<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">TC</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>The Cryosphere</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TC</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">The Cryosphere</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1994-0424</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-10-1809-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Rapid glacial retreat on the Kamchatka Peninsula during the early 21st
century</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Rapid glacial retreat on the Kamchatka Peninsula}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C. M. Lynch et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lynch</surname><given-names>Colleen M.</given-names></name>
          <email>clynch31@qub.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Barr</surname><given-names>Iestyn D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-8738</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mullan</surname><given-names>Donal</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ruffell</surname><given-names>Alastair</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen's
University, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Colleen M. Lynch (clynch31@qub.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>1809</fpage><lpage>1821</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>8</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016.html">This article is available from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Monitoring glacier fluctuations provides insights into
changing glacial environments and recent climate change. The availability of
satellite imagery offers the opportunity to view these changes for remote
and inaccessible regions. Gaining an understanding of the ongoing changes in
such regions is vital if a complete picture of glacial fluctuations globally
is to be established. Here, satellite imagery (Landsat 7, 8 and ASTER) is
used to conduct a multi-annual remote sensing survey of glacier fluctuations
on the Kamchatka Peninsula (eastern Russia) over the 2000–2014 period.
Glacier margins were digitised manually and reveal that, in 2000, the
peninsula was occupied by 673 glaciers, with a total glacier surface area of
775.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27.9 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. By 2014, the number of glaciers had increased
to 738 (reflecting the fragmentation of larger glaciers), but their surface
area had decreased to 592.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.4 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This represents a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 % decline in total glacier surface area between 2000
and 2014 and a notable acceleration in the rate of area loss since the late
20th century. Analysis of possible controls indicates that these
glacier fluctuations were likely governed by variations in climate
(particularly rising summer temperatures), though the response of individual
glaciers was modulated by other (non-climatic) factors, principally glacier
size, local shading and debris cover.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Since glaciers are intrinsically linked to climate (Oerlemans et al., 1998),
fluctuations in their dimensions are some of the best natural indicators of
recent climate change (Lemke et al., 2007; Paul et al., 2009). In recent
years, the improved quality and availability of satellite imagery has
allowed fluctuations of glaciers in isolated and often inaccessible regions
to be studied remotely (Gao and Liu, 2001; Raup et al., 2007). This can
reveal key information concerning the changing local climate and provide
insights into specific controls on glacier behaviour (e.g. allowing the
role of climatic forcing and non-climatic modulation to be assessed)
(Tennant et al., 2012; Stokes et al., 2013; Burns and Nolin, 2014). Given
this utility, we use remote sensing methods to investigate recent
(2000–2014) fluctuations in the surface area of glaciers on the Kamchatka
Peninsula (eastern Russia) and consider possible climatic and non-climatic
impacts on this behaviour. The Kamchatka Peninsula is of particular interest
because investigation of its recent glacial history has been limited (cf.
Khromova et al., 2014; Earl and Gardner, 2016), despite being the largest
glacierised area in NE Asia (Solomina et al., 2007) and a region where
glaciers, climate and active volcanoes currently interact (Barr and
Solomina, 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Study area</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Topography</title>
      <p>Located in the Russian Far East, the Kamchatka Peninsula occupies
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 260 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. It extends approximately 1250 km from the
Koryak Highlands in the north to Cape Lopatka in the south and separates
the North Pacific Ocean to the east from the Sea of Okhotsk to the west
(Fig. 1). The peninsula has been shaped by both volcanic and glacial forces
(Braitseva et al., 1995, 1997; Ponomareva et al., 2007, 2013; Barr and
Clark, 2012a, b) and is dominated by three mountain ranges: the Sredinny
(Central) Range, the Eastern Volcanic Plateau and the Vostocny (Eastern)
Range (Fig. 1). Between these ranges lies the Central Kamchatka Depression,
with relatively flat terrain punctuated by high volcanic peaks (&gt; 4000 m above sea level; a.s.l.).
The three principal mountain ranges are
orientated north-east to south-west, reflecting the position and eastward
movement of the Kuril–Kamchatka subduction zone, which forms an offshore
trench running almost parallel to the peninsula's eastern coastline (Bulin,
1978). This subduction zone is responsible for the 30 active and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 inactive volcanoes on the peninsula (Solomina et al.,
2007).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Map of the Kamchatka Peninsula (Russia) with glacier extent in
2000 shown in blue. Numbers refer to locations discussed in the text.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Satellite images used to generate the glacier inventory.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">2000 </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col8" align="center">2014 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Path</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Row</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Date</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Scene ID</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Path</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Row</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Date</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Scene Id</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22/09/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE70980212000266EDC01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29/08/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC80970222014241LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22/09/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE70980222000250EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">05/09/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC80980192014248LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">06/09/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE70980222000250EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27/08/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC80990192014239LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">06/09/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE70980232000250EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27/08/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC80990202014239LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28/08/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE70990182000241EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27/08/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC80990212014239LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28/08/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE70990222000241EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12/09/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC80990212014255LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28/08/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE70990232000241EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12/09/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC80990222014255LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18/07/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE71000192000200EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27/08/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC80990232014239LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19/08/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE71000202000232EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12/09/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC80990232014255LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19/08/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE71000212000232EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12/09/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC80990242014255LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19/08/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE71000222000232EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19/09/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC81000192014262LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20/09/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE71000232000264EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19/09/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC81000202014262LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20/09/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LE71000242000264EDC00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">101</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10/09/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC81010212014253LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20/07/2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AST_L1T_00307202000004626 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">101</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10/09/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LC81010222014253LGN00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">_20150410120043_53236</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Climate</title>
      <p>Kamchatka lies between 50 and 61<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and
155 and 163<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, and its proximity to the Pacific
Ocean and Sea of Okhotsk results in a significantly milder climate than much
of adjacent Siberia. Average summer temperatures range from 10
to 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Ivanov, 2002), whilst average winter temperatures range
from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the south-east, and from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the interior and north-west, where
cold temperatures are amplified by the effects of continentality and higher
altitudes. A similar gradient is visible in the precipitation regime, with
average annual values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1500–2000 mm in the south-east and
400–600 mm in the north-west. This gradient is partly a consequence of the
mountain chains acting as orographic barriers, impeding and disrupting
air flow from the Pacific (Barr and Clark, 2011). During winter, cold, dry
air is drawn from the Siberian High over central Siberia (Barr and Solomina,
2014). However, this is tempered by the development of a low pressure system
over the Sea of Okhotsk, which sustains precipitation and elevates
temperatures during winter (Velichko and Spasskaya, 2002). During summer,
the Pacific High, to the south-east, brings warm–moist air masses across the
peninsula. Precipitation peaks during autumn, aided by the delayed onset of
the East Asian monsoon (Velichko and Spasskaya, 2002).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Glaciers</title>
      <p>At present, glaciers on the peninsula are found within the three principal
mountain ranges and on the high volcanic peaks of the Central Kamchatka
Depression (see Fig. 1). The first attempts to estimate the extent of the
region's glaciers were published as part of the “Catalogue of Glaciers in
the USSR, volume 20” (Vinogradov, 1968; Khromova et al., 2014). This was
based on observations from topographic maps and aerial imagery captured in
the early 1950s (various years), supplemented by field studies (Kotlyakov,
1980). In this survey, 405 glaciers were documented, with a total area of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 874 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Vinogradov, 1968). This was used as a basis
for the USSR Glacier Inventory (UGI), and the dataset was subsequently
incorporated within both the World Glacier Inventory (WGI) (WGMS, 1989) and
Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI) version 2 (Arendt et al., 2012). Subsequent
estimates of the total number and surface area of glaciers on the peninsula
tend to differ. For example, Muraviev (1999) reports 448 glaciers, with a
total area of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 906 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while Solomina et al. (2007)
report 446 glaciers, with a total area of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 900 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most
recently, Earl and Gardner (2016) conducted extensive mapping of glaciers in
northern Asia using automated remote sensing techniques (i.e. NDSI), with a
size threshold of 0.02 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and documented 984 glaciers on Kamchatka,
covering a total area of 770.3 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. These data were incorporated into the
most recent version of the RGI (version 5, released in July 2015) (Arendt et
al., 2015). However, it is of note that the Earl and Gardner (2016) dataset
is based on a mosaic of satellite images from multiple years (2000, 2002,
2009, 2011, 2013), meaning their estimate does not reflect glacier extent at
a single point in time (or during a single year).</p>
      <p>In addition to these peninsula-wide inventories, investigations into recent
glacier fluctuations in specific regions of Kamchatka have been conducted
(locations identified in Fig. 1). For example, based on the analysis of
satellite imagery, data from the UGI, and aerial photographs, Muraviev and
Nosenko (2013) identified a 16.6 % decline in glacier surface area in the
northern sector of the Sredinny Range between 1950 and 2013. Muraviev (2014), using these same techniques, identified a 19.2 % decrease in
glacier surface area in the Alney–Chashakondzha region between 1950 and 2013
and a 22.9 % decrease on the Kronotsky Peninsula between 1950 and 2010. On
the basis of fieldwork (2007–2010) and the analysis of aerial photographs
(from 1974), Manevich et al. (2015) documented fluctuations of 27 glaciers
on the slopes of the Avachinsky volcanic group between 1974 and 2010 and
found that, during this period, seven glaciers advanced, two retreated and
eight remained largely stationary. Other, smaller-scale studies include
investigations of glaciers on the slopes of Ichinsky Volcano
(55.690<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 157.726<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) (see Matoba et al., 2007),
Koryak Volcano (53.321<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 158.706<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) (see Manevich and
Samoilenko, 2012), in the Klyuchevskaya volcanic group (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56.069<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 160.467<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) (see Shiraiwa et al., 2001), and
at Koryto glacier (54.846<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 161.758<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) on the
Kronotsky Peninsula (see Yamaguchi et al., 1998, 2007, 2008). As a result of
these investigations, some of the glaciers in the Central Kamchatka
Depression have been documented as “surge-type” (Vinogradov et al., 1985).
For example, Bilchenok glacier (56.100<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 160.482<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)
in the Klyuchevskaya volcanic group is known to have surged <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km in 1959/1960 and again in 1982/84 (Muraviev et al., 2012). In this
example, surging appears unrelated to climate and is likely driven by the
strengthening of seismic activity at Ushkovsky Volcano (56.069<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
160.467<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), upon which the glacier sits (Muraviev et al., 2012).
Direct mass balance observations from Kamchatka's glaciers are limited, with
the longest continuous record obtained for Kozelsky glacier
(53.245<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 158.846<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), spanning the 1973–1997 period.
Other mass balance measurements, from Koryto, Mutnovsky SW
(52.448<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 158.181<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Mutnovsky NE (52.460<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 158.220<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), and Kropotkina (54.321<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
160.034<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) glaciers, are far shorter and often discontinuous (see
Barr and Solomina, 2014).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Data sources</title>
      <p>Changes in glacier extent on the Kamchatka Peninsula between 2000 and 2014
were determined through visual analysis of multi-spectral Landsat 7 Enhanced
Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI), and
Terra Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER)
satellite images (see Table 1). Orthorectified scenes were obtained from the
USGS Earth Explorer website (<uri>http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/</uri>)
and projected using WGS 1984 Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone 57N,
then filtered to find those with minimal cloud cover and snow cover. To achieve
this, images were restricted to those captured during the ablation season
(for Kamchatka this occurs from late July to early September). Satellite
images captured prior to 2000 (e.g. Landsat MSS and CORONA) were obtained
and analysed; however images captured during the ablation season, with
minimal snow cover and cloud cover were limited, and full coverage of the
peninsula's glaciers was lacking. As a result, the present study only
focuses on 2000 and 2014 (i.e. those years with full satellite coverage of
the region's glaciers). In total, 14 Landsat 7 (ETM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scenes and 1 ASTER
image were used for 2000, with 14 Landsat 8 (OLI) scenes used for 2014 (see
Table 1). The Landsat scenes have a spatial resolution of 30 m for all bands
except panchromatic band 8 (15 m) and Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) band 6
(60 m), whilst the ASTER image (bands 1–3) has a spatial resolution of 15 m.
To analyse glacier topography, SRTM 1 Arc-Second Global elevation data
were obtained from the USGS Earth Explorer website. This reflects the surface
topography of the glaciers in February 2000, with a horizontal resolution of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 m and with vertical errors &lt; 16 m (at the 90 %
confidence level) (Farr et al., 2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Delineation of glacier margins</title>
      <p>As highlighted by Paul et al. (2013), the identification and mapping of
glaciers from satellite images can be conducted using semi-automated
techniques (e.g. Paul and Andreassen, 2009; Kamp and Pan, 2015; Smith et
al., 2015; Earl and Gardner, 2016) or through manual digitising (e.g. DeBeer
and Sharp, 2007; Stokes et al., 2013). In the present study, in order to
establish the best method for mapping glaciers on Kamchatka, both
semi-automated techniques and manual digitisation were trialled. The
semi-automated techniques (specifically a RED/SWIR ratio and Normalised
Difference Snow Index (NDSI)) produced rapid outputs and were easily applied
across large regions but had difficulty differentiating ice from the
surrounding environment (Fig. 2). The RED/SWIR band ratio had particular
problems in distinguishing shaded areas and dirty ice, while the NDSI
sometimes failed to distinguish ice from clouds and water bodies. Due to
these difficulties, combined with the extensive manual editing and
post-processing required to produce precise glacier margins, the
semi-automated techniques were rejected in favour of manual mapping.
Although time-consuming and sometimes subjective (Bhambri et al., 2011; Paul
et al., 2013; Pfeffer et al., 2014), manual mapping remains the best method
to extract detailed information on glacier dimensions (Kääb, 2005)
whilst additionally allowing snow patches and areas covered by shadow to be
identified (see Fig. 2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Comparison of glacier margins (on the slopes of Mutnovsky Volcano)
delineated by two semi-automated techniques and manual mapping (Landsat
2014 background image). This figure illustrates how manual mapping can help
identify snow patches and shaded areas of glacier ice, thereby allowing the
former to be discounted from, and the latter included in, the glacier
inventory.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>To help differentiate glaciers from their surroundings and aid in the visual
detection of glacier margins, both true- and false-colour composites of the
satellite images were generated (Malinverni et al., 2008), with the high-resolution band 8 (15 m) used to sharpen the image. The true-colour
composites were used for the identification of glaciers, while the
false-colour composites helped differentiate ice and cloud, due to the
strong absorption of ice in the SWIR band when compared to clouds (Nuimura
et al., 2015). Glaciers were mapped in ArcGIS 10.2.2 (by a single operator)
as polygon shapefiles, and features &lt; 0.02 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2000 were
excluded from the analysis on the grounds that they are likely to be snow
or ice patches, rather than glaciers (Paul and Andreassen, 2009; Paul et
al., 2009; Bajracharya and Shresta, 2011; Frey et al., 2012; Racoviteanu et
al., 2015). To help verify that each of the digitised polygons was a glacier
rather than a transient snow patch, scenes from intervening years, including
2015, were also obtained and analysed (Paul et al., 2009). However, the
glacier inventory produced here does not contain detailed information about
glacier dimensions for these intervening years since complete peninsula-wide
imagery without extensive snow cover or cloud cover was unavailable for these
periods, meaning that not all glaciers were mapped. For each of the glaciers
mapped in 2000 and 2014, two-dimensional surface area was measured directly
from the shapefiles, and area differences between 2000 and 2014 were
calculated. Where glaciers fragmented into several distinct ice masses over
this period, the net change in area was calculated based on the sum of the
total area of each of the glacier “fragments” (following DeBeer and Sharp,
2007). For each glacier identified in the inventory in 2000, maximum,
minimum and median altitude as well as mean surface slope were calculated from the
SRTM digital elevation model (DEM), and generalised glacier aspect was estimated from a line
connecting the glacier's maximum and minimum altitudes. The mean annual
receipt of solar radiation at the surface of each glacier was calculated
using the “Solar Radiation” tool in ArcGIS (algorithms developed by Fu and
Rich, 2002), and glacier length was estimated along inferred flow lines.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Error estimation</title>
      <p>Potential sources of error in this study arise through the digitisation
process and with difficulties in correctly identifying areas of glacial ice.
The accuracy of digitisation depends partly on the spatial resolution of the
satellite imagery, snow conditions and the contrast between glacier ice and
the surrounding environment (DeBeer and Sharp, 2007; Stokes et al., 2013).
In Kamchatka, it is notable that the maritime conditions create particular
difficulty with locating cloud-free imagery, and persistent snow cover often
hinders the clear identification of glacier margins (Paul and Andreassen,
2009). Where glacier margins were partially obscured by shadow, debris or
cloud, careful analysis using multiple true- and false-colour composite band
images, as well as thermal imagery, was undertaken. Error was calculated
following the method described in Bajracharya et al. (2014):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RMSE</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes glacier area and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the glacier area
calculated on the pixel base (i.e. the total number of pixels within a
polygon, multiplied by the highest image resolution (15 m) used for
mapping), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of polygons digitised. Error was found to be
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6 % in 2000 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4 % in 2014. These
values are comparable to those reported in other studies (Bolch et al.,
2010; Bhambri et al., 2013; Bajracharya et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Climate data</title>
      <p>NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data (see Kalnay et al., 1996) were used to analyse
recent fluctuations in climate across Kamchatka. The NCEP reanalysis data
integrate available land surface data from climate stations with the
recovery of data from radiosondes, aircraft, ships and satellites to
assimilate a quality-controlled gridded (1.88<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
1.88<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude) record of surface climate variables for the
period 1948–present (Kalnay et al., 1996). The precipitation data reflect
surface conditions, and temperature data reflect conditions at a height of
2 m a.s.l. Reanalysis data were used in preference to analysing individual
weather stations, since the latter are often situated in coastal locations,
distant from Kamchatka's glaciers. Additionally, many of the available
station records include periods of missing data.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Glacier inventory in 2000</title>
      <p>In total, 673 glaciers, with a combined surface area of 775.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27.9 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, were identified and mapped on the peninsula in 2000 (see Fig. 1).
Summary statistics for these glaciers are presented in Table 2, revealing a
mean surface area of 1.15 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (ranging from 0.02 to 48.82 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 77 % &lt; 1 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and less
than 4 % &gt; 5 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, though the latter represent just over
one-third of the total glacier area. Glaciers range in length from 0.17 km
to 20.96 km, while ranging in altitude from 273 to 4407 m a.s.l., with
a mean altitudinal range of 465 m, and a mean surface slope of 17<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mean annual receipt of solar radiation at the surface of each glacier
ranges from 489.8 to 1012.4 (kWh m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Across the peninsula, 52 glaciers
have tongues covered with debris (rock and ash), the majority of which exist
on volcanic slopes in the Central Kamchatka Depression (see Yamaguchi et
al., 2007).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Statistics for glaciers on the Kamchatka Peninsula in 2000
(topographic attributes are derived from the SRTM 30 m DEM).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.91}[.91]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Max</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Area (km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Minimum altitude (m a.s.l)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">273</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1277</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2920</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Median altitude (m a.s.l.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">544</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1506</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3539</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maximum altitude (m a.s.l.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">577</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1742</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4407</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Altitudinal range (m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">465</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3104</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maximum flow-line length (km)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean surface slope (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean annual solar radiation (kWh m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">489.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">817.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1012.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Changes in glacier number and extent between 2000 and 2014</title>
      <p>In 2014, 738 glaciers, covering an area of 592.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.4 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, were
identified and mapped on the peninsula. This represents an additional 65
glaciers, but an overall area loss of 182.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 %), relative to 2000. The increase in glacier number
occurred despite the loss of 46 glaciers during this period (these glaciers
were all &lt; 0.5 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2000 and either completely disappeared
or fell below the size threshold of 0.02 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, by 2014) (see Fig. 3)
and primarily reflects the fragmentation of larger glaciers. Of the
peninsula's 673 glaciers identified in 2000, 654 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 97 %)
experienced a reduction in surface area by 2014, and this decline is seen
across the peninsula (Fig. 4). Of the 17 glaciers that increased in area
during this period, the majority experienced minor growth. One glacier
increased by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 140 % (see Fig. 4b) but was very close to
the size threshold of 0.02 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2000, and the area gain over the
period of observation only equates to 0.03 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition to areal
decline, signs of stationary thinning (downwasting) are apparent in many
areas, reflected by the exposure of many rock outcrops and the fragmentation
of glaciers (see Fig. 5). The exposure of bedrock in this way further
accelerates glacier wastage as local albedo is reduced (Paul et al., 2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Climate</title>
      <p>When analysed across the peninsula, the NCEP data appear to indicate a
reduction in precipitation between the 1970s and 1990s but a precipitation
increase thereafter (see Fig. 6a). This recent increase in precipitation is
particularly notable during autumn (Fig. 6a), though more importantly for
glacier mass balance, winter precipitation also increases during this
period, likely contributing directly to increased snow accumulation. The
temperature data (Fig. 6b) appear to show a warming trend from the 1950s to
the late 1990s, which has continued (with some fluctuations) to the present
day. Most significantly, there has been a sharp increase in average summer
temperatures (June, July and August) since the early 21st century (see
Fig. 6b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Example of a small glacier in the Vostocny Mountains that
disappeared between 2000 <bold>(a)</bold> and 2014 <bold>(b)</bold>. In both <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>, the
background is a Landsat image.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Percentage change in glacier surface area across the Kamchatka
Peninsula between 2000 and 2014. <bold>(a)</bold> Mean values shown for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km grid
cells. <bold>(b)</bold> Values for individual glaciers shown as a frequency distribution.
<bold>(c)</bold> Values for individual glaciers in the Klyuchevskaya volcanic group. <bold>(d)</bold>
Values for individual glaciers on the slopes of Ichinsky Volcano. In both
<bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>, the colour scheme from <bold>(a)</bold> is used.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Examples of glaciers on the Kronotsky Peninsula mapped in 2000 and
2014 (Landsat 2014 background image), revealing stationary thinning and a
notable decline in glacier surface area.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Climatic variation on the Kamchatka Peninsula between 1948 and
2015, derived from NCEP/NCAR daily reanalysis figures averaged across the
whole peninsula (see Kalnay at al., 1996). <bold>(a)</bold> Seasonal precipitation
record. <bold>(b)</bold> Average seasonal temperature. <bold>(c)</bold> Summer temperature record
from 1995 to 2015.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relationships between glacier area changes from 2000 to 2014 (in
km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and glacier <bold>(a)</bold> surface area, <bold>(b)</bold> length and <bold>(c)</bold> altitudinal range.
These same relationships, but with percentage area loss are plotted in <bold>(d)</bold>,
<bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparisons, from across Kamchatka, between our mapping (based on
Landsat 8 imagery captured in 2014) and the mapping of Earl and Gardner
(2016).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/1809/2016/tc-10-1809-2016-f08.jpg"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Glacier attributes and glacier area change</title>
      <p>Glacier size (area, perimeter, length and altitudinal range), altitude
(maximum, median and minimum), surface slope and aspect (based on the
glaciers mapped in 2000) were compared to absolute and relative changes in
glacier surface area across the peninsula. These comparisons reveal a strong
negative and statistically significant (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn> 0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) correlation
between the 2000 to 2014 change in glacier surface area (in km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
glacier area (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), length (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and altitudinal range (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 2000 (Fig. 7a–c). When change in area is expressed as a
percentage of the original glacier size (rather than total area), these
correlations become positive (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.34 and 0.34 for surface area,
length and altitudinal range, respectively) and are weakened (though they
remain statistically significant) (Fig. 7d–f). There is also a negative
and statistically significant correlation between glacier surface area
change (in km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the maximum (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and median (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
glacier altitude. Again, when area change is expressed as a percentage,
these correlations become positive (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.17 for maximum and
median, respectively) and are weakened (though they remain statistically
significant). When glacier minimum altitude or surface slope are considered,
there is no statistically significant relationship with glacier area loss
(when expressed as total area, or as percentage change). Glaciers are
predominantly found with an aspect bias towards northerly and western
directions (54.98 %), and glacier aspect shows a weak (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but
statistically significant relationship with changes in glacier surface
area, though only when expressed in km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, rather than as a percentage.
Similarly, analysis of insolation patterns reveals a weak but statistically
significant correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with change in glacier surface area,
but only when expressed in km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, rather than as a percentage.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Based on mapping in 2000, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 % (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the
peninsula's glaciers are classed as debris-covered. When the glacier
population is split into “debris-covered” and “non-debris-covered” samples
in this way, the former lose on average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 % (0.62 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of their surface area between 2000 and 2014, while the latter lose
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 % (0.24 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, over the 2000–2014 period,
debris-covered glaciers lose less surface area than non-debris-covered
examples, though this relationship is only statistically significant when
values are expressed as a percentage, rather than in km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Comparison with other inventories</title>
      <p>Based on the data presented in the Catalogue of Glaciers in the USSR (see
Sect. 2.3) and the findings of the present study, there was a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.2 % decline in glacier surface area on the Kamchatka
Peninsula between the 1950s (exact date unspecified) and 2000 and a further
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23.6 % loss between 2000 and 2014. Assuming linear trends,
this indicates an area-loss rate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24–0.29 % a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
between 1950 and 2000 and a notable acceleration to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.76 % a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> since 2000. The reduction in glacier area during the late
20th century coincides with negative trends in glacier mass balance on the
peninsula (see Barr and Solomina, 2014). Unfortunately, since 2000, mass
balance data have not been collected for Kamchatka's glaciers, and it is not
possible to assess whether accelerated mass loss over the early 21st
century has coincided with the accelerated glacier shrinkage identified
here.</p>
      <p>Similar rates of retreat have been found for glaciers in other Asian
mountain ranges. For example, in the Altai Mountains, Narozhniy and Zemtsov (2011) document a 10.2 % decrease in glacier area between 1956 and 2008,
while Kamp and Pan (2015) document a 13 % decrease between 1998/2001 and
2010/2011. In the Tien Shan, Farinotti et al. (2015) document an
18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 % decrease in glacier surface area between 1961 and 2012. In
the Kodar Mountains, Stokes et al. (2013) document a 44 % decrease in the
area of exposed glacial ice between 1963 and 2010, with a 40 % loss since
1995, and in the Caucasus Mountains, Tielidze (2016) documents a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>36.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % decline in glacier surface area between 1960 and 2014,
though regional differences are noted.</p>
      <p>In terms of glacier surface area, it is notable that our estimate from 2014
(592.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.4 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differs significantly from Earl and Gardner's
(2016) estimate (770.3 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This we attribute to their semi-automated
approach to mapping (i.e. NDSI), which can lead to an overestimation of
glacier area as a result of snow patches being erroneously classified as
glaciers (Man et al., 2014) (see Fig. 8), combined with the fact that their
inventory was generated from a composite of satellite images, meaning their
mapping does not reflect glacier extent during a single specified year (as
noted in Sect. 2.3).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Potential climatic controls on glacier fluctuations</title>
      <p>In the small number of studies to consider the issue (noted in Sect. 2.3),
the retreat of Kamchatka's glaciers over recent decades has typically been
attributed to variations in climate. For example, Yamaguchi et al. (2008)
consider the retreat of Koryto glacier between 1711 and 2000 to be a result
of decreased precipitation over this period. Similarly, in the northern part
of the Sredinny Range, Muraviev and Nosenko (2013) note that from 1950 to
2002, average summer temperatures increased, while solid precipitation
(snowfall) decreased, suggesting that this caused the retreat of the
region's glaciers.</p>
      <p>Based on climatic trends identified from the NCEP data, it might be argued
that the loss of glacier surface area across Kamchatka between the 1950s and
2000 reflects the combined influence of rising temperatures and declining
precipitation. However, since 2000, despite an increase in precipitation,
glacier area loss has continued and appears to have accelerated. This might
reflect a delayed response to earlier drier conditions, but is also likely
driven by a notable increase in temperatures since the mid-1990s. In
particular, the pronounced rise in summer temperature (see Fig. 6c) is
likely to have increased the intensity of melt, whilst rising autumn
temperatures (Fig. 6b) may have lengthened the ablation season
(simultaneously shortening the accumulation season). Therefore, it would
appear that temperature has been the primary control on early 21st
century glacier fluctuations in Kamchatka, with rising temperatures driving
a notable decline in glacier surface area, despite a corresponding rise in
precipitation (even during winter).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Potential non-climatic modulation of glacier fluctuations</title>
      <p>Despite evidence for climatic control over glacier fluctuations in Kamchatka
(outlined in Sect. 5.2), the individual response of these glaciers is
likely to have been modulated by other local non-climatic factors (Evans,
2006; Tennant et al., 2012; Stokes et al., 2013). These factors potentially
include glacier size (area, perimeter length and altitudinal range),
altitude surface slope, and aspect, as well as volcanic controls and debris
cover (Huss, 2012; Fischer et al., 2015).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Glacier size</title>
      <p>Comparisons between glacier size and surface area fluctuations suggest that
smaller glaciers, though losing the least surface area, actually lost a greater
proportion of their total area. Similar trends, with small glaciers showing
a propensity to shrink rapidly, have been found in numerous regions globally
(see Ramírez et al., 2001; Granshaw and
Fountain, 2006; Tennant et al.,
2012; Stokes et al., 2013; Racoviteanu et al., 2015). This is considered a
result of the greater volume-to-area and perimeter-to-area ratios of smaller
glaciers – meaning they respond rapidly to a given ablation rate (Granshaw
and Fountain, 2006; Tennant et al., 2012). This rapid decline in the area of
smaller glaciers on the Kamchatka Peninsula could result in the loss of many
over coming decades, as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 % of the glaciers mapped in
2014 have an area &lt; 0.5 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, of which <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 87 %
have a maximum altitude &lt; 2000 m a.s.l., likely making them
particularly sensitive to future warming. This supports the view of
Ananicheva et al. (2010), who suggest that, by 2100, only the largest
glaciers on the highest volcanic peaks will remain.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Glacier altitude</title>
      <p>Comparisons between glacier median and maximum altitude and surface area
fluctuations would appear to suggest that these factors exert some control
on area change. However, the lack of any statistically significant
relationship between area loss and minimum altitude might indicate that,
rather than exerting a direct control on glacier area, glaciers with high
maximum and median altitudes are typically the largest on the peninsula
(i.e. there are positive and statistically significant relationships
between glacier area and both maximum (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and median (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
altitude), and that size exerts the primary control on glacier behaviour in
this relationship. Similar trends, highlighting the relationship between
glacier area and elevation, have been observed in other regions globally,
for example in the Kanchenjunga–Sikkim region of the Himalayas (Racoviteanu
et al., 2015) and in Cordillera Blanca, Peru (Racoviteanu et al., 2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Glacier aspect</title>
      <p>The aspect bias exhibited by Kamchatkan glaciers, combined with the
statistically significant relationship between area loss and total
insolation indicates that glaciers exposed to most solar radiation typically
show a greater reduction in their overall surface area (see Evans, 2006).
However, though statistically significant, the relationship between glacier
aspect and changes in glacier surface area is comparatively weak, suggesting
that local variations in insolation (e.g. related to topographic shading)
are likely important in protecting glaciers from recession (see Paul and
Haeberli, 2008; Stokes et al., 2013)</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3.SSS4">
  <title>Volcanic controls and debris cover</title>
      <p>Across the peninsula, 165 glaciers are located within a 50 km radius of an
active volcano, with 292 glaciers within a 100 km radius. During the period
of observation (i.e. 2000–2014), &gt; 40 individual volcanic
eruptions were documented on the peninsula (VONA/KVERT, 2016). Although
there is evidence that some glaciers were covered by tephra as a result of
these eruptions, there is no evidence to suggest that this had a discernible
influence on glacier fluctuations during the period of observation. This
likely reflects the longer response time of glaciers to tephra deposition,
since a number of Kamchatka's glaciers are known to have responded to
volcanic ash cover over longer time periods (see Barr and Solomina, 2014).
It is also apparent, from the present study, that debris-covered glaciers on
the peninsula are typically less responsive to external forcing, since they
lose less surface area (both in absolute and, particularly, relative terms)
than non-debris-covered examples. Similar patterns have been observed for
debris-covered glaciers elsewhere. For example, in the Kanchenjunga–Sikkim
area, largely debris-free glaciers showed a 34 % decline in surface area
between 1962 and 2006, whilst debris-covered glaciers experienced a 22 %
decline over this period (Racoviteanu et al., 2015). This tendency for
debris-covered glaciers to retreat comparatively little might reflect the
insulating influence of accumulated surface debris (Vinogradov et al.,
1985) or might indicate that the terminus positions of such glaciers are
inclined to stabilise even when the glaciers are experiencing mass loss.
Such a trend was identified in the central Tien Shan, where Pieczonka and
Bolch (2015) found that glaciers (many of which are debris-covered)
experienced comparatively little area change (below the global average)
between 1975 and 1999, despite mass loss similar to the global average over
this period.</p>
      <p>In addition to the influence exerted by surface debris, some of Kamchatka's
glaciers are known to be of “surge-type”, with surface indicators of past
surge activity (e.g. looped moraines and heavy crevassing) (see Copland et
al., 2003) and with documented surges during the 20th century (as
noted in Sect. 2.3) (Vinogradov et al., 1985; Yamaguchi et al., 2007). However,
there was no evidence of surging during the period of observation. This
might reflect the comparatively short time period considered or may be a
reflection of volcanically controlled surging (see Sect. 2.3) (Muraviev et
al., 2012), which therefore lacks periodicity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this paper, manual digitisation from satellite imagery is used to map the
surface area of all glaciers on the Kamchatka Peninsula in 2000 and 2014.
This is the first study to consider peninsula-wide patterns in glacier
behaviour over the early 21st century, and variations in glacier extent
are put into context through comparison with published glacier extent
estimates from the 1950s (Kotlyakov, 1980). The main study findings can be
summarised as follows:
<list list-type="order"><list-item><p>In total, 673 glaciers, with a combined surface area of
775.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27.9 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, were identified and mapped on the peninsula in 2000. By 2014, the
total number of glaciers had increased to 738 but their surface area had
reduced to 592.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.4 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This suggests an acceleration in
the rate of area loss since 2000 (from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24–0.29 % a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between the 1950s and 2000, to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.76 % a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
between 2000 and 2014). The increase in glacier number, despite the
disappearance of 46, is considered to reflect the fragmentation of larger
glaciers during this period.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Based on the analysis of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis climate data, it appears that
the reduction in glacier surface area on the peninsula between the 1950s and
2000 likely reflects the combined influence of rising temperatures and
declining precipitation. However, accelerated area loss since 2000, despite
increased precipitation, is likely a response to a notable increase in
temperatures across the peninsula since the 1990s. Specifically, the rise in
summer temperatures is likely to have enhanced the intensity of melt, whilst
rising autumn temperatures may have lengthened the ablation season,
simultaneously shortening the accumulation season.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Despite the overall climatic control there is evidence that the behaviour of
individual glaciers on the peninsula is modulated by local non-climatic
factors. Specifically, smaller glaciers, though losing the least absolute
surface area, lost a greater proportion of their total area. This propensity
to shrink rapidly is considered to reflect the greater volume-to-area and
perimeter-to-area ratios of smaller glaciers, meaning that they have a
heightened sensitivity to changing climate (see Granshaw and Fountain,
2006). Though glacier altitude shows some relation with area change, this
probably reflects the positive relationship between glacier altitude and
size (rather than an altitudinal control on glacier behaviour). Insolation
patterns show a weak but statistically significant relationship with
changing glacier surface area, indicating that glaciers exposed to most
solar radiation experienced a greater reduction in their overall surface
area. However, though statistically significant, the relationship between
glacier aspect and changes in glacier surface area is comparatively weak,
suggesting that local variations in insolation (e.g. related to topographic
shading) are important in regulating fluctuations of Kamchatka's glaciers.</p></list-item><list-item><p>If the rapid decline in the surface area of smaller glaciers on the
Kamchatka Peninsula continues over the 21st century, many will be lost
by 2100 (Ananicheva et al., 2010), since <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 % of the
region's glaciers identified in 2014 have an area &lt; 0.5 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, of
which <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 87 % have a maximum altitude &lt; 2000 m a.s.l., likely making them particularly sensitive to future warming.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The data described in this article are the foundation of an ongoing doctoral thesis
(to be completed in 2018). As a result, we are reluctant to provide access to the underlying
research data at this stage. However, we are happy to release the data after this date.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
(1492911).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: T. Bolch<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Ananicheva, M. D., Krenke, A. N., and Barry, R. G.: The Northeast Asia
mountain glaciers in the near future by AOGCM scenarios, The Cryosphere, 4,
435–445, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-435-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-4-435-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Arendt, A., Bolch, T., Cogley, J. G., Gardner, A., Hagen, J.-O., Hock, R.,
Kaser, G., Pfeffer, W. T., Moholdt, G., Paul, F., Radić, V., Andreassen,
L., Bajracharya, S., Beedle, M., Berthier, E., Bhambri, R., Bliss, A., Brown,
I., Burgess, E., Burgess, D., Cawkwell, F., Chinn, T., Copland, L., Davies,
B., De Angelis, H., Dolgova, E., Filbert, K., Forester, R., Fountain, A.,
Frey, H., Giffen, B., Glasser, N., Gurney, S., Hagg, W., Hall, D.,
Haritashya, U. K., Hartmann, G., Helm, C., Herreid, S., Howat, I., Kapustin,
G., Khromova, T., Kienholz, C., Koenig, M., Kohler, J., Kriegel, D., Kutuzov,
S., Lavrentiev, I., LeBris, R., Lund, J., Manley, W., Mayer, C., Miles, E.,
Li, X., Menounos, B., Mercer, A., Moelg, N., Mool, P., Nosenko, G., Negrete,
A., Nuth, C., Pettersson, R., Racoviteanu, A., Ranzi, R., Rastner, P., Rau,
F., Raup, B. H., Rich, J., Rott, H., Schneider, C., Seliverstov, Y., Sharp,
M., Sigurðsson, O., Stokes, C., Wheate, R., Winsvold, S., Wolken, G.,
Wyatt, F., and Zheltyhina, N.: Randolph Glacier Inventory [v2.0]: A Dataset
of Global Glacier Outlines, Global Land Ice Measurements from Space, Boulder
Colorado, USA, Digital Media, edited by: Bajracharya, S. R. and Shresta, B.,
The Status of Glaciers in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region, Kathmandu: ICIMOD,
2011, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Arendt, A., Bliss, A., Bolch, T., Cogley, J. G., Gardner, A. S., Hagen,
J.-O., Hock, R., Huss, M., Kaser, G., Kienholz, C., Pfeffer, W. T., Moholdt,
G., Paul, F., Radić, V., Andreassen, L., Bajracharya, S., Barrand, N. E.,
Beedle, M., Berthier, E., Bhambri, R., Brown, I., Burgess, E., Burgess, D.,
Cawkwell, F., Chinn, T., Copland, L., Davies, B., De Angelis, H., Dolgova,
E., Earl, L., Filbert, K., Forester, R., Fountain, A. G., Frey, H., Giffen,
B., Glasser, N., Guo, W. Q., Gurney, S., Hagg, W., Hall, D., Haritashya, U.
K., Hartmann, G., Helm, C., Herreid, S., Howat, I., Kapustin, G., Khromova,
T., König, M., Kohler, J., Kriegel, D., Kutuzov, S., Lavrentiev, I.,
LeBris, R., Liu, S. Y., Lund, J., Manley, W., Marti, R., Mayer, C., Miles, E.
S., Li, X., Menounos, B., Mercer, A., Mölg, N., Mool, P., Nosenko, G.
Negrete, A., Nuimura, T., Nuth, C., Pettersson, R., Racoviteanu, A., Ranzi,
R., Rastner, P., Rau, F., Raup, B., Rich, J., Rott, H., Sakai, A., Schneider,
C., Seliverstov, Y., Sharp, M., Sigurðsson, O., Stokes, C., Way, R. G.,
Wheate, R., Winsvold, S., Wolken, G., Wyatt, F., and Zheltyhina, N.: Randolph
Glacier Inventory – A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines: Version 5.0.
Global Land Ice Measurements from Space, Boulder Colorado, USA, Digital
Media, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bajracharya, S. R. and Shresta, B. (Eds.): The Status of Glaciers in the
Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region, Kathmandu: ICIMOD, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bajracharya, S. R., Maharjan, S. B., and Shrestha, F.: The status and decadal
change of glaciers in Bhutan from the 1980s to 2010 based on satellite data,
Ann. Glaciol., 55, 66, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG66A125" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2014AoG66A125</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barr, I. D. and Clark, C. D.: Glaciers and climate in Pacific Far NE Russia
during the Last Glacial Maximum, J. Quaternary Sci., 26, 227–237, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Barr, I. D. and Clark, C. D.: An updated moraine map of Far NE Russia,
Journal of Maps, 8, 431–436, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Barr, I. D. and Clark, C. D.: Late Quaternary glaciations in Far NE Russia;
combining moraines, topography and chronology to assess regional and global
glaciation synchrony, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 53, 72–87, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Barr, I. D. and Solomina, O.: Pleistocene and Holocene glacier fluctuations
upon the Kamchatka Peninsula, Global Planet. Change, 113, 110–120, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bhambri, R., Bolch, T., and Chaujar, R. K.: Mapping of debris-covered
glaciers in the Garhwal Himalayas using ASTER DEMs and thermal data, Int. J.
Remote Sens., 32, 8095–8119, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bhambri, R., Bolch, T., Kawishwar, P., Dobhal, D. P., Srivastava, D., and
Pratap, B.: Heterogeneity in glacier response in the upper Shyok valley,
northeast Karakoram, The Cryosphere, 7, 1385–1398,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1385-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-1385-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Bolch, T., Yao, T., Kang, S., Buchroithner, M. F., Scherer, D., Maussion, F.,
Huintjes, E., and Schneider, C.: A glacier inventory for the western
Nyainqentanglha Range and the Nam Co Basin, Tibet, and glacier changes
1976–2009, The Cryosphere, 4, 419–433, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-419-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-4-419-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Braitseva, O. A., Melekestsev, I. V., Ponomareva, V. V., and Sulerzhitsky,
L. D.: Ages of calderas, large explosive craters and active volcanoes in the
KuriI-Kamchatka region, Russia Bulletin of Volcanology, 57, 383–402, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Braitseva, O. A., Ponomareva, V. V., Sulerzhitsky, L. D., Melekestsev, I. V.,
and Bailey, J.: Holocene Key-Marker Tephra Layers in Kamchatka, Russia,
Quaternary Res., 47, 125–139, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Bulin, N. K.: Abyssal structure of Kamchatka and the Kuril Islands from
seismic data, Int. Geol. Rev., 20, 777–784, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Burns, P. and Nolin, A.: Using atmospherically-corrected Landsat imagery to
measure glacier area change in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru from 1987 to 2010,
Remote Sens. Environ., 140, 165–178, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Copland, L., Sharp, M. J., and Dowdeswell, J. A.: The distribution and flow
characteristics of surge-type glaciers in the Canadian High Arctic, Ann.
Glaciol., 36, 73–81, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
DeBeer, C. M. and Sharp, M. J.: Recent changes in glacier area and volume
within the southern Canadian Cordillera, Ann. Glaciol., 46, 215–221, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Earl, L. and Gardner, A.: A satellite-derived glacier inventory for North
Asia, Ann. Glaciol., 57, 50–60, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3189/2016AoG71A008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2016AoG71A008</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Evans, I. S.: Local aspect asymmetry of mountain glaciation: A global survey
of consistency of favoured directions for glacier numbers and altitudes,
Geomorphology, 73, 166–184, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Farinotti, D., Longuevergne, L., Moholdt, G., Duethmann, D., Mölg, T.,
Bolch, T., Vorogushyn, S., and Güntner, A.: Substantial glacier mass loss
in the Tien Shan over the past 50 years, Nature Geosci., 8, 716–723, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S.,
Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E., Roth, L., Seal, D., Shaffer, S.,
Shimada, J., Umland, J., Werner, M., Orkin, M., Burbank, D., and Alsdor, D.:
The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, Rev. Geophys., 45, RG2004,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005RG000183</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Fischer, M., Huss, M., and Hoelzle, M.: Surface elevation and mass changes of
all Swiss glaciers 1980–2010, The Cryosphere, 9, 525–540,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-525-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-525-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, H., Paul, F., and Strozzi, T.: Compilation of a glacier inventory for
the western Himalayas from satellite data: methods, challenges, and results,
Remote Sens. Environ., 124 832–843, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, P. and Rich, P. M.: A geometric solar radiation model with applications
in agriculture and forestry, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37,
25–35, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, J. and Lui, Y.: Applications of remote sensing, GIS and GPS in
glaciology: a review, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 25, 520–540, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Granshaw, F. D. and Fountain, A. G.: Glacier change (1958–1998) in the North
Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, USA, J. Glaciol., 52, 251–256,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Huss, M.: Extrapolating glacier mass balance to the mountain-range scale: the
European Alps 1900–2100, The Cryosphere, 6, 713–727,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-713-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-6-713-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Ivanov, A.: Kamchatka, in: The Physical Geography of Northern Eurasia, edited
by: Shahgedanova, M., Oxford University Press, 403–421, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kääb, A.: Remote sensing of mountain glaciers and permafrost creep,
Zürich, Universität Zürich, Geographisches Institut
(Schriftenreihe Physische Geographie 48) 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, A., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kamp, U. and Pan, C. G.: Inventory of glaciers in Mongolia, derived from
Landsat imagery from 1989 to 2011, Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical
Geography, 94,  653–669, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/geoa.12105</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Khromova, T., Nosenko, G., Kutuzov, S., Muraviev, A., and Chernova, L.:
Glacier area changes in Northern Eurasia, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 015003,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/1/015003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/9/1/015003</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kotlyakov, V. M.: Problems and results of studies of mountain glaciers in the
Soviet Union, World Glacier Inventory - Proceedings of the Riederalp
Workshop, September 1978 IAHS-AISH, 126, 129–137, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lemke, P., Ren, J., Alley, R. B., Allison, I., Carrasco, J., Flato, G.,
Fujii, Y., Kaser, G., Mote, P., Thomas, R. H., and Zhang, T.: Observations:
Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical
Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon,
S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M.,
and Miller, H. L., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and
New York, NY, USA, 337–383, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Malinverni, E. S., Croci, C., and Sgroi, F.: Glacier Monitoring by Remote
sensing and GIS techniques in Open Source Environment, EARSeL eProceedings,
7, 120–132, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Man, Q. M., Guo, H. D., Liu, G., and Dong, P. L.: Comparison of different
methods for monitoring glacier changes observed by Landsat images, IOP
Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 17, 012127,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/17/1/012127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1755-1315/17/1/012127</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Manevich, T. M. and Samoilenko, S. B.: Glaciers of the Koryak Volcano, Ice
and Snow, 52, 25–30, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Manevich, T. M., Muraviev, Y. D., and Samoilenko, S. B.: Glaciers of the
Avachinskaya volcano group: current condition (state), Ice and Snow, 55,
14–26, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Matoba, S., Ushakov, S. V., Shimbori, K., Sasaki, H., Yamasaki, T.,
Ovshannikov, A. A., Manevich, A. G., Zhideleeva, T. M., Kutuzov, S.,
Muravyev, Y. D., and Shiraiwa, T.: The glaciological expedition to Mount
Ichinsky, Kamchatka, Russia, Bull. Glaciol. Res., 24, 79–85, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Muraviev, Y. D.: Present day glaciation in Kamchatka–distribution of
glaciers and snow, Cryospheric Studies in Kamchatka II (Institute of Low
Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, 1–7, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Muraviev, A. Y.: Glacier size changes in Kronotsky Peninsula and
Alney-Chashakondzha Massif, Kamchatka Peninsula in the second half of XX
century and the beginning of XXI century, Ice and Snow, 2, 22–28, 2014
(summary in English).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Muraviev, A. Y. and Nosenko, G. A.: Glaciation change in northern part of the
Middle Range on Kamchatka Peninsula in the second half of the XX century Ice
and Snow, 2, 5–12, 2013 (in Russian with English abstract).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Muraviev, Y. D., Tsvetkov, D. G., Muraviev, A. Y., and Osipova, G. B.:
Dynamics of the Bilchenok Surging Glacier in the Klyuchevskaya, Ice and Snow,
52, 31–39, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Narozhniy, Y. and Zemtsov, V.: Current state of the Altai glaciers (Russia)
and trends over the period of instrumental observations 1952–2008, Ambio,
40, 575–588, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Nuimura, T., Sakai, A., Taniguchi, K., Nagai, H., Lamsal, D., Tsutaki, S.,
Kozawa, A., Hoshina, Y., Takenaka, S., Omiya, S., Tsunematsu, K., Tshering,
P., and Fujita, K.: The GAMDAM glacier inventory: a quality-controlled
inventory of Asian glaciers, The Cryosphere, 9, 849–864,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-849-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-849-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Oerlemans, J., Anderson, B., Hubbard, A., Huybrechts, P., Johannesson, T.,
Knap, W. H., Schmeits, M., Stroeven, A. P., van der Wal, R. S. W., Wallinga,
J., and Zuo, Z.: Modelling the response of glaciers to climate warming, Clim.
Dynam., 14, 267–274, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Paul, F. and Andreassen, L. M.: A new glacier inventory for the Svartisen
region, Norway, from Landsat ETM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> data: challenges and change assessment,
J. Glaciol., 55, 607–618, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Paul, F. and Haeberli, W.: Spatial variability of glacier elevation changes
in the Swiss Alps obtained from two digital elevation models, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L21502, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034718" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL034718</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F., Kääb, A., and Haeberli, W.: Recent glacier changes in the
Alps observed by satellite: Consequences for future monitoring strategies,
Global Planet. Change, 56, 111–122, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F., Barry, R., Cogley, G., Frey, H., Haeberli, W., Ohmura, A.,
Ommanney, S., Raup, B., Rivera, A., and Zemp, M.: Recommendations for the
compilation of glacier inventory data from digital sources, Ann. Glaciol.,
51, 1–8, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F., Barrand, N. E., Baumann, S., Berthier, E., Bolch, T., Casey, K.,
Frey, H., Joshi, S. P., Konovalov, V., Le Bris, R., Mölg, N., Nosenko,
G., Nuth, C., Pope, A., Racoviteanu, A., Rastner, P., Raup, B., Scharrer, K.,
Steffen, S., and Winsvold, S.: On the accuracy of glacier outlines derived
from remote-sensing data, Ann. Glaciol., 54, 171–182, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Pfeffer, W. T., Arendt, A., Bliss, A., Bolch, T., Cogley, J., Gardner, A.,
Hagen, J., Hock, R., Kaser, G., Kienholz, C., Miles, E., Moholdt, G.,
Mölg, N., Paul, F., Radic, V., Rastner, P., Raup, B., Rich, J., Sharp,
M., and Consortium, T. R.: The Randolph Glacier Inventory: a globally
complete inventory of glaciers, J. Glaciol., 60 537–552, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Pieczonka, T. and Bolch, T.: Region-wide glacier mass budgets and area
changes for the Central Tien Shan between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1975 and 1999 using Hexagon
KH-9 imagery, Global Planet. Change, 128, 1–13, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Ponomareva, V., Melekestsev, I., Braitseva, O., Churikova, T., Pevzner, M.,
and Sulerzhitsky, L.: Late Pleistocene-Holocene Volcanism on the Kamchatka
Peninsula, Northwest Pacific Region Volcanism and Subduction: The Kamchatka
Region Geophysical Monograph Series, 172, 165–198, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Ponomareva, V., Portnyagin, M., Derkachev, A., Pendea, I. F., Bourgeois, J.,
Reimer P. J., Garbe-Schönberg, D., Krasheninnikov, S., and Nürnberg,
D.: Early Holocene M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 explosive eruption from Plosky volcanic massif
(Kamchatka) and its tephra as a link between terrestrial and marine
paleoenvironmental records, International J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.),
102, 1673–1699, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00531-013-0898-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00531-013-0898-0</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Racoviteanu, A., Arnaud, Y., and Williams, M.: Decadal changes in glacier
parameters in Cordillera Blanca, Peru derived from remote sensing, J.
Glaciol., 54, 499–510, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Racoviteanu, A. E., Arnaud, Y., Williams, M. W., and Manley, W. F.: Spatial
patterns in glacier characteristics and area changes from 1962 to 2006 in the
Kanchenjunga-Sikkim area, eastern Himalaya, The Cryosphere, 9, 505–523,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-505-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-505-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Ramírez, E., Francou, B., Ribstein, P., Descloitres, M., Guerin, R.,
Mendoza, J., Gallaire, R., Pouyaud, B., and Jordan, E.: Small glaciers
disappearing in the tropical Andes: a case-study in Bolivia: Glaciar
Chacaltaya (16 S), J. Glaciol., 47, 187–194, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Raup, B., Kääb, A., Kargel, J. S., Bishop, M. P., Hamilton, G., Lee,
E., Paul, F., Rau, F., Soltesz, D., Khalsaa, S. J. S., Beedle, M., and Helm,
C.: Remote sensing and GIS technology in the Global Land Ice Measurements
from Space (GLIMS) Project, Computers and Geosciences, 33, 104–125, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, T., Muravyev, Y. D., Kameda, T., Nishio, F., Toyama, Y., Takahashi,
A., Ovsyannikov, A. A., Salamatin, A. N., and Yamagata, K.: Characteristics
of a crater glacier at Ushkovsky volcano, Kamchatka, Russia, as revealed by
the physical properties of ice cores and borehole thermometry, J. Glaciol.,
47, 423–432, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Smith, T., Bookhagen, B., and Cannon, F.: Improving semi-automated glacier
mapping with a multi-method approach: applications in central Asia, The
Cryosphere, 9, 1747–1759, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1747-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-1747-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Solomina, O., Wiles, G., Shiraiwa, T., and D'Arrigo, R.: Multiproxy records
of climate variability for Kamchatka for the past 400 years, Clim. Past, 3,
119–128, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-119-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-3-119-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Stokes, C. R., Shahgedanova, M., Evans, I., and Popovnin, V. V.: Accelerated
loss of alpine glaciers in the Kodar Mountains, south-eastern Siberia, Global
Planet. Change, 101, 82–96, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Tennant, C., Menounos, B., Wheate, R., and Clague, J. J.: Area change of
glaciers in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, 1919 to 2006, The Cryosphere, 6,
1541–1552, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-1541-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-6-1541-2012</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Tielidze, L. G.: Glacier change over the last century, Caucasus Mountains,
Georgia, observed from old topographical maps, Landsat and ASTER satellite
imagery, The Cryosphere, 10, 713–725, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-713-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-10-713-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Velichko, A. and Spasskaya, I.: Climate Change and the Development of
Landscapes, in: The Physical Geography of Northern Eurasia, edited by:
Shahgedanova, M, Oxford University Press, 36–69, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Vinogradov, V. N.: Katalog lednikov SSSR, Kamchatka [Inventory of glaciers of
the USSR, Kamchatka], v. 20: Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 2–4, 1968 (in
Russian).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Vinogradov, V. N., Muravyev, Y. D., and Ovsyannikov, A. A.: Influence of
eruption of Plosky Tolbachik volcano in 1975–76 on snow cover and glaciers,
Voprosy Geographii Kamchatki, 9, 95–102, 1985 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>VONA/KVERT Weekly Release, 26 May 2016, KVERT, Institute of Volcanology and
Seismology FEB RAS, available at:
<uri>http://www.kscnet.ru/ivs/kvert/van/index.php?n=21-2016</uri>, last access: 27
May 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
WGMS: World Glacier Inventory – Status 1988, edited by: Haeberli, W.,
Bösch, H., Scherler, K., Østrem, G., and Wallén, C. C., IAHS
(ICSI)/UNEP/UNESCO, World Glacier Monitoring Service, Zurich, Switzerland,
458, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Yamaguchi, S., Shiraiwa, T., Nishimura, K., Matsumoto, T., Kohshima, S.,
Muravyev, Y., and Naruse, R.: Distribution and short-term variations of fIow
velocities at Koryto Glacier in the Kronotsky Peninsula, Kamchatka, Russia,
in 1997, Bull. Glaciol. Res., 16, 51–56, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Yamaguchi, S., Sawagaki, T., Matsumoto, T., Muravyev, Y. D., and Naruse, R.:
Influence of Debris Cover on Ogive-like Surface Morphology of Bilchenok
Glacier inKamchatka, Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 39, 332–339,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Yamaguchi, S., Naruse, R., and Shiraiwa, T.: Climate reconstruction since the
Little Ice Age by modelling Koryto glacier, Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia, J.
Glaciol., 54, 125–130, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Rapid glacial retreat on the Kamchatka Peninsula during the early 21st
century</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Monitoring glacier fluctuations provides insights into
changing glacial environments and recent climate change. The availability of
satellite imagery offers the opportunity to view these changes for remote
and inaccessible regions. Gaining an understanding of the ongoing changes in
such regions is vital if a complete picture of glacial fluctuations globally
is to be established. Here, satellite imagery (Landsat 7, 8 and ASTER) is
used to conduct a multi-annual remote sensing survey of glacier fluctuations
on the Kamchatka Peninsula (eastern Russia) over the 2000–2014 period.
Glacier margins were digitised manually and reveal that, in 2000, the
peninsula was occupied by 673 glaciers, with a total glacier surface area of
775.7 ± 27.9 km<sup>2</sup>. By 2014, the number of glaciers had increased
to 738 (reflecting the fragmentation of larger glaciers), but their surface
area had decreased to 592.9 ± 20.4 km<sup>2</sup>. This represents a
 ∼  24 % decline in total glacier surface area between 2000
and 2014 and a notable acceleration in the rate of area loss since the late
20th century. Analysis of possible controls indicates that these
glacier fluctuations were likely governed by variations in climate
(particularly rising summer temperatures), though the response of individual
glaciers was modulated by other (non-climatic) factors, principally glacier
size, local shading and debris cover.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ananicheva, M. D., Krenke, A. N., and Barry, R. G.: The Northeast Asia
mountain glaciers in the near future by AOGCM scenarios, The Cryosphere, 4,
435–445, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-435-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-4-435-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Arendt, A., Bolch, T., Cogley, J. G., Gardner, A., Hagen, J.-O., Hock, R.,
Kaser, G., Pfeffer, W. T., Moholdt, G., Paul, F., Radić, V., Andreassen,
L., Bajracharya, S., Beedle, M., Berthier, E., Bhambri, R., Bliss, A., Brown,
I., Burgess, E., Burgess, D., Cawkwell, F., Chinn, T., Copland, L., Davies,
B., De Angelis, H., Dolgova, E., Filbert, K., Forester, R., Fountain, A.,
Frey, H., Giffen, B., Glasser, N., Gurney, S., Hagg, W., Hall, D.,
Haritashya, U. K., Hartmann, G., Helm, C., Herreid, S., Howat, I., Kapustin,
G., Khromova, T., Kienholz, C., Koenig, M., Kohler, J., Kriegel, D., Kutuzov,
S., Lavrentiev, I., LeBris, R., Lund, J., Manley, W., Mayer, C., Miles, E.,
Li, X., Menounos, B., Mercer, A., Moelg, N., Mool, P., Nosenko, G., Negrete,
A., Nuth, C., Pettersson, R., Racoviteanu, A., Ranzi, R., Rastner, P., Rau,
F., Raup, B. H., Rich, J., Rott, H., Schneider, C., Seliverstov, Y., Sharp,
M., Sigurðsson, O., Stokes, C., Wheate, R., Winsvold, S., Wolken, G.,
Wyatt, F., and Zheltyhina, N.: Randolph Glacier Inventory [v2.0]: A Dataset
of Global Glacier Outlines, Global Land Ice Measurements from Space, Boulder
Colorado, USA, Digital Media, edited by: Bajracharya, S. R. and Shresta, B.,
The Status of Glaciers in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region, Kathmandu: ICIMOD,
2011, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Arendt, A., Bliss, A., Bolch, T., Cogley, J. G., Gardner, A. S., Hagen,
J.-O., Hock, R., Huss, M., Kaser, G., Kienholz, C., Pfeffer, W. T., Moholdt,
G., Paul, F., Radić, V., Andreassen, L., Bajracharya, S., Barrand, N. E.,
Beedle, M., Berthier, E., Bhambri, R., Brown, I., Burgess, E., Burgess, D.,
Cawkwell, F., Chinn, T., Copland, L., Davies, B., De Angelis, H., Dolgova,
E., Earl, L., Filbert, K., Forester, R., Fountain, A. G., Frey, H., Giffen,
B., Glasser, N., Guo, W. Q., Gurney, S., Hagg, W., Hall, D., Haritashya, U.
K., Hartmann, G., Helm, C., Herreid, S., Howat, I., Kapustin, G., Khromova,
T., König, M., Kohler, J., Kriegel, D., Kutuzov, S., Lavrentiev, I.,
LeBris, R., Liu, S. Y., Lund, J., Manley, W., Marti, R., Mayer, C., Miles, E.
S., Li, X., Menounos, B., Mercer, A., Mölg, N., Mool, P., Nosenko, G.
Negrete, A., Nuimura, T., Nuth, C., Pettersson, R., Racoviteanu, A., Ranzi,
R., Rastner, P., Rau, F., Raup, B., Rich, J., Rott, H., Sakai, A., Schneider,
C., Seliverstov, Y., Sharp, M., Sigurðsson, O., Stokes, C., Way, R. G.,
Wheate, R., Winsvold, S., Wolken, G., Wyatt, F., and Zheltyhina, N.: Randolph
Glacier Inventory – A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines: Version 5.0.
Global Land Ice Measurements from Space, Boulder Colorado, USA, Digital
Media, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bajracharya, S. R. and Shresta, B. (Eds.): The Status of Glaciers in the
Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region, Kathmandu: ICIMOD, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bajracharya, S. R., Maharjan, S. B., and Shrestha, F.: The status and decadal
change of glaciers in Bhutan from the 1980s to 2010 based on satellite data,
Ann. Glaciol., 55, 66, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG66A125" target="_blank">doi:10.3189/2014AoG66A125</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barr, I. D. and Clark, C. D.: Glaciers and climate in Pacific Far NE Russia
during the Last Glacial Maximum, J. Quaternary Sci., 26, 227–237, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Barr, I. D. and Clark, C. D.: An updated moraine map of Far NE Russia,
Journal of Maps, 8, 431–436, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Barr, I. D. and Clark, C. D.: Late Quaternary glaciations in Far NE Russia;
combining moraines, topography and chronology to assess regional and global
glaciation synchrony, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 53, 72–87, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Barr, I. D. and Solomina, O.: Pleistocene and Holocene glacier fluctuations
upon the Kamchatka Peninsula, Global Planet. Change, 113, 110–120, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bhambri, R., Bolch, T., and Chaujar, R. K.: Mapping of debris-covered
glaciers in the Garhwal Himalayas using ASTER DEMs and thermal data, Int. J.
Remote Sens., 32, 8095–8119, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bhambri, R., Bolch, T., Kawishwar, P., Dobhal, D. P., Srivastava, D., and
Pratap, B.: Heterogeneity in glacier response in the upper Shyok valley,
northeast Karakoram, The Cryosphere, 7, 1385–1398,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1385-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-7-1385-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bolch, T., Yao, T., Kang, S., Buchroithner, M. F., Scherer, D., Maussion, F.,
Huintjes, E., and Schneider, C.: A glacier inventory for the western
Nyainqentanglha Range and the Nam Co Basin, Tibet, and glacier changes
1976–2009, The Cryosphere, 4, 419–433, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-419-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-4-419-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Braitseva, O. A., Melekestsev, I. V., Ponomareva, V. V., and Sulerzhitsky,
L. D.: Ages of calderas, large explosive craters and active volcanoes in the
KuriI-Kamchatka region, Russia Bulletin of Volcanology, 57, 383–402, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Braitseva, O. A., Ponomareva, V. V., Sulerzhitsky, L. D., Melekestsev, I. V.,
and Bailey, J.: Holocene Key-Marker Tephra Layers in Kamchatka, Russia,
Quaternary Res., 47, 125–139, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Bulin, N. K.: Abyssal structure of Kamchatka and the Kuril Islands from
seismic data, Int. Geol. Rev., 20, 777–784, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Burns, P. and Nolin, A.: Using atmospherically-corrected Landsat imagery to
measure glacier area change in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru from 1987 to 2010,
Remote Sens. Environ., 140, 165–178, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Copland, L., Sharp, M. J., and Dowdeswell, J. A.: The distribution and flow
characteristics of surge-type glaciers in the Canadian High Arctic, Ann.
Glaciol., 36, 73–81, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
DeBeer, C. M. and Sharp, M. J.: Recent changes in glacier area and volume
within the southern Canadian Cordillera, Ann. Glaciol., 46, 215–221, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Earl, L. and Gardner, A.: A satellite-derived glacier inventory for North
Asia, Ann. Glaciol., 57, 50–60, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3189/2016AoG71A008" target="_blank">doi:10.3189/2016AoG71A008</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Evans, I. S.: Local aspect asymmetry of mountain glaciation: A global survey
of consistency of favoured directions for glacier numbers and altitudes,
Geomorphology, 73, 166–184, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Farinotti, D., Longuevergne, L., Moholdt, G., Duethmann, D., Mölg, T.,
Bolch, T., Vorogushyn, S., and Güntner, A.: Substantial glacier mass loss
in the Tien Shan over the past 50 years, Nature Geosci., 8, 716–723, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S.,
Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E., Roth, L., Seal, D., Shaffer, S.,
Shimada, J., Umland, J., Werner, M., Orkin, M., Burbank, D., and Alsdor, D.:
The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, Rev. Geophys., 45, RG2004,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005RG000183</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, M., Huss, M., and Hoelzle, M.: Surface elevation and mass changes of
all Swiss glaciers 1980–2010, The Cryosphere, 9, 525–540,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-525-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-9-525-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, H., Paul, F., and Strozzi, T.: Compilation of a glacier inventory for
the western Himalayas from satellite data: methods, challenges, and results,
Remote Sens. Environ., 124 832–843, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, P. and Rich, P. M.: A geometric solar radiation model with applications
in agriculture and forestry, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37,
25–35, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, J. and Lui, Y.: Applications of remote sensing, GIS and GPS in
glaciology: a review, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 25, 520–540, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Granshaw, F. D. and Fountain, A. G.: Glacier change (1958–1998) in the North
Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, USA, J. Glaciol., 52, 251–256,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Huss, M.: Extrapolating glacier mass balance to the mountain-range scale: the
European Alps 1900–2100, The Cryosphere, 6, 713–727,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-713-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-6-713-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Ivanov, A.: Kamchatka, in: The Physical Geography of Northern Eurasia, edited
by: Shahgedanova, M., Oxford University Press, 403–421, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kääb, A.: Remote sensing of mountain glaciers and permafrost creep,
Zürich, Universität Zürich, Geographisches Institut
(Schriftenreihe Physische Geographie 48) 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, A., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kamp, U. and Pan, C. G.: Inventory of glaciers in Mongolia, derived from
Landsat imagery from 1989 to 2011, Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical
Geography, 94,  653–669, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12105" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/geoa.12105</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Khromova, T., Nosenko, G., Kutuzov, S., Muraviev, A., and Chernova, L.:
Glacier area changes in Northern Eurasia, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 015003,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/1/015003" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/1/015003</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kotlyakov, V. M.: Problems and results of studies of mountain glaciers in the
Soviet Union, World Glacier Inventory - Proceedings of the Riederalp
Workshop, September 1978 IAHS-AISH, 126, 129–137, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lemke, P., Ren, J., Alley, R. B., Allison, I., Carrasco, J., Flato, G.,
Fujii, Y., Kaser, G., Mote, P., Thomas, R. H., and Zhang, T.: Observations:
Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical
Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon,
S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M.,
and Miller, H. L., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and
New York, NY, USA, 337–383, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Malinverni, E. S., Croci, C., and Sgroi, F.: Glacier Monitoring by Remote
sensing and GIS techniques in Open Source Environment, EARSeL eProceedings,
7, 120–132, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Man, Q. M., Guo, H. D., Liu, G., and Dong, P. L.: Comparison of different
methods for monitoring glacier changes observed by Landsat images, IOP
Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 17, 012127,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/17/1/012127" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1755-1315/17/1/012127</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Manevich, T. M. and Samoilenko, S. B.: Glaciers of the Koryak Volcano, Ice
and Snow, 52, 25–30, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Manevich, T. M., Muraviev, Y. D., and Samoilenko, S. B.: Glaciers of the
Avachinskaya volcano group: current condition (state), Ice and Snow, 55,
14–26, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Matoba, S., Ushakov, S. V., Shimbori, K., Sasaki, H., Yamasaki, T.,
Ovshannikov, A. A., Manevich, A. G., Zhideleeva, T. M., Kutuzov, S.,
Muravyev, Y. D., and Shiraiwa, T.: The glaciological expedition to Mount
Ichinsky, Kamchatka, Russia, Bull. Glaciol. Res., 24, 79–85, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Muraviev, Y. D.: Present day glaciation in Kamchatka–distribution of
glaciers and snow, Cryospheric Studies in Kamchatka II (Institute of Low
Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, 1–7, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Muraviev, A. Y.: Glacier size changes in Kronotsky Peninsula and
Alney-Chashakondzha Massif, Kamchatka Peninsula in the second half of XX
century and the beginning of XXI century, Ice and Snow, 2, 22–28, 2014
(summary in English).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Muraviev, A. Y. and Nosenko, G. A.: Glaciation change in northern part of the
Middle Range on Kamchatka Peninsula in the second half of the XX century Ice
and Snow, 2, 5–12, 2013 (in Russian with English abstract).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Muraviev, Y. D., Tsvetkov, D. G., Muraviev, A. Y., and Osipova, G. B.:
Dynamics of the Bilchenok Surging Glacier in the Klyuchevskaya, Ice and Snow,
52, 31–39, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Narozhniy, Y. and Zemtsov, V.: Current state of the Altai glaciers (Russia)
and trends over the period of instrumental observations 1952–2008, Ambio,
40, 575–588, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Nuimura, T., Sakai, A., Taniguchi, K., Nagai, H., Lamsal, D., Tsutaki, S.,
Kozawa, A., Hoshina, Y., Takenaka, S., Omiya, S., Tsunematsu, K., Tshering,
P., and Fujita, K.: The GAMDAM glacier inventory: a quality-controlled
inventory of Asian glaciers, The Cryosphere, 9, 849–864,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-849-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-9-849-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Oerlemans, J., Anderson, B., Hubbard, A., Huybrechts, P., Johannesson, T.,
Knap, W. H., Schmeits, M., Stroeven, A. P., van der Wal, R. S. W., Wallinga,
J., and Zuo, Z.: Modelling the response of glaciers to climate warming, Clim.
Dynam., 14, 267–274, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F. and Andreassen, L. M.: A new glacier inventory for the Svartisen
region, Norway, from Landsat ETM+ data: challenges and change assessment,
J. Glaciol., 55, 607–618, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F. and Haeberli, W.: Spatial variability of glacier elevation changes
in the Swiss Alps obtained from two digital elevation models, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L21502, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034718" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GL034718</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F., Kääb, A., and Haeberli, W.: Recent glacier changes in the
Alps observed by satellite: Consequences for future monitoring strategies,
Global Planet. Change, 56, 111–122, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F., Barry, R., Cogley, G., Frey, H., Haeberli, W., Ohmura, A.,
Ommanney, S., Raup, B., Rivera, A., and Zemp, M.: Recommendations for the
compilation of glacier inventory data from digital sources, Ann. Glaciol.,
51, 1–8, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F., Barrand, N. E., Baumann, S., Berthier, E., Bolch, T., Casey, K.,
Frey, H., Joshi, S. P., Konovalov, V., Le Bris, R., Mölg, N., Nosenko,
G., Nuth, C., Pope, A., Racoviteanu, A., Rastner, P., Raup, B., Scharrer, K.,
Steffen, S., and Winsvold, S.: On the accuracy of glacier outlines derived
from remote-sensing data, Ann. Glaciol., 54, 171–182, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Pfeffer, W. T., Arendt, A., Bliss, A., Bolch, T., Cogley, J., Gardner, A.,
Hagen, J., Hock, R., Kaser, G., Kienholz, C., Miles, E., Moholdt, G.,
Mölg, N., Paul, F., Radic, V., Rastner, P., Raup, B., Rich, J., Sharp,
M., and Consortium, T. R.: The Randolph Glacier Inventory: a globally
complete inventory of glaciers, J. Glaciol., 60 537–552, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Pieczonka, T. and Bolch, T.: Region-wide glacier mass budgets and area
changes for the Central Tien Shan between  ∼  1975 and 1999 using Hexagon
KH-9 imagery, Global Planet. Change, 128, 1–13, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Ponomareva, V., Melekestsev, I., Braitseva, O., Churikova, T., Pevzner, M.,
and Sulerzhitsky, L.: Late Pleistocene-Holocene Volcanism on the Kamchatka
Peninsula, Northwest Pacific Region Volcanism and Subduction: The Kamchatka
Region Geophysical Monograph Series, 172, 165–198, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Ponomareva, V., Portnyagin, M., Derkachev, A., Pendea, I. F., Bourgeois, J.,
Reimer P. J., Garbe-Schönberg, D., Krasheninnikov, S., and Nürnberg,
D.: Early Holocene M ∼  6 explosive eruption from Plosky volcanic massif
(Kamchatka) and its tephra as a link between terrestrial and marine
paleoenvironmental records, International J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.),
102, 1673–1699, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00531-013-0898-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00531-013-0898-0</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Racoviteanu, A., Arnaud, Y., and Williams, M.: Decadal changes in glacier
parameters in Cordillera Blanca, Peru derived from remote sensing, J.
Glaciol., 54, 499–510, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Racoviteanu, A. E., Arnaud, Y., Williams, M. W., and Manley, W. F.: Spatial
patterns in glacier characteristics and area changes from 1962 to 2006 in the
Kanchenjunga-Sikkim area, eastern Himalaya, The Cryosphere, 9, 505–523,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-505-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-9-505-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Ramírez, E., Francou, B., Ribstein, P., Descloitres, M., Guerin, R.,
Mendoza, J., Gallaire, R., Pouyaud, B., and Jordan, E.: Small glaciers
disappearing in the tropical Andes: a case-study in Bolivia: Glaciar
Chacaltaya (16 S), J. Glaciol., 47, 187–194, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Raup, B., Kääb, A., Kargel, J. S., Bishop, M. P., Hamilton, G., Lee,
E., Paul, F., Rau, F., Soltesz, D., Khalsaa, S. J. S., Beedle, M., and Helm,
C.: Remote sensing and GIS technology in the Global Land Ice Measurements
from Space (GLIMS) Project, Computers and Geosciences, 33, 104–125, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, T., Muravyev, Y. D., Kameda, T., Nishio, F., Toyama, Y., Takahashi,
A., Ovsyannikov, A. A., Salamatin, A. N., and Yamagata, K.: Characteristics
of a crater glacier at Ushkovsky volcano, Kamchatka, Russia, as revealed by
the physical properties of ice cores and borehole thermometry, J. Glaciol.,
47, 423–432, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, T., Bookhagen, B., and Cannon, F.: Improving semi-automated glacier
mapping with a multi-method approach: applications in central Asia, The
Cryosphere, 9, 1747–1759, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1747-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-9-1747-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Solomina, O., Wiles, G., Shiraiwa, T., and D'Arrigo, R.: Multiproxy records
of climate variability for Kamchatka for the past 400 years, Clim. Past, 3,
119–128, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-119-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/cp-3-119-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Stokes, C. R., Shahgedanova, M., Evans, I., and Popovnin, V. V.: Accelerated
loss of alpine glaciers in the Kodar Mountains, south-eastern Siberia, Global
Planet. Change, 101, 82–96, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Tennant, C., Menounos, B., Wheate, R., and Clague, J. J.: Area change of
glaciers in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, 1919 to 2006, The Cryosphere, 6,
1541–1552, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-1541-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-6-1541-2012</a>, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tielidze, L. G.: Glacier change over the last century, Caucasus Mountains,
Georgia, observed from old topographical maps, Landsat and ASTER satellite
imagery, The Cryosphere, 10, 713–725, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-713-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/tc-10-713-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Velichko, A. and Spasskaya, I.: Climate Change and the Development of
Landscapes, in: The Physical Geography of Northern Eurasia, edited by:
Shahgedanova, M, Oxford University Press, 36–69, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Vinogradov, V. N.: Katalog lednikov SSSR, Kamchatka [Inventory of glaciers of
the USSR, Kamchatka], v. 20: Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 2–4, 1968 (in
Russian).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Vinogradov, V. N., Muravyev, Y. D., and Ovsyannikov, A. A.: Influence of
eruption of Plosky Tolbachik volcano in 1975–76 on snow cover and glaciers,
Voprosy Geographii Kamchatki, 9, 95–102, 1985 (in Russian).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
VONA/KVERT Weekly Release, 26 May 2016, KVERT, Institute of Volcanology and
Seismology FEB RAS, available at:
<a href="http://www.kscnet.ru/ivs/kvert/van/index.php?n=21-2016" target="_blank">http://www.kscnet.ru/ivs/kvert/van/index.php?n=21-2016</a>, last access: 27
May 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
WGMS: World Glacier Inventory – Status 1988, edited by: Haeberli, W.,
Bösch, H., Scherler, K., Østrem, G., and Wallén, C. C., IAHS
(ICSI)/UNEP/UNESCO, World Glacier Monitoring Service, Zurich, Switzerland,
458, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Yamaguchi, S., Shiraiwa, T., Nishimura, K., Matsumoto, T., Kohshima, S.,
Muravyev, Y., and Naruse, R.: Distribution and short-term variations of fIow
velocities at Koryto Glacier in the Kronotsky Peninsula, Kamchatka, Russia,
in 1997, Bull. Glaciol. Res., 16, 51–56, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Yamaguchi, S., Sawagaki, T., Matsumoto, T., Muravyev, Y. D., and Naruse, R.:
Influence of Debris Cover on Ogive-like Surface Morphology of Bilchenok
Glacier inKamchatka, Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 39, 332–339,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Yamaguchi, S., Naruse, R., and Shiraiwa, T.: Climate reconstruction since the
Little Ice Age by modelling Koryto glacier, Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia, J.
Glaciol., 54, 125–130, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
