<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-12-2109-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Local topography increasingly influences the mass balance of<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> a retreating cirque glacier</article-title><alt-title>Mass balance of a retreating cirque glacier</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Mass balance of a retreating cirque glacier}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~Florentine et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Florentine</surname><given-names>Caitlyn</given-names></name>
          <email>caitlyn.florentine@umontana.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Harper</surname><given-names>Joel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fagre</surname><given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>Johnnie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Peitzsch</surname><given-names>Erich</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, West Glacier, Montana 59936, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Geosciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59801, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Caitlyn Florentine (caitlyn.florentine@umontana.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>2109</fpage><lpage>2122</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e125">Local topographically driven processes – such as wind drifting, avalanching,
and shading – are known to alter the relationship between the mass balance
of small cirque glaciers and regional climate. Yet partitioning such local
effects from regional climate influence has proven difficult, creating
uncertainty in the climate representativeness of some glaciers. We address
this problem for Sperry Glacier in Glacier National Park, USA, using
field-measured surface mass balance, geodetic constraints on mass balance,
and regional climate data recorded at a network of meteorological and snow
stations. Geodetically derived mass changes during 1950–1960, 1960–2005,
and 2005–2014 document average mass change rates during each period at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. A correlation of field-measured mass balance and regional
climate variables closely (i.e., within 0.08 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) predicts
the geodetically measured mass loss from 2005 to 2014. However, this
correlation overestimates glacier mass balance for 1950–1960 by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.95 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our analysis suggests that local
effects, not represented in regional climate variables, have become a more
dominant driver of the net mass balance as the glacier lost 0.50 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and retreated further into its cirque.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e238">Glaciers are sensitive indicators of climate (Dyurgerov and
Meier, 2000; Roe et al., 2017) because ice mass gains are ultimately
controlled by winter precipitation, and ice mass losses are ultimately
controlled by radiation and air temperature during summer. However, prior
studies of small (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) mountain glaciers, which are often
located in cirques, show that local topographic effects – including
avalanching, wind drifting, and shading – enhance winter mass gains or mediate
summer mass losses (e.g., Hock, 2003; Kuhn, 1995; Laha et al., 2017). These
topographically driven mass balance processes complicate the relationship
between regional climate and cirque glacier surface mass balance.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2110?><p id="d1e257">Such complications have been documented in high-relief areas worldwide.
Analysis from Montasio Occidentale Glacier in the Italian Julian Alps
demonstrated that avalanche-fed, shaded glaciers can exist at low elevations
otherwise climatically unsuitable for the persistence of glacier ice
(Carturan et al., 2013). Analysis from a network of on-ice automatic weather
stations on a cirque glacier in the French Pyrenees concluded that
topographic effects may exert more control on surface energy budgets – and
thereby melt – than regional lapse rates in air temperature and moisture
(Hannah et al., 2000). The small glaciers of the North American Rocky
Mountains have also been shown to have a disrupted, complex relationship to
regional climate. In Colorado, glacier mass balance at very small
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) glaciers showed no statistically significant correlation
to winter precipitation during the 20th century, suggesting that winter mass
inputs were not connected to regional winter precipitation in a
straightforward, linear manner (Hoffman et al., 2007). This result instead
implied the importance of processes driven by local topography, including
snow avalanching and wind drifting. In the Canadian Rockies, an inventory of
more than 1500 glaciers showed that,
while larger glaciers retreated during the last half of the 20th century,
very small glaciers did not change (DeBeer and Sharp, 2007). A follow-up
analysis showed that the stability of these very small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
glaciers was closely related to their topographically favorable setting
(DeBeer and Sharp, 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e292">Because local topography can substantially influence the mass balance of
small and sheltered mountain glaciers, it follows that, as glaciers retreat
further toward cirque headwalls, the direct control of regional climate on
glacier mass balance should diminish, and local processes should become more
influential (e.g., Haugen et al., 2010). That said, direct mass balance data
from Andrews Glacier, an east-facing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> glacier in Colorado,
exhibited a strong correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.93) between summer temperature
and net annual balance (Hoffman et al., 2007), despite enhanced accumulation
via wind drifting and avalanching during the winter: glacier mass losses
during summer outweighed the extra snow provided by topographically driven
snow redistribution. Mechanistically, this could be because Andrews Glacier
is small enough to have a diminished katabatic boundary layer at its surface,
leaving the glacier sensitive to ambient summer temperatures (Carturan et
al., 2015). Regardless, this example shows that regional climate can remain
the primary driver of net mass balance, even when local topography plays a
strong role.</p>
      <p id="d1e329">This paper examines the time evolution of the partitioning between regional
climate and local influences on glacier mass balance of a glacier retreating
into its cirque. Since 1966, Sperry Glacier, Montana, has reduced in area by
40 % and retreated 300 m (Fagre et al., 2017). We hypothesize that
during a recent interval (2005–2014), as a larger proportion of the glacier
surface has become sheltered by its cirque headwall, the relationship between
specific mass balance and regional climate is quantifiably distinct from that
during mid-century (1950–1960), when the glacier extended further downslope
from its cirque headwall. To test this hypothesis, we leverage a field-measured
(glaciological) surface mass balance record and repeat geodetic mass
balances.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e335"><bold>(a)</bold> Study area in the US Northern Rocky Mountains,
located just south of the USA–Canada border, as indicated by the red box on
the inset map. The 39 named glaciers within and near Glacier National Park
(GNP) are shown (blue). The continental divide (dashed black line), GNP
boundaries (solid black line), location of Sperry Glacier (small box),
Kalispell Historical Climate Network (HCN) meteorological station (black
triangle), and snow measurement sites (black circles) are also shown.
<bold>(b)</bold> WorldView imagery from 7 September 2014 depicts Sperry Glacier
with the 1950 (white line) and 2014 (black line) glacier margins shown. The
approximate seasonal snow line (dotted black line) and the main ridge that
defines the crest of the cirque headwall above Sperry Glacier, as well as the
west ridge which bounds Sperry Glacier (dotted white line), are also
depicted. Elevation (m) above sea level (a.s.l.) is represented by thin black
contour lines. Stakes where glaciological measurements were made are shown
(red), as is the Sperry Glacier meteorological station (black triangle).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e351">Sperry Glacier on 1 September 2009. Arrow points to the north. Note
low-sloping proglacial terrain. In 1950 and 1960, the glacier extended onto
this relatively flat ground. Gunsight Peak is indicated by the black star.
The west ridge, headwall, cornice, bergschrund, and moraines discussed in the
text are labeled. Photograph credit: USGS Climate Change in Mountain
Ecosystem photograph archives.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d1e366">Sperry Glacier (48.623<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>113.758<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) sits just west of
the continental divide, occupying a cirque that abuts the 2801 m high
Gunsight Peak, and is roughly in the center of Glacier National Park (GNP),
Montana (Fig. 1a). A bedrock headwall, crested by a ridgeline that runs 2 km
toward the northeast from Gunsight Peak (Fig. 1b), rises 100–300 m above
Sperry Glacier (Fig. 2). This headwall is 0.17 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in area and has
slopes from 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to near vertical. A sub-ridge extends 500 m
toward the north, bordering the glacier's western margin (labeled west ridge
in Fig. 1b). Between the headwall and this sub-ridge, Sperry Glacier has a
40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ramp extending to the top of Gunsight Peak, so that some ice
overlaps the ridge (Fig. 1b). A cornice that can be 10–20 m high develops
every winter along this topmost section of the glacier (Fig. 2). A
distinctive bergschrund separates the top 50–150 m of the glacier from the
main ice body (Fig. 2). The terrain in front of Sperry Glacier is relatively
low angle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Moraines located 1 km from the ice terminus
(Fig. 2) indicate that in the geologically recent past the glacier covered
most of a topographic bench now bare of ice. These moraines were<?pagebreak page2111?> likely
deposited when the glacier was at its Little Ice Age maximum extent (Carrara,
1989). Historical photographs and analysis from 1914 (Alden, 1914) show ice
once covered 3.24 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since that time Sperry Glacier has steadily
retreated, decreasing in area to 1.58 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1938 (Johnson, 1980) and
to 0.80 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2015 (Fagre et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Elevation data</title>
      <p id="d1e476">Modern digital elevation models (DEMs) of Sperry Glacier and adjacent terrain
were derived from national technical means imagery collected in 2005 and
DigitalGlobe WorldView imagery collected in 2014. These DEMs were generated
by Fahey (2014) and are the same data as used by Clark et al. (2017). Both
images were collected in September, when glacier mass is at an assumed annual
minimum, specifically on 2 September 2005 and 7 September 2014. The DEMs were
generated with SOCET SET<sup>®</sup> software, which
uses photogrammetric methods to extract terrain data from imagery (Zhang,
2006). Grid cell resolution was 5 m. The absolute accuracy of the DEM with
respect to an independent vertical datum was 3.05 m in the horizontal and
7.54 m in the vertical. The precision of the DEM was 0.44 and 0.47 m in the
horizontal and vertical, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e482">U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps at 6.1 m (20 ft) contour
resolution were available for Sperry Glacier for 1950 and 1960 (Johnson,
1980). These maps were originally created using aerial photography and Kelsh
plotter techniques, guided by 13 plane table benchmarks. Both maps document
elevation near the assumed September glacier mass minimum, on 1 September
1950 and 8 September 1960. We digitized these historic elevation data by
first manually tracing scanned maps to produce digitized contours and then
interpolating digitized contours using a natural neighbor interpolation tool
(ESRI, 2014; Sibson, 1981). Grid cell resolution was 5 m. We found that the
historic elevation data from the original Johnson maps from 1950 and 1960
were 56 m lower than the modern vertical datum due to the authors' sea level
datum assumption. We remedied this error by adding 56 m to the 1950 and 1960
DEMs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Geodetic mass balance and DEM co-registration</title>
      <p id="d1e491">The 1950 and 1960 DEMs did not require co-registration because they were
originally mapped using a common vertical datum and spatial reference frame.
We co-registered the 2005 and 2014, and the 1960 and 2005, DEMs following
universal co-registration methods outlined by Nuth and Kääb (2011).
The method used a statistical approach that minimized vertical differences
over stable (i.e., not prone to landslide/rockfall), vegetation-free,
snow-free, and low-sloping (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) bedrock (Fig. S1 in
Supplement). After co-registration, the root mean squared error of elevation
differences over stable bedrock improved from 8.43 to 6.91 m for the 1960
and 2005 DEMs, and from 2.48 to 2.01 m for the 2005 and 2014 DEMs. The mean
of bedrock elevation differences after co-registration was effectively zero,
i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, but differences over individual pixels still ranged
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>42 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>83 m for the 1960 and 2005 DEMs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 m for
the 2005 and 2014 DEMs (Fig. S2). These large differences tended to occur
over steep terrain and are included in our elevation error estimate.</p>
      <p id="d1e560">Glacier margin data for 2005 and 2014, used to clip DEMs to glacier extent,
were derived from aerial and satellite imagery (i.e., Fig. 1b) and
ground-based GPS surveys of the glacier terminus. We defined 1950 and 1960
glacier margin data by digitally tracing the glacier from the same historic
topographic maps by Johnson (1980).</p>
      <p id="d1e563">We generated a record of geodetic mass balance for Sperry Glacier, given by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the specific surface mass balance expressed in meters
water equivalent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the change in glacier volume (determined from
DEM data described in Sect. 3.1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of ice,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of water (1000 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the average of initial and final glacier area. To convert volume to mass, we
adopted the approximation outlined by Huss (2013) and assigned ice density as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">850</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2112?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Geodetic mass balance assessment</title>
      <p id="d1e708">There are three main sources of uncertainty in our geodetic mass balance
calculation: elevation errors that affect the volume calculation, density
errors which affect the volume to density conversion, and map coverage errors
that affect the historic geodetic mass balance.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Elevation change uncertainty</title>
      <p id="d1e716">After co-registering DEMs, elevation error on the geodetic mass balance was
estimated by analyzing elevation differences over stable bedrock terrain.
Because error tends to be greater over steep terrain at high elevations, we
analyzed error by a 50 m elevation band, rather than in bulk across the entire
DEM. The quantity of stable bedrock points varied from 14 472 in the lowest
elevation band to 1825 points in the highest elevation band. We used standard
error propagation, as applied in previous geodetic mass balance studies (Ruiz
et al., 2017; Thomson et al., 2017), given by

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M51" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dh</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean elevation error for a 50 m elevation band
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) that spans the glacier, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dh</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the standard deviation
of elevation differences over stable bedrock for the elevation band, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of independent values within the elevation
band. This in turn is given by

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M56" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of pixels (grid cells); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
pixel size; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the distance of spatial autocorrelation (100 m),
estimated from variogram analysis (Smith et al., 2018). We then summed
elevation error across the glacier surface, weighting the error by the ratio
of the glacier surface covering that elevation band.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e865">Elevation change over Sperry Glacier from
<bold>(a, b)</bold> 1950 to 1960, <bold>(c, d)</bold> 1960 to 2005, and
<bold>(e, f)</bold> 2005 to 2014. <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> show elevation change across
the glacier surface, and <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> show hypsometry of elevation
change. Black dots on the hypsometry figures <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> indicate
individual pixels, red dots indicate elevation band means, and horizontal red
bars indicate elevation band mean errors. Error is mostly smaller than, and
therefore obscured by, the red dot. The missing upper section is delineated
by the dotted line in <bold>(a, c)</bold>. Data from 2005 to 2014 were used to fill
in this missing section. These 2005–2014 infill data are indicated by the
gray dots in <bold>(b, d)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Density uncertainty</title>
      <p id="d1e905">We followed the convention outlined by Huss (2013) and used a constant
density of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">850</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to convert glacier
volume change to mass, which was derived from a suite of empirical firn
densification experiments and is appropriate for geodetic mass balance
calculations where the time intervals considered are longer than 5 years, the
volume change is nonzero, and the mass balance gradient is stable. These
conditions are satisfied for Sperry Glacier because (a) geodetic mass balance
periods are 10 years (1950–1960), 45 years (1960–2005), and 9 years
(2005–2014) long; (b) glacier volume changes were nonzero; and
(c) glaciological measurements show that mass balance gradients were
relatively constant during 2005–2014, i.e., 0.004–0.019 m w.e. m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for winter and 0.003–0.011 m w.e. m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for summer (Clark et
al., 2017). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> density error amounted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 %
error on geodetic mass balances.</p>
      <p id="d1e992">We assumed that elevation and density errors were independent and therefore
summed them quadratically to solve for the total error on the geodetic mass
balance, given by

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is elevation error, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is density error, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total error in meters water equivalent on the geodetic mass balance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Map coverage errors</title>
      <p id="d1e1070">The historic maps used to derive 1950 and 1960 DEMs are missing the upper
section of the glacier. Historic photos verify that in the mid-20th-century
Sperry Glacier extended to the top of Gunsight Peak, as it does today. To
enable consistent geodetic mass balance calculation for the entirety of
Sperry Glacier, we filled in elevation change over this missing section
(Fig. 3) using modern 2005–2014 results. We opted for this remedy, rather
than the alternative of truncating 2005–2014 data, in order to be consistent
with glaciological data, which were generated for the entire glacier surface
including the upper section. By using modern elevation change rate results to
infill missing historic data, we assumed that the rate of mass change in that
area near the cirque headwall was the same through the study interval
(1950–2014). Given that we had no way to test the validity of this
assumption, and to ensure it did not fundamentally alter geodetic mass
balance results, we also computed results for the truncated glacier
(Tables S1 and S2 in Supplement). The difference between the truncated and
infilled geodetic mass balance was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for both
1950–1960 and 1960–2005 (Table S2), which is less than the accounted-for
geodetic mass balance error (0.05 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1950–1960,
0.12 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1960–2005) (see Sect. 4.1). Infilling data for
the missing upper section therefore does not alter geodetic mass balance
results beyond the reported uncertainty bounds.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Glaciological mass balance</title>
      <p id="d1e1123">Sperry Glacier has been the focus of a USGS intensive glacier mass balance
monitoring program since 2005. Therefore, glaciological mass balance
measurements of seasonal mass gains and losses at Sperry Glacier are
available from the year 2005 onward (Clark et al., 2017). We used these data,
measured in the field according to standard mass balance protocols (Kaser et
al., 2003; Østrem and Brugman, 1991), to define specific, conventional
(Cogley et al., 2011) winter and summer glacier mass balance from 2005 to 2014.
We also analyzed point balance data collected along a longitudinal transect
(stakes in Fig. 1; data from Clark et al., 2017) to inspect mass balance
gradients at Sperry Glacier. To correct for bias in the raw, specific
glaciological balances reported by Clark et al. (2017), we performed
calibration as outlined by Zemp et al. (2013). The results of this
calibration, which utilized the<?pagebreak page2113?> 2005–2014 geodetic mass balance calculated
in this study to correct the absolute magnitude of annual and summer
glaciological balances without losing seasonal/annual variability (Zemp et
al., 2013), are reported in Table 1. Such calibration ensures that systematic
errors in the glaciological method are rectified and that englacial and subglacial
mass changes not measured at surface stakes are accounted for. Details on this
calibration are provided in the Supplement.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e1129">Area-averaged glaciological mass balance values used in this study.
Winter balances are as reported by Clark et al. (2017). Summer and annual
balances are the result of calibration against the 2005–2014 geodetic mass
balance, accomplished following the calibration steps outlined by Zemp et
al. (2013). Accumulation area ratio (AAR) as reported by Clark et al. (2017)
is listed for years when the seasonal snow line was mapped.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Summer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Annual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AAR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">balance</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">balance</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">balance</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">(m w.e.) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">46 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Mass balance and climate regressions</title>
      <p id="d1e1565">Employing annual glaciological measurements (Clark et al., 2017), we defined
a functional relationship (i.e., linear regression) between 2005–2014
specific surface mass balance and regional climate. Regional climate was
defined by data on winter peak snow water equivalent (SWE) and summer
positive degree days (PDDs). Climate data from 2005 to 2014 were used to define
the regressions, and climate data from 1950 to 2005 were used to apply the
regressions back in time.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS1">
  <title>Meteorological and snow data</title>
      <p id="d1e1573">The Global Historical Climatology Network provides historic temperature data
for Kalispell, Montana, located approximately 50 km southwest of Sperry
Glacier (Fig. 1). There are closer meteorological stations, but these had
short and incomplete records. For example, average daily temperatures were
recorded at Sperry Glacier for most (83 %) summer days from 2005 to 2013
(Baker et al., 2018). To assess the representativeness of Kalispell
temperature data relative to the glacier site, we compared this shorter,
discontinuous record with the longer, continuous Kalispell record.
Temperatures measured at Kalispell are highly<?pagebreak page2114?> representative of regional
climate as reflected by gridded values from North American Regional
Reanalysis output (Fig. S3a). Kalispell is located at an elevation of 901 m,
which is 1554 m lower than the average elevation across Sperry Glacier in
2005–2014. We therefore applied a lapse rate correction of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated using 7 years of temperature
measurements from a meteorological station at Sperry Glacier (Fig. 1b), to
correct for the elevation difference. Comparison of lapse-rate-corrected
temperatures derived from the Kalispell meteorological station with the
7-year record of in situ July, August, and September temperatures measured at the
Sperry Glacier meteorological station (Fig. 1b) yielded no statistically
significant difference at the 99 % confidence interval (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
and the distribution of residuals was normal.</p>
      <p id="d1e1618">The Kalispell record reports continuous daily average air temperatures back
to 1950 for the melt season summer months. We follow the convention defined
by previous GNP melt modeling (Clark et al., 2017) and confine the Sperry
Glacier melt season to July, August, and September. Glaciological
observations suggest that, although May and June can be warm enough to
generate melt at Sperry Glacier, the deep snowpack is not necessarily warmed
with pore space filled to saturation, and therefore melt does not necessarily
run off the glacier.</p>
      <p id="d1e1621">Because the glacier terminus increased in elevation from 1950 to 2014, the
surface of Sperry Glacier was on average 35 m lower in elevation during
1950–1960 and 21 m lower in elevation during 1960–2005. We accounted for
these changes in elevation by adjusting the lapse rate correction accordingly
for each time period. The effect of this accounting was small, resulting in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.16 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C changes to average summer temperature, and
cumulatively <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C day changes to PDDs. Ultimately,
correcting for elevation changes at Sperry Glacier corresponded to centimeter-scale
changes to the mass balance regression.</p>
      <p id="d1e1671">Data from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at five nearby snow
course sites (Desert Mountain, 1707 m; Piegan Pass, 1676 m; Marias Pass,
1600 m; Mount Allen, 1737 m; and Mineral Creek, 1219 m) and one adjacent
Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL) site (Flattop Mountain, 1921 m) provide SWE data for
locations within a 50 km radius of Sperry Glacier (Fig. 1a). Temperature
data are also recorded at the Flattop Mountain site. SWE is recorded monthly
at snow course sites, via manual measurement, whereas SWE is recorded daily
at SNOTEL sites via transducer measurements from a snow pillow. The
1950–2014 period is long enough to encompass meso-scale changes in
atmospheric flow patterns, which elsewhere have been shown to have an
important impact on winter accumulation and glacier mass balance (e.g., Huss
et al., 2010). The peak SWE data we analyzed have been shown to reflect such
meso-scale, decadal shifts in snow (McCabe and Dettinger, 2002; Pederson et
al., 2011; Selkowitz et al., 2002).</p>
      <p id="d1e1675">Based on an analysis of the historical snow data from the region against
observations from Sperry Glacier, we chose to use Mount Allen snow data for
our mass balance regression. We found high correlation coefficients
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.939</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each of the seven datasets analyzed (Table S3). The
highest correlation was with Flattop Mountain SNOTEL (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.990</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but
at this station consistent snow data only go back to 1970. The second-highest
correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.973</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), for a snow record that started prior to 1950
and so encompassed the geodetic record, was Mount Allen.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1732">Digital elevation model (DEM) specifications and glacier elevation
results. Acquisition dates for the original imagery used to derive elevation
data are listed.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DEM source</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">elevation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">slope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">aspect</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1 September 1950</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">USGS topographic map <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2317</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">315 NNW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8 September 1960</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">USGS topographic map <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2325</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">315 NNW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2 September 2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">National technical means imagery</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2425</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">326 NW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7 September 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DigitalGlobe WorldView imagery</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2444</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">326 NW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS2">
  <title>Regression analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1966">To quantify the glacier–climate relationship for 2005–2014, we fit a linear
regression between 2005–2014 climate data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: PDD, SWE) and glaciological
mass balance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) data. We forced the
best-fit line through the origin so that zero PDD and zero SWE equated to
zero melt and zero accumulation, respectively. The linear combination of the
two seasonal linear equations was thus

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M127" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>PDD</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>SWE</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the specific annual balance; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
summer proportionality factor; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the winter proportionality
factor, PDD is summer positive degree days, i.e., the sum of the average
temperatures of days above 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C during the melt season; and SWE is
peak winter snow water equivalent. We solved for the proportionality factors
using an ordinary least squares, one-parameter linear regression.</p>
      <p id="d1e2082">The linear regression only provides a best estimate of the mass balance of
Sperry Glacier. To discern how dependable this estimate was, we considered
the 95 % confidence interval on each seasonal linear regression. Knowing
that the<?pagebreak page2115?> true proportionality factor (i.e., slope of the best-fit line) fell
somewhere within the upper and lower bounds, we used the upper and lower
confidence intervals to compute maximum and minimum possible mass balances.
This accounting accommodated uncertainty due to (a) the discrepancy between
snow and meteorological station locations and Sperry Glacier; (b) assuming
that seasonal melt is largely driven by net available shortwave radiation and
that PDD is a reasonable proxy for this; and (c) assuming that the summer
melt season is limited to July, August, and September (JAS). To test the
sensitivity of our results to this last assumption, we computed a summer
linear regression using May, June, July, August, and September (MJJAS) PDDs.
Ultimately, the median difference between mass balance values produced by the
MJJAS versus JAS regressions was just 0.04 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2097">The linear regression quantifies the 2005–2014 relationship between Sperry
Glacier and regional climate, and is fixed with respect to this time. Yet we
have hypothesized that this relationship changed as the glacier retreated. By
fixing the proportionality factors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the
modern glacier–climate relationship and then forcing this modern regression
with historic climate data, we test our hypothesis that the glacier–climate
relationship changed as the glacier retreated.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Shading, avalanching, and wind drifting</title>
      <p id="d1e2129">Attributing the hypothesized change in the glacier–climate relationship to
the increasing influence of local topographic effects requires inspection of
topographically influenced processes at Sperry Glacier. To assess topographic
shading, we used the Solar Area Radiation tool (ESRI, 2014) to calculate
cumulative insolation received across Sperry Glacier during the melt season
months of July, August, and September in 2014 – when the glacier was smaller,
steeper, and more shaded – versus 1950, when the glacier was larger, flatter,
and less shaded. This hemispherical viewshed algorithm (Fu and Rich, 2002)
calculated radiation based on an upward-looking sky map for every grid cell
within our 2014 DEM, the seasonal progression of the position of the sun
relative to Earth, a fixed atmospheric transmissivity, topographic shading,
latitude, elevation, slope, and aspect. To qualitatively assess avalanching
and wind-drifting snow processes, we examined field observations, historic
photographs, and field-measured mass balance data collected by Clark et
al. (2017).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Retreat, thinning, and negative mass balance</title>
      <p id="d1e2144">Sperry Glacier has decreased from 1.30 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1950, to 1.23 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in 1960, to 0.86 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2005, to 0.80 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2014 (Table 2).
During the mid-20th century the glacier extended onto relatively flat
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> slope) bedrock terrain; therefore the lower portion of the
glacier was relatively low angle. As a result, between 1950 and 2014, despite
nearly 0.5 km of retreat, the glacier terminus only receded upward by 56 m
in elevation. The loss of this northwest-oriented, low-sloping terminus
resulted in a steepening of the glacier's median slope by 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a
rotation of the glacier's median aspect toward the north by 11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2218">Elevation change across the glacier surface is generally similar in its
spatial pattern, but not magnitude, during 1950–1960, 1960–2005, and
2005–2014 (Fig. 3a, c, e). Thinning occurred across the lower portion but
was most pronounced at the terminus. The upper elevations of the glacier
thickened from 1960 to 2005 and from 2005 to 2014, but at rates less than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3). The magnitude of thinning near the terminus is
distinct for each period. Terminus thinning rates from 1950 to 1960 were up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.5 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3b), whereas terminus thinning rates from
1960 to 2005 (Fig. 3d) and from 2005 to 2014 (Fig. 3f) were smaller than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. No development of debris cover at the glacier terminus
that might explain this decreased thinning rate is evident. The magnitude of
thickening was likewise distinct between periods, with 1950–1960 showing a
bulge near the glacier's middle (approximately 2500 m), growing at nearly
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3b).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2301">Geodetic mass balance results. Net changes in volume (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on Sperry Glacier from 1950 to 1960, 1960 to 2005, and
2005 to 2014 are listed. Uncertainties due to elevation error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are listed, as are total errors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Geodetic
mass balances (d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are listed with uncertainty defined by total
error, expressed as a rate.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Net volume  change</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Net mass change</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Elevation error</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Density error</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Total error</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Geodetic mass balance</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m w.e.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(m w.e.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(m w.e.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1950–1960</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1960–2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2005–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2738">Ordinary least squares (OLS) linear regressions between climate data
and glaciological mass balance for 2005–2014. <bold>(a)</bold> Summer (i.e.,
July, August, and September: JAS) positive degree days versus summer mass
balance. The linear regression is shown in red text and is plotted (solid red
line). The 95 % confidence interval on the regression is also shown
(dotted red lines). <bold>(b)</bold> Peak snow water equivalent (SWE) versus
winter mass balance. SWE data are from the Mount Allen snow course. The
linear regression is shown in blue text and is plotted (sold blue line). The
95 % confidence interval on the regression is also shown (dotted blue
lines).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2753">Despite differences in the magnitude of elevation change, the hypsometry of
the glacier remained similar in 1950, 1960, 2005, and 2014. Sperry Glacier
lost 50 m of ice at the glacier terminus during the 1960–2005 interval,
which agrees with the average amount of thinning (52.4 m) reported for
glaciers in the Canadian Rockies for the same period (Clarke et al., 2017).
Commensurate with its area<?pagebreak page2116?> loss and thinning, the glacier also lost volume.
Geodetic mass balance results show Sperry Glacier shrank by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1950 to 1960,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1960 to 2005, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2005 to 2014 (Table 3). It lost
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg of mass from 1950 to 1960,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg from 1960 to 2005, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg
from 2005 to 2014 (Table 1). The rate of mass change at Sperry Glacier was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1950 to 1960,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1960 to 2005, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2005 to 2014 (Table 3). The
glacier is near balance but slightly losing mass.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Glacier–climate relationship</title>
      <p id="d1e2997">Linear regressions show strong (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), statistically significant
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) correlation between climate and glaciological data (Fig. 4).
The model therefore effectively defines a functional relationship between
glacier mass balance and regional climate for 2005–2014. The regressions
correlate warmer summers with more negative summer mass balance
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.978</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and snowier winters with more positive winter mass balance
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.973</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). From the regression results, the proportionality factor
for winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which scales snow course data on peak SWE to
winter glaciological measurements, is 2.99. The proportionality factor for
summer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which scales meteorological data on PDDs to summer
glaciological measurements, is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.004 m w.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3128">We used climate data to apply the linear regression back in time to 1950
(Fig. 5). Average PDD during 1950–1960 was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">709</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C day,
which was virtually the same as average PDD during 1960–2005
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">717</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C day). Summer PDD then showed a
41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C day increase to an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">758</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C day
during 2005–2014, although this increase was well within interannual
variability. Snow data show that, on average, SWE decreased from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.31</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m w.e. in 1950–1960, to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.08</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m w.e. in
1960–2005, to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m w.e. in 2005–2014, although these step
decreases are likewise within the range of interannual variability. The step
change in peak SWE during the mid-1970s is consistent with other regional SWE
records (Fig. S3b) and has been interpreted as a result of a modal change in
the Pacific decadal oscillation, a pattern of ocean climate variability which
is closely tied to peak SWE in this region (McCabe and Dettinger, 2002;
Pederson et al., 2011; Selkowitz et al., 2002). Generally, PDD and SWE in
1950–1960 compared to 2005–2014 seem to differ.<?pagebreak page2117?> To quantitatively assess
the difference, we performed simple <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> tests. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test results showed that
the lower (higher) average SWE (PDD) during 2005–2014 differed statistically
from 1950–1960 SWE (PDD) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This evidence supports the notion that 2005–2014 had
relatively dry winters and warm summers compared to 1950–1960.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e3321">Annual climate data for 1950–2014 and comparison of regression and
geodetic mass balance results. <bold>(a)</bold> Positive degree days (PDDs)
calculated from the Kalispell Historical Climate Network summer (i.e., July,
August, and September: JAS) temperature data, adjusted for elevation by the
standard lapse rate. <bold>(b)</bold> Peak snow water equivalent (SWE),
calculated from Mount Allen snow course data. Mean (solid line) and 1
standard deviation (dashed line) of PDD and SWE for each geodetic mass
balance interval (1950–1960, 1960–2005, 2005–2014) are plotted and
reported in text with standard deviation. <bold>(c)</bold> Regression results for
annual mass balance (black dots, thin black line) are shown, as are
regression results for the average mass balance from 1950 to 1960, 1960 to 2005,
and 2005 to 2014 (black dotted lines). Calibrated annual glaciological balances
are shown (red dots), as is the average of this glaciological balance from
2005 to 2014 (red dotted line). Errors, set by confidence intervals on the
linear regression, are also shown (light gray boxes). Geodetic mass balances
for 1950–1960, 1960–2005, and 2005–2014 are plotted (horizontal black
lines) with errors (dark gray boxes).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3342">Snow avalanches and wind-drifted snow at Sperry Glacier.
<bold>(a)</bold> Aerial photograph of Sperry Glacier taken on 8 September 1960
showing a prominent ridge of wind-drifted snow, which is evidence of southwest
winds in the basin (black arrows), is shown. The cornice that is evidence of
south winds (red arrows) is labeled. Sperry Glacier meteorological station is
shown (red triangle), and the approximate elevation (2475 m a.s.l.) above
which the winter and summer mass balance gradients change is drawn. The
photograph also shows the glacier lapping over the top of Gunsight Peak
(black star) at the highest elevation of the ridge (dotted white line).
Photograph credit: USGS Climate Change in Mountain Ecosystem photograph
archives. <bold>(b)</bold> Sperry Glacier in June 2010. Snow sluffing and loose
avalanches off the headwall are depicted. Photograph was taken from the
Sperry Glacier meteorological station, labeled “b” in <bold>(a)</bold>.
Photograph credit: Joel Harper. <bold>(c)</bold> Sperry Glacier in June 2006.
Cornice collapse (on the left) often causes a localized slab avalanche. Loose
avalanche depicted on the right. Photograph credit: USGS Climate Change in
Mountain Ecosystem photograph archives. Photograph was taken from the
approximate location labeled “c” in <bold>(a)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3368">Parsing local from regional mass balance drivers.
<bold>(a)</bold> Hypsometry of the 1950 glacier, presented in 50 m elevation
bands (black bars). <bold>(b)</bold> Sperry Glacier hypothetical mass balance, as
it varies with elevation, given 1950 glacier hypsometry and mass balance
gradients. Solid lines show the summer (red), winter (blue), and annual
(black) balances calculated using field-measured local (L) and regional (R)
mass balance gradients shown in <bold>(c)</bold>. Dotted black lines show the
same but excluding L at high elevations, i.e., using R only.
<bold>(c)</bold> Hypsometry of the 2014 glacier surface (black bars), and mass
balance gradients measured at Sperry Glacier (red and blue dots and lines).
The means of 2005–2014 summer (red dots) and winter (blue dots) point mass
balances, measured at stakes sites, are plotted against the average elevation
of the 50 m elevation band wherein the stake was located. Lower-elevation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2475 m) mass balance gradients reflect regional (R) mass balance
gradients for melt (dashed red line) and snow water equivalent (SWE) (dashed
blue line). Higher-elevation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2475 m) mass balance gradients reflect
local (L) mass balance gradients for melt (dotted red line) and SWE (dotted
blue line). <bold>(d)</bold> Sperry Glacier hypothetical mass balance as shown
in <bold>(b)</bold>, but given 2014 glacier hypsometry.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/2109/2018/tc-12-2109-2018-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3410">Nevertheless, geodetic results show that average mass change rates at Sperry
Glacier for 2005–2014 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
1950–1960 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were comparable, i.e.,
within error bounds. This differs drastically from mass balance results
derived from the regression, which include many years of net mass gain during
the mid-20th century (Fig. 5). Sufficient individual years are positive
during the mid-20th century to yield positive averages from 1950 to 1960 and
from 1960 to 2005, at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.83 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. However, confidence
intervals from the linear regression model suggest the possibility of a
negative average during 1960–2005. Conversely, error on the 1950–1960 mass
balance include only positive averages, i.e., glacier thickening and mass
gain. The 1950–1960 mass gain predicted by the regression
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.83 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is distinctly at odds with the
1950–1960 geodetic mass balance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Local controls on surface mass balance</title>
      <p id="d1e3568">The amount of potential clear-sky radiation available for specific summer
melt at Sperry Glacier decreased by 118 605 kJ m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (approximately
15 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from 1950 to 2014, likely due to steepening of the glacier
surface and a greater proportion of the glacier becoming shaded. Given the
heat of fusion for ice (334 J g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), this energy deficit translates to
0.36 m w.e. less potential melt for the summer melt season averaged over
the entire glacier, driven only by changes in the relative influence of local
effects (i.e., shading, steepening), independent of climate. Field
observations show that the rock headwall extending above Sperry Glacier
(Fig. 2) contributes high-frequency, low-volume, loose avalanches (Fig. 6b),
and that the cornice above the bergschrund often breaks in the spring,
subsequently triggering localized slab avalanches that extend 500 m down
from the crest of the ridge to an elevation of 2460 m. (Fig. 6c). Historic
aerial photographs show that a prominent ridge of wind-drifted snow
consistently develops at lower elevations in the basin (Fig. 6a).
Field-measured mass balance data showing highly variable snow accumulation
provide evidence of wind effects. Accumulation ranges from 0.00 m w.e. in
wind-scoured areas, where seasonal snowpack had been stripped down to bare
ice, up to more than 5 m w.e. in wind-loaded areas (Clark et al., 2017).</p>
      <?pagebreak page2118?><p id="d1e3607">Field-measured point data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">551</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), taken along stakes from the terminus
toward the headwall of the glacier (Clark et al., 2017), show the impact of
these local effects (shading, avalanching, wind drifting) on the mass balance
elevation gradient (Fig. 7c). Toward the glacier terminus, at elevations
lower than 2475 m, the mass balance gradient of winter accumulation is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m w.e. (m)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Toward the glacier head, at
elevations above 2475 m, the mass balance gradient of winter accumulation is
an order of magnitude higher at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m w.e. (m)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The elevation gradients shown by summer ablation measurements show a similar
inflection (Fig. 7c). At elevations higher than 2475 m, where the glacier is
steeper and more shaded, the melt gradient rate increases 8-fold from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m w.e. (m)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3749">Our results reveal that the drivers of mass balance at Sperry Glacier evolved
as the glacier retreated. Specifically, the strong correlation between
modern-era field and climate data poorly predicts the 1950–1960 geodetically
derived mass balance (Fig. 5c) and documents a change in the relationship
between regional climate and rates of ice mass loss.</p>
      <p id="d1e3752">It seems that Sperry Glacier became less reflective of the regional climate
as it retreated. Geodetic results compared to regional climate data show that
Sperry Glacier lost less area-averaged mass from 2005 to 2014
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than from 1950 to 1960
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 m w.e. yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> despite the 2005–2014 period
being characterized by warmer summers and lower-precipitation winters.
Glacier elevation changes reflect both surface mass balance and ice flow
processes (Cuffey and Patterson, 2010). However, if we were to attribute
geodetic results solely to surface mass balance, then our results (Fig. 3)
would suggest that the equilibrium line altitude remained relatively constant from
1950 to 2014 despite climate warming. Thus as Sperry Glacier retreated, its
accumulation area ratio (Cogley et al., 2011) increased. With an increased
fraction of the glacier remaining snow-covered throughout the melt season,
the average glacier albedo increases (Naegeli and Huss, 2017). Such time
changes in glacier albedo must have affected the summer proportionality
factor, i.e., the amount of area-averaged melt relative to regional summer
temperature, which in part explains the discrepancy between the linear
regression and the 1950–1960 mass balance (Fig. 5c).</p>
      <?pagebreak page2119?><p id="d1e3811">We had hypothesized that the discrepancy between the regression and the
historic mass balance would be attributable to avalanching, wind drifting,
and shading becoming relatively more influential as the glacier retreated.
Glaciological measurements provide direct evidence of these effects, as the
mass balance gradient at Sperry Glacier has two distinct components
reflecting regional and local drivers (Fig. 7c). For example, the winter mass
balance gradient at elevations below 2475 m,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m w.e. (m)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, falls within the range of
regional SWE lapse rates, 6.2–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m w.e. (m)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
reported in a study of snow accumulation in northwest Montana (Gillan et
al., 2010). The stark increase (to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m w.e. (m)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in winter mass balance gradient
at higher elevations is consistent with enhanced snow accumulation reported
for so-called “drift” glaciers located below the regional equilibrium line
altitude in Colorado, where winter accumulation from local effects was
4–8 times regional snow accumulation (Outcalt and MacPhail, 1965).
Field-measured summer data at high elevations are sparse, but these summer
point balances also show a sudden steepening of the summer mass balance
gradient above 2475 m (Fig. 7c), likely because these high reaches of the
glacier are shaded by the headwall.</p>
      <p id="d1e3911">Our linear regression results fall short of elucidating what drove the change
in the relationship between climate variables and Sperry Glacier. Therefore,
we used glaciological measurements in one final, complementary analysis to
assess the impact of the time-changing glacier hypsometry and the local and
regional mass balance gradients on the glacier's total mass balance. We
applied field-measured mass balance gradients to the hypsometry of Sperry
Glacier in 2014 and 1950 (Fig. 7a, b black bars), first using only the
regional gradient (Fig. 7c dotted lines) and then using the regional plus
local gradients (Fig. 7c solid lines). This demonstrates that without local
effects, given the 1950 glacier hypsometry, specific surface mass balance
would be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.04 m w.e. Similarly, without local effects, given the 2014
glacier hypsometry, specific surface mass balance would be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.96 m w.e.
Thus, in theory, the hypothetical mass balance response of the 1950 and 2014
glaciers would be roughly similar when forced only by regionally determined
gradients. However, when the local mass balance gradients are applied, the
balance for 1950 increases by 37 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.66 m w.e., and for 2014 by
57 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.41 m w.e. These results demonstrate that local mass
balance processes have apparently played a strong role at Sperry Glacier
since 1950, and that role strengthened as the glacier retreated.</p>
      <p id="d1e3943">The impact of topographic effects is not evenly partitioned between seasonal
components. The differences between the solid and dotted lines in Fig. 7b
and d illustrate local effects: suppression of summer melt (light red area),
surplus in winter accumulation (light blue area), and net mass balance
enhancement (light gray area). We find that winter local effects (i.e., the
surplus in winter accumulation due to avalanching and wind loading) account
for 79 % of the discrepancy between the mass balance defined by regional
mass balance gradients alone and that defined by both regional and local
gradients. Summer local effects (i.e., the mediation in summer melt due to
shading) accounted for 21 % of the discrepancy. This analysis supports
the interpretation that the altered mass balance response we have documented,
wherein the glacier had a less negative balance in 2005–2014 despite less
favorable regional climate conditions, is driven by the increasing influence
of local effects rather than just the<?pagebreak page2120?> changing glacier hypsometry. Here we
have examined the time evolution of local effects in bulk. To quantitatively
partition the mass impact of discrete processes, future work could assess the
evolution in geographic parameters for wind (e.g., Winstral et al., 2002) and
avalanche (e.g., Carturan et al., 2013) effects.</p>
      <p id="d1e3946">Sperry Glacier's increasing sensitivity to local mass balance drivers is
consistent with studies of 20th-century glacier change elsewhere in the Rocky
Mountains (DeBeer and Sharp, 2009) and is commensurate with modeled
projections of future changes to cirque glaciers in the Swiss Alps. For
example, although 25 % of 1133 individual very small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
glaciers are projected to disappear as soon as the next 25 years, 67 glaciers
(6 %) are projected to maintain more than half of their area through at
least 2050 (Huss and Fischer, 2016). The persistence of these select
glaciers, which are located at lower elevation than the regional equilibrium
line altitude, signals the sometimes strong influence of local mass balance
drivers. Despite local effects allowing some glaciers to persist for a few
more decades, categorical evidence of worldwide glacier retreat in response
to 20th-century warming (Roe et al., 2017) suggests that local mass balance
drivers do not interrupt the synchronicity of glacier response to climate
change on global, century-long scales. Indeed, very small
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) glaciers in Colorado showed a strong annual mass balance
response to 20th-century summer temperatures despite being heavily influenced
by winter topographic effects (Hoffman et al., 2007). Thus, the evolving
relationship between climate and mass balance demonstrated by Sperry Glacier
reveals the complexity in interpreting glacier changes in Glacier National
Park and at small cirque glaciers elsewhere on Earth, but it does not preclude
the reality of a climate that is trending toward conditions that mandate
glacier disappearance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e3987">Analysis of a 64-year record of glacier mass change
against meteorological and snow data demonstrates that the relationship
between regional climate variables and Sperry Glacier is evolving over
time. By assessing geodetic mass measurements, regional climate data, and
field-measured mass balance, we deduced that this shift was caused by local
drivers related to topography becoming increasingly influential as the cirque
glacier retreated. Our results therefore emphasize the importance of
accounting for spatially complex, local topographic processes in projections
of 21st-century mountain glacier change. These effects can exert substantial
and time-changing control on the mass balance of retreating cirque glaciers,
are likely highly variable from glacier to glacier, and must therefore be
carefully considered and treated in interpretations and projections of cirque
glacier change.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e3995">Temperature data from the Kalispell Historical Climate
Network site are available at
<uri>https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/land-based-station-data/land-based-datasets/us-historical-climatology-network-ushcn</uri>
(last access: 17 January 2018). Temperature data from the Sperry Glacier
meteorological station are available at
<uri>https://doi.org/10.5066/F7BG2N8R</uri> (Baker et al., 2018) in version 2.1.
Snow data analyzed in this study are available at
<uri>https://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/snow/</uri> (last access: 11 August 2018),
which also has the temperature data for the SNOTEL site at Flattop Mountain.
North American Regional Reanalysis data analyzed in this study were provided
by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their website
<uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/</uri> (last access: 25 April 2018).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4010">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2109-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2109-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e4019">CF and JH designed the analytical approach, which CF then carried out with
input from DF, JM, and EP. CF prepared the manuscript with contributions
from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e4025">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer">

      <p id="d1e4031">Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only
and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4037">This work was funded by the Climate and Land Use Change mission area of the
U.S. Geological Survey. Caitlyn Florentine received funding from the Jerry O'Neal National
Park Service Student Fellowship.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Tobias Sauter <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alden, C.: Glaciers of Glacier National Park, Department of the Interior,
Washington, D.C., USA, 48 pp., 1914.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Baker, E. H., O'Neel, S., Fagre, D. B., Whorton, E. N., Sass, L. C., McNeil,
C. J., Peitzsch, E. H., Clark, A. M., Florentine, C. E., and McGrath, D.:
USGS Benchmark Glacier Mass Balance and Project Data: 1966–2016, U.S.
Geological Survey data release, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5066/F7BG2N8R" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5066/F7BG2N8R</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Carrara, P. E.: Late Quaternary Glacial and Vegetative History of the
Glacier National Park Region, Montana, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1902,
U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington D.C., 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Carturan, L., Baldassi, G. A., Bondesan, A., Calligaro, S., Carton, A.,
Cazorzi, F., Dalla Fontana, G., Francese, R., Guarnieri, A., Milan, N., Moro,
D., and Tarolli, P.: Current Behaviour and Dynamics of the Lowermost Italian
Glacier (Montasio Occidentale, Julian Alps), Geogr. Ann. A, 95, 79–96,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/geoa.12002</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Carturan, L., Cazorzi, F., De Blasi, F., and Dalla Fontana, G.: Air
temperature variability over three glaciers in the Ortles–Cevedale (Italian
Alps): effects of glacier fragmentation, comparison of calculation methods,
and impacts on mass balance modeling, The Cryosphere, 9, 1129–1146,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1129-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-1129-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Clark, A. M., Fagre, D. B., Peitzsch, E. H., Reardon, B. A., and Harper, J.
T.: Glaciological measurements and mass balances from Sperry Glacier,
Montana, USA, years 2005–2015, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 47–61,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-47-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-47-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Cogley, J. G., Hock, R., Rassmussen, L. A., Arendt, A. A., Bauder, A.,
Braithwaite, R. J., Jansson, P., Kaser, G., Moller, M., Nicholson, L., and
Zemp, M.: Glossary of mass balance and related terms, IHP-VII Technical
Documents in Hydrology No. 86, IACS Contribution No. 2, UNESCO-IHP, Paris.,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cuffey, K. M. and Patterson, W. S. B.: The Physics of Glaciers, 4th edn.,
Elsevier, Oxford, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>DeBeer, C. M. and Sharp, M. J.: Recent changes in glacier area and volume
within the southern Canadian Cordillera, Ann. Glaciol., 46, 215–221,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756407782871710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756407782871710</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>DeBeer, C. M. and Sharp, M. J.: Topographic influences on recent changes of
very small glaciers in the monashee mountains, British Columbia, Canada,
J. Glaciol., 55, 691–700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309789470851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/002214309789470851</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dyurgerov, M. B. and Meier, M. F.: Twentieth century climate change: Evidence
from small glaciers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 1406–1411, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
ESRI: ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.3.1, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fagre, D. B., McKeon, L. A., Dick, L. A., and Fountain, A. G.: Glacier margin
time series (1966, 1998, 2005, 2015) of the named glaciers of Glacier
National Park, MT, USA, U.S. Geol. Surv. data release, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Fahey, M.: National Civil Applications Program, U.S. Geological Survey,
Reston, VA, USA, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Fu, P. and Rich, P. M.: A geometric solar radiation model with applications
in agriculture and forestry, Comput. Electron. Agr., 37, 25–35,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00115-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00115-1</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Gillan, B. J., Harper, J. T., and Moore, J. N.: Timing of present and future
snowmelt from high elevations in northwest Montana, Water Resour. Res., 46,
W01507, doi:10.1029/2009WR007861, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hannah, D. M., Gurnell, A. M., and McGregor, G. R.: Spatio-temporal variation
in microclimate, the surface energy balance and ablation over a cirque
glacier, Int. J. Climatol., 20, 733–758,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0088(20000615)20:7&lt;733::AID-JOC490&gt;3.0.CO;2-F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/1097-0088(20000615)20:7&lt;733::AID-JOC490&gt;3.0.CO;2-F</ext-link>,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Haugen, B. D., Scambos, T. A., Pfeffer, W. T., and Anderson, R. S.:
Twentieth-century Changes in the Thickness and Extent of Arapaho Glacier,
Front Range, Colorado, Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 42, 198–209,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-42.2.198" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1657/1938-4246-42.2.198</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hock, R.: Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas, J. Hydrol.,
282, 104–115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00257-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00257-9</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Hoffman, M. J., Fountain, A. G., and Achuff, J. M.: 20th-century variations
in area of cirque glaciers and glacierets, Rocky Mountain National Park,
Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USA, Ann. Glaciol., 46, 349–354,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756407782871233" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756407782871233</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Huss, M.: Density assumptions for converting geodetic glacier volume change
to mass change, The Cryosphere, 7, 877–887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-877-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-877-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Huss, M. and Fischer, M.: Sensitivity of Very Small Glaciers in the Swiss
Alps to Future Climate Change, Front. Earth Sci., 4, 34,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2016.00034</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Huss, M., Hock, R., Bauder, A., and Funk, M.: 100-year mass changes in the
Swiss Alps linked to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 37, L10501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL042616</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, A.: Grinnell and Sperry Glaciers, Glacier National Park, Montana: A
record of vanishing ice, Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep., 1180, 1–29, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Kaser, G., Fountain, A., Jansson, P., Heucke, E., and Knaus, M.: A manual for
monitoring the mass balance of mountain glaciers, UNESCO, 137 pp., 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhn, M.: The mass balance of very small glaciers, Zeitschrift für
Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie, 31, 171–179, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Laha, S., Kumari, R., Singh, S., Mishra, A., Sharma, T., Banerjee, A.,
Nainwal, H. C., and Shankar, R.: Evaluating the contribution of avalanching
to the mass balance of Himalayan glaciers, Ann. Glaciol., 58, 110–118,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2017.27" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2017.27</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>McCabe, G. J. and Dettinger, M. D.: Primary Modes and Predictability of
Year-to-Year Snowpack Variations in the Western United States from
Teleconnections with Pacific Ocean Climate, J. Hydrometeorol., 3, 13–25,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0013:PMAPOY&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0013:PMAPOY&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Naegeli, K. and Huss, M.: Sensitivity of mountain glacier mass balance to
changes in bare-ice albedo, Ann. Glaciol., 58, 119–129,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2017.25" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/aog.2017.25</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Nuth, C. and Kääb, A.: Co-registration and bias corrections of
satellite elevation data sets for quantifying glacier thickness change, The
Cryosphere, 5, 271–290, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-271-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-5-271-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Østrem, G. and Brugman, M.: Glacier Mass Balance Measurements: A Manual
for Field and Office Work, Minister of Supply and Services, Environment
Canada and Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Administration, 224 pp.,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Outcalt, S. J. and MacPhail, D. D.: A survey of Neoglaciation in the Front
Range of Colorado, University of Colorado Press, Boulder, CO, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Pederson, G. T., Gray, S. T., Ault, T., Marsh, W., Fagre, D. B., Bunn, A. G.,
Woodhouse, C. A., and Graumlich, L. J.: Climatic controls on the snowmelt
hydrology of the northern Rocky Mountains, J. Climate, 24, 1666–1687,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3729.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010JCLI3729.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Roe, G. H., Baker, M. B., and Herla, F.: Centennial glacier retreat as
categorical evidence of regional climate change, Nat. Geosci., 10, 95–99,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2863" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2863</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2122?><ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Ruiz, L., Berthier, E., Viale, M., Pitte, P., and Masiokas, M. H.: Recent
geodetic mass balance of Monte Tronador glaciers, northern Patagonian Andes,
The Cryosphere, 11, 619–634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-619-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-11-619-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Selkowitz, D. J., Fagre, D. B., and Reardon, B. A.: Interannual variations in
snowpack in the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem, Hydrol. Process., 16,
3651–3665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1234" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.1234</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Sibson, R.: A Brief Description of Natural Neighbor Interpolation, in
Interpolating Multivariate Data, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 21–36,
1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, M. J., Goodchild, M. F., and Longley, P. A.: Geospatial Analysis: A
Comprehensive Guide to Principles Techniques and Software Tools, 6th edn.,
Troubador Publishing Ltd., London, UK, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Thomson, L. I., Zemp, M., Copland, L., Cogley, J. G., and Ecclestone, M. A.:
Comparison of geodetic and glaciological mass budgets for White Glacier, Axel
Heiberg Island, Canada, J. Glaciol., 63, 55–66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2016.112</ext-link>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Winstral, A., Elder, K., and Davis, R. E.: Spatial Snow Modeling of
Wind-Redistributed Snow Using Terrain-Based Parameters, J. Hydrometeorol., 3,
524–538,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0524:SSMOWR&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0524:SSMOWR&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Zemp, M., Thibert, E., Huss, M., Stumm, D., Rolstad Denby, C., Nuth, C.,
Nussbaumer, S. U., Moholdt, G., Mercer, A., Mayer, C., Joerg, P. C., Jansson,
P., Hynek, B., Fischer, A., Escher-Vetter, H., Elvehøy, H., and
Andreassen, L. M.: Reanalysing glacier mass balance measurement series, The
Cryosphere, 7, 1227–1245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1227-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-1227-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, B.: Towards a higher level of automation in softcopy photogrammetry:
NGATE and LiDAR processing in SOCET SET<sup>®</sup>, in:
GeoCue Corporation 2nd Annual Technical Exchange Conference, Nashville,
Tennessee, 26–27 September 2006, 32 pp., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Local topography increasingly influences the mass balance of a retreating cirque glacier</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Local topographically driven processes – such as wind drifting, avalanching,
and shading – are known to alter the relationship between the mass balance
of small cirque glaciers and regional climate. Yet partitioning such local
effects from regional climate influence has proven difficult, creating
uncertainty in the climate representativeness of some glaciers. We address
this problem for Sperry Glacier in Glacier National Park, USA, using
field-measured surface mass balance, geodetic constraints on mass balance,
and regional climate data recorded at a network of meteorological and snow
stations. Geodetically derived mass changes during 1950–1960, 1960–2005,
and 2005–2014 document average mass change rates during each period at
−0.22&thinsp;±&thinsp;0.12, −0.18&thinsp;±&thinsp;0.05, and
−0.10&thinsp;±&thinsp;0.03&thinsp;m&thinsp;w.e.&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. A correlation of field-measured mass balance and regional
climate variables closely (i.e., within 0.08&thinsp;m&thinsp;w.e.&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup>) predicts
the geodetically measured mass loss from 2005 to 2014. However, this
correlation overestimates glacier mass balance for 1950–1960 by
+1.20&thinsp;±&thinsp;0.95&thinsp;m&thinsp;w.e.&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup>. Our analysis suggests that local
effects, not represented in regional climate variables, have become a more
dominant driver of the net mass balance as the glacier lost 0.50&thinsp;km<sup>2</sup>
and retreated further into its cirque.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alden, C.: Glaciers of Glacier National Park, Department of the Interior,
Washington, D.C., USA, 48 pp., 1914.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, E. H., O'Neel, S., Fagre, D. B., Whorton, E. N., Sass, L. C., McNeil,
C. J., Peitzsch, E. H., Clark, A. M., Florentine, C. E., and McGrath, D.:
USGS Benchmark Glacier Mass Balance and Project Data: 1966–2016, U.S.
Geological Survey data release, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5066/F7BG2N8R" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5066/F7BG2N8R</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Carrara, P. E.: Late Quaternary Glacial and Vegetative History of the
Glacier National Park Region, Montana, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1902,
U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington D.C., 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Carturan, L., Baldassi, G. A., Bondesan, A., Calligaro, S., Carton, A.,
Cazorzi, F., Dalla Fontana, G., Francese, R., Guarnieri, A., Milan, N., Moro,
D., and Tarolli, P.: Current Behaviour and Dynamics of the Lowermost Italian
Glacier (Montasio Occidentale, Julian Alps), Geogr. Ann. A, 95, 79–96,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12002</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Carturan, L., Cazorzi, F., De Blasi, F., and Dalla Fontana, G.: Air
temperature variability over three glaciers in the Ortles–Cevedale (Italian
Alps): effects of glacier fragmentation, comparison of calculation methods,
and impacts on mass balance modeling, The Cryosphere, 9, 1129–1146,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1129-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1129-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, A. M., Fagre, D. B., Peitzsch, E. H., Reardon, B. A., and Harper, J.
T.: Glaciological measurements and mass balances from Sperry Glacier,
Montana, USA, years 2005–2015, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 47–61,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-47-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-47-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Cogley, J. G., Hock, R., Rassmussen, L. A., Arendt, A. A., Bauder, A.,
Braithwaite, R. J., Jansson, P., Kaser, G., Moller, M., Nicholson, L., and
Zemp, M.: Glossary of mass balance and related terms, IHP-VII Technical
Documents in Hydrology No. 86, IACS Contribution No. 2, UNESCO-IHP, Paris.,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cuffey, K. M. and Patterson, W. S. B.: The Physics of Glaciers, 4th edn.,
Elsevier, Oxford, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
DeBeer, C. M. and Sharp, M. J.: Recent changes in glacier area and volume
within the southern Canadian Cordillera, Ann. Glaciol., 46, 215–221,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756407782871710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756407782871710</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
DeBeer, C. M. and Sharp, M. J.: Topographic influences on recent changes of
very small glaciers in the monashee mountains, British Columbia, Canada,
J. Glaciol., 55, 691–700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309789470851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309789470851</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dyurgerov, M. B. and Meier, M. F.: Twentieth century climate change: Evidence
from small glaciers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 1406–1411, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
ESRI: ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.3.1, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fagre, D. B., McKeon, L. A., Dick, L. A., and Fountain, A. G.: Glacier margin
time series (1966, 1998, 2005, 2015) of the named glaciers of Glacier
National Park, MT, USA, U.S. Geol. Surv. data release, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Fahey, M.: National Civil Applications Program, U.S. Geological Survey,
Reston, VA, USA, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, P. and Rich, P. M.: A geometric solar radiation model with applications
in agriculture and forestry, Comput. Electron. Agr., 37, 25–35,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00115-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00115-1</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Gillan, B. J., Harper, J. T., and Moore, J. N.: Timing of present and future
snowmelt from high elevations in northwest Montana, Water Resour. Res., 46,
W01507, doi:10.1029/2009WR007861, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hannah, D. M., Gurnell, A. M., and McGregor, G. R.: Spatio-temporal variation
in microclimate, the surface energy balance and ablation over a cirque
glacier, Int. J. Climatol., 20, 733–758,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0088(20000615)20:7&lt;733::AID-JOC490&gt;3.0.CO;2-F" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0088(20000615)20:7&lt;733::AID-JOC490&gt;3.0.CO;2-F</a>,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Haugen, B. D., Scambos, T. A., Pfeffer, W. T., and Anderson, R. S.:
Twentieth-century Changes in the Thickness and Extent of Arapaho Glacier,
Front Range, Colorado, Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 42, 198–209,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-42.2.198" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-42.2.198</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hock, R.: Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas, J. Hydrol.,
282, 104–115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00257-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00257-9</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffman, M. J., Fountain, A. G., and Achuff, J. M.: 20th-century variations
in area of cirque glaciers and glacierets, Rocky Mountain National Park,
Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USA, Ann. Glaciol., 46, 349–354,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756407782871233" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756407782871233</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Huss, M.: Density assumptions for converting geodetic glacier volume change
to mass change, The Cryosphere, 7, 877–887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-877-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-877-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Huss, M. and Fischer, M.: Sensitivity of Very Small Glaciers in the Swiss
Alps to Future Climate Change, Front. Earth Sci., 4, 34,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00034</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Huss, M., Hock, R., Bauder, A., and Funk, M.: 100-year mass changes in the
Swiss Alps linked to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 37, L10501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042616" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042616</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, A.: Grinnell and Sperry Glaciers, Glacier National Park, Montana: A
record of vanishing ice, Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep., 1180, 1–29, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Kaser, G., Fountain, A., Jansson, P., Heucke, E., and Knaus, M.: A manual for
monitoring the mass balance of mountain glaciers, UNESCO, 137 pp., 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhn, M.: The mass balance of very small glaciers, Zeitschrift für
Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie, 31, 171–179, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Laha, S., Kumari, R., Singh, S., Mishra, A., Sharma, T., Banerjee, A.,
Nainwal, H. C., and Shankar, R.: Evaluating the contribution of avalanching
to the mass balance of Himalayan glaciers, Ann. Glaciol., 58, 110–118,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2017.27" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2017.27</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
McCabe, G. J. and Dettinger, M. D.: Primary Modes and Predictability of
Year-to-Year Snowpack Variations in the Western United States from
Teleconnections with Pacific Ocean Climate, J. Hydrometeorol., 3, 13–25,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0013:PMAPOY&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0013:PMAPOY&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Naegeli, K. and Huss, M.: Sensitivity of mountain glacier mass balance to
changes in bare-ice albedo, Ann. Glaciol., 58, 119–129,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2017.25" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2017.25</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Nuth, C. and Kääb, A.: Co-registration and bias corrections of
satellite elevation data sets for quantifying glacier thickness change, The
Cryosphere, 5, 271–290, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-271-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-271-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Østrem, G. and Brugman, M.: Glacier Mass Balance Measurements: A Manual
for Field and Office Work, Minister of Supply and Services, Environment
Canada and Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Administration, 224 pp.,
1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Outcalt, S. J. and MacPhail, D. D.: A survey of Neoglaciation in the Front
Range of Colorado, University of Colorado Press, Boulder, CO, 1965.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Pederson, G. T., Gray, S. T., Ault, T., Marsh, W., Fagre, D. B., Bunn, A. G.,
Woodhouse, C. A., and Graumlich, L. J.: Climatic controls on the snowmelt
hydrology of the northern Rocky Mountains, J. Climate, 24, 1666–1687,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3729.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3729.1</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Roe, G. H., Baker, M. B., and Herla, F.: Centennial glacier retreat as
categorical evidence of regional climate change, Nat. Geosci., 10, 95–99,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2863" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2863</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ruiz, L., Berthier, E., Viale, M., Pitte, P., and Masiokas, M. H.: Recent
geodetic mass balance of Monte Tronador glaciers, northern Patagonian Andes,
The Cryosphere, 11, 619–634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-619-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-619-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Selkowitz, D. J., Fagre, D. B., and Reardon, B. A.: Interannual variations in
snowpack in the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem, Hydrol. Process., 16,
3651–3665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1234" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1234</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Sibson, R.: A Brief Description of Natural Neighbor Interpolation, in
Interpolating Multivariate Data, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 21–36,
1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, M. J., Goodchild, M. F., and Longley, P. A.: Geospatial Analysis: A
Comprehensive Guide to Principles Techniques and Software Tools, 6th edn.,
Troubador Publishing Ltd., London, UK, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Thomson, L. I., Zemp, M., Copland, L., Cogley, J. G., and Ecclestone, M. A.:
Comparison of geodetic and glaciological mass budgets for White Glacier, Axel
Heiberg Island, Canada, J. Glaciol., 63, 55–66, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.112</a>,
2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Winstral, A., Elder, K., and Davis, R. E.: Spatial Snow Modeling of
Wind-Redistributed Snow Using Terrain-Based Parameters, J. Hydrometeorol., 3,
524–538,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0524:SSMOWR&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0524:SSMOWR&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Zemp, M., Thibert, E., Huss, M., Stumm, D., Rolstad Denby, C., Nuth, C.,
Nussbaumer, S. U., Moholdt, G., Mercer, A., Mayer, C., Joerg, P. C., Jansson,
P., Hynek, B., Fischer, A., Escher-Vetter, H., Elvehøy, H., and
Andreassen, L. M.: Reanalysing glacier mass balance measurement series, The
Cryosphere, 7, 1227–1245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1227-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1227-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, B.: Towards a higher level of automation in softcopy photogrammetry:
NGATE and LiDAR processing in SOCET SET<span style="position:relative; bottom:0.5em; " class="text">®</span>, in:
GeoCue Corporation 2nd Annual Technical Exchange Conference, Nashville,
Tennessee, 26–27 September 2006, 32 pp., 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
