<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-12-2383-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Deglaciation and future stability of the Coats <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Land ice margin, Antarctica</article-title><alt-title>Deglaciation and future stability of the Coats Land ice margin</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Deglaciation and future stability of the Coats Land ice margin}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D. A. Hodgson et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Hodgson</surname><given-names>Dominic A.</given-names></name>
          <email>daho@bas.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3841-3746</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hogan</surname><given-names>Kelly</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1256-8010</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>James M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>James A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-2544</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hillenbrand</surname><given-names>Claus-Dieter</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>Alastair G. C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fretwell</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>Claire</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0938-0551</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Peck</surname><given-names>Vicky</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Arndt</surname><given-names>Jan-Erik</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9413-1612</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Dorschel</surname><given-names>Boris</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3495-5927</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Hübscher</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7380-2344</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>Andrew M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-482X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Larter</surname><given-names>Robert</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8414-7389</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3
0ET, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Geography, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geography, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4RJ, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Alfred Wegener Institute Van-Ronzelen-Str. 2, 27568 Bremerhaven,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute of Geophysics, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 55
20146 Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Dominic A. Hodgson (daho@bas.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>2383</fpage><lpage>2399</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e228">The East
Antarctic Ice Sheet discharges into the Weddell Sea via the Coats Land ice
margin. We have used geophysical data to determine the changing ice-sheet
configuration in this region through its last glacial advance and Holocene
retreat and to identify constraints on its future stability. Methods included
high-resolution multibeam bathymetry, sub-bottom profiles, seismic-reflection
profiles, sediment core analysis and satellite altimetry. These provide
evidence that Coats Land glaciers and ice streams merged with the
palaeo-Filchner Ice Stream during the last glacial advance. Retreat of this
ice stream from 12 848 to 8351 cal. yr BP resulted in its progressive
southwards decoupling from Coats Land outlet glaciers. Moraines and
grounding-zone wedges document the subsequent retreat and thinning of these
glaciers, their loss of contact with the bed and the formation of ice
shelves, which re-advanced to pinning points on topographic highs at the
distal end of the troughs. Once fully detached from the bed, these ice
shelves were predisposed to rapid retreat back to coastal grounding lines.
This was due to reverse-bed slopes, the consequent absence of further pinning
points in the troughs and potentially to the loss of structural integrity
resulting from weaknesses inherited at the grounding line. These processes
explain why there are no large ice shelves in the eastern Weddell Sea between
75.5 and 77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e245">Location maps of the Coats Land ice margin, East Antarctica.
<bold>(a)</bold> Map of Antarctica with ICESat-derived drainage basins
(<uri>http://icesat4.gsfc.nasa.gov/cryo_data/ant_grn_drainage_systems.php</uri>,
last access: 2017) and MEaSUREs ice velocities (Rignot et al., 2011). The
study area is the south-western part of Antarctic Drainage System 4. To the
south of the study area, Antarctic Drainage System 3 discharges into the
Thiel Trough and Filchner Ice Shelf via the Bailey Ice Stream, Slessor,
Recovery and Support Force glaciers. To the north Antarctic Drainage Systems
5 and 6 discharge into the ice shelves of Dronning Maud Land. The black star
is the Penascola Mountains. <bold>(b)</bold> The continental shelf and glaciology
of the eastern Weddell Sea showing the multibeam-bathymetry coverage (for
survey details see text); regional bathymetry is from IBCSO v. 1.0; Arndt et
al. (2013). Hfj. is Heimefrontfjella; TM is Theron Mountains; SR is
Shackleton Range; RG is Recovery Glacier; Wh is Whichaway Nunataks; LIR is
Lyddan Ice Rise. Also shown is the location of offshore glacial landforms
described in Larter et al. (2012) and Arndt et al. (2017). Labelled boxes
show the locations of Figs. 1c, 4a and 5a. <bold>(c)</bold> Detailed map showing
multibeam-bathymetry coverage in glacial troughs of the Coats Land ice margin
and eastern Weddell Sea and the MEaSUREs ice velocities of regional glaciers
and ice streams. The location of datasets shown in Figs. 2, 3 and 7 is marked
by labelled boxes. Labelled white circles with a black borders show the
locations of sediment coring sites referred to in the text and Table 1. VB is
Vahsel Bay.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2383/2018/tc-12-2383-2018-f01.jpg"/>

    </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e271">The Weddell Sea captures the drainage of about one-fifth of Antarctica's
present-day continental ice volume. Recent studies of the submarine and
subglacial topography of the Weddell Sea have revealed features in the
geometry of the ice and bed that make the West Antarctic Ice Sheet
(WAIS) catchments prone to grounding line instability and ice-sheet drawdown.
These include (i) grounding depths of about 1000 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1200 m below sea
level on a bed with locally reversed slopes, (ii) ice close to floatation
inland of the grounding line and (iii) a large subglacial basin upstream of
the present-day grounding line (e.g. BEDMAP 2, Fretwell et al., 2013; Ross et
al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e281">Less well known is the configuration and geometry of the East
Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) catchments draining into the Weddell Sea,
some of which also have ice streams with
subglacial basins upstream of the grounding line (e.g. Bamber et
al., 2006; Rippin et al., 2006). Understanding these catchments is
important because uncertainties remain about the Last Glacial
Maximum (LGM) ice extent, the timing and nature of deglaciation
through Termination 1 and the Holocene and the key processes
determining the present configuration and future stability of the
EAIS in this region. There are currently three main data sources.
First, field data on ice-sheet history based on glacial
geomorphology and cosmogenic isotopes in the interior mountains
(Pensacola Mountains and Shackleton Range; Fig. 1a, c) show only<?pagebreak page2384?> a
minor thickening or no change in the ice-sheet thickness at the LGM
(Bentley et al., 2010; Hein et al., 2011; Hodgson et al., 2012).
Linked to this, some models of the ice-loading history (Whitehouse
et al., 2012a) show subsidence in the western EAIS driven by a
prediction of lower accumulation rates during the glacial period
(Parrenin et al., 2004) and a gradual thickening after the LGM. Data
from further north (Heimefrontfjella; Fig. 1b) have been used to
support the latter (Hättestrand and Johansen, 2005), but the
evidence remains undated. Second, modelling of palaeo-ice
thicknesses in Coats Land based on ice core data suggests initial
thinning from the LGM followed by re-thickening over the last 5 ka
(Huybrechts et al., 2007). Third, marine geological data suggest a
major advance of grounded ice from Coats Land towards the
continental shelf break in the Weddell Sea; however, there is
limited empirical evidence on the timing and nature of this advance and its
subsequent retreat (Hillenbrand et al., 2014, 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e284">It is clear, therefore, that there are insufficient data to underpin
robust assessments of mass balance changes on millennial timescales
over this significant region of Antarctica. As a result, estimates
of the sea-level equivalent volume of LGM ice build-up in the
Weddell Sea range from 1.4 to 3 m (Le Brocq et al., 2011) up to a
maximum of 13.1 m (Bassett et al., 2007), with the contribution
from the palaeo-Filchner Ice Stream (pFIS) possibly being as little
as 0.05 to 0.13 m (Whitehouse et al., 2017). This wide range of
uncertainty limits the accuracy of modelled estimates of<?pagebreak page2385?> sea-level
contributions from the Weddell Sea ice catchments, which is being
addressed by a range of studies. These include developing new
constraints on glacio-isostatic adjustment based on GPS
measurements of uplift and horizontal motion (Whitehouse et al.,
2012b), studies of the ice-sheet history in interior mountain ranges
and nunataks (e.g. Heimefrontfjella, Theron Mountains, Shackleton
Range and Whichaway Nunataks; Fig. 1c) based on cosmogenic isotope
analyses of glacially deposited material (e.g. Hein et al., 2014),
radiocarbon ages on organic deposits that record ice absence (e.g.
Thor and Low, 2010) and studies of the ice sheet where it discharges
into the Weddell Sea. This paper addresses the last of these by
studying the submarine geomorphology of the main glacial outlets of
Coats Land (Fig. 1). Our aims were (i) to understand the nature and
timing of the LGM ice advance from Coats Land and how it interacted
with the pFIS occupying the Filchner Trough; (ii) to identify how
and when the ice retreated; (iii) to describe the physical
constraints on the stability of the current ice margin based on its
submarine geomorphology and ice-sheet geometry and account for the
absence of ice shelves south of 75.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; and (iv) to assess
how these will influence the future stability of the ice margin,
including its largest extant ice-shelf system consisting of the
Brunt Ice Shelf (BIS) and Stancomb-Wills Glacier Tongue (SWGT)
(Fig. 1).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Site description</title>
      <p id="d1e301">The study area is the south-western part of Antarctic Drainage System 4 (as
defined by Zwally et al., 2012) (Fig. 1a). Here, the EAIS discharges into the
Weddell Sea via the Coats Land ice margin: 600 km of marine-terminating
glaciers, glacier tongues and ice shelves along the Luitpold and Caird coasts
between the Filchner and Riiser-Larsen ice shelves from 74 to 77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.
From north to south the main glaciers include the Stancomb-Wills Glacier,
Dawson Lambton Ice Stream, Hayes Glacier, “Lichte Glacier”, Mann Ice
Stream, Weldon Ice Stream, Mosley Ice Stream and the Lerchenfeld and
Schweitzer glaciers. These discharge into the Brunt Basin, Dawson-Lambton,
Caird, Lichte, Möller, “Hoffmann” and Albert troughs, and an unnamed
trough in Vahsel Bay, respectively (quotation marks denote unofficial names).
The Stancomb-Wills Glacier and Dawson Lambton Ice Stream form glacier tongues
extending 250 and 20 km from their grounding lines, respectively. Ice
shelves include the BIS, which is formed from a series of unnamed glaciers
extending from the grounding line and is pinned to the bed at McDonald Ice
Rumples (75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W). Together with the SWGT,
it forms a continuous floating ice mass with a number of large cracks and
chasms and a melange of icebergs and sea ice where it forms at the grounding
line (Anderson et al., 2014). At the southern limit of the study area the
Lerchenfeld and Schweitzer glaciers feed a small (30 km long, 10–20 km
wide) ice shelf maintained through lateral buttressing in Vahsel Bay
(Fig. 1b).<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><caption><p id="d1e353">Radiocarbon dates on calcareous (micro- and macro-) fossils and bulk
sediments from sediment cores analysed in this study together with a compilation of
previously published ages that track the southward migration of the Filchner
Ice Shelf front from core sites G2, 3-6-1, GC569, G7 and PS1621 (locations shown in Fig. 1b). Down core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C dates were corrected using a marine reservoir
effect of 1260 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 years (core top age from GC630; Delta R value of
860 (1260 minus the global marine reservoir of 400 years)). Radiocarbon dates
were calibrated with Calib v7.0.2, using the Marine13 calibration dataset
(Reimer et al., 2013). bF is benthic foraminifera, and pF is planktonic
foraminifera. Other potential regional marine reservoir corrections (MRC)
could be applied that would typically make the calibrated ages older,
including a core top age from southern Filchner Trough (GC599) of
530 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 yr BP (Delta R value of 130 (530 minus the global marine
reservoir of 400 years)).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Core ID</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Publication code</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Material dated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C age</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> error</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">MRC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col10" nameend="col12" align="center">Cal. yr BP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(cm below surface)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(yr BP)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ‰)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> error)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Min</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Mean</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC626</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-447014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mixed bF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC626</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-447015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mixed bF, pF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31 310</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">33 737</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">34 542</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">34 140</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC630</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-447011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bryozoan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC630</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-447013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bivalve, coral/bryo fragments</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30 950</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">190</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">33 463</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">34 210</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">33 837</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC630</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-447012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mixed shell (bryozoan, petropod)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21 990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">24 519</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">25 343</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">24 931</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC570</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-433170</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bulk organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4280</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3198</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3375</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3292</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC570</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-310042</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bulk organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5730</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.9)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">5052</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5281</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5187</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC569</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-433168</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bulk organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5540</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4823</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">4996</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4899</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC569</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-433169</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">40.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bulk organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6980</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6455</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">6639</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6550</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC569</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-310043</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bulk organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6760</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6228</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">6406</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6317</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC569</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-310044</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">190</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bulk organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5230</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4397</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">4648</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4509</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC569</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-310045</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">277</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bulk organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4620</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3598</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3803</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3693</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC569</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-310046</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">386</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bulk organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 790</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">13 255</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">13 514</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">13 382</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>G2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CCAMS-87464</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80–85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">bF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 235</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(30)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12 628</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">13 067</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">12 848</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>3-6-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CCAMS-95858</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28–31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">bF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9760</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9380</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">9729</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">9555</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GC569</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta-310046</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">386</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bulk organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 790</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">13 255</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">13 514</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">8483<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>G7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CCAMS-95867</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">bF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9040</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(100)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8379</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">8972</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">8676</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>PS1621</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HD-13276</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18–27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Barnacle shells</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8790</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(45)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8175</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">8527</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">8351</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e379"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Previously published ages (Hillenbrand et al., 2014;
supplementary tables). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GC569 basal date with Beta-433168, 4899 core top age
subtracted.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e1440">Multibeam-bathymetric surveys of accessible troughs were carried out on the
RRS <italic>James Clark Ross</italic> cruise JR244 in February–March 2011 and
combined with data from JR97 in February–March 2005 and JR259 in
February–March 2012. These surveys include the bathymetry presented in
Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 7d and multiple ship tracks along the margins of Filchner
Trough and BIS. The data were acquired with a hull-mounted Kongsberg-Simrad
EM 120 multibeam echo sounder operated in a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
configuration, emitting 191 beams at a frequency of 11.25–12.75 kHz. The
system acquires data at a resolution that allows for gridding with cell sizes
of 10–70 m, dependent on water depth. Port and starboard beam angles were
typically 68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in a swath width of up to 5 times water
depth. Additional multibeam data were acquired by the RV <italic>Polarstern</italic>
using Hydrosweep DS1 (expeditions ANT-VIII/5 (1989/90), ANT-IX/3 (1991),
ANT-X/2 (1992) and ANT-XII/3 (1995)), DS2 (ANT-XVI/2 (1999)), DS3 (PS82
(2013/14)) and PS96 (2015/16) systems. These surveys include the bathymetry
presented in Fig. 7a and c and ship tracks in the eastern Weddell Sea. These
data were processed in CARIS HIPS/SIPS. The EM 120 multibeam data were
ping-edited in the UNIX-based MB System<sup>™</sup>
(<uri>http://www.mbari.org/data/mbsystem</uri>, last access: 2017) and all
datasets were gridded together using MB System and QPS Fledermaus. Final
gridded datasets were produced with cell sizes ranging from 35 to 40 m. This
ensured that the highest-resolution grid was obtained whilst ensuring that
each cell included multiple seafloor soundings. Minimal interpolation of the
grids was then performed to fill small holes (up to 6 grid cells in one
direction) in the data. Visualisation and morphological analyses were carried
out in QPS Fledermaus and ArcGIS software.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2387?><p id="d1e1490">The multibeam data were supplemented with regional bathymetry from the
International Bathymetric Chart of the Southern Ocean (IBSCO; Arndt et al.,
2013). In the region of the BIS and SWGT a new 500 m regional grid was
produced from all available sea floor depth data. This included (i) pixels
from IBSCO that directly overlaid source data, including single-beam echo
sounder depth surveys; (ii) depth measurements from historical ship tracks
inland of the present ice-shelf front, currently at its most advanced
position since at least 1958 and probably since 1915 (Anderson et al.,
2014); (iii) pixels from BEDMAP2 (Fretwell et al., 2013) that overlaid source
data inland of the grounding line; and (iv) 38 unpublished BAS seismic
soundings acquired in 2004 from the surface of the BIS–SWGT. Several assumptions of ice
density were made to convert these seismic soundings to depths; the top 30 m
of ice was assumed to be a firn layer with a mean density of
750 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, giving a seismic velocity of 3.2 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Below this
the ice was treated as a solid with a seismic velocity of 3.7 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The seawater cavity was modelled with a seismic velocity of 1455 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
based on a mean depth of 600 m, salinity of 35 ppt and temperature of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The seismic soundings were acquired with a 400 m
12-geophone cable with take-outs every 30 m, connected to a Bison
seismograph. Standard seismic high-explosive 200 g charges were initiated
by electric detonators. The network of 47 seismic data points were screened
for interference from the internal structure of the ice shelf with 9 outliers
discarded from the analysis. Point datasets were combined and then re-gridded
using the “Topo to Raster” tool in ArcGIS, with an output cell size of
500 m.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1563">Geomorphology of glacial troughs downstream of low-velocity glaciers
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <bold>(a, b)</bold> Hoffmann Trough,
<bold>(c)</bold> Möller Trough and <bold>(d)</bold> Lichte Trough, with labelled
examples of streamlined landforms, moraines and bedrock terrain. Sediment
core locations are marked by white circles with associated core numbers.
Background image is an Envisat synthetic aperture radar image from
21 February 2011 to show the position of the ice front during the survey (cruise
JR244). <bold>(e)</bold> Long profiles down the central axis of the troughs
showing rugged but generally landward-dipping geometries; profile locations
are marked with white dotted lines in panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold>
and <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2383/2018/tc-12-2383-2018-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1619">Geomorphology of glacial troughs downstream of high-velocity
glaciers (250–500 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Background image is an Envisat synthetic
aperture radar image from 21 February 2011 to show the position of the ice
front during the survey (cruise JR244). <bold>(a)</bold> Dawson-Lambton Trough, black line shows the location of
seismic-reflection profile BAS101-s116 along the strike of the large
grounding-zone wedge (GZW, shown in Fig 8a), <bold>(b)</bold> Caird Trough and
<bold>(c)</bold> Albert Trough, with labelled examples of streamlined landforms,
moraines (arrowed and labelled “M”) and GZWs. <bold>(d)</bold> Long profiles
down the central axis of the troughs showing landward-dipping geometries;
profile locations are marked with white dotted lines in
panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>. <bold>(e)</bold> Cross
profiles over prominent ridge features interpreted as moraines; profile
locations are marked with solid white lines in panels <bold>(b)</bold>
and <bold>(c)</bold>. Sediment core locations are marked by white circles with
associated core numbers.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2383/2018/tc-12-2383-2018-f03.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1676"><bold>(a)</bold> Bathymetry of the McDonald Bank, a topographic high
that rises to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 220 m (water depth) under the Brunt Ice Shelf between
the Brunt Basin and the Filchner Trough in the eastern Weddell Sea. The
south-east part of the McDonald Bank consists of a ca. 75 m high ridge of
sediments with internal truncated reflections (seismic profile 5; Elverhøi
and Maisey, 1983). At its highest point, this ridge makes contact with the
Brunt Ice Shelf forming the McDonald Ice Rumples. Three-dimensional images of grounding-zone wedges (GZWs) in
<bold>(b)</bold> Dawson-Lambton Trough and <bold>(c)</bold> Albert Trough. Black
arrows in <bold>(b)</bold> point to glacial lineations; insets show
cross profiles of the GZWs.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2383/2018/tc-12-2383-2018-f04.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1703">Seafloor sediments were investigated using sub-bottom profiles along the
long axes of the surveyed glacial troughs, one seismic-reflection profile and
multiple sediment cores.</p>
      <p id="d1e1706">Sub-bottom profiles were acquired on RRS <italic>James Clark Ross</italic> with a hull-mounted Kongsberg Simrad TOPAS
PS018 sub-bottom parametric echo sounder with secondary chirp pulse
frequencies between 1.3 and 5 kHz.</p>
      <p id="d1e1712">Seismic data were acquired on the same vessel using a high-resolution air gun
seismic-reflection profiling system consisting of a single GI gun, firing in
true GI mode with generator and injector volumes of 45 and
105 in.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, producing a signal of 100 Hz
dominant frequency. A 16-channel streamer with a channel spacing of 6.25 m,
with an active section of 100 m, was used for recording the data. Data
processing included frequency filtering (15–350 Hz), gain, velocity
analysis (every 50 CMPs), NMO correction, coherency filtering, stacking, time
migration, bandpass, white noise removal, dip filtering and FX deconvolution
as described in Hübscher and Gohl (2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e1725">To determine the nature of the bed and the sedimentological record of
glaciation, sediment cores were collected with a combination of a
3–12 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110 mm gravity corer (P. Smit, Netherlands) and a
300 mm square box corer (Duncan &amp; Associates). Cores were split and
described at the British Antarctic Survey, UK, following standard methods
(Smith et al., 2011). Shear strength was measured on the split cores using a
handheld shear vane. Sediment slices of 1 cm  were weighed, dried and used to
calculate water content. Dried samples were then disaggregated and passed
through 2 mm and 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m sieves to obtain gravel, sand and mud
fractions. To establish a chronology, calcareous (micro-)fossils were picked
from the 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m to 2 mm fraction and, if sufficient in volume, were
submitted for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C dating at Beta Analytic, USA. Where microfossils were
absent the acid-insoluble organic fraction was dated. Dates were calibrated
with Calib v7.0.2, utilising the Marine13 calibration dataset (Reimer et al.,
2013) and a marine reservoir effect of 1260 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 years, (core top age
from GC630; Delta R of 860 (1260 minus the global marine reservoir of 400).
Other reservoir ages or surface corrections have also been applied in this
region (e.g. Hillenbrand et al., 2014, 2012; Stolldorf et al., 2012),
Table 1.</p>
      <p id="d1e1765">Interactions between ice shelves and the bed were studied using ICESat
surface altimetry (Zwally et al., 2012). All geophysical data are archived in
the NERC UK Polar Data Centre (<uri>https://www.bas.ac.uk/data/uk-pdc/</uri>, last
access: 18 July 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1778">Ice from Coats Land discharges into the Weddell Sea via a series of glaciers
and ice streams with velocities ranging from less than 100 to over
500 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1c). These glaciers terminate in a series of deeply
incised W- to WNW-oriented glacial troughs, approximately 50 km apart and
extending up to 40 km from the present ice margin towards the Filchner
Trough. The troughs share a number of common glacial geomorphological
features including marked reverse-bed slopes, over-deepened basins, moraine
complexes, streamlined landforms and grounding-zone wedges (GZWs), described
below.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Glacial troughs with reverse-bed slopes, over-deepened basins and
sediment infills</title>
      <p id="d1e1798">All surveyed glacial troughs were characterised by reverse-bed slopes ranging
from moderate (e.g. Möller Trough, which deepens by 100 m along a 34 km
profile; Fig. 2c, e) to steep (e.g. Albert Trough, which deepens by 450 m
along a 26 km profile; Fig. 3c, d).</p>
      <p id="d1e1801">Over-deepened basins are present in all troughs with the deepest
basins being at the eastern limits of the surveys, closest to the
modern ice front. In some cases, large, deep basins were
observed extending under the modern ice front, for example in the
Caird and Albert troughs (e.g. Fig. 3b, c). In other cases, such as
the Hoffman, Möller, Lichte and SWGT troughs, there are a series
of two or more deep basins becoming progressively more poorly
defined with increasing distance from the modern ice front (Figs. 2, 5). Some
of the deep basins have 20 to 60 m high  moraines on their seaward
side, for example in Caird and Albert troughs (Fig. 3b, c, e). Other
deep basins are separated by bedrock sills, for example in
Dawson-Lambton Trough, where the deep basins have complex
morphologies that appear to be bedrock controlled (Fig. 3a).</p>
      <p id="d1e1804">The volume of sediment infilling in the troughs and deep basins is
variable with troughs downstream of the lower-velocity glaciers
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 1b) typically characterised by
ice-moulded bedrock and low volumes of sediment (e.g. Hoffmann,
Möller and Lichte troughs; Fig. 2a–c). This was confirmed by
gravity and box cores, which only recovered 18 cm of diamicton  overlain by 40 cm of diatomaceous ooze in
Möller Trough (BC608, Fig. 2c)
and 47 cm of sediments in Lichte Trough (GC613, Fig. 2d), or did not recover
any sediments (box core BC606 and gravity cores GC609 and GC610;
Fig. 2c). In contrast, troughs downstream of higher-velocity
glaciers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, including the Albert and
Dawson-Lambton troughs (Fig. 3a–c) and the Brunt Basin
(Figs. 4, 5), contain high volumes of sediments. In<?pagebreak page2388?> Albert Trough a
sediment drape is present in the 900 m deep inner basin. A box core
from this basin (BC566; Fig. 3c) consists of a gravelly mud unit
overlain by a diatomaceous ooze with abundant dropstones. A similar
sequence was found in a 4.08 m long gravity core (GC569; see
Fig. 3c for location, Fig. 6 for core log) which included a glacial
deposit of stiff, greenish-grey gravelly mud and clasts below
3.88 m overlain by laminated diatomaceous muds and oozes with
occasional sand layers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Moraines and moraine complexes</title>
      <p id="d1e1854">Arcuate ridges of several kilometres in length and up to 35 m in height are
present in Hoffmann, Albert and Caird troughs (Figs. 2a, 3b, c). These ridges
are transverse to the long axis of the troughs, typically symmetric and
steep-sided in cross profile (Fig. 3e). There is no acoustic penetration of
these features on sub-bottom profiles, suggesting that they consist of coarse,
diamictic and/or compacted material. The most extensive ridges occur at the
western end of the trough basins (e.g. Hoffmann, Albert and the
Lerchenfeld/Schweitzer glacier troughs; Figs. 2a, 3c, 7c). The dimensions,
morphologies and locations of these ridges, transverse to the former ice-flow
direction, indicate that they represent terminal push moraines formed during
an advance or readvance of grounded ice in the troughs (e.g. Ottesen et al.,
2005). The smaller ridges found at topographic highs and/or narrow trough
sections between trough basins (e.g. Hoffmann and Caird troughs;
Figs. 2a, 3b) most likely represent recessional moraines formed during minor
still stands of the retreating grounding line.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2389?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Streamlined landforms</title>
      <?pagebreak page2390?><p id="d1e1863">A variety of elongate streamlined landforms also occur in the
troughs. These range from long, low amplitude, straight ridges, to
arcuate ridges separated by depressions (e.g. Dawson-Lambton and
Albert troughs; Fig. 3a, c); dimensions are 1–3 km in length,
5–10 m in height and 200–500 m in width with elongation ratios
of up to 10 : 1. The subdued morphology of the ridges and rare
sub-bottom reflections in TOPAS profiles indicate that they consist
of unlithified sediments. We interpret these trough-parallel
landforms as subglacial lineations formed by fast glacier flow over
a deformable bed (see King et al., 2009; Ó Cofaigh et al.,
2005). Shorter streamlined landforms consist of rounded to blunt-nosed
hills with a tapered (seaward) end up to 70 m high and 1.8 km long
(elongation ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 : 1), usually in the inner and middle
parts of the troughs (Figs. 2d, 3c). Sub-bottom profiles do not show
penetration through acoustic basement, indicating that these
features are likely formed in bedrock. These landforms are
interpreted as subglacially moulded rôche moutonnée,
whaleback forms and small crag and tails (see Livingstone et al.,
2015; Nitsche et al., 2013). In Albert Trough, glacial lineations
extend throughout the trough and curve northwards, where the trough
widens into the Weddell Sea Embayment (Figs. 4c, 7d), suggesting
that past ice flow was deflected northwards where the Albert
Glacier joined the pFIS in Filchner Trough.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e1875"><bold>(a)</bold> Submarine geomorphology under the Brunt Ice Shelf and
Stancomb-Wills Glacier Tongue (BIS–SWGT) showing that the Brunt Basin
consists of a NNW-oriented glacial trough beneath the BIS and SWGT, separated from the Filchner Trough by the
McDonald Bank. This image was compiled from multiple data sources, including
multibeam and single beam bathymetric data incorporating historical ship
tracks inland of the present ice-shelf front, the International Bathymetric
Chart of the Southern Ocean data (IBSCO; Arndt et al., 2013) and seismic
surveys of the depth to the seabed from the surface of the BIS–SWGT. Black
arrows depict contemporary ice-flow directions. <bold>(b)</bold> Data density
including locations of ship tracks (solid black lines offshore), historical
depth soundings (dots on the SWGT) radar surveys (solid back lines over the
inland ice) and ice-shelf seismic survey points (dots on the BIS).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2383/2018/tc-12-2383-2018-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e1891">Sediment core log for GC569, a 4.08 m long gravity core from the
deep basin in Albert Trough (see Fig. 3c for location). The core consists of
stiff, greenish-grey gravelly mud and clasts below 3.88 m, overlain by
laminated diatomaceous muds and oozes with occasional sand layers. The latter
indicate open water marine sedimentation over the site or possibly
advection of nearby diatom blooms under an ice shelf.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2383/2018/tc-12-2383-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1903">Detail of landform assemblages west of the Coats Land glacial
troughs indicating connections to the main ice stream advance and retreat in
Filchner Trough. <bold>(a)</bold> A series of five GZWs marked by numbered dashed
lines and recessional moraines marked by arrows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 km north of Caird
Trough with cross profile in <bold>(b)</bold>; profile across three of the
GZWs west of Caird Trough. The
location of the profile is marked by the white dotted line in <bold>(a)</bold>.
<bold>(c)</bold> Landforms in Vashel Bay formed by extension of the Lerchenfeld
and Schweitzer glaciers. The approximate trough margins, based on the
bathymetry, are marked with black dotted lines. <bold>(d)</bold> Landforms west
and north of Albert Trough showing lineations (labelled “M”) trending
parallel to past ice flow in Filchner Trough (red arrow) and across-flow GZWs
marked by numbered dashed lines.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2383/2018/tc-12-2383-2018-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1937">Seismic and sub-bottom parametric echo sounder profiles
over GZWs on the Coats Land margin. <bold>(a)</bold> Seismic-reflection
profile BAS101-s116 along-strike of the large GZW upstream of the
deep basin in Dawson-Lambton Trough (location shown in Fig. 3a).
This shows that the GZW consists of up to 80 m of unconsolidated
stratified sediment units over a rugged bedrock surface (black
dotted line). Prograding strata are indicated by red lines, together
with lenticular bodies and faults. Onlapping basin fills are marked
by yellow arrowheads. Thickness bar on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis calculated with
1.6–2.0 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> TOPAS sub-bottom parametric
echo sounder profile over a GZW in Albert Trough (for location see
black dotted line in Fig. 3c). This shows generally impenetrable
upper reflections. <bold>(c)</bold> TOPAS sub-bottom parametric echo sounder profile over the GZW in
Dawson-Lambton Trough showing ponded sediment in depressions and the locations of coring sites GC630
and GC626 (for location see black dotted line in Fig. 3a). VE is the vertical exaggeration and TWT is
the two-way travel time in seconds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2383/2018/tc-12-2383-2018-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1984">X-ray images, lithology, shear strength, water content and grain
size analyses for sediment cores. <bold>(a)</bold> GC630 from the crest of the GZW
in the Dawson-Lambton Trough. The core consists of stratified pebbly/sandy
muds at its base (137.5–90 cm) overlain by a massive a muddy diamicton
(90–55.5 cm) and then a sequence of gravelly sands and sandy muds
(55.5–0 cm). Shear strength generally increases downcore, reaching a
maximum of 12 kPa. <bold>(b)</bold> GC626 on the distal side of the GZW. The
core consists of a sequence of a sandy mud at its base (90–75 cm) with
dispersed foraminifera throughout, overlain by normally graded
foraminifera-bearing gravel to muddy sand (75–22 cm). Above this
(22–0 cm) is a homogenous sandy mud, with dispersed gravel grains in the
top 5 cm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2383/2018/tc-12-2383-2018-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2001"><bold>(a)</bold> Surface altimetry of the north-eastern part of the Brunt
Ice Shelf and the McDonald Ice Rumples showing the deformation of the ice
shelf where it is deflected around the McDonald Bank (Fig. 5).
<bold>(b)</bold> An oblique aerial photograph of the McDonald Ice Rumples in 2017,
facing NNW (credit: Jan de Rydt, BAS).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2383/2018/tc-12-2383-2018-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Grounding-zone wedges and topographic highs</title>
      <p id="d1e2022">Relatively wide (2–40 km), subdued, asymmetric ridges and
topographic highs occur offshore of the Caird and Albert troughs
(Fig. 7) and inshore within the Dawson-Lambton and Albert
troughs (Fig. 4b, c). These features are up to 100 m high and have
the steep seaward-facing slopes and gentler landward slopes typical
of GZWs (Dowdeswell and Fugelli, 2012; Graham et al., 2009). These
typically form at the grounding line of a retreating ice mass when
it pauses for periods of several decades up to a few thousand years
(Alley et al., 1989; Dowdeswell and Fugelli, 2012). The widest GZWs
or recessional moraines are found <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 km north-west of Caird
Trough, marking a series of at least five grounding line positions
(Fig. 7a). There are similar GZWs, marking at<?pagebreak page2391?> least three grounding
line positions north of Albert Trough (Figs. 4c, 7d), the
northernmost two of which (Figs. 7d, 1 and 2) are oriented
transverse to past ice flow in Filchner Trough (Fig. 7d, red arrow).</p>
      <p id="d1e2032">The GZW within the Dawson-Lambton Trough was studied in detail. Its gently
dipping upstream side (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and much steeper downstream side
(7–9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 4b) indicate that it was deposited by a
seaward-thinning glacier, and the presence of lineations and notable absence
of plough marks suggest that ice was fast flowing and probably already near
to floatation (see Batchelor and Dowdeswell, 2015). An along-strike seismic
profile shows multiple architectural units. These include dipping reflections
in a bank at the western side of the wedge consistent with development
through lateral progradation. Along-trough progradation can be inferred from
the top sets and discrete units in the internal architecture of the GZW
(Fig. 8a). The base of a sediment core recovered from the crest of the GZW
(GC630, Fig. 9a) consists of a sandy mud containing large clasts, calcareous
marine micro-fossils. Its low water content and high shear strength
are consistent with glaciomarine
sediments. This is overlain by a thin layer of structureless diamicton,
interpreted as a subglacial till formed by grounded ice. The upper unit of
the core consists of gravelly sands and sandy muds. A second core on the
seaward side of the GZW (GC626, Fig. 9b) is characterised by a sequence of
sandy mud and normally graded gravel to muddy sand, interpreted as debris
flows,<?pagebreak page2392?> likely generated from glaciomarine sediments reworked by ice grounded
on the crest of GZW.</p>
      <p id="d1e2060">A topographic high occurs to the west of the Brunt Basin (Figs. 4a, 5). Named
the McDonald Bank, it forms part of a 100–400 m high ridge of glacial
sediments with internal truncated reflectors (seismic profile 5; Elverhøi
and Maisey, 1983) rising to within ca. 220 m of present sea level. Surface
altimetry of the BIS shows that the McDonald Bank deflects the flow of the
SWGT to the north and BIS  to the south. Back stresses create a series
of upstream concentric pressure waves in the ice shelf. This area of
deformation is known as the McDonald Ice Rumples (75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), which cover an area of approximately
3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10). Apart from the Lyddan Ice Rise (north of
the SWGT, Fig. 1c), the deformation of the BIS around the McDonald Ice Rumples is the only
evidence in the study area of ice being in contact with the bed beyond the grounding line. This
can be attributed to differences in water depth, with the McDonald Bank being
less than 220 m from the surface while the topographic highs formed by
the GZWs in Dawson-Lambton and Albert troughs are at 380 and 450 m,
respectively (Fig. 4b, c). These differences in water depth constrain the
potential of these topographic highs to act as pinning points for advancing
ice streams and glacier tongues.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Chronological constraints</title>
      <p id="d1e2122">The timing of ice advance and retreat is not well constrained by our data.</p>
      <p id="d1e2125">Mixed microfossil ages of ca. 34 140 cal. yr BP (at 80 cm core depth)
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C yr BP (at 60 cm depth; Table 1) were found in
the gravity-flow deposits sampled at the base of the GZW in Dawson-Lambton
Trough (GC626, Fig. 9b). This suggests that glaciomarine sediments from
Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS3), and predating the last ice advance, were present and
being reworked during the progradation of the GZW.</p>
      <p id="d1e2144">A radiocarbon age of 24 931 cal. yr BP (Table 1) from a calcareous
microfossil in the glaciomarine sediments, immediately underlying the
diamicton on the crest of the<?pagebreak page2393?> GZW in Dawson-Lambton Trough (100 cm in GC630,
Fig. 9a), provides a minimum age constraint before the onset of the last ice
advance. The older microfossil age of ca. 33 837 cal. yr BP is found in
the overlying sandy mud at 40 cm core depth can be attributed to the
continued reworking and progradation of MIS3
glaciomarine sediments.</p>
      <p id="d1e2147">In terms of ice retreat, a basal date from GC569 in the deep basin in Albert
Trough (Fig. 6) gave a bulk acid-insoluble organic age of
13 382 cal. yr BP (Table 1). Subtracting the 4899 yr surface age of the
core yields a minimum corrected age of 8483 cal. yr BP. The presence of
mixed ages (ranging from 3693 to 6550 cal. yr BP) in the diatomaceous ooze
above 3.88 m indicates that this date must be treated with caution due to
sediment mixing and/or varying contributions of reworked fossil carbon.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e2157">Observations in the vicinity of present-day grounding lines are typically
difficult to obtain in Antarctica (De Rydt and Gudmundsson, 2016). One way
of addressing this is to study the bed geometry along coastlines exhibiting
various stages of ice retreat. Applied here, this approach has revealed many
of the features constraining the regional dynamics of the Coats Land ice
margin. Below we describe what these glacial geomorphological features
reveal about the ice sheet during<?pagebreak page2394?> the last maximum ice advance, the modes of
ice retreat and the influence of the bed and ice geometry on future regional
ice-shelf and ice-sheet stability.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Last maximum ice advance</title>
      <p id="d1e2165">The MIS3 marine microfossils incorporated in the reworked sediments
of Albert and Dawson-Lambton troughs and elsewhere in the Weddell
Sea (Hillenbrand et al., 2014) suggest widespread seasonally open
water before the last main ice advance. This, in addition to
previous advances, has contributed to the erosion of the 450–900
deep glacial troughs and trough basins along the Coats Land ice margin. The
streamlined landforms in bedrock, moraine complexes trending NNW
from Albert Trough (Fig. 4c), GZWs north of Albert Trough (Fig. 7c)
and the NNW-trending trough under the BIS–SWGT show that ice flow
from Coats Land was redirected by the pFIS, contributing to a
regional ice advance in the Filchner Trough sometime after
24 931 cal. yr BP (GC630). In Filchner Trough, this ice advance
has previously been dated to sometime after 11 800 cal. yr BP
(Arndt et al., 2017). It followed evidence of an earlier ice advance
prior to 27 500 cal. yr BP (Arndt et al., 2017), which was
characterised by subglacial lineations and drumlins extending to
within approximately 40 km of the shelf break (Fig. 1c) (Gales et
al., 2012; Hillenbrand et al., 2014; Larter et al., 2012). Combined,
the evidence suggests that streaming ice in the Coats Land troughs,
together with the major ice streams feeding the pFIS (Bailey Ice
Stream, Slessor and Recovery glaciers) and lower relative sea
levels, may have contributed to the drawdown of the interior ice
sheet. This would provide a mechanism for the minor thickening, lack
of change or even thinning seen in the hinterland (Bentley et al.,
2010; Hein et al., 2011; Hodgson et al., 2012; Parrenin et al.,
2004; Whitehouse et al., 2012a).</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2395?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Ice retreat</title>
      <p id="d1e2174">The large volumes of glacial sediments in the Filchner Trough and downstream
of the higher-velocity Coats Land glaciers have been reworked into a number
of landforms that document the retreat of grounded ice. The first group of
landforms includes features oriented transverse to the pFIS, the best
examples being the previously described GZWs in Filchner Trough (Arndt et
al., 2017; Larter et al., 2012) and beyond Albert Trough (this study,
Fig. 7d). The second group of landforms is oriented transverse to the ice
streams, glaciers and ice shelves discharging from Coats Land. These include
the GZWs beyond Caird Trough (Fig. 7a) and  Lerchenfeld Glacier (Fig. 7c),
terminal moraines at the seaward end of the deep basins and at trough
narrowings, and the within-trough GZWs. These landform assemblages suggest at
least four phases in the ice retreat across the inner shelf.</p>
      <p id="d1e2177">The first phase was the southward migration of the pFIS ice front in the
eastern Weddell Sea and the progressive loss of contact between the Filchner
Ice Shelf and Coats Land glaciers from 12 848 to 8351 cal. yr BP. The
timing of this southward migration is consistent with “scenario B” of Hillenbrand et
al. (2014)  for regional deglaciation, with sediment age
constraints from this, and other studies, tracking an approximate north-to-south migration of the Filchner Ice Shelf (Table 1). This began with core G2
off the Dawson-Lambton Trough at 12 848 cal. yr BP, followed by core
3-6-1 off Caird Trough at 9555 cal. yr BP, core GC569 in Albert Trough at
8483 cal. yr BP (this study with the surface correction applied), core G7
off the Lerchenfeld and Schweitzer glaciers at 8676 cal. yr BP and core
PS1621 south of Vahsel Bay near the Filchner Ice Shelf front at
8351 cal. yr BP (all core locations in Fig. 1c). At some point during this
southward migration the pFIS lifted off the bed and became an ice shelf,
resulting in the preservation of subglacial lineations and drumlins in
Filchner Trough (Fig. 1b; Larter et al., 2012). Landforms associated with
grounded ice and quasi-stable ice-margin positions, such as GZWs, are
therefore rare in the main Filchner Trough; the exceptions are one GZW
landward of linear iceberg furrows on the outer shelf (Larter et al., 2012),
and one stacked GZW on the outer shelf, deposited after
11 800 cal. yr BP. (Arndt et al., 2017). However, chronological control
and survey data are exceedingly sparse over most of the trough (as shown by
Fig. 1b, c).</p>
      <p id="d1e2180">The southward-migrating Filchner Ice Shelf front resulted in a loss
of buttressing and a shift in the orientation of the Coats Land
glaciers that initiated their retreat. This second phase of grounded
ice retreat was punctuated by grounding line halts at the trough
narrowings (e.g. Fig. 3b and c) and topographic highs, the formation
of GZWs and moraines at the seaward end of the deep basins in the
troughs (e.g. Fig. 3e). The period of grounding line stability
provided by the progradation of the GZWs was likely short-lived,
possibly in the region of a few hundreds to thousands of years
(based on estimates elsewhere: Batchelor and Dowdeswell, 2015;
Dowdeswell and Fugelli, 2012; Jakobsson et al., 2012), and would
have been dependent on<?pagebreak page2396?> sediment flux rates (Graham et al., 2010;
Livingstone et al., 2016) and water depth.</p>
      <p id="d1e2183">The third phase involved development of subglacial cavities, loss of contact
with the bed and the formation of ice shelves along the Coats Land ice
margin. The absence of iceberg plough marks and recessional moraines in the
troughs with soft sedimentary substrates suggests that this phase of ice
retreat was controlled by thinning to form ice shelves and not retreat of
grounded calving ice fronts.</p>
      <p id="d1e2187">Based on the landform assemblages in the troughs and modern analogues around
the nearby Dronning Maud Land ice margin we infer that, during the fourth
phase, the newly formed ice shelves advanced to the shallower, outer parts of
the troughs. Here, at least some of them would have re-grounded on
topographic highs and on inner trough GZWs. In the latter case, the
re-grounding may have reworked at least part of the sediments comprising the
GZWs – for example the prograded structures on the surface of the GZW in
Dawson-Lambton Trough (Fig. 8a), and the gravelly sands and sandy muds
overlaying the structureless diamicton in GC630 (Fig. 9a). However, once
the ice shelves thinned to the point where mechanical contact with the bed
was fully lost, the reverse-bed slope and consequent absence of further
pinning points, likely resulted in their rapid retreat back towards the
modern coastal grounding line where a rising bed stabilises the ice sheet.
These processes, in particular the loss of contact with the bed, explain the
absence of large extant ice shelves between 75.5 and 77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Future behaviour of the ice sheet and ice shelves</title>
      <p id="d1e2205">The submarine geomorphology, ice-sheet geometry, and deglacial history of
the Coats Land ice margin provide constraints on the future behaviour of the
ice sheet in this region.</p>
      <p id="d1e2208">First, it is clear that loss of the connection between the ice shelves and
the bed had a threshold impact on ice-shelf stability. The geomorphological
evidence suggests that current absence of ice shelves south of the BIS (75.5–77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) can be attributed to loss of contact with the
bed, with the reverse-bed slopes (Figs. 2e, 3d) depriving retreating ice
shelves of further pinning points.</p>
      <p id="d1e2220">This failure to reconnect with the bed is exemplified by the behaviour of the
SWGT and the Dawson-Lambton Ice Stream tongues, which are essentially “failed
ice shelves”. Historical records show successive extensions of these
glaciers over the last 100 years have been of insufficient extent or
thickness to re-establish contact with the topographic highs at the distal
ends of their troughs. These have included a temporary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km long ice
tongue in front of the Dawson-Lambton Ice Stream surveyed during the 1958
International Geophysical Year (Admiralty Charts, British Antarctic Survey
Archives), and an extension, then substantial calving, of the SWGT sometime
between 1915 and 1955 (Thomas, 1973). The latter shows that the SWGT remains
predisposed to large-scale calving events despite potential lateral
buttressing from the Lyddan Ice Rise (Fig. 1c) and McDonald Ice Rumples
(Fig. 10).</p>
      <p id="d1e2230">In this context the BIS can be considered close to failure as connection with
the bed is limited to a very small (3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 km) part of the McDonald
Bank. This represents about 0.03 % of the surface area of the BIS–SWGT
using the 27 950 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> estimate of Humbert et al. (2009). Here the
limited contact with the bed makes the ice shelf particularly vulnerable to
only moderate changes in ice draught. A surge event in 1971 (Thomas, 1973) is
consistent with a thinning of the ice shelf and a temporary loss of contact
with the bed. As a result, ice-shelf velocities accelerated from 400 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 700 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between 1968 and 1982 (Simmons and Rouse, 1984),
immediately preceded by the formation of rifts upstream of the ice rumples in
1968 (Thomas, 1973). This behaviour is supported by an ice-flow model which
shows that temporary loss of mechanical contact with the bed simulated for
the 1971 local calving event can explain both a near-instantaneous 2-fold
increase in ice velocities over a large section of the ice shelf and a
subsequent decrease once contact was re-established  with the McDonald Bank (Gudmundsson et al.,
2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e2269">Second, the extant glacier tongues and ice shelves consist of ice which loses
its structural integrity when flowing across the steep grounding line (King et al.,
2018). For example, at the grounding lines of the Stancomb-Wills Glacier and
the unnamed glaciers feeding the BIS, the marked change in
surface gradient forms a “hinge zone” at the transition between the
interior grounded ice and floating ice masses. This change in gradient known as the Brunt Icefalls (75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W;
Fig. 5) extends for about 80 km. Here, the ice-sheet fragments into a
melange of icebergs forward of the grounding line (Anderson et al., 2014). These
meteoric icebergs then “fuse” together with sea ice and with falling and
drifting snow layers bridging the space between them to form a structurally
heterogeneous ice shelf. Although sea ice has plastic (and therefore
stabilising) properties (Holland et al., 2015), the meteoric ice units are
more prone to fracture (Kulessa et al., 2014). However, observations on the
BIS have shown that rifts preferentially skirt the edges of the incorporated
icebergs and slow their rate of propagation when forced by the stress field
to break through them (King et al., 2018). It is still not known whether the
heterogeneous nature of these ice shelves will make them more or less
vulnerable to break-up once detached from the bed.</p>
      <p id="d1e2308">A relatively stable ice-sheet configuration is reached once the calving
fronts of ice streams and glaciers have retreated to the coastal grounding
line. Here the bedrock rises above sea level within ca. 10 km from the
coast, and the ice streams and glaciers calve directly into the Weddell Sea.
This stable configuration is consistent with an ice-sheet model that suggests
stability of the Coats Land ice margin during the last interglacial (DeConto
and Pollard, 2016).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2397?><sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2318">Widespread open water was present in the Weddell Sea before the LGM, with
MIS3 marine microfossils of 34 140 cal. yr BP and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 500
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C yr BP being incorporated in the sediments of Dawson-Lambton Trough
and elsewhere (Hillenbrand et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e2337">Sometime before 24 931 cal. yr BP (most likely between 34 140 and
27 500 cal. yr BP) and possibly sometime thereafter (most likely after
11 800 cal. yr BP), Coats Land glaciers and ice streams advanced and were
diverted northwards, flowing parallel with the pFIS and contributing to
major ice advances in Filchner Trough. This, together with lower sea levels,
may have contributed to regional drawdown of ice, in part explaining the
minor thickening, lack of change or even thinning in the interior ice sheet.</p>
      <p id="d1e2340">Ice retreat consisted of the southward migration of the pFIS ice front and
the loss of contact with the Coats Land ice streams and glaciers. This
resulted in the removal of buttressing by the pFIS and a progressive north-to-south
deglaciation of the Coats Land troughs between 12 848 (Dawson-Lambton Trough) and
8351 cal. yr BP near the present Filchner Ice Shelf front. The retreat of
grounded ice up the troughs was punctuated by grounding line halts at the
trough narrowings and topographic highs, as well as the formation of sedimentary
features such as GZWs and moraines at the seaward end of the deep basins in
the troughs.</p>
      <p id="d1e2343">Loss of ice contact with the bed formed ice shelves, and an absence of
iceberg plough marks suggests that this was controlled by thinning and not
by calving. The advance of the ice shelves to the shallower, outer parts
of the troughs may have resulted in their re-grounding on some of the
within-trough GZWs and topographic highs.</p>
      <p id="d1e2347">Subsequent retreat of these ice shelves was governed by the interaction
between the ice and the bed. Once the ice thinned to the point where
mechanical contact with the bed was fully lost, the reverse-bed slope
and consequent absence of further pinning points in the troughs resulted in their rapid retreat
to the present-day grounding line. These processes explain the absence of
large extant ice shelves between the BIS and Filchner Ice Shelf.</p>
      <p id="d1e2350">The fact that ice shelves are absent along much of the Coats Land ice margin
suggests that loss of buttressing has been more important than atmospheric
or ocean temperatures in determining where ice shelves have survived in this
region. At the BIS–SWGT, contact with the bed at the McDonald Ice Rumples is
therefore critical to maintaining the ice shelf in the future.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e2357">The datasets used in this paper are available at the NERC
UK Polar Data Centre (<uri>https://www.bas.ac.uk/data/uk-pdc/</uri>, last access:
18 July 2018).</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e2367">The study was conceived and written by DAH and KH.
DAH, RL, JAS, CD H, CA, VP and AGCG took part in JR244 collecting and
processing the geophysical data and sediment cores. Additional datasets were
assembled by PF (BIS altimetry and sub-ice shelf topographic
compilation), AMS (Seismic data under BIS–SWGT), JMS
(editing multibeam data), CH (processing seismic profile
of GZW in Dawson-Lambton Trough), JEA, and BD
(multibeam data from Alfred Wegener Institute). All authors commented on the
manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e2373">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2379">This study was supported by the captain, officers and ship's crew of
RRS <italic>James Clark Ross</italic> cruise JR244 as well as other members
of the shipboard scientific party, including Jenny A. Gales,
Svein Østerhus, Mark O. Preston, Mark W. Robinson,
Jeremy P. Robst, Marcel Ruhnau, Daniela Sprenk and Jonas Wagner.
Jan-Erik Arndt was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(DFG, German Research Foundation) grant AR 1087/1-1. This research
contributes to NERC grant NE/K003674/1 “Reducing the uncertainty in
estimates of the sea level contribution from the westernmost part of
the East Antarctic Ice Sheet”. The editor and reviewers are thanked
for their constructive suggestions that improved the manuscript.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Chris R.
Stokes<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: Brian J. Todd and Andrew Hein</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alley, R. B., Blankenship, D. D., Rooney, S. T., and Bentley, C. R.:
Sedimentation beneath ice shelves – the view from ice stream B, Mar.
Geol., 85, 101–120, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, R., Jones, D. H., and Gudmundsson, G. H.: Halley Research Station,
Antarctica: calving risks and monitoring strategies, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst.
Sci., 14, 917–927, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-917-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-14-917-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Arndt, J. E., Schenke, H. W., Jakobsson, M., Nitsche, F. O., Buys, G.,
Goleby, B., Rebesco, M., Bohoyo, F., Hong, J., Black, J., Greku, R.,
Udintsev, G., Barrios, F., Reynoso-Peralta, W., Taisei, M., and Wigley, R.:
The International Bathymetric Chart of the Southern Ocean (IBCSO) Version 1.0
– A new bathymetric compilation covering circum-Antarctic waters, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 40, 3111–3117, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Arndt, J. E., Hillenbrand, C. D., Grobe, H., Kuhn, G., and Wacker, L.:
Evidence for a dynamic grounding-line in outer Filchner Trough, Antarctica,
until the early Holocene, Geology, 45, 1035–1038, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G39398.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G39398.1</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bamber, J. L., Ferraccioli, F., Joughin, I., Shepherd, T., Rippin, D. M.,
Siegert, M. J., and Vaughan, D. G.: East Antarctic ice stream tributary
underlain by major sedimentary basin, Geology, 34, 33–36, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bassett, S. E., Milne, G. A., Bentley, M. J., and Huybrechts, P.: Modelling
Antarctic sea-level data to explore the possibility of a<?pagebreak page2398?> dominant Antarctic
contribution to meltwater pulse IA, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 26, 2113–2127,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Batchelor, C. L. and Dowdeswell, J. A.: Ice-sheet grounding-zone wedges
(GZWs) on high-latitude continental margins, Mar. Geol., 363, 65–92, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bentley, M. J., Fogwill, C. J., Le Brocq, A. M., Hubbard, A. L., Sugden, D.
E., Dunai, T., and Freeman, S. P. H. T.: Deglacial history of the West
Antarctic Ice Sheet in the Weddell Sea embayment: constraints on past ice
volume change, Geology, 38, 411–414, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>De Rydt, J. and Gudmundsson, G. H.: Coupled ice shelf-ocean modeling and
complex grounding line retreat from a seabed ridge, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
121, 865–880, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003791" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JF003791</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
DeConto, R. M. and Pollard, D.: Contribution of Antarctica to past and future
sea-level rise, Nature, 531, 591–597, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Dowdeswell, J. A. and Fugelli, E. M. G.: The seismic architecture and
geometry of grounding-zone wedges formed at the marine margins of past ice
sheets, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 124, 1750–1761, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/b30628.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/b30628.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Elverhøi, A. and Maisey, G.: Glacial erosion and morphology of the eastern
and southeastern Weddell Sea shelf, in: Fourth International Symposium
Antarctic Earth Science, edited by: Oliver, R. L., James, P. R., and Jago, J.
B., Aust. Acad. of Sci., Adelaide, South Australia, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Fretwell, P., Pritchard, H. D., Vaughan, D. G., Bamber, J. L., Barrand, N.
E., Bell, R., Bianchi, C., Bingham, R. G., Blankenship, D. D., Casassa, G.,
Catania, G., Callens, D., Conway, H., Cook, A. J., Corr, H. F. J., Damaske,
D., Damm, V., Ferraccioli, F., Forsberg, R., Fujita, S., Gim, Y., Gogineni,
P., Griggs, J. A., Hindmarsh, R. C. A., Holmlund, P., Holt, J. W., Jacobel,
R. W., Jenkins, A., Jokat, W., Jordan, T., King, E. C., Kohler, J., Krabill,
W., Riger-Kusk, M., Langley, K. A., Leitchenkov, G., Leuschen, C., Luyendyk,
B. P., Matsuoka, K., Mouginot, J., Nitsche, F. O., Nogi, Y., Nost, O. A.,
Popov, S. V., Rignot, E., Rippin, D. M., Rivera, A., Roberts, J., Ross, N.,
Siegert, M. J., Smith, A. M., Steinhage, D., Studinger, M., Sun, B., Tinto,
B. K., Welch, B. C., Wilson, D., Young, D. A., Xiangbin, C., and Zirizzotti,
A.: Bedmap2: improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica,
The Cryosphere, 7, 375–393, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-375-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-375-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Gales, J. A., Larter, R. D., Mitchell, N. C., Hillenbrand, C. D.,
Østerhus, S., and Shoosmith, D. R.: Southern Weddell Sea shelf edge
geomorphology: Implications for gully formation by the overflow of
high-salinity water, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 117, F04021,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JF002357" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JF002357</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Graham, A. G. C., Larter, R. D., Gohl, K., Hillenbrand, C. D., Smith, J. A.,
and Kuhn, G.: Bedform signature of a West Antarctic palaeo-ice stream reveals
a multi-temporal record of flow and substrate control, Quaternary Sci. Rev.,
28, 2774–2793, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Graham, A. G. C., Larter, R. D., Gohl, K., Dowdeswell, J. A., Hillenbrand, C.
D., Smith, J. A., Evans, J., Kuhn, G., and Deen, T. J.: Flow and retreat of
the Late Quaternary Pine Island-Thwaites palaeo-ice stream, West Antarctica,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 115, F03025, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001482" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JF001482</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gudmundsson, G. H., De Rydt, J., and Nagler, T.: Five decades of strong
temporal variability in the flow of the Brunt Ice Shelf, Antarctica, J.
Glaciol., 63, 164–175, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hättestrand, C. and Johansen, N.: Supraglacial moraines in
Scharffenbergbotnen, Heimefrontfjella, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica –
significance for reconstructing former blue ice areas, Antarct. Sci., 17,
225–236, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hein, A. S., Fogwill, C. J., Sugden, D. E., and Xu, S.: Glacial/interglacial
ice-stream stability in the Weddell Sea embayment, Antarctica, Earth Planet.
Sc. Lett., 307, 211–221, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hein, A. S., Fogwill, C. J., Sugden, D. E., and Xu, S.: Geological scatter of
cosmogenic-nuclide exposure ages in the Shackleton Range, Antarctica:
Implications for glacial history, Quat. Geochronol., 19, 52–66, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hillenbrand, C. D., Melles, M., Kuhn, G., and Larter, R. D.: Marine
geological constraints for the grounding-line position of the Antarctic Ice
Sheet on the southern Weddell Sea shelf at the Last Glacial Maximum,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 32, 25–47, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hillenbrand, C. D., Bentley, M. J., Stolldorf, T., Hein, A. S., Kuhn, G.,
Graham, A. C. G., Fogwill, C. J., Kristoffersen, Y., Smith, J. A., Anderson,
J. B., Larter, R. D., Melles, M., Hodgson, D. A., Mulvaney, R., and Sugden,
D. E.: Reconstruction of changes in the Weddell Sea sector of the Antarctic
Ice Sheet since the Last Glacial Maximum, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 100,
111–136, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hodgson, D. A., Bentley, M. J., Schnabel, C., Cziferszky, A., Convey, P., and
Xu, S.: Glacial geomorphology and cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Al exposure
ages in the northern Dufek Massif, Weddell Sea embayment, Antarctica,
Antarct. Sci., 24, 377–394, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102012000016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0954102012000016</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Holland, P. R., Brisbourne, A., Corr, H. F. J., McGrath, D., Purdon, K.,
Paden, J., Fricker, H. A., Paolo, F. S., and Fleming, A. H.: Oceanic and
atmospheric forcing of Larsen C Ice-Shelf thinning, The Cryosphere, 9,
1005–1024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1005-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-1005-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hübscher, C. and Gohl, K.: Reflection/Refraction Seismology, Encyclopedia
of Marine Geosciences,<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/987-94-007-6644-0_128-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/987-94-007-6644-0_128-1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Humbert, A., Kleiner, T., Mohrholz, C.-O., Oelke, C., Greve, R., and Lange,
M. R.: A comparative modeling study of the Brunt Ice Shelf/Stancomb-Wills Ice
Tongue system, East Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 55, 53–65, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Huybrechts, P., Rybak, O., Pattyn, F., Ruth, U., and Steinhage, D.: Ice
thinning, upstream advection, and non-climatic biases for the upper 89 %
of the EDML ice core from a nested model of the Antarctic ice sheet, Clim.
Past, 3, 577–589, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-577-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-3-577-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Jakobsson, M., Anderson, J. B., Nitsche, F. O., Gyllencreutz, R., Kirshner,
A. E., Kirchner, N., O'Regan, M., Mohammad, R., and Eriksson, B.: Ice sheet
retreat dynamics inferred from glacial morphology of the central Pine Island
Bay Trough, West Antarctica, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 38, 1–10, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
King, E. C., Hindmarsh, R. C. A., and Stokes, C. R.: Formation of mega-scale
glacial lineations observed beneath a West Antarctic ice stream, Nat.
Geosci., 2, 585–588, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>King, E. C., De Rydt, J., and Gudmundsson, G. H.: The internal structure of
the Brunt Ice Shelf from ice-penetrating radar analysis and implications for
ice shelf fracture, The Cryosphere Discuss.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-2018-13</ext-link>, in review, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kulessa, B., Jansen, D., Luckman, A. J., King, E. C., and Sammonds, P. R.:
Marine ice regulates the future stability of a large Antarctic ice shelf,
Nat. Comm., 5, 3707, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4707" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms4707</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2399?><ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Larter, R. D., Graham, A. G. C., Hillenbrand, C.-D., Smith, J. A., and Gales,
J. A.: Late Quaternary grounded ice extent in the Filchner Trough, Weddell
Sea, Antarctica: new marine geophysical evidence, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 53,
111–122, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Le Brocq, A. M., Bentley, M. J., Hubbard, A., Fogwill, C. J., Sugden, D. E.,
and Whitehouse, P. L.: Reconstructing the Last Glacial Maximum ice sheet in
the Weddell Sea embayment, Antarctica, using numerical modelling constrained
by field evidence, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 30, 2422–2432, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Livingstone, S. J., Storrar, R. D., Hillier, J. K., Stokes, C. R., Clark, C.
D., and Tarasov, L.: An ice-sheet scale comparison of eskers with modelled
subglacial drainage routes, Geomorphology, 246, 104–112, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Livingstone, S. J., Ó Cofaigh, C., Hogan, K. A., and Dowdeswell, J. A.:
Submarine glacial-landform distribution along an Antarctic Peninsula
palaeo-ice stream: a shelf–slope transect through the Marguerite Trough
system (66–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 46,
485–492, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Nitsche, F. O., Gohl, K., Larter, R. D., Hillenbrand, C.-D., Kuhn, G., Smith,
J. A., Jacobs, S., Anderson, J. B., and Jakobsson, M.: Paleo ice flow and
subglacial meltwater dynamics in Pine Island Bay, West Antarctica, The
Cryosphere, 7, 249–262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-249-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-249-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ó Cofaigh, C., Dowdeswell, J. A., Allen, C. S., Hiemstra, J. F., Pudsey,
C. J., Evans, J., and Evans, D. J. A.: Flow dynamics and till genesis
associated with a marine-based Antarctic palaeo-ice stream, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 24, 709–740, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Ottesen, D., Dowdeswell, J. A., and Rise, L.: Submarine landforms and the
reconstruction of fast-flowing ice streams within a large Quaternary ice
sheet: The 2500-km-long Norwegian-Svalbard margin
(57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), GSA Bulletin, 117, 1033–1050, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Parrenin, F., Rémy, F., Ritz, C., Siegert, M. J., and Jouzel, J.: New
modeling of the Vostok ice flow line and implication for the glaciological
chronology of the Vostok ice core, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D20102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004561</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Reimer, P. J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Blackwell, P. G., Ramsey,
C. B., Buck, C. E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P. M.,
Guilderson, T. P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T. J.,
Hoffmann, D. L., Hogg, A. G., Hughen, K. A., Kaiser, K. F., Kromer, B.,
Manning, S. W., Niu, M., Reimer, R. W., Richards, D. A., Scott, E. M.,
Southon, J. R., Staff, R. A., Turney, C. S. M., and van der Plicht, J.:
IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal
BP, Radiocarbon, 55, 1869–1887, 2013.  </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., and Scheuchl, B.: Ice Flow of the Antarctic Ice
Sheet, Science, 333, 1427–1430, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Rippin, D. M., Siegert, M. J., Bamber, J. L., Vaughan, D. G., and Corr, H. F.
J.: Switch-off of a major enhanced ice flow unit in East Antarctica, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 33, L15501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026648" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026648</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Ross, N., Bingham, R. G., Corr, H. F. J., Ferraccioli, F., Jordan, T. A., Le
Brocq, A., Rippin, D. M., Young, D., Blankenship, D. D., and Siegert, M. J.:
Steep reverse bed slope at the grounding line of the Weddell Sea sector in
West Antarctica, Nat. Geosci., 5, 393–396, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Simmons, D. A. and Rouse, J. R.: Accelerating Flow of the Brunt Ice Shelf,
Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 30, 377–380, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. A., Hillenbrand, C.-D., Kuhn, G., Larter, R., Graham, A. G. C.,
Ehrmann, W., Moreton, S. G., and Forwick, M.: Deglacial history of the West
Antarctic Ice Sheet in the western Amundsen Sea Embayment, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 30, 488–505, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Stolldorf, T., Schenke, H. W., and Anderson, J. B.: LGM ice sheet extent in
the Weddell Sea: Evidence for diachronous behavior of Antarctic Ice Sheets,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 48, 20–31, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, R. H.: The dynamics of the Brunt Ice Shelf, Coats Land, Antarctica
British Antarctic Survey Sci. Rep.-UK, 79, 1–47, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Thor, G. and Low, M.: The persistence of the snow petrel (Pagodroma nivea) in
Dronning Maud Land (Antarctica) for over 37,000 years, Polar Biol., 34,
609–613, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Whitehouse, P. L., Bentley, M. J., and Le Brocq, A. M.: A deglacial model for
Antarctica: geological constraints and glaciological modelling as a basis for
a new model of Antarctic glacial isostatic adjustment, Quaternary Sci. Rev.,
32, 1–24, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Whitehouse, P. L., Bentley, M. J., Milne, G. A., King, M. A., and Thomas, I.
D.: A new glacial isostatic model for Antarctica: calibrated and tested using
observations of relative sea-level change and present-day uplift rates,
Geophys. J. Int., 190, 1464–1482, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Whitehouse, P. L., Bentley, M. J., Vieli, A., Jamieson, S. S. R., Hein, A.
S., and Sugden, D. E.: Controls on Last Glacial Maximum ice extent in the
Weddell Sea embayment, Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 122, 371–397,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Zwally, H. J., Giovinetto, M. B., Beckley, M. A., and Saba, J. L.: Antarctic
and Greenland Drainage Systems, GSFC Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory,
available at:
<uri>http://icesat4.gsfc.nasa.gov/cryo_data/ant_grn_drainage_systems.php</uri>,
last access: 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Deglaciation and future stability of the Coats Land ice margin, Antarctica</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The East
Antarctic Ice Sheet discharges into the Weddell Sea via the Coats Land ice
margin. We have used geophysical data to determine the changing ice-sheet
configuration in this region through its last glacial advance and Holocene
retreat and to identify constraints on its future stability. Methods included
high-resolution multibeam bathymetry, sub-bottom profiles, seismic-reflection
profiles, sediment core analysis and satellite altimetry. These provide
evidence that Coats Land glaciers and ice streams merged with the
palaeo-Filchner Ice Stream during the last glacial advance. Retreat of this
ice stream from 12&thinsp;848 to 8351&thinsp;cal.&thinsp;yr&thinsp;BP resulted in its progressive
southwards decoupling from Coats Land outlet glaciers. Moraines and
grounding-zone wedges document the subsequent retreat and thinning of these
glaciers, their loss of contact with the bed and the formation of ice
shelves, which re-advanced to pinning points on topographic highs at the
distal end of the troughs. Once fully detached from the bed, these ice
shelves were predisposed to rapid retreat back to coastal grounding lines.
This was due to reverse-bed slopes, the consequent absence of further pinning
points in the troughs and potentially to the loss of structural integrity
resulting from weaknesses inherited at the grounding line. These processes
explain why there are no large ice shelves in the eastern Weddell Sea between
75.5 and 77°&thinsp;S.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alley, R. B., Blankenship, D. D., Rooney, S. T., and Bentley, C. R.:
Sedimentation beneath ice shelves – the view from ice stream B, Mar.
Geol., 85, 101–120, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, R., Jones, D. H., and Gudmundsson, G. H.: Halley Research Station,
Antarctica: calving risks and monitoring strategies, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst.
Sci., 14, 917–927, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-917-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-917-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Arndt, J. E., Schenke, H. W., Jakobsson, M., Nitsche, F. O., Buys, G.,
Goleby, B., Rebesco, M., Bohoyo, F., Hong, J., Black, J., Greku, R.,
Udintsev, G., Barrios, F., Reynoso-Peralta, W., Taisei, M., and Wigley, R.:
The International Bathymetric Chart of the Southern Ocean (IBCSO) Version 1.0
– A new bathymetric compilation covering circum-Antarctic waters, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 40, 3111–3117, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arndt, J. E., Hillenbrand, C. D., Grobe, H., Kuhn, G., and Wacker, L.:
Evidence for a dynamic grounding-line in outer Filchner Trough, Antarctica,
until the early Holocene, Geology, 45, 1035–1038, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G39398.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G39398.1</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bamber, J. L., Ferraccioli, F., Joughin, I., Shepherd, T., Rippin, D. M.,
Siegert, M. J., and Vaughan, D. G.: East Antarctic ice stream tributary
underlain by major sedimentary basin, Geology, 34, 33–36, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bassett, S. E., Milne, G. A., Bentley, M. J., and Huybrechts, P.: Modelling
Antarctic sea-level data to explore the possibility of a dominant Antarctic
contribution to meltwater pulse IA, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 26, 2113–2127,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Batchelor, C. L. and Dowdeswell, J. A.: Ice-sheet grounding-zone wedges
(GZWs) on high-latitude continental margins, Mar. Geol., 363, 65–92, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bentley, M. J., Fogwill, C. J., Le Brocq, A. M., Hubbard, A. L., Sugden, D.
E., Dunai, T., and Freeman, S. P. H. T.: Deglacial history of the West
Antarctic Ice Sheet in the Weddell Sea embayment: constraints on past ice
volume change, Geology, 38, 411–414, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
De Rydt, J. and Gudmundsson, G. H.: Coupled ice shelf-ocean modeling and
complex grounding line retreat from a seabed ridge, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
121, 865–880, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003791" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003791</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
DeConto, R. M. and Pollard, D.: Contribution of Antarctica to past and future
sea-level rise, Nature, 531, 591–597, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dowdeswell, J. A. and Fugelli, E. M. G.: The seismic architecture and
geometry of grounding-zone wedges formed at the marine margins of past ice
sheets, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 124, 1750–1761, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/b30628.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/b30628.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Elverhøi, A. and Maisey, G.: Glacial erosion and morphology of the eastern
and southeastern Weddell Sea shelf, in: Fourth International Symposium
Antarctic Earth Science, edited by: Oliver, R. L., James, P. R., and Jago, J.
B., Aust. Acad. of Sci., Adelaide, South Australia, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fretwell, P., Pritchard, H. D., Vaughan, D. G., Bamber, J. L., Barrand, N.
E., Bell, R., Bianchi, C., Bingham, R. G., Blankenship, D. D., Casassa, G.,
Catania, G., Callens, D., Conway, H., Cook, A. J., Corr, H. F. J., Damaske,
D., Damm, V., Ferraccioli, F., Forsberg, R., Fujita, S., Gim, Y., Gogineni,
P., Griggs, J. A., Hindmarsh, R. C. A., Holmlund, P., Holt, J. W., Jacobel,
R. W., Jenkins, A., Jokat, W., Jordan, T., King, E. C., Kohler, J., Krabill,
W., Riger-Kusk, M., Langley, K. A., Leitchenkov, G., Leuschen, C., Luyendyk,
B. P., Matsuoka, K., Mouginot, J., Nitsche, F. O., Nogi, Y., Nost, O. A.,
Popov, S. V., Rignot, E., Rippin, D. M., Rivera, A., Roberts, J., Ross, N.,
Siegert, M. J., Smith, A. M., Steinhage, D., Studinger, M., Sun, B., Tinto,
B. K., Welch, B. C., Wilson, D., Young, D. A., Xiangbin, C., and Zirizzotti,
A.: Bedmap2: improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica,
The Cryosphere, 7, 375–393, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-375-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-375-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gales, J. A., Larter, R. D., Mitchell, N. C., Hillenbrand, C. D.,
Østerhus, S., and Shoosmith, D. R.: Southern Weddell Sea shelf edge
geomorphology: Implications for gully formation by the overflow of
high-salinity water, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 117, F04021,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JF002357" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JF002357</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Graham, A. G. C., Larter, R. D., Gohl, K., Hillenbrand, C. D., Smith, J. A.,
and Kuhn, G.: Bedform signature of a West Antarctic palaeo-ice stream reveals
a multi-temporal record of flow and substrate control, Quaternary Sci. Rev.,
28, 2774–2793, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Graham, A. G. C., Larter, R. D., Gohl, K., Dowdeswell, J. A., Hillenbrand, C.
D., Smith, J. A., Evans, J., Kuhn, G., and Deen, T. J.: Flow and retreat of
the Late Quaternary Pine Island-Thwaites palaeo-ice stream, West Antarctica,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 115, F03025, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001482" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001482</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gudmundsson, G. H., De Rydt, J., and Nagler, T.: Five decades of strong
temporal variability in the flow of the Brunt Ice Shelf, Antarctica, J.
Glaciol., 63, 164–175, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hättestrand, C. and Johansen, N.: Supraglacial moraines in
Scharffenbergbotnen, Heimefrontfjella, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica –
significance for reconstructing former blue ice areas, Antarct. Sci., 17,
225–236, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hein, A. S., Fogwill, C. J., Sugden, D. E., and Xu, S.: Glacial/interglacial
ice-stream stability in the Weddell Sea embayment, Antarctica, Earth Planet.
Sc. Lett., 307, 211–221, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hein, A. S., Fogwill, C. J., Sugden, D. E., and Xu, S.: Geological scatter of
cosmogenic-nuclide exposure ages in the Shackleton Range, Antarctica:
Implications for glacial history, Quat. Geochronol., 19, 52–66, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hillenbrand, C. D., Melles, M., Kuhn, G., and Larter, R. D.: Marine
geological constraints for the grounding-line position of the Antarctic Ice
Sheet on the southern Weddell Sea shelf at the Last Glacial Maximum,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 32, 25–47, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hillenbrand, C. D., Bentley, M. J., Stolldorf, T., Hein, A. S., Kuhn, G.,
Graham, A. C. G., Fogwill, C. J., Kristoffersen, Y., Smith, J. A., Anderson,
J. B., Larter, R. D., Melles, M., Hodgson, D. A., Mulvaney, R., and Sugden,
D. E.: Reconstruction of changes in the Weddell Sea sector of the Antarctic
Ice Sheet since the Last Glacial Maximum, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 100,
111–136, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hodgson, D. A., Bentley, M. J., Schnabel, C., Cziferszky, A., Convey, P., and
Xu, S.: Glacial geomorphology and cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>26</sup>Al exposure
ages in the northern Dufek Massif, Weddell Sea embayment, Antarctica,
Antarct. Sci., 24, 377–394, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102012000016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102012000016</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Holland, P. R., Brisbourne, A., Corr, H. F. J., McGrath, D., Purdon, K.,
Paden, J., Fricker, H. A., Paolo, F. S., and Fleming, A. H.: Oceanic and
atmospheric forcing of Larsen C Ice-Shelf thinning, The Cryosphere, 9,
1005–1024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1005-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1005-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hübscher, C. and Gohl, K.: Reflection/Refraction Seismology, Encyclopedia
of Marine Geosciences,<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/987-94-007-6644-0_128-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/987-94-007-6644-0_128-1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Humbert, A., Kleiner, T., Mohrholz, C.-O., Oelke, C., Greve, R., and Lange,
M. R.: A comparative modeling study of the Brunt Ice Shelf/Stancomb-Wills Ice
Tongue system, East Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 55, 53–65, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Huybrechts, P., Rybak, O., Pattyn, F., Ruth, U., and Steinhage, D.: Ice
thinning, upstream advection, and non-climatic biases for the upper 89&thinsp;%
of the EDML ice core from a nested model of the Antarctic ice sheet, Clim.
Past, 3, 577–589, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-577-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-577-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Jakobsson, M., Anderson, J. B., Nitsche, F. O., Gyllencreutz, R., Kirshner,
A. E., Kirchner, N., O'Regan, M., Mohammad, R., and Eriksson, B.: Ice sheet
retreat dynamics inferred from glacial morphology of the central Pine Island
Bay Trough, West Antarctica, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 38, 1–10, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
King, E. C., Hindmarsh, R. C. A., and Stokes, C. R.: Formation of mega-scale
glacial lineations observed beneath a West Antarctic ice stream, Nat.
Geosci., 2, 585–588, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
King, E. C., De Rydt, J., and Gudmundsson, G. H.: The internal structure of
the Brunt Ice Shelf from ice-penetrating radar analysis and implications for
ice shelf fracture, The Cryosphere Discuss.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-13</a>, in review, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kulessa, B., Jansen, D., Luckman, A. J., King, E. C., and Sammonds, P. R.:
Marine ice regulates the future stability of a large Antarctic ice shelf,
Nat. Comm., 5, 3707, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4707" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4707</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Larter, R. D., Graham, A. G. C., Hillenbrand, C.-D., Smith, J. A., and Gales,
J. A.: Late Quaternary grounded ice extent in the Filchner Trough, Weddell
Sea, Antarctica: new marine geophysical evidence, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 53,
111–122, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Le Brocq, A. M., Bentley, M. J., Hubbard, A., Fogwill, C. J., Sugden, D. E.,
and Whitehouse, P. L.: Reconstructing the Last Glacial Maximum ice sheet in
the Weddell Sea embayment, Antarctica, using numerical modelling constrained
by field evidence, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 30, 2422–2432, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Livingstone, S. J., Storrar, R. D., Hillier, J. K., Stokes, C. R., Clark, C.
D., and Tarasov, L.: An ice-sheet scale comparison of eskers with modelled
subglacial drainage routes, Geomorphology, 246, 104–112, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Livingstone, S. J., Ó Cofaigh, C., Hogan, K. A., and Dowdeswell, J. A.:
Submarine glacial-landform distribution along an Antarctic Peninsula
palaeo-ice stream: a shelf–slope transect through the Marguerite Trough
system (66–70°&thinsp;S), Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 46,
485–492, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Nitsche, F. O., Gohl, K., Larter, R. D., Hillenbrand, C.-D., Kuhn, G., Smith,
J. A., Jacobs, S., Anderson, J. B., and Jakobsson, M.: Paleo ice flow and
subglacial meltwater dynamics in Pine Island Bay, West Antarctica, The
Cryosphere, 7, 249–262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-249-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-249-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ó Cofaigh, C., Dowdeswell, J. A., Allen, C. S., Hiemstra, J. F., Pudsey,
C. J., Evans, J., and Evans, D. J. A.: Flow dynamics and till genesis
associated with a marine-based Antarctic palaeo-ice stream, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 24, 709–740, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Ottesen, D., Dowdeswell, J. A., and Rise, L.: Submarine landforms and the
reconstruction of fast-flowing ice streams within a large Quaternary ice
sheet: The 2500-km-long Norwegian-Svalbard margin
(57°–80°&thinsp;N), GSA Bulletin, 117, 1033–1050, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Parrenin, F., Rémy, F., Ritz, C., Siegert, M. J., and Jouzel, J.: New
modeling of the Vostok ice flow line and implication for the glaciological
chronology of the Vostok ice core, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D20102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004561</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Reimer, P. J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Blackwell, P. G., Ramsey,
C. B., Buck, C. E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P. M.,
Guilderson, T. P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T. J.,
Hoffmann, D. L., Hogg, A. G., Hughen, K. A., Kaiser, K. F., Kromer, B.,
Manning, S. W., Niu, M., Reimer, R. W., Richards, D. A., Scott, E. M.,
Southon, J. R., Staff, R. A., Turney, C. S. M., and van der Plicht, J.:
IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal
BP, Radiocarbon, 55, 1869–1887, 2013. 
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., and Scheuchl, B.: Ice Flow of the Antarctic Ice
Sheet, Science, 333, 1427–1430, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Rippin, D. M., Siegert, M. J., Bamber, J. L., Vaughan, D. G., and Corr, H. F.
J.: Switch-off of a major enhanced ice flow unit in East Antarctica, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 33, L15501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026648" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026648</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Ross, N., Bingham, R. G., Corr, H. F. J., Ferraccioli, F., Jordan, T. A., Le
Brocq, A., Rippin, D. M., Young, D., Blankenship, D. D., and Siegert, M. J.:
Steep reverse bed slope at the grounding line of the Weddell Sea sector in
West Antarctica, Nat. Geosci., 5, 393–396, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Simmons, D. A. and Rouse, J. R.: Accelerating Flow of the Brunt Ice Shelf,
Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 30, 377–380, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. A., Hillenbrand, C.-D., Kuhn, G., Larter, R., Graham, A. G. C.,
Ehrmann, W., Moreton, S. G., and Forwick, M.: Deglacial history of the West
Antarctic Ice Sheet in the western Amundsen Sea Embayment, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 30, 488–505, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Stolldorf, T., Schenke, H. W., and Anderson, J. B.: LGM ice sheet extent in
the Weddell Sea: Evidence for diachronous behavior of Antarctic Ice Sheets,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 48, 20–31, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, R. H.: The dynamics of the Brunt Ice Shelf, Coats Land, Antarctica
British Antarctic Survey Sci. Rep.-UK, 79, 1–47, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Thor, G. and Low, M.: The persistence of the snow petrel (Pagodroma nivea) in
Dronning Maud Land (Antarctica) for over 37,000 years, Polar Biol., 34,
609–613, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Whitehouse, P. L., Bentley, M. J., and Le Brocq, A. M.: A deglacial model for
Antarctica: geological constraints and glaciological modelling as a basis for
a new model of Antarctic glacial isostatic adjustment, Quaternary Sci. Rev.,
32, 1–24, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Whitehouse, P. L., Bentley, M. J., Milne, G. A., King, M. A., and Thomas, I.
D.: A new glacial isostatic model for Antarctica: calibrated and tested using
observations of relative sea-level change and present-day uplift rates,
Geophys. J. Int., 190, 1464–1482, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Whitehouse, P. L., Bentley, M. J., Vieli, A., Jamieson, S. S. R., Hein, A.
S., and Sugden, D. E.: Controls on Last Glacial Maximum ice extent in the
Weddell Sea embayment, Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 122, 371–397,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Zwally, H. J., Giovinetto, M. B., Beckley, M. A., and Saba, J. L.: Antarctic
and Greenland Drainage Systems, GSFC Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory,
available at:
<a href="http://icesat4.gsfc.nasa.gov/cryo_data/ant_grn_drainage_systems.php" target="_blank">http://icesat4.gsfc.nasa.gov/cryo_data/ant_grn_drainage_systems.php</a>,
last access: 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
