essentially
aggregated from 500 m clear-sky pixels within a 12.5 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.5 km grid cell
(Rösel et al., 2012) and the 500 m spatial resolution may limit
detection of smaller pond fractions. Furthermore, not all of the 500 m pixels
within the 12.5 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.5 km grid cell are likely to be at the same melt
pond stage evolution. Finally, MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations give the time
series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; therefore even the highest seasonal estimated MODIS
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced because while some regions of the CAA are at their
seasonal peak others are behind or ahead. To that end, we also
calculated the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from MODIS regardless of timing during the
melt season, for each pixel, also shown in Fig. 8. These values more
closely compare with the RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but are still <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 smaller on average. Even the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from MODIS is from an 8 d
running mean of daily pond fraction estimates, so will underestimate the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if the duration of peak ponding is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 d. However, the
top whisker of the box plot of the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from MODIS indicates that
MODIS does capture some regions at peak during the 8 d time series.
Although we are using MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product to compare against our RADARSAT-2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates, Rösel et al. (2012) found that the MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
product also has errors up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1. Overall, MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
estimates are more representative of the seasonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rather than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the CAA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2389">Boxplots of the seasonal time series of MODIS melt pond
fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the maximum seasonal MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RADARSAT-2 peak
melt pond fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for <bold>(a)</bold> 2009, <bold>(b)</bold> 2010 and <bold>(c)</bold> 2011. The solid
blue line represents the mean.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Influence of RADARSAT-2
$f_{{\mathrm{pk}}}$ on summer sea ice area}?><title>Influence of RADARSAT-2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on summer sea ice area</title>
      <p id="d1e2461">In order to investigate whether RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values can be used to
provide predictive information for summer sea ice area within the CAA, we
separated the CAA into numerous predefined subregions and then determined
the detrended correlations between RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and weekly
sea ice area from the CISDA regional ice charts in each region over the
period of 2009–2018. We tested each week from the start of June to the end
of September. The strongest correlation, together with the corresponding
week of occurrence are shown in Fig. 9a and b, respectively. All the
strongest correlations are negative, indicating – as expected – that years
with higher predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are associated with lower sea
ice area at a later point in the summer. The higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the lower the
area-averaged albedo of the ice surface leading to accelerated melt and
lower sea ice concentrations (e.g. Perovich and Polashenski, 2012). There is
considerable spatial variability in the strongest correlation across the CAA
with relatively low correlations in the majority of the northern CAA and
very low correlations in the eastern regions of the CAA. The regions of
Kellet-Crozier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.92), Viscount Melville Sound (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.73), M'Clintock
Channel (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.77), and Norwegian Bay (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.78) all exhibit statistically
significant correlations above the 95 % confidence level. In terms of
timing for the statistically significant regions, RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
correlated the strongest to weekly sea ice area in August for all regions
except Norwegian Bay (Fig. 9b). Compared to previous studies, the primary
difference between using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values to predict summer sea ice conditions
seems to be the timing of when the correlation is the strongest. Using
simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, Schröder et al. (2014) found the strongest
correlation to September sea ice occurred for the May <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Liu et al. (2015) used observed MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and reported the strongest
correlation to September sea ice in late July. Our findings suggest that
methods such as these may be able to predict August sea ice area from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations or observations with higher confidence than September
ice area, at least in the CAA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2626">Spatial distribution of the <bold>(a)</bold> strongest detrended
correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) between RADARSAT-2 peak melt pond fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
weekly sea ice area and <bold>(b)</bold> week of occurrence.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page4682?><p id="d1e2659">Why is the relationship stronger in some regions of the CAA and weaker in
others? RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are determined from imagery
acquired in April when ice conditions in the CAA are landfast (immobile) and
do not evolve in concert with sea ice dynamics operating within the CAA. As
a result, RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values will not be spatially
representative of the region's ice conditions when region-specific dynamic
breakup processes dominate over thermodynamics (i.e. in situ melt). In other words,
the origin of the ice in these regions during the summer melt season will
not always be the same as in April (i.e. pre-melt) when the initial
RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value was determined. The time series of weekly detrended
RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and weekly sea ice area for selected regions within the
CAA is shown in Fig. 10 and provides evidence for this regional dichotomy.
In the Viscount Melville Sound and M'Clintock regions the correlations
gradually get stronger, reaching a peak in August. These regions are known
to be immobile and stagnant (e.g. Melling, 2002) with the majority of
breakup taking place in September, which is when the relationship begins to
degrade. The Kellet-Crozier is another stagnant region, which supports that
in the absence of considerable ice dynamics the relationship between
RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sea ice area is strong throughout the melt season.
The time series in Penny Strait illustrates how the correlation gradually
increases but when the region's dynamic breakup begins in July, ice is
advected southward which degrades the correlation. This was also the case
for many other regions in the northern CAA (not shown) as the flushing of
sea ice southward from the northern CAA is a regular occurrence during the
melt season (Melling, 2002; Howell et al., 2006). The low correlations in
the southeastern regions of the CAA are also likely a function of ice
dynamics as these regions of the CAA are known to be considerably influenced
by currents and wind (Prinsenberg and Hamilton, 2005), and sea ice speed in
Lancaster Sound and Barrow Strait can reach 10 km d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Agnew et al.,
2008).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2733">Time series of detrended correlations between RADARSAT-2
peak melt pond fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and weekly sea ice area for selected
regions in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago from June to September. The
dashed black line is statistical significance at the 95 % confidence
level.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2753">The strong and statistically significant correlation in the
Viscount Melville Sound region is encouraging as it is a key shipping region
in the northern route of the Northwest Passage. To that end, we used linear
regression to predict mean August sea ice area within Viscount Melville
Sound with the detrended RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as a predictor. Figure 11
illustrates the results compared to observations (detrended) from the
CISDA ice charts for 2009–2018. There is reasonable agreement between the
predicted and observed sea ice area in the region with an RMSE of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.44. The largest discrepancies
occurred for 2013 and 2014 with the RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model prediction
resulting in too little sea ice area. Overall, within the Viscount Melville
Sound region of CAA there is a period for which a significant statistical
relationship exists between RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the summer ice area
before sea ice dynamics degrades the relationship.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e2831">Predicated sea ice area anomalies (detrended) using
RADARSAT-2 peak melt pond fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and observed sea ice area
anomalies (detrended) from the Canadian Ice Service Digital Archive (CISDA)
ice charts in the Viscount Melville Sound region of the Canadian Arctic
Archipelago, 2009–2018.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/4675/2020/tc-14-4675-2020-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <?pagebreak page4683?><p id="d1e2860">In this study we predicted and analyzed spring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using RADARSAT-2
within the CAA from 2009–2018. The spatial variability in RADARSAT-2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found to be excellent agreement with the spatial distribution of
sea ice stage of development prior to the melt season as high (low)
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were associated with FYI (MYI) types. The temporal
variability of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the 10-year record was significantly
correlated to April MYI area, highlighting the importance of MYI within the
CAA. RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found to be in good agreement with the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum extent observed in situ for 2011 but was slightly lower than 2012
when peak  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was very large (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7). Compared to peak MODIS
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were larger by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05. Based on our comparative analysis, RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is more
representative of peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the CAA compared to the MODIS 8 d
product, which on average was found to underestimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 and is more representative of the seasonal mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We also found excellent agreement between RADARSAT-2 and Sentinel-1,
which suggests that combining both Sentinel-1 and the recently launched
RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM) could facilitate pan-Arctic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
estimates. The RCM will also facilitate continued investigation of
additional metrics that when combined with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> could
further improve predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3067">The results presented in this study indicate that dynamically stable sea ice
regions within the CAA exhibit a higher detrended correlation between
RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and summer sea ice area. Specifically, the strong and
statistically significant de-trended correlation in the Viscount Melville
Sound region demonstrates that RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates are useful for
providing predictive information about summer sea ice area in the northern
route of the Northwest Passage. This information could find utility in
constraining regional model simulations (e.g. Lemieux et al., 2016).
Alternatively, it could be advantageous to exploit the high spatial
resolution of SAR and investigate whether local-scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates could
enhanced knowledge of summer ice conditions in northern communities (e.g.
Cooley et al., 2020). Ultimately, imagery from RCM will ensure our time
series of RADARSAT-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates in the CAA will continue, gradually
building statistics and facilitating the development of more robust statistical
relationships in upcoming years.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <?pagebreak page4684?><p id="d1e3119">RADARSAT-2 imagery is available online for a fee from the Earth Observation
Data Management System (<uri>https://www.eodms-sgdot.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca</uri>, last access: 16 December 2020; Government of Canada, 2020a). RADARSAT-2-derived melt pond
fraction is available through the lead author Stephen E. L. Howell (stephen.howell@canada.ca). The MODIS Arctic melt pond cover fraction dataset is
available from the Integrated Climate Data Center (ICDC, <uri>https://icdc.cen.uni-hamburg.de/</uri>, last access: 16 December 2020; Universität Hamburg, 2020). The CISDA is available online from the
Canadian Ice Service (CIS; <uri>https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/ice-forecasts-observations/latest-conditions/archive-overview.html</uri>, last access: 16 December 2020; Government of Canada, 2020b).
In situ melt pond data are available through contributing author Jack Landy
(jack.landy@bristol.ac.uk), and the melt pond aerial photograph
data are available through contributing author Randall K. Scharien (randy@uvic.ca).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3134">SELH wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. SELH, RKS, and MB preformed the analysis.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3140">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3146">Funding for RKS provided by Polar Knowledge Canada Science and Technology
program (grant no. NST-1718-0024) and Marine Environmental Observation Prediction
and Response Network (MEOPAR) (project no. 1-02-02-012.5). Jack Landy is supported by the
European Space Agency Living Planet Fellowship “Arctic-SummIT” (grant no.
ESA/4000125582/18/I-NS) and the Natural Environment Research Council (grant nos. “PRE-MELT” NE/T000546/1 and “Diatom-ARCTIC” NE/R012849/1).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3152">This paper was edited by Ludovic Brucker and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Agnew, T., Lambe, A., and Long, D.: Estimating sea ice area flux across the
Canadian Arctic Archipelago using enhanced AMSR-E, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C10011,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004582" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JC004582</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chevallier, M., Salas, D., Mélia, Y., Voldoire, A., Déqué, M.,
and Garric, G.: Seasonal forecasts of the pan-Arctic sea ice extent using a
GCM-based seasonal prediction system, J. Climate, 26, 6092–6104,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00612.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00612.1</ext-link>, 2013</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cooley, S. W., Ryan, J. C., Smith, L. C., Horvat, C., Pearson, B., Dale, B., and Lynch, A. H.: Coldest Canadian Arctic
communities face greatest reductions in shorefast sea ice, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 533–538,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0757-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-020-0757-5</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dumas, J. A., Flato, G. M., and Brown, R. D.: Future projections of landfast
ice thickness and duration in the Canadian Arctic, J. Climate, 19, 5175–5189, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eicken, H.: Ocean science: Arctic sea ice needs better forecasts, Nature,
497, 431–433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/497431a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/497431a</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eicken, H., Krouse, H. R., Kadko, D., and Perovich, D. K.: Tracer studies of
pathways and rates of meltwater transport through Arctic summer sea ice,
J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JC000583</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eicken, H., Grenfell, T. C., Perovich, D. K., Richter-Menge, J. A., and Frey,
K.: Hydraulic controls of summer Arctic pack ice albedo, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C08007,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001989" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JC001989</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Flocco, D., Feltham, D. L., and Turner, A. K.: Incorporation of a physically
based melt pond scheme into the sea ice component of a climate model,
J. Geophys. Res., 115, C08012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005568" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JC005568</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Flocco, D., Schröder, D., Feltham, D. L., and Hunke, E. C.: Impact of melt
ponds on Arctic sea ice simulations from 1990 to 2007, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C09032,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008195" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JC008195</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fors, A. S., Divine, D. V., Doulgeris, A. P., Renner, A. H. H., and Gerland, S.: Signature of Arctic first-year ice melt pond fraction in X-band SAR imagery, The Cryosphere, 11, 755–771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-755-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-11-755-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grenfell, T. C. and Perovich, D. K.: Seasonal and spatial evolution of
albedo in a snow-ice-land-ocean environment, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C01001,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001866" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JC001866</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Government of Canada: Canadian Ice Service archive: overview, available at: <uri>https://www.eodms-sgdot.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca</uri>, last access: 16 December 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Government of Canada: Earth Observation
Data Management System, available at: <uri>https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/ice-forecasts-observations/latest-conditions/archive-overview.html</uri>, last access: 16 December 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guemas, V., Chevallier, M., Déqué, M., Bellprat, O., and Doblas-Reyes,
F.: Impact of sea ice initialization on sea ice and atmosphere prediction
skill on seasonal timescales, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3889–3896, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066626" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL066626</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Howell, S. E. L.  and Brady, M.: The dynamic response of sea ice to warming
in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 13119–13125,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL085116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Howell, S. E. L., Tivy, A., Yackel, J. J., and Scharien, R. K.: Application of a
SeaWinds/QuikSCAT sea ice melt algorithm for assessing melt dynamics in the
Canadian Arctic Archipelago, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 111, C07025, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JC003193</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Howell, S. E. L., Wohlleben, T., Komarov, A., Pizzolato, L., and Derksen, C.: Recent extreme light sea ice years in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: 2011 and 2012 eclipse 1998 and 2007, The Cryosphere, 7, 1753–1768, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1753-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-1753-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Howell, S. E. L., Laliberté, F., Kwok, R., Derksen, C., and King, J.: Landfast ice thickness in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago from observations and models, The Cryosphere, 10, 1463–1475, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1463-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-10-1463-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4685?><ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, X., Sun, J., Chan, T. O., and Myers, P. G.: Thermodynamic and dynamic ice thickness contributions in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago in NEMO-LIM2 numerical simulations, The Cryosphere, 12, 1233–1247, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1233-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-12-1233-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Istomina, L., Heygster, G., Huntemann, M., Schwarz, P., Birnbaum, G., Scharien, R., Polashenski, C., Perovich, D., Zege, E., Malinka, A., Prikhach, A., and Katsev, I.: Melt pond fraction and spectral sea ice albedo retrieval from MERIS data – Part 1: Validation against in situ, aerial, and ship cruise data, The Cryosphere, 9, 1551–1566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1551-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-1551-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kwok, R.: Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage:
losses and coupled variability (1958–2018),  Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 105005,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae3ec" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aae3ec</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laliberté, F., Howell, S. E. L., and Kushner, P. J.: Regional variability of
a projected sea ice-free Arctic during the summer months, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 256–263,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066855" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL066855</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laliberté, F., Howell, S. E. L., Lemieux, J.-F., Dupont, F., and Lei, J.: What historical landfast ice observations tell us about projected ice conditions in Arctic archipelagoes and marginal seas under anthropogenic forcing, The Cryosphere, 12, 3577–3588, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3577-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-12-3577-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Landy, J. C., Ehn, J. K., Shields, M., and Barber, D. G.: Surface and melt pond
evolution on landfast first-year sea ice in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago,
J. Geophys. Res., 119, 3054–3075, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Landy, J. C., Ehn, J. K., and Barber, D. G.: Albedo feedback enhanced by
smoother Arctic sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 710–714, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL066712</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, S., Stroeve, J. C., Tsamados, M., and Khand, A.L.: Machine learning
approaches to retrieve pan-Arctic melt ponds from visible satellite imagery,
Remote Sens. Environ., 247, 111919, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111919" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2020.111919</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lemieux, J.-F., Beaudoin, C., Dupont, F., Roy, F., Smith, G.C., Shlyaeva,
A., Buehner, M., Caya, A., Chen, J., Carrieres, T., Pogson, L.,
DeRepentigny, P., Plante, A., Pestieau, P., Pellerin, P., Ritchie, H.,
Garric, G., and Ferry, N.: The Regional Ice Prediction System (RIPS):
verification of forecast sea ice concentration, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 142, 632–643,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2526" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2526</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, H., Perrie, W., Li, Q., and Hou, Y.: Estimation of melt pond fractions
on first year sea ice using compact polarization SAR, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 8145–8166,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JC013248</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Song, M. H., Horton R. M., and Hu, Y.: Revisiting the potential of
melt pond fraction as a predictor for the seasonal Arctic sea ice extent
minimum, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054017</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Markus, T., Cavalieri, D. J., Tschudi, M. A., and Ivanoff, A.: Comparison of
aerial video and Landsat 7 data over ponded sea ice, Remote Sens. Environ., 86, 458–469, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Maslanik, J., Stroeve, J., Fowler, C., and Emery, W.: Distribution and
trends in Arctic sea ice age through spring 2011, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L13502,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047735</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Melling, H.: Sea ice of the northern Canadian Arctic Archipelago, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 3181, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JC001102</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peng, G. and Meier, W. M.: Temporal and regional variability of Arctic
sea-ice coverage from satellite data, Ann. Glaciol., 59, 191–200,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2017.32" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2017.32</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Perovich, D. K.  and Polashenski., C.: Albedo evolution of seasonal Arctic
sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L08501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051432" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL051432</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Perovich, D. K., Grenfell, T. C., Light, B., and Hobbs, P. V.: Seasonal
evolution of the albedo of multiyear Arctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8044,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000438" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JC000438</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petty, A. A., Kurtz, N. T., Kwok, R., Markus, T., and Neumann, T. A.: Winter
Arctic sea ice thickness from ICESat-2 freeboards, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015764,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015764" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JC015764</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pizzolato, L., Howell, S. E. L., Derksen, C., Dawson, J., and Copland, L.:
Changing sea ice conditions and marine transportation activity in Canadian
Arctic waters between 1990 and 2012, Climatic Change, 123, 161–173,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1038-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-013-1038-3</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Polashenski, C., Perovich, D. K., and Courville, Z.: The mechanisms of sea
ice melt pond formation and evolution, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C01001,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007231" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JC007231</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prinsenberg, S. J. and Hamilton, J.: Monitoring the volume, freshwater and
heat fluxes passing through Lancaster sound in the Canadian Arctic
Archipelago, Atmos.-Ocean, 43, 1–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3137/ao.430101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3137/ao.430101</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rösel, A., Kaleschke, L., and Birnbaum, G.: Melt ponds on Arctic sea ice determined from MODIS satellite data using an artificial neural network, The Cryosphere, 6, 431–446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-431-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-6-431-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scharien, R. K., Hochheim, K., Landy, J., and Barber, D. G.: First-year sea ice melt pond fraction estimation from dual-polarisation C-band SAR – Part 2: Scaling in situ to Radarsat-2, The Cryosphere, 8, 2163–2176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2163-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-2163-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scharien, R. K., Segal, R., Nasonova, S., Nandan, V., Howell, S. E. L., and
Haas, C.: Winter Sentinel-1 backscatter as a predictor of spring Arctic sea
ice melt pond fraction, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 12262–12270,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL075547</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Serreze, M. C., Holland, M. M., and Stroeve, J.: Perspectives on the Arctic's
shrinking sea-ice cover, Science, 315, 1533–1536, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schröder, D., Feltham, D. L., Flocco, D., and Tsamados, M.: September
Arctic sea-ice minimum predicted by spring melt-pond fraction, Nat. Clim. Change, 4,
353–357, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2203</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sigmond, M., Fyfe, J. C., Flato, G. M., Kharin, V. V., and Merryfield, W. J.:
Seasonal forecast skill of Arctic sea ice area in a dynamical forecast
system, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 529–534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50129" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50129</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Skyllingstad, E. D. and Polashenski, C.: Estimated heat budget during
summer melt of Arctic first-year sea ice
Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11789–11797, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL080349</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Small, D.: Flattening gamma: Radiometric terrain correction for SAR imagery,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S., 49, 3081–3093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2120616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2011.2120616</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4686?><ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sou, T. and Flato, G.: Sea ice in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: Modeling
the past (1950–2004) and the future (2041–60), J. Climate, 22, 2181–2198, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stroeve, J. C., Serreze, M. C., Holland, M. M., Kay, J. E., Maslanik, J., and
Barrett, A. P.: The Arctic's rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: A research
synthesis, Climatic Change, 110, 1005–1027, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0101-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-011-0101-1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tivy, A., Howell, S. E. L., Alt, B., McCourt, S., Chagnon, R., Crocker, G.,
Carrieres, T., and Yackel, J. J.: Trends and variability in summer sea ice
cover in the Canadian Arctic based on the Canadian Ice Service Digital
Archive, 1960–2008 and 1968–2008, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C03007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005855" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JC005855</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tschudi, M. A., Maslanik, J. A., and Perovich, D. K.: Derivation of melt pond
coverage on arctic sea ice using MODIS observation, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 2605–2614, 2008.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tschudi, M. A., Meier, W. N., and Stewart, J. S.: An enhancement to sea ice motion and age products at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), The Cryosphere, 14, 1519–1536, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1519-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-14-1519-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Universität Hamburg: Integrated Climate Data Center – ICDC, available at: <uri>https://icdc.cen.uni-hamburg.de/</uri>, last access: 16 December 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Webster, M. A., Rigor, I. G., Perovich, D. K., Richter-Menge, J. A.,
Polashenski, C. M., and Light, B.: Seasonal evolution of melt ponds on Arctic
sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 5968–5982, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JC011030</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Spring melt pond fraction in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago predicted from RADARSAT-2</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Melt ponds form on the surface of Arctic sea ice during
spring, influencing how much solar radiation is absorbed into the sea
ice–ocean system, which in turn impacts the ablation of sea ice during the
melt season. Accordingly, melt pond fraction (<i>f</i><sub>p</sub>) has been shown to be a
useful predictor of sea ice area during the summer months. Sea ice dynamic
and thermodynamic processes operating within the narrow channels and inlets
of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) during the summer months are
difficult for model simulations to accurately resolve. Additional
information on <i>f</i><sub>p</sub> variability in advance of the melt season within the
CAA could help constrain model simulations and/or provide useful information
in advance of the shipping season. Here, we use RADARSAT-2 imagery to
predict and analyze peak melt pond fraction (<i>f</i><sub>pk</sub>) and evaluate its
utility to provide predictive information with respect to sea ice area
during the melt season within the CAA from 2009–2018. The temporal
variability of RADARSAT-2 <i>f</i><sub>pk</sub> over the 10-year record was found to be
strongly linked to the variability of mean April multi-year ice area with a
statistically significant detrended correlation (<i>R</i>) of <i>R</i> = −0.89. The
spatial distribution of RADARSAT-2 <i>f</i><sub>pk</sub> was found to be in excellent
agreement with the sea ice stage of development prior to the melt
season. RADARSAT-2 <i>f</i><sub>pk</sub> values were in good agreement with
<i>f</i><sub>pk</sub> observed from in situ observations but were found to be  ∼ &thinsp;0.05 larger compared to MODIS <i>f</i><sub>pk</sub> observations. Dynamically stable sea
ice regions within the CAA exhibited higher detrended correlations between
RADARSAT-2 <i>f</i><sub>pk</sub> and summer sea ice area. Our results show that RADARSAT-2
<i>f</i><sub>pk</sub> can be used to provide predictive information about summer sea ice
area for a key shipping region of the Northwest Passage.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agnew, T., Lambe, A., and Long, D.: Estimating sea ice area flux across the
Canadian Arctic Archipelago using enhanced AMSR-E, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C10011,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004582" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004582</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Chevallier, M., Salas, D., Mélia, Y., Voldoire, A., Déqué, M.,
and Garric, G.: Seasonal forecasts of the pan-Arctic sea ice extent using a
GCM-based seasonal prediction system, J. Climate, 26, 6092–6104,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00612.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00612.1</a>, 2013
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Cooley, S. W., Ryan, J. C., Smith, L. C., Horvat, C., Pearson, B., Dale, B., and Lynch, A. H.: Coldest Canadian Arctic
communities face greatest reductions in shorefast sea ice, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 533–538,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0757-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0757-5</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Dumas, J. A., Flato, G. M., and Brown, R. D.: Future projections of landfast
ice thickness and duration in the Canadian Arctic, J. Climate, 19, 5175–5189, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Eicken, H.: Ocean science: Arctic sea ice needs better forecasts, Nature,
497, 431–433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/497431a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/497431a</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Eicken, H., Krouse, H. R., Kadko, D., and Perovich, D. K.: Tracer studies of
pathways and rates of meltwater transport through Arctic summer sea ice,
J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000583" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000583</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Eicken, H., Grenfell, T. C., Perovich, D. K., Richter-Menge, J. A., and Frey,
K.: Hydraulic controls of summer Arctic pack ice albedo, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C08007,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001989" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001989</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Flocco, D., Feltham, D. L., and Turner, A. K.: Incorporation of a physically
based melt pond scheme into the sea ice component of a climate model,
J. Geophys. Res., 115, C08012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005568" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005568</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Flocco, D., Schröder, D., Feltham, D. L., and Hunke, E. C.: Impact of melt
ponds on Arctic sea ice simulations from 1990 to 2007, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C09032,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008195" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008195</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Fors, A. S., Divine, D. V., Doulgeris, A. P., Renner, A. H. H., and Gerland, S.: Signature of Arctic first-year ice melt pond fraction in X-band SAR imagery, The Cryosphere, 11, 755–771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-755-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-755-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Grenfell, T. C. and Perovich, D. K.: Seasonal and spatial evolution of
albedo in a snow-ice-land-ocean environment, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C01001,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001866" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001866</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Government of Canada: Canadian Ice Service archive: overview, available at: <a href="https://www.eodms-sgdot.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca" target="_blank"/>, last access: 16 December 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Government of Canada: Earth Observation
Data Management System, available at: <a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/ice-forecasts-observations/latest-conditions/archive-overview.html" target="_blank"/>, last access: 16 December 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Guemas, V., Chevallier, M., Déqué, M., Bellprat, O., and Doblas-Reyes,
F.: Impact of sea ice initialization on sea ice and atmosphere prediction
skill on seasonal timescales, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3889–3896, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066626" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066626</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Howell, S. E. L.  and Brady, M.: The dynamic response of sea ice to warming
in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 13119–13125,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085116</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Howell, S. E. L., Tivy, A., Yackel, J. J., and Scharien, R. K.: Application of a
SeaWinds/QuikSCAT sea ice melt algorithm for assessing melt dynamics in the
Canadian Arctic Archipelago, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 111, C07025, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003193</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Howell, S. E. L., Wohlleben, T., Komarov, A., Pizzolato, L., and Derksen, C.: Recent extreme light sea ice years in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: 2011 and 2012 eclipse 1998 and 2007, The Cryosphere, 7, 1753–1768, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1753-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1753-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Howell, S. E. L., Laliberté, F., Kwok, R., Derksen, C., and King, J.: Landfast ice thickness in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago from observations and models, The Cryosphere, 10, 1463–1475, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1463-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1463-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hu, X., Sun, J., Chan, T. O., and Myers, P. G.: Thermodynamic and dynamic ice thickness contributions in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago in NEMO-LIM2 numerical simulations, The Cryosphere, 12, 1233–1247, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1233-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1233-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Istomina, L., Heygster, G., Huntemann, M., Schwarz, P., Birnbaum, G., Scharien, R., Polashenski, C., Perovich, D., Zege, E., Malinka, A., Prikhach, A., and Katsev, I.: Melt pond fraction and spectral sea ice albedo retrieval from MERIS data – Part 1: Validation against in situ, aerial, and ship cruise data, The Cryosphere, 9, 1551–1566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1551-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1551-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Kwok, R.: Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage:
losses and coupled variability (1958–2018),  Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 105005,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae3ec" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae3ec</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Laliberté, F., Howell, S. E. L., and Kushner, P. J.: Regional variability of
a projected sea ice-free Arctic during the summer months, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 256–263,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066855" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066855</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Laliberté, F., Howell, S. E. L., Lemieux, J.-F., Dupont, F., and Lei, J.: What historical landfast ice observations tell us about projected ice conditions in Arctic archipelagoes and marginal seas under anthropogenic forcing, The Cryosphere, 12, 3577–3588, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3577-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3577-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Landy, J. C., Ehn, J. K., Shields, M., and Barber, D. G.: Surface and melt pond
evolution on landfast first-year sea ice in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago,
J. Geophys. Res., 119, 3054–3075, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Landy, J. C., Ehn, J. K., and Barber, D. G.: Albedo feedback enhanced by
smoother Arctic sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 710–714, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066712" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066712</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Lee, S., Stroeve, J. C., Tsamados, M., and Khand, A.L.: Machine learning
approaches to retrieve pan-Arctic melt ponds from visible satellite imagery,
Remote Sens. Environ., 247, 111919, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111919" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111919</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Lemieux, J.-F., Beaudoin, C., Dupont, F., Roy, F., Smith, G.C., Shlyaeva,
A., Buehner, M., Caya, A., Chen, J., Carrieres, T., Pogson, L.,
DeRepentigny, P., Plante, A., Pestieau, P., Pellerin, P., Ritchie, H.,
Garric, G., and Ferry, N.: The Regional Ice Prediction System (RIPS):
verification of forecast sea ice concentration, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 142, 632–643,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2526" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2526</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Li, H., Perrie, W., Li, Q., and Hou, Y.: Estimation of melt pond fractions
on first year sea ice using compact polarization SAR, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 8145–8166,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013248</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Song, M. H., Horton R. M., and Hu, Y.: Revisiting the potential of
melt pond fraction as a predictor for the seasonal Arctic sea ice extent
minimum, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054017</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Markus, T., Cavalieri, D. J., Tschudi, M. A., and Ivanoff, A.: Comparison of
aerial video and Landsat 7 data over ponded sea ice, Remote Sens. Environ., 86, 458–469, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Maslanik, J., Stroeve, J., Fowler, C., and Emery, W.: Distribution and
trends in Arctic sea ice age through spring 2011, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L13502,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047735</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Melling, H.: Sea ice of the northern Canadian Arctic Archipelago, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 3181, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001102</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Peng, G. and Meier, W. M.: Temporal and regional variability of Arctic
sea-ice coverage from satellite data, Ann. Glaciol., 59, 191–200,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2017.32" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2017.32</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Perovich, D. K.  and Polashenski., C.: Albedo evolution of seasonal Arctic
sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L08501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051432" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051432</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Perovich, D. K., Grenfell, T. C., Light, B., and Hobbs, P. V.: Seasonal
evolution of the albedo of multiyear Arctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8044,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000438" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000438</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Petty, A. A., Kurtz, N. T., Kwok, R., Markus, T., and Neumann, T. A.: Winter
Arctic sea ice thickness from ICESat-2 freeboards, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015764,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015764" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015764</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Pizzolato, L., Howell, S. E. L., Derksen, C., Dawson, J., and Copland, L.:
Changing sea ice conditions and marine transportation activity in Canadian
Arctic waters between 1990 and 2012, Climatic Change, 123, 161–173,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1038-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1038-3</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Polashenski, C., Perovich, D. K., and Courville, Z.: The mechanisms of sea
ice melt pond formation and evolution, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C01001,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007231" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007231</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Prinsenberg, S. J. and Hamilton, J.: Monitoring the volume, freshwater and
heat fluxes passing through Lancaster sound in the Canadian Arctic
Archipelago, Atmos.-Ocean, 43, 1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3137/ao.430101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3137/ao.430101</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Rösel, A., Kaleschke, L., and Birnbaum, G.: Melt ponds on Arctic sea ice determined from MODIS satellite data using an artificial neural network, The Cryosphere, 6, 431–446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-431-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-431-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Scharien, R. K., Hochheim, K., Landy, J., and Barber, D. G.: First-year sea ice melt pond fraction estimation from dual-polarisation C-band SAR – Part 2: Scaling in situ to Radarsat-2, The Cryosphere, 8, 2163–2176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2163-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2163-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Scharien, R. K., Segal, R., Nasonova, S., Nandan, V., Howell, S. E. L., and
Haas, C.: Winter Sentinel-1 backscatter as a predictor of spring Arctic sea
ice melt pond fraction, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 12262–12270,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075547" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075547</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Serreze, M. C., Holland, M. M., and Stroeve, J.: Perspectives on the Arctic's
shrinking sea-ice cover, Science, 315, 1533–1536, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Schröder, D., Feltham, D. L., Flocco, D., and Tsamados, M.: September
Arctic sea-ice minimum predicted by spring melt-pond fraction, Nat. Clim. Change, 4,
353–357, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2203</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Sigmond, M., Fyfe, J. C., Flato, G. M., Kharin, V. V., and Merryfield, W. J.:
Seasonal forecast skill of Arctic sea ice area in a dynamical forecast
system, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 529–534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50129" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50129</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Skyllingstad, E. D. and Polashenski, C.: Estimated heat budget during
summer melt of Arctic first-year sea ice
Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11789–11797, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080349</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Small, D.: Flattening gamma: Radiometric terrain correction for SAR imagery,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S., 49, 3081–3093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2120616" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2120616</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Sou, T. and Flato, G.: Sea ice in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: Modeling
the past (1950–2004) and the future (2041–60), J. Climate, 22, 2181–2198, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Stroeve, J. C., Serreze, M. C., Holland, M. M., Kay, J. E., Maslanik, J., and
Barrett, A. P.: The Arctic's rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: A research
synthesis, Climatic Change, 110, 1005–1027, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0101-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0101-1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Tivy, A., Howell, S. E. L., Alt, B., McCourt, S., Chagnon, R., Crocker, G.,
Carrieres, T., and Yackel, J. J.: Trends and variability in summer sea ice
cover in the Canadian Arctic based on the Canadian Ice Service Digital
Archive, 1960–2008 and 1968–2008, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C03007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005855" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005855</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Tschudi, M. A., Maslanik, J. A., and Perovich, D. K.: Derivation of melt pond
coverage on arctic sea ice using MODIS observation, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 2605–2614, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Tschudi, M. A., Meier, W. N., and Stewart, J. S.: An enhancement to sea ice motion and age products at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), The Cryosphere, 14, 1519–1536, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1519-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1519-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Universität Hamburg: Integrated Climate Data Center – ICDC, available at: <a href="https://icdc.cen.uni-hamburg.de/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 16 December 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Webster, M. A., Rigor, I. G., Perovich, D. K., Richter-Menge, J. A.,
Polashenski, C. M., and Light, B.: Seasonal evolution of melt ponds on Arctic
sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 5968–5982, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011030</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
