<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-12-2481-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Pore morphology of polar firn around closure revealed <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>by X-ray tomography</article-title><alt-title>X-ray tomography of polar firn</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{X-ray tomography of polar firn}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Burr et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Burr</surname><given-names>Alexis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ballot</surname><given-names>Clément</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Lhuissier</surname><given-names>Pierre</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5100-9716</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Martinerie</surname><given-names>Patricia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6820-2296</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>Christophe L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Philip</surname><given-names>Armelle</given-names></name>
          <email>armelle.philip@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CNRS, IRD, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, SIMaP, 38000 Grenoble, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Armelle Philip (armelle.philip@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>26</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>2481</fpage><lpage>2500</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>27</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e134">Understanding the slow densification process of polar firn into ice is
essential in order to constrain the age difference between the ice matrix and
entrapped gases. The progressive microstructure evolution of the firn column
with depth leads to pore closure and gas entrapment. Air transport models in
the firn usually include a closed porosity profile based on available data.
Pycnometry or melting–refreezing techniques have been used to obtain the
ratio of closed to total porosity and air content in closed pores,
respectively. X-ray-computed tomography is complementary to these methods, as
it enables one to obtain the full pore network in 3-D. This study takes
advantage of this nondestructive technique to discuss the morphological
evolution of pores on four different Antarctic sites. The computation of
refined geometrical parameters for the very cold polar sites Dome C and
Lock In (the two Antarctic plateau sites studied here) provides new
information that could be used in further studies. The comparison of these
two sites shows a more tortuous pore network at Lock In than at Dome C, which
should result in older gas ages in deep firn at Lock In. A comprehensive
estimation of the different errors related to X-ray tomography and to the
sample variability has been performed. The procedure described here may be
used as a guideline for further experimental characterization of firn
samples. We show that the closed-to-total porosity ratio, which is
classically used for the detection of pore closure, is strongly affected by
the sample size, the image reconstruction, and spatial heterogeneities. In
this work, we introduce an alternative parameter, the connectivity index,
which is practically independent of sample size and image acquisition
conditions, and that accurately predicts the close-off depth and density. Its
strength also lies in its simple computation, without any assumption of the
pore status (open or close). The close-off prediction is obtained for Dome C
and Lock In, without any further numerical simulations on
images (e.g., by permeability or
diffusivity calculations).</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page2482?><p id="d1e144">Ancient atmospheric air is embedded in polar ice caps, making them a major
source of data for reconstructing past climates
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.1"/>. For example, the EPICA community traced
climate variability back to 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> before present
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.2"/> from ice cores drilled at Dome Concordia (also named
Dome C). The firn layer (approximately the first 50–100 m of the ice
cores) is paramount in tackling the reconstruction of past climates, as the
gradual densification of snow to ice leads to air entrapment. This
firnication can last from a few centuries to a few thousand years before pore
occlusion, with the consequence that the entrapped air is younger than the
surrounding ice at a given depth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.3"/>.
Unambiguously linking gas composition (from the air) and temperature
evolution (from water isotopes in ice) in past climate conditions is
challenging. In addition, the progressive closure of pores usually leads to a
broad distribution of the trace gas ages. Seasonal layering of the polar firn
also influences this closure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In
other words, the precise evaluation of the gas–ice age difference
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>age) requires a detailed understanding of the densification and
gas trapping mechanisms.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p id="d1e177">A further complication is that, although the firn undergoes a similar
densification with depth until it converts into solid ice, each polar site
exhibits peculiar characteristics (local temperature, accumulation rate,
impurity content, topography, etc.). Thus, climate proxies and air dating
strongly depend on the polar sites investigated and there is now
substantial literature that proposes multi-site studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e183">The firn column is classically divided into three distinct zones
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.6"/>. When considering air circulation, a convective zone, where gases are mixed with the atmosphere in the top
layers due to the high permeability of snow and/or the effect of wind, is
first encountered.
Deeper in the firn, in the diffusive zone, molecular diffusion dominates and
gravitational fractionation also occurs. The lock-in depth (LID) is defined
as the depth at which gravitational fractionation stops <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.7"/>. In
the deepest firn zone named the lock-in zone (LIZ), the transport of gases in
open pores becomes limited and eventually stops because pores close and entrap air. At the bottom of this zone, the close-off depth (COD) is
the depth at which pores are fully isolated from the surface and at which air
cannot be pumped out of the firn anymore.</p>
      <p id="d1e192">Successive densification mechanisms appear along the firn column. Snow
undergoes grain rearrangement, fracture, and sintering until a critical
density of 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reached <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.8"/>. This
density corresponds to an approximate porosity of 40 %, close to the
porosity that characterizes a random close pack (RCP) of spheres <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.9"/>. As
for many other granular materials, further densification requires the plastic
deformation of the grains themselves. Above 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
dislocation creep becomes the dominant mechanism for densification
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.10"/>. The last stage of densification is porosity related. When
the density exceeds about 840 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pores are closed and
further shrinking is driven by the difference between their internal pressure
and the larger surrounding stress.</p>
      <p id="d1e257">The mechanisms of pore closure in deep firn are of interest in order to
understand the relationship between atmospheric signals and trace gas records
in firn and ice. Models of gas transport in firn generally include a
parameterization of the closed-to-total porosity ratio
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.11"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. However, only a few closed porosity datasets
are available
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.12"/>.
Moreover, some recent studies emphasize the effect of firn layering, further
motivating microstructural studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.13"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e273">The ratio of closed to total porosity may be obtained using two different
techniques: pycnometry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.14"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, and X-ray-computed
tomography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.15"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Air content measurements are
generally performed with melting–refreezing techniques used on samples taken well
below the bubble closure zone and used as a proxy of the average air
isolation density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.16"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Recently,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.17"/> measured air content in the LIZ of the WAIS Divide ice
core and used it as an indicator of the bubble closure rate. Each technique
comes with its own issues. Air content measurements, when performed on firn
samples, may artificially open some closed pores that are weakly sealed and
melting–refreezing is a destructive technique that forbids any further
microstructural investigation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.18"/>. Pycnometry only provides
a bulk closed porosity value without information on pore morphology. X-ray
tomography scans a rather small volume of firn, thus questioning the
representativeness of measured properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.19"/>. These three
techniques all have the issue of border effects in common. In particular, one
has to make assumptions on the closed or open status of cut pores. Regarding
this issue, the effect of cut pores seems nonetheless much smaller in the
case of air content data obtained from bubbles well below the LIZ
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, than in the case of
pycnometry or closed pores digitized by X-ray tomography on firn samples
taken in the LIZ.</p>
      <p id="d1e306">The X-ray tomography technique has received increasing interest in the last
20 years for investigating snow and firn microstructure
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.21"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.
Focusing on the microstructural evolution that accompanies the closure
process, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.22"/> demonstrated the potential of the method by
investigating the density and closed porosity evolution along the firn core
of Vostok. They uncovered significant discrepancies between the ratio of
closed porosity calculated from absorption images and measured by pycnometry.
They attributed these differences to the small scanned volumes
(0.785 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to those used when performing pycnometry
measurements (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.23"/> reported that the
stratification of firn has an effect on several properties such as structural
anisotropy, crystal orientated fabric, and the total air content at Dome
Fuji. Other Antarctic sites (WAIS Divide and Megadunes in East Antarctica)
were also investigated. WAIS Divide exhibits a high accumulation rate and
relatively warm temperature, whereas Megadunes is very cold, with a very
low accumulation rate. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.24"/> performed X-ray tomography and
permeability measurements on these firn cores. They concluded that the
coldest site is characterized by a less tortuous pore morphology. Taking into
account the strong layering exhibited in WAIS Divide, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.25"/>
also proposed that the air flow in polar firn is mainly controlled by pore
structure and not so much by density variability. Focusing on the Summit site
in Greenland, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.26"/> closely studied finely
grained layers in the firn. Their results
indicate that the ratio of the number of closed pores to the pore volume is
marked by a sharp increase that related well with the LID.
<?pagebreak page2483?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.27"/> also used such a parameter but no relation with the LID
can be observed in their Fig. 7. In contrast to this index, the increase in
the closed-to-total porosity ratio is in better agreement with the LID.
Overall, the literature on firn tomography concentrates on studying the
evolution of structural parameters (such as permeability) and their
relation to gas transport within the firn. It also focuses on differentiating
polar sites, or relating microstructure to deformation mechanisms. However,
despite giving useful information for densification modeling
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, these X-ray tomography studies do
not provide an unambiguous prediction of LIZ and COD. To that end, the recent
work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.29"/> uses X-ray tomography to scan very large volumes
of firn from three different polar sites. Their study depicts an abrupt
closure of pores when reaching a critical porosity (around 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
that is independent of the temperature site.</p>
      <p id="d1e371">More generally, for X-ray tomography to become a reliable reference technique
for firn investigation, errors due to acquisition (voxel size or resolution),
image analysis (image thresholding, labeling of pores), and sample variability
(size and spatial heterogeneities) and their impact on the microstructural
properties should be thoroughly studied. This effort has already started for
modeling based on X-ray tomography images, whether for physical effective
properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.30"/> or for snow mechanics
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.31"/>. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.32"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.33"/> modeled the firn permeability with a lattice Boltzmann
technique on a layered firn column using X-ray images. These authors worked
out a representative volume element for permeability, going beyond the sole
density as performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.34"/>, for example.</p>
      <p id="d1e389">In this context, here we investigate in detail the error sources that come
with the process of X-ray tomography imaging on two East Antarctica firn
cores originating from Dome C and Lock In (located 136 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> away from
the Concordia station towards Dumont d'Urville). We gather several
microstructural parameters, such as density, closed-to-total porosity
ratio, surface area, and anisotropy, in order to study the closure of pores. We
are able to discriminate which parameters correlate to the COD, as defined by
the ultimate firn air pumping depth.</p>
      <p id="d1e399">The paper is organized as follows. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> details the
characteristics of the sites studied here. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> focuses
on the errors originating from reconstruction and image processing of
tomographic scans. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, we investigate the
scale effect and determine the errors generated for the main physical
properties studied when decreasing the resolution in the tomographic scans.
Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> focuses on the comparison among four different
sites, with particular interest in the two sites studied in this work (namely
Dome C and Lock In), along with the polar sites detailed
in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.35"/>. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/> takes advantage
of image analysis tools to compute refined microstructural parameters that
characterize the pore network throughout densification.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Site characteristics</title>
      <p id="d1e422">Two sites in Antarctica are studied, Dome C and Lock In<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d1e425">Note that
Lock In is a polar site and does not refer to the lock-in phenomenon.</p></fn>. Dome C, near Concordia station, exhibits very cold mean annual temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and low snow accumulation rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> water equivalent per year, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Moreover, Dome C is at 3233 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> a.s.l., with a thickness of
nearly 3300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of ice. These characteristics make it an interesting
site for drilling, as it shelters old ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.36"/>. Another
distinctive feature of this site is the very narrow non-diffusive zone
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.37"><named-content content-type="pre">LIZ about 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>;</named-content></xref>. The ultimate
depth reached to sample air by pumping is 99.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.38"/>. The ice cores studied come from the Volsol
project carried out in 2010/2011 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.39"/>. The firn samples
originate from a unique ice core. Three ice samples (115.05, 123.34, and
132.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the DC12 ice core drilled in 2012 were also
analyzed.</p>
      <p id="d1e540">The Lock In site is located 136 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> away from the Concordia station
towards the French base Dumont d'Urville. This site was sampled during the
austral summer 2015–2016, and is characterized by a higher snow
accumulation rate of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first guess
from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="altparen.40"/>). The borehole temperature is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of depth. The LID is located
between 96 and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Anaïs J. Orsi, personal communication,
2017), and air could not be pumped below approximately 108 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
indicating that the COD is deeper than for Dome C. A summary of the different
site characteristics is given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e634">Characteristics of different polar sites that were studied with X-ray
tomography. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the accumulation rate. The close-off depth is
defined as the ultimate depth at which air could be sampled. The lock-in zone
is the width between the LID (depth at which gravitational fractionation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N stops) and the COD and is defined as the LIZ width. The
temperature is the mean annual temperature or borehole
temperature.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (cm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">LIZ width (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">COD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dome C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a,b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 123<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lock In</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">74<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>8.310<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 126<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>9.510<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">108.3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dome Fuji<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b,d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>19<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 39<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">104</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vostok<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a,b,e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 106<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>48<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WAIS Divide<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>f,g</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>46.300<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 112<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>12.317<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Megadunes<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>f,h</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>77.914<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 124<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>48.796<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Summit<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>i,j</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>34.48<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>38.24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e658"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.41"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.42"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Anaïs J. Orsi (personal
communication, 2017). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.43"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.44"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.45"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.46"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>h</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.47"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.48"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>j</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.49"/>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1500">A firn sample from Dome C
(100.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) inside the cold cell during X-ray tomography imaging, with
associated 3-D images of a firn sample and of its pore network.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Acquisition parameters</title>
      <?pagebreak page2484?><p id="d1e1527">X-ray microcomputed tomography was performed on samples coming from a large
range of depths with a refined characterization close to the depth at which
closure of pores initiates. The majority of the samples are labeled
S (for small) from Dome C and Lock In, named DC-S12 and LI-S12 (see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> for information on resolution of samples, which
varies between 12 and 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). S12 refers to small samples with a
voxel side length of 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These were drilled with a milling
machine in slices of ice core such that the cylinder axis is along the core
axis (vertical axis). The uncertainty of depth after drilling in slices is
estimated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for all Lock In samples and most Dome C
samples (a few sample depths are known at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Samples
were machined down to a diameter of 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with a lathe. The machining
operations were performed in a cold room at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, usually
the day before scanning. Scanning geometry was helical in order to image long
samples (from 12 to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a volume more than twice the value
typically studied by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.50"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.51"/>. Scans were
performed at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with 800 radiographs over four turns leading to a
scan time of approximately 25 min per sample. Samples were positioned in a
cold cell, cooled by air at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thanks to the coupling
of an air dryer and a cryostat. The temperature was controlled by a
thermocouple positioned against the sample holder inside the cell. Schematic
of the setup and geometry of the samples are shown in
Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1666">Schematic of the different sample sizes used in this work. Sample
characteristics are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. In green, large
samples (L) of the firn core were characterized with X-ray tomography using a
voxel side length of 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Zooming inside the L samples enables
us
to obtain medium-sized samples (typical of the size used in pycnometry
measurements) named M and shown in red. These were scanned at 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (DC-M30). More than 40 samples (shown in blue) of size S were machined
separately and scanned at 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both sites (samples DC-S12 and
LI-S12).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1710">Three-dimensional image characteristics from Dome C (DC) and Lock In (LI). Samples
are scanned with an acceleration voltage of 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> except for DC-M30
and DC-S30 volumes, scanned under 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. DC-L60 samples have a
polyhedron geometry. M and S volumes are cylindrical. DC-C12 and LI-C12 are
cubic (C) subvolumes of DC-S12 and LI-S12, respectively. For DC-L60 to
DC-S30, the region of interest (ROI) comes from the same three large samples (L).
DC-S12 and DC-C12 come from the same 29 S samples. LI-S12 and LI-C12 come
from the same 13 S samples. The number at the end of volume name refers to
the voxel size in microns.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="justify" colwidth="119.501575pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="2">Origin</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="2">Name</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Diameter/</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ROI</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Voxel</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7" morerows="2">Depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{119.501575pt}?><oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="2">Remarks</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">side (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">volume</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">size</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">of ROI</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">of ROI</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">volumes</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DC-L60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">87.34; 94.5; 100.33</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Slice of ice core from Dome C</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DC-M60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">”</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Zoom within the DC-L60 samples</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DC-M30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">”</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Scans within the L samples</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DC-S30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.305</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">”</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Subvolumes from the DC-M30 samples</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DC-S12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.782–1.781</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.33–100.38</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Cylinders taken from ice core slices</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DC-C12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.72</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">”</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Cubic subvolumes from the DC-S12 samples</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LI</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LI-S12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.303–1.738</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">66–120</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Samples from Lock In</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LI</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LI-C12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.72</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">”</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Cubic subvolumes from the LI-S12 samples</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2097">Three samples labeled L (for large) were also characterized to investigate
the scale effect. They were placed in polystyrene boxes with an eutectic cold
pack inside. Samples and cold pack inertia kept the temperature below
0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to an observed
maximum at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 1.5 h (corresponding to two scans).
According to metamorphism experiments of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.52"/> and considering
the thermal inertia of these large samples, any microstructural evolution
should be negligible during the 1.5 h scanning time. Moreover, two samples
were scanned a first time, kept at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 6 months, and
then scanned a second time. No evolution was observed. Volumes M (for medium)
were also locally scanned inside the L samples, i.e., a second scan is
performed at a higher resolution (using a voxel size of 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
instead of 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a larger acceleration voltage (80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
instead of 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Due to the size of the detector, and the position
of the cold cell with respect to the X-ray source, there are no M12, L12, or
L30 samples that could have been scanned. Sample characteristics are detailed in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> and the extracted volumes are illustrated in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2485?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Reconstruction and image processing</title>
      <p id="d1e2227">Reconstruction of the 3-D sample structure is carried out with a
filtered-back projection algorithm while image processing uses the free
software Fiji <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.53"/>. For S12 samples, a median filter of
size 3 is first performed with the plug-in Analysis 3-D developed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.54"/> in order to reduce noise and enhance contrast. The high
contrast between air and ice ensures a straightforward threshold of 3-D
binary images. Outliers (persisting noise artifacts) of 2 or 3 voxels were
removed, leading to the loss of some micropores with a diameter smaller than
36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This represents less than 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total
porosity and leads to an estimated 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> error for density.</p>
      <p id="d1e2260">A cylindrical region of interest (ROI) is systematically extracted from the
digitized sample to ensure that the analysis is not perturbed by ice
fragments localized on the sample borders (typically originating from
machining). Pore<?pagebreak page2486?> labeling is also performed on this ROI using the Analysis 3D
plug-in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.55"/>. All extracted ROIs are detailed in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. The errors introduced successively by the
potential sublimation of matter inside the cell during scanning time, the
reconstruction, and the image processing (filtering and thresholding) were
determined as follows. On a smaller sample height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>),
tomographic scans lasting 5 min were repeated during 3 h on a 86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
deep sample from Dome C, first, every 5 min, then with increasing
intervals of time. The results for these 12 scans have shown that sublimation
was limited to the outward 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the cylindrical sample after
30 min, even for a porosity for which percolation is significant. As borders
are eliminated after extraction of the ROI (diameter of 9.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for S
samples with a diameter of 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), there is no influence of the dry
air circulation around the firn in the cold cell. Multiple acquisitions of the same sample
allow a global error to be computed. This includes errors from acquisition procedure,
image reconstruction and Fiji processing (median
filter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> thresholding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> outliers removal).</p>
      <p id="d1e2330">Several firn properties such as the density,
the specific surface area (SSA), and other pore-related parameters are determined in this work. The SSA is
defined as the surface of the pores over the total sample volume. The surface
is computed with the marching cube algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.56"/>. The SSA is
used to quantify the air–ice interactions (e.g., to compute the
snow-to-atmosphere flux of adsorbed molecules on snow; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.57"/>)
or to work out the grain size of firn cores <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.58"/>. The volume
used to compute total porosity is calculated by counting voxels. The closed-to-total porosity ratio and the connectivity index (the ratio of the volume
of the largest pore to the total pore volume) are also systematically
calculated. We characterize a closed pore as a pore that does not touch the
border of the ROI at the sample resolution. The pore volume fraction is
defined as the closed-to-total porosity ratio (as a percentage). Results for these
parameters are discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2344">The 12 successive scans of the same sample are used to compute standard
deviations. At 86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of depth, absolute errors are
1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for density, 0.008 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SSA, 0.068 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the connectivity index, and
0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the closed porosity ratio, while relative standard errors
are respectively 0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since this procedure was performed on only one sample, we
assume that the relative errors associated with each microstructural parameter
are the same for all depths. In other words, we assume that the precision
(from X-ray scans and image processing) for a given property is independent of
depth for all S12 samples.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Representativeness of morphological parameters</title>
      <p id="d1e2435">Conducting a refined X-ray characterization and comparison of polar firn
requires a correct estimation of possible errors. In addition to precision, several
other sources of errors exist which do not have the same influence on the
results. These errors can come from spatial heterogeneity, size of the ROI,
image resolution, image processing, and labeling assumptions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2438">This section focuses on giving estimates of these errors for the important
parameters studied: the density, the closed porosity ratio, the connectivity
index, and the SSA. These errors depend on depth, except for
the numerical ones from reconstruction and image processing for which we
assume an independent relative value. Results presented hereafter can be
useful for future tomographic studies that should advantageously
include error and variability estimations.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Density</title>
      <p id="d1e2446">Densities were determined directly from binary images using
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and are shown against depth for both
sites in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a. We also attempted to measure density by
weighting samples as carried out in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.59"/>. However, we observed that
this method led to a very large dispersion, which may be linked to a too
small sample volume. In any case, we chose to link the density measurement
directly to the local scanned volume. We believe that this is preferable
to ascribing a density originating from a much larger volume as carried out by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.60"/>, which may not be representative of the actual scanned
sample.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2491"><bold>(a)</bold> Evolution of density with depth for Dome C and Lock In.
<bold>(b)</bold> Zoom-in from <bold>(a)</bold> focused on Dome C for various ROI
sizes (S, M, L) and voxel sizes (12, 30, and 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Box plots
contain data from DC-S30 volumes. Hereafter, boxes represent lower and upper
quartiles, the black lines inside being the median values. The confidence
interval is set to account for all the data (no outliers). Green dots
[Led2015] in <bold>(a)</bold> are data obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.61"/> from
volume and mass measurements of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> thick samples from a Dome C ice
core down to 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The blue dashed line [Bre2017] corresponds to a
mean density profile of Dome C averaged on a 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scale from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.62"/>. The blue shaded area in <bold>(b)</bold> represents a
standard deviation of 6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the fit and density data
as given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.63"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2576">Results and differences between DC-M30 and M60 samples. Results with
6 and 26 connected voxels are shown.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">87.34 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">94.50 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">100.33 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vox. size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">813.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">807.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">818.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">818.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">845.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">839.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SSA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.970</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.954</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.016</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.973</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.042</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.711</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.713</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>): co-6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">47.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">82.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">83.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>): co-26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">46.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">65.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">82.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">83.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>): co-6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">76.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>): co-26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">76.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3108">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a illustrates the increase in density with depth. It
also shows that for a given depth, the density at Dome C is larger than at
Lock In. As stated above, the relative error in measuring density is less
than 0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus is not shown here. For approximately the same
depth, differences between the density of Dome C and Lock In samples are
between 1.8 and 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (in the range of depths studied).</p>
      <p id="d1e3127">The density of Dome C samples obtained with X-ray tomography superimposes
correctly with the scattered data of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.64"/>, who worked out
density by measuring the mass and volume of samples 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> long. The
high-resolution density measurements performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.65"/>
required a large number of samples (30 to 37 samples in every 2 m
layer), thus explaining the
observed scattering in their measurements.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2487?><p id="d1e3143">Densification of firn into ice leads to a transition at which an open pore,
which enabled air to flow, begins to separate into different pores. This
closure of pores occurs all along the firn core but is more pronounced just
before the close-off, typically when density ranges between 800 and
840 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where we gathered more data points.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b is a zoom-in on this region for Dome C. A mean
density profile was proposed at Dome C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.66"/> and goes below
80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a standard deviation of 6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While
DC-S12 densities and the density profile [Bre2017] seem in accordance before
85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a, they diverge deeper in the firn in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b, with DC-S12 densities being above the density
profile and its standard deviation. Except for samples from 94.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
calculating the density from a binary image seems to overestimate the mean
density by approximately 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 85–100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range. Three
DC-S12 samples were extracted from the same slice of ice core at 86, 91, and
98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of depth. These triplets of points are barely distinguishable.
The red box plots shown in this figure represent the extrema on 13 subvolume
measurements (small DC-S30 images) originating from a medium-sized DC-M30
sample. These box plots show dispersion inside medium-sized samples
(subvolumes of 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inside 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The difference
between the maximal and minimal values for samples from the same depth is
less than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (maximum variability is obtained at 94.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Thus, the effects of spatial heterogeneities and of the size of the ROI are
limited but are the main contributions to the variability in the density.
Indeed, three additional S samples were scanned at a voxel side length of 12
and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and exhibited differences of less than 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
for density. Similarly, the difference between densities of the samples
DC-M30 and DC-M60 is less than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). The layered nature of polar firn has already
been studied and discussed in the literature
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.67"/>, and could be detected using X-ray scanning
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.68"/>. Very cold polar sites such as Dome C with
low accumulation usually exhibit limited layering <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.69"/>;
however, the recent work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.70"/> does show layering at the
centimeter scale for the low-accumulation sites of Vostok and Dome C. Our
sample shape and discontinuous measurements do not allow us to discuss such
anomalies in polar firn. In conclusion, according to the relatively low
variability among samples in terms of density, DC-S12 samples are large
enough to estimate the density of a slice of firn of the same height within
2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> errors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3318">Evolution of closed pores (red) within the firn porosity network
(grey) for different depths at Dome C and Lock In sites for DC-C12 and LI-C12
volumes (cross-section dimension is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Note
that <bold>(a, e)</bold>, <bold>(b, f)</bold>, <bold>(c, g)</bold>, and <bold>(d, h)</bold>
have approximately the same density. <bold>(i)</bold> Close-up view from a DC-C12
volume of a few channels among pores at different stages of the pinching
process illustrated by areas A, B, C, and D.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Closed porosity</title>
      <p id="d1e3372">The closed-to-total porosity ratio (CP) is obtained by dividing the total
volume of closed pores (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the ROI by the total volume of
pores (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pores</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M222" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pores</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3422">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows the evolution of closed
pores (in red) within the firn pore network for Dome C and Lock In. The
number of closed pores increases with depth, and separation<?pagebreak page2488?> persists even
for pores already closed. We observed that the separation of pores arises by
pinching of the channel linking two larger globular portions of the pore as
illustrated by Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>i. Areas A and B in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>i show examples of channels on the
verge of disappearing, while areas C and D highlight newly pinched pores (dead
ends).</p>
      <p id="d1e3431">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a shows a steep increase in the closed porosity
ratio for DC-S12 samples, starting at 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of depth (corresponding
to approximately 780 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b, at
86, 91, and 98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of depth, three DC-S12 samples were extracted from the
same slice of ice core to evaluate dispersion (area A in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a). The DC-S30 volumes are represented by
box plots, which are rather large (especially at 94.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of depth). Boxes
represent lower and upper quartiles of the distribution of the closed
porosity ratio, with the median value in black. The confidence intervals take
into account all data points. Spatial heterogeneities in the closed porosity
ratio strongly depend on depth. This variability among small volumes is
particularly pronounced at 94.5 and 98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, but smaller when closed
pores are few (at 87.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) or after the COD as defined by the last
firn air pumping depth (sample from 100.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the COD is at
99.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx69" id="altparen.71"/>). This leaves two
possibilities. First, the firn may be very heterogeneous horizontally,
meaning that a single DC-S12 sample is not representative enough for the
closed porosity ratio of the firn for this particular depth. Second, it could
mean that our definition of a closed pore is not appropriate, due to the
sample boundary conditions. Note that for such depths (94.5 and
98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), the mean size of a closed pore is still likely too large to
hold inside the DC-S12 samples.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3520">Evolution of the closed porosity as a percentage of total
porosity against <bold>(a)</bold> depth and <bold>(b)</bold> density for various
sample sizes (S, M, L) and voxel sizes (12, 30, and 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
variability in the closed porosity of various samples from the same depth is
represented by red box plots in <bold>(a)</bold> and red dots in <bold>(b)</bold> as
densities are not exactly identical.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3552">ROI size also has a strong influence on the estimation of the closed porosity
ratio. Indeed, the larger the volume, the larger the closed porosity ratio
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). Note that this effect is more pronounced at
100.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (compare volumes DC-M30 and DC-S12) than at 87.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of
depth. Errors due to coarsening in resolution are summarized in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> and reveal a significant effect on the results
between the DC-M30 and DC-M60 volumes<fn id="Ch1.Footn2"><p id="d1e3573">DC-M60 and DC-M30 have the
same ROI, but are scanned for a voxel side length of 30 and 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
respectively (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>)</p></fn>. The closed porosity ratio is
always larger when increasing the voxel size, and this effect is similar to
the one of the ROI volume. For labeling, the type of connectivity (6 or 26)
is also investigated, and its influence on the results is limited for all
resolutions considered. Using 26 connected voxels does enhance the
possibility for different pores to be more connected than it is with only 6
connected voxels as cubic voxels are not only connected through faces (6) but
also through edges and corners (26). It is especially true at the depths of
87.34 and 94.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as this is where pinching is very pronounced and on
the verge of cutting pore channels. Thus a change in the definition of the pores
as implied by the use of 26 connected voxels might connect some closed pores
together or to the surface. Similarly, coarsening the resolution means a
different threshold value when segmenting the image and thus a possible
separation of pores or channels. This seems to be especially true for low
resolution, e.g., here for a voxel size of 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Indeed,
differences related to voxel size between the same volumes DC-S12 and DC-S30
are smaller, as the relative error for the closed porosity ratio is less
than 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution (see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). This is relatively low compared to the extent
of the box plot represented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, which spans
from 16 to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 94.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of depth.</p>
      <p id="d1e3643">All the samples and the subvolumes extracted are plotted versus density in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b. While the smallest volumes seem to follow a
trend, the largest ones are still spread (area B in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b). From this plot it is impossible to determine
at which density or closed porosity ratio the close-off could be
unambiguously identified. Considering air content in firn, the
parameterization from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.72"/> assumes that the volume fraction of
closed pores is approximately 37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the average air isolation
level (defined as the average porous volume or density of air isolation
calculated from air content measurements;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.73"/>). Conversely, at 94.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
depth DC-M30 and DC-L60 volumes showed that 47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to 82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
pores are closed at 94.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of depth, for example. Such high values
could suggest that the close-off occurs at a shallower depth than commonly
accepted. However, the density of this sample (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">821</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
is lower than the average air isolation density obtained by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.74"/> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">840</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and air was pumped
out of the firn down to 99.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.75"/>, which is 5 m
below the DC-L60 sample taken at 94.5 m of depth. Additionally, the rather
large voxel size leads to separation of pores that are linked by channels the
diameter of which is below the image resolution, artificially increasing the
closed porosity ratio.</p>
      <p id="d1e3764">Therefore, the rather large errors for the closed porosity ratio of DC-L60
samples call for caution in interpreting results (see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). In short, the most appropriate use of the
closed porosity ratio requires large volumes associated with high
resolutions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3771">Evolution of the connectivity index (volume of the largest pore
divided by total pore volume) with <bold>(a)</bold> depth and
<bold>(b)</bold> density. The variability in the connectivity index of various
samples from the same depth is represented by red box plots in <bold>(a)</bold>
and red dots in <bold>(b)</bold> as the densities are not exactly identical.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page2489?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Connectivity index</title>
      <p id="d1e3799">In this section, we propose an alternative indicator of the pore closure,
which is much less sensitive to the source of errors that characterize the
closed porosity ratio, especially the sample size. The connectivity index
(CI) is defined by the ratio between the volume of the largest pore
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>largest_pore</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the total volume of pores (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pores</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M254" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>largest_pore</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pores</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3849">It was originally introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.76"/> to depict void coalescence
in bread. It proved useful (under the name “interlinkage parameter”) in
quantifying the coalescence of cavities during superplastic deformation of an
aluminum alloy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.77"/>, or as a criterion to optimize box sizes
when smoothing density maps of graphite with inclusions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.78"/>.
The evolution of the connectivity index leads to pertinent information on the<?pagebreak page2490?> percolation
process of pores, as it describes how the largest pore evolves with the drop
in the total pore volume. It tends to 0 when all pores are separated and/or
shrinking. The trend is paramount for connectivity index interpretation, as fluctuations
could mean unusual change in pore size distribution. Contrary to the closed
porosity ratio, the connectivity index is independent of sample boundary
conditions since all pores are considered. This is critical for small
volumes as the ratio of surface to volume becomes significant. However, it
is very dependent on the statistical size of pores and their number inside
the samples.</p>
      <p id="d1e3861">As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, the connectivity index is
maximum and close to 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> when the porosity is totally open (one
large pore overcomes all others; the pore network is almost fully
interconnected), while it is very small (less than 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>) when all pores are closed. The connectivity
index drops around 780 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
stagnates after 850 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Subsampling leads to
large box plots and thus large variability at 87.34 and 94.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while it
is much smaller at 100.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus spatial heterogeneity is pronounced
during the drop in the connectivity index. DC-M30 or DC-L60 volumes are
inside or close to the box plot. This is in contrast with the closed porosity
ratio in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> in which DC-M30 or DC-L60 volumes are far
from the box plot. This means that the use of the connectivity index induces a
much weaker effect of the ROI volume. Comparing resolution and type of
connectivity of the DC-S12 and DC-S30 volumes, results for the connectivity
index are similar to the closed porosity ratio (differences of less than
7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>
also lists errors between the DC-M30 and DC-M60 volumes for the connectivity
index. Overall, these ROIs fall in the box plots of the DC-S30 volumes (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a).</p>
      <p id="d1e3971">In conclusion, the variability in the connectivity index comes mostly from
the horizontal spatial heterogeneity. It is much less sensitive to the volume
of the samples, the resolution, or the type of connected voxels than the
closed porosity ratio. Interestingly, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b
indicates that the connectivity index points fall on a master curve when
plotted against the density. In particular, a clear drop in the connectivity
index is observed at a density of about 830 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Above this
density, DC-L60 and DC-M30 exhibit no large pores anymore. At Dome C, the
last firn air pumping depth is 99.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.79"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.80"/> obtained a density of 840 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
average air isolation level from air content measurements. Thus, according to
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, the connectivity index is a good predictor
of the close-off. However, it does not give any information on the LID, which
is required for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>age estimation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Specific surface area</title>
      <p id="d1e4039">The SSA involves the quantification of the surface of the pores. This
measurement is voxel size dependent due to the surface roughness. However,
as shown by Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>–<xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>,
differences of voxel size do not lead to too large of an error. Changes due to
ROI volume and connectivities are also not significant for the SSA. These
results are very similar to those obtained for density; however, the effect
of the spatial heterogeneity is more pronounced. Indeed, in the worst case
scenario, relative differences for the same depth can reach up to
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. All the other sources of errors give results in the range of
the variability in the horizontal spatial heterogeneities. Also, all data
points are known very precisely as pores are defined by a large number of
voxels. In the following, the surface-area-to-volume ratio is used instead of
the SSA for comparison with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.81"/>. Both parameters mostly
reflect the pore surface. However the volume considered for the
surface-area-to-volume ratio is the porous phase instead of the whole ROI.
The relative standard error for the surface-area-to-volume ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><caption><p id="d1e4081">Results and differences between DC-S12 and S30
samples.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.9}[.9]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">89.5 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">94.5 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vox. size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5"><caption><p id="d1e4273">Absolute and relative errors for two DC-S12 samples. Relative errors
are determined thanks to Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.9}[.9]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">84.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Abs. err.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">97.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Abs. err.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Rel. err.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">788.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">841.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SSA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.192</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.010</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.750</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.478</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.040</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.108</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.043</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>): co-6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>): co-26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>): co-6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88.654</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.098</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.883</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>): co-26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88.654</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.098</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.883</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page2491?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>Key results on error estimations</title>
      <p id="d1e4736">To sum up, in this section we have separately characterized the errors
associated with the calculated microstructural parameters when choosing the
resolution, the type of connected voxels, and the size of the sample.
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> and Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> showed that the variability in the results can
be significant and is dependent on the depth of the sample. The closed
porosity ratio was shown to be dependent on ROI size, voxel size, and spatial
heterogeneities. When plotted versus density, the connectivity index is
revealed
to be a very appropriate parameter to describe the progressive pore closure.
The proposed connectivity index is a more discriminant parameter to describe
the pore closure, as it is foremost dependent on spatial heterogeneities.</p>
      <p id="d1e4745">The precise determination of microstructural parameters requires a small
voxel size. With X-ray tomography, this means a small sample volume.
Therefore, in the following, only samples whose voxel side length is
12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are studied and compared. In order to avoid overloading the
following figures, uncertainties are not displayed but
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/> allows the absolute uncertainties for two
distinct depths of the DC-S12 samples to be reported.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Multi-site comparisons</title>
      <p id="d1e4768">In this section, we compare our data retrieved from Dome C and Lock In to
those originating from WAIS Divide (West Antarctica) and
Megadunes (East Antarctica) from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.82"/>, which were also analyzed with X-ray tomography. We
focus on the closed porosity ratio and morphological parameters that can be
compared for all four sites. We note however that the depth intervals
probed for the WAIS Divide and Megadunes sites are smaller than ours. Temperature and accumulation
conditions for WAIS Divide and Megadunes are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>; porosity closes at a
much shallower depth, between 60 and 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for WAIS Divide and
Megadunes, as indicated by
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a, than Dome C and Lock In. In contrast, pore
closure occurs below 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for Dome C and Lock In. The Lock In site
has a larger accumulation rate and is a bit warmer than Dome C but exhibits a
deeper closure of pores. When plotting the percentage of closed porosity
against density, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b shows that all points fall
approximately on a master curve. This supports the idea that the close-off
arises on first approximation at a particular density. Note that the
Megadunes site is peculiar, as a dune
experiences continuous snow deposition on its sides and has an average of
zero accumulation in “hiatus” zones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.83"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4800">Comparison among four polar sites – Dome C, Lock In, WAIS Divide,
and Megadunes – of the closed
porosity evolution with <bold>(a)</bold> depth and <bold>(b)</bold> density. Diamonds
are data points from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.84"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f07.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e4818">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> shows three morphological parameters of interest
(degree of anisotropy, surface-area-to-volume ratio of pores, and structure
model index (SMI)) that can be compared for all four sites. The evolution of
these parameters is shown against depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a, c, e) and
against density (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b, d, f). These geometrical parameters
provide valuable information on the pore network morphology that could be
useful for the understanding of firnification.</p>
      <p id="d1e4827">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a, b show the degree of anisotropy that was
determined using the BoneJ plug-in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.85"/> on the pore phase.
This parameter is calculated using a 3-D mean intercept length method that directly
works out all possible directions. An ellipsoid is fitted to the
scaled intercepted points, giving eigenvalues for the lengths of the
ellipsoid axes. The degree of anisotropy of the morphology is 0 for a fully
isotropic structure and tends to unity when all objects are aligned along a
direction. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a, b indicate that for all four sites, the
degree of anisotropy is rather low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with a mean value on the
order of 0.2. No clear trend is observable with depth or density.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2492?><p id="d1e4848">The surface-area-to-volume ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the pores is depicted in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c, d. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be seen as a good descriptor of the
complexity of the pore network morphology. In the case of pores as shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, pore roughness is similar for
both sites (pore surfaces are smooth). Therefore, a less tortuous network
leads to a smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. In contrast with anisotropy
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a, b) a clear difference is observable between Dome C
and Lock In sites on the one hand and WAIS Divide and
Megadunes sites on the other hand.
Our data indicate a fairly smooth trend for the Dome C and Lock In sites,
whereas the WAIS Divide and Megadunes sites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.86"/> show much more variability on a rather
limited depth interval. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.87"/> characterized samples from
both finely grained and coarsely grained layers. The microstructural
differences that inherently come with fine and coarse grains should explain
the variability observed in their results. Concentrating on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio
against density (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>d), and focusing on the limited common
density interval (750–850 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we note that WAIS Divide
exhibits the most tortuous pore network. The Megadunes site
leads to a pore network the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of which are in between those of Dome C and Lock In, but again with a
much larger variability. Although relatively limited, there is a clear
difference between Dome C and Lock In, with Dome C consistently exhibiting
smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than Lock In, either for the same density or for
the same depth. Thus, Lock In presents, for a given depth or density, a more
tortuous pore network than Dome C. Dome C and Lock In <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values follow
approximately a linear increase with depth.</p>
      <p id="d1e4968">The structure model index (SMI) is a popular index in the bone research
community which is implemented in the SkyScan software CT-analyzer
(<uri>http://bruker-microct.com</uri>, last access: 19 July 2018) used by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.88"/>. It was also used to analyze snow metamorphism for
instance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.89"/>. The SMI describes the shape of
pores, with positive values for convex shapes and negative values for
concave ones. The SMI tends to 0 for plates, 3 for rods, and 4 for spherical
particles. Two different methods are available to compute the SMI: the
SkyScan plug-in and the BoneJ plug-in with the Hildebrand algorithms
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.90"/>. As highlighted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.91"/>, the SkyScan
plug-in consistently leads to smaller SMI values than the Hildebrand
plug-in. For the sake of comparison with the data of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.92"/>,
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>e, f show the structure model index (SMI) of the porous
phase obtained with both methods. As for the SSA, the SMI is computed using
the pore surface area. Consequently, uncertainties are negligible and not
shown.</p>
      <p id="d1e4992">As for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter, the SMI computed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.93"/> (using
the SkyScan plug-in) exhibits a much larger variability than ours. In
other words, the pore shapes measured at WAIS Divide range from
semicylindrical to nearly spherical for a rather limited span of depth
(55–70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) or density. In contrast, data points from Dome C and
Lock In follow a clear trend, which suggests a simple evolution from rod-like
to sphere-like shape for increasing depth or density.</p>
      <p id="d1e5017">We have checked that the difference between WAIS Divide and
Megadunes on the one hand and
Dome C and Lock In data on the other hand does not originate from the
different methodologies used in the two groups by computing the SMI of Dome C
and Lock In with the same plug-in used for WAIS Divide and
Megadunes. As shown by
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>e, f, the SkyScan plug-in leads indeed to smaller SMI
values than Hildebrand algorithms. But this does not contradict the general
picture that Dome C – Lock In and WAIS Divide –
Megadunes sites differ markedly when
considering the morphology of pores. In any case, we believe that the linear
evolution observed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>e, f for Dome C and Lock In is
pertinent as it relates well with the change in pore morphology shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5028">Anisotropy <bold>(a, b)</bold>, surface-area-to-volume
ratio <bold>(c, d)</bold>, and structure model index <bold>(e, f)</bold> plotted
against depth and density for Dome C and Lock In (this work) as well as for
WAIS Divide and Megadunes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.94"/>. The SMI for Dome C and Lock In is computed using both
the Hildebrand method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.95"/> and the SkyScan plug-in.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{height=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f08.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Refined geometrical parameters for Dome C and Lock In sites</title>
      <p id="d1e5058">In the preceding section, we have compared four different sites using
available data from the literature. In this section, we take advantage of the
collected 3-D images for Dome C and Lock In to compute refined geometrical
parameters. They should bring new insights into the intimate structure of
firn and its evolution, and are also useful properties that can be used for
diffusion or permeability modeling.</p>
      <p id="d1e5061">We have chosen to plot these parameters as a function of density alone but
their evolution against depth can be obtained by fitting the data points in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> sums up and defines
these parameters: medium chord length (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a),
chamber-to-throat size ratio (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b), maximal path
diameter (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c), and connectivity index defined in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>d). The parameters
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a–c have been obtained by using the
commercial software GeoDict (<uri>https://www.math2market.de/</uri>, last access:
19 July 2018). Definitions of these parameters are given hereafter. Volumes
DC-C12 and LI-C12 were used, as the software requires parallelepiped ROIs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5086">Variations with density in <bold>(a)</bold> the medium chord length,
<bold>(b)</bold> the ratio of chamber size to throat size distribution at the
90th centile, <bold>(c)</bold> the maximal path diameter, and <bold>(d)</bold> the
connectivity index. The black dashed line is the average air isolation
density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">840</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.96"/> for
Dome C. Three-dimensional images illustrate each parameter on the left-hand
side in images A–D. Images A–C
come from the same DC-C12 volume at 85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of depth, while image D is a
picture of a 91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> deep volume. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diameter of the
sphere which is used for visualization of porosimetry and granulometry.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean of the maximum diameter for the
different percolation paths. The last column (I–IV) sketches the calculation
of parameters.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{height=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f09.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page2493?><p id="d1e5180">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a shows the medium chord length in all three
directions. The corresponding sketch only illustrates the intercepts in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction. The intercept lengths are measured and averaged for each
direction. For each density, the medium chord length can be considered
isotropic because no preferential direction can be determined. Both DC-C12
and LI-C12 depict a linear decrease of about 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from 22.33 to
100.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of depth for Dome C. For a given density, the medium chord
length of LI-C12 is always smaller than that of the DC-C12 volumes. This
confirms the more complex shape of pore morphology for Lock In as observed in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5209">As for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c, d), we note for Dome C a
slight discontinuity of the medium chord length decrease with density at
approximately 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At this density, the medium chord
length ceases to decrease. This discontinuity is difficult to interpret but
may be linked to the pinching of the thinnest channels that arises at the
start of the pore closure.</p>
      <p id="d1e5243">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b illustrates the ratio of the calculated
chamber to throat pore size distribution for the 90th centile. Chamber pore
size distribution is worked out using the granulometry over the whole sample,
and the throat pore size distribution is obtained here by porosimetry on all
sample faces, in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> directions.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>, images B and II clarify the throat and
chamber concepts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.97"/>. The porosimetry consists of the
introduction of a sphere from the top surface, thus mimicking the intrusion
of liquid from the specimen surface. Each tested size of spheres in the
sample is associated with the volume fraction covered by the set of spheres.
In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>II, this is represented by a light blue area
in which a particular sphere can circulate. When the space between pores is
too small the sphere cannot move down anymore. This is different from the
chamber pore size distribution, which is only based on the geometry of pores.
Spheres of different sizes are placed in every available space of the porous
network in that case. We chose to display the<?pagebreak page2494?> distribution at the 90th
centile, as the porosimetry is difficult to perform for a deep sample. This
provides the general trend in the closure of pores by pinching while still
having large globular parts. Error bars show the standard deviations from
the mean value of the porosimetry results on the six cubic faces. These are
shown only for Dome C. After the air isolation density, there is a drastic
increase in this ratio, as pinching reduces the throat size.</p>
      <p id="d1e5277">Percolation paths on subvolumes were calculated in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction alone.
They are evaluated by moving the largest possible sphere inside the pore
network, from the top surface to the bottom one. For each sample, 10
percolation paths were calculated, starting with a minimum path diameter of
24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then increasing it by 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> steps.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c shows the calculated maximal path
diameters. The vertical lines represent the variability based on all paths
that are different, and the dots are the mean of those maximum diameters.
A general decrease is observed, from approximately 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to zero (i.e., less than 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when reaching
approximately 830 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is slightly lower than the air
isolation density (840 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="altparen.98"/>). Again,
there are no noticeable differences between Dome C<?pagebreak page2495?> and Lock In. Both sites
exhibit a large variability in the maximal path diameter that can vary
between 0 and 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the same sample. However, these diameters
are quantitative information for the path of air (in a given interval). A
noticeable issue of this calculation is that the maximal path diameter
depends on the size of the chosen subvolume. Here a cube of 6.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
in size was used, which ensures percolation until 830 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
according to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>. The length of the path ranges from
8 to 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, meaning a tortuous structure whatever the depth. This is
shown in image A in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>. A larger cube would have
led to a drop in the maximum path diameter to 0 before 830 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
because of the structural isotropy of the pore network and the erratic
process of closure. A smaller porosity amount is associated with a smaller
probability of having a network connecting two opposite sample sides.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b, c do not allow for a clear differentiation
between the DC-C12 and LI-C12 samples.</p>
      <p id="d1e5450">It is instructive to compare the evolution of the connectivity index in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>d to that of the
chamber <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> throat and maximal path diameter
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b–c). The air isolation density obtained by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.99"/> for Dome C is well correlated to the end of the drop
of the connectivity index (black dashed line). It also correctly separates
the two regimes observed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b, c.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p id="d1e5471">Connectivity index for Dome C and Lock In. Vertical solid lines
represent the COD defined by the last firn air pumping depths in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Vertical dashed lines correspond to the air
isolation depth for temperature of Dome C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
Lock In (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) calculated with the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.100"/>
parameterization of the air-content-related close-off density, and using
the density profile with depth given in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. Black
dashed, dotted lines are linear slopes of the connectivity index obtained using a
least-square method.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f10.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e5533">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> compares the evolution of the connectivity
index with depth for Dome C and Lock In. When the connectivity index drops to
very small values, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> clearly shows a sharp change
in the slope for the two sites. As for Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>d, three
stages can be clearly distinguished with two horizontal parts and an abrupt
linear drop. The last two linear portions of the curve intersect at depths
that are in good agreement with both the ultimate depth at which air could be
sampled and with the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.101"/> parameterization of air isolation
depth related to air content data of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx44" id="text.102"/>.
The parameterization is used for temperatures of Dome C and Lock In.</p>
      <p id="d1e5548">Indeed, the blue and red solid lines correspond to the ultimate air pumping
depths at Dome C (99.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Lock In (108.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), whereas the blue and red dashed lines
correspond to the parameterization of the air isolation density related to
air content measurements, called close-off density in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.103"/>.
The air isolation depth was calculated from our measurements of density
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Using the connectivity index evolution thus seems a
promising method to locate the depth and density at which pores are nearly
fully closed. Its main advantage is that it does not depend on assumptions or
arbitrary choices on the status of pores (closed or open). According to
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, the end of the connectivity index drop down at
Lock In is approximately 8 m below the one of Dome C, consistent
with the difference in last firn air sampling depths between these sites.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p id="d1e5577">Comparison for the same density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">851</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
<bold>(a)</bold> Dome C and <bold>(b)</bold> Lock In microstructures as observed with
polarized light. Both thin sections are taken parallel to the core axis.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2481/2018/tc-12-2481-2018-f11.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e5621">Although exhibiting a size distribution, grain size measurements showed a
larger mean grain size at Dome C than at Lock In. Near the close-off depths
of Dome C (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Lock In (108 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), the mean
cross-sectional area was measured from thin sections to be approximately 1.78
and 0.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. We observed that grains in the Dome C
firn increased in size with depth (from 0.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
to 1.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) while grains in the Lock In firn
showed no clear increase in size in the probed depth range
(60–120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> compares two thin sections of firn from<?pagebreak page2496?> Dome C and Lock In for the same
density. This illustrates the
clear difference in grain size between these two sites. This information on
grain size, together with that on medium chord length
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) and surface-area-to-volume ratio
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>), suggest a more tortuous pore structure for Lock In.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Concluding remarks</title>
      <p id="d1e5705">X-ray characterization of firn samples was performed for two polar sites,
Dome C and Lock In, over a broad depth range. We focus on the microstructural
markers that accompany the closure of pores. The most obvious method to
characterize pore closure is to measure the ratio of closed to total
porosity. However, building on a thorough estimation of the results' accuracy
after imaging and processing, we have shown that this approach has serious
drawbacks as the percentage of closed porosity exhibits large variability
with sample size and voxel size and spatial heterogeneities when characterized
by X-ray tomography. This is problematic since most models of air transport
in the firn such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.104"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.105"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.106"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.107"/>
rely on a diffusion coefficient that requires the knowledge of the evolution
of the closed porosity with depth and/or density. Thus, these models depend
on a correct parameterization of the volume fraction of closed pores and
there is no consensus on those that have been proposed
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.108"/>.
The cut-pore effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.109"/> also has to be taken into account
on the boundaries of the sample.</p>
      <p id="d1e5727">Here, we have encountered similar difficulties in unambiguously determining
the fraction of closed pores. For example, we have determined that near the
critical density of 840 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it ranges from approximately
20 to 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This uncertainty results from the conjunction
of three detrimental effects: the sample size, the voxel size (resolution),
and an inherent spatial heterogeneity.</p>
      <p id="d1e5754">We propose an alternative parameter: the connectivity index, which is simply
the volume of the largest pore divided by the total pore volume. The main
advantage of the connectivity index is that it is much less sensitive to
cut pores that undermine the measure of the closed porosity ratio. Before the
close-off depth (COD), the connectivity index is essentially affected by
horizontal spatial heterogeneities in the sample but not much by resolution
and sample size. When focusing on the determination of the COD, we have shown
that a sample size on the order of 1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a reasonable choice
for the connectivity index determination. In these conditions, the
connectivity index accurately predicts the COD as defined by the ultimate air
sampling depth for the Dome C and Lock In sites. It also agrees with the
parameterization of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.110"/> related to the air content
measurements from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx44" id="text.111"/>. When using
tomographic data, we propose using the connectivity index to precisely determine
the COD.</p>
      <p id="d1e5774">That being said, the two sites studied in this work (Dome C and Lock In) are
both characterized by cold temperatures and low accumulation rates. It would
be interesting to use the connectivity index at other polar sites to confirm
its relevance for COD determination. Indeed, further challenging this index
at polar sites exhibiting layering such as WAIS Divide would help in
determining if this metric is appropriate to characterize closure.</p>
      <p id="d1e5778">In comparison to our work, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.112"/> took advantage of X-ray scans
on slices 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in height and of the full core diameter to determine
the status of subvolume pores (closed or opened).
Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> discussed the effects of the voxel size by
comparing results from samples using 12 and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The difference
for the closed porosity ratio was less than 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, results
obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.113"/> with a voxel size of 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should
not be too vitiated by voxel-related errors. However, their definition
of a closed pore still necessitates the knowledge of the status of the
surrounding pores. This requires having access to larger volumes than those
studied. In our work, only three samples have the diameter of the core.
In addition, as detailed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, the voxel size of
the largest samples has a great influence on the fraction of closed pores.
The large samples and voxel size used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.114"/> seem
appropriate to reasonably limit cut-pore effect without suffering too much
from voxel size issues. However, it is still hindered by the unavoidable
possibility of having a large closed pore (larger than the sample) that is
wrongly considered open. The use of the connectivity index avoids these
issues.</p>
      <p id="d1e5829">The morphology of pores was compared to data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.115"/> for
polar sites WAIS Divide and Megadunes. Their data show more variability than ours, which can be
explained by the selection of finely and coarsely grained
layers and the different nature of
the studied sites. Indeed, Dome C and Lock In are very cold sites with low
accumulation, with Dome C at the tip of the dome. In contrast, Megadunes
is a site exposed to strong winds
that redeposit snow from one side of the dune to the other, thus leading to a
non-steady-state site. WAIS Divide is a warmer site with a high accumulation
rate. Layering is significant, and high-density layers of fine grains can
be found above low-density layers of coarse grains. As <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.116"/>
intentionally extracted samples both from coarsely and finely grained
layers, and plotted their data
indiscriminately with bulk density, these led to more dispersed results.
Using a local density (density of the scanned sample rather than the density
of the whole sample) as done here could have reduced the dispersion of
their results as discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.117"/>. Such a strategy could
have helped confirm or reject that close-off occurs at a critical density as
suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.118"/>, while current inaccurate estimations do
not allow such a claim. Again, we believe that the connectivity index would
clearly answer this question and would<?pagebreak page2497?> discriminate the role of the density
and of the microstructure on closure if all curves fall on a master curve.</p>
      <p id="d1e5844">The polar sites Dome C and Lock In were extensively compared. Shapes of
pores, closed porosity, and connectivity indices likewise evolve with
density. However, the closure of pores occurs deeper for Lock In than for
Dome C (by 8 m). Our results on the medium chord length, the
surface-area-to-volume ratio, and grain size suggest a more tortuous firn at
Lock In than at Dome C. This could have interesting implications for air
diffusivity in the firn at these two sites. If Lock In is more tortuous,
older air samples should be retrieved from firn air pumping.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability">

      <p id="d1e5851">Numerical codes for image analysis were developed using
the free software Fiji <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.119"/> and available plug-ins
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.120"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> as well as Python 3.5 libraries.
All of them can be provided upon request.</p>

      <p id="d1e5862">All the tomographic data plotted in the figures are available at the research
data center PerSCiDO of Université Grenoble Alpes and are citable through
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18709/PERSCIDO.2018.07.DS225" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18709/PERSCIDO.2018.07.DS225</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.121"/>. Raw <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>3-D<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> images
analyzed in the present work are also available upon request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e5878">AB, CB, PL, and AP carried out the X-ray scans.
The cold cell was designed at IGE. Machining of samples and image processing
and property calculations were performed by CB and AB. PM coordinated the
recent Lock In drilling program and contributed to the field work. AP and CLM
directed the project. All authors contributed to the interpretation of
results and to the writing of the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e5884">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5890">We warmly thank Xavier Faïn for his help in cutting slices of the Lock In ice core. Edward Ando from the 3SR laboratory and Mathieu Bourcier are
thanked for providing help during scans. Christophe Frau is thanked for
machining the cold cell and Gregory Teste for providing an air dryer. We are
grateful to Amaëlle Landais and Anais Orsi for providing the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-related lock-in depths for Dome C and Lock In. We also
thank the field personnel at Dome Concordia who retrieved the ice cores for
the VOLSOL project: Joel Savarino, Philippe Possenti, and those who wintered the
Concordia station. Field personnel at the Lock In site are also
thanked (Jérôme Chappellaz, David Colin, Philippe Dordhain,
Philippe Possenti). Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) via contract
NT09-431976-VOLSOL is acknowledged for the financial support for acquiring
the ice core sections at Dome Concordia. This work relies on the lock-in ice
core drilling and scientific program funded by IPEV program No1153 and CNRS
INSU/LEFE program NEVE-CLIMAT. Philippe Possenti is also thanked for
performing the DC12 drilling. Financial support for DC12 comes from the
French ANR programs RPD COCLICO (ANR-10-RPDOC-002-01). The Institute Polaire
Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV) supported the research and polar logistics through
the program GLACIOLOGIE no. 902. Labex OSUG@2020 and CEMAM are thanked for
financial support for the microcomputed tomograph. Finally, we thank Ian
Baker and Johannes Freitag for their helpful review of this
paper.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Olaf Eisen<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Johannes Freitag and Ian Baker</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Anderson and Benson(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, D. L. and Benson, C. S.: The densification and diagenesis of
snow, in: Ice and snow: properties, processes, and applications, edited by:
Kingery, W., chap. 30, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 391–411, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Augustin et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Augustin, L., Barbante, C., and Barnes, P.: Eight glacial cycles from an
Antarctic ice core, Nature, 429, 623–628, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Babin et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Babin, P., Valle, G. D., Chiron, H., Cloetens, P., and Hoszowska, J.: Fast
X-ray tomography analysis of bubble growth and foam setting during
breadmaking, J. Cereal Sci., 43, 393–397, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2005.12.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jcs.2005.12.002</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Babout et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Babout, L., Marrow, T. J., Mummery, P. M., and Withers, P. J.: Mapping the
evolution of density in 3D of thermally oxidised graphite for nuclear
applications, Scripta Mater., 54, 829–834,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.028</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Barnola et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Barnola, J., Pierritz, R., Goujon, C., Duval, P., and Boller, E.: 3D
reconstruction of the Vostok firn structure by X-ray tomography, Mater.
Glyatsiol. Issled./Data Glaciol. Stud, 97, 80–84, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Barnola et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Barnola, J.-M., Pimienta, P., Raynaud, D., and Korotkevich, Y. S.:
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-climate relationship as deduced from the Vostok ice core: a
re-examination based on new measurements and on a re-evaluation of the air
dating, Tellus B, 43, 83–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1991.t01-1-00002.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0889.1991.t01-1-00002.x</ext-link>,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Battle et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Battle, M., Bender, M. L., Sowers, T., Tans, P. P., Butler, J., Elkins, J.,
Ellis, J., Conway, T. J., Zhang, N., Lang, P., and Clarke, A.: Atmospheric
gas concentrations over the past century measured in air from firn at the
South Pole, Nature, 383, 6597, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/383231a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/383231a0</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Battle et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Battle, M. O., Severinghaus, J. P., Sofen, E. D., Plotkin, D., Orsi, A. J.,
Aydin, M., Montzka, S. A., Sowers, T., and Tans, P. P.: Controls on the
movement and composition of firn air at the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Divide,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11007–11021,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11007-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11007-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bazin et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Bazin, L., Landais, A., Lemieux-Dudon, B., Toyé Mahamadou Kele, H.,
Veres, D., Parrenin, F., Martinerie, P., Ritz, C., Capron, E., Lipenkov, V.,
Loutre, M.-F., Raynaud, D., Vinther, B., Svensson, A., Rasmussen, S. O.,
Severi, M., Blunier, T., Leuenberger, M., Fischer, H., Masson-Delmotte, V.,
Chappellaz, J., and Wolff, E.: An optimized multi-proxy, multi-site Antarctic
ice and gas orbital chronology (AICC2012): 120–800 ka, Clim. Past, 9,
1715–1731, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1715-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-9-1715-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Boulos et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Boulos, V., Fristot, V., Houzet, D., Salvo, L., and Lhuissier, P.:
Investigating performance variations of an optimized GPU-ported granulometry
algorithm To cite this version : Investigating performance variations of an
optimized GPU-ported granulometry algorithm, 2012 Conference on Design and
Architectures for<?pagebreak page2498?> Signal and Image Processing (DASIP), Karlsruhe, Germany,
October 2012, 1–6, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Bréant et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Bréant, C., Martinerie, P., Orsi, A., Arnaud, L., and Landais, A.:
Modelling firn thickness evolution during the last deglaciation: constraints
on sensitivity to temperature and impurities, Clim. Past, 13, 833–853,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-833-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-13-833-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Buizert et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Buizert, C., Martinerie, P., Petrenko, V. V., Severinghaus, J. P., Trudinger,
C. M., Witrant, E., Rosen, J. L., Orsi, A. J., Rubino, M., Etheridge, D. M.,
Steele, L. P., Hogan, C., Laube, J. C., Sturges, W. T., Levchenko, V. A.,
Smith, A. M., Levin, I., Conway, T. J., Dlugokencky, E. J., Lang, P. M.,
Kawamura, K., Jenk, T. M., White, J. W. C., Sowers, T., Schwander, J., and
Blunier, T.: Gas transport in firn: multiple-tracer characterisation and
model intercomparison for NEEM, Northern Greenland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
4259–4277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4259-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4259-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Burr et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Burr, A., Ballot, C., Lhuissier, P., Martinerie, P., Martin, C. L., Philip,
A.: Physical and morphological parameters of two Antarctic polar sites: Dome
C and Lock In, Perscido – Université Grenoble Alpes Data set,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18709/PERSCIDO.2018.07.DS225" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18709/PERSCIDO.2018.07.DS225</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Coléou et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Coléou, C., Lesaffre, B., Brzoska, J. B., Ludwig, W., and Boller, E.:
Three-dimensional snow images by X-ray microtomography, Ann. Glaciol., 32,
75–81, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756401781819418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756401781819418</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Courville et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Courville, Z., Hörhold, M., Hopkins, M., and Albert, M.:
Lattice-Boltzmann modeling of the air permeability of polar firn, J.
Geophys. Res.-Earth, 115, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001549" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JF001549</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Courville et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Courville, Z. R., Albert, M. R., Fahnestock, M. A., Cathles, I. M., and
Shuman, C. A.: Impacts of an accumulation hiatus on the physical properties
of firn at a low-accumulation polar site, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 112,
1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000429" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JF000429</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Domine et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Domine, F., Albert, M., Huthwelker, T., Jacobi, H.-W., Kokhanovsky, A. A.,
Lehning, M., Picard, G., and Simpson, W. R.: Snow physics as relevant to snow
photochemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 171–208,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-171-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-171-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Doube et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Doube, M., Kłosowski, M. M., Arganda-Carreras, I., Cordelières, F. P.,
Dougherty, R. P., Jackson, J. S., Schmid, B., Hutchinson, J. R., and
Shefelbine, S. J.: BoneJ: free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ,
Bone, 47, 1076–1079, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Fabre et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Fabre, A., Barnola, J. M., Arnaud, L., and Chappellaz, J.: Determination of
gas diffusivity in polar firn: Comparison between experimental measurements
and inverse modeling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 557–560,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010780" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL010780</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Flin et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Flin, F., Brzoska, J.-B., Lesaffre, B., Coléou, C., and Pieritz, R. A.:
Full three-dimensional modelling of curvature-dependent snow metamorphism:
first results and comparison with experimental tomographic data, J. Phys. D
Appl. Phys., 36, 49–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/36/10A/310" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0022-3727/36/10A/310</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Fourteau et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Fourteau, K., Faïn, X., Martinerie, P., Landais, A., Ekaykin, A. A.,
Lipenkov, V. Ya., and Chappellaz, J.: Analytical constraints on layered gas
trapping and smoothing of atmospheric variability in ice under
low-accumulation conditions, Clim. Past, 13, 1815–1830,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1815-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-13-1815-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Freitag et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Freitag, J., Dobrindt, U., and Kipfstuhl, J.: A new method for predicting
transport properties of polar firn with respect to gases on the pore-space
scale, Ann. Glaciol., 35, 538–544, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Freitag et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Freitag, J., Wilhelms, F., and Kipfstuhl, S.: Microstructure-dependent
densification of polar firn derived from X-ray microtomography, J. Glaciol.,
50, 243–250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756504781830123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756504781830123</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Freitag et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Freitag, J., Kipfstuhl, S., Laepple, T., and Wilhelms, F.:
Impurity-controlled densification: A new model for stratified polar firn,
J. Glaciol., 59, 1163–1169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG13J042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2013JoG13J042</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Freitag et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Freitag, J., Kipfstuhl, S., and Laepple, T.: Core-scale radioscopic imaging:
a new method reveals density – calcium link in Antarctic firn, J. Glaciol.,
59, 1009–1014, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG13J028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2013JoG13J028</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Fujita et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Fujita, S., Okuyama, J., Hori, A., and Hondoh, T.: Metamorphism of
stratified firn at Dome Fuji, Antarctica: A mechanism for local insolation
modulation of gas transport conditions during bubble close off, J. Geophys.
Res., 114, 1–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001143" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JF001143</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Gautier et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Gautier, E., Savarino, J., Erbland, J., Lanciki, A., and Possenti, P.:
Variability of sulfate signal in ice core records based on five replicate
cores, Clim. Past, 12, 103–113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-103-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-103-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Goujon et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Goujon, C., Barnola, J.-M., and Ritz, C.: Modeling the densification of
polar firn including heat diffusion: Application to close-off characteristics
and gas isotopic fractionation for Antarctica and Greenland sites, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003319" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003319</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Gregory et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Gregory, S. A., Albert, M. R., and Baker, I.: Impact of physical properties
and accumulation rate on pore close-off in layered firn, The Cryosphere, 8,
91–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-91-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-91-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Hildebrand and Rüegsegger(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Hildebrand, T. and Rüegsegger, P.: A new method for the
model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images, J.
Microsc.-Oxford, 185, 67–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.1340694.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.1340694.x</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Hörhold et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Hörhold, M. W., Kipfstuhl, S., Wilhelms, F., Freitag, J., and Frenzel,
A.: The densification of layered polar firn, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 116,
1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001630" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JF001630</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Hörhold et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Hörhold, M. W., Laepple, T., Freitag, J., Bigler, M., Fischer, H., and
Kipfstuhl, S.: On the impact of impurities on the densification of polar
firn, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 325–326, 93–99,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.022</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Kaempfer and Schneebeli(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Kaempfer, T. U. and Schneebeli, M.: Observation of isothermal metamorphism
of new snow and interpretation as a sintering process, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D24101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009047</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Landais et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Landais, A., Barnola, J. M., Kawamura, K., Caillon, N., Delmotte, M., Van
Ommen, T., Dreyfus, G., Jouzel, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Minster, B.,
Freitag, J., Leuenberger, M., Schwander, J., Huber, C., Etheridge, D., and
Morgan, V.: Firn-air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>15N in modern polar sites and
glacial-interglacial ice: A model-data mismatch during glacial periods in
Antarctica?, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 25, 49–62,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.06.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.06.007</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2499?><ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Landais et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Landais, A., Dreyfus, G., Capron, E., Jouzel, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Roche,
D. M., Prié, F., Caillon, N., Chappellaz, J., Leuenberger, M.,
Lourantou, A., Parrenin, F., Raynaud, D., and Teste, G.: Two-phase change in
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Antarctic temperature and global climate during Termination II, Nat.
Geosci., 6, 1062–1065, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1985" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1985</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Leduc-Leballeur et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Leduc-Leballeur, M., Picard, G., Mialon, A., Arnaud, L., Lefebvre, E.,
Possenti, P., and Kerr, Y.: Modeling L-band brightness temperature at Dome C
in Antarctica and comparison with SMOS observations, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote
Sens., 53, 4022–4032, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Linow et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Linow, S., Hörhold, M. W., and Freitag, J.: Grain-size evolution of
polar firn: a new empirical grain growth parameterization based on X-ray
microcomputer tomography measurements, J. Glaciol., 58, 1245–1252,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J256" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2012JoG11J256</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Lomonaco et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Lomonaco, R., Albert, M., and Baker, I.: Microstructural evolution of
fine-grained layers through the firn column at Summit, Greenland, J.
Glaciol., 57, 755–762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311797409730" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/002214311797409730</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Lorensen and Cline(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorensen, W. E. and Cline, H. E.: Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D
surface construction algorithm, SIGGRAPH '87 Proceedings of the 14th annual conference
on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, New York, 21,
163–169, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Maeno and Ebinuma(1983)</label><mixed-citation>Maeno, N. and Ebinuma, T.: Pressure Sintering of Ice and Its Implication to
the Densification of Snow at Polar Glaciers and Ice Sheets, J. Phys. Chem.,
169, 4103–4110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100244a023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/j100244a023</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Martin et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Martin, C. F., Josserond, C., Salvo, L., Blandin, J. J., Cloetens, P., and
Boller, E.: Characterization by X-ray micro-tomography of cavity coalescence
during superplastic deformation, Scripta Mater., 42, 375–381,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00355-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00355-3</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Martinerie et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Martinerie, P., Lipenkov, V. Y., and Raynaud, D.: Correction od air-content
measurements in polar ice for the effect of cut bubbles at the surface of the
sample, J. Glaciol., 36, 299–303, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Martinerie et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Martinerie, P., Raynaud, D., Etheridge, D. M., Barnola, J. M., and Mazaudier,
D.: Physical and climatic parameters which influence the air content in
polar ice, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 112, 1–13,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(92)90002-D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821X(92)90002-D</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Martinerie et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Martinerie, P., Lipenkov, V. Y., Raynaud, D., Chappellaz, J., and Lorius, C.:
Air content paleo record in the Vostok ice core (Antarctica): A mixed record
of climatic and glaciological parameters, J. Geophys. Res., 99,
10565–10576, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Mitchell et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Mitchell, L. E., Buizert, C., Brook, E. J., Breton, D. J., Fegyveresi, J.,
Baggenstos, D., Orsi, A., Severinghaus, J., Alley, R. B., Albert, M., Rhodes,
R. H., McConnell, J. R., Sigl, M., Maselli, O., Gregory, S., and Ahn, J.:
Observing and modeling the influence of layering on bubble trapping in polar
firn, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 2558–2574, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022766" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022766</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Raynaud et al.(1982)</label><mixed-citation>Raynaud, D., Delmas, R., Ascencio, J. M., and Legrand, M.: Gas extraction
from polar ice cores: a critical issue for studying the evolution of
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and ice-sheet surface elevation, Ann. Glaciol., 3,
265–268, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Rhodes et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Rhodes, R. H., Faïn, X., Brook, E. J., McConnell, J. R., Maselli, O. J.,
Sigl, M., Edwards, J., Buizert, C., Blunier, T., Chappellaz, J., and Freitag,
J.: Local artifacts in ice core methane records caused by layered bubble
trapping and in situ production: a multi-site investigation, Clim. Past, 12,
1061–1077, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1061-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-1061-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Rolland du Roscoat et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Rolland du Roscoat, S., Decain, M., Thibault, X., Geindreau, C., and Bloch,
J. F.: Estimation of microstructural properties from synchrotron X-ray
microtomography and determination of the REV in paper materials, Acta
Mater., 55, 2841–2850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.050" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.050</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Salmon et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Salmon, P. L., Ohlsson, C., Shefelbine, S. J., and Doube, M.: Structure
model index does not measure rods and plates in trabecular bone,
Front.Endocrinol., 6, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00162" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fendo.2015.00162</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Schaller et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Schaller, C. F., Freitag, J., and Eisen, O.: Critical porosity of gas
enclosure in polar firn independent of climate, Clim. Past, 13, 1685–1693,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1685-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-13-1685-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Schindelin et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M.,
Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., Tinevez,
J. Y., White, D. J., hartenstein, V., Eliceiri, K., Tomanacak, P., and
Cardona, A.: Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis,
Nat. Methods, 9, 676–682, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Schneebeli and Sokratov(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Schneebeli, M. and Sokratov, S. A.: Tomography of temperature gradient
metamorphism of snow and associated changes in heat conductivity, Hydrol.
Proc., 18, 3655–3665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5800" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.5800</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Schwander(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwander, J.: The Transformation of Snow to Ice and the Occlusion of
Gases, in: The Environmental Record in Glaciers and Ice Sheets, John Wiley,
New York, 53–67, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Schwander and Stauffer(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Schwander, J. and Stauffer, B.: Age difference between polar ice and the air
trapped in its bubbles, Nature, 311, 45–47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/311045a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/311045a0</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Schwander et al.(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwander, J., Stauffer, B., and Sigg, A.: Air mixing in firn and the age of
the air at pore close-off, Ann. Glaciol., 10, 141–145, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Schwander et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Schwander, J., Barnola, J.-M., Andrié, C., Leuenberger, M., Ludin, A.,
Raynaud, D., and Stauffer, B.: The age of the air in the firn and the ice at
Summit, Greenland, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 2831–2838,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JD02383</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Scott and Kilgour(1969)</label><mixed-citation>
Scott, G. D. and Kilgour, D. M.: The density of random close packing of
spheres, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 2, 863–866, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Severinghaus and Battle(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Severinghaus, J. P. and Battle, M. O.: Fractionation of gases in polar ice
during bubble close-off: New constraints from firn air Ne, Kr and Xe
observations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 244, 474–500,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.032</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Severinghaus et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Severinghaus, J. P., Albert, M. R., Courville, Z. R., Fahnestock, M. A.,
Kawamura, K., Montzka, S. A., Mühle, J., Scambos, T. A., Shields, E.,
Shuman, C. A., Suwa, M., Tans, P., and Weiss, R. F.: Deep air convection in
the firn at a zero-accumulation site, central Antarctica, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 293, 359–367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.03.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2010.03.003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Sowers et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Sowers, T., Bender, M., Raynaud, D., and Korotkevich, Y.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of
N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in air trapped in polar ice: A tracer of gas transport in the firn and
a possible constraint on ice age-gas age differences, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 97, 15683–15697, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Stauffer et al.(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Stauffer, B., Schwander, J., and Oeschger, H.: Enclosure of air during
metamorphosis of dry firn to ice, Ann. Glaciol., 6, 108–112,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/1985AoG6-1-108-112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/1985AoG6-1-108-112</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Sturges et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Sturges, W., McIntyre, H., Penkett, S., Chappellaz, J., Barnola, J.-M.,
Mulvaney, R., Atlas, E., and Stroud, V.: Methyl bromide, other brominated
methanes, and methyl iodide in polar firn air, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
1595–1606, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Sweeney and Martin(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Sweeney, S. M. and Martin, C. L.: Pore size distributions calculated from
3-D images of DEM-simulated powder compacts, Acta Mater., 51, 3635–3639,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00183-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00183-6</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2500?><ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Trudinger et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Trudinger, C. M., Enting, I. G., Etheridge, D. M., Francey, R., Levchenko,
V. A., and Steele, L. P.: Modeling air movement and bubble trapping in
firn, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 6747–6763, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Trudinger et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Trudinger, C. M., Enting, I. G., Rayner, P. J., Etheridge, D. M., Buizert,
C., Rubino, M., Krummel, P. B., and Blunier, T.: How well do different
tracers constrain the firn diffusivity profile?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
1485–1510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1485-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1485-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Veres et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Veres, D., Bazin, L., Landais, A., Toyé Mahamadou Kele, H.,
Lemieux-Dudon, B., Parrenin, F., Martinerie, P., Blayo, E., Blunier, T.,
Capron, E., Chappellaz, J., Rasmussen, S. O., Severi, M., Svensson, A.,
Vinther, B., and Wolff, E. W.: The Antarctic ice core chronology (AICC2012):
an optimized multi-parameter and multi-site dating approach for the last 120
thousand years, Clim. Past, 9, 1733–1748,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1733-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-9-1733-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Verfaillie et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Verfaillie, D., Fily, M., Le Meur, E., Magand, O., Jourdain, B., Arnaud, L.,
and Favier, V.: Snow accumulation variability derived from radar and firn
core data along a 600 km transect in Adelie Land, East Antarctic plateau,
The Cryosphere, 6, 1345–1358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-1345-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-6-1345-2012</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Wautier et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Wautier, A., Geindreau, C., and Flin, F.: Linking snow microstructure to its
macroscopic elastic stiffness tensor: A numerical homogenization method and
its application to 3-D images from X-ray tomography, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 8031–8041, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL065227</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Witrant et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Witrant, E., Martinerie, P., Hogan, C., Laube, J. C., Kawamura, K., Capron,
E., Montzka, S. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etheridge, D., Blunier, T., and
Sturges, W. T.: A new multi-gas constrained model of trace gas
non-homogeneous transport in firn: evaluation and behaviour at eleven polar
sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11465–11483,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11465-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11465-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Pore morphology of polar firn around closure revealed by X-ray tomography</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Understanding the slow densification process of polar firn into ice is
essential in order to constrain the age difference between the ice matrix and
entrapped gases. The progressive microstructure evolution of the firn column
with depth leads to pore closure and gas entrapment. Air transport models in
the firn usually include a closed porosity profile based on available data.
Pycnometry or melting–refreezing techniques have been used to obtain the
ratio of closed to total porosity and air content in closed pores,
respectively. X-ray-computed tomography is complementary to these methods, as
it enables one to obtain the full pore network in 3-D. This study takes
advantage of this nondestructive technique to discuss the morphological
evolution of pores on four different Antarctic sites. The computation of
refined geometrical parameters for the very cold polar sites Dome C and
Lock In (the two Antarctic plateau sites studied here) provides new
information that could be used in further studies. The comparison of these
two sites shows a more tortuous pore network at Lock In than at Dome C, which
should result in older gas ages in deep firn at Lock In. A comprehensive
estimation of the different errors related to X-ray tomography and to the
sample variability has been performed. The procedure described here may be
used as a guideline for further experimental characterization of firn
samples. We show that the closed-to-total porosity ratio, which is
classically used for the detection of pore closure, is strongly affected by
the sample size, the image reconstruction, and spatial heterogeneities. In
this work, we introduce an alternative parameter, the connectivity index,
which is practically independent of sample size and image acquisition
conditions, and that accurately predicts the close-off depth and density. Its
strength also lies in its simple computation, without any assumption of the
pore status (open or close). The close-off prediction is obtained for Dome C
and Lock In, without any further numerical simulations on
images (e.g., by permeability or
diffusivity calculations).</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Anderson and Benson(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, D. L. and Benson, C. S.: The densification and diagenesis of
snow, in: Ice and snow: properties, processes, and applications, edited by:
Kingery, W., chap. 30, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 391–411, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Augustin et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Augustin, L., Barbante, C., and Barnes, P.: Eight glacial cycles from an
Antarctic ice core, Nature, 429, 623–628, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Babin et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Babin, P., Valle, G. D., Chiron, H., Cloetens, P., and Hoszowska, J.: Fast
X-ray tomography analysis of bubble growth and foam setting during
breadmaking, J. Cereal Sci., 43, 393–397, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2005.12.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2005.12.002</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Babout et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Babout, L., Marrow, T. J., Mummery, P. M., and Withers, P. J.: Mapping the
evolution of density in 3D of thermally oxidised graphite for nuclear
applications, Scripta Mater., 54, 829–834,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.028</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Barnola et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Barnola, J., Pierritz, R., Goujon, C., Duval, P., and Boller, E.: 3D
reconstruction of the Vostok firn structure by X-ray tomography, Mater.
Glyatsiol. Issled./Data Glaciol. Stud, 97, 80–84, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Barnola et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Barnola, J.-M., Pimienta, P., Raynaud, D., and Korotkevich, Y. S.:
CO<sub>2</sub>-climate relationship as deduced from the Vostok ice core: a
re-examination based on new measurements and on a re-evaluation of the air
dating, Tellus B, 43, 83–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1991.t01-1-00002.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1991.t01-1-00002.x</a>,
1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Battle et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Battle, M., Bender, M. L., Sowers, T., Tans, P. P., Butler, J., Elkins, J.,
Ellis, J., Conway, T. J., Zhang, N., Lang, P., and Clarke, A.: Atmospheric
gas concentrations over the past century measured in air from firn at the
South Pole, Nature, 383, 6597, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/383231a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/383231a0</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Battle et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Battle, M. O., Severinghaus, J. P., Sofen, E. D., Plotkin, D., Orsi, A. J.,
Aydin, M., Montzka, S. A., Sowers, T., and Tans, P. P.: Controls on the
movement and composition of firn air at the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Divide,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11007–11021,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11007-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11007-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bazin et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Bazin, L., Landais, A., Lemieux-Dudon, B., Toyé Mahamadou Kele, H.,
Veres, D., Parrenin, F., Martinerie, P., Ritz, C., Capron, E., Lipenkov, V.,
Loutre, M.-F., Raynaud, D., Vinther, B., Svensson, A., Rasmussen, S. O.,
Severi, M., Blunier, T., Leuenberger, M., Fischer, H., Masson-Delmotte, V.,
Chappellaz, J., and Wolff, E.: An optimized multi-proxy, multi-site Antarctic
ice and gas orbital chronology (AICC2012): 120–800&thinsp;ka, Clim. Past, 9,
1715–1731, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1715-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1715-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Boulos et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Boulos, V., Fristot, V., Houzet, D., Salvo, L., and Lhuissier, P.:
Investigating performance variations of an optimized GPU-ported granulometry
algorithm To cite this version : Investigating performance variations of an
optimized GPU-ported granulometry algorithm, 2012 Conference on Design and
Architectures for Signal and Image Processing (DASIP), Karlsruhe, Germany,
October 2012, 1–6, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Bréant et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Bréant, C., Martinerie, P., Orsi, A., Arnaud, L., and Landais, A.:
Modelling firn thickness evolution during the last deglaciation: constraints
on sensitivity to temperature and impurities, Clim. Past, 13, 833–853,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-833-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-833-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Buizert et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Buizert, C., Martinerie, P., Petrenko, V. V., Severinghaus, J. P., Trudinger,
C. M., Witrant, E., Rosen, J. L., Orsi, A. J., Rubino, M., Etheridge, D. M.,
Steele, L. P., Hogan, C., Laube, J. C., Sturges, W. T., Levchenko, V. A.,
Smith, A. M., Levin, I., Conway, T. J., Dlugokencky, E. J., Lang, P. M.,
Kawamura, K., Jenk, T. M., White, J. W. C., Sowers, T., Schwander, J., and
Blunier, T.: Gas transport in firn: multiple-tracer characterisation and
model intercomparison for NEEM, Northern Greenland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
4259–4277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4259-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4259-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Burr et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Burr, A., Ballot, C., Lhuissier, P., Martinerie, P., Martin, C. L., Philip,
A.: Physical and morphological parameters of two Antarctic polar sites: Dome
C and Lock In, Perscido – Université Grenoble Alpes Data set,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18709/PERSCIDO.2018.07.DS225" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18709/PERSCIDO.2018.07.DS225</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Coléou et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Coléou, C., Lesaffre, B., Brzoska, J. B., Ludwig, W., and Boller, E.:
Three-dimensional snow images by X-ray microtomography, Ann. Glaciol., 32,
75–81, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756401781819418" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756401781819418</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Courville et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Courville, Z., Hörhold, M., Hopkins, M., and Albert, M.:
Lattice-Boltzmann modeling of the air permeability of polar firn, J.
Geophys. Res.-Earth, 115, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001549" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001549</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Courville et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Courville, Z. R., Albert, M. R., Fahnestock, M. A., Cathles, I. M., and
Shuman, C. A.: Impacts of an accumulation hiatus on the physical properties
of firn at a low-accumulation polar site, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 112,
1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000429" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000429</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Domine et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Domine, F., Albert, M., Huthwelker, T., Jacobi, H.-W., Kokhanovsky, A. A.,
Lehning, M., Picard, G., and Simpson, W. R.: Snow physics as relevant to snow
photochemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 171–208,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-171-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-171-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Doube et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Doube, M., Kłosowski, M. M., Arganda-Carreras, I., Cordelières, F. P.,
Dougherty, R. P., Jackson, J. S., Schmid, B., Hutchinson, J. R., and
Shefelbine, S. J.: BoneJ: free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ,
Bone, 47, 1076–1079, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fabre et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Fabre, A., Barnola, J. M., Arnaud, L., and Chappellaz, J.: Determination of
gas diffusivity in polar firn: Comparison between experimental measurements
and inverse modeling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 557–560,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010780" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010780</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Flin et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Flin, F., Brzoska, J.-B., Lesaffre, B., Coléou, C., and Pieritz, R. A.:
Full three-dimensional modelling of curvature-dependent snow metamorphism:
first results and comparison with experimental tomographic data, J. Phys. D
Appl. Phys., 36, 49–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/36/10A/310" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/36/10A/310</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Fourteau et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Fourteau, K., Faïn, X., Martinerie, P., Landais, A., Ekaykin, A. A.,
Lipenkov, V. Ya., and Chappellaz, J.: Analytical constraints on layered gas
trapping and smoothing of atmospheric variability in ice under
low-accumulation conditions, Clim. Past, 13, 1815–1830,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1815-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1815-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Freitag et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Freitag, J., Dobrindt, U., and Kipfstuhl, J.: A new method for predicting
transport properties of polar firn with respect to gases on the pore-space
scale, Ann. Glaciol., 35, 538–544, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Freitag et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Freitag, J., Wilhelms, F., and Kipfstuhl, S.: Microstructure-dependent
densification of polar firn derived from X-ray microtomography, J. Glaciol.,
50, 243–250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756504781830123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756504781830123</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Freitag et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Freitag, J., Kipfstuhl, S., Laepple, T., and Wilhelms, F.:
Impurity-controlled densification: A new model for stratified polar firn,
J. Glaciol., 59, 1163–1169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG13J042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG13J042</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Freitag et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Freitag, J., Kipfstuhl, S., and Laepple, T.: Core-scale radioscopic imaging:
a new method reveals density – calcium link in Antarctic firn, J. Glaciol.,
59, 1009–1014, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG13J028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG13J028</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Fujita et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Fujita, S., Okuyama, J., Hori, A., and Hondoh, T.: Metamorphism of
stratified firn at Dome Fuji, Antarctica: A mechanism for local insolation
modulation of gas transport conditions during bubble close off, J. Geophys.
Res., 114, 1–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001143" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001143</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Gautier et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Gautier, E., Savarino, J., Erbland, J., Lanciki, A., and Possenti, P.:
Variability of sulfate signal in ice core records based on five replicate
cores, Clim. Past, 12, 103–113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-103-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-103-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Goujon et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Goujon, C., Barnola, J.-M., and Ritz, C.: Modeling the densification of
polar firn including heat diffusion: Application to close-off characteristics
and gas isotopic fractionation for Antarctica and Greenland sites, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003319" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003319</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Gregory et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Gregory, S. A., Albert, M. R., and Baker, I.: Impact of physical properties
and accumulation rate on pore close-off in layered firn, The Cryosphere, 8,
91–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-91-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-91-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Hildebrand and Rüegsegger(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Hildebrand, T. and Rüegsegger, P.: A new method for the
model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images, J.
Microsc.-Oxford, 185, 67–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.1340694.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.1340694.x</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Hörhold et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Hörhold, M. W., Kipfstuhl, S., Wilhelms, F., Freitag, J., and Frenzel,
A.: The densification of layered polar firn, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 116,
1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001630" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001630</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Hörhold et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Hörhold, M. W., Laepple, T., Freitag, J., Bigler, M., Fischer, H., and
Kipfstuhl, S.: On the impact of impurities on the densification of polar
firn, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 325–326, 93–99,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.022</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Kaempfer and Schneebeli(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Kaempfer, T. U. and Schneebeli, M.: Observation of isothermal metamorphism
of new snow and interpretation as a sintering process, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D24101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009047</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Landais et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Landais, A., Barnola, J. M., Kawamura, K., Caillon, N., Delmotte, M., Van
Ommen, T., Dreyfus, G., Jouzel, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Minster, B.,
Freitag, J., Leuenberger, M., Schwander, J., Huber, C., Etheridge, D., and
Morgan, V.: Firn-air <i>δ</i>15N in modern polar sites and
glacial-interglacial ice: A model-data mismatch during glacial periods in
Antarctica?, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 25, 49–62,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.06.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.06.007</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Landais et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Landais, A., Dreyfus, G., Capron, E., Jouzel, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Roche,
D. M., Prié, F., Caillon, N., Chappellaz, J., Leuenberger, M.,
Lourantou, A., Parrenin, F., Raynaud, D., and Teste, G.: Two-phase change in
CO<sub>2</sub>, Antarctic temperature and global climate during Termination II, Nat.
Geosci., 6, 1062–1065, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1985" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1985</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Leduc-Leballeur et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Leduc-Leballeur, M., Picard, G., Mialon, A., Arnaud, L., Lefebvre, E.,
Possenti, P., and Kerr, Y.: Modeling L-band brightness temperature at Dome C
in Antarctica and comparison with SMOS observations, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote
Sens., 53, 4022–4032, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Linow et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Linow, S., Hörhold, M. W., and Freitag, J.: Grain-size evolution of
polar firn: a new empirical grain growth parameterization based on X-ray
microcomputer tomography measurements, J. Glaciol., 58, 1245–1252,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J256" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J256</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Lomonaco et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Lomonaco, R., Albert, M., and Baker, I.: Microstructural evolution of
fine-grained layers through the firn column at Summit, Greenland, J.
Glaciol., 57, 755–762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311797409730" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311797409730</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Lorensen and Cline(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorensen, W. E. and Cline, H. E.: Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D
surface construction algorithm, SIGGRAPH '87 Proceedings of the 14th annual conference
on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, New York, 21,
163–169, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Maeno and Ebinuma(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Maeno, N. and Ebinuma, T.: Pressure Sintering of Ice and Its Implication to
the Densification of Snow at Polar Glaciers and Ice Sheets, J. Phys. Chem.,
169, 4103–4110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100244a023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/j100244a023</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Martin et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, C. F., Josserond, C., Salvo, L., Blandin, J. J., Cloetens, P., and
Boller, E.: Characterization by X-ray micro-tomography of cavity coalescence
during superplastic deformation, Scripta Mater., 42, 375–381,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00355-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00355-3</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Martinerie et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Martinerie, P., Lipenkov, V. Y., and Raynaud, D.: Correction od air-content
measurements in polar ice for the effect of cut bubbles at the surface of the
sample, J. Glaciol., 36, 299–303, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Martinerie et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Martinerie, P., Raynaud, D., Etheridge, D. M., Barnola, J. M., and Mazaudier,
D.: Physical and climatic parameters which influence the air content in
polar ice, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 112, 1–13,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(92)90002-D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(92)90002-D</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Martinerie et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Martinerie, P., Lipenkov, V. Y., Raynaud, D., Chappellaz, J., and Lorius, C.:
Air content paleo record in the Vostok ice core (Antarctica): A mixed record
of climatic and glaciological parameters, J. Geophys. Res., 99,
10565–10576, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Mitchell et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, L. E., Buizert, C., Brook, E. J., Breton, D. J., Fegyveresi, J.,
Baggenstos, D., Orsi, A., Severinghaus, J., Alley, R. B., Albert, M., Rhodes,
R. H., McConnell, J. R., Sigl, M., Maselli, O., Gregory, S., and Ahn, J.:
Observing and modeling the influence of layering on bubble trapping in polar
firn, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 2558–2574, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022766" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022766</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Raynaud et al.(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Raynaud, D., Delmas, R., Ascencio, J. M., and Legrand, M.: Gas extraction
from polar ice cores: a critical issue for studying the evolution of
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and ice-sheet surface elevation, Ann. Glaciol., 3,
265–268, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Rhodes et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Rhodes, R. H., Faïn, X., Brook, E. J., McConnell, J. R., Maselli, O. J.,
Sigl, M., Edwards, J., Buizert, C., Blunier, T., Chappellaz, J., and Freitag,
J.: Local artifacts in ice core methane records caused by layered bubble
trapping and in situ production: a multi-site investigation, Clim. Past, 12,
1061–1077, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1061-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1061-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Rolland du Roscoat et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Rolland du Roscoat, S., Decain, M., Thibault, X., Geindreau, C., and Bloch,
J. F.: Estimation of microstructural properties from synchrotron X-ray
microtomography and determination of the REV in paper materials, Acta
Mater., 55, 2841–2850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.050" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.050</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Salmon et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Salmon, P. L., Ohlsson, C., Shefelbine, S. J., and Doube, M.: Structure
model index does not measure rods and plates in trabecular bone,
Front.Endocrinol., 6, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00162" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00162</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Schaller et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Schaller, C. F., Freitag, J., and Eisen, O.: Critical porosity of gas
enclosure in polar firn independent of climate, Clim. Past, 13, 1685–1693,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1685-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1685-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Schindelin et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M.,
Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., Tinevez,
J. Y., White, D. J., hartenstein, V., Eliceiri, K., Tomanacak, P., and
Cardona, A.: Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis,
Nat. Methods, 9, 676–682, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Schneebeli and Sokratov(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Schneebeli, M. and Sokratov, S. A.: Tomography of temperature gradient
metamorphism of snow and associated changes in heat conductivity, Hydrol.
Proc., 18, 3655–3665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5800" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5800</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Schwander(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwander, J.: The Transformation of Snow to Ice and the Occlusion of
Gases, in: The Environmental Record in Glaciers and Ice Sheets, John Wiley,
New York, 53–67, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Schwander and Stauffer(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwander, J. and Stauffer, B.: Age difference between polar ice and the air
trapped in its bubbles, Nature, 311, 45–47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/311045a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/311045a0</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Schwander et al.(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwander, J., Stauffer, B., and Sigg, A.: Air mixing in firn and the age of
the air at pore close-off, Ann. Glaciol., 10, 141–145, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Schwander et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwander, J., Barnola, J.-M., Andrié, C., Leuenberger, M., Ludin, A.,
Raynaud, D., and Stauffer, B.: The age of the air in the firn and the ice at
Summit, Greenland, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 2831–2838,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02383" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02383</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Scott and Kilgour(1969)</label><mixed-citation>
Scott, G. D. and Kilgour, D. M.: The density of random close packing of
spheres, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 2, 863–866, 1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Severinghaus and Battle(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Severinghaus, J. P. and Battle, M. O.: Fractionation of gases in polar ice
during bubble close-off: New constraints from firn air Ne, Kr and Xe
observations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 244, 474–500,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.032</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Severinghaus et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Severinghaus, J. P., Albert, M. R., Courville, Z. R., Fahnestock, M. A.,
Kawamura, K., Montzka, S. A., Mühle, J., Scambos, T. A., Shields, E.,
Shuman, C. A., Suwa, M., Tans, P., and Weiss, R. F.: Deep air convection in
the firn at a zero-accumulation site, central Antarctica, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 293, 359–367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.03.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.03.003</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Sowers et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Sowers, T., Bender, M., Raynaud, D., and Korotkevich, Y.: <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N of
N<sub>2</sub> in air trapped in polar ice: A tracer of gas transport in the firn and
a possible constraint on ice age-gas age differences, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 97, 15683–15697, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Stauffer et al.(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Stauffer, B., Schwander, J., and Oeschger, H.: Enclosure of air during
metamorphosis of dry firn to ice, Ann. Glaciol., 6, 108–112,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/1985AoG6-1-108-112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/1985AoG6-1-108-112</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Sturges et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Sturges, W., McIntyre, H., Penkett, S., Chappellaz, J., Barnola, J.-M.,
Mulvaney, R., Atlas, E., and Stroud, V.: Methyl bromide, other brominated
methanes, and methyl iodide in polar firn air, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
1595–1606, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Sweeney and Martin(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Sweeney, S. M. and Martin, C. L.: Pore size distributions calculated from
3-D images of DEM-simulated powder compacts, Acta Mater., 51, 3635–3639,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00183-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00183-6</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Trudinger et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Trudinger, C. M., Enting, I. G., Etheridge, D. M., Francey, R., Levchenko,
V. A., and Steele, L. P.: Modeling air movement and bubble trapping in
firn, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 6747–6763, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Trudinger et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Trudinger, C. M., Enting, I. G., Rayner, P. J., Etheridge, D. M., Buizert,
C., Rubino, M., Krummel, P. B., and Blunier, T.: How well do different
tracers constrain the firn diffusivity profile?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
1485–1510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1485-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1485-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Veres et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Veres, D., Bazin, L., Landais, A., Toyé Mahamadou Kele, H.,
Lemieux-Dudon, B., Parrenin, F., Martinerie, P., Blayo, E., Blunier, T.,
Capron, E., Chappellaz, J., Rasmussen, S. O., Severi, M., Svensson, A.,
Vinther, B., and Wolff, E. W.: The Antarctic ice core chronology (AICC2012):
an optimized multi-parameter and multi-site dating approach for the last 120
thousand years, Clim. Past, 9, 1733–1748,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1733-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1733-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Verfaillie et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Verfaillie, D., Fily, M., Le Meur, E., Magand, O., Jourdain, B., Arnaud, L.,
and Favier, V.: Snow accumulation variability derived from radar and firn
core data along a 600&thinsp;km transect in Adelie Land, East Antarctic plateau,
The Cryosphere, 6, 1345–1358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-1345-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-1345-2012</a>, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Wautier et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Wautier, A., Geindreau, C., and Flin, F.: Linking snow microstructure to its
macroscopic elastic stiffness tensor: A numerical homogenization method and
its application to 3-D images from X-ray tomography, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 8031–8041, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065227" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065227</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Witrant et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Witrant, E., Martinerie, P., Hogan, C., Laube, J. C., Kawamura, K., Capron,
E., Montzka, S. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etheridge, D., Blunier, T., and
Sturges, W. T.: A new multi-gas constrained model of trace gas
non-homogeneous transport in firn: evaluation and behaviour at eleven polar
sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11465–11483,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11465-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11465-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
